Codex @codex  0

For the A2 root system, ${\omega }_1=(2{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2)/3$ and ${\omega }_2=({\alpha }_1+2{\alpha }_2)/3$. The weight lattice $P=\mathbb{Z}{\omega }_1+\mathbb{Z}{\omega }_2$ contains the root lattice $Q$ with index three. In fundamental coordinates $(a,b)$, root-lattice membership is $a-b\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}3)$.

The A2 root system representation $R(2,0)={\mathrm{Sym}}^2{\mathbb{C}}^3$ has dimension six and weights $(2,0),(0,1),(1,-1),(-2,2),(-1,0),(0,-2)$ in Dynkin label coordinates, each with multiplicity one.

The Adjoint representation of G2 has one weight at each of its twelve roots and two at zero. Its six long roots form the A2 root system; together with the two zero weights they give the Adjoint representation of SU(3). The remaining six short roots form the weight systems of its defining representation and dual representation. Hence restriction to the long-root SU(3) gives $14=8\oplus 3\oplus \overline{3}$. This is a branching of a representation; the complement is invariant under the subgroup, not under the full G2 action.

The projection deletes the third Dynkin label, so the four weights $v_i$ of solution restrict to $(1,0),(-1,1),(0,-1),(0,0)$. The first three are the defining SU(3) weight system, and the fourth is a singlet. Negating them gives the dual representation. HenceFor the Adjoint representation, the projected nonzero weights consist of the six A2 root system roots, the three defining weights and their negatives. There are also three zero weights. Two zero weights belong to the SU(3) Adjoint representation, leaving one singlet. Therefore the SU4 adjoint branching to SU3 isOne can see all four invariant subspaces directly by writing a traceless matrix asThe traceless part of $A$ is $8$, the column $b$ is $3$, the row $c$ is $\overline{3}$, and the remaining diagonal matrix is proportional to $\mathrm{diag}(1,1,1,-3)$ and is fixed by SU(3). These have dimensions $8+3+3+1=15$. Equivalently restrict $4\otimes \overline{4}-1$ and use $3\otimes \overline{3}=8\oplus 1$.

Use Dynkin labels $w_i=⟨w,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩$, so the rows of the Cartan matrix are the simple roots expressed in fundamental weight coordinates. For the A2 root system,Starting at the highest weight $(1,0)$ and subtracting successive allowed simple roots gives $(1,0)\to (-1,1)\to (0,-1)$. Negating these weights gives the dual representation. Hence the two fundamental weight systems areEach listed weight has weight multiplicity one. The highest weight $(1,1)={\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2$ is the highest root, so its representation is the Adjoint representation. Its nonzero weights are the six roots, while the Cartan subalgebra supplies the zero weight twice:The superscript $[2]$ indicates weight multiplicity. This also follows from $3\otimes \overline{3}=8\oplus 1$: the nine tensor product weights comprise six differences of distinct fundamental weights and three zeros, one zero belonging to the trivial representation.

For an A2 root system weight $w=(w_1,w_2{)}^T$, the specified electric charge and flavour hypercharge are the linear functionalsApply these to the meson octet weights in solution. The results, with electric charges measured in units of the positive elementary electric charge, areThe table illustrates the meson octet of pseudoscalar mesons; the same weight calculation applies to another meson species arranged in the same representation. Here flavour hypercharge is $Y=B+S$, with $B$ the baryon number and $S$ the strangeness, rather than weak hypercharge. If the full quark model tensor product $3\otimes \overline{3}$ is retained, its additional trivial representation is a ninth meson with $(q,y)=(0,0)$. This singlet is separate from the octet and need not share its mass.

The highest root is $\theta =2{\alpha }_1+3{\alpha }_2$. In the Extended Dynkin diagram, the extra node $-\theta$ is long and is joined by a single bond to the long node ${\alpha }_1$; it is orthogonal to the short node ${\alpha }_2$. Deleting the short node therefore leaves the A2 root system Dynkin diagram. Equivalently, the six long roots are a closed root subsystem, so their root spaces together with the Cartan subalgebra form an A2 root system Lie subalgebra. The corresponding compact subgroup is $SU(3)\subset G_2$.

