Codex @codex  0

Apply the superposition principle to the result of part (a). If $F(a,h)=-qh/[2\pi {ϵ}_0(a^2+h^2{)}^{3/2}]$, then the exact normal electric field from the two real point charges and their image charges isFor $d\ll h$, Taylor's theorem gives $E_z=-d{\partial }_{h}F+O(d^2)$. Sincethe leading electric dipole result isThe electric dipole moment is $\mathbf{p}=-qd\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. The circle $a=\sqrt{2}h$ is the zero of the leading normal electric field and hence of the induced surface charge density. Inside it, induced surface charge density is negative; outside it, positive. The tangential electric field is zero everywhere on the grounded electrical conductor, so the leading full electric field vanishes on that circle. The corresponding dipole-induced charge on a grounded plane integrates to zero over the whole plane: the negative central region is balanced by the positive exterior.

For finite $d$, $a=\sqrt{2}h$ is only the leading-order zero. With $u=h^{2/3}$ and $v=(h+d{)}^{2/3}$, the exact zero satisfies $a^2=uv(u+v)$, giving $a=\sqrt{2}(h+d/2)+O(d^2/h)$. For example, inserting any $d>0$ in the exact expression at $a=\sqrt{2}h$ does not give zero. This is a controlled electric dipole approximation, not an exact finite-separation identity.

The electric field within a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium vanishes. The normal electric field boundary condition, with outward normal vector $+\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, therefore gives $\sigma ={ϵ}_0{E}_z(0^{+})$. Directly below the monopole, $a=0$:For the electric dipole,The exact finite-separation answer iswhose Taylor series agrees with the boxed leading term. Although the real point charges have zero total electric charge, their unequal distances leave negative induced surface charge density immediately beneath them.

The image charge construction replaces conductor-induced charge by fictitious sources outside the physical domain. Match the conductor potentials and the far-field condition; uniqueness then fixes the potential in the physical region. For a grounded plane, reflect a charge and reverse its sign, giving attraction $q^2/(16\pi {ϵ}_0{h}^2)$. For a grounded sphere of radius $a$, a charge at distance $R>a$ has image $-qa/R$ at radial distance $a^2/R$. These are examples with prescribed zero potential, not arbitrary isolated conductors.^[ref]

Use horizontal $x$ and upward $y$ in the upper right-angle wedge. The sheets meet electrically, so take their common potential as zero and assume no externally imposed field. For a real charge at $(0,y)$, the image charges in a right-angle conducting wedge are $-q$ at $(y,0)$ and $(-y,0)$, and $+q$ at $(0,-y)$. The first two contributions have cancelling horizontal components. With $K_e=1/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$,Thus the force magnitude at the original height is $\beta /y_0^2$, directed down toward the intersection. The sphere is treated as a point charge, with size much smaller than its distances from the sheets.

Since gravity is already balanced in the uncharged equilibrium, the charged vertical equilibrium satisfies $k(y_e-y_0)+\beta /y_e^2=0$. For $\beta /(k{y}_0^3)\ll 1$, $y_e\simeq y_0-\beta /(k{y}_0^2)$. Differentiating the force givesThe electrostatic softening above a conducting wedge reduces the restoring force; the small-charge vertical equilibrium remains stable.

For the lateral stability of a spring-supported charge in a wedge, the off-axis images of $(x,y)$ are $-q$ at $(y,x)$ and $(-y,-x)$ and $+q$ at $(-x,-y)$. Expansion near the bisector givesSo the electrostatic force is laterally destabilizing: moving toward either sheet strengthens its attraction. In the simplified model where the spring supplies only a vertical force, the overall equilibrium is a saddle and is unstable.

A three-dimensional spring suspension also has geometrical transverse stiffness. If its charged-equilibrium tension is $T$ and length is $\ell$, a small sideways displacement gives spring force $-(T/\ell )x$, with $T=mg+\beta /y_e^2$. The full stability conditions in this suspension model areMotion parallel to the intersection line has no electrostatic stiffness in the ideal infinite-wedge geometry and is stabilized by the positive spring tension. Thus lateral electrostatic destabilization alone does not prove instability of a real hanging spring. At fixed finite support geometry, a sufficiently small charge preserves stability because $D_x=O(q^2)$ while $T/\ell \to mg/\ell >0$. The given vertical-displacement approximation does not specify the attachment length or by itself establish the transverse inequality for an arbitrary charge. The general criterion above states what can be concluded; the saddle verdict applies to the distinct idealization with zero lateral support stiffness.

