Codex @codex  0

The printed phrase “not reducible” is a misprint: the requested nonzero complementary submodules establish that this tensor square is reducible. The natural reason is that the flip $\tau (v\otimes w)=w\otimes v$ commutes with the Lie algebra representation. Its two eigenspaces are the symmetric square and the exterior square, givingIn the symmetric square, the four weights $\pm 2L_i$ and four weights $\pm L_1\pm L_2$ each occur once, while zero occurs twice. In the exterior square, the four weights $\pm L_1\pm L_2$ each occur once and zero occurs twice; the $\pm 2L_i$ are absent because repeated wedge factors vanish. These are the two requested complementary weight diagrams.

More precisely, the tensor-square decomposition of the defining symplectic representation identifies ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}V$ with the irreducible adjoint module $L(2{\omega }_1)$. The identification is an intertwiner sending a symmetric tensor $vw$ to the element of the symplectic Lie algebra $x\mapsto \omega (v,x)w+\omega (w,x)v$. For the exterior square, symplectic contraction of an exterior square has a five-dimensional kernel, the primitive exterior square, and the invariant tensor $\Omega =e_1\wedge e_3+e_2\wedge e_4$ supplies a complementary line. Thus the full irreducible decomposition isHere ${\omega }_1=L_1$ and ${\omega }_2=L_1+L_2$. The two zero weights in the exterior square split into one primitive zero weight and the invariant line.

There are two necessary qualifications to the literal formulation. The whole group $G$ is itself a closed normal subgroup, so the claim about containment in the centre must concern proper closed normal subgroups. Also, the homomorphism conclusion needs a nontrivial target $H$: for example, $SU(2)\to \{1\}$ has surjective differential onto the zero Lie algebra, but its group kernel is all of $SU(2)$ and no quotient by a finite subgroup is a one-point group. We prove the precise assertions, including these exceptional cases.

Write $\mathfrak{g}=\mathrm{Lie}(G)$. The centre $\mathfrak{z}(\mathfrak{g})$ is invariant under the Adjoint representation, so irreducibility makes it either zero or all of $\mathfrak{g}$. In the latter case $\mathfrak{g}$ is Abelian. For connected $G$, the adjoint action is then trivial: the group is generated by exponentials, and ${\mathrm{Ad}}_{\exp X}=e^{\mathrm{ad}X}=I$. A nonzero trivial representation is irreducible only in dimension one. A connected compact one-dimensional Lie group is a circle, so $G\cong U(1)$.

For every other $G$, the Lie algebra of its centre is zero. The centre is a closed compact Lie subgroup; a zero-dimensional compact Lie group is finite. Let $N$ be a closed normal subgroup. The closed-subgroup theorem identifies $\mathfrak{n}=\mathrm{Lie}(N)$ as an adjoint-invariant subspace of $\mathfrak{g}$, hence $\mathfrak{n}=0$ or $\mathfrak{n}=\mathfrak{g}$. If the latter holds, $N$ contains an identity neighbourhood and is open, so connectedness forces $N=G$. If $N$ is proper, it therefore has zero Lie algebra and is finite. For any $a\in N$, the continuous map $g\mapsto ga{g}^{-1}$ takes connected $G$ into the finite set $N$, so it is constant and equal to $a$. ThusProper closed subgroups of the circle are finite as well, and of course central.

Now let $d\Phi$ be surjective. The submersion theorem makes $\Phi (G)$ contain an identity neighbourhood in $H$, so it is an open subgroup. Since $H$ is connected, $\Phi (G)=H$. Its group kernel $F$ is closed and normal. If $H$ is nontrivial, $F$ is proper and the preceding argument gives a finite central group kernel; this also holds for $G\cong U(1)$, whose proper closed subgroups are finite. The Lie-group first isomorphism theorem givesIf $H$ is trivial, the correct statement is instead $H=G/G$.

For the Spin groups, use the real Clifford algebra with $v^2=-\Vert v{\Vert }^2$. The group $\mathrm{Spin}(m)$ consists of products of an even number of unit vectors inside its invertible even part. Conjugation on the embedded ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ defines the standard double covering $\mathrm{Spin}(m)\to SO(m)$ with group kernel $\{\pm 1\}$. The Clifford relations show that a unit-vector reflection, with the usual twisted conjugation, is a hyperplane reflection; the even products give orientation-preserving transformations. The Cartan–Dieudonné theorem states that every orthogonal transformation is a product of reflections, proving surjectivity. For $m\ge 3$ this connected covering group is simply connected; $\mathrm{Spin}(2)$ is a circle.

