Past exam of the condensed matter physics course of the University of Oxford 2022 4 b i Solution 2026-10-25
In weak magnetic field and the regime of paramagnetism, localized magnetic moments with total angular momentum and Landé g-factor have SI volume magnetic susceptibilitywithin the Curie–Weiss law. Here counts magnetic ions per volume, is the vacuum permeability, is the Bohr magneton, and is the Weiss temperature. The factor is the zero-field average of the squared angular projection over .
For one magnetic ion per formula unit, a molar volume contains magnetic ions, where is the Avogadro constant. Consequently , and the molar magnetic susceptibility isDefining the dimensionless effective paramagnetic moment by , numerical substitution givesThe normalization is per mole of formula units, which here also means per mole of magnetic ions.
Past exam of the condensed matter physics course of the University of Oxford 2022 4 d ii Solution 2026-10-25
With , the measured effective paramagnetic moment gives the Landé g-factorFor the free-ion Hund's rules values , , , the stated formula yieldsThusThe source fit is consistent with the unquenched orbital magnetic moment of the free praseodymium ion, within graphical accuracy. Small deviations need not indicate a change of electron configuration: crystal field splitting, interactions and the fit range can affect a measured magnetic susceptibility.
The separate proton and neutron shell capacities are . Filled shells and paired particles have zero net spin and magnetic dipole moment. The single-particle nuclear magnetic moment is , with orbital factors , and .
For nitrogen, the eight neutrons form a closed shell. The seventh proton occupies , so , and the Landé g-factor givesHence the nuclear shell model predictsIts single-particle spin and parity is . The negative moment results from the proton spin being predominantly opposed to the total angular momentum in this level.
For oxygen, eight protons and the first eight neutrons are paired. The ninth neutron occupies , with , . Since its orbital factor is zero, . ThereforeThese are ideal single-particle predictions in units of the nuclear magneton, not fits incorporating nuclear configuration mixing.
In the weak-field Zeeman effect, spin-orbit coupling keeps good and a level shifts by . At fields large compared with fine-structure coupling but still within the linear electronic Zeeman approximation, and decouple: the Paschen-Back effect gives shifts . Electric-dipole transitions obey , in that limit, recovering an orbital triplet pattern. Intermediate fields mix the coupled states.
For the weak-field sodium D-line Zeeman pattern, the given Landé g-factor formula givesAllowed photon shifts are with . ThusThese are the four- and six-component patterns. Both and components are represented, so an observation strictly along the field, which removes emission, would not show this complete pattern. Hyperfine structure is neglected.
Calculated sodium Zeeman shifts
. Original stick positions calculated from selection rules and Landé factors, in units of magnetic energy. Equal plotted stick heights are illustrative and do not assert equal transition intensities. No source spectral figure is copied. Details.To determine the magnetic field from a Zeeman diagram, the unsplit separation provides its energy scale:The smallest adjacent split spacing is approximately of that separation in the sketch. ThereforeThis is a graphical estimate; the drawing does not warrant high precision. Its splitting energy is small compared with , consistent with the weak-field approximation.
For Doppler resolution of a Zeeman pattern, thermal velocities give Gaussian Doppler broadening with widthAt , the photon-energy FWHM near is . Equating the smallest adjacent Zeeman spacing to this width gives for loss of individually resolved components. There is no sharp Gaussian resolution threshold; using whole-pattern width instead gives a smaller field of order – for complete disappearance into a single envelope. Instrumental and collisional broadening would also affect the estimate.
In the regime of weak-field Zeeman splitting, remain good labels and . For the 393.4 nm line, in and in . The Landé g-factors are and . Apply to the four upper and two lower sublevels. The allowed pairs areTheir frequency displacements in units of are respectively , so none coincide. Looking perpendicular to the field permits both the radiation from transitions and the radiation from transitions. ConsequentlyA linear polarizer parallel to the field isolates the two components; a transverse polarizer selects the four components. Without polarization selection both sets are present. This count assumes a field small compared with fine structure coupling and neglects isotope-dependent hyperfine structure; the strong-field Paschen-Back effect or a resolved nonzero-spin isotope would require a different model. The spectral spacings are unnecessary for the count, but the distinct shifts verify that counting allowed transitions does not inadvertently count degenerate lines twice.
A doublet has moment projections . The requested normalization assumes , so the projections are and the two Zeeman energies are . For independent localized ions, the one-ion partition function and thermal moment areTherefore the spin-one-half paramagnetic magnetization isIt saturates at for a field strong compared with . For a different Landé g-factor, replace every moment by ; alone does not fix that factor.
For the electronic transition, neglect hyperfine structure and use weak-field LS coupling. The Landé g-factors are and , so a transition from to shifts by .
With propagation perpendicular to the magnetic field, linear polarization parallel to the field drives the electric-dipole selection rule . The two shifts are . Perpendicular linear polarization is an equal-amplitude combination of the two field-axis circular components, driving transitions with and shifts . Each geometry therefore selects a doublet, with twice the separation in the perpendicular-polarization case. Equal line heights within a pair require equal lower-state populations and an unsaturating probe; line positions do not require that extra population assumption.
Praseodymium 2026-10-24
A chemical element of atomic number 59. Its trivalent ion has a open-shell electron configuration. In LS coupling, Hund's rules select , , , the term symbol. The corresponding free-ion Landé g-factor is and its effective paramagnetic moment is .
