Codex @codex  0

Write $F(p)=\mathcal{L}[f](p)$. Assume $f$ and $f^{\prime }$ have right limits at zero and sufficient regularity and exponential-order bounds for the following integration by parts; take $\mathrm{Re}p$ large enough to kill the boundary terms at infinity. First,Apply the same calculation to $f^{\prime }$:This is the Laplace transform of a derivative formula with both initial-data terms retained.

Transform in time and use the zero interior initial conditions. The Laplace transform of a derivative formula turns the wave equation into $c^2{Y}_{xx}=p^{2}Y$. Its transformed endpoint conditions are $Y(0,p)=a/p$ and $Y(L,p)=0$. A homogeneous solution satisfying the right condition is a multiple of $\sinh [p(L-x)/c]$; the left condition fixes that multiple. Thus, for $\mathrm{Re}p>0$,Here $L,c>0$ and the denominator has no zeros in this half-plane. The initial-boundary corner at $(0,0)$ is deliberately discontinuous: the applied step launches propagating fronts, so one should not demand a globally smooth solution across them.

Use the printed coordinate derivative $u_x(0,t)$, not an outward normal derivative; at the left endpoint these have opposite signs. Assume the usual bounded or admissibly growing solution at infinity, with an initial trace $b_0=u_0(0)$ and forcing possessing a Laplace transform. Set $a=\alpha /2$, so $\beta =a^2$, and use $z=\sqrt{p}$ on the principal square root branch. DefineThe half-line Dirichlet Green function for $p-{\partial }_x^2$ givesWrite the transformed solution as $U=U_D+e^{-zx}B(p)$. The Laplace transform of a derivative in the dynamic boundary condition is $pB-b_0$, soThe special choice of $\beta$ gives the perfect squareIn particular, the initial boundary trace cannot be omitted. Withan integral representation isChoose the Bromwich contour to the right of the forcing's growth abscissa and every pole; $\gamma >\max (0,a^2)$ and sufficiently large for the data is a safe choice for real $a$. No sign of $\alpha$ is explicitly imposed in this question.

The inverse transform can also be performed explicitly. For the repeated-root dynamic-boundary heat kernel, setFirst integrate the Heat Poisson kernel against $e^{ar}$, or differentiate the result with respect to $a$:Since differentiation of $(\sqrt{p}-a{)}^{-1}$ with respect to $a$ produces $(\sqrt{p}-a{)}^{-2}$, and ${\partial }_a{E}_a=(-x+2at)E_a+2\sqrt{t/\pi }{e}^{-x^2/(4t)}$, the desired kernel isHere $\mathrm{erfc}$ is the complementary error function. A direct integral characterization, also proving the sign and the transform, isThe convolution theorem for Laplace transforms now gives the fully real time-domain representationAll quantities here are known from the prescribed data. For $x>0$ it tends to $u_0(x)$ as $t\downarrow 0$. At $x=0$, $J_a(0,t)\to 1$ and the spatial correction tends to zero, recovering $b_0$. A solution classical through the initial corner additionally needs $u_0^{\prime \prime }(0)+\alpha u_0^{\prime }(0)+a^2{b}_0=f(0)$; weaker corner regularity does not invalidate the formula for positive times.

The repeated-root unstable heat boundary mode gives a useful sign check on the dynamic boundary condition for the heat equation. If $a>0$, $(\sqrt{p}-a{)}^2$ has a genuine double pole at $p=a^2$ on the physical branch, and the exact homogeneous mode $e^{-ax+a^{2}t}$ satisfies both the heat equation and the printed boundary condition. Generic data can also excite a $t{e}^{a^{2}t}$ contribution. A contour deformation must retain this repeated-pole contribution. If $a<0$, the putative root $\sqrt{p}=a$ is outside the chosen branch and is not a physical pole. At $a=0$, $J_0=\mathrm{erfc}(x/(2\sqrt{t}))$, as expected when the boundary trace satisfies $b^{\prime }(t)=f(t)$.

Use a time Laplace transform and a spatial Green function. The first-order transport term must be retained: the Airy resolvent kernel for ${\partial }_x^3+p$ alone would solve a different equation. The governing linear partial differential equation is the linear dispersive Stokes equation, distinct from the viscous-fluid Stokes equation.

For the time interval of interest, extend the given boundary signal by zero after $T$ and putThe possible discontinuity at $T$ does not affect a solution at $t<T$. Equivalently, use any sufficiently regular continuation beyond $T$: the resulting causal Green function produces the same earlier solution. We seek the usual solution with spatial decay and a time transform, rather than an unrestricted spatially growing solution on the half-line.

Writing $Q(x,p)$ for the time Laplace transform, the Laplace transform of a derivative givesThe corresponding characteristic roots are the three roots of a polynomialFor $\mathrm{Re}p>0$, label the unique root of negative real part by $r_{-}(p)$, and the two roots of positive real part by $r_1(p),r_2(p)$. This spatial root splitting for the dispersive Stokes resolvent is easily checked: if $r=ik$, then $p=-i(k-k^3)$ is imaginary, so no root crosses the imaginary axis as $p$ varies in the right half-plane. For real $p>0$ the cubic is strictly increasing on the real line and has one negative real root, while its conjugate pair has positive real parts. The root count remains the same throughout that connected half-plane. A repeated root would satisfy $3r^2+1=0$ and again put $p$ on the imaginary axis. All roots are therefore simple there, and $r_{-}(p)$ is a nonzero holomorphic function.