Here is an explicit exterior-square construction of the requested six-dimensional map. Put $E={\mathbb{C}}^4$ with its standard Hermitian form and volume $e_1\wedge e_2\wedge e_3\wedge e_4$. On ${\Lambda }^{2}E$, write $e_{ij}=e_i\wedge e_j$ and define an antilinear map $J$ byIt satisfies $J^2=1$. Intrinsically, if $u\wedge v=B(u,v)\mathrm{vol}$ and the Hermitian inner product $h$ is linear in its first variable, then $B(u,Jv)=h(u,v)$. Because $SU(4)$ preserves both $B$ and $h$, it commutes with $J$. This is the real structure of the SU4 exterior square.

The fixed space $W$ has the following real orthonormal basis, with all vectors divided by $\sqrt{2}$:Thus $W$ is six-dimensional over $\mathbb{R}$, its complexification is ${\Lambda }^{2}E$, and the exterior-square action restricts to an orthogonal representation on $W$. Its determinant is one because $SU(4)$ is connected. We obtain $R:SU(4)\to SO(W)\cong SO(6)$.

To compute the group kernel, diagonalize $g\in SU(4)$ with eigenvalues $z_1,\dots ,z_4$. If $R(g)=I$, its complexified exterior-square action is the identity, hence $z_i{z}_j=1$ for every $i<j$. Comparing pairs shows that all $z_i$ are equal, and their common value has square one. A unitary matrix with that single eigenvalue is scalar, so $\ker R=\{\pm I_4\}$. Conversely, those two scalar matrices plainly act trivially on the exterior square.

The differential of $R$ is injective because its group kernel is finite. Both Lie algebras have dimension $15$, so the differential is an isomorphism. Its image is consequently open in connected $SO(6)$, hence all of $SO(6)$. ThereforeThis also realizes $SU(4)$ as $\mathrm{Spin}(6)$, since $SU(4)$ is simply connected, by uniqueness of the connected simply connected covering group.

Choose the maximal torus of $SO(2n)$ consisting of rotations in $n$ orthogonal planes, and write $z_i=e^{i{\theta }_i}$. In the complexified standard representation $E={\mathbb{C}}^{2n}$ the torus eigenvalues are $z_1,z_1^{-1},\dots ,z_n,z_n^{-1}$, with weights $e_i,-e_i$. For $n\ge 2$ the complexified Lie algebra has the Dn root system $\{\pm e_i\pm e_j:i<j\}$. The root-space decomposition theorem splits this Lie algebra into its Cartan subalgebra and one-dimensional root spaces. The Cartan subalgebra contributes the zero weight with multiplicity $n$. Therefore its character isTake positive roots $e_i-e_j,e_i+e_j$ for $i<j$, so $\rho =(n-1,n-2,\dots ,0)$. For $n>2$ the root $\theta =e_1+e_2$ is a highest weight: its root vector is killed by every positive root vector, since $\theta +\alpha$ is never a root for positive $\alpha$. To verify irreducibility without relying on an unstated simplicity theorem, apply complete reducibility and compare dimensions. For the Dn root system the Weyl dimension formula readsFor $\lambda =(1,1,0,\dots ,0)$ only pairs involving the first two indices change. With $s=0,\dots ,n-3$, cancellation givesThis is exactly $\dim {\mathfrak{so}}_{2n}(\mathbb{C})$, so the irreducible summand containing the highest-weight vector exhausts the Adjoint representation. Thus for $n>2$ the complexified Adjoint representation is irreducible, with highest weight $e_1+e_2$.

For $n=2$, the roots split into the two independent systems $\{\pm (e_1+e_2)\}$ and $\{\pm (e_1-e_2)\}$. The Adjoint representation splits into two irreducibles of dimension three, with respective highest weights $(1,1)$ and $(1,-1)$. Equivalently these are the self-dual and anti-self-dual exterior two-forms in four dimensions. Their characters areThey add to the displayed adjoint character. This agrees with the Chiral decomposition of the complexified so4 Lie algebra.

