Codex @codex  0

A binary star consists of two stars bound by gravity and moving around their shared astronomical barycenter. In a sufficiently isolated pair, a Kepler orbit approximates their relative motion. Combining the orbital period $P$ and relative semi-major axis $a$ gives the total mass through Kepler's third law, $M_1+M_2=4{\pi }^2{a}^3/(G{P}^2)$.

A resolved orbit supplies angular information; a spectroscopic binary supplies line-of-sight velocities; an eclipsing binary supplies geometric information through its light curve. Combining these can determine individual masses and stellar radii. Close pairs also exchange matter through binary mass transfer, altering their subsequent stellar evolution and sometimes reversing which component is more massive.

A Cepheid variable is a pulsating evolved star whose regular changes in stellar radius and temperature produce a repeating light curve. The kappa mechanism supplies driving in a suitable part of the instability strip. Large stellar radius gives a long dynamical time, connecting the pulsation period to the star's mean mass density.

The practical importance is the calibrated Cepheid period-luminosity relation. Measuring a period predicts an absolute magnitude within a specified population and spectral band; comparison with apparent magnitude then constrains distance. Extinction, composition and unresolved companions affect that comparison. Thus the variable brightness acts as a physical ruler only after calibration, rather than every pulsating star having one universal luminosity at a given period.

An eclipsing binary is a binary star oriented so that one component passes in front of the other as seen by the observer. The changing blocked light produces repeated minima in the light curve. Eclipse depths depend on surface brightness and size as well as on the geometry, while durations constrain stellar radii relative to orbital separation and the orbital inclination.

When both components also have measured Doppler shifts, their velocity amplitudes supply a binary mass ratio and orbital scale. Combining these with the eclipse geometry can determine individual masses and stellar radii, providing direct tests of stellar structure. A deeper eclipse usually means more light was hidden; it does not by itself identify the more massive component.

For a detached double-lined binary, radial velocities supply an orbital length scale times $\sin i$, while eclipse geometry supplies inclination and relative radii. Together they determine physical stellar radii. Comparing them with angular radii from a calibrated surface-brightness/colour relation gives distance. The orbital scale is geometric, but the angular-radius calibration, extinction and third light add astrophysical assumptions.^[ref]

An evolved star with substantially larger stellar radius and luminosity than a main sequence star of similar effective temperature. A red giant is a cool example; giant does not mean merely any star of large mass.

A Hertzsprung-Russell diagram plots stellar luminosity against effective temperature or a calibrated spectral classification. Conventionally, high luminosity is upward and high temperature is to the left. The Stefan–Boltzmann law, $L=4\pi R_{\star }^2\sigma T_{\mathrm{eff}}^4$, explains why stars of equal temperature but different luminosities must have different stellar radii.

The main sequence crosses the diagram, giant stars occupy a luminous region, and white dwarfs lie at low luminosity despite their high temperatures. An evolutionary track follows one model star through this space; a population diagram instead combines many stars at once. A colour-magnitude diagram is the observational counterpart, requiring distance, extinction and spectral calibration for the conversion.

A neutron star merger, or a neutron star tidally disrupted by a black hole outside its capture region, can leave a hot accretion disk around the remnant. Rapid accretion can power a relativistic jet and a short gamma-ray burst. Beaming means that an observer must lie sufficiently near the jet axis, and not every merger produces an observable burst. A clean binary black hole merger has no substantial baryonic fuel and is not ordinarily expected to power this mechanism. Disruption in a neutron-star–black-hole pair depends on binary mass ratio, black-hole spin and the neutron star's stellar radius.

A stable sinusoidal radial-velocity semi-amplitude can be stellar reflex motion caused by a companion on a nearly circular orbit. The amplitude is compatible with a giant planet; a low-mass star or brown dwarf viewed nearly face-on can mimic the same projected motion, but requires an increasingly unlikely orientation. Starspots and magnetically suppressed convection can produce a rotational stellar activity signal on a ten-day timescale; contemporaneous photometry, activity indicators and stellar spectral-line bisector and other profile changes distinguish these from a clean common Doppler shift. Solar-like stellar oscillations ordinarily have much shorter periods, so a coherent ten-day oscillation of an otherwise ordinary solar-type dwarf is less plausible. Instrumental drift, sampling aliases and blended spectra also need checking. A sinusoid alone does not establish a planetary origin, and the data do not assign numerical probabilities to these alternatives.