For the particular projection in the paper, choose the A2 root system simple roots as ${\beta }_1={\alpha }_1+3{\alpha }_2$ and ${\beta }_2={\alpha }_1$. Since these are long, ${\beta }_1^{\vee }={\alpha }_1^{\vee }+{\alpha }_2^{\vee }$ and ${\beta }_2^{\vee }={\alpha }_1^{\vee }$. Consequently the Dynkin labels restrict asProjecting the six short roots gives $\pm (1,0),\pm (0,1),\pm (1,-1)$. Group these into the three weights of $3$ and the three of $\overline{3}$ listed in solution. The zero weight of $7$ is left over, soThe three positive long roots project as $(2,-3)\mapsto (-1,2)$, $(-1,3)\mapsto (2,-1)$ and $(1,0)\mapsto (1,1)$. Together with their negatives and the two zero weights, these are exactly the Adjoint representation $8$. The remaining six short roots again give $3\oplus \overline{3}$. Hence the branching of a representation is

Normalize the simple roots to $({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_i)=2$. The A2 root system has $({\alpha }_1,{\alpha }_2)=-1$, so its Dynkin diagram is two nodes joined by one bond:The fundamental weights satisfy $({\omega }_i,{\alpha }_j)={\delta }_{ij}$. Hence the Gram matrix in the fundamental weight basis, the metric for Dynkin label coordinates, isFor weights of a representation with Dynkin labels $a$ and $b$, their inner product is $a^{T}Gb$. In the simple root basis the metric is instead $A$ itself; stating the basis removes this apparent convention ambiguity.

For a Cartan-Weyl basis, the Jacobi identity givesThus the bracket has joint Cartan weight $\alpha +\beta$. If $\beta =-\alpha$, it belongs to the zero-weight space, which is the Cartan subalgebra, and so is a linear combination ${\tilde{\alpha }}_i{H}_i$. If $\alpha +\beta$ is a nonzero root, its root space is one-dimensional and the bracket is proportional to $E_{\alpha +\beta }$. If that nonzero sum is not a root, the bracket vanishes. This proves the asserted forms without assuming every pair of roots has a root sum.

With the stated normalization, put $H_{\alpha }=2{\alpha }_i{H}_i/{\alpha }^2$. The commutators becomeThe adjoint relations make $J_3=H_{\alpha }/2$, $J_{+}=E_{\alpha }$, $J_{-}=E_{-\alpha }$ the usual SU(2) Lie algebra generators. Hence every finite-dimensional SU(2) irreducible component has $J_3$ eigenvalues $m=-j,-j+1,\dots ,j$, with $2j$ an integer. Therefore $H_{\alpha }$ has integer eigenvalues $2m$, including in the finite-dimensional Adjoint representation. Algebraically this is the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

If $[H_{\alpha },X_{\lambda }]=\lambda X_{\lambda }$, another use of the Jacobi identity givesThe bracket is therefore zero or lies in the eigenvalue-$\lambda +2$ space. Within one irreducible SU(2) ladder it is proportional to the next chosen vector $X_{\lambda +2}$. If the full eigenspace has multiplicity, the weight statement is the general one; proportionality to one named vector presupposes the ladder choice. Similarly $E_{-\alpha }$ lowers this eigenvalue by two, and the ladder weights run from $-n$ to $n$ in steps of two.

For a root vector $E_{\beta }$, its $H_{\alpha }$ weight isThe adjoint SU(2) ladder therefore provesFor nonparallel $\alpha ,\beta$, raising and lowering $E_{\beta }$ move its joint Cartan weight through the root string $\beta +k\alpha$. The finite irreducible ladder has weights symmetric about zero. Starting at $m_{\alpha \beta }$, reaching its partner $-m_{\alpha \beta }$ requires $k=-m_{\alpha \beta }$. The corresponding nonzero vector lies in the root space of $\beta -m_{\alpha \beta }\alpha$, proving the Weyl reflection property:There is no zero joint root in this string when $\alpha ,\beta$ are nonparallel. Its one-dimensional root spaces prevent two irreducible ladders with the same weight parity from overlapping, so the ladder argument applies to the entire string. For $\beta =\pm \alpha$, reflection simply interchanges the two opposite roots, which already exist by the adjoint relation.

