An inverse system of topological spaces over a directed set consists of spaces and continuous maps for , with and . Its inverse limit is a space with compatible continuous projections such that every compatible family of continuous maps factors uniquely through a continuous map . To construct it, take
with the subspace topology inherited from the product topology. The map has values in and is continuous by the definition of the product topology; its coordinates force uniqueness. If is another inverse limit, the two universal properties give continuous maps and whose composites have all the same projections as the identity. Uniqueness makes these composites the identity. The inverse limit exists and is unique up to a unique projection-preserving homeomorphism. An arbitrary inverse limit may be empty; nonemptiness requires additional hypotheses.
Use the usual Hausdorff convention for a topological group. An inverse limit of finite discrete groups is a closed subgroup of their product: each compatibility condition is closed because the finite factors are Hausdorff spaces. The Tychonoff theorem gives compactness, and distinct tuples are separated by a clopen coordinate cylinder, so the limit is totally disconnected. Coordinatewise multiplication and inversion are continuous, giving a profinite group.
Conversely, let be a compact Hausdorff space and a totally disconnected topological group. We use the standard topological fact that a compact Hausdorff space that is totally disconnected has a basis of clopen sets. Given an identity neighbourhood, choose a clopen identity neighbourhood inside it. Compactness of and continuity of multiplication give a symmetric identity neighbourhood with : cover by finitely many neighbourhoods on which multiplication by a sufficiently small identity neighbourhood stays inside , then intersect those identity neighbourhoods. Symmetry gives for . Consequently is a subgroup containing , hence an open subgroup, and since . Its open cosets cover the compact group, so there are finitely many. The normal core is a finite intersection of open subgroups, hence an open normal subgroup contained in . Thus the open normal subgroups form an identity-neighbourhood basis and have trivial intersection.
The canonical group homomorphism is continuous and injective. For a compatible tuple of quotient elements, its inverse-image cosets in are closed and have the finite intersection property: a finite family is refined by the quotient for the intersection of its normal subgroups. Compactness gives an element in all those cosets, proving surjectivity. A continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism. The compact totally disconnected and inverse-limit definitions of a profinite group agree.
Index the finite nonempty sets by open normal subgroups, with the transition from to when given by image under . Images of Sylow subgroups under surjections of finite groups are Sylow subgroups. These transitions are surjective: if is a Sylow subgroup, choose a Sylow subgroup in its full inverse image in . It maps onto , and its order has the full -part of , so it is a Sylow subgroup of too. The transitions respect composition, giving an inverse system of finite sets.
Its inverse limit is nonempty. Indeed, finitely many compatibility conditions can be satisfied by choosing one Sylow subgroup in a quotient refining all the involved quotients and taking its images; compactness of the product of the finite sets then gives a compatible family . Define
This is a closed subgroup of . Its image in is exactly : for a prescribed , each finite collection of conditions defining together with is satisfiable in a common refining quotient, because the transitions on the chosen Sylow subgroups are surjective. The finite intersection property again supplies . Hence is a pro-p group and for every .
Finally, if a pro-p subgroup contains , its image in every finite quotient is a p-group containing the Sylow subgroup , so that image equals . Thus every belongs to every , whence . The constructed is a maximal pro-p subgroup.
A topological group is a group with a topology for which and are continuous; we use the Hausdorff convention. Translations and inversion are then homeomorphisms.
For the final generator-extraction assertion, use the profinite Frattini subgroup
For a finitely generated pro-p group, the Burnside basis theorem says that is a finite-dimensional vector space over and a subset topologically generates precisely when its image spans that vector space. In particular its dimension is the minimal number of topological generators. A given -element generating set shows . The image of any other generating set spans the same finite-dimensional vector space, so it contains a basis of elements. Choose their preimages in that generating set and apply the Burnside basis theorem again. Every generating set contains a generating subset of size . This argument also applies to an infinite generating set.
If is an open subgroup, each left coset is open because translation is a homeomorphism. Its complement is the union of the other cosets, hence is open. Every open subgroup is closed. No compactness is needed.
Let and let be an open neighbourhood of . Continuity of supplies neighbourhoods of and of with . Choose and . Then , so . The subgroup criterion using proves the closure of a subgroup is a subgroup. The neighbourhood argument avoids assuming the topology is determined by sequences.