For a direct character comparison, put $s(z)={\sum }_i(z_i+z_i^{-1})$. The eigenvalue formula for an exterior square givesThis is precisely ${\chi }_{\mathrm{ad}}$. More intrinsically, let $B$ be the nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form preserved by $SO(2n)$ and defineThis endomorphism is skew with respect to $B$, so $\Psi$ maps ${\Lambda }^{2}E$ to $\mathfrak{so}(E,B)$. In an orthonormal basis the bivectors $e_i\wedge e_j$ map to a basis of skew skew-symmetric matrices, proving that it is an isomorphism. Since $B$ is invariant,Thus the exterior square and the complexified Adjoint representation are naturally isomorphic, explaining the character equality without a weight calculation.

The symmetric square is not irreducible. The inverse metric tensor $\Omega$ is a nonzero invariant vector, and contraction with $B$ splits off its trivial line:The contraction sends $\Omega$ to $2n$, so this is indeed a direct sum. A highest-weight vector $f_1\otimes f_1$, where $f_1$ has torus weight $e_1$, lies in the traceless part because $B(f_1,f_1)=0$, and has highest weight $2e_1$. The same dimension formula gives, for $n\ge 2$,This equals $\dim {\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}E-1=n(2n+1)-1$. Complete reducibility therefore proves that the traceless part is irreducible, including the dimension-nine case for $SO(4)$. In particular,If the circle case $n=1$ is included, the adjoint character is $1$ and the symmetric square instead has three one-dimensional weights $2,0,-2$.

Use the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2, which states that $V_m\otimes V_n\cong {⨁}_{j=0}^{\min (m,n)}{V}_{m+n-2j}$. Here this givesTo determine symmetry, realize the tensor product as polynomials in two pairs of variables. A highest-weight vector in the $j$th summand can be chosen proportional to $(x_1{y}_2-y_1{x}_2{)}^j{x}_1^{3-j}{x}_2^{3-j}$. Exchanging the two factors multiplies it by $(-1{)}^j$, and hence multiplies the entire irreducible summand by that sign. Even $j$ belong to the symmetric square, odd $j$ to the exterior square. ThusTheir dimensions are respectively $7+3=10$ and $5+1=6$, as required for a four-dimensional space.

Let $U$ be a four-dimensional symplectic vector space, with a symplectic basis $e_1,f_1,e_2,f_2$. Its invariant inverse-form bivector may be chosen as $\eta =e_1\wedge f_1+e_2\wedge f_2$. Put $\mathrm{vol}=e_1\wedge f_1\wedge e_2\wedge f_2$, so $\eta \wedge \eta =2\mathrm{vol}$. Define a symmetric bilinear form on the six-dimensional exterior square byIt is symmetric because both factors have degree two. It is nondegenerate: in the six-element wedge basis, every $e_a\wedge e_b$ pairs nontrivially with the wedge of the complementary pair and with no other basis vector. Since $B(\eta ,\eta )=2$, the orthogonal complementhas dimension five and inherits a nondegenerate bilinear form. It is the primitive exterior square, equivalently the kernel of the symplectic contraction of an exterior square.

The symplectic Lie algebra preserves $\eta$. It also preserves $\mathrm{vol}$, since its elements have trace zero and the induced action on ${\Lambda }^{4}U$ is multiplication by that trace. The exterior-power Lie algebra representation therefore preserves $B$ and $W$, giving a Lie algebra homomorphismTo show injectivity, suppose $A$ acts as zero on $W$. It already acts as zero on the invariant line $\mathbb{C}\eta$, so it kills all of ${\Lambda }^{2}U=W\oplus \mathbb{C}\eta$. For any basis $u_1,\dots ,u_4$, this meansIf $k\ne i$, choose $j$ distinct from $i,k$; the coefficient of $u_k\wedge u_j$ forces $A_{ki}=0$. Thus $A$ is diagonal. The same identity gives $A_{ii}+A_{jj}=0$ for every pair. Applying this to three distinct indices forces each diagonal entry to vanish. Hence $A=0$ and $\Phi$ is injective.

