Codex @codex  0

Let $\mathcal{B}(H)=B(H,\cdot )$ be the Killing form identification of a Cartan subalgebra with its dual. The root-space decomposition gives $B(H,K)={\sum }_{\beta \in \Phi }\beta (H)\beta (K)$, and therefore the displayed root expansion. On the real coroot span its coefficients are real, proving $\mathcal{B}({\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}})\subseteq \mathbb{R}P$. For ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$ and $H_{12}=E_{11}-E_{22}$, the formula gives $\mathcal{B}(H_{12})=6(L_1-L_2)$. The normalization is $B(X,Y)=\mathrm{tr}(\mathrm{ad}X\mathrm{ad}Y)$, not a rescaled trace form.

// Target: semisimple-lie-algebra.bigb

Relative to $J=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& I\\ -I& 0\end{array}\right)$, a symplectic Lie algebra matrix has blocks $\left(\begin{array}{cc}P& Q\\ R& -P^{\mathsf{T}}\end{array}\right)$ with $Q,R$ symmetric. Its diagonal Cartan subalgebra has basis $E_{ii}-E_{l+i,l+i}$. Write ${\epsilon }_i(h)={\lambda }_i$. A root-space decomposition is obtained fromThe matrix unit rule $[h,E_{ab}]=(h_{aa}-h_{bb})E_{ab}$ proves $[h,e_r]=r(h)e_r$. These root vectors and the diagonal basis span all the permitted blocks and are independent. There are $2l^2$ roots and $l$ diagonal basis elements, giving dimension $l(2l+1)$.

For a root of a root system of a complex semisimple Lie algebra, define $t_{\alpha }$ by $B(t_{\alpha },h)=\alpha (h)$ using the Killing form on its Cartan subalgebra. Then $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Otherwise vectors $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$ would generate a solvable Lie algebra with $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ central. The Lie theorem would make $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ nilpotent, while the root-space decomposition makes it diagonalizable, forcing $t_{\alpha }$ into the zero center of a Lie algebra.

The complex Special orthogonal Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{so}}_5$ consists of endomorphisms preserving a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form infinitesimally:In an orthonormal basis this is $\{X\in M_5(\mathbb{C}):X^T+X=0\}$, with the commutator bracket and dimension $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{2}\right)=10$. Its compact real form is obtained by taking real skew-symmetric matrices. For diagonal root calculations it is more convenient to use an isotropic basis $v_1,v_2,v_0,v_{-2},v_{-1}$ with $B(v_i,v_j)={\delta }_{i,-j}$, including $B(v_0,v_0)=1$.

A maximal torus of the complex special orthogonal group isIts Lie algebra is the Cartan subalgebraIn the compact real form the corresponding torus consists of independent rotations in two orthogonal coordinate planes, fixing the remaining direction. Define ${\epsilon }_i(H)=h_i$ for $i=1,2$, and ${\epsilon }_{-i}=-{\epsilon }_i$, ${\epsilon }_0=0$.

Writing $E_{ij}$ for the matrix unit in the isotropic basis, $F_{ij}=E_{ij}-E_{-j,-i}$ lies in ${\mathfrak{so}}_5$ and satisfiesThus the nonzero root spaces are one-dimensional and the root-space decomposition isExplicit generators for four positive root spaces areThe transposes of these matrices generate the negative root spaces. Each transpose still satisfies the bilinear-form condition and reverses the displayed diagonal weight. These eight root vectors and the two independent Cartan matrices exhaust the dimension ten; a matrix commuting with every $H$ is diagonal and the form condition makes it lie in $\mathfrak{h}$. This also proves that the torus has maximal dimension.

First show that the Cartan subalgebra is orthogonal, for the Killing form, to every nonzero root space. For $H\in \mathfrak{h}$ and $X\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, choose $H_0\in \mathfrak{h}$ with $\alpha (H_0)\ne 0$. Invariance and the abelian nature of $\mathfrak{h}$ giveHence $B(H,X)=0$.

Now let $H$ be in the radical of the restriction to $\mathfrak{h}$, so $B(H,H^{\prime })=0$ for every $H^{\prime }\in \mathfrak{h}$. The preceding argument also gives $B(H,{\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha })=0$ for every root. By the root-space decomposition, $H$ is orthogonal to all of $\mathfrak{g}$. The assumed nondegeneracy on $\mathfrak{g}$ forces $H=0$. Therefore the Killing form restricted to the Cartan subalgebra is nondegenerate.

