Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 62 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A phase-space distribution function describes the mass in a small cell of positions and velocities: is that mass. Its velocity integral is the spatial mass density, and at a fixed position is a normalized velocity probability density. A number-normalized galactic distribution function differs by the stellar mass convention.
Take and . For the cusped logarithmic spherical galaxy model, differentiate the gravitational potential and use the spherical Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity:ThusA circular orbit requires . Its galaxy rotation curve is thereforeIt rises as at small radius and approaches from below at large radius.
The outer flat galaxy rotation curve is qualitatively useful for galaxies. However, the density has an inner cusp and an outer tail, while diverges. The model therefore requires an outer truncation for a finite galaxy, and does not describe a central constant-density core. Its gravitational potential cannot be normalized to zero at infinity.
For a star, the specific energy is and the specific angular momentum is . Since the gravitational potential is stationary and spherical,Thus both the specific energy and the entire angular-momentum vector are conserved.
For Jeans theorem, follow a stellar trajectory in phase space. The Collisionless Boltzmann equation is preciselyIn a steady system , so the value of the galactic distribution function is constant along every trajectory: it is itself an integral of motion. Conversely, if are time-independent integrals of motion, then satisfies . Locally, a complete set of invariant orbit labels expresses any steady galactic distribution function this way. This is the weak form of Jeans theorem; a stronger assertion about a small set of isolating integrals needs additional orbital regularity or mixing assumptions. In particular, the theorem does not say that every steady galaxy must have a galactic distribution function depending on only and .
For the proposed constant-anisotropy distribution function, write and . Introduce a polar angle in the tangential velocity plane. Then , so the apparent singularity cancels against the velocity Jacobian. This inverse-angular-momentum velocity integration makes the density finite for every .
Let , , , and . Each exponential component contributesHere the two Gaussian integrals and the angular integral have product . Consequently,The galactic distribution function is nonnegative, gives the required density, and depends on conserved ; by Jeans theorem it is a self-consistent steady solution.
Differentiating the Gaussian integral with respect to shows that each component has , and the same value for . Angular averaging gives . Weighting these by yields the velocity dispersionsThe radial numerator includes , as in the original PDF. All mean velocities vanish by parity. The same parity, or the zero angular average of , gives .
The velocity-anisotropy parameter isThe constant-anisotropy distribution function therefore favors radial motion at every radius: the radial variance is twice either individual tangential variance. It still has a substantial population with nonzero angular momentum, rather than exclusively radial orbits. The factor enhances low-angular-momentum stars. The radial velocity dispersion approaches at the centre and far out; each individual tangential variance is half as large. There is no mean rotation, despite the well-defined galaxy rotation curve for hypothetical circular orbits.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 72 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The stationary points of the exponent are and , because . The first is a local maximum with and ; the second is a local minimum. Alsoso the endpoint overtakes the interior maximum only when .
For fixed , the upper endpoint is the unique maximum. Linearizing the exponent there gives the Laplace endpoint estimate . At , only half of the local Gaussian integral is included. For , the whole Gaussian near contributes. At an endpoint has the same exponential height, but its prefactor is , smaller than the interior prefactor. For , the endpoint has strictly greater height and dominates.
Consequently all fixed- regimes areThe estimate follows from Laplace's method; the tail toward negative infinity is exponentially harmless since the cubic tends to negative infinity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 76 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
PutIn free space, the parabolic wave equation is . Under the Fourier transform convention , it becomesThe Gaussian integral is legitimate because . Invert the transform after multiplying by . A second Gaussian integral, or equivalently one-dimensional transverse Fresnel propagation, givesChoose the square-root branch continuously from ; for real there is no zero of . This gives the correct incident field at , and direct differentiation verifies the free parabolic wave equation.