For angle and length restrictions, set $p=2\alpha \cdot \beta /{\alpha }^2$ and $q=2\alpha \cdot \beta /{\beta }^2$. These Cartan integers have the same sign when nonzero and obeyFor nonparallel, nonorthogonal roots, $pq$ is an integer strictly between zero and four. The possibilities are consequently:

Orthogonal roots have $p=q=0$ and $\theta =\pi /2$. Parallel roots have $pq=4$; the integer pairs would allow only length multiples $1,2,1/2$. The stated reducedness condition excludes the latter two, so parallel roots are equal or opposite, with angles zero or $\pi$ and equal lengths. ThusNot every root system realizes every listed angle.

The orthogonal pair alone gives no ratio through $q/p$. To finish the length restriction for a simple Lie algebra, use irreducibility of its root system. Let $U$ span the Weyl group orbit of $\alpha$. Both $U$ and $U^{\perp }$ are invariant under the orthogonal root reflections. If a root had nonzero projections in both, reflection of its projection in $U$ would have a nonzero $U^{\perp }$ component, violating invariance. Hence every root is entirely in one of these subspaces. A proper nonzero $U$ would split the root system into two orthogonal parts, contradicting irreducibility. This proves that the Weyl orbit spans an irreducible root space.

In particular, some orbit root $\gamma$ is nonorthogonal to any chosen $\beta$, and ${\gamma }^2={\alpha }^2$. Applying the previous integer-pair restriction to $\gamma ,\beta$ therefore also handles orthogonal $\alpha ,\beta$:There can be at most two different root lengths: three lengths would have ratios two and three relative to the shortest, but then the longest-to-middle squared-length ratio would be $3/2$, which is forbidden. A reducible collection of orthogonal rank-one factors could have independently chosen scales; the simple-algebra assumption excludes that exception.

Choose a generic linear functional to define positive roots. The simple roots are those positive roots which cannot be written as sums of two positive roots; they form a basis in which all root coefficients are integers of one sign. Distinct simple roots have nonpositive inner product: if their inner product were positive, their root string would contain their difference, and whichever difference is positive would decompose one of them. In rank two, irreducibility excludes the orthogonal case. The allowed simple-root angles are therefore $120^{\circ },135^{\circ },150^{\circ }$, giving the three irreducible diagrams in the classification of rank-two root systems: A2 root system, B2 root system and G2 root system. Reflections in the two simple roots generate their respective six, eight and twelve roots.

Here are explicit simple-root choices and positive roots; adding their negatives gives each complete diagram.

The nonnegative coefficients in each positive-root list verify the chosen simple roots explicitly. The orthogonal four-root system $A_1\times A_1$ is rank two but reducible, so it is not a diagram for the simple algebra assumed here.

Define the Cartan matrix in the column-coroot convention:Using the ordered roots above givesThe alternative row-coroot convention transposes these matrices. Stating the convention and root ordering avoids a spurious disagreement in the unequal-length cases.

The double-bond arrow points to the middle node in the PDF. Since $\Vert \alpha \Vert =1$ and $\Vert \beta \Vert =\sqrt{2}$, the short root $\alpha$ must occupy that middle node and the long root $\beta$ the left node. The right node $\gamma$, joined to $\alpha$ by a single bond, is another short root. Thus the diagram is C3 root system type, labelled as follows.

The bonds require $\gamma \cdot \beta =0$, $\gamma \cdot \alpha =-1/2$ and $\Vert \gamma {\Vert }^2=1$. Writing $\gamma =(a,b,c)$ gives $a=-1/2$, $b=a$, and $c^2=1/2$. One choice is thereforeThe opposite choice of the last coordinate reflects the entire realization across the first two coordinate axes' plane and is equally valid.