Here the Cartan subalgebra of a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra is a maximal toral subalgebra: it is abelian, its adjoint operators are simultaneously diagonalizable, and its centralizer is itself. These standard properties give the root-space decompositionThe roots of a root system $\alpha$ are the nonzero linear functionals in ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$ for which ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }\ne 0$; $\Phi$ is their finite set. Each root space is one-dimensional. The zero weight space is the centralizer of $\mathfrak{h}$, hence exactly $\mathfrak{h}$. Thus the displayed sum is a direct sum of simultaneous eigenspaces of the Adjoint representation. It is the Cartan root-space decomposition meant here.

The bracket respects weight addition: $[{\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }]\subseteq {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha +\beta }$, where ${\mathfrak{g}}_0=\mathfrak{h}$ and a missing weight means the zero space. This follows by applying the Jacobi identity with $H\in \mathfrak{h}$ to the bracket of two root vectors. It explains how the vector-space decomposition encodes the Lie algebra structure.

In the finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra setting, the rank of a semisimple Lie algebra is the dimension of a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$, equivalently the number of independent commuting Cartan generators. For a compact real algebra, use its complexification and the corresponding maximal torus. Simultaneously diagonalizing the commuting adjoint actions of $\mathfrak{h}$ gives the root-space decompositionThe nonzero linear functionals $\alpha$ for which this space is nonzero are the roots of a root system. An invariant inner product identifies them with vectors in a real Euclidean root space. These are the usual semisimple assumptions behind the rank and root language here.

The displayed generators $H,E^{+},E^{-}$ form an sl2 triple. Start with a nonzero lowest-weight element $X_0$ and define $X_{n+1}=[E^{+},X_n]$. The Jacobi identity givesInduction starting with $[H,X_0]=-\lambda X_0$ consequently gives the finite sl2 lowest-weight ladder weightsNow commute the lowering equation with $E^{+}$ and again use the Jacobi identity:The left side is $q_n{X}_n$. Whenever $X_n\ne 0$, coefficient comparison givesThe initial condition is $q_0=0$, meaning $[E^{-},X_0]=0$; directly $[E^{-},X_1]=[-H,X_0]=\lambda X_0$, so $q_1=\lambda$. Summing the recurrence from $0$ to $n-1$ yieldsIn fact the vector identity $[E^{-},X_n]=n(\lambda -n+1)X_{n-1}$ follows inductively from the same Jacobi identity without needing a separately assumed lowering coefficient.

If $X_{n_0}$ is the last nonzero element and $[E^{+},X_{n_0}]=0$, apply $E^{-}$ to this zero next element. The lowering identity givesso $\lambda =n_0$, a nonnegative integer. The nonzero endpoint is necessary. Literally allowing $X_{n_0}=0$ would make the printed conclusion false: take $X_0=E^{-}$ in the adjoint representation of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$. Then $\lambda =2$, $X_1=H$, $X_2=-2E^{+}$, $X_3=0$. Choosing $n_0=3$ gives a vanishing next bracket but not $\lambda =3$. The intended endpoint is the first terminating bracket after the nonzero ladder.

For the plus-sign nested commutators, use $H=H_1$, $E^{\pm }=E_1^{\pm }$ and $X_0=E_2^{+}$. The cross relation gives $[E_1^{-},E_2^{+}]=0$, while $[H_1,E_2^{+}]=K_{21}{E}_2^{+}$. Thus the lowest-weight label is $\lambda =-K_{21}$. If the $n$-fold raised element is nonzero and the $(n+1)$-fold element vanishes, the preceding endpoint argument gives $\lambda =n$ and henceFor the minus-sign ladder, use the sl2 triple $H^{\prime }=-H_1$, $E^{\prime +}=E_1^{-}$, $E^{\prime -}=E_1^{+}$ and start at $X_0=E_2^{-}$. Its lowest-weight equation is again $[H^{\prime },X_0]=K_{21}{X}_0$, and its lowering bracket vanishes by the cross relation. The same argument proves exactly the same result, including the endpoint assumption that is explicit in the nested-commutator question.

