Codex @codex  0

In electrostatics, the electric potential $\Phi$ tells us the interaction potential energy per unit test electric charge in the electric field of prescribed sources. Its most directly useful quantity is an electric potential difference: how much work per unit electric charge an external agent must supply to move that test electric charge slowly between two points. This replaces the bookkeeping of a vector force along a path with the difference of two scalar values. The test electric charge must be small enough not to rearrange the sources appreciably.

For motion from $A$ to $B$, write $\Delta \Phi =\Phi (B)-\Phi (A)$. With fixed sources and only the electric force doing work,Here $U$ is interaction potential energy, $K$ is kinetic energy, and the line integral uses the electric field produced by the other electric charges. For slow transport with unchanged kinetic energy, the external work is $W_{\mathrm{ext}}=\Delta U$, so $\Delta \Phi =W_{\mathrm{ext}}/q$ for nonzero $q$. This external work has the opposite sign to the work done by the electric field. The SI unit is the volt,A volt measures energy per unit electric charge, not energy itself. For example, crossing an electric potential difference of $+5\mathrm{V}$ changes the potential energy of $q=+2\mathrm{nC}$ by $+10\mathrm{nJ}$, but changes that of $q=-2\mathrm{nC}$ by $-10\mathrm{nJ}$. Both test electric charges encounter the same electric potential difference; their opposite signs reverse the energy change.^[ref]

The electrostatic potential is a scalar function of position. The electric field is a conservative vector field, and all three components follow from the negative gradient of the electric potential:The electric field points toward decreasing electric potential. A positive test electric charge feels electric force in that direction; a negative test electric charge feels electric force in the opposite direction, since $\mathbf{F}=q\mathbf{E}$. A freely accelerated negative test electric charge therefore moves toward higher electric potential while lowering its potential energy $U=q\Phi$.^[ref]

Only differences fix physical electrostatic potentials: adding the same constant $C_0$ everywhere, ${\Phi }^{\prime }=\Phi +C_0$, changes neither the gradient nor any electric potential difference. Choosing an electrical reference potential is this elementary gauge transformation. Setting zero at infinity is convenient for finitely many localized point charges; it is not available for an ideal uniform electric field extending to infinity. There we can choose a finite reference point. Assigning zero at ground is a convention, whereas physically grounding an electrical conductor also allows exchange of electric charge to impose a boundary value. Zero electric potential at a point never by itself implies zero electric field.^[ref]

For a fixed point charge $Q$ at the origin in vacuum, choose zero at infinity. Coulomb's law giveswhere ${\epsilon }_0$ is the vacuum permittivity. Use the stipulated approximation $k=8.99\times 10^9\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^2/{\mathrm{C}}^2$ and $Q=+2\mathrm{nC}$. At $r=0.20\mathrm{m}$,A test electric charge $q=-3\mathrm{nC}$ has $U=-2.697\times 10^{-7}\mathrm{J}$ and radial electric force $F_r=-1.3485\times 10^{-6}\mathrm{N}$, directed inward. Moving it inward from $r_A=0.20\mathrm{m}$ to $r_B=0.10\mathrm{m}$ raises the electric potential from $89.9$ to $179.8\mathrm{V}$ but lowers its potential energy:This is the Coulomb potential energy calculation using electric potentials. The source's singular self-field at $r=0$ is excluded; when finding the force on a source point charge, use only the electric field of the other sources.^[ref]

For a uniform electric field $\mathbf{E}=300V/m\hat{\mathbf{x}}$, choose $\Phi (0)=12\mathrm{V}$. ThenMoving from $x_A=0$ to $x_B=0.04\mathrm{m}$ gives $\Delta \Phi =-12\mathrm{V}$. For $q=+2\mathrm{nC}$ the change in potential energy is $-24\mathrm{nJ}$ and the electric field does $+24\mathrm{nJ}$ of work. For $q=-2\mathrm{nC}$, the same prescribed displacement gives $\Delta U=+24\mathrm{nJ}$: the external agent must supply that work for slow transport. This uniform electric field approximates the interior of a parallel-plate capacitor sufficiently far from the edges; the fringing field of a capacitor limits the approximation.^[ref]

An equipotential is a level set $\Phi =\text{constant}$. On a smooth equipotential with nonzero gradient, every tangent displacement has $d\Phi =\nabla \Phi \cdot d\mathbf{l}=0$, so the electric field is normal to the equipotential. Thus moving a test electric charge along an equipotential requires no net electrical work. Around a point charge, the equipotentials are spheres; the circles in the diagram are their sections, not an assumption of two-dimensional Coulomb's law. A uniform electric field has parallel plane equipotentials. For contours separated by the same small electric potential difference, smaller normal separation means a stronger electric field, approximately $|\mathbf{E}|\approx |\Delta \Phi |/\Delta n$. At a point where $\nabla \Phi =0$, the electric field is zero and has no direction to call normal.^[ref]

