Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 59 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use natural units and the Minkowski metric . Multiplication of the block gamma matrices givesThe Pauli matrices obey , so the spatial anticommutators are , the mixed ones are zero, and the temporal one is . ThusBecause partial derivatives commute, only the symmetric part of survives in their contraction. Multiplying the Dirac equation on the left by its opposite-mass factor therefore gives the flat-space Dirac factorizationHence every component satisfies , the Klein-Gordon equation. This implication does not remove the first-order spinor constraints imposed by the Dirac equation.
For Lorentz covariance, transform coordinates by and the Dirac spinor by . The chain rule gives . ConsequentlyThe cancellation uses . Thus the Lorentz transformation maps every solution to another, establishing the Lorentz covariance of the Dirac operator.
The infinitesimal identity follows directly from the Clifford algebra. Moving past the two factors givesSubtracting the same identity with interchanged proves the spinor Lorentz generator commutatorContracting with the antisymmetric tensor yieldsIt also verifies for the infinitesimal Spinor representation of the Lorentz group.
For a positive-energy four-momentum, put , . The Dirac equation becomes , where the Feynman slash notation uses . Splitting givesThe second equation sets , and the first is then the mass shell, since . Choosing two orthonormal two-spinors gives the Dirac plane waves in the standard representation:The negative-frequency solutions are independentlywith orthonormal . They are the antiparticle modes after field quantization. The normalization gives and , , using the Dirac adjoint .
For a spatial rotation, . Hence the intrinsic rotation generators areFor a massive particle in its rest frame, the two independent spinors therefore carry the two-dimensional spin one-half representation, with eigenvalues and Casimir . A rotation acts as , the spinor sign under a full spatial rotation. Thus the particle has spin ; four spinor components encode particle and antiparticle sectors, not four spin states of one particle. In the massless limit the corresponding physical labels are helicities rather than a rest-frame spin basis.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 62 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the Minkowski metric and Feynman slash notation . The Pauli matrices satisfy . In the Dirac representation of the gamma matrices, direct block multiplication givesandThus the spatial anticommutators are , proving the Clifford relationsSince partial derivatives commute, their symmetric product selects the symmetric part of the gamma matrices. Multiplying the Dirac equation by givesHence every spinor component satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation with the same mass.
For parity, let and . The chain rule gives and . Combining these signs with provesThis establishes parity symmetry in quantum field theory for the free Dirac equation, rather than merely asserting its covariance.
A positive-energy plane wave solves . Write . The two block equations areThe second gives . In the first, and make the remaining coefficient zero. There are two independent two-component choices , soFor a massive Dirac spinor, choose as the two rest-frame spin states along a fixed axis, for example . The label distinguishes these canonical spin states after boosting; it is not automatically a helicity label.
Now and for the same fixed . ThereforeThe parity action on canonical massive spin states leaves the canonical spin label unchanged while reversing the momentum. Spin is an axial vector under parity; its orientation is unchanged. Consequently helicity, the projection of spin along momentum, reverses. If had instead been chosen to denote helicity, the transformed label would have the opposite sign.
The Dirac adjoint is , with . ThusThe chirality matrix has in this representation, so and it anticommutes with every . In particular . The parity transformation of a Dirac bilinear therefore yieldsThe first bilinear is a scalar under parity, whereas the second is a pseudoscalar.
For the requested gamma matrix trace identities, use the cyclic property of the trace. Conjugation of a product of gamma matrices by multiplies it by , but leaves its trace unchanged. All odd products therefore have zero trace. Taking the trace of the Clifford algebra relation and using gives . For four factors, move the first gamma matrix successively past the next three using the anticommutators. If , this givesThus . Contracting with the relevant four-vectors proves all four answers:
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 44 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use throughout. Vary the Maxwell action with respect to the electromagnetic four-potential. Antisymmetry of the electromagnetic field tensor gives . After integration by parts, the Euler-Lagrange field equation isA gauge transformation leaves unchanged because partial derivatives commute. It therefore leaves the Maxwell action and observable electromagnetic fields unchanged: different potentials represent the same physical field. This redundancy matters for canonical quantization: before gauge fixing, the momentum conjugate to vanishes and the four potential components cannot be treated as four independent physical oscillators.
Choose the Lorenz gauge , attainable by solving with suitable boundary data. The Euler-Lagrange field equation then reduces toResidual Lorenz gauge symmetry consists of transformations with . The gauge condition and this residual redundancy ultimately leave two transverse polarizations of a free photon.
For the specified kinetic density , one has . Its Euler-Lagrange field equation is therefore . This density is the Feynman-gauge Maxwell kinetic density after a boundary-term subtraction, sinceThe divergence follows by expanding both sides and commuting the second derivatives. Thus the wave equation follows from a Feynman gauge action; the additional physical-state condition will implement the Lorenz gauge. One must not impose inside the original action before varying it.
