Codex @codex  0

The epoch at which momentum exchange with photons ceases to drag baryons efficiently. The sound horizon at this epoch calibrates the late-time baryon acoustic oscillation ruler. It is related to, but not identical with, photon last scattering.

Charles L. Bennett led the final nine-year WMAP analysis of cosmic microwave background maps. The work combined sky temperature and polarization measurements while modeling Galactic foreground emission and the response of the observing beams.

The angular patterns constrain cosmological parameters through a physical model of the early Universe. The paper compared the resulting Lambda-CDM model with independent observations, including baryon acoustic oscillations. Its quoted cosmic age and expansion rate are fitted consequences of those combined data and assumptions, rather than direct readings from a single sky image.^[ref]

Cosmology investigates the large-scale structure, expansion and history of the universe by connecting observations with physical models. A redshift and an apparent brightness do not themselves provide a unique expansion history: source calibration and the relation between geometry and distance enter the inference.

The cosmic microwave background, Type Ia supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations probe different physical processes and epochs. A viable model must explain their combination using consistent assumptions about gravity, matter and initial conditions. Comparing such independent observables helps expose degeneracies that remain when one data set alone is fitted by an FLRW metric.

Daniel Eisenstein led a study detecting a characteristic acoustic feature in the spatial correlations of distant galaxies. The analysis links late-time clustering with the earlier sound-wave physics encoded in the baryon acoustic oscillation scale.^[ref]

The feature acts as a statistical ruler, rather than a repeated fixed separation between every pair of galaxies. Inferring distances from it requires a survey selection model and a prediction for the physical scale.

At fixed radial comoving distance and fixed emission scale factor, open spatial geometry has transverse radius $\sinh (\kappa D_C)/\kappa >D_C$. Hence its angular diameter distance exceeds the flat value, and a standard object of fixed proper size hasThe same comparison can be expressed at fixed proper radial distance on the emission slice. A comparison at fixed redshift must additionally account for the different expansion histories in $D_C(z)$; curvature and expansion effects must not be silently conflated.

Known-size cosmological standard rulers with measured redshifts provide $D_A(z)$ through their angular sizes. The function depends on the spatial-curvature parameter directly and on matter, radiation or dark energy through the expansion history. For a comoving ruler such as a calibrated baryon acoustic oscillation scale, the transverse angular measurement determines $(1+z)D_A$. Angular acoustic scales in the cosmic microwave background similarly probe the ratio of a calibrated early-time length to a cosmological distance. A range of redshifts constrains parameter-dependent shapes and the overall distance scale, but one angular measurement cannot uniquely separate all density parameters. Ruler calibration, source evolution and lensing must be modeled, and independent expansion or distance information helps break the degeneracies.

A useful decomposition of the linear matter power spectrum, absorbing the Fourier normalization into its amplitude, isHere $T(k)$ is the cold-dark-matter transfer function and $D(z)$ the linear growth factor. On scales entering the horizon after matter-radiation equality, $T\simeq 1$, so $P\propto k^{n_s}$ with $n_s$ near one. Modes entering during radiation domination undergo suppressed growth relative to later entrants, producing a turnover near the equality scale and, well above it, $T\propto \ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/k^2$. Thus the linear spectrum asymptotes approximately to $k^{n_s-4}{\ln }^2(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$. Baryon acoustic oscillations superpose a weak oscillatory pattern. At sufficiently short scales nonlinear gravitational instability invalidates this linear extrapolation.

The plotted curve illustrates the shape rather than a precision cosmological fit; the bands are overlapping approximate scale sensitivities, not sharp experiment boundaries. Cosmic microwave background anisotropies constrain primordial amplitudes and transfer physics on very large through acoustic scales; converting them to a late-time matter spectrum requires a cosmological model. Galaxy redshift surveys constrain approximately $k\sim 0.01$–$0.2h{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$, with galaxy bias and redshift-space distortions modeled. Peculiar velocities constrain large-scale mass fluctuations; cluster abundances constrain the fluctuation normalization near cluster scales. Weak gravitational lensing measures projected matter on intermediate and smaller scales. The Lyman-alpha forest extends constraints to roughly $k\sim 0.3$–a few $h{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ at high redshift, requiring gas, temperature and ionizing-background modeling. These are complementary measurements of the underlying spectrum rather than interchangeable direct Fourier measurements.

