If the negative minimum m=minξu0′(ξ) is attained, the first breaking time is t∗=−1/m. Two labels ξ1<ξ2 with u0(ξ1)>u0(ξ2) have formal intersection time
For a concrete calculation in dimensionless quantities on the infinite line, choose u0(ξ)=1−tanhξ, with limiting states 2 and 0. Then u0′(ξ)=−(1−tanh2ξ) has minimum −1 at ξ=0, so t∗=1 and the breaking point is (x,t)=(1,1). Along the central characteristic curvex=t, u=1 and ux=−1/(1−t) before breaking. The labels ξ=±1 give intersecting formal lines at t=1/tanh1≈1.313, after the classical solution has already broken.
For Noncharacteristic Cauchy data parameterized by t≥0, the method of characteristics produces asurface Φ(s,t)=(x,y,z). The part uniquely fixed asa classical graph through the data must retain both the allowed footpoint range and a nonsingular branch of the projected map. On a branch where inversion gives (s(x,y),t(x,y)), require t(x,y)≥0, together with the branch condition and a nonzero Jacobian determinant. The strict inequality t>0 describes its open interior; the endpoint characteristic t=0 supplies a boundary trace. A fold caustic can supply another boundary.
An algebraic formula obtained by eliminating s,t can extend beyond this domain of dependence. Its values there need not be selected by the original data, because their characteristic footpoints can lie on the unprescribed half of the datacurve. Tracking the parameter range is therefore part of the uniqueness argument, separately from selecting a real square-root branch.
The derivativeuy=cosη/(1+xcosη) becomes singular when that projection first degenerates, although u itself stays finite. At x=1 the degenerate labels are odd multiples of π, and at x=−1 they are even multiples. At either boundary the limiting map remains strictly increasing, with isolated zero derivatives, so fixed image values determine convergent labels. Consequently the gradient diverges at fixed y=(2k+1)π+7/6as x↑1, and at fixed y=2kπ−7/6as x↓−1, using k≥0 and k≥1, respectively, to stay in the half-line initial domain. At these firstsingularities yηη=0 and yηηη=0; this is the onset of loss of invertibility, rather than an ordinary nondegenerate fold at the initial singular time.
For the inhomogeneous equation 2yux−xuy=xy(2y2−x2), a particular solution is up=x2y2/2, so the general solution is u=x2y2/2+F(x2+2y2). Prescribing u(x,1)=x2 fixes F(s)=(s−2)/2 only for s≥2. The inner ellipsess<2 never intersect that data line, so the boundary values leave their solution values undetermined. Smooth extensions must match the prescribed F at s=2; choosing the same linear formula everywhere gives one polynomial extension.
For Ht+Hn+1Hx=1−2x with H(ξ,0)=0, method of characteristics conserves Hn+2/(n+2)−(x−x2). A positive downstream branch therefore requires 0≤ξ<x<1−ξ. Initial points in the negative-accumulation region cannot create nonnegative ice from a bare bed. Characteristic intersections and missing dry-bed physics prevent using the formal initial/boundary branches as an unrestricted global solution.
The equations of the method of characteristics give (x,y,u)=(s+t2/2,t,set). Their parametermap to the plane has Jacobian determinant one, so it is globally invertible and u=(x−y2/2)ey is uniquely determined exactly where 1≤x−y2/2≤2. Both positive and negative y occur. Outside this closed parabolic strip, u=eyF(x−y2/2) allows arbitrary smooth changes of F outside the initial parameter interval. The boundary characteristic curves carry the data from its endpoints.
defined precisely when x,y have the same nonzero sign. Every such point is reached by exactly one characteristic. Hence the region of unique determination from these initial dataprojects onto
the first and third quadrants. The axes are not reached for finite parameter from s=0, and the other two quadrants have no method of characteristics issued from this initial curve.