Finally $\dim {\mathfrak{sp}}_4=2(2\cdot 2+1)=10$ and $\dim \mathfrak{so}(W,B)=5\cdot 4/2=10$. Injectivity between these equal-dimensional vector spaces gives surjectivity. Every nondegenerate complex symmetric bilinear form on a five-dimensional space is equivalent to the standard one. We have therefore constructed the exceptional isomorphism between sp4 and so5:

Use the ordered alphabetwith weights $\mathrm{wt}(i)={\epsilon }_i$ and $\mathrm{wt}(\bar{i})=-{\epsilon }_i$. The crystal of the defining symplectic representation is the chainThe label of an arrow is its simple root color; a Kashiwara operator ${\tilde{f}}_i$ follows an arrow of color $i$ and lowers the weight by ${\alpha }_i$.

Here is a grid description of the entire tensor product of crystals, valid for every $n$. Put one vertex $a\otimes b$ at row $a$ and column $b$, in the alphabet order above. Let $P_i$ be the set of chain positions with outgoing color $i$, and $Q_i$ the positions with incoming color $i$:Their indicators are ${\phi }_i$ and ${\epsilon }_i$. Use the crystal tensor-product ruleAn arrow is omitted if the selected factor has no outgoing arrow of that color. Thus the complete grid has a downward color-$i$ arrow when $a\in P_i$ and $b\notin Q_i$, and a rightward color-$i$ arrow when $b\in P_i$ and $a\notin P_i$. There are no other arrows. These two coordinate rules specify every vertex and every edge of the requested general-rank drawing. The following figure displays the full grid at $n=3$, including all components, together with the standard chain; increasing $n$ uses exactly the same grid construction.

For completeness, highest vertices can be read from the raising rule, which selects the first factor when ${\phi }_i(a)\ge {\epsilon }_i(b)$. If $a$ has an incoming edge of color $i$, then ${\phi }_i(a)=0$; either the raising operator acts nontrivially on $a$, or ${\epsilon }_i(b)=1$ and it acts nontrivially on $b$. Thus a highest vertex must have $a=1$. At $a=1$, all ${\phi }_i(a)$ vanish except ${\phi }_1(a)=1$. To be highest, the incoming color of $b$, if any, must consequently be $1$. For $n\ge 2$, the possibilities are exactlyTheir weights are $2{\epsilon }_1=2{\omega }_1$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2={\omega }_2$, and zero. Each occurs once. Connected highest-weight components of the crystal basis describe the irreducible representations in the tensor product of Lie algebra representations, soThis is the tensor-square decomposition of the defining symplectic representation. The symmetric square is $L(2{\omega }_1)$; the exterior square is the direct sum of its invariant inverse-form line and the primitive exterior square $L({\omega }_2)$. Their dimensions are respectively $n(2n+1)$, $n(2n-1)-1$, and one, summing to $4n^2=\dim (V\otimes V)$. At $n=1$, the chain has two vertices and the highest tensor vertices are only $1\otimes 1$ and $1\otimes \bar{1}$: the decomposition is $L(2{\omega }_1)\oplus L(0)$, of dimensions three and one.

For a decreasing integer tuple $\lambda =({\lambda }_1,\dots ,{\lambda }_m)$, let ${\mu }_i={\lambda }_i-{\lambda }_m$. Then $\mu$ is a partition and the highest-weight classification of rational GL representations definesThis is a determinant twist of a Schur module. Every irreducible rational $G{L}_m$ representation becomes polynomial after multiplication by a sufficiently large positive determinant power, which clears all matrix-entry denominators. The polynomial degree decomposition and Schur–Weyl duality then identify it with a Schur module. Undoing the twist gives exactly one decreasing integer tuple $\lambda$. Distinct tuples have distinct highest torus weights, so these are the complete pairwise nonisomorphic irreducible rational representations.

The Weyl character formula specializes toIt is a symmetric Laurent polynomial in the eigenvalues. Equality extends from the dense set of diagonalizable matrices to all invertible matrices: both the character and the expression in the characteristic-polynomial coefficients are regular functions on $G{L}_m$. For a polynomial representation this also extends to every endomorphism of $V$. For a general rational representation, the printed claim at singular endomorphisms needs this qualification: for example ${\det }^{-1}$ is undefined at a singular matrix. The displayed formula is valid on $G{L}_m$, and on all of $\mathrm{End}(V)$ when ${\lambda }_m\ge 0$.