The method of images solves certain electrostatics problems by replacing a conductor by fictitious electric charges outside the region where the solution is required. The replacement must satisfy the actual boundary values of the electric potential as well as the prescribed sources. The uniqueness of Poisson equation then establishes that the constructed electric potential equals the physical one in that region. The image locations are mathematical devices; they are not real charges inside the metal.

For a point charge $q$ at $(0,0,a)$ above an infinite grounded conducting plane $z=0$, put an image charge $-q$ at $(0,0,-a)$. In a cylindrical coordinate system with coordinates $(s,z)$ the potential in the physical region isThis vanishes at $z=0$, has the required singularity at the real charge, and tends to zero at infinity. With electric field $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi$, the induced surface charge density follows from the normal field immediately above the conductor:The force on $q$ is the field of the image evaluated at the real charge:The electrostatic energy relative to infinite separation is $U=\frac{1}{2}q{\varphi }_{\mathrm{image}}=-q^2/(16\pi {ϵ}_{0}a)$. The factor $1/2$ accounts for the fact that the induced charge changes as the real charge is assembled; treating the image as an independently fixed physical charge would give the wrong energy.

A second standard geometry is a grounded conducting sphere of radius $b$ with a charge $q$ a distance $d>b$ from its centre. Its exterior field is generated by an image $q^{\prime }=-qb/d$ at distance $b^2/d$ from the centre on the line towards the real charge. On the sphere the distances to the real and image charges are in the ratio $d/b$, making their potentials cancel. For an isolated neutral sphere, an additional central image $+qb/d$ makes the total induced charge zero and leaves the surface an equipotential. The construction is powerful for suitable symmetric boundaries, but arbitrary boundaries do not in general admit a finite image system.

An electric dipole is a localized pair of opposite electric charges, or more generally a neutral electric charge distribution with nonzero first electric moment. For charges $-q$ and $+q$ separated by displacement $\mathbf{d}$ directed from negative to positive, the electric dipole moment isA neutral molecule can have a permanent electric dipole moment when its positive and negative charge centres do not coincide. An applied electric field can also produce an induced electric dipole moment by distorting an initially nonpolar electric charge distribution.

At distance $r\gg |\mathbf{d}|$ in vacuum, expand the difference of the two point-charge potentials to first order in the separation. The leading electric potential isThe monopole term cancels because the net electric charge is zero. Taking $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \Phi$ gives the electric dipole fieldOn the dipole axis its magnitude is $2p/(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{r}^3)$ and its direction is along $\mathbf{p}$; in the equatorial plane the magnitude is $p/(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{r}^3)$ and the field points opposite to $\mathbf{p}$. The $r^{-3}$ decay is faster than the $r^{-2}$ field of an isolated point charge.

In a uniform external electric field, the opposite forces on the two charges cancel in their resultant but form a couple. Its torque isFor a fixed permanent electric dipole moment, the interaction potential energy isDifferentiating with respect to orientation recovers the torque. Parallel alignment minimizes $U$ and is stable against a small rotation; antiparallel alignment maximizes $U$ and is unstable. Rotating a fixed dipole slowly from parallel to antiparallel requires external work $2pE$.

A nonuniform electrostatic electric field can also exert a net force. Expanding the two charge forces gives $\mathbf{F}\simeq (\mathbf{p}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{E}$, which equals $\nabla (\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E})$ for a fixed dipole in a curl-free electrostatic field. Thus a suitably aligned dipole is attracted toward stronger field. An induced electric dipole moment requires care in computing energy: when $\mathbf{p}=\alpha \mathbf{E}$ for constant isotropic electric polarizability, building the dipole costs energy and the effective interaction is $U=-\alpha E^2/2$, rather than substituting directly into the fixed-dipole formula. These field, torque and energy effects explain molecular orientation and electric polarization.

Point-charge field and superposition. Coulomb's law gives the Coulomb force on a test electric charge $q_t$ a displacement $\mathbf{R}$ from a source point charge $Q$:The electric field is force per infinitesimal test charge, soIt points outward for positive $Q$ and inward for negative $Q$. For several point charges, the superposition principle adds their fields as vectors:This formula excludes the source points themselves, where the ideal point-charge field is singular.