For the minimum companion mass from radial velocity, take a circular two-body orbit and initially $M_{\star }=M_{\odot }$. The exact relation and its low-mass limit areWith $\sin i=1$,Here $a=[G{M}_{\star }{P}^2/(4{\pi }^2){]}^{1/3}$ is the relative orbital semi-major axis. Nonzero orbital eccentricity multiplies the inferred $M_p\sin i$ by $\sqrt{1-e^2}$ at fixed measured $K,P$, but the sinusoidal model motivates $e=0$ here.

For the radial-velocity sensitivity limit at fixed planet mass, use $K=M_p\sin i\sqrt{G/(M_{\star }a)}$ and interpret the stated detection scale as a semi-amplitude threshold $K_{\min }$. The largest distance occurs for $\sin i=1$:For an inclination $i$, this boundary is smaller by ${\sin }^{2}i$. The result assumes adequate time coverage and neglects the stipulated stellar noise. If the detection scale instead denotes a full peak-to-peak excursion, set $K_{\min }$ to half that scale; $a_{\max }$ then increases fourfold.

The stellar-mass scaling of radial-velocity planet estimates changes these inferences because Kepler's third law and the stellar reflex response depend on the stellar mass. At fixed $K,P$, $M_p\sin i\propto M_{\star }^{2/3}$ and $a\propto M_{\star }^{1/3}$, whereas the fixed-mass detectability boundary scales as $M_{\star }^{-1}$. ThereforeThe observed period and amplitude are unchanged. The stellar radius does not enter these leading dynamical estimates, but is crucial for the exoplanet transit inference.

For the transiting companion, assume an opaque spherical planet, negligible transit dilution and negligible limb darkening. Its radius ratio is $k=R_p/R_{\star }=\sqrt{\delta }=0.03873$, henceUsing the revised stellar mass and a circular orbit gives $a=0.01850\mathrm{au}$ and $A=a/R_{\star }=7.957$. Interpret the duration as the total first-to-fourth-contact duration $T_{14}$. The impact parameter from total transit duration follows from the total duration of a circular planetary transit:This is noncentral but not grazing: $b<1-k$. The small-planet straight-chord approximation gives $b\simeq 0.845$; retaining finite $R_p$ and orbital curvature gives the stated value. A duration measured between other contacts needs the corresponding contact formula. Unknown orbital eccentricity and argument of periapsis change the transverse speed and prevent a unique unconstrained $b$; the numerical estimate is conditional on the stated circular model.^[ref]

Because the transit constrains $\sin i\simeq 0.994$, the RV nondetection now bounds the actual planetary mass, rather than only its projected mass. The bulk-density upper limit from a transit and an RV nondetection isThese bounds assume the instrumental threshold can be applied to a fitted signal at the transit period; no statistical confidence level is specified. Such a large radius at this low mass is inconsistent with an ordinary compact rock-and-iron body. A low-density volatile-rich planet, possibly with an extended H/He envelope, is indicated under the planetary interpretation. The observations do not uniquely determine interior composition, atmospheric abundance or formation history; blended eclipses and activity still require validation. There is no luminosity or effective temperature supplied for the host, so a numerical planetary equilibrium temperature cannot be inferred from these data alone.

The numerical conversions above use externally documented $(GM{)}_{\odot }=1.3271244\times 10^{20}{\mathrm{m}}^3{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, $R_{\odot }=6.957\times 10^8\mathrm{m}$, $M_{\oplus }=5.9722\times 10^{24}\mathrm{kg}$, $R_{\oplus }=6.371\times 10^6\mathrm{m}$, $M_J=1.89813\times 10^{27}\mathrm{kg}$, $G=6.67430\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and $1\mathrm{au}=149597870700\mathrm{m}$. They are conversion constants, not additional measured system parameters.^[ref][ref]

Adopt circular orbits, negligible planetary masses, spherical bodies, uniform stellar brightness and no transit dilution. Interpret the measured duration as the total duration of a circular planetary transit, from first to fourth contact, $T_{14}$. These conventions matter especially for the off-centre crossing: finite planet size cannot automatically be ignored there. Unknown orbital eccentricity or limb darkening would require further information to infer unique stellar radii.

First convert the apparent magnitude difference into a fractional exoplanet transit depth, rather than treating a milli-magnitude as a part in a thousand:Both crossings are non-grazing because their transit impact parameters satisfy $b<1-k$, so the full projected planetary disc can block the star. Equal depths determine equal radius ratios, not equal absolute planet radii.