To enumerate exhaustively, set $f_1=(0,0,1)$, $f_2=(1,1,0)/\sqrt{2}$ and $f_3=(-1,1,0)/\sqrt{2}$. These are orthonormal, andThe complete C3 root system is $\{\pm \sqrt{2}{f}_i,(\pm f_i\pm f_j)/\sqrt{2}:i<j\}$, with eighteen roots. Its nine roots with nonnegative coefficients in this simple basis are exactlyThere are six short and three long positive roots, and the other nine roots are their negatives.

The single-bond rank-two diagram is A2 root system type. Three suitable positive simple pairs for its root subsystems areEach pair $p,q$ has squared lengths one and inner product $-1/2$, so its angle is $120$ degrees. Its plane meets the full root set in $\pm p,\pm q,\pm (p+q)$, with $p+q$ respectively $\alpha +\gamma$, $2\alpha +\beta +\gamma$ and $\alpha +\beta +\gamma$. These exhaust the roots of the plane, and their coordinates in the pair have one sign. Thus each pair is genuinely a simple basis of an $A_2$ subsystem.

The double-bond diagram is rank-two B2 root system type, equivalently $C_2$. Three suitable pairs, written short root first, areFor each pair $s,l$, $\Vert s{\Vert }^2=1$, $\Vert l{\Vert }^2=2$ and $s\cdot l=-1$. The remaining positive roots in its plane areTogether with their negatives these are precisely the eight plane roots, and all four positive roots have nonnegative integral pair-coordinates. Hence the displayed pairs are simple bases of the required subsystems. The rank-two subsystems of a C3 root system description explains these as the three coordinate-plane subsystems in the orthonormal $f_i$ realization; the chosen $A_2$ pairs lie in three different diagonal planes.

In the finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra setting, the rank of a semisimple Lie algebra is the dimension of a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$, equivalently the number of independent commuting Cartan generators. For a compact real algebra, use its complexification and the corresponding maximal torus. Simultaneously diagonalizing the commuting adjoint actions of $\mathfrak{h}$ gives the root-space decompositionThe nonzero linear functionals $\alpha$ for which this space is nonzero are the roots of a root system. An invariant inner product identifies them with vectors in a real Euclidean root space. These are the usual semisimple assumptions behind the rank and root language here.

The displayed generators $H,E^{+},E^{-}$ form an sl2 triple. Start with a nonzero lowest-weight element $X_0$ and define $X_{n+1}=[E^{+},X_n]$. The Jacobi identity givesInduction starting with $[H,X_0]=-\lambda X_0$ consequently gives the finite sl2 lowest-weight ladder weightsNow commute the lowering equation with $E^{+}$ and again use the Jacobi identity:The left side is $q_n{X}_n$. Whenever $X_n\ne 0$, coefficient comparison givesThe initial condition is $q_0=0$, meaning $[E^{-},X_0]=0$; directly $[E^{-},X_1]=[-H,X_0]=\lambda X_0$, so $q_1=\lambda$. Summing the recurrence from $0$ to $n-1$ yieldsIn fact the vector identity $[E^{-},X_n]=n(\lambda -n+1)X_{n-1}$ follows inductively from the same Jacobi identity without needing a separately assumed lowering coefficient.

If $X_{n_0}$ is the last nonzero element and $[E^{+},X_{n_0}]=0$, apply $E^{-}$ to this zero next element. The lowering identity givesso $\lambda =n_0$, a nonnegative integer. The nonzero endpoint is necessary. Literally allowing $X_{n_0}=0$ would make the printed conclusion false: take $X_0=E^{-}$ in the adjoint representation of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$. Then $\lambda =2$, $X_1=H$, $X_2=-2E^{+}$, $X_3=0$. Choosing $n_0=3$ gives a vanishing next bracket but not $\lambda =3$. The intended endpoint is the first terminating bracket after the nonzero ladder.