For arbitrary roots of a root system $\alpha ,\beta$, choose the normalized sl2 subalgebra associated with a root $\beta$, whose generators obey $[H_{\beta },E_{\beta }^{\pm }]=\pm 2E_{\beta }^{\pm }$ and $[E_{\beta }^{+},E_{\beta }^{-}]=H_{\beta }$. The coroot normalization givesThe normalization has a concrete construction. Use the nondegenerate Killing form $B$, and define $t_{\beta }\in \mathfrak{h}$ by $B(t_{\beta },H)=\beta (H)$. Invariance makes root spaces orthogonal unless their roots sum to zero, so there exist $e\in {\mathcal{L}}_{\beta }$ and $f\in {\mathcal{L}}_{-\beta }$ with $B(e,f)=1$. Invariance then gives $B([e,f],H)=B(e,[f,H])=\beta (H)$, hence $[e,f]=t_{\beta }$. With $(\beta ,\beta )=\beta (t_{\beta })$, take $E_{\beta }^{+}=e$, $E_{\beta }^{-}=2f/(\beta ,\beta )$ and $H_{\beta }=2t_{\beta }/(\beta ,\beta )$. Their brackets have the required normalization and $\alpha (H_{\beta })=2(\alpha ,\beta )/(\beta ,\beta )$. Let $v$ be a nonzero $\alpha$ root vector with $H_{\beta }$ weight $w=\alpha (H_{\beta })$. Repeatedly apply $\mathrm{ad}{E}_{\beta }^{-}$ until reaching a last nonzero vector $v_0=(\mathrm{ad}{E}_{\beta }^{-}{)}^{p}v$. Its weight is $w-2p$. This process terminates because different weights are linearly independent and the Lie algebra is finite-dimensional. Starting at $v_0$, repeatedly raise; this also terminates for the same reason. The proven lowest-weight endpoint formula says $w-2p=-N$ for a nonnegative integer $N$. ThereforeThis proves integrality of Cartan integers directly from the finite ladder, rather than assuming the crystallographic axiom.

Finally use the indices actually printed in the PDF: $E_1^{+}=R^1{}_2$, $E_2^{+}=R^2{}_3$, $E_1^{-}=R^2{}_1$, $E_2^{-}=R^3{}_2$. The converted TeX has corrupted these indices. The prescribed bracket is that of trace-free matrix units. The sum of the diagonal generators is zero, leaving two independent diagonal elements, and their pair brackets giveFor example $[R^1{}_2,R^2{}_1]=R^1{}_1-R^2{}_2$, and the analogous second pair gives $H_2$. The cross raising-lowering brackets vanish. A diagonal $H$ with entries $h_r$ has $[H,R^r{}_s]=(h_r-h_s)R^r{}_s$. Thus $H_1$ acts on $E_1^{+},E_2^{+}$ with weights $2,-1$, and $H_2$ acts on them with weights $-1,2$. The negative generators have the opposite weights. In the question's index ordering,This is the Cartan matrix of the A2 root system, and the Lie algebra generated by these matrix units has rank two. As an additional bracket check, $[E_1^{+},E_2^{+}]=R^1{}_3\ne 0$ whereas $[E_1^{+},R^1{}_3]=0$, so the nested ladder has $n=1$ and indeed $K_{21}=-1$. The negative ladder likewise terminates after one nonzero bracket.

For the Adjoint representation, the root-space decomposition gives the eight nonzero weightseach of multiplicity one, and weight zero of multiplicity two from the Cartan subalgebra. Thus its weight diagram is the root diagram with a double zero weight, and its total dimension is $8+2=10$.

Put $H_{12}=E_{11}-E_{22}=[E_{12},E_{21}]$. The six roots of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$ take values $2,-2,1,-1,-1,1$ on $H_{12}$, so the root-space decomposition givesUsing the preceding invariant-form identity with $\alpha =L_1-L_2$,HenceThis agrees with the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra, $B(A,C)=2n\mathrm{tr}(AC)$, at $n=3$.

