Planetary motion 2026-10-24
The motion of a planet. A mathematical treatment distinguishes a two-body orbit from perturbations caused by additional bodies.
Planetary scientist 2026-10-25
A researcher studying the composition, structure, formation or evolution of planets and other planetary bodies.
Planetary thermal mass 2026-10-20
The scale makes the Bondi radius comparable with the disk scale height. It organizes when planet-induced disturbances become nonlinear; it is not identical to an exact universal gap-opening mass.
In units where a circular planet has orbital radius and speed one, the particle's relative speed outside a close encounter satisfies , to leading order in the planet-to-star mass ratio. This follows from the vis-viva equation and at the encounter radius. A short conservative encounter changes the direction of this relative velocity while preserving its magnitude.
An inclined inner planet causes exterior debris disk rings to undergo nodal precession at different rates. In the quadrupole approximation, . Rings that have precessed appreciably tilt away from their original orbital plane, whereas distant rings remain near it, making an evolving warp. Conservative secular perturbations alone do not damp every ring into the planet's plane; unresolved phase mixing can instead produce a thick inner disk whose mean normal is near the forced plane.
Planet trap 2026-10-20
A location where the net disk torque on a planet vanishes and, for a stable trap, restoring torque changes sign across the location. A torque zero alone does not guarantee stable trapping as the disk or planet evolves.
Pluto 2026-10-25
A dwarf planet in the outer Solar System. Its slow rotation and finite atmosphere make it an illustrative setting for comparing planetary vorticity gradients, linear drag and basin geometry in simplified circulation models.
If otherwise comparable isolated planets of one mass follow , their intrinsic luminosity ratio is . The normalization depends on composition and initial entropy. Strong stellar irradiation, deep heating, or accretion can invalidate extrapolating the same cooling law.
Poynting–Robertson decay of a circumplanetary orbit Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
Consider a circular circumplanetary orbit well inside the Hill sphere, with dust speed and unit plane normal . During one dust orbital period, take the stellar direction and flux at the planet's stellar radius as constant. The velocity-dependent Poynting–Robertson drag has relative work
The constant terms have zero work over the closed circular orbit. Since ,
The coefficient is three for coplanar stellar and dust orbits; it is two for a dust plane normal to the instantaneous stellar direction. Averaging over a circular planetary year at fixed dust orbital inclination gives . Conservative perturbations must remain small enough for this circular-orbit average.
The leading uniform stellar radiation pressure is a differential acceleration relative to a planet, of scale . Relative to planetocentric gravity at dust radius , its magnitude is
Thus lying inside a Hill sphere alone does not guarantee small radiative perturbations. Approximately circular tightly bound dust requires this ratio sufficiently small, as well as weak tides; the uniform radiative force can otherwise excite orbital eccentricity or unbind grains.
Safronov number 2026-10-06
For a planet on a circular stellar orbit, a common convention is . The escape-to-orbital-speed ratio measures the size of a strong gravitational assist relative to the stellar binding energy of a nearby comet. Large values tend to favour ejection over collision; small values favour repeated weak encounters with more collision opportunities. This is a statistical comparison, dependent on the initial orbit and encounter geometry, rather than a universal outcome threshold.
For a test particle interior to a distant eccentric planet, write . The leading Laplace coefficients are and . Thus its forced eccentricity is and its secular frequency is . More distant inner particles have larger forced orbital eccentricities and faster secular precession, producing a growing gradient of complex eccentricity.
A planet can block stellar radiation during part of a circumplanetary orbit. Then the full-orbit constant-flux averages for radiation pressure and Poynting–Robertson drag require modification. The detailed shadow duty cycle depends on the orbital inclination, stellar angular extent and dust radius.
For a particle initially having semimajor axis one and encountering a circular planet at radius one, the incoming stellar-frame speed is one. A conservative encounter at planet-relative speed changes the stellar-frame velocity by at most . Since stellar escape requires speed , a necessary bound is . Retaining the outgoing relative-velocity geometry sharpens the necessary bound to . Neither inequality by itself guarantees a realizable deflection at a specified impact parameter.
A dark, opaque circular planet of radius blocks specific intensity over its overlap with the projected star. With and no transit dilution, the instantaneous exoplanet transit depth is exactly
When , the entire planetary disk is inside the stellar disk, and specific intensity varies little across that disk, small-planet transit weighting reduces to
Here is the projected centre separation divided by . The numerator samples the local specific intensity; the denominator normalizes by the whole star's mean specific intensity. The small-size argument and the distinction between full overlap and ingress are explicit in the original analytic treatment. [ref]
For a short approximately straight crossing at constant transverse velocity , write with at mid-transit, and let be the transit impact parameter. Then and . With stipulated and , a central crossing has mid-transit exoplanet transit depth approximately , whereas gives . A uniform disk would give for either fully overlapping crossing. The brighter central chord produces a deeper dip and the off-centre chord a shorter crossing at the same .
Figure 1.
Two transit chords across the same synthetic limb-darkened disk flux distribution
. Stipulated and ; the coloured curves integrate the occulted specific intensity over the finite planetary disk, including ingress and egress. Dashed curves show small-planet transit weighting only where the whole planetary disk is inside the star. Horizontal dotted segments give the uniform-disk full-overlap depth . The chord panel shows mid-transit positions; the horizontal coordinate in the light curve is distance travelled divided by stellar radius, equivalent to scaled time at constant transverse velocity. Details.
At fixed away from the edge, a two-dimensional Taylor's theorem expansion over the symmetric planetary disk cancels the first derivatives; the first correction to the blocked radiant flux is of order if the second derivatives remain bounded. This error estimate is not uniform at the edge, where the radial derivative of the linear limb-darkening law diverges. Ingress, egress, a grazing exoplanet transit, and a crossing of a starspot require the overlap integral or a suitable more complete model. Inferring without the local-to-mean specific intensity ratio can bias the estimated planet radius.
Starspot 2026-10-14
A starspot is a relatively cool, dark region on a star's surface associated with a magnetic field. Starspots change the light curve as the star rotates. A planet crossing a starspot blocks less light than it would from an unspotted region, producing a local upward anomaly during an exoplanet transit; unocculted starspots can instead deepen the normalized exoplanet transit depth. They can also distort spectral lines and imitate a Doppler spectroscopy signal.
At fixed observed period and semi-amplitude, and . At fixed planet mass and amplitude threshold, the largest circular orbit instead scales as . A revised stellar radius affects transit-derived planet radii but not these leading dynamical relations.
Tisserand periapsis bound 2026-10-07
For bound planet-crossing Kepler orbits, , with the planet radius taken as one. At fixed , is maximized by and . For this gives . This form remains regular at . It is an invariant-based accessibility bound, not a guarantee that a scattering history attains it; for it gives no positive universal pericentre floor.
The first-to-fourth-contact duration of an exoplanet transit by a spherical opaque planet of radius ratio on a circular orbit. The transit impact parameter is . The formula includes finite planet size and orbital curvature; it reduces to the transit duration of a small planet when and . It describes contact geometry, not a uniquely specified light-curve threshold in the presence of limb darkening.
For a small planet on a nearly circular Kepler orbit, a stellar chord at normalized transit impact parameter has length . Dividing by transverse orbital speed gives the duration. A central transit has the longest duration within this approximation. Eliminating with Kepler's third law yields for known mean stellar mass density. Finite planet radius, appreciable orbital eccentricity, and corrections change the bound.