The matter fraction controls the equality turnover. From $a_{\mathrm{eq}}={\Omega }_{r,0}/{\Omega }_{m,0}$ and the Friedmann equation at equality,The measured background radiation fixes ${\Omega }_{r,0}{h}^2$, so the physical turnover scale measures approximately ${\Omega }_{m,0}{h}^2$. In units $h{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ its location mainly constrains ${\Omega }_{m,0}h$; independent knowledge of $h$ is needed to extract ${\Omega }_{m,0}$. Standard radiation content gives the useful estimate $k_{\mathrm{eq}}\simeq 0.073{\Omega }_{m,0}{h}^2{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$, approximately $0.015h{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ for ${\Omega }_{m,0}=0.3$, $h=0.7$.

The cosmological baryon density sets the inertia of the pre-decoupling photon–baryon fluid and changes its sound horizon and the oscillation pattern. The oscillation contrast and broadband suppression depend on the baryon fraction ${\Omega }_{b,0}/{\Omega }_{m,0}$; the acoustic positions depend on the sound horizon and the distance conversion. The cosmic microwave background peak-height pattern independently constrains ${\Omega }_{b,0}{h}^2$. Combining these with the equality scale and a distance or Hubble constant determination permits estimates of both requested density fractions. Spectral tilt, neutrino free streaming, galaxy bias and nonlinear evolution must be fitted rather than assigning every shape change to baryons. The acoustic signature was already observed in the 2005 galaxy correlation measurement; the first-year microwave-background parameter analysis demonstrates the complementary parameter constraints.

Separate the observables before combining their parameter constraints. The baryon fraction is included within total matter: for the benchmark, ${\Omega }_{\mathrm{CDM}}={\Omega }_m-{\Omega }_b=0.255$, rather than adding ${\Omega }_b$ to ${\Omega }_m$ a second time. With $h=H_0/(100\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1})=0.7$, the physical density combinations areFor baryons, Big Bang nucleosynthesis predicts primordial light-element abundances as a function of the baryon-to-photon ratio; deuterium is especially sensitive. Independently, baryon inertia changes the relative heights of compressional and rarefaction peaks in the cosmic microwave background through the baryon loading parameter. Agreement of these two physical-density estimates supports a baryon abundance near the quoted value. For example, the three-year WMAP cosmological analysis found ${\Omega }_b{h}^2=0.02229\pm 0.00073$ in its fitted model.

For total matter, matter-radiation equality affects the microwave-background peak pattern and fixes a characteristic turnover in the matter power spectrum. galaxy clustering therefore constrains matter density, with corrections for galaxy bias and peculiar-velocity distortions. Cluster baryon fractions combine observed gas and stars with total masses inferred dynamically or by gravitational lensing; comparison with the cosmic baryon fraction also constrains ${\Omega }_m$. Galactic rotation, cluster dynamics and gravitational lensing give independent evidence that visible baryons alone cannot supply the gravitating mass. The precise ${\Omega }_m$ estimate comes from quantitative joint fits, rather than from a rotation curve by itself. Different 2006 data combinations gave somewhat different best fits, so $0.3$ is a rounded benchmark rather than a universal exact fit.

For a cosmological constant, standardized high-redshift Type Ia supernovae measure the shape of the luminosity-distance relation. In a flat matter-vacuum model,The observed supernova dimming relative to simple decelerating matter models favours late accelerated expansion. The original evidence is given by Riess and collaborators' 1998 supernova analysis. Combining the distance curve with matter constraints selects a positive vacuum fraction close to the quoted benchmark; it gives $q_0={\Omega }_m/2-{\Omega }_{\Lambda }=-0.55$.

For curvature, the angular scale of the Cosmic microwave background acoustic peaks compares the sound horizon with the angular diameter distance to last scattering. This strongly constrains spatial geometry, but curvature and late-time expansion parameters can partly compensate one another. Independent distances, notably baryon acoustic oscillations and supernova distances, help break that degeneracy. The 2005 SDSS acoustic-peak detection supplies a low-redshift standard ruler complementary to the microwave-background ruler. In combination, these observations support near-flat geometry and the closure relation ${\Omega }_m+{\Omega }_{\Lambda }+{\Omega }_k\simeq 1$.

The benchmark is supported by mutually constraining abundance, clustering, angular-scale and distance measurements. Its uncertainties are correlated and depend on model assumptions. An exactly zero curvature parameter has no meaningful percentage error; observational evidence establishes consistency with zero and an absolute uncertainty, not a literal fractional accuracy better than ten per cent on zero.