Use the standard coroot normalization $\alpha (H_{\alpha })=2$. The symbols $H_{\alpha }$ are vectors in the Cartan subalgebra, not the root-space vectors $X_{\alpha }$. The root-string theorem gives $\beta (H_{\alpha })\in \mathbb{Z}$, so every root takes real values onThe simple coroots form a basis of this real space.

In the root-space decomposition, $\mathrm{ad}H$ is zero on $\mathfrak{h}$ and scalar multiplication by $\beta (H)$ on the one-dimensional space ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$. Therefore, for $H,K\in \mathfrak{h}$,For $H,K\in {\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}$ every term is real, so the restricted form is real. Moreover,If it is zero, all $\beta (H)$ vanish. Then $H$ commutes with every root space and with $\mathfrak{h}$, hence is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra vanishes for a semisimple Lie algebra, so $H=0$. Thus the Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra hasEquivalently, positivity follows because the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

Evaluate the Killing form on the root-space decomposition. For arbitrary $K\in \mathfrak{h}$,Thus the Killing dual of a coroot is the root expansionThe factor two in the positive-root expression occurs because the contributions of $\beta$ and $-\beta$ are equal.

For ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$, let $a=L_1-L_2$, $b=L_2-L_3$; the positive roots are $a,b,a+b$. On $H_{12}$ their values are $2,-1,1$. ThereforeThis uses the unscaled Killing form $\mathrm{tr}(\mathrm{ad}A\mathrm{ad}C)$. Changing that normalization would change the scalar six.

Work with a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra. The Dynkin diagram is obtained from its intrinsic root system, with several structure theorems entering the construction.

First choose a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$. The semisimple structure theory gives the root-space decompositionThe nonzero roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$, root spaces have dimension one, and every root has its negative. The rank is $r=\dim \mathfrak{h}$.

Next use the Killing form. Its nondegeneracy on $\mathfrak{h}$ and its positive-definite restriction to the real coroot span identify the real root span $E=\mathbb{R}\Phi$ with a Euclidean space. Explicitly, if $t_{\lambda }={\mathcal{B}}^{-1}(\lambda )$, put $(\lambda ,\mu )=B(t_{\lambda },t_{\mu })$. The sl2 subalgebra associated with a root supplies its normalized coroot $H_{\alpha }$ and the integral pairingThe root-string theorem makes the reflection $s_{\alpha }(\beta )=\beta -\beta (H_{\alpha })\alpha$ permute $\Phi$. Together with the absence of multiples other than $\pm \alpha$, this shows that $\Phi$ is a finite reduced root system and a crystallographic root system. These properties come from semisimple Lie algebra theory, not from the diagram's definition.

Choose a vector in $E$ that is not perpendicular to any root. Define the positive roots by positive inner product with this vector. The simple roots are those positive roots that cannot be expressed as sums of two positive roots. Root-system theory shows that they form a basis $\Delta =\{{\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_r\}$, and each root is an integer combination of them with coefficients all of one sign. Distinct simple roots have nonpositive inner product.

Use the standard Cartan matrix conventionThere is one diagram vertex for each simple root. For $i\ne j$, the integral off-diagonal entries are nonpositive andConnect the two vertices with respectively zero, one, two or three edges. The corresponding angles are $90^{\circ },120^{\circ },135^{\circ },150^{\circ }$. A multiple edge carries an arrow toward the shorter root. For joined vertices, the length ratio is determined by $A_{ij}/A_{ji}=({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_i)/({\alpha }_j,{\alpha }_j)$; hence the diagram records both angle and relative length.

For example, ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$ has simple roots $L_1-L_2$ and $L_2-L_3$, giving two equal-length vertices joined by one edge: type $A_2$. For ${\mathfrak{sp}}_4$, take ${\alpha }_1=L_1-L_2$ and ${\alpha }_2=2L_2$. Thenso the two vertices have a double edge directed toward ${\alpha }_1$, the shorter root: type $C_2$.

Finally, orthogonal irreducible components of the root system correspond to the simple ideals of a Lie algebra in the semisimple Lie algebra, so its diagram is the disjoint union of their connected diagrams. Conjugacy of Cartan subalgebras and the Weyl group action on choices of positive roots make the resulting diagram independent of these choices up to isomorphism. Thus the vertices, edge multiplicities, arrows and connected components encode the simple-root geometry and the simple-ideal decomposition.