For orbital inclination $i$ measured from the sky plane, $b=(a/R_{\star })\cos i$. Choosing mid-transit as orbital phase zero, the projected separation obeysAt first and fourth contact, $z/R_{\star }=1+k$. The full crossing duration therefore isFor the numerical scale use solar radius $R_{\odot }=6.957\times 10^8\mathrm{m}$ and nominal solar mass parameter $(GM{)}_{\odot }=1.3271244\times 10^{20}{\mathrm{m}}^3{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, with one day equal to $86400\mathrm{s}$. These are stated conversion choices, not additional measurements of the two systems.^[ref]

Kepler's third law gives $a=[G{M}_{\star }{P}^2/(4{\pi }^2){]}^{1/3}$. For a solar-mass, solar-radius host, this gives $a/R_{\odot }=12.3051$ at five days and $6.68023$ at two days. Substitution in the contact formula yieldsThe transit duration of a small planet instead takes both $k\to 0$ and $R_{\star }/a\ll 1$, giving $T\simeq P{R}_{\star }\sqrt{1-b^2}/(\pi a)$. It predicts $3.10\mathrm{h}$ and $1.37\mathrm{h}$, respectively. The difference is appreciable for B because the fractional change in its crossing chord is larger. Durations defined by mid-ingress to mid-egress or by second to third contact should not be silently equated with $T_{14}$.

The original diagram uses a straight projected track to display the contact geometry; the duration formula above retains orbital curvature.

To infer the actual stellar radii, invert the contact formula before applying the supplied mass-radius scaling. Let $A=a/R_{\star }$ and $s=\sin (\pi T_{14}/P)$; thenThe measured durations imply $A_A=8.34661$ and $A_B=7.55743$. Normalize the stipulated constant mass-radius ratio to the Sun, so $M_{\star }/M_{\odot }=R_{\star }/R_{\odot }\equiv r_{\star }$. Kepler's third law then givesThus the stellar radius from transit duration and a linear mass-radius relation isThe same assumed scaling gives $M_A=1.79M_{\odot }$ and $M_B=0.831M_{\odot }$. A's longer crossing requires a lower mean stellar mass density, while B's shorter full-contact crossing requires a higher one. They are not both solar replicas under this model. Their planets have $R_{p,A}=0.1213R_{\odot }$ and $R_{p,B}=0.05633R_{\odot }$.

For a consistently applied point-planet approximation, the duration scales as $T\propto P^{1/3}{r}_{\star }^{2/3}\sqrt{1-b^2}$ and the inferred radii would instead be $R_A\simeq 1.98R_{\odot }$, $R_B\simeq 1.07R_{\odot }$. The latter is close to solar. Consequently the assertion of a substantial non-solar radius for B depends on which duration convention and finite-size approximation are intended. The contact-based values above use the measured depth rather than discarding it. If eccentric orbits are allowed, the transit speed introduces an additional factor depending on eccentricity and orientation, so the two durations alone cannot establish those radii uniquely.

For an outer coplanar planet around B, the common orbital inclination gives $b_2/b_B=a_2/a_B=(P_2/P_B{)}^{2/3}$. A point-planet centre must cross the stellar disc, requiring $b_2<1$. The usual coplanar transit limit is thereforeThis is a limiting value approached from below; a tangent path has no duration. For an outer planet of finite, unspecified radius ratio $k_2$, any overlap instead requires $b_2<1+k_2$, giving $P_2<P_B[(1+k_2)/b_B{]}^{3/2}$. If it had the same ratio $k_2=k$, that geometric limit would be $3.08$ days; requiring full overlap would give $2.52$ days. Because neither its radius nor a photometric detection threshold is supplied, no unique finite-size practical maximum period can be inferred beyond this conditional expression. The stellar radius cancels from the point-planet period-ratio bound.

For B's inner planet, a reflected-light planetary phase curve haswhere $A_g$ is geometric albedo and $\alpha$ is phase angle. Near exoplanet secondary eclipse the visible hemisphere is almost fully illuminated. Using the standard full-phase approximation and the contact-based $A_B$,The exact lost fraction of combined stellar and planetary light is $F_p/(F_{\star }+F_p)$, which changes the result negligibly at this contrast. The corresponding magnitude depth is about $0.0437$ milli-magnitudes. The circular orbit has the same impact distance at eclipse as at transit, and $b_B<1-k$, so the star can hide the entire planetary disc.

The inclination inferred for B is $83.92^{\circ }$, putting closest approach to full phase at $\alpha \simeq 6.08^{\circ }$. A fully precise prediction would therefore also require the reflected-light phase function, which the question does not specify; the boxed value uses $\Phi \simeq 1$. The consistent point-planet duration approximation yields about $56.7\mathrm{ppm}$ instead, through its different inferred $a/R_B$. It is important to keep the geometry used for the radius inference and the reflected-light calculation consistent.