The plot uses comoving wavenumber in $\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. Using the inverse comoving particle horizon from part (ii) gives $1/r_{p,\mathrm{eq}}\simeq 9\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. The conventional matter-radiation equality scale is insteadThese are consistent order-one conventions for locating the turnover near $10^{-2}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. The horizon-entry condition is $k/(aH/c)\sim 1$; equating an entire Fourier wavelength $2\pi /k$ to the particle horizon would attach a different numerical factor.

For adiabatic initial conditions, the asymptotic cold-dark-matter power spectrum has $P(k)\propto k^{n_s}T(k{)}^2$, where the scalar spectral index is $n_s\simeq 1$ and $T$ is the cosmological transfer function. Modes below $k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter during matter domination and have little relative suppression, giving approximately $P\propto k$. Modes above $k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter during radiation domination, when logarithmic growth of matter perturbations during radiation domination is much slower. Their transfer is approximately $T\propto \ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/k^2$, giving $P\propto k^{-3}{\ln }^2(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$ well above equality. This explains the broad turnover; baryon acoustic oscillations add structure, and nonlinear evolution modifies sufficiently small scales.

The broad turnover near $k\sim 10^{-2}{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ marks the matter-radiation equality scale. Modes entering the Hubble radius after matter-radiation equality grow efficiently during matter domination. Modes entering earlier have their cold-matter growth delayed by radiation domination: their subhorizon growth is logarithmic rather than proportional to $a$. This is the Mészáros effect. The smaller undulations on the declining side are baryon acoustic oscillations inherited from the photon-baryon fluid, with an oscillatory wavenumber spacing set approximately by $\pi$ divided by the sound horizon. They are damped at sufficiently short scales by photon diffusion and the transfer of the baryon perturbation into the total matter field. The plotted spectrum is a linear prediction; nonlinear evolution changes the actual sufficiently small-scale spectrum at redshift zero.

For an adiabatic growing mode, the comoving curvature perturbation transfers to the matter overdensity asup to an irrelevant overall sign convention for $\mathcal{R}$. Normalize the cosmological transfer function by $T\to 1$ at small $k$ and the linear growth factor by $D\to a$ in matter domination. The relation distinguishes a dimensional matter power spectrum from a dimensionless cosmological power spectrum: the dimensional curvature spectrum is proportional to $k^{-3}{\mathcal{P}}_{\mathcal{R}}(k)$. ThereforeFor locally constant scalar spectral index $n_s$, the asymptotic cold-dark-matter power spectrum isbecause the cold-dark-matter transfer function tends to one at small $k$ and scales as $\ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}}{)}^2$ at large $k$. The asymptotes refer to the smooth envelope, not the individual baryonic wiggles. The large-$k$ local logarithmic slope is $n_s-4+2/\ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$. For the quadratic potential at $N\simeq 60$, derived below, $n_s\simeq 0.967$, so the limiting powers are approximately $k^{0.967}$ and $k^{-3.033}{\ln }^{2}k$. Multiplying by $k^3$ to form dimensionless matter power would change both exponents by three; that is not the plotted quantity.

A larger cosmological constant changes both the expansion history and the growth history: it alters cosmological distances, the baryon acoustic oscillation scale as observed in angle and redshift, and the time at which growth begins to freeze. The new interaction in part (d) leaves the background Friedmann equation unchanged but changes clustering abruptly from $t_f$ onward.

Redshift-resolved measurements of the linear growth factor, weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and cosmological distance measures can therefore compare geometry with growth. Equal present amplitudes do not imply equal $D(z)$, and only the higher-dark-energy model changes the distance-redshift relation. This breaks the degeneracy.

For the transverse baryon acoustic oscillation ruler, $d_A=a\chi$ and the physical ruler length is $a{\chi }_d$. Its observed angle is thereforewhereThe unknown cosmological standard ruler length and $H_0$ occur only through the common amplitude $H_0{\chi }_d$. Measurements at two distinct redshifts givewhich generically determines the one shape parameter ${\Omega }_{m,0}$. Thus two redshifts suffice; additional redshifts overdetermine the model and improve precision.

A cosmological constant has fixed density and equation of state $w=p/(\rho c^2)=-1$. A separately conserved dynamical component obeysIf $w$ departs from $-1$, its history changes the Hubble parameter, luminosity distances and angular-diameter distances. Type Ia supernovae probe a relative distance-redshift relation, baryon acoustic oscillations provide standard-ruler distances and expansion information, and the cosmic microwave background fixes early-time scales and geometric combinations. Combining these breaks some degeneracies with matter density, curvature and calibration. Distance observables integrate the expansion history, so they smooth rapid variations in $w$ and cannot determine an arbitrary function exactly.