To compute the degree, set $x_j=e^{t{c}_j}$ with distinct $c_j$ and take $t\to 0$. For ${\ell }_i={\lambda }_i+m-i$ and $d=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{m}{2}\right)$, the leading coefficient of an exponential alternant isIndeed, expand every exponential in powers of $t$. The first nonzero determinant uses the distinct powers $0,1,\dots ,m-1$; its coefficient is the product of the two Vandermonde determinants divided by $\prod k!$. Taking the same expansion in the denominator cancels the powers and the $c$ factors, giving the Weyl dimension formulaThis proof works for negative ${\lambda }_m$ as well, since determinant twists have dimension one.

Every finite-dimensional rational module is completely reducible. The characters of its irreducible constituents are linearly independent: each Schur Laurent character has its highest dominant monomial $x^{\lambda }$ with coefficient $1$, and only lower weights besides it. In a finite relation, choose a lexicographically highest remaining weight; its coefficient must vanish, and iterate. Therefore equal characters give equal multiplicities of every irreducible constituent, proving rational modules with the same character are isomorphic.

Finally the symmetric algebra of $V\oplus {\Lambda }^{2}V$ has the formal torus characterEach factor sums the symmetric powers of a one-dimensional weight space; the exterior square has weights $x_i{x}_j$ for $i<j$. The permitted Schur identity makes this ${\sum }_{\lambda }{s}_{\lambda }(x)$. In each fixed scalar degree there are only finitely many terms, so complete reducibility and character independence apply degree by degree without a convergence assumption. Thus the multiplicity-free symmetric-algebra model for polynomial GL representations contains each irreducible polynomial representation exactly once. The word irreducible is necessary: arbitrary reducible polynomial modules, such as two copies of the trivial module, do not each occur once in a multiplicity-free sum.

Use $x^{\pm }=(x^0\pm x^{D-1})/\sqrt{2}$, transverse coordinates $x^i$, $i=1,\dots ,d=D-2$, and the Minkowski metricThe relativistic particle phase-space action becomesIn the light cone gauge $x^{+}=t$, solve the mass-shell condition for $p_{+}$, assuming $p_{-}\ne 0$. The reduced phase-space action is $\int dt({\dot{x}}^{-}{p}_{-}+{\dot{x}}^i{p}_i-H)$, withThe last equality selects the future-directed momentum sector and makes positivity transparent. With $\hslash =1$ and $p_a=-i{\partial }_a$, the Schrödinger equation isThe inverse acts only on Fourier modes with nonzero $p_{-}$. Multiplication by $2p_{-}$ gives $2{\partial }_{-}{\partial }_{+}\Psi =({\Delta }_{\perp }-{\mu }^2)\Psi$. ThereforeThe light-cone Hamiltonian thus gives the same Klein-Gordon equation as covariant quantization.

For the massive two-form field, take $\mu \ne 0$. Apply ${\partial }^n$ to its field equation. Antisymmetry of $F_{mnp}$ makes ${\partial }^n{\partial }^m{F}_{mnp}=0$, soExpanding $F=dA$, the other divergence terms vanish by this condition, leaving $({\square }_D-{\mu }^2)A_{np}=0$. The light-cone decomposition of a massive two-form makes its dependent components explicit. The divergence equation isTaking $n=-$ and $n=i$, respectively, givesThe $n=+$ equation follows from these expressions: the two terms containing ${\partial }_{+}{\partial }_i{A}_{-i}$ cancel and ${\partial }_i{\partial }_j{A}_{ji}=0$. Consequently $A_{-i}$ and $A_{ij}$ are independent, each satisfying the Klein-Gordon equation with mass $\mu$. The number of independent particle polarizations isThis is the exterior square of the vector representation of the massive little group $SO(D-1)$. In the analogous Proca equation, ${\partial }^m{A}_m=0$ determines $A_{+}$ from $A_{-}$ and $A_i$, leaving $D-1$ components. A massive field has no gauge freedom that would justify setting these longitudinal components to zero. If $\mu =0$, instead use the two-form gauge field symmetry $A\mapsto A+d\Lambda$: the light-cone gauge for a two-form removes $A_{-m}$, leaving $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{D-2}{2}\right)$ transverse particle polarizations. The massive and massless counts are different.