For an open subgroup of a profinite group , the open left cosets form a disjoint cover of a compact space. A finite subcover must include every coset, so is finite. Choose representatives for these cosets. The normal core is
Each conjugate is open, and the intersection is finite, so is an open normal subgroup contained in . and contains an open normal subgroup of .
Choose a finite set of topological generators of and let denote the abstract subgroup it generates. Then is dense in . For an open subgroup , the abstract subgroup is dense in , since every nonempty open subset of is open in . Every coset of meets , so .
Here is the needed Schreier lemma argument explicitly. Choose representatives in for the right cosets , including for , and write for the representative of . The finite set
is contained in . For , set , with . Then
and every factor belongs to the displayed finite set. Thus is finitely generated as an abstract group. Its finite generators topologically generate its closure . Every open subgroup of a finitely generated profinite group is finitely generated.
Throughout this question is odd, means the subgroup generated by the -th powers of elements of , and the commutator of group elements convention is . A subgroup is powerfully embedded in when . In particular is normal, since . A finite p-group is a powerful p-group when .
First put . It is normal in . By the reduction permitted in the question, it suffices to prove after factoring out . In that quotient, is central. For and , put . Then is central, and the elementary identity gives, by induction,
Both and belong to , and divides because is odd. Hence . The subgroup is normal in , so the commutator identity extends this inclusion from the generating elements to every element of . Applying the allowed reduction proves is powerfully embedded in .
For , normality of gives . Its quotient by is cyclic. Modulo , the image of is central and the remaining generator is , so that quotient is abelian. Therefore
Thus is powerful.
The lower p-series is , . For the later calculations write , so . Part (i) will show and . A useful power lifting in a powerful p-group congruence is
Indeed, modulo the commutators are central, lie in and have exponent dividing . Collecting the copies of therefore gives only the correction , which is trivial. This argument also covers . The congruence is the reason roots and coordinates can be corrected one power layer at a time.
Initially is powerfully embedded in itself. If is powerfully embedded in , then and consequently . The preliminary result says that is again powerfully embedded in , completing the induction.
For a finite p-group , the Frattini subgroup is . Here , so
Since the Frattini subgroup of a nontrivial finite p-group is proper, this series eventually reaches . Thus , with iterated power subgroups, terminates.
Modulo , the subgroup is central because , and has exponent dividing because . Thus the group has nilpotency class at most two. Collection gives
since and . Also replacing by with leaves its -th power unchanged modulo . Hence the assignment is well-defined and is a group homomorphism. Its image contains all the generators of , so it is onto:
First, the images of span by the surjective group homomorphism in (ii). Part (i) identifies with , so the Burnside basis theorem gives
This proves generation by the indicated powers; it does not yet prove that an arbitrary product of powers is itself a power.
For that stronger assertion, let . Part (ii) supplies with . Suppose at some stage , where . Apply (ii) to the powerful p-group : its first two power layers are . We can therefore choose with
The preliminary power congruence gives . Replacing by improves the root by one layer. The lower p-series terminates, so finitely many corrections yield exactly. Every element of is a -th power in .
Apply (iii) successively to the powerful p-groups . Starting with , if , then
Thus
For each , the elementary abelian group is spanned by the images of . We construct exponents so that equals the ordered product to successively greater precision. Suppose this product agrees with modulo ; initially this is automatic for . Its error modulo can be expressed using the images of . Add the corresponding digits to the exponents . Since , moving each new factor past the other factors changes nothing modulo . The new ordered product therefore agrees with modulo . Termination of the lower p-series proves
No uniqueness of this factorization is asserted for a redundant generating tuple.
The printed converse is false without an additional condition. For any odd , take the Heisenberg group with
Every element is uniquely , with , so is a product of three cyclic subgroups. For strictly upper triangular, and
in characteristic , including . Therefore , whereas . This finite p-group is not powerful, disproving the literal request in the authoritative PDF.
A precise nearby correction is the minimal cyclic factorization criterion for powerful p-groups: require a product of cyclic subgroups, where is the minimal generator number. To prove it, put and . The quotient has exponent and still has minimal generator number , because . Each cyclic factor has image of order at most , so . But by the Burnside basis theorem. Consequently , is an elementary abelian group, and . A product of exactly cyclic subgroups is powerful. A direct product of cyclic groups is also powerful, since it is abelian; neither stronger hypothesis appears in the printed converse.