Exact field components of the pair. PutThe displacement vectors from the positive and negative charges to the observation point are $(x-a)\hat{\mathbf{i}}+y\hat{\mathbf{j}}$ and $(x+a)\hat{\mathbf{i}}+y\hat{\mathbf{j}}$. Including the signs of the charges givesReading off both components,For example, on the perpendicular bisector $x=0$, the two $y$ components cancel and the $x$ components add toward the negative charge, checking both relative signs.

Far-field polar components. The pair's electric dipole moment points from negative to positive charge:Use polar coordinates $x=r\cos \theta$, $y=r\sin \theta$, with $\theta$ measured from that positive dipole axis. The supplied leading electric dipole field becomesTaking the dot products with the radial and angular unit vectors givesThereforeThe unit vectors for polar coordinates are orthonormal, so the magnitude isThe units are $\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{C}}^{-1}$, since the electric dipole moment has units $\mathrm{C}\mathrm{m}$.

Angular sketch and comparison. At fixed large $r$, the magnitude has period $\pi$. It is largest on the dipole axis, $\theta =0,\pi$, with value $2p/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)$, and smallest on the perpendicular directions, $\theta =\pi /2,3\pi /2$, with value $p/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)$. The field magnitude never vanishes at finite $r$ in this dipole approximation:

The neutral charge pair has no net electric charge, so its leading far field falls as $r^{-3}$ and depends on direction. An isolated nonzero point charge has an $r^{-2}$ field whose magnitude is isotropic, with purely radial direction. The dipole also generally has a nonzero $E_{\theta }$ component.

A molecular example is the interaction between permanent electric dipoles of hydrogen chloride molecules, whose unequal charge distributions give each molecule a nonzero electric dipole moment. The electric dipole-dipole interaction depends on their relative orientations:For two parallel dipoles pointing along their line of separation, $U=-2p_1{p}_2/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)<0$, illustrating an attractive molecular configuration.

A point charge idealizes electric charge concentrated at one point. In vacuum, a charge $Q$ at the origin has potential $Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}r)$.

A charge cloud $\rho =A/r$ for $0<r<a$ encloses $Q(r)=2\pi A{r}^2$. With no central point charge and potential zero at infinity, Gauss's law gives $\varphi =A(2a-r)/(2{ϵ}_0)$ inside and $A{a}^2/(2{ϵ}_{0}r)$ outside. The density singularity is integrable, and the potential is finite at the origin.

Three identical like point charges, initially at rest at an equilateral triangle's vertices, remain equilateral as they move away from the fixed centroid. Each resultant force is radial by symmetry. If the centroid radius is $r$, its magnitude is $k_e{q}^2/(\sqrt{3}{r}^2)$. In a nonrelativistic model neglecting radiation, energy conservation gives the final speed $v=\sqrt{2k_e{q}^2/(ma)}$ for initial side $a$ and charge mass $m$.

A torsion balance measures a weak torque by suspending a body from a thin fiber and reading its twist angle. The fiber supports the body's gravitational weight while permitting rotation about the suspension axis. In the range of linear elasticity, a twist $\theta$ in radians, measured from the untwisted reference orientation, produces a restoring torqueThe torsion constant $\kappa$ sets the sensitivity. At static equilibrium with an applied torque ${\tau }_{\mathrm{ext}}$ and no other axial torque, ${\tau }_{\mathrm{ext}}=\kappa \theta$. A perpendicular force $F$ at lever arm $a$ therefore gives $\theta =aF/\kappa$. The torsion balance measures a turning effect: a force whose line of action passes through the suspension axis gives no axial torque. The Cavendish torsion balance is the gravitational application; Coulomb's law supplies an electrical one. ^[ref]

The original schematic separates two ways of reading the same torque. In deflection operation the top attachment stays fixed and the body rotates. In null operation the experimenter rotates the top attachment by $\alpha$ while returning the body's laboratory angle $\beta$ to its original value. If the initially untwisted configuration has $\alpha =\beta =0$, the fiber twist is $\theta =\beta -\alpha$, not $\beta$ alone. ThusFor a positive applied torque, holding $\beta =0$ requires $\alpha =-{\tau }_{\mathrm{ext}}/\kappa$. Keeping the body at the same angle keeps the lever arm and source geometry fixed, making comparison of different applied forces easier. Either readout still requires a calibrated torsion constant and a stable reference orientation.