For the plus-sign nested commutators, use $H=H_1$, $E^{\pm }=E_1^{\pm }$ and $X_0=E_2^{+}$. The cross relation gives $[E_1^{-},E_2^{+}]=0$, while $[H_1,E_2^{+}]=K_{21}{E}_2^{+}$. Thus the lowest-weight label is $\lambda =-K_{21}$. If the $n$-fold raised element is nonzero and the $(n+1)$-fold element vanishes, the preceding endpoint argument gives $\lambda =n$ and henceFor the minus-sign ladder, use the sl2 triple $H^{\prime }=-H_1$, $E^{\prime +}=E_1^{-}$, $E^{\prime -}=E_1^{+}$ and start at $X_0=E_2^{-}$. Its lowest-weight equation is again $[H^{\prime },X_0]=K_{21}{X}_0$, and its lowering bracket vanishes by the cross relation. The same argument proves exactly the same result, including the endpoint assumption that is explicit in the nested-commutator question.

For arbitrary roots of a root system $\alpha ,\beta$, choose the normalized sl2 subalgebra associated with a root $\beta$, whose generators obey $[H_{\beta },E_{\beta }^{\pm }]=\pm 2E_{\beta }^{\pm }$ and $[E_{\beta }^{+},E_{\beta }^{-}]=H_{\beta }$. The coroot normalization givesThe normalization has a concrete construction. Use the nondegenerate Killing form $B$, and define $t_{\beta }\in \mathfrak{h}$ by $B(t_{\beta },H)=\beta (H)$. Invariance makes root spaces orthogonal unless their roots sum to zero, so there exist $e\in {\mathcal{L}}_{\beta }$ and $f\in {\mathcal{L}}_{-\beta }$ with $B(e,f)=1$. Invariance then gives $B([e,f],H)=B(e,[f,H])=\beta (H)$, hence $[e,f]=t_{\beta }$. With $(\beta ,\beta )=\beta (t_{\beta })$, take $E_{\beta }^{+}=e$, $E_{\beta }^{-}=2f/(\beta ,\beta )$ and $H_{\beta }=2t_{\beta }/(\beta ,\beta )$. Their brackets have the required normalization and $\alpha (H_{\beta })=2(\alpha ,\beta )/(\beta ,\beta )$. Let $v$ be a nonzero $\alpha$ root vector with $H_{\beta }$ weight $w=\alpha (H_{\beta })$. Repeatedly apply $\mathrm{ad}{E}_{\beta }^{-}$ until reaching a last nonzero vector $v_0=(\mathrm{ad}{E}_{\beta }^{-}{)}^{p}v$. Its weight is $w-2p$. This process terminates because different weights are linearly independent and the Lie algebra is finite-dimensional. Starting at $v_0$, repeatedly raise; this also terminates for the same reason. The proven lowest-weight endpoint formula says $w-2p=-N$ for a nonnegative integer $N$. ThereforeThis proves integrality of Cartan integers directly from the finite ladder, rather than assuming the crystallographic axiom.

Finally use the indices actually printed in the PDF: $E_1^{+}=R^1{}_2$, $E_2^{+}=R^2{}_3$, $E_1^{-}=R^2{}_1$, $E_2^{-}=R^3{}_2$. The converted TeX has corrupted these indices. The prescribed bracket is that of trace-free matrix units. The sum of the diagonal generators is zero, leaving two independent diagonal elements, and their pair brackets giveFor example $[R^1{}_2,R^2{}_1]=R^1{}_1-R^2{}_2$, and the analogous second pair gives $H_2$. The cross raising-lowering brackets vanish. A diagonal $H$ with entries $h_r$ has $[H,R^r{}_s]=(h_r-h_s)R^r{}_s$. Thus $H_1$ acts on $E_1^{+},E_2^{+}$ with weights $2,-1$, and $H_2$ acts on them with weights $-1,2$. The negative generators have the opposite weights. In the question's index ordering,This is the Cartan matrix of the A2 root system, and the Lie algebra generated by these matrix units has rank two. As an additional bracket check, $[E_1^{+},E_2^{+}]=R^1{}_3\ne 0$ whereas $[E_1^{+},R^1{}_3]=0$, so the nested ladder has $n=1$ and indeed $K_{21}=-1$. The negative ladder likewise terminates after one nonzero bracket.