Put and , where powers mean closed generated subgroups. The finite-quotient arguments of Question 3 pass to a powerful pro-p group: in particular is powerfully embedded, the power map is onto , and
For the root assertion, apply the finite result to every finite quotient and use the finite intersection property on the closed sets of possible roots in the compact group. Each is finitely generated by the appropriate powers of a finite generating tuple, and is finite and elementary abelian. Thus the are open. They form an identity-neighbourhood basis: in any finite continuous quotient their images form a terminating lower p-series, so some is contained in the kernel. In particular . Collection also gives
One can see the extra index directly by induction from : collect for . Its leading factor advances one layer, and the remaining iterated commutators, with their binomial coefficients, lie at least as deep. Products and limits preserve the inclusion. This is the usual strongly central property of the lower p-series.
A uniform pro-p group is a finitely generated powerful pro-p group for which all the indices equal . The preliminary congruence gives surjective linear maps
If is uniform, these maps are bijective. If , write and choose the unique layer with . Bijectivity of and the power congruence imply , so . Thus the power map is injective. A finite-order element of a pro-p group has -power order; repeated injectivity of the power map excludes every nonidentity such element. Hence a uniform group is a torsion-free group.
Conversely, suppose some has a nonzero kernel. Choose with . At step , if the current satisfies , surjectivity of supplies with
Set . The power congruence gives . Since the corrections tend to in the complete profinite group, the converge to , with and . In particular . A torsion-free group cannot have such an element, so every is injective and all layer indices are equal. This proves the root correction criterion for uniformity and
For a uniform group the power maps are continuous bijections , hence homeomorphisms. Their inverses define the unique roots used below. Comparison at the first differing layer also proves the power congruences in a uniform pro-p group:
The intrinsic Lie algebra of a uniform pro-p group has the same underlying set as , zero equal to the group identity, and operations
Here is the limit of integral powers approaching . The first root is taken in and the second in ; the commutator actually lies in . The following faithful algebra realization verifies convergence and the Lie algebra axioms, rather than assuming them as part of the definition.
Choose a minimal tuple of topological generators. The layer isomorphisms show that the images of are bases of . The ordered-coordinate argument of Question 3 therefore gives a continuous bijection
Existence follows by successive digits and compactness; uniqueness follows by the first digit at which the coordinates differ, because its images are linearly independent in the corresponding power layer. Thus this map is a homeomorphism.
Here are details of the norm needed on the group algebra. In put . Its elements have unique ordered expansions with . To verify this description, identify the ordered coordinates of with . Elements of the completed group algebra are integral measures on this space; their values on the binomial polynomials are precisely the coefficients . The finite-difference identity pairs the ordered monomial with this binomial polynomial as . The Mahler expansion of a continuous function therefore proves both existence and uniqueness of the measure with the specified coefficients. This also proves that the ordinary rational group algebra embeds in these expansions.
Choose and set
This defines the weighted group algebra of a uniform pro-p group. Its multiplication is submultiplicative in the valuation convention, . Indeed, has valuation ; collection of ordered coordinates gives the same lower bound for when . Interchanging two adjacent in a product introduces a correction coming from , of valuation at least . Iterating the interchange rule never lowers the total weight; the corrections have strictly increasing weight, so infinite collection converges. The same argument with -th powers shows
The equality follows from the first nonzero coordinate digit: its leading terms are , at least one with unit , and cannot cancel in the ordered expansion. Completing the rational group algebra in this norm produces a complete normed algebra in which embeds faithfully and with its original topology.
Since , the series
converge on the relevant balls in and are inverse there. Their convergence follows from and ; formal one-variable identities prove that they are inverse. Put and . The Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula in now gives
because every term of degree at least two tends to zero after this rescaling. Similarly expansion of gives
The leading term is the indicated associative-algebra commutator and all terms of degree at least three tend to zero. These expressions are the logarithms of the unique roots in the intrinsic formulas. The image is compact and hence closed in , so both limits belong to , and the inverse logarithm takes the limits back to . Also . Consequently identifies the intrinsic operations with addition, scalar multiplication and commutation in . The Jacobi identity follows by expanding the associative products; thus is indeed a Lie algebra over .
The commutator roots in the intrinsic formula belong to , so their limit gives . Iterating the power congruence gives . Taking the unique roots shows that intrinsic addition modulo is the original group product modulo . Consequently is the original elementary abelian quotient , and the images of the form a basis. Successively removing digits expresses every element uniquely as an additive sum : existence uses completeness, while a nonzero relation would have a first nonzero digit contradicting the basis in . Hence is a free module of rank over the p-adic integers and is a powerful Lie lattice.