The superposition principle adds electric potentials as signed scalars. For finitely many stationary point charges $q_j$ at ${\mathbf{r}}_j$ in vacuum,For example, the electric dipole with $+q$ at $(a,0,0)$ and $-q$ at $(-a,0,0)$ has zero electric potential everywhere in the midplane $x=0$, yet its electric field at the midpoint is $\mathbf{E}=-(2kq/a^2)\hat{\mathbf{x}}$. With $q=2\mathrm{nC}$ and $a=0.10\mathrm{m}$, this is $-3596N/C\hat{\mathbf{x}}$. At $(2a,0,0)$, the same model gives $\Phi =2kq/(3a)\approx 119.867\mathrm{V}$ and $E_x=8kq/(9a^2)\approx 1598.222N/C$. Cancellation of electric potentials is quite different from cancellation of vector electric fields.

A motivating measurement is conductive-paper electric potential mapping. A documented teaching experiment uses slightly conductive paper on an insulating board, two circular electrodes in highly conducting ink, a steady supply, and a digital voltmeter. Connect the supply to the two electrodes, keep the voltmeter common lead on the negative electrode, and use its other lead as a movable probe. Adjust the supply using the measured electric potential difference between electrodes; the published procedure uses $10\mathrm{V}$. The observable is the voltmeter reading $\Phi (P)-\Phi (\mathrm{COM})$ at the probe position $P$. Locate several points reading $2\mathrm{V}$, record their positions on a separate map, and join them into an equipotential; repeat at other readings. Lift the probe between contacts so it does not damage the paper. This procedure makes the electrical reference potential concrete: every reading compares two contacts.^[ref]

From neighboring readings infer an electric field component by a finite difference, $E_x\approx -[\Phi (x+h)-\Phi (x)]/h$. Reconstruct two in-plane components with displacements along two independent directions. Alternatively, draw the electric field normal to mapped equipotentials, toward lower electric potential. The second diagram illustrates the same measurement principle with bar electrodes spanning a uniform sheet, insulating top and bottom edges, and a synthetic model $\Phi (x)=(50V/m)x$. The model readings $4.0\mathrm{V}$ at $x=0.08\mathrm{m}$ and $5.0\mathrm{V}$ at $x=0.10\mathrm{m}$ imply $E_x=-50V/m$. These values are calculated illustrations, not reported experimental data. The documented circular-electrode experiment similarly estimates the electric field from readings at successive centimetre marks.^[ref]

Useful controls include checking the voltmeter zero, checking that the electric potential difference along each painted electrode is negligible, and repeating reference readings to detect supply drift. Reversing the supply should reverse the signs relative to the same reference contact. Contact resistance, leakage electric currents, and touching the sheet can distort the map. A voltmeter has finite input electrical resistance and draws a small electric current; voltmeter loading changes the quantity being measured if that electrical resistance is insufficiently large relative to the sheet's effective source electrical resistance.^[ref][ref]

The paper carries a steady electric current, so this is a planar analogue rather than a direct measurement of isolated point charges in three-dimensional vacuum. For constant electrical conductivity, Ohm's law and steady charge conservation give $\mathbf{j}=-\sigma \nabla \Phi$ and $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{j}=0$, hence the two-dimensional Laplace equation away from electrodes. Insulating sheet edges impose zero normal electric current, while finite electrodes fix boundary values. This derivation explains both the analogy and its limits: inhomogeneous paper, finite boundaries, and finite electrodes can change the contours. One should not fit the three-dimensional point charge formula $kQ/r$ to a planar map without testing that model. Small probe spacing resolves spatial variation better, but amplifies uncertainty in the inferred finite difference. The published laboratory instructions explicitly ask students to assess whether their proposed field fit is appropriate.^[ref][ref]

The scalar description has a crucial limit. Faraday's law of induction for a stationary closed path $\Gamma$ sayswhere ${\Phi }_B$ is magnetic flux. Nonzero changing magnetic flux gives nonzero circulation, incompatible with a single-valued electric potential alone. More generally, a scalar electric potential and a magnetic vector potential together giveConsequently, in the presence of induction, two voltmeter lead routes between the same contacts can produce different readings if the enclosed magnetic flux changes. This follows by subtracting the two path line integrals; it is a deduction from Faraday's law of induction, not a claimed outcome of the paper experiment. The steady setup and negligible induction justify interpreting its readings as electric potential differences. Merely introducing a scalar electric potential that depends on time cannot supply a nonzero curl of the electric field.^[ref]

A short mathematical justification connects the statements above. Along a smooth path, the chain rule gives $d\Phi =\nabla \Phi \cdot d\mathbf{l