An illustrative calculation shows the amplification: with $a=0.050\mathrm{m}$, $F=2.0\times 10^{-9}\mathrm{N}$, and $\kappa =1.0\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{N}m/rad$, the applied torque is $1.0\times 10^{-10}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}$ and the equilibrium twist is $0.010\mathrm{rad}\simeq 0.573^{\circ }$. These are stipulated values, not measured data. Reducing the torsion constant tenfold increases this twist tenfold, provided the fiber remains in its calibrated linear elasticity range. The cost is a slower response, explained by the oscillation period in torsion constant.

A concrete laboratory experiment is PASCO's Coulomb balance: level its counterbalanced rod, discharge both conducting spheres, and set the unloaded zero. Charge the spheres at maximum separation; switch off the charging supply. Move the second sphere to a known center separation $R$, then turn the suspension dial until the rod returns to its index mark. Record the dial change and $R$, recharge, and repeat at several separations. The manual recommends a draft-free room, clean insulating supports, and recharging before each reading: leakage, especially in humid conditions, otherwise changes the electric charges during the sequence. At close separations the conducting spheres redistribute charge, so the point charge approximation needs correction. ^[ref]

For constant electric charges and a fixed perpendicular lever arm, the Coulomb's law prediction is $|\theta |\propto R^{-2}$. Plotting the logarithm of twist magnitude against the logarithm of separation gives $\log |\theta |=\text{constant}-2\log R$, so the predicted slope is $-2$. Absolute force measurement additionally needs the torsion constant; comparing ratios can eliminate it if it remains stable. Repeating a reference separation between other settings distinguishes a separation effect from a changing signal. A declining reading at the reference separation would invalidate the assumption of unchanged electric charges, even if a distance plot looks smooth.

The historical electrical example is Coulomb's first memoir of 1785. His apparatus enclosed a suspended needle with a small ball and a second ball; an adjustable head twisted the suspension. After charging the balls by contact, he reported angular separations $36^{\circ }$, $18^{\circ }$, and $8.5^{\circ }$ with head settings $0^{\circ }$, $126^{\circ }$, and $567^{\circ }$. The total twists were approximately $36^{\circ }$, $144^{\circ }$, and $576^{\circ }$: fourfold restoring torque accompanied approximately halved separation. These are his reported observations, not data from our diagrams. ^[ref] A precise reconstruction must use center distances and the changing lever arm, rather than identify angular separation exactly with distance; Alberto A. Martínez's replication explicitly analyzes that geometry. ^[ref]

Sensitivity also exposes changes of the apparatus itself. Fleischer and colleagues' cryogenic torsion balance used a temperature-controlled enclosure to reduce vacuum-vessel top-plate temperature fluctuations to approximately $\pm 0.01\mathrm{K}$, limiting changes in suspension geometry from thermal expansion. They used a mild bake-out near $40^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$ to speed initial fiber relaxation and reduce slow zero motion. Their optical readout compared the pendulum mirror with an internal reference mirror to reject shared optical motion. Room-temperature thermal radiation entering through the optical opening heated the pendulum; a cold filter reduced that load. The authors could not directly measure the pendulum's temperature without disturbing it, and explicitly distinguished the cold shield's temperature from the body's. Cooling therefore requires checking the actual noise and thermal environment, rather than assuming that the fiber and body share the shield's temperature. ^[ref]

A useful control strategy is to record unloaded readings and temperature before and after each signal sequence, recalibrate the torsion constant under the same conditions, and compare forward and reverse settings. The algebra of torsion balance zero drift shows precisely which offsets such comparisons can cancel. A fine angular scale alone does not establish a small measurement error.

For real point charges $Q$ and $-2Q$ at $(0,b)$ and $(a,b)$ above the plane $y=0$, the image charges are $-Q$ and $+2Q$ at the reflected positions. The image charges enforce constant electric potential on the plane. The physical forces follow by summing ordinary Coulomb's law forces on each real charge; the electrostatic-energy factor of one half for induced charges does not multiply this force. The smaller positive charge can have an upward total force component, even though its own image attracts it downward.