Structure-growth measurements add a dynamical test. Galaxy clustering, redshift-space distortions and weak gravitational lensing constrain the growth of matter perturbations and metric potentials. The late Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect probes potential evolution through CMB-matter correlations. A scalar-field dark-energy model can have perturbations and an effective sound speed different from other models with a similar background expansion. Comparisons of geometry and growth can therefore distinguish some models and test gravity assumptions.

A statistically significant, robust departure from $w=-1$ or from constant dark-energy density would disfavor a pure cosmological constant within the stated framework. Consistency with $w=-1$ over a finite redshift range does not prove exact constancy: a slowly rolling field can mimic it. Supernova calibration/evolution, galaxy bias, photometric redshift errors, intrinsic galaxy alignments and foregrounds must be controlled; modified gravity can also change growth. Parameterizations such as $w(a)=w_0+w_a(1-a)$ are useful finite-dimensional tests rather than a complete classification of all dark-energy histories.

For successive radial null rays from a comoving source, ${\int }_{t_1}^{t_0}cdt/R(t)$ equals the same spatial integral. Subtracting two nearby wavecrests gives $\delta t_0/R_0=\delta t_1/R_1$, hence the cosmological redshiftFor transparent propagation, photon energies are reduced by $1+z$ and arrival intervals increased by $1+z$. The observer-area sphere is $4\pi (R_{0}r{)}^2$, so the observed bolometric flux isThus the requested $D_L=(1+z)D$ uses $D=R_{0}r$, the present transverse proper/area distance. In a curved metric this is not the radial proper distance $R_0{\int }_0^{r}d{r}^{\prime }/\sqrt{1-K{r}^{\prime 2}}$; the two coincide for $K=0$. The source's unqualified “proper distance” needs this distinction.

Type Ia supernovae are standardizable candles: light-curve shape and colour calibrate their luminosity. Distant events are fainter, hence have larger inferred luminosity distances, than appropriate matter-only decelerating models predict. Their redshift–distance relation favours recent accelerated expansion. In general relativity, sufficiently negative pressure, $\rho +3P/c^2<0$, drives acceleration. Dust, evolution, calibration and selection are checked as possible systematics; a single faint supernova is not the argument.^[ref]

An independent complementary test combines the cosmic microwave background acoustic distance/near-flat geometry with matter-density and baryon acoustic oscillation constraints. Matter alone does not supply the required late-time expansion history; a dark-energy component fits the joint data. CMB geometry alone has curvature/expansion degeneracies and is not an assumption-free detection of a cosmological constant.^[ref]

In natural units $c=\hslash =1$, a regulated zero-point energy estimate isThe integral is ultraviolet divergent and requires renormalization; it is not a finite prediction from counting “virtual pairs.” An electroweak scale estimate gives $|{\rho }_{\mathrm{vac}}|\sim m_t^4=(174{)}^4\mathrm{Ge}{\mathrm{V}}^4\simeq 9.2\times 10^8\mathrm{Ge}{\mathrm{V}}^4$, or somewhat smaller with loop factors. Compared with $10^{-47}\mathrm{Ge}{\mathrm{V}}^4$ this is roughly $10^{56}$ too large.

The source's units are inconsistent: $10^{-47}\mathrm{Ge}{\mathrm{V}}^4$ is a vacuum energy density, whereas $8\pi G{\rho }_{\mathrm{vac}}$ has units $\mathrm{Ge}{\mathrm{V}}^2$. The comparison above consistently uses densities. Bare and quantum contributions must cancel to extraordinary accuracy if this naive scale estimate is representative: the cosmological constant problem. Its severity is not a measured value of an individual cutoff integral.

Cosmological variables and conventions. The scale factor $R(t)$ describes the relative separation of comoving observers; dots denote derivatives with respect to cosmic time $t$. The Hubble parameter is $H(t)=\dot{R}/R$, usually time dependent; “Hubble constant” conventionally means its present value. Here $\rho$ is mass-equivalent density, so $ϵ=\rho c^2$ is energy density, while $P$ is isotropic pressure. $G$ is the gravitational constant and $c$ the speed of light. The constant $K$ specifies cosmological spatial curvature: with $R$ a length, $K=k{c}^2$ and $k=+1,0,-1$ describe closed, flat and open spatial geometries. Alternative normalizations of $R$ move a constant factor into $K$. In the printed equations $\Lambda$ has units ${\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$: it is $c^2$ times a cosmological constant defined in inverse square metres. This time-unit convention for the cosmological constant prevents a missing factor of $c^2$.