Asa direct check, substitution of the inverse parameters gives the solution
This is the domain determined by a finite segment under a radial characteristic flow. Its interior is x<2, 0<y<2−x; the two boundary rays come from the endpoints of the initial segment. Every point there lies on exactly one characteristic from the data. Outside this sector, a characteristic either misses the initial segment or lies on the branch x>2, which cannot reach it. Thus the formula may be extended beyond this sector, but such an extension is not uniquely specified by the given data.
For agraph parametrized by (x,y,u(x,y)), a normal vector is N=(−ux,−uy,1). The PDE says N⋅(a,b,c)=0, so the characteristic vector is tangent to the solution surface. Flowing a suitable initial curve along these directions constructs asurface; where its projection to the (x,y)plane has nonzero Jacobian determinant, the inverse function theorem makes it agraph. Local uniqueness of this general flow needs the usual regularity assumptions beyond mere continuity. The particular characteristic system below is smooth and can be solved explicitly.
Label the initial points by η≥0. Since dx/ds=1, take x=s. The other two equations integrate to
For each fixed ∣x∣<1, the derivative of the displayed y with respect to η is 1+xcosη≥1−∣x∣>0. It increases from its value at η=0 to infinity, so it is abijection from [0,∞) onto [yL(x),∞), where
Thus there is exactly one characteristic label, and hence one solution value, throughout the requested region, including the initial-label boundary asa trace.
For a fixed integerk≥0, let y∗=(2k+1)π+7/6. As x→1− at this fixed y∗, the label tends to (2k+1)π, giving uy→−∞. To justify the label limit, the limiting map at x=1 is strictly increasing despite isolated zero derivatives, so its inverse has a unique continuous limit. Similarly, at any fixed y∗=2kπ−7/6 with k≥1, the limit as x→−1+ has η→2kπ and uy→+∞. These fixed values lie within the region near the respective boundary, proving the requested gradient blow-up.
The square root must be positive, and t≥0 requires x+1≥1+x+y>0. Squaring is now legitimate and gives y≤x2+x. Thus the full characteristic-covered set on this branch is
Each point of D has exactly one backward characteristic meeting the interior t>0 of the prescribed data, so the Picard-Lindelöf theorem fixes its value. The upper boundary is the characteristic issuing from the endpoint t=0 and is fixed by the endpoint datum, consistently with the continuous trace from D. The lower boundary is excluded: s=−1 there, the Jacobian determinant vanishes, and the explicit solution derivatives diverge as W↓0.
Points of the half-plane W>0 outside this set have t<0 on the branch through the data. Their characteristic footpoints would lie on the unprescribed continuation of the initial line, so these values are not determined by the given half-line alone. For example, extend the initial value to negative tas 1+εh(t), where h is a smooth function supported on the negative half-line. Such extensions agree with all the prescribed data and, where noncharacteristic, produce different local extensions by the method of characteristics. The displayed formula supplies one possible extension there, but the data do not select it uniquely. This is why retaining the restriction on the initial half-line is essential. Continuing the parameterized surface past s=−1 instead produces the other sheet of the fold; it does not give a differentiable graph continuation through the caustic.
At r=0, prescribe x=x0(s), y=y0(s), u=u0(s) and choose p0,q0 satisfying both F(x0,y0,u0,p0,q0)=0 and the compatibility relation p0x0′+q0y0′=u0′. Direct differentiation gives
and the inequalities say 0<s<1 and s>x/2. The upper boundary is the caustic; the lower boundary is the characteristic curve from s=1. Endpoints of that latter boundary can be retained as one-sided data. For forward characteristic curves alone, also impose r≥0: this retains y≥0, with lower boundary zero for x≤1 and the displayed endpoint characteristic curve for 1<x<2. The other square-root branch belongs to the folded sheet after the caustic and does not provide a unique regular continuation from the initial data.
For zero viscosity, the method of characteristics gives u=u0(a)e−t and x=a+u0(a)(1−e−t). On the sloping part of the initial profile, u0(a)=−2a, so x=a(2e−t−1). While this map is increasing, inversion gives
For 0≤t<t∗ the profile consists of a left plateau, a straight descending ramp ending at zero, and a right zero plateau. At t∗ the ramp becomes a vertical jump. This is a damped Burgers equation; viscosity smooths that jump into a thin transition.