For clarity, the squared envelope magnitude isThe Gaussian beam with one transverse coordinate remains Gaussian, with one-transverse-coordinate amplitude factor , not the of a beam with two transverse coordinates. The negative initial quadratic phase produces focusing for ; diffraction prevents a singularity at . These expressions describe the paraxial approximation to free propagation, rather than an exact unrestricted Helmholtz equation beam.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 81 3 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Set and . For the reflected images, the intervals , , tile the real line once. A Gaussian integral givesConsequently . The Poisson summation formula applied to the Gaussian yieldsThe zero dual mode cancels the reflected contribution, while the positive and negative modes pair:This proves equality with the energy eigenstate calculation. The image expansion converges rapidly at small ; the spectral expansion converges rapidly at large .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 8 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For the normalized standard Gaussian density,The two terms cancel, so the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Fokker-Planck equation has stationary density for a Fokker-Planck equationEquivalently its Fokker-Planck probability current vanishes identically. The normalization follows from the Gaussian integral in each coordinate.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 2 4F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
The moment-generating function of a random variable is , at the real values of for which that expectation is finite. For a standard normal distribution variable , combining the exponentials in its probability density function yieldsThe last equality follows by scaling the Gaussian integral. The variables are independent random variables, so the expectation of their product factorizes. ThereforeThis is the moment-generating function of a chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom. For positive the defining integral diverges at and above .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 3 15B a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the Fourier transform . For a rapidly decaying smooth function, integration by parts gives , and differentiation under the integral gives . Both are justified here by Gaussian decay. Since ,The Gaussian integral supplied in the hint gives . Solving this first-order equation yieldsThe calculation states the transform normalization and the two differentiation properties explicitly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 126 5 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The constant Fourier coefficient is . The terms give . For fixed , unfolding the sum over givesIndeed, the substitution introduces a factor , while the translated intervals of length cover the real line exactly times, cancelling that factor. Now scale . The beta function integral yieldswhich can be checked by inserting and evaluating the inner Gaussian integral. Thus the fixed- contribution is . Summing over positive and negative proves the constant term of a nonholomorphic Eisenstein seriesWith the printed normalization of the completed Riemann zeta function, this is exactlyBoth the unfolding and the original series calculation are justified for . Beyond this region the identities are understood meromorphically: is the Epstein zeta function of the unit-covolume lattice , so question 4 supplies its continuation. The symbol here has the completed-zeta normalization displayed above, which has poles at zero and one; it does not include the extra polynomial factor sometimes used to define an entire xi function.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 304 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the Euclidean path integral with weight and Fourier transform convention . The momentum-space Feynman rules are: an internal scalar propagator ; a quartic vertex together with for incoming momenta; and an integral over each independent loop momentum. Multiply by the Feynman-diagram symmetry factor; external propagators are retained for a full correlation function and removed for an amputated connected correlation function.
To enumerate the requested one-particle-irreducible Feynman diagrams, let be the number of quartic vertices and the number of internal edges. Four external legs imply , while one loop order implies . Thus . Both internal edges must connect the two vertices: an alternative with a tadpole and one connecting edge would disconnect on cutting that edge. The only graphs are therefore the three pairings of labelled external legs, each with Feynman-diagram symmetry factor .
The corresponding channel momenta are , , and , with all external momenta incoming. This exhausts the connected one-loop four-point one-particle-irreducible Feynman diagrams.
For the Euclidean massive loop integral, first take and an integer , where the integral converges. Schwinger parameterization givesThe supplied Gaussian integral then yieldsIntegrating over , and using the Gamma function recurrence to obtain , provesOutside its initial convergence range, the right-hand side defines the meromorphic continuation used in dimensional regularization; the divergent ordinary integral is not being assigned a convergent value.
For the scalar bubble integral, the Feynman parameter identity followed by a translation of loop momentum givesWith , the Gamma function satisfies , and the parameter integral tends to one. Hence the ultraviolet pole is independent of external momentum:One can also see why the same pole occurs without introducing a Feynman parameter: at large , the difference between this integrand and is ultraviolet integrable near four dimensions, so both have the same dimensional regularization pole. The positive mass avoids an infrared ambiguity in this argument.
In the quantum effective action convention, the tree-level four-point vertex is , the negative of the amputated connected correlation function tree vertex. The three bubble corrections giveThus the pole counterterm is . The modified minimal subtraction scheme also subtracts the conventional finite combination, or equivalently absorbs it into the subtraction-scale convention; that does not change the one-loop renormalization-group beta function. Using that scale convention, writeHere is dimensionless, , and the conventional constant scale factor is implicit. The one-loop tadpole is momentum independent, so wave-function renormalization does not contribute at this order. Differentiating at fixed , with , gives . ThereforeFor the stable quartic scalar field theory, with , the one-loop quartic scalar beta function is positive: the running coupling increases toward the ultraviolet and decreases toward the infrared. The theory is not asymptotically free; extrapolating the one-loop flow gives a Landau pole.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 304 3 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Rescale with . After Berezin integration, the unnormalized holomorphic function insertion isIts derivative is an ordinary total derivative:The last equality again follows from polynomial growth and exponential decay. Thus the insertion is independent of , and supersymmetric localization allows evaluation as at the zeros of , as in localization of a zero-dimensional polynomial model.
