Finite net 2026-10-06
Globally Lipschitz function Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-09-29
A function is globally Lipschitz when one Lipschitz bound holds for every pair of points in its domain. Unlike local Lipschitz continuity, this condition gives a uniform growth control over the whole domain.
For a strictly positive probability density function with Lipschitz bound , satisfies . If and , monotonicity gives and hence . The Lipschitz density height bound prevents extending this local argument to every by assuming for a strictly positive density.
Lipschitz constant Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-05
Lipschitz density height bound 2026-10-05
For a probability density function on with Lipschitz bound , the triangular lower envelope gives . If is strictly positive everywhere, the inequality is strict. Equality forces the entire probability density function to coincide with the triangular envelope, which vanishes outside a finite interval.
Locally Lipschitz function 2026-09-28
A function is locally Lipschitz when every point has a neighborhood on which the function satisfies a Lipschitz bound. Continuously differentiable functions are locally Lipschitz.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 31 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The empirical spectral measures of the two real symmetric matrices arewhere is the Dirac measure at . Thus . Pair the eigenvalues in the specified increasing order and apply the triangle inequality followed by Lipschitz continuity with bound :This deterministic estimate uses only the Lipschitz bound; no entry independence or distributional hypothesis is needed here.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 31 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
A function satisfies Lipschitz continuity with bound ifHere is an admissible Lipschitz bound; the least admissible value is the Lipschitz constant. The later parts use the admissible bound .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 31 2 v Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use the fixed common entry law from the printed setup: has mean zero and second moment for each upper-triangular entry, including the diagonal. LetSince , the removed part after centered truncation of a Wigner matrix isConsequently . Symmetry gives . There are diagonal terms and off-diagonal terms in this sum, soMirrored entries are counted twice, as they must be; independence of those mirrored entries is neither true nor needed for this expectation calculation.
By the preceding bound and the Markov inequality,The dominated convergence theorem applies to , so . Choose with . ThenThis second moment bound for spectral truncation depends only on and the common law of , and is uniform over functions with Lipschitz bound . No fourth-moment hypothesis is required. If the scaled entry law were allowed to vary arbitrarily with , a uniform choice would instead require uniform decay of its second-moment tails; the intended fixed-law setting supplies exactly that condition.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 1 12F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
The stated bound is Lipschitz continuity with constant . For every and every , taking ensures whenever . The same works at every point, so is both continuous and uniformly continuous.
For an integer , partition into equal intervals and define a step functionAt the remaining endpoint set , so the final interval may be taken closed on the right. The Lipschitz bound givesChoosing proves the requested uniform step approximation on a compact interval:A sufficiently fine partition gives a piecewise constant approximation uniformly over the whole interval.
The continuous function and every finite step function are Riemann integrable. Put . Integrating each constant piece explicitly givesSince the sine differences have absolute value at most , the triangle inequality and uniform approximation giveTo prove convergence, fix and first choose with . With this held fixed, the finite number is independent of , so the second term is also less than for sufficiently large . ThereforeFirst make the approximation error small, then let the oscillation frequency grow. This is the step-function proof of the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma; it does not require assuming that a Lipschitz function has an everywhere-defined derivative.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 209 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let and . The Lipschitz continuity of cosine and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality implyThe centered expectation term contributes ; omitting it would leave the Lipschitz bound incomplete. In particular has continuous sample paths on the compact cube, so its maximum exists and is measurable.
PutChoose a Cartesian finite net whose coordinate spacings are at most , including the endpoints. Every point of the cube is within Euclidean norm distance of , andOn the event , replacing any by a nearby grid point changes by at most . Since and , this is less than . ThereforeThe Markov inequality bounds the first event by . At a fixed , the summands are centered, independent and identically distributed, and have absolute value at most . The supplied Hoeffding inequality, with , bounds each grid event byA union bound now givesThe choice of balances the cost of a large random Lipschitz constant against the covering number of the cube: . Consequently works, withThis uses only the first moment and has a constant independent of . The finite net is deterministic even though the Lipschitz constant is random.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 210 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For , the nearest neighbour distance is the th order statistic of . Each has continuous distribution function on . The probability integral transform makes independent and identically distributed random variables with the uniform distribution on . Monotonicity of gives , a uniform order statistic. Strict monotonicity is not needed at this stage.
For , counting observations below givesDifferentiating and cancelling consecutive terms gives the Beta distribution:The Gamma function identity identifies this with the stated normalization. Ratios of Beta function integrals yield the momentsThis is the probability content of a nearest neighbour ball identity, specialized to intervals on the real line.
Now write . The Lipschitz bound givesThusStrict positivity of the probability density function makes continuous and strictly increasing from zero to one, so its inverse function is defined for every .
For the requested conditional calculation, suppose . At the preceding bound givesTherefore , and substituting in the approximation proves the inverse probability content bound for a Lipschitz density:The same argument works, without , on the meaningful local range with .
Since the nearest neighbour density estimator obeys , its conditional bound follows from the Beta distribution moments:Hence, under the printed location condition,The conditional inverse function bound also bounds , so the expected value in this calculation is finite under those formal hypotheses.
There is, however, a genuine flaw in the original PDF: the printed condition has no admissible points when is strictly positive on all of . A probability density function on all of cannot have Lipschitz constant zero, so . Its Lipschitz bound forcesIntegrating this triangular lower envelope gives the Lipschitz density height boundThe inequality is strict because the probability density function has positive mass outside the finite interval. Thus everywhere. The last two conditional conclusions above are valid implications but vacuous as printed. Dropping strict positivity gives only , with equality forcing the entire probability density function to be the normalized triangular envelope. The local inverse bound does not justify replacing the printed condition by its reverse in the final expected value bound, since ranges over all of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ia Paper 4 7E b i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For , factorization of a difference of powers givesConsequently the polynomial obeys the Lipschitz bound
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 339 1 b Solution 2026-09-28
The subgradient method chooses and a step size , then setsAssume, as the question's use of requires, that a minimizer exists, and write . Since every subgradient here has Euclidean norm at most , the standard best-iterate estimate isTaking a suitable constant step when the target accuracy is known, or a standard diminishing sequence, gives error at most initerations, so the requested exponent is .
Pointwise minimax rate for Lipschitz regression Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-07
At an interior target point in regular fixed-design nonparametric regression, mean functions with Lipschitz bound have pointwise minimax risk of order for fixed positive as . A smoothing bandwidth of order balances squared bias of an estimator and variance; the two-point lower bound with a triangular bump gives the matching lower rate.
For equally sized Hermitian matrices and a real test function with Lipschitz bound one, the difference of its averages under their empirical spectral measures is at most times the Frobenius norm of their difference. Pair the increasing eigenvalues, apply the triangle inequality and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, then use the Hoffman–Wielandt inequality.
Two-point lower bound with a triangular bump 2026-10-05
For fixed-design nonparametric regression, compare with . This pair has parameter separation at , Lipschitz bound , and Kullback-Leibler divergence at most . Choosing controls total variation distance by Pinsker's inequality and yields the pointwise minimax rate for Lipschitz regression through the Le Cam two-point lemma.
A uniformly continuous real function on a closed bounded interval can be approximated uniformly by finite step functions. Given , choose a mesh smaller than the uniform-continuity distance and set the approximant equal to a sampled value on each interval. Then the supremum norm of the approximation error is at most . If the function has a Lipschitz bound , a mesh of maximum length gives the explicit error bound .