The firstbracket is zero by the prescribed initial compatibility condition, and the second is zero by differentiating F(p(s),q(s))=0. Thus us=pxs+qysas well. These calculations use the differentiability of the supplied parametric functions.
The incomplete beta function is finite at both endpoints because 0<p<1 for the physical exponents n>0. Before characteristiccrossings, the initial-data branch and boundary-data branch have the displayed forms in the source, with the appropriate emission time t−f(x) for the latter.
Glacier characteristic admissibility gives a substantive domain restriction. Factoring the invariant gives A(x)−A(ξ)=(x−ξ)(1−x−ξ). A positive forward branch requires
Equivalently it is the image of this parameter domain under (ξ,x)↦(x,t(ξ,x)), restricted further to regions where that map is single-valued. Characteristics cannot start with positive thickness growth at ξ>1/2, where the prescribed initial rate Ht=1−2ξ is negative. This is why the printed piecewise expression is a formal characteristic construction, not a global nonnegative solution from a bare bed. For example for x>1/2, putting Lξ=1−2ξ gives
Both factors increase with ξ there, so no positive initial-data branch exists at that x for 0<t<f(x), contrary to a literal global reading of the first case. Compression can also make characteristics intersect; entropy solutions then require shock waves.
One can nevertheless give the exact zero-thickness endpoint locus of these formal characteristics. Let K=f(1)=(n+2)−pB(q,q). At x=1−ξ the change of variable z=ξ+(1−2ξ)y gives
This is the formal snout locus inferred from the given characteristic family; it retreats from 1 towards 1/2. It is not justified as the physical terminus of an accumulating glacier formed from zero initial ice. In particular it says nothing about a positive advancing snout at t<K. A physical free boundary problem must specify no ablation on a bare bed, maintain H≥0, and select an entropy solution or retain the small sloperegularization. Those additional conditions are absent from the printed first-order construction. Thus a unique global physical snout trajectory cannot be claimed from that construction alone. The steady endpoint remains x=1. The degenerate n=0 limit would instead have the same endpoint time K for every initial characteristic, so the inverted formula presumes n>0.
Let L=x∂x−2y∂y. Choose u=α(x)y to be an invariant of the method of characteristics. Then Lu=y{xα′(x)−2α(x)}, so xα′=2α and a convenient choice is α(x)=x2. For v=y/x, the chain rule gives Lv=−3v. Thus, writing the unknown in the new coordinates,
For a patch crossing x=0 with y=0, the characteristic invariant w=x∣y∣ instead gives f=∣y∣−3K(w), with an arbitrary differentiable function on each sign component of y. These chartdescriptions must agree on overlaps. On the axes the original equation gives f(x,0)=C±x6 and f(0,y)=D±∣y∣−3 on their separate components; a solution defined smoothly through the origin must have f(0,0)=0 and compatible smooth limits, in particular D±=0. No boundary data select a particular arbitrary function.
The map from the initial label loses invertibility when 1−f′(ξ)ζ=0. For smooth data with bounded derivative and M=supf′>0, the first forward characteristic crossing is at ζs=1/M; if M≤0, no forward shock occurs.
For spherical spreading, write physical radiusas R>0 and specify data at an emitting radius R0>0. Since A(R)=R2,
No finite shock distance exists in this model when M≤0.
The printed combination A=Z2 with general bounded data at Z=0 is singular and does not define the intended outgoing spherical initial-value problem. Along a spherical characteristic, dθ/dR=−q and dq/dR=−q/R, so Rq is constant. A bounded trace at R=0forces that constant to be zero for every characteristic curve emanating from the origin; arbitrary nonzero bounded f cannot be launched there. For example, the ostensibly admissible data f≡1 would demand both Rq=0 and a nonzero trace, acontradiction. The logarithmic transformed distance is also divergent at the origin. Thus an unqualified numerical shock formula from those literal data would be unjustified. The finite-radiusformulas above give the physical interpretation once the launching radius, or the shifted arealaw, is supplied.