For a simple zero , . The local Gaussian integral cancels the factor and contributes . For a zero with multiplicity of a root , write . Its leading radial integral isThe insertion tends to there; contributions away from the zeros vanish. Therefore the full answer, including degenerate critical points, isThis is an unnormalized expectation. For simple zeros all ; division by would give the normalized average, but is not part of the requested insertion. Taking recovers the partition function, and taking recovers its vanishing supersymmetric Ward identity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 335 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the time convention . The free-space Helmholtz equation, with , gives the exact reduced equationFor a forward plane wave at angle , and , whereas . Thus the paraxial approximation neglects relative to . The reduced field satisfies the parabolic wave equationWith the Fourier transform convention used below and its inverse, this becomes an ordinary differential equation for each transverse wavenumber:Consequently the initial-value solution isEquivalently, evaluating the oscillatory Gaussian integral gives the one-dimensional transverse Fresnel propagation formulaThe square-root branch has . The formula is an oscillatory integral for general data, or the Fresnel propagator acting on square-integrable functions. It approaches the initial field as . A plane wave has transverse wavenumber ; the reduced axial phase agrees with through order . This also checks the sign. The paraxial approximation applies to .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 336 1 b i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Set . At the positive real endpoint the contour is real and crosses the saddle point at zero. The Gaussian integral givesBoth omitted tails are exponentially small. At the negative real endpoint the contour is oriented leftward and does not cross the saddle point:The endpoint contribution in steepest descent, or one integration by parts, gives . The upper-end correction is and is much smaller. ThereforeThe sign comes from contour orientation, not from a different Gaussian convention.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ib Paper 2 17B b ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
The sudden approximation keeps the wavefunction unchanged at the instant of switching: a finite step of potential creates no delta-function impulse in the Schrodinger equation. Just before switching the old ground state differs from the printed real wavefunction only by an overall phase, which does not affect probabilities.
Let , , be the new ground state. Its overlap with the initial state is, up to that phase,Since , the Gaussian integral gives . The Born rule and the ground-state overlap after sudden oscillator displacement thus giveThis is an overlap probability, not a claim that the original wavefunction instantaneously relaxes to the new ground state. It becomes one when .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 304 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use a real orthonormal basis of Fourier modes on the time circle:The eigenvalue of on the constant mode is , and each sine/cosine pair has eigenvalue . Retaining these modes giveswhere can depend on but is independent of . Each real Gaussian integral contributes . Consequently the Fourier-cutoff oscillator functional determinant isA spectral cutoff between successive eigenvalue pairs selects precisely this finite subspace. In comparing two frequencies, the displayed regularization keeps the same number of modes ; holding an absolute spectral threshold fixed need not give the same at finite cutoff.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 306 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use a genus-zero Polyakov path integral, target signature and all four momenta incoming. Define the Mandelstam variables by , , . The string mass-shell condition is and momentum conservation is , soThe reduced amplitude omits the overall momentum-conservation Dirac delta distribution and any conventional overall scattering-matrix phase. Interpret each tachyon vertex operator as normal ordered; self-contractions must not be included.
The free-boson worldsheet propagator is . Wick theorem then evaluates the normal-ordered exponential correlator as the Koba-Nielsen factorThe worldsheet zero mode supplies momentum conservation. Four vertices give and the sphere contributes through the string genus expansion, leaving .
The sphere's residual Möbius transformations fix three insertion points. In sphere gauge fixing for four string vertices, take . The worldsheet ghost fields, equivalently the Faddeev-Popov determinant for this residual group, supply . At finite , this determinant grows as , while the matter correlator decays as by momentum conservation and the tachyon mass shell; their product has a finite limit. Equivalently the weight- matter operator at infinity is normalized with , while the ghost pair uses the inverse factor. After stripping the fixed-position normalization, onlyremains. Here choose the standard complex-coordinate measure . With instead, the reduced normalization must acquire a factor two to give the same requested amplitude. Absolute vertex/sphere normalization is a convention; this choice fixes it consistently with the displayed prefactor.
Set , , . Then and the integrand is . To evaluate the complex beta integral first work where . This ensures convergence near , and infinity. Set and . Schwinger parameterization givesCompleting the square, the Gaussian integral is . Change variables to and ; their Jacobian determinant is . Integrating gives . The remaining integral is the ordinary beta function . ThusRestoring and substituting the Mandelstam variables proves the Virasoro–Shapiro amplitude:For physical scattering the original position integral generally fails to converge. The formula defines the amplitude by analytic continuation from the convergence domain, with the desired scattering boundary value at real poles; the convergent integral should not be claimed valid for every physical momentum.