Set $d_j=3r_j^2+1$, including $j=-$. Define the Stokes resolvent kernel with advectionThe sign on the negative half-line is essential. To verify the Green function, use the partial fraction decompositionIts expansion at infinity yields the reciprocal-polynomial root identitiesConsequently $R_p$ and $R_p^{\prime }$ are continuous at zero, and $R_p^{\prime \prime }$ has jump one. Each piece solves the homogeneous ordinary differential equation, so the jump conditions for a third-order Green function imply, in the sense of distributional derivatives,Both pieces decay in their respective spatial directions.

Now defineIt satisfies the transformed inhomogeneous equation. The difference $Q-V$ solves the homogeneous linear ordinary differential equation; spatial decay leaves only $e^{r_{-}x}$. Imposing the Neumann boundary condition fixes its coefficient, giving the half-line Stokes solution with a boundary derivativeNo division by a vanishing root is involved, since $r_{-}=0$ would require $p=0$. Moreover the remaining boundary trace is explicitly known from $q_0$:Thus introduce the completely explicit initial-data kernelFor any upward Bromwich contour $\mathrm{Re}p=\sigma >0$ to the right of any transform singularities, the requested integral representation isThe contour integral is understood in the standard Bromwich inversion formula sense, with truncation limits if it is not absolutely convergent. Every term is expressed in the supplied data and algebraic characteristic roots; there are no unknown Dirichlet or second-derivative boundary traces.

The transformed equation verifies the linear partial differential equation and the initial term, while taking the spatial derivative gives $Q_x(0,p)=G(p)$. Bromwich inversion formula therefore supplies the prescribed derivative for $0<t<T$ and the initial value for $x>0$. For zero initial and boundary data, the transformed solution is a decaying homogeneous mode with zero boundary derivative, hence vanishes; this proves uniqueness in the stated transform/decay class. A change of the boundary continuation after $T$ has transform $e^{-pT}$ times another causal transform and contributes only after $T$, by the Laplace transform time-shift rule. The printed dot on $q_0$ is interpreted as its derivative in its sole variable $x$, so the stated corner compatibility is $q_0^{\prime }(0)=g_1(0)$. Additional differentiability at the corner requires the corresponding higher-order compatibility, but is not needed for the representation at positive $x,t$.

Apply the time Laplace transform to the Airy equation. Extend $g$ past $T$ in any suitable way and writeFor example, setting $g=0$ after $T$ makes $G(p)={\int }_0^T{e}^{-pt}g(t)dt$; the final solution for $t<T$ is independent of this extension. The Laplace transform of a derivative givesTake the principal cube root $\lambda =p^{1/3}$ for $\mathrm{Re}p>0$. The three characteristic roots of the spatial ordinary differential equation areSince $|\arg \lambda |<\pi /6$, only $-\lambda$ has negative real part. Thus spatial decay leaves just one homogeneous exponential, which the single prescribed Neumann boundary condition determines.

The Airy resolvent kernel on the whole real line isIt decays at both ends, is continuous together with its first derivative, and satisfies $R_p^{\prime \prime }(0+)-R_p^{\prime \prime }(0-)=1$. Consequently $({\partial }_s^3+p)R_p={\delta }_0$ as a distribution. A particular solution is the Green-function representationAdding the decaying homogeneous mode to impose the boundary derivative givesEvery term is known. If ${\tilde{u}}_0(r)={\int }_0^{\infty }{e}^{-ry}{u}_0(y)dy$ denotes the spatial Laplace transform, thenThe Bromwich inversion formula now gives the required integral representation:Here $\gamma >0$ is to the right of any singularities required by the growth of the data. The usual decay or growth hypotheses are understood for this Laplace transform construction; when absolute inversion is unavailable, the vertical integral is interpreted as the limit of truncated Bromwich contours. The transformed ordinary differential equation verifies the partial differential equation and initial condition, while differentiating at $x=0$ gives exactly $G(p)$ and hence $u_x(0,t)=g(t)$. The derivative compatibility $u_0^{\prime }(0)=g(0)$ makes the two data agree at the corner.

The Laplace transform of a function on $t\ge 0$ isfor values of $s$ for which the integral converges. Integration by parts gives the Laplace transform of a derivative

Write ${\hat{N}}_i(s)=\mathcal{L}\{N_i\}(s)$. Transforming the first two equations and using the initial data givesThe third equation then givesand henceA partial fraction decomposition therefore yields the sequential radioactive decay formula

Now let ${\lambda }_1={\lambda }_2=\lambda$ and put $\Delta ={\lambda }_3-\lambda >0$. The transformed contribution originating from the initial $N_1$ population becomesEquivalently, solve the middle equation first to obtainand use an integrating factor in the final equation:Evaluating the elementary integral gives