Take the covariant components as canonical coordinates. The canonical momentum computed from isThe equal-time canonical Poisson brackets are , with coordinate-coordinate and momentum-momentum brackets zero. Applying canonical quantization givesIn particular . The negative temporal sign is the source of the indefinite state-space norm in covariant photon quantization.
The spatial Fourier transform of the wave equation gives an oscillator of frequency for each component. The Hermitian adjoint condition on the electromagnetic four-potential then yields the mode expansion of a free fieldThese are massless on shell modes. Consistently with the preceding equal-time canonical commutation relation,The normalization is the same as for the scalar modes, with replacing the species identity matrix.
Gupta-Bleuler quantization starts with the Fock vacuum annihilated by every and imposes only the annihilation, or positive-frequency part of a quantum field, of the Lorenz gauge condition:Imposing the entire Hermitian field divergence as a strong operator identity would be incompatible with the four-component canonical commutation relation. The weaker condition suffices: between two physical states its positive-frequency part vanishes on the ket, and its negative-frequency part vanishes on the bra. Hence .
For a one-photon state , commuting the constraint through the creator givesThus the allowed photon polarization vectors satisfy . Their state inner product, with the common momentum-normalization factor suppressed, is . Momentum eigenstates are delta-normalized; the same statements hold with finite norms for normalizable wave packets.
Rotate the spatial axes so that . The constraint is , so the complete allowed family isThe first vector is the allowed longitudinal gauge polarization, proportional to the null four-momentum . Its state has zero norm because ; it is also orthogonal to every constrained state because . A purely spatial vector alone is not an allowed physical polarization: its time component must accompany it to satisfy the constraint. The other two vectors are transverse polarizations, perpendicular to , with positive unit norms. For the displayed family,The timelike negative-norm excitation has been excluded by the constraint, and the remaining form is positive semidefinite. The Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient identifies and , removing the null direction. It leaves exactly two transverse physical photon polarizations with a positive inner product; their bosonic Fock space is the physical photon state space.
Finally use Feynman slash notation, , and impose four-momentum conservation . The external Dirac spinors obeySet and . Replacing by in the first term of the electron-positron annihilation into two photons amplitude, the rightmost contracted vertex obeysSince the Clifford algebra implies , that term becomesFor the second term, four-momentum conservation gives . The contracted vertex is now adjacent to the outgoing positron spinor on the left, soConsequentlyThe two terms cancel, proving the two-photon fermion Ward identityExchanging the two photon labels proves the same result for . By linearity the amplitude is invariant under on either external photon leg. Therefore the null longitudinal gauge polarization has zero production amplitude: physical scattering produces only the two transverse photon polarizations. This cancellation also shows why both photon orderings in the tree-level Feynman diagrams are essential; either term alone fails the Ward identity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 44 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take incoming electron momentum and positron momentum , with outgoing photon momenta , so . The leading electron-positron annihilation into two photons has two tree-level Feynman diagrams, differing by the order in which the two outgoing photons attach to the charged-fermion line.
The two photon orders in electron-positron annihilation and the s and u channels of Compton scattering
. Details. The arrows indicate fermion flow. An incoming positron has the opposite flow direction to its physical momentum; the lower row uses an outgoing electron instead.
The required QED Feynman rules, with interaction , are a vertex , a Dirac propagator , an incoming electron spinor , an incoming positron adjoint , and an outgoing photon polarization . Here Feynman slash notation means , and the external Dirac equations are and .
Put , omitting only the propagator's overall factor . Multiplying the two vertices and the propagator givesThe diagrammatic expression is . The relative sign is plus because the two photons are bosons; exchanging their attachments does not exchange external fermions. The amplitude is of order .
A physical photon polarization vector obeys and , with the gauge equivalence . One can choose a transverse representative with and normalize . There are two physical transverse polarizations.
To prove the requested two-photon fermion Ward identity, replace by . Away from an internal pole, is the inverse of , with the boundary prescription understood. The first term simplifies becauseFor the second term, four-momentum conservation gives , soThe two contributions are therefore and , which cancel. Interchanging the photon labels proves the other contraction vanishes. By linearity, adding a multiple of either photon momentum to its polarization leaves the summed amplitude unchanged. This is gauge invariance: longitudinal gauge representatives do not describe an additional physical photon state. An individual diagram does not generally have this property.
For Compton scattering, let be incoming electron and photon momenta and the outgoing ones. The diagrams in the lower row have intermediate electron momenta and respectively. The same QED Feynman rules giveTheir denominators are and , the - and -channel denominators. In annihilation the two exchanged-electron channels instead carry and . Crossing symmetry relates the two expressions by moving the positron to an outgoing electron and one outgoing photon to an incoming photon, with the corresponding momentum and polarization replacements. There is no two-photon contact vertex for the minimally coupled Dirac electron. Both processes require the sum of the two photon orders to satisfy the Ward identity.
