Let , using real-valued smooth and a fixed bounded region. Differentiation under the integral sign and Green's first identity yield
The boundary term vanishes because on , and the heat equation gives in . Consequently
The integrand is continuous and nonnegative. Thus at any fixed time, equality is equivalent to everywhere in , also giving there at that time. This proves Dirichlet energy dissipation for the heat equation.
The boundary condition fixes the boundary temperature in time; it is not a zero normal derivative condition. No sign condition on is used. The stated smoothness licenses the time derivative, spatial integration by parts and boundary trace; without that regularity an appropriate weak energy argument would be required.
Put . Then on , and the constant does not change a gradient, so . Expand the unnormalized Dirichlet energy:
The cross term is zero by Green's first identity:
Thus the useful stronger identity is
Equality holds exactly when has zero gradient. It is then constant on every connected component and zero on that component’s boundary, hence . Therefore equality holds precisely when throughout . This is the Dirichlet principle; an additive boundary constant does not alter the minimizing energy. The energy here omits the optional factor , which does not affect minimizers or the inequality.
Work with real-valued smooth functions on the bounded region enclosed by , with the oriented surface element pointing outward. Set . It is a harmonic function in and has zero Dirichlet boundary conditions on . Applying Green's first identity to with itself gives
Both terms on the right vanish by the boundary condition and harmonicity. The integrand is nonnegative and continuous, so throughout . Consequently is constant on each connected component; every bounded component meets the prescribed boundary, where that constant is zero. Therefore
This is the energy proof of Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem. Connectedness of is not essential if the boundary values are prescribed on every component. Boundedness, or suitable decay and integrability at infinity, is needed for the boundary/energy argument; the finite enclosed-volume interpretation is used here.
The directional derivative along the specified vector field gives
Use the magnitude formula for the curvature of an integral curve of a vector field:
It vanishes on the plane and on the axis away from the origin, consistent with straight field lines there. At the origin the vector field vanishes, so it fails the nowhere-zero hypothesis and this field-line curvature is not defined.
As an independent geometric check, an integral curve of a vector field satisfies , , , giving . Its velocity is and acceleration ; the ordinary curvature of a space curve formula gives the same expression.
Let and choose an orientation of a regular curve following the vector field. Its unit tangent vector is , where is constant along a connected regular segment. Arc length differentiation along that curve is . Therefore
Taking the cross product with removes the term parallel to :
Where the Frenet frame exists, . Thus
The printed sign corresponds to orientation along or against the field. Taking magnitudes gives the orientation-independent curvature of an integral curve of a vector field, . This scalar formula also applies at zero curvature, where itself may be undefined.
For an arc-length parametrization, the unit tangent vector is , with . Its derivative is perpendicular to . The curvature of a space curve is ; where , its principal normal vector is , so . The binormal vector completes the positively oriented Frenet frame.
Differentiate to get . Also
Thus has only an component. Define the torsion of a space curve by , giving .
Next, , and differentiating the other inner products gives and . Hence the Frenet-Serret formulas are
These statements require enough smoothness, for example a curve with positive curvature on the interval under discussion. If , the unit tangent vector is still defined, but the standard principal normal vector, binormal vector and torsion of a space curve need not be; their existence cannot be inferred just from smoothness of the curve.
Let and use the floor function to choose
Interpret an empty integer interval as an empty sum. These bounds give exactly the event , where has the binomial distribution of parameters . Since , the central limit theorem for a sum of independent Bernoulli distribution variables gives convergence in distribution of that standardized count to the standard normal distribution. Its cumulative distribution function is continuous at both endpoints, so
The TeX's additional malformed inequality involving and is absent from the PDF and is not a condition on the requested integers.
For fixed and sufficiently large ,
The finite product and last factor tend to one, while . Thus the Poisson limit theorem gives
These numbers form a probability mass function because they are nonnegative and their sum is , by the exponential series. They define the Poisson distribution of parameter . Only is needed to make the binomial parameter valid, which is sufficient for the limit.
The binomial theorem makes the sum of the proposed probability mass function equal to ; every term is nonnegative. Realize the associated binomial distribution as , where the are independent variables with the Bernoulli distribution of parameter . Each has expected value and variance . Linearity of expectation and variance additivity for independent random variables yield
At or this is a constant random variable; the same formulas apply, with the endpoint mass understood by continuity.
