Take an ideal gas grey atmosphere with , constant surface gravity of a star , vanishing external pressure and . Integrating hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth gives . Its logarithmic temperature-pressure gradient is , so the Schwarzschild criterion for a monatomic gas is crossed at . The radiative continuation beyond that depth is unstable and must be replaced by convective transport.
For a grey atmosphere with , an ideal gas and , hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth integrates to , taking . The logarithmic radiative gradient is . Equating it to the monatomic adiabatic temperature gradient gives and the displayed onset temperature. Beyond this point the radiative profile must be replaced by convective transport.
In a grey atmosphere with and , hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth gives . With and , integration gives the displayed pressure-temperature relation. At the matching surface , the Eddington surface boundary condition gives , hence .
Write for the direction cosine and for the radiative transfer source function. Integrating the radiative transfer equation over solid angle gives
Radiative equilibrium makes the radiative flux constant, so .
For , the radiation-field moments are
Consequently the Eddington closure approximation holds. Substituting into the radiative transfer equation, with , gives . Equality for every requires and , with . The stipulated inward hemispheric radiative flux at the surface is
Putting this equal to zero fixes , hence . Using and the effective temperature definition gives the grey atmosphere law
The positivity limitation of a linear Eddington intensity matters here: the formal surface intensity is negative for . Thus this angular ansatz gives the requested Eddington surface boundary condition for approximate moments; vanishing integrated inward flux is not an exact, nonnegative, pointwise no-incoming radiation field.
Neglecting radiation pressure, the stellar hydrostatic equation and the definition of optical depth give hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth, . Since , putting gives
Taking and , the grey-atmosphere pressure with power-law opacity is therefore
The pressure formula printed in the PDF is missing the factor . Differentiating its right-hand side would otherwise give . For the correct limit is .
At the specified matching location, the luminosity relation makes , hence , and . Multiplying the corrected pressure relation by gives
This agrees with the PDF's final surface boundary condition for a power-law-opacity grey atmosphere. It also extends to negative wherever the model applies; at , its continuous limit is .
Buoyancy and the convective criterion. Consider a small fluid parcel displaced outward by . Assume that sound waves keep its pressure equal to the ambient pressure, while heat exchange is slow enough that its displacement is an adiabatic process. Composition is uniform, so the parcel and its surroundings have the same mean molecular weight. For an ideal gas, , and an adiabatic parcel obeys . If is the pressure change on moving outward, then
The density excess of the parcel at its new location is therefore
If , this excess is negative: the outward-displaced parcel is lighter and accelerates farther outward. A downward displacement similarly continues downward. Conversely, a smaller gradient gives a restoring buoyancy force. The Schwarzschild criterion is thus stability for and instability for , where the adiabatic temperature gradient is . For a monatomic gas,
A composition gradient would require the additional density effect in the Ledoux criterion; it is absent in this calculation.
Opacity and pressure. The supplied opacity is characteristic of a cool hydrogen-rich stellar atmosphere dominated by negative hydrogen ion opacity. Mostly neutral hydrogen can attach electrons supplied by partially ionized metals; bound-free and free-free absorption involving the resulting ions produces a steep positive temperature dependence. The weak density dependence and strong temperature sensitivity can be represented by local power-law fits. At fixed composition the given pressure form is equivalent to , because . This is an approximate fit over the relevant cool-atmosphere regime, not an exact opacity law at all temperatures; molecular opacity or hydrogen ionization eventually changes the regime.
For a geometrically thin atmosphere take the surface gravity of a star to be constant, . Combining with gives hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth,
The grey atmosphere relation gives . With negligible external pressure, , integration yields
An imposed nonzero external pressure would add ; the boundary assumption is what fixes the integration constant here.
The factor in parentheses is . Hence
The grey-atmosphere convection onset with eighth-power temperature opacity occurs when this reaches , so
The radiative continuation below this boundary would be unstable. Efficient convection instead keeps the deeper star approximately adiabatic.
Matching to the convective interior. Write . Eliminating density using the ideal gas law gives
at fixed composition. Since is a fixed number, the matching temperature is proportional to , while the matching pressure satisfies . Consequently
The polytropic mass-radius relation for index gives . Raising the matching relation to the ninth power and using therefore gives
Finally the Stefan–Boltzmann law yields the Hayashi relation with eighth-power temperature opacity,
Composition and the opacity normalization are fixed in this comparison. The entropy coefficient is spatially constant in each convective model, but need not be the same for stars with different masses or radii.
For the Schwarzschild criterion, displace a small gas parcel upwards. Assume its composition is unchanged, it remains in pressure balance with its surroundings, and it moves quickly enough that heat exchange is negligible. The parcel obeys the adiabatic equation of state . Combining this with the ideal gas equation gives , so its adiabatic temperature gradient is .
Let the surrounding temperature gradient be . For an upward displacement , the parcel's temperature relative to its new surroundings is
If , this is negative: the parcel is cooler and, at equal pressure and composition, denser than its surroundings. It therefore sinks back; a downward displacement likewise gives a restoring buoyancy force. If the inequality is reversed, the displaced parcel continues to rise. The stability condition is thus
Equality is the neutral boundary. There is no composition-gradient term because the ideal-gas parcel and the background have the same mean molecular weight.
In the thin upper stellar atmosphere, take a plane-parallel approximation with constant , optical depth increasing inward, and zero overlying pressure . Hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth gives . The ideal gas equation converts the stipulated opacity into
Define , so the given grey atmosphere relation is . Integrating from the surface gives
This proves the required pressure law. In particular times a function only of and .