In the closed-string mode expansion, $x^m,p_m$ are center-of-mass canonical variables, while ${\alpha }_k^i,{\tilde{\alpha }}_k^i$ are independent left- and right-moving transverse string oscillators. Their complex conjugates are ${\alpha }_{-k}^i,{\tilde{\alpha }}_{-k}^i$. The two zero-mode Lagrange multipliers impose the remaining mass-shell condition and closed-string level matching. The string level operators areTheir quantum definitions use normal ordering. The symplectic terms in the phase-space action givewith all brackets between distinct sectors zero. The nonzero-index string oscillators obey ${\alpha }_n^{i†}={\alpha }_{-n}^i$ and similarly for the right-moving sector. Define the momentum-labelled oscillator vacuum byFor $k>0$, $a_k^i={\alpha }_k^i/\sqrt{k}$ has $[a_k^i,a_l^{j†}]={\delta }_{kl}{\delta }^{ij}$. HenceStarting with $N|0;p⟩=0$, a finite product with $r_{ki}$ creation operators of mode $k$ has eigenvalue ${\sum }_{k,i}k{r}_{ki}$. The Fock space is generated by these products; both level operators have nonnegative integer eigenvalues. This establishes the integer string oscillator level property. Subtracting their physical zero-mode constraints enforces $N=\tilde{N}$.

There is a distinction between the displayed classical zero modes and their quantum constraints. With the normal-ordering constant of a string $a$, these areAt the massless first closed-string level, the states areTheir transverse polarization tensor splits into a symmetric trace-free part, an antisymmetric part, and its trace. These are the graviton, Kalb–Ramond field, and dilaton, with respective particle polarization counts $d(d+1)/2-1$, $d(d-1)/2$, and one. They have the transverse little group representations of massless particles. In a Lorentz-consistent bosonic string theory, the first chiral level is a massless vector, not a massive vector with one missing physical polarization; the closed-string products are therefore massless. This fixes $a=1$. Equivalently, regularized transverse zero-point energy gives $a=(D-2)/24$, and Lorentz consistency fixes the critical dimension of the bosonic string $D=26$.

It follows that the bosonic string mass spectrum isThe ground state has $M_0^2=-8\pi T$ and is a tachyon; level one is massless; for $N\ge 2$ the mass is $M_N=\sqrt{8\pi T(N-1)}$. The masslessness claim uses the consistent quantum theory, rather than an unshifted reading of the classical $L_0$.

A massive two-form at closed-string level two is present. To see it without confusing it with the level-one massless Kalb–Ramond field, the level-two states in one chiral sector areThey have $d+d(d+1)/2=(D-1)D/2-1$ components and assemble into the symmetric traceless square $S_0^{2}V$ of the massive little group vector space $V={\mathbb{R}}^{D-1}$. The full closed-string level is $S_0^{2}V\otimes S_0^{2}V$. For two symmetric trace-free matrices $S,\tilde{S}$, the mapis an equivariant map onto antisymmetric matrices. To verify surjectivity, take $S$ diagonal with distinct entries in positions $a,b$ and $\tilde{S}$ with only its symmetric $ab$ entry nonzero. Their commutator gives the $ab$ antisymmetric basis element. Finite-dimensional representations of the compact little group are completely reducible, so this quotient representation is also a subrepresentation. It has exactly $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{D-1}{2}\right)$ particle polarizations and is described by the massive field equation with ${\mu }^2=8\pi T$. At $D=26$ this gives 300 particle polarizations, consisting in light-cone coordinates of 24 components $A_{-i}$ and 276 components $A_{ij}$.

Define the exterior square over the arbitrary field $k$ by ${\bigwedge }^{2}V=(V\otimes V)/\mathrm{span}\{v\otimes v:v\in V\}$. Write the image of $u\otimes v$ as $u\wedge v$. Then $v\wedge v=0$ and $u\wedge v=-v\wedge u$; the basis is $v_i\wedge v_j$ with $i<j$, in characteristic two as well. The exterior-power Lie algebra representation isThe tensor product of Lie algebra representations descends to this quotient: $x\cdot (v\otimes v)=xv\otimes v+v\otimes xv$ is a linear combination of square tensors, namely $(v+xv)\otimes (v+xv)-v\otimes v-xv\otimes xv$. On the wedge basis its coefficients follow directly from the original representing matrices. Expanding both actions shows $[{\rho }_{{\wedge }^2}(x),{\rho }_{{\wedge }^2}(y)]={\rho }_{{\wedge }^2}([x,y])$.