Use the course convention that a root system is finite and is a reduced root system satisfying the crystallographic root system condition. These hypotheses are essential for the angle restriction. For roots $r,s$, the two Cartan integerssatisfy $ab=4{\cos }^2\theta$. If $r,s$ are not parallel, the strict Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and integrality give $ab\in \{0,1,2,3\}$. These values give angles $\pi /2$, $\pi /3$ or $2\pi /3$, $\pi /4$ or $3\pi /4$, and $\pi /6$ or $5\pi /6$, respectively. If the roots are parallel, reducedness implies $s=\pm r$, giving $0$ or $\pi$. ThereforeHere are examples accounting for every angle. In the A1 root system, the pairs $(r,r)$ and $(r,-r)$ give $0,\pi$. Two roots from different summands of $A_1\oplus A_1$ give $\pi /2$. The six unit vectors at angles $k\pi /3$ form an A2 root system: taking one root at angle zero and another at $\pi /3$ or $2\pi /3$ gives those two angles. In the B2 root system $\{\pm e_1,\pm e_2,\pm e_1\pm e_2\}$, pair $e_1$ with $e_1+e_2$ or $-e_1+e_2$ to obtain $\pi /4,3\pi /4$. In a G2 root system, take short unit roots at angles $k\pi /3$ and long roots of length $\sqrt{3}$ at angles $\pi /6+k\pi /3$. A short root at zero paired with long roots at $\pi /6,5\pi /6$ gives the remaining angles.

The SU(3) Lie algebra is the compact real algebra of traceless skew-Hermitian matrices; its complexification is ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3(\mathbb{C})$, a special linear Lie algebra. In an antihermitian Lie algebra representation, the two commuting Cartan operators $H_1,H_2$ are Hermitian matrices, and the root operators satisfy $(E_{+}^a{)}^{†}=E_{-}^a$. Thus the spectral theorem gives an orthogonal weight-space decompositionA weight diagram plots the pairs $\mu$, recording the weight multiplicity $\dim V_{\mu }$ at each position. One point need not represent only one state. The commutators with $H_1,H_2$ give the roots of a root systemThe raising operators $E_{+}^a$ move a nonzero weight vector by $+{\alpha }_a$ and the lowering operators move it by $-{\alpha }_a$. These six root directions form the A2 root system. Each root and its negative generate an SU(2) representation ladder; in particular the pairs with Cartan operators $H_1$ and $-H_1/2+\sqrt{3}{H}_2/2$ constrain the two simple-root strings.

Choose a linear functional positive on the three positive roots. A maximal weight for this ordering is killed by every raising operator. In an Irreducible Lie algebra representation it generates the entire representation by lowering, and its weight space has dimension one. The two SU(2) representation strings show that its Dynkin labels are nonnegative integers:Conversely, each such pair specifies exactly one finite-dimensional irreducible highest-weight representation. Write it as $R(p,q)$. The fundamental weights in these Cartesian coordinates are ${\omega }_1=(1/2,1/(2\sqrt{3}))$ and ${\omega }_2=(0,1/\sqrt{3})$, soThe dimension follows from the three positive-root factors in the Weyl dimension formula: $p+1$, $q+1$, and $(p+q+2)/2$. The complex conjugate representation is $R(q,p)$, with every weight negated. The SU(3) highest-weight coordinates here use $(p,q)$ as Dynkin labels, not as the plotted Cartesian coordinates.

The weight diagram is invariant under the Weyl group, generated by reflections perpendicular to the two simple roots; its convex hull is the orbit polygon of the highest weight. For $p=q=0$ it is a point, the trivial representation. If exactly one of $p,q$ is zero, the polygon is an equilateral triangle, with opposite orientations for $R(p,0)$ and $R(0,p)$. Its edge has $p$ root steps. If $p,q>0$, it is a hexagon with alternating edge lengths $p,q$ root steps; it is regular precisely when $p=q$. The diagram contains the lattice points in that polygon belonging to the coset $\lambda +$ root lattice. A point in a different weight lattice coset is not a weight merely because it lies inside the polygon.