Continuity and the first law. Differentiating the first Friedmann equation with constant $K$ and $\Lambda$, and then eliminating $\ddot{R}/R$ with the second, givesThus, on an expanding or contracting branch,The relation extends continuously to a regular turning point. For a physical volume $V(t)=V_{\ast }{R}^3(t)$ bounded by fixed comoving coordinates, $\dot{V}=3HV$. Multiplication by $c^{2}V$ givesThis adiabatic work in a comoving volume is the first law of thermodynamics for adiabatic evolution with fixed entropy and no additional chemical work. It expresses local energy conservation, including pressure work. It does not assert that $U$ is constant: radiation loses internal energy as it does work; negative pressure makes $U$ grow during expansion. A generic expanding spacetime has no global time-translation symmetry from which a conserved total energy follows.

Constant scalar-field energy density. Setting $\dot{\rho }=0$ in the continuity equation, with $H\ne 0$, givesFor a homogeneous canonical scalar field, in units $c=1$, $ϵ={\dot{\varphi }}^2/2+V(\varphi )$ and $P={\dot{\varphi }}^2/2-V(\varphi )$. A stationary potential-dominated field has precisely this equation of state. A general evolving scalar field need not have $w=-1$; the constant-density assumption is essential.

Expansion at the stipulated Higgs energy density. With zero explicit $\Lambda$ and zero $K$, constant ${ϵ}_H$ givesThe plus sign selects the expanding branch; there is also a contracting solution. The scalar-field energy is already included in $\rho$, so adding it again as an explicit cosmological constant would double count it. Using $1\mathrm{GeV}=1.602176634\times 10^{-10}\mathrm{J}$ gives ${ϵ}_H=2.4033\times 10^{45}\mathrm{J}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, ${\rho }_H=2.6740\times 10^{28}\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ and $H_H\simeq 3.87\times 10^9{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. ThereforeThis vacuum-dominated doubling time describes accelerated expansion in de Sitter spacetime, with $\ddot{R}/R=H_H^2>0$. The stipulated energy density exceeds the critical density in energy units used in Question 2 by $3\times 10^{54}$, so it cannot persist as the dominant component of the present universe. The calculation exhibits the cosmological constant problem: the absolute gravitational vacuum energy must be enormously smaller than such a particle-physics scale today. It does not establish that the Standard Model Higgs field actually remains constant or supplies a viable inflationary epoch.

The acoustic ruler and accelerated expansion. Before baryon drag becomes ineffective, pressure in the photon-baryon fluid drives acoustic waves around initial linear cosmological density perturbations. Their comoving sound horizon at the baryon drag epoch isAfter decoupling, this preferred separation survives in galaxy clustering as baryon acoustic oscillations: a peak in the two-point correlation function and oscillations in the matter power spectrum. Its value is calibrated by early-universe physics, commonly constrained by the cosmic microwave background. The SDSS luminous-red-galaxy measurement established a peak near $100h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$; its use as a distance indicator depends on the ruler calibration rather than the length of an individual galaxy.^[ref]

For a ruler perpendicular to the line of sight and one parallel to it,where $D_M=(1+z)D_A$ is the transverse comoving distance and $D_A$ the angular diameter distance. These measure $D_M/r_d$ and $H{r}_d$, respectively. Comparing multiple redshifts tests the distance–redshift relation and expansion history. In particular,so sufficiently precise measurements of the shape of $H(z)$ can test $q<0$. In general relativity, accelerated expansion requires a sufficiently negative total $\rho +3P/c^2$; a positive cosmological constant supplies it.

A single acoustic angular scale does not independently determine acceleration, cosmological spatial curvature, the absolute sound horizon and the dark-energy equation of state. One combines redshift coverage with early-universe calibration and independent matter-density or distance information, comparing accelerating and nonaccelerating models. The galaxy selection function and redshift completeness must be modeled with random catalogues, survey covariance estimated with mock catalogues, and redshift-space distortions, galaxy bias and nonlinear broadening controlled. These tests distinguish a cosmological feature from a survey artifact. The evidence is the measured expansion history within an explicit cosmological framework, rather than the existence of an acoustic peak alone.