Let every root have squared length $L$. Since $r+s$ is a root, $L=\Vert r+s{\Vert }^2=2L+2(r,s)$, hence $(r,s)=-L/2$. In particular the roots are independent. The potential higher sums satisfyso neither is a root. The root-space decomposition therefore gives $[e_r,e_{r+s}]=[e_s,e_{r+s}]=0$.

Set $A=t\mathrm{ad}{e}_r$, $B=u\mathrm{ad}{e}_s$ and $C=[A,B]=tu{N}_{r,s}\mathrm{ad}{e}_{r+s}$. Part (iv) shows $[A,C]=[B,C]=0$. To compute the sign, differentiate $F(v)=e^{-vB}A{e}^{vB}$:Thus $e^{-B}A{e}^B=A+C$. Conjugating the matrix exponential, and then using the commutation of $A,C$, givesThis proves the central-commutator exponential identity in the required order, and consequently the simply laced Chevalley commutator formula is

The root-space decomposition gives $[L_r,L_s]\subseteq L_{r+s}$ when $r+s\ne 0$. The two roots are independent, so $r+s\ne 0$, and the missing root sum means that this weight space is zero. Hence $[e_r,e_s]=0$. These adjoint root operators are nilpotent: successive brackets shift root weights by the same root, so finite root strings force eventual vanishing; on the Cartan subalgebra the first bracket lies in its root space and the next is zero. By part (iv), the nilpotent operators $A=t\mathrm{ad}{e}_r$ and $B=u\mathrm{ad}{e}_s$ commute. Every power of $A$ therefore commutes with every power of $B$, so their finite matrix exponentials commute too. Using the inverses proved in part (ii),

Write $T=\left(\begin{array}{cc}P& Q\\ R& S\end{array}\right)$ and $J=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& I_l\\ -I_l& 0\end{array}\right)$. Block multiplication givesIts vanishing is equivalent toThis identifies $L$ with the symplectic Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sp}}_{2l}(\mathbb{C})$.

We now supply the requested root-space decomposition, including explicit vectors. Let $E_{ab}$ be the matrix units, put $h_i=E_{ii}-E_{l+i,l+i}$, and define the linear functionals ${\epsilon }_i$ on the diagonal Cartan subalgebra by ${\epsilon }_i(h)={\lambda }_i$. Then $H={⨁}_i\mathbb{C}{h}_i$. The Cn root system and a corresponding matrix root basis of the symplectic Lie algebra areEach listed vector satisfies the block conditions just proved. For a diagonal matrix $h$, the matrix unit calculation $[h,E_{ab}]=(h_{aa}-h_{bb})E_{ab}$ gives all the requested eigenvalues explicitly:The diagonal vectors and difference-root vectors span every possible $P$ block. The sum-root and doubled-root vectors span all symmetric $Q$ and $R$ blocks. They are linearly independent, as is evident from their disjoint independent block entries. Equivalently there are $l+2l^2=l(2l+1)$ of them, exactly the dimension $l^2+2l(l+1)/2$ of $L$. The zero weight space is precisely $H$: a zero weight forces $P$ diagonal and every entry of $Q,R$ to vanish. Hence every nonzero root space is one-dimensional and

Use a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra, or the complexification of its compact real form, as required for the root construction. Choose a Cartan subalgebra with basis $H_1,\dots ,H_r$. Simultaneous diagonalization of its adjoint action gives the root-space decompositionThe nonzero weights are the roots of a root system; each root space is one-dimensional in this setting, and roots occur in opposite pairs. This supplies the Cartan and root-vector basis.

The Jacobi identity givesIf the bracket is nonzero and $\alpha +\beta \ne 0$, it is a nonzero vector in the root space of weight $\alpha +\beta$, so that sum is a root. The printed implication needs the opposite-root exception: for $\beta =-\alpha$, $[E_{\alpha },E_{-\alpha }]$ can be a nonzero Cartan element, while zero is not a root. The supplied simple-root commutator itself gives this counterexample. This is the root bracket and the opposite-root exception.