Conversely a powerful Lie algebra over p-adic integers, for odd , is a finite free -module with a bilinear alternating Lie bracket satisfying the Jacobi identity and . Define
For completeness, integrality and convergence can be verified without guessing which individual denominators are units. In set . Then , so its integral universal enveloping algebra has an ordered basis by the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem. Its coefficientwise -adic norm is submultiplicative, and consists of elements of valuation at least one. The homogeneous degree- terms in have coefficients of valuation at least : expand the logarithm, use on each nonconstant exponential factor, and on a product of such factors. Therefore evaluating degree on gives valuation at least
which tends to infinity and is at least two when . Each homogeneous term is a rational Lie polynomial by the formal Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula. The ordered enveloping-algebra basis shows that its intersection with is exactly , so the estimate places the sum in , with the non-linear part in .
Associativity follows from the identity in the completed universal enveloping algebra. Its identity is , its inverse is , and , since the bracket of with itself is zero. The same coefficient estimate for the group commutator puts it in . Conjugation in the BCH group is ; each term preserves , because each bracket adds a factor of and . Thus the submodules are normal subgroups for , their intersection is zero, and their finite quotients have -power order. Thus is a powerful pro-p group, with
A module basis topologically generates this group: it generates the quotient , and successive power digits lift that generation through all . The BCH construction therefore gives a uniform pro-p group.
In the uniform pro-p group , the -th power of is exactly , and its unique -th root in the appropriate layer is division by . The intrinsic addition is therefore
The linear term is exact; every non-linear term tends to zero by the convergence estimates above. The intrinsic Lie bracket is
since the leading term is and the terms of degree at least three vanish after rescaling. Finally the intrinsic scalar operation sends to . All underlying sets are identical, and all three operations agree. Thus
Use the faithful logarithm realization from the root Solution: identifies with the Lie algebra . For , the convergent exponential identity in gives
Every Lie polynomial and its convergent sum are preserved by this realization of . Therefore the BCH product on the underlying set of has exactly the same logarithm as the original product . Injectivity of the logarithm proves equality of the two products, with the same topology, identity and inverses:
This proves the reverse direction of the uniform pro-p group and powerful Lie lattice correspondence directly; the forward identity alone would not imply it.
The proof of the linearity of a uniform pro-p group has three distinct steps: pass to a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, integrate a faithful representation on a sufficiently small open subgroup, and extend it to the entire group. Working first on a small subgroup is essential because a faithful Lie algebra representation need not send the original integral lattice into the convergence domain of the matrix exponential.
Let be a uniform pro-p group and let be its intrinsic powerful Lie lattice. Then
is a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over a field of characteristic zero. The Ado theorem, the classical Lie-theoretic ingredient in this proof, supplies a faithful finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation
One must use a faithful representation rather than just the Adjoint representation, which annihilates the center of a Lie algebra.
Choose a p-adic lattice . Since is finitely generated as a module, the entries of the representing matrices of a module basis have bounded denominators. Hence for sufficiently large ,
For odd , the matrix exponential and p-adic logarithm converge and are inverse between and . Put ; under the uniform pro-p group and powerful Lie lattice correspondence it is the BCH group on . Define
Here denotes the inverse of the intrinsic logarithm identification, not an assumed matrix representation of . The Lie algebra homomorphism respects the convergent Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula, so
Thus is a continuous group homomorphism. If , taking the matrix logarithm gives , whence . Therefore is faithful and all its matrices preserve . This proves linearity of the open normal subgroup .
To finish, use the extension of a faithful representation from an open normal subgroup. Choose representatives of the finite left cosets , where . On the finite free module , define the action of by writing uniquely
and mapping the -th block to the -th block by . If and , then ; this proves the representation identity because . Each block matrix is invertible over , and the map is continuous because the finite coset permutation is locally constant and the remaining matrix entries are obtained continuously from .
If , its permutation of moves the identity coset, so its block representation is not the identity. If and its block representation is the identity, the block corresponding to is , and faithfulness of gives . Thus this induced representation is faithful. Choosing a basis of proves
The continuous injection is a topological embedding, since is compact and the target is Hausdorff. The trivial group is immediate. For uniform groups at , the same proof uses the usual stronger powerfulness condition and the convergence ball instead; the preceding questions concern odd .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.