Finally, the stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude for a low-mass companion on a circular orbit isThe two stars' equal apparent magnitudes make a comparison at similar photon statistics plausible, though spectral-line widths, stellar variability and observing cadence can still differ. With the contact-based stellar estimates,If the planets have comparable mean densities, A is easier: their equal depth then gives $M_{p,A}/M_{p,B}\simeq (R_A/R_B{)}^3\simeq 9.99$, so $K_A/K_B\simeq 4.44$. The larger planetary mass outweighs A's longer orbital period and larger host mass. For equal planetary masses, B is easier by a factor $2.25$ in amplitude. The supplied transit data give planet radii, not masses, so the ranking is conditional on a planetary mass-radius assumption; a unique unconditional ranking would invent information.

An astronomical interferometer combines light from collectors separated by projected interferometric baseline $\mathbf{B}$. For a distant, narrowband, spatially incoherent source, the Van Cittert-Zernike theorem gives normalized complex visibilityThe resolving scale is $\lambda /B$, while the individual collector and beam combiner restrict the field of view. Delay lines compensate geometric path differences. To see broadband fringes, residual optical path length mismatch must lie within the coherence length of order ${\lambda }^2/\Delta \lambda$; fringe tracking follows rapidly changing atmospheric piston in interferometry. Baseline changes and Earth-rotation aperture synthesis sample additional spatial frequencies.

For an ideal uniform circular star of full angular diameter $\Theta$,Real limb darkening changes the conversion. Several baselines constrain binaries, stellar radii and circumstellar structure; orbital angular separations combined with radial velocities can give physical orbital scales. calibration stars test contrast losses, alongside wavelength, photometric imbalance, polarization and bandwidth controls. For three collectors the closure phase cancels telescope-based phase errors: ${\varphi }_{12}+{\varphi }_{23}+{\varphi }_{31}$ retains source asymmetry information. Sparse baseline coverage still leaves image/model ambiguities.

In stellar intensity interferometry, thermal-light correlations instead give $g^{(2)}(0)-1=|g^{(1)}{|}^2$ for an ideal single-polarization resolved temporal mode. The Sirius experiment correlated separate detector outputs rather than optically combining the beams.^[ref] Pure atmospheric phase shifts do not alter local intensities, but finite detector bandwidth dilutes the correlation and photon statistics limit sensitivity; the two-detector observable also loses the complex phase.

TODO: the plotted location of Procyon B is missing from the damaged source diagram. The Stefan–Boltzmann law would determine the stellar radius from its effective temperature and bolometric luminosity:A visual luminosity alone must first be converted with the appropriate bolometric correction. Procyon B is a white dwarf, so its small stellar radius and hot surface place it below the main sequence, rather than among giant stars or supergiants. This classification does not supply the missing numerical coordinates. A source-based numerical stellar radius cannot be claimed from the surviving image.^[ref]

Transit photometry. A planet crossing the stellar disc produces a periodic reduction in flux, approximately $\delta =(R_p/R_{\ast }{)}^2$ for a small, dark planet away from the limb. The orbital period and stellar radius allow an inferred planetary radius, but not its mass by this method alone. The geometric geometric transit probability is roughly $(R_{\ast }+R_p)/a$ for a circular orbit, so the method strongly favours close orbits and large planets. Small signals compete with instrumental noise and stellar activity; eclipsing stellar binaries and blended sources can mimic a planetary exoplanet transit, and long orbital periods require long observing baselines.

Doppler spectroscopy. Periodic shifts of stellar spectral lines reveal the stellar radial velocity caused by motion around the centre of mass. For a light companion, $K\propto M_p\sin i{P}^{-1/3}{M}_{\ast }^{-2/3}/\sqrt{1-e^2}$, favouring massive, short-period companions and low-mass host stars. Unknown orbital inclination gives a minimum mass; stellar activity, line broadening, and instrumental calibration limit precision. Long orbital periods require years of measurements.

Direct imaging. Spatially resolved reflected light or thermal emission separates a planet from its host. The large star–planet brightness contrast and small angular separation demand starlight suppression and precise correction of optical aberrations. The method favours wide orbits around nearby stars, and young, hot, massive planets with stronger thermal emission. Translating brightness to mass depends on planetary cooling models and age; it is difficult to image an Earth analogue close to a bright star.