Single-particle nuclear magnetic moment Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
In the simplest nuclear shell model of an odd-mass number nucleus, paired nucleons contribute zero total angular momentum and magnetic dipole moment. The last unpaired nucleon supplies the nuclear spin and the stretched-state moment , where is the Landé g-factor and the nuclear magneton.
Using addition of angular momentum with givesFor , this reduces to . For , it givesThe free-nucleon orbital factors are for a proton and for a neutron. Residual nuclear interactions and configuration mixing can shift measured moments away from this ideal prediction. A single hole in an otherwise closed shell has the same stretched-state moment as a particle in that shell: removing the particle leaves total and moment .
Sodium D-line Zeeman pattern 2026-10-18
Neglect hyperfine structure and use a magnetic field weak compared with the spin-orbit interaction. The sodium D doublet has transitions and . Their Landé g-factors are , and respectively. With denoting upper and lower magnetic labels, the photon shift isThe first transition has four allowed shifts ; the second has six, . The most blue-shifted component of the second is , with shift . The apparently larger shift is excluded by the electric-dipole selection rule. The level lies above , so in this weak-field model the component also has the shortest wavelength of the whole doublet. [ref]
https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Handbook/Tables/sodiumtable5.htm. NIST, Energy Levels of Neutral Sodium, ordering of the two 3p fine-structure levels
Spin-orbit g-factor ratio from two P states 2026-10-18
An original reduced model makes the cancellation explicit. Assume LS coupling, neglect nuclear spin, and write the electronic magnetic dipole moment as . For , , the projection used to derive the Landé g-factor givesThese coefficients follow by substituting or into the angular-momentum projection formula; neither level measures pure spin alone. In a weak uniform magnetic field, adjacent electronic projections have spacing when . ThereforeThe common magnetic field and Bohr magneton cancel. The ratio determines , not without further knowledge of . For , it gives . Small departures from are magnified differently from small departures of from ; the two fractional changes should not be identified.
With the stipulated inputs , and , the two electronic frequencies are and . Their ratio is approximately , and inversion recovers . These are ideal electronic lines, not historical gallium data. Nuclear spin, mixing between levels and other deviations from LS coupling require a more complete model in an actual atom.
Weak-field Zeeman splitting Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Use the leading nonrelativistic magnetic coupling for an electronic level with total angular momentum operator , and choose the axis along a uniform external magnetic field , . Write its magnetic quantum number as , so . There are possibilities from to . With Landé g-factor , the first-order shift isHere is the magnitude of the electron electric charge, its mass, the Planck constant, and the Bohr magneton. Both and are dimensionless; with measured in tesla and in joules per tesla, is in joules. The photon frequency shift is in hertz, not angular frequency; indices denote upper and lower levels. NIST states this weak-field convention and its orbital/spin assumptions explicitly.[ref]
12. Zeeman Effect. Atomic Spectroscopy - A Compendium of Basic Ideas, Notation, Data, and Formulas by William C. Martin and Wolfgang Wiese; Atomic Spectroscopy, §12, Eqs. (6)–(8): magnetic-sublevel shift, tesla convention and magnetic splitting factor
The sign follows directly from magnetic dipole potential energy. Within this electronic multiplet, the projected magnetic dipole moment is . Therefore has the displayed positive coefficient. Subtracting the shifts of the two levels and using photon energy gives the transition formula. For the orbital case, gives the same leading frequency spacing as the classical charged oscillator. This explains the historical sensitivity to charge divided by mass; the quantum state derivation here is modern.
“Weak” compares interaction energies: mixing with neighbouring fine structure levels must be small, so remains a useful quantum number. The formula keeps the term linear in and neglects quadratic shifts. It also omits hyperfine structure; if that is resolved and controls the coupling, the appropriate total electronic-plus-nuclear angular momentum and splitting factor must replace . Weak compared with fine structure does not automatically mean weak compared with hyperfine structure.
Zeeman populations from an unpolarized angular-momentum multiplet Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-24
An equal incoherent mixture within a fixed total- multiplet has density operator , where is its orthogonal projection. If the applied-field Hamiltonian operator is proportional to and no spin-orbit interaction is retained, its energy eigenstates are the uncoupled states . The Born rule gives their populations by the formula above, or equivalently by squared Clebsch-Gordan decomposition coefficients. Equal populations of coupled states need not give equal populations of magnetic energy eigenvalues.
For , the nonextremal coupled states have weights and in their two uncoupled components. The five dimensionless magnetic energies then have populations ; the zero energy contains two independent states, each with population . In a different, weak-field approximation with a dominant spin-orbit interaction, projecting into the isolated multiplet gives the Landé g-factor spectrum instead. The full operator and its projection must not be interchanged.
Zeeman shift Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-11-05
The change of an energy level in a magnetic field. The displayed weak-field form applies to a hyperfine level with magnetic projection , when is the corresponding Landé g-factor. A transition frequency shift is the difference of the two level shifts divided by Planck constant. A clock transition can have zero first-order transition shift even when its two individual level slopes are nonzero. For hyperfine levels, the linear level shift vanishes and quadratic terms remain.
Zeeman spectrum for orbital angular momentum one Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For orbital angular momentum and spin , considerThe quantum number is conserved. The stretched states with have energies . The remaining eigenvalues follow from two blocks with off-diagonal entries :The subscripts denote . For , the zero-field multiplets are at and at . Their weak-field Zeeman splitting is , with Landé g-factors and , respectively. When , the Paschen-Back effect gives approximate product states and energies . Mixing within a fixed causes an avoided crossing; different sectors can cross because the Hamiltonian does not couple them.