The inclusions of $V$ and $W$ into their direct sum define the mapA combined basis shows that this sends a basis to the pure-$V$, pure-$W$ and mixed wedge basis vectors, with no overlap and no omission. The defining action on each wedge proves equivariance. Hence the exterior square of a direct sum givesNo division by $2$ is involved, so the proof remains valid in characteristic two.

For the complex special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$, write ${\Gamma }_{a,b}$ for the irreducible highest-weight representation with Dynkin labels $(a,b)$, and $V={\Gamma }_{1,0}$. First the sl3 decomposition of the symmetric-square dual tensor product isIndeed contraction $c((uv)\otimes f)=f(u)v+f(v)u$ is a surjective Lie algebra representation homomorphism onto $V$. Its 15-dimensional kernel contains the highest-weight vector $e_1^2\otimes e_3^{\ast }$ of weight $(2,1)$. The Weyl dimension formula gives $\dim {\Gamma }_{2,1}=15$, and the Weyl complete reducibility theorem identifies the kernel and splits the map. With $B={\Gamma }_{2,1}$, the direct-sum identity reduces the requested calculation to ${\bigwedge }^{2}B$, $B\otimes V$ and ${\bigwedge }^{2}V$.

For completeness, these decompositions can be checked entirely by formal characters. Let $x_1{x}_2{x}_3=1$, $h_1=x_1+x_2+x_3$, $h_1^{\ast }=x_1^{-1}+x_2^{-1}+x_3^{-1}$ and $h_2={\sum }_i{x}_i^2+{\sum }_{i<j}{x}_i{x}_j$. Then ${\chi }_B=h_2{h}_1^{\ast }-h_1$. The Weyl character formula takes the determinant formSubstitute ${\chi }_B$ into ${\chi }_{{\wedge }^{2}B}(x)=\frac{1}{2}({\chi }_B(x{)}^2-{\chi }_B(x_1^2,x_2^2,x_3^2))$ and collect the determinant characters. This gives the exterior square of the sl3 representation of highest weight (2,1) and the sl3 highest-weight tensor rule:The first line has dimensions $21+42+24+15+3=105=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{15}{2}\right)$; the tensor product has dimension $24+15+6=45$. Equivalently, enumerate weights with the sl3 interlacing character formula and subtract characters from the highest weight downwards. FinallyIts dimension is $21+42+48+30+6+6=153=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{18}{2}\right)$. The exterior square here is taken of the entire 18-dimensional tensor product; taking it only of $S^{2}V$ would be a different representation.

Solving the massive subsidiary conditions. In light-cone coordinates, use $d{s}^2=-2d{X}^{+}d{X}^{-}+{\delta }_{IJ}d{X}^{I}d{X}^J$ and write $d=D-2$. The divergence condition readsThus, when ${\partial }_{-}$ is invertible,First apply this with $n=-$, then with $n=I$, and finally with $n=+$; symmetry supplies the mixed components already determined. The trace condition becomesThe independent components are $h_{--}$, $h_{-I}$ and the trace-free part of $h_{IJ}$. Under transverse rotations they form a scalar representation, a vector representation, and a symmetric traceless rank-two tensor. ThereforeThis is the light-cone decomposition of a massive spin-two field for $D\ge 3$. In $D=2$, the trace and divergence give $h_{+-}=h_{++}=0$ and ${\partial }_{+}{h}_{--}=0$. The massive wave equation then forces $h_{--}=0$, so there are no polarizations, consistent with the zero value of the printed count. The massive particle little group is $SO(D-1)=SO(d+1)$, and its symmetric traceless square branches asThe mixed components with the extra direction give the vector; one independent trace combination gives the scalar. These are exactly the polarizations of a massive spin-two field. The remaining independent components retain the massive Klein-Gordon equation.