A white dwarf companion in the nearby Procyon binary system. A measured bolometric luminosity $L$ and effective temperature $T$ give its stellar radius through $R=\sqrt{L/(4\pi \sigma T^4)}$.^[ref]

A red dwarf is a cool, low-mass main-sequence star supported by sustained core hydrogen burning. Its small radiating area and low effective temperature make it faint compared with the Sun. A brown dwarf may have a similar radius but does not sustain that same long-lived hydrogen-burning state.

The lowest-mass red dwarfs are approximately fully convective stars. Mixing can bring fresh hydrogen into the burning region instead of leaving most fuel isolated in an envelope. Their low luminosity relative to available fuel therefore permits long main-sequence lifetimes. A small stellar radius also makes a given exoplanet block a larger fraction of the disc, improving the geometric signal in exoplanet transit photometry.

A Roche lobe is the region around one member of a circular, synchronously rotating binary star bounded by the critical effective potential surface through the inner Lagrange point. The two lobes meet at that saddle point. The construction includes the gravitational effects of both stars and the centrifugal contribution in the rotating frame; it is not simply a sphere at a fixed distance from one star.

A star that expands to fill this region can lose gas through Roche-lobe overflow. A volume-equivalent radius provides a convenient single size for the nonspherical lobe, allowing comparison with a model stellar radius. Changing the binary mass ratio or orbital separation changes that size, so orbital evolution can initiate transfer even without intrinsic stellar expansion.

Roche-lobe overflow is mass transfer that begins when a donor star fills its Roche lobe. Gas near the inner Lagrange point can pass through the saddle in the rotating-frame effective potential toward the companion. Its orbital angular momentum can prevent direct radial infall and instead produce an accretion disk, depending on the geometry.

The process couples stellar evolution to orbital evolution. Losing mass changes the donor's stellar radius, while transferred or escaping matter changes the Roche lobe. Dynamical stability of binary mass transfer depends on which response dominates. Stable transfer can gradually strip an envelope; unstable interaction can lead to a common envelope. Case A mass transfer and Case B mass transfer distinguish the donor's nuclear state when overflow starts.

A star is a self-gravitating astronomical body whose luminous life is governed by the competition between gravity, internal pressure, energy loss and nuclear fusion. A main-sequence star sustains core hydrogen burning; a pre-main-sequence star is still contracting toward that stage, while evolved stars can burn different fuels or in shells. The name therefore includes more than the currently hydrogen-burning phase.

Hydrostatic equilibrium relates the inward pull of gravity to an outward pressure gradient. Radiative transfer and convection carry energy through the interior, and the photosphere supplies much of the observed spectrum. Mass, composition, age and interactions determine the resulting stellar radius and luminosity. The Sun offers a nearby example in which resolved observations and solar neutrino detection test different parts of the same physical picture.

Stellar evolution is the change of a star's composition, structure and observable properties over time. Nuclear fusion changes the core's composition and available fuel; gravity, energy transport and mass loss then alter the stellar radius, luminosity and effective temperature. The initial mass strongly influences the sequence, but composition, rotation and binary mass transfer also matter.

The evolution of a solar-mass star connects the main sequence to giant phases and eventually a white dwarf. More massive stars can reach stellar core collapse. An evolutionary track in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram makes these changes visible, while comparisons with coeval stellar populations test the predicted lifetimes. Two stars with similar present appearance can have different prior histories, especially after binary interaction.

A stellar radius is the radius assigned to a star using a stated surface convention. A gaseous star has no sharp solid boundary: in a model, a commonly used reference is a layer near outward optical depth of order one. Different spectral bands can sample different layers, particularly in very extended stellar atmospheres.

For an approximately spherical star, a measured angular diameter $\theta$ and distance $d$ give $R_{\star }\simeq d\theta /2$ for small $\theta$ in radians. Alternatively, luminosity and effective temperature give $L=4\pi R_{\star }^2\sigma T_{\mathrm{eff}}^4$ through the Stefan–Boltzmann law. Eclipsing binaries offer another route through orbital geometry. This measurement matters directly for exoplanet transit photometry, whose exoplanet transit depth primarily supplies the planet-to-star radius ratio.

Assume Kepler's third law, a negligible planet mass, and $M_{\star }/M_{\odot }=R_{\star }/R_{\odot }$. Define $A_{\odot }=[(GM{)}_{\odot }{P}^2/(4{\pi }^2){]}^{1/3}/R_{\odot }$. The total duration of a circular planetary transit determines $a/R_{\star }$, giving the displayed stellar radius. Unknown orbital eccentricity, transit dilution or a different stellar mass-radius calibration introduces additional uncertainty.