The shell multiplicities in an SU(3) weight diagram can be stated geometrically. The outer boundary has weight multiplicity one. Removing it leaves the orbit polygon for $R(p-1,q-1)$ on the same lattice coset, with every surviving multiplicity reduced by one. Repeating increases the actual weight multiplicity by one at each inward layer until the smaller label reaches zero. The remaining triangular region then has constant multiplicity $\min (p,q)+1$; when $p=q$ it is just the central point. A triangular weight diagram has multiplicity one everywhere. Thus $R(1,1)=8$, the adjoint representation of SU(3), has six root weights of multiplicity one and two independent zero-weight states; $R(2,1)=15$ has an outer shell of multiplicity one and an inner triangle of multiplicity two; $R(2,2)=27$ has twelve outer states, six positions of multiplicity two, and a central position of multiplicity three. The total is $12+6\cdot 2+3=27$. The dominant weight multiplicity formula for sl3 is an algebraic expression of the same rule.

For a tensor product of Lie algebra representations, the Cartan operators add. Consequently its tensor-product weight diagram has weights $\mu +\nu$ and multiplicitiesGeometrically, place a copy of the second weight diagram at every weight of the first, multiplying and adding coincident multiplicities. Because the representation is antihermitian, invariant subspaces have invariant orthogonal complements. To decompose the product, select a maximal remaining dominant weight, identify its irreducible highest-weight representation, subtract that representation's whole diagram with its weight multiplicities, and repeat. This highest-weight character subtraction must exhaust every weight, not merely the corners. Unlike the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2, an SU(3) product may contain repeated copies of an irreducible representation.

The two three-dimensional Fundamental representations of sl3 are $3=R(1,0)$ and $\overline{3}=R(0,1)$. In $3\otimes 3$, the largest weight is $2{\omega }_1$, giving the six-dimensional triangle $R(2,0)$; subtracting it leaves the reversed three-dimensional triangle $R(0,1)$. The first summand consists of symmetric tensors and the second of antisymmetric tensors. In $3\otimes \overline{3}$, the weight sums give the six roots once and weight zero three times. Subtracting the octet, whose zero weight has multiplicity two, leaves a singlet. Hence the octet and singlet in a fundamental SU3 tensor product and the two-quark product areThe first dimensions are $9=6+3$, and the second are $9=8+1$. Next $6\otimes 3$ has highest weight $3{\omega }_1$, giving $R(3,0)=10$. Subtraction leaves one $R(1,1)=8$. Together with $\overline{3}\otimes 3=8\oplus 1$, this proves the tensor cube of the defining SU(3) representation:The decuplet is fully symmetric in the three factors, the singlet fully antisymmetric, and the two octets have mixed permutation symmetry.

For the quark model, the relevant approximate flavour symmetry rotates the three light quarks $u,d,s$ in the fundamental $3$. The up quark, down quark, and strange quark basis states have the weight diagram of the defining SU(3) representation. In physical coordinates define isospin $I_3=H_1$ and flavor hypercharge $Y=2H_2/\sqrt{3}$. ThenThe last row follows from the Gell-Mann--Nishijima formula $Q=I_3+Y/2$, in units of the positive elementary electric charge. The antiquarks transform in $\overline{3}$ and have the negatives of these additive quantum numbers. Each quark has baryon number $B=1/3$; the strange quark has strangeness $S=-1$, while $u,d$ have $S=0$. Thus $Y=B+S$, distinguishing flavor hypercharge from electroweak hypercharge. The Weyl group geometry is equilateral in $(H_1,H_2)$; using $(I_3,Y)$ rescales the vertical coordinate.

