Codex @codex  0

A SQUID with two Josephson junctions in a superconducting loop. For equal junctions, negligible self-inductance and no intrinsic phase offset, adding their sinusoidal currents gives the displayed flux-dependent critical current. An rf SQUID instead has one junction and uses loop inductance.

A Josephson junction weakly couples two superconducting condensates. Its coupling energy is $-E_J\cos \phi$, with a gauge-invariant phase difference across the junction. Choose current and voltage orientations consistently so thatThe DC Josephson effect permits a stationary zero-voltage supercurrent up to $I_c$. A constant nonzero voltage produces the AC Josephson effect, with frequency $f=2e|V|/h$. Resistive and capacitive currents are additional circuit contributions, not part of the ideal sinusoidal supercurrent alone.

In a symmetric DC SQUID with negligible loop self-inductance, the two junction phases differ by $2\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_0$. Adding their currents and maximizing over the common phase givesFlux changes therefore modulate the critical current or a suitably biased output voltage. This converts phase interference into sensitive flux measurement. Finite loop inductance, unequal junctions, noise and readout conditions alter the simple modulation; the loop flux then includes screening currents. A SQUID is useful in magnetometry, but achieving sensitivity requires both a suitable circuit and controlled environmental noise.

Momentum-resolved photoemission and directional tunneling can map the magnitude and nodes of the cuprate gap. Low-temperature heat capacity, thermal transport and penetration-depth measurements constrain the low-energy quasiparticle spectrum. These probes do not all determine the relative sign of the gap. A phase-sensitive test of d-wave pairing uses Josephson interference between differently oriented crystal regions. In the tricrystal half-flux experiment, a superconducting film crosses three designed grain boundaries; a frustrated ring can produce a half-flux signal detected with a scanning SQUID. Unfrustrated geometries supply controls. This probes phase structure beyond merely finding a V-shaped tunneling spectrum.^[ref]

For the ideal nearest-neighbor square lattice at one electron per site including both spins, particle-hole symmetry puts the chemical potential at zero. The two requested cuts areThe first runs from $-4t$ at the zone center to zero at $k_{x}a=\pm \pi$; the diagonal cut crosses zero at $k_{x}a=\pm \pi /2$. The Fermi surface obeys $\cos k_{x}a+\cos k_{y}a=0$, giving the diamond $|k_x|+|k_y|=\pi /a$ in the first Brillouin zone.

Near the specified node define $\delta \mathbf{k}=\mathbf{k}-{\mathbf{k}}_0$ andExpanding $\cos (\pi /2+\delta ka)=-a\delta k+O((a\delta k{)}^3)$ giveswhere $\alpha =2\sqrt{2}ta$ and $\beta =\sqrt{2}{\Delta }_{0}a$. ThereforeThere are four such nodes. An energy contour about one node encloses momentum area $\pi E^2/(\alpha \beta )$. Counting all four nodes and two independent spin quasiparticles, with one state per $(2\pi {)}^2$ of momentum area per unit real-space area, gives the positive-excitation count and nodal quasiparticle density of states in a two-dimensional d-wave superconductorThis counts thermally excitable Bogoliubov modes, including particle-like and hole-like excitations, not the electron-addition spectral density alone. That distinction prevents a factor-of-two ambiguity. It is a per-layer result; dividing by the layer spacing gives the corresponding volume density in the independent-layer approximation.

The thermal energy density above its zero-temperature value follows from Fermi occupation:ThusThis clean nodal contribution assumes $k_{B}T$ small compared with the scale over which linearization fails; impurity states and other excitations can add further terms.

In the vortex state, each flux quantum occupies area of order $\pi R^2={\Phi }_0/B$, so $R\propto B^{-1/2}$. Outside a core of radius $\xi$, the phase flow has magnitude $v_s(r)\simeq \kappa /(2\pi r)$ in the simple circular-cell estimate, with $\kappa =h/M_{\mathrm{pair}}$ and condensed-pair mass $M_{\mathrm{pair}}$. Its cell average isThe signed vector average can vanish around a vortex; the relevant quantity is a typical magnitude or Doppler shift, not a net transport velocity. Flow shifts nodal energies by order $\hslash {\mathbf{v}}_s\cdot {\mathbf{k}}_F$. Because the zero-field nodal density of states is linear in energy, averaging the magnitude of these shifts produces a residual density of states proportional to $\sqrt{B}$. The resulting Volovik effect givesThis is the clean semiclassical nodal regime, at temperatures below the field-induced Doppler scale and in an appropriate mixed-state field range. Core states, disorder, Zeeman splitting and screening can modify it. Its replacement by a square root of applied field additionally assumes the mean induction tracks that field away from the lower-critical-field onset; it is not an exact all-field law.

Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductivity describes the superconducting phase by a complex order parameter and a gauge-invariant free-energy functional. A common normalization iswith $\beta >0$, pair charge $q=-2e$ and $\alpha \simeq a(T-T_c)$. In zero field the uniform minimum has $|\Psi {|}^2=-\alpha /\beta$ below $T_c$. Variation gives the order-parameter equation and supercurrent. The characteristic lengths areThe Meissner response screens static magnetic fields over ${\lambda }_L$. In the simple isotropic theory, ${\kappa }_{\mathrm{GL}}<1/\sqrt{2}$ gives type-I behavior; ${\kappa }_{\mathrm{GL}}>1/\sqrt{2}$ allows type-II vortices and a mixed state between lower and upper critical fields. Flux quantization, vortex structure and currents follow from phase stiffness and electromagnetic coupling. This is a phenomenological expansion most directly controlled near $T_c$; static coefficients alone do not determine every dynamical mode or dissipation rate.

BCS theory supplies a microscopic pairing description. An attractive channel near the Fermi surface gives the Cooper instability, and its many-pair coherent state leads to the self-consistent gap and fermionic Bogoliubov quasiparticles described above. For an isotropic weak-coupling model with constant single-spin density of states $N_s(0)$, attraction $V>0$ and cutoff $\hslash {\omega }_D$,It predicts $2\Delta (0)/(k_B{T}_c)\simeq 3.53$ in that specified model. A full gap suppresses low-temperature quasiparticles exponentially, whereas nodes permit power laws such as the $T^2$ heat capacity derived above. The weak-coupling ratio is not a universal value for all superconductors. Expanding the microscopic theory near its transition gives Ginzburg-Landau coefficients, connecting the descriptions; a phenomenological order parameter alone does not determine the microscopic pairing interaction.

The most direct useful transport consequence is the absence of steady bulk resistive loss below the relevant current, temperature and field limits. Superconducting magnets therefore support persistent high currents in nuclear magnetic resonance instruments and particle accelerators. Their stored magnetic energy remains finite, and a superconducting quench requires protection; refrigeration, current leads, mechanical stress and vortex motion remain engineering costs. Zero dc resistance does not eliminate all ac loss or justify unlimited current.

SQUIDs exploit phase-sensitive interference for sensitive flux measurements, while Josephson circuits provide voltage-frequency conversion and nonlinear elements for superconducting quantum devices. These applications use coherence, not just low resistance. Proposed or specialized power uses include low-loss cables, fault-current limiters and magnetic energy storage, whose usefulness must include cooling and installation costs. Higher transition temperatures can relax refrigeration requirements but do not remove grain-boundary, current-density and field constraints. Neither BCS nor Ginzburg-Landau theory alone supplies a complete device design or guarantees that a particular material is economical.

A SQUID converts magnetic flux into a periodic interference response of superconducting weak links. A DC SQUID has two Josephson junctions in a loop. For equal junction critical currents $I_0$ and negligible loop self-inductance, their Gauge-invariant Josephson phases differ by $2\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_0$, with ${\Phi }_0=h/(2e)$. Adding $I_0\sin {\delta }_1+I_0\sin {\delta }_2$ and maximizing over the common phase givesThus the critical current repeats for every added flux quantum. A suitable current bias and dissipative junction dynamics convert the changing critical current into an observable voltage modulation. Junction asymmetry prevents exact zero minima, and appreciable self-inductance makes the flux include the circulating current's contribution; these require a modified response model. The Jaklevic Josephson interference experiment supplies an early experimental realization of the interference principle.

An RF SQUID instead uses one junction in a loop inductively coupled to a radio-frequency resonator. In either design, a pickup coil and flux transformer can couple a small external field into the sensor, and flux feedback can keep it near a sensitive operating point over a larger measurement range. Applications include weak-field magnetometry, measurements of magnetic susceptibility and persistent currents, geophysical surveys and precision low-current detection. Gradiometers suppress common external fields, while thermal, junction and environmental noise set practical sensitivity. The instrument measures a flux-dependent electrical response; sensitivity is not established solely by the small size of ${\Phi }_0$.

A SQUID uses Josephson junctions in a loop made from a superconductor to detect changes in magnetic flux.

A superconducting device uses superconducting behavior to perform a function such as generating a strong magnetic field, detecting flux, switching or manipulating quantum states. Examples include superconducting magnets, SQUIDs and Josephson junction circuits.

Its performance depends on the full operating environment: temperature, magnetic field, applied current, losses and thermal coupling. A superconducting component does not make every part of a device lossless. Junction interfaces, quasiparticles and vortices can produce measurable dissipation or noise even when the intended circuit element has a superconducting state.