The gamma function is a meromorphic function, with simple poles at nonpositive integers and no zeros, while its reciprocal is an entire function. Consequently it is a meromorphic function of the independent invariants and a crossing-symmetric scattering amplitude: permuting leaves it unchanged. Its generic channel poles areand the same tower in and . They represent the exchanged bosonic string mass spectrum: the tachyon, massless states including the graviton, and an infinite sequence of massive closed-string levels. There are no threshold branch cuts at this tree order.
A precise check of factorization is the Virasoro–Shapiro amplitude pole residue. Near , set in the nonsingular factor. The gamma function recurrence givesCombining this with showsThe residue is a degree- polynomial in , consistent with exchange up to spin and scattering-amplitude factorization. At exceptional kinematics reciprocal Gamma zeros can remove apparent poles. In particular, when both and approach nonpositive integers, the zero from cancels the putative double pole, leaving channel simple-pole terms. Thus one must not count products of numerator poles without using .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 336 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
First make explicit the usual method of steepest descent hypotheses: the saddle point is simple, and ; a contour deformation leads to the two descent arms with one clockwise half-indentation around the pole; and endpoints or other contour portions contribute smaller terms. The sign of the exponential matters: , so decay is toward valleys of .
Use a local analytic function as coordinate. Nondegeneracy allows an analytic square root after factoring the double zero of , so the coordinate can be chosen withThe sign of is selected by the orientation of the contour integral, with running from negative to positive real values. Matching cubic coefficients gives . The transformed amplitude therefore has the Laurent seriesThe Cauchy principal value contribution of the pole on the two real arms is zero by oddness. Its clockwise semicircular indentation contributes , since there. The regular term contributes the Gaussian integral . Consequently the simple saddle coinciding with a simple pole has the additive expansionThe remainder written here assumes the other contour contributions are negligible to that order. Otherwise the local result has to be supplemented by them. The next local correction is generically times the displayed exponential. If , it can vanish; odd Taylor terms integrate to zero between the symmetric arms. When , the leading term gives the printed asymptotic equivalence. When , asymptotic equivalence to zero is not meaningful: the additive formula is still valid and a regular saddle-point approximation may lead instead.
Nondegeneracy is necessary and is not explicitly printed. For a counterexample to the unrestricted reading, take , and . There is one critical point, but it is degenerate. Choose the contour from to , with a clockwise quarter-circle avoiding zero. Both rays are decaying valleys for . Their straight-ray contributions cancel, and the indentation gives , not . Thus the requested coefficient requires the simple saddle point and contour deformation assumptions above; the mere existence of one critical point is insufficient.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 15A e i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For a test function , substitute and use the Taylor expansion . Oddness removes the first term, while the Gaussian integral gives . HenceTherefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 304 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Assume and take . The free Gaussian integral gives , and the normalized free Gaussian measure has covariance . Expanding only the interaction exponential gives the asymptotic expansionIn this zero-dimensional scalar field theory, the path integral has become an ordinary integral, but its combinatorics are precisely those of sextic scalar field theory.
The free generating functional is . Differentiating it proves Wick theorem: odd moments vanish, while each even moment is the sum over pairings of its factors. Each Wick contraction contributes , soThus the Feynman rules are a quantum field theory propagator for each internal line and a factor for each six-valent interaction vertex. The factorials and remove vertex and half-edge labels; the remaining weight is , where is the Feynman-diagram symmetry factor, the order of the automorphism group of the resulting diagram, including its half-edge symmetries. A tadpole diagram has an additional interchange symmetry of the two ends of its loop.
There is one empty Vacuum Feynman diagram, contributing . At one interaction vertex, the six half-edges form three loops. Its Feynman-diagram symmetry factor is , so its contribution is .
At two interaction vertices let count the lines joining them. Each interaction vertex has self-loops, so can only be . These four possibilities exhaust all Vacuum Feynman diagrams at this order. Their Feynman-diagram symmetry factors areHere the leading exchanges the two interaction vertices, permutes the joining lines, and the remaining factors permute and reverse the self-loops. The graph is disconnected and must be included in ; only a connected generating functional would discard it.
All Vacuum Feynman diagrams with at most two interaction vertices
. The empty diagram, the one-interaction vertex diagram, and the four two-interaction vertex diagrams, with their Feynman-diagram symmetry factors.This is an asymptotic expansion, rather than a convergent perturbation series: the coefficient of contains and grows too rapidly for a nonzero radius of convergence. For any fixed truncation order, the Taylor expansion remainder bound for on , followed by the finite Gaussian moment integral, proves the stated remainder estimate. For negative real the original integral diverges.