A conventional meson has valence content $q\bar{q}$, so its flavour symmetry gives a meson octet and a singlet. For the light pseudoscalar mesons, the octet contains the pions ${\pi }^{+},{\pi }^0,{\pi }^{-}$ at $Y=0$ with isospin $I=1$, the kaons $K^{+}=u\bar{s},K^0=d\bar{s}$ at $Y=1$, their antiparticles at $Y=-1$, and the $I=0,Y=0$ Eta octet state. The central weight multiplicity two is realized byThe orthogonal eta singlet state is ${\eta }_1=(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}+s\bar{s})/\sqrt{3}$. The eta and eta prime mesons are mixtures of ${\eta }_8,{\eta }_1$, rather than exact octet and singlet mass eigenstates; this gives the pseudoscalar meson nonet. A different spin coupling of the same flavour product gives the vector mesons, again an octet and singlet, including the $\rho$, $K^{\ast }$, and neutral $\omega ,\varphi$ mixtures. The lowest orbital states have $J^P=0^{-}$ and $1^{-}$ respectively.

A conventional baryon has three valence quarks, so the tensor-cube decomposition supplies the flavour possibilities. The observed lowest baryon octet has spin $1/2$ and positive parity. Its isospin rows are $(Y,I)=(1,1/2),(0,1),(0,0),(-1,1/2)$: the nucleons $p,n$, the three Sigma baryons, the Lambda baryon, and the two Xi baryons. The central states ${\Sigma }^0$ and $\Lambda$ have the same weight $(I_3,Y)=(0,0)$ but different total isospin; this is the physical meaning of the octet's central multiplicity two. The spin-$3/2$, positive-parity baryon decuplet is the triangle with rowsThe Delta baryons form its top row, and the Omega baryon is the bottom $sss$ state. All ten weights have multiplicity one. Their electric charges follow directly from the Gell-Mann--Nishijima formula; for example ${\Delta }^{++}$ has $I_3=3/2,Y=1$, so $Q=2$, and ${\Omega }^{-}$ has $I_3=0,Y=-2$, so $Q=-1$.

The two algebraic octets do not mean that two independent ground-state octets must occur. A three-quark colour singlet has a completely antisymmetric colour wavefunction. For a symmetric spatial ground state, the Pauli exclusion principle therefore requires a symmetric combined spin-flavour wavefunction. The symmetric flavour decuplet pairs with symmetric spin $3/2$; mixed flavour octets pair with mixed spin $1/2$ in one symmetric combination. Equivalently, the symmetric spin-flavour SU6 representation hasThe three-quark flavour singlet is the antisymmetric $uds$ combination. For a spatially symmetric ground state it would require an antisymmetric spin state of three spin-$1/2$ particles, but ${\bigwedge }^3{\mathbb{C}}^2=0$. The Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets thus excludes it from this ground-state sector; orbital excitation permits other multiplets.

Finally, this flavour symmetry is approximate: the unequal light-quark masses, especially the larger strange-quark mass, and electromagnetic interactions split masses within the multiplets and permit octet-singlet mixing. The weight diagrams classify flavour states, rather than asserting exact equality of their masses. Colour SU(3) is a separate gauge action on each flavour and supplies the colour-singlet constraint; it is not the approximate flavour action used in the eightfold way. The light conventional mesons organize into flavour octets and singlets, while the spatial ground-state three-quark baryons form one spin-$1/2$ octet and one spin-$3/2$ decuplet.

Use Dynkin labels $(a,b)$ for the highest weight $a{\omega }_1+b{\omega }_2$ of the complex special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$. The A2 root system has ${\alpha }_1=(2,-1)$ and ${\alpha }_2=(-1,2)$ in these coordinates. In the drawings, ${\omega }_1$ and ${\omega }_2$ have equal lengths and angle $60^{\circ }$; a label at a point records its weight multiplicity, not a further copy at a different position.

The defining fundamental representation has the three weightsFor ${\Gamma }_{2,1}$, lower from its highest weight by the simple roots, retaining multiplicities. One convenient way to calculate them is the sl3 interlacing character formula: for shape $(3,1,0)$ the integer patterns satisfy $1\le p\le 3$, $0\le q\le 1$, $q\le r\le p$, and contribute the weightEnumerating these patterns gives the weight diagramIts dimension is $3\cdot 2+9=15$. The diagram below draws all twelve distinct positions, with the three inner multiplicities equal to two. The extra panel gives the symmetric square used in the calculation.