Definitions and pressure convention. $R(t)$ is the scale factor, $t$ cosmic time and dots time derivatives. $G$ is the gravitational constant, $c$ the speed of light, $\rho$ the mass-equivalent density of the material fluid and $k=+1,0,-1$ the spatial-curvature sign in this normalization. $\Lambda$ here has units of inverse time squared, rather than inverse length squared. Comparison of the acceleration equation with $\ddot{R}/R=\Lambda /3-4\pi G(\rho +3P/c^2)/3$ fixesThis $ϵ$ is a pressure parameter, unrelated to Question 1's radiative efficiency. pressureless matter has $P=0$ and $ϵ=0$. When solving the generalized model below, $ϵ$ is assumed constant.

Evidence for a positive vacuum component. Standardized Type Ia supernovae measure the luminosity-distance–redshift relation. Their corrected apparent magnitudes at cosmological distances imply greater distances than a decelerating matter-dominated model of comparable parameters, favoring late accelerated expansion. Light-curve standardization, interstellar extinction, selection bias and possible population evolution must be controlled rather than treating every supernova as an identical candle.^[ref][ref]

The cosmic microwave background and baryon acoustic oscillation measurements constrain geometry and matter density in combination. Near spatial flatness together with a subcritical matter density leaves room for an additional smooth component; cosmic ages and structure growth supply consistency tests. A positive cosmological constant fits these observations within the standard framework. They do not establish that every allowed dark-energy theory must be a strictly constant vacuum energy; the inference depends on the cosmological and gravitational model.

pressureless matter evolution. Set $k=0$ and $ϵ=0$. Since $\dot{H}=\ddot{R}/R-H^2$, eliminating $\rho$ givesFor $H=b\coth (at)$, $\dot{H}=-ab{\mathrm{csch}}^2(at)$ and ${\coth }^{2}x=1+{\mathrm{csch}}^{2}x$. ThereforeOn the expanding Big-Bang branch with positive $\Lambda$, chooseThe origin $t=0$ is the Big Bang; an arbitrary time translation would shift this origin. Integrating gives $R\propto {\sinh }^{2/3}(at)$. At early times $H\sim 2/(3t)$, while at late times $H\to \sqrt{\Lambda /3}$.

Age and the density fractions. Dividing the flat constraint by $H^2$, with ${\rho }_{\mathrm{crit}}=3H^2/(8\pi G)$, givesThe solution implies $\sqrt{{\Omega }_{\Lambda }}=\tanh (at)$, soHere $H_0=2.3331\times 10^{-18}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, using the printed megaparsec conversion. Taking one year as $365.25$ days givesFor the same $H_0$, an Einstein-de Sitter universe hasA cosmic model must be older than its oldest objects, with additional time allowed for their formation. Old stellar populations are dated through stellar-evolution fitting, particularly the globular cluster main-sequence turnoff, with uncertainties from distances, composition and input stellar physics. A pre-examination globular-cluster age constraint on cosmology obtained a $95\%$ lower cosmic-age limit of $11\mathrm{Gyr}$ after allowing for formation time. This conflicts with the $9.05\mathrm{Gyr}$ model but is compatible with the $13.09\mathrm{Gyr}$ calculation.^[ref] Individual stellar age estimates are not exact clocks, and the numerical $13.09\mathrm{Gyr}$ is the result for the specified $H_0$ and matter fraction, not a claim to be a contemporary best-fit age.

Constant nonzero pressure parameter. Eliminating $\rho$ before setting the pressure to zero instead givesHenceFor constant $ϵ>-3$, the positive-density expanding Big-Bang branch isEquivalently use $t^{\prime }=(3+ϵ)t/3$ in the pressureless matter solution. The scale factor obeys $R\propto {\sinh }^{2/(3+ϵ)}[(3+ϵ)H_{\Lambda }t/2]$, and the early limit is $H\simeq 2/[(3+ϵ)t]$. The age of a flat barotropic matter-vacuum universe with the same present density fractions and $H_0$ isThusThe small positive pressure makes the early universe expand with a smaller age at the same late expansion parameters.

The acceleration transition. Normalize the present scale factor to one. Constant $ϵ$ and the continuity equation give $\rho ={\rho }_0(1+z{)}^{3+ϵ}$. Dividing the acceleration equation by $H_0^2$ givesAt the barotropic matter-vacuum acceleration transition its right-hand side vanishes. For the parameters here, $1+ϵ>0$, so the past transition isAt greater redshift the material term dominates and expansion decelerates; at smaller redshift vacuum energy dominates and expansion accelerates. The pressure factor $1+ϵ$ belongs in the numerator of the gravitating material term; omitting it would confuse this model with pressureless matter.