For the grey-atmosphere convection onset with density-linear opacity, differentiate the two profiles to obtain the radiative temperature gradient:
It increases monotonically from zero, since , and first reaches the adiabatic temperature gradient at . Therefore
Below this point the radiative stratification is unstable and convection must transport some of the outward energy flux.
At the outer convection boundary, depends only on , so and for fixed . The matching constant in is . Consequently
This temperature form of the polytropic relation follows from an ideal monatomic adiabat; its is not the density-polytrope coefficient in Question 3.
For the deep radiative boundary beneath a power-law-opacity convective envelope, negligible envelope mass and absent local energy generation give and . Divide the radiative temperature equation by the pressure equation to get the stellar radiative temperature gradient
This is the gradient that would be needed if radiation alone carried , and it is the quantity to compare with even while the actual region is convective. The deeper Kramers' opacity law gives . Substituting yields
As rises inward this decreases, so the transition back to a stable radiative interior is at
Thus . Using the outer matching and the Stefan–Boltzmann law,
The mass and radius cancel. Hence, at fixed opacity coefficients and composition,
This uses the same adiabat through the convection zone and distinguishes its inner transition temperature from its outer onset temperature.
Let be the gravitational energy. Multiply the stellar hydrostatic equation by and integrate through the star. Integration by parts and zero surface pressure give
while its hydrostatic right-hand side is . Hence the stellar virial theorem is
There is a genuine reference-sheet error to resolve. A monatomic ideal gas with adiabatic exponent has specific internal energy of an ideal gas , not the printed on PDF page 2. The latter would give total internal energy and zero total energy, inconsistent with radiating contraction. The following derivation uses the consistent monatomic value.
A fully convective star is approximately isentropic and has an adiabatic stellar polytrope with index . The given polytropic gravitational-energy formula yields . The virial relation gives total internal energy , so total energy is . At constant mass with no nuclear heating, Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction obeys , whence
Here denotes physical time.
In the plane-parallel atmosphere, the inward optical depth satisfies , so hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth gives . Neglecting radiation pressure, and the specified opacity becomes . Therefore
The grey atmosphere relation and the boundary integrate to
To apply the Schwarzschild criterion, put . Logarithmic differentiation gives
This increases inward, starting from zero. Marginal convection has , so . Since , the grey-atmosphere convection onset with seventeenth-power opacity is
The purely radiative atmosphere is used only up to this boundary.
The convective relation is spatially uniform in its entropy coefficient at each instant; can change as the star radiates and contracts. At the convection boundary is a fixed number, so at fixed composition and opacity normalization. Thus
On the other hand, the central scalings for the stellar polytrope give and . Hence, at fixed composition,
Equating the interior and atmosphere expressions yields . Applying the Stefan–Boltzmann law then proves the Hayashi contraction with seventeenth-power opacity relation
At fixed mass write , with constant and . The contraction equation is , where . Direct integration gives
Multiplying through by and substituting the current luminosity gives
For the stated very large initial radius, or after that initial-radius term becomes negligible,
This is the luminosity-age relation within the contraction model, rather than an assertion that a physical star begins at literally infinite radius.
Write , and use axial symmetry. The radiative flux is . Integrating the radiative transfer equation over directions gives
There are no energy sources in the atmosphere, so radiative equilibrium makes constant. Consequently
For the linear angular approximation , the radiation-field moments are
Thus it satisfies the Eddington closure approximation, and
Since is constant, . Substitution in the radiative transfer equation, using , gives , hence .
In this moment approximation, the inward hemispheric flux at the surface is
Setting this boundary moment to zero gives . Therefore
Combining it with the thermal source function and gives the grey atmosphere temperature law:
The surface condition is an approximate angular-moment condition. If the affine intensity were interpreted as an exact nonnegative boundary radiation field, no incident radiation would require for every ; a linear polynomial vanishing on that interval would have and no outward flux either. The derived formal profile indeed has . This positivity limitation of a linear Eddington intensity is why one uses the Eddington surface boundary condition as a moment closure, not the affine ansatz as an exact emergent angular intensity. An outward direction-independent intensity with no inward intensity gives the same boundary moments.
For the gas-pressure-dominated atmosphere, combine with . Thus the hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth is . Let . The grey atmosphere law implies . With the specified power-law opacity,
At the outer vacuum limit take and . Since , integration gives
This is the grey-atmosphere pressure with power-law opacity relation.
At the matching radius the local radiative flux is . In the thin plane-parallel atmosphere approximation this equals , so and . Multiplying the pressure relation by yields the required surface pressure-opacity relation
Here is a product, not a pressure subscript.
Take the gas pressure to vanish at the exterior boundary and the atmosphere to be thin enough that surface gravity of a star is constant. With constant electron-scattering opacity, negligible radiative acceleration, and hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth,
If the radiative force is retained, for gas pressure, and the same result holds with the constant positive effective gravity . A nonzero exterior gas pressure instead gives . Total gas-plus-radiation pressure has the nonzero radiative surface term from part (ii), so the advertised exact formula presumes gas pressure with zero exterior gas pressure.
A fully convective monatomic perfect-gas star follows an adiabatic stellar polytrope. At the photosphere, and hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth gives
For an ideal gas on an adiabat,
Evaluating this at the photosphere gives
The polytropic mass-radius relation is , so
Finally the Stefan–Boltzmann law gives
This is the specified Hayashi track.
For a plane-parallel atmosphere in radiative equilibrium, constant surface gravity of a star and opacity , match the stellar structure interior where the radiative flux satisfies . The grey atmosphere law then puts the surface at optical depth with . Integrating hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth from gives . Multiplication by proves the displayed boundary condition for , . At the integral is logarithmic and the continuous limit is . The relation assumes negligible radiation pressure and describes the Eddington closure approximation, rather than exact angular transfer.