Choose and , so . The Jacobian determinant of the coordinate change is two, so it is an invertible linear map. By the chain rule, and . Consequently
This is the wave equation with . The D'Alembert formula is , with arbitrary twice differentiable functions . Returning to the old coordinates and absorbing factors of two into the arbitrary functions gives
Direct differentiation checks the cancellation. Equivalently, first integrating produces the same two-function family.
For real initial data, separation of variables gives
This includes , whose solution is identically zero. Every other real has a pole at , so only gives a finite solution on the whole real line. If complex-valued initial data are allowed, a nonreal has no real-time pole; the whole-real-line conclusion here uses the usual real-valued differential-equation convention.
Along a characteristic curve , the chain rule gives . For the homogeneous transport equation this is zero, so . For the nonlinear equation, the same method of characteristics reduces the problem to , with initial value . Therefore
For differentiable real , this is the classical solution wherever its denominator is nonzero, on the characteristic intervals containing the initial line. If for some , that characteristic blows up at , . Thus the only real-valued solution bounded on all of has , giving .
For , differentiate and use the angular derivative . The polar coordinates satisfy
Hence the rotation is clockwise. The origin is an unstable equilibrium, while is a limit cycle of period . Writing gives the logistic differential equation . For ,
All nonzero solutions tend to the unit-circle attracting limit cycle as , spiralling outward for and inward for . For the solution exists for every real time and approaches the origin as ; for it remains periodic in both time directions. For , the denominator first vanishes at
This finite-time blow-up of an ordinary differential equation occurs backward in time. Such exterior solutions have no behavior: their maximal time interval is . The zero solution exists for all time and has no defined polar angle.
Use the complete system in the PDF: the TeX omits . Both coordinate axes are invariant, and the equilibrium points are , and . The Jacobian matrix is
At its eigenvalues are , and at they are : both points are saddle equilibria. At the coexistence point,
Thus the interior point is a stable spiral. The nontrivial nullclines are and : increases below the first and decreases above it, while increases to the right of the second and decreases to the left. The rotation near coexistence is counterclockwise.
A local linearization by itself does not prove that every interior solution has the same limit. For this logistic predator-prey model, let and use the Lyapunov function
The inequality makes nonnegative, with equality only at coexistence. Its sublevel sets are compact inside the positive quadrant, because diverges both at the axes and at infinity. Direct differentiation cancels the predator-prey cross terms and gives
On one has , and remaining there requires . The largest invariant subset is therefore the coexistence point. The LaSalle invariance principle proves
On , decays as toward the origin. On , the logistic differential equation takes every to one. The origin itself stays fixed. These boundary trajectories are the exceptions to the interior convergence statement.
The PDF gives , the Heaviside step function; the TeX incorrectly changes this to . A unit voltage step has derivative the Dirac delta function, so the current is the causal Green function for .
The current must be continuous at zero: a jump would create a delta derivative through , absent on the right-hand side. Integrating across zero therefore gives , so and . Put
These distinct negative characteristic roots give the overdamped RLC response
Together with for , this solves the step response. The eventual current is zero: the capacitor charges and blocks steady current in the series RLC circuit.
With no electrical resistance or applied electric potential difference, divide the equation by the inductance to get a simple harmonic oscillator with angular frequency . Its general real solution is
Each nonzero solution has period . Here is an angular frequency; the ordinary frequency in cycles per unit time is .
The conditional density gives
using either integration by parts or the expected value of an exponential distribution. Hence
This is a finite value for almost every realization of , but not an integrable random variable: . Since , its conditional expectation remains well-defined in the nonnegative, extended-expectation sense; the tower property of conditional expectation then gives .
Integrate the joint probability density over to obtain the marginal density of :
Thus has an exponential distribution of rate one. Dividing the joint probability density by this marginal density gives the conditional density
Equivalently, has an exponential distribution of rate . The value at can be assigned arbitrarily: it is a probability-zero conditioning value and the density ratio there is not meaningful.
Put , so the same definition includes . Since and every is nonzero,
The factor is a discrete integrating factor for this variable-coefficient affine recurrence. Sum the increments as a telescoping series and multiply back by :
The identity requires no assumption that the coefficients have the same sign.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.