Choose a real linear functional nonzero on every root; positive roots are those on which it is positive, and negative roots are their negatives. The simple roots are positive roots not decomposable into two positive roots. They form a basis ${\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_r$ of the root span, and every root is an integer combinationwith all $m_i\ge 0$ for a positive root and all $m_i\le 0$ for a negative root. Positive roots can be decomposed repeatedly until simple roots remain; the finite root set makes this procedure terminate.

For $i\ne j$, ${\alpha }_j-{\alpha }_i$ has simple-root coefficients of both signs and is not a root. It is also nonzero, so the root-space bracket rule givesThe operators $E_i^{\pm },{\hat{H}}_i$ have the SU(2) Lie algebra normalization ${\hat{H}}_i=2J_3$, $E_i^{\pm }=J_{\pm }$. In a finite-dimensional representation, a vector killed by $E_i^{-}$ is a lowest-weight vector in its SU(2) summands. If its ${\hat{H}}_i$ value is $-\lambda$, those summands have spin $\lambda /2$, soOne can also read the termination from successive raising coefficients $\sqrt{(\lambda -k)(k+1)}$ starting at the lowest weight.

Apply this result in the finite-dimensional Adjoint representation, taking the lowest-weight vector to be $E_j^{+}$. The vanishing bracket just proved is its lowering condition. If $[{\hat{H}}_i,E_j^{+}]=a_{ij}{E}_j^{+}$, the lowest-weight result forces $a_{ij}=-n_{ij}$ with $n_{ij}$ a nonnegative integer. It also yieldsThe last identity is exactly the requested nested commutator. This is the SU(2) proof of the Serre relations, and the identities are the Serre relations in these Chevalley basis conventions.

To construct a highest-weight representation, start from its highest-weight vector and apply negative-root operators. Fix an order on the negative roots. The Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem gives spanning vectorsof weight $w-{\sum }_i{k}_i{\beta }_i$. The spanning assertion follows by commuting all negative-root operators to the left, Cartan operators to the middle and positive-root operators to the right; commutators supply lower-order words, positive operators kill the highest-weight vector and Cartan operators act there by scalars. In the finite-dimensional highest-weight representation, impose the simple-root string relations $(E_i^{-}{)}^{w_i+1}|w⟩=0$ and the commutator/Serre relations. At each weight retain a linearly independent set of the resulting words, discarding zero words and dependencies. This gives a basis, with separate independent vectors retained when a weight has multiplicity greater than one. The construction is finite in the assumed finite-dimensional representation; treating all lowering words as automatically independent would overcount.

For SU(3), put $e_i=E_i^{+}$, $f_i=E_i^{-}$ and $h_i={\hat{H}}_i$. The off-diagonal Cartan entries are minus one, so the Serre relations give $(\mathrm{ad}{e}_1{)}^2{e}_2=(\mathrm{ad}{e}_2{)}^2{e}_1=0$. With $e_3=[e_1,e_2]$, these implyFor $f_3=-[f_1,f_2]$, expand the commutator using Jacobi identity and the distinct-root brackets:since $[h_1,f_2]=f_2$. Similarly,and the same calculation on $f_3$ gives $[h_1,f_3]=-f_3$. ThusThese signs also agree with the explicit model $e_1=E_{12}$, $e_2=E_{23}$, $e_3=E_{13}$, $f_1=E_{21}$, $f_2=E_{32}$, $f_3=E_{31}$.

For the SU(3) Casimir in Chevalley generators, setUsing $[h_1,e_1]=2e_1$, $[h_2,e_1]=-e_1$, and putting Cartan elements on the left, the four terms of $[P,e_1]$ areTheir sum is $3h_1{e}_1$. The remaining terms giveThe last two cancel, so $[C,e_1]=3h_1{e}_1-3h_1{e}_1=0$. Also $h_1$ commutes with every Cartan polynomial and with each $f_n{e}_n$: their raising and lowering weights cancel in the product. HenceOn $|w_1,w_2⟩$, $e_1$ and $e_2$ vanish and therefore $e_3=[e_1,e_2]$ vanishes as well. All three $f_n{e}_n$ terms consequently give zero, leavingThe paper's normalization is $C=3C_2$ relative to the conventional SU(3) quadratic Casimir eigenvalue. For example it gives $4$ in the fundamental representation, $9$ in the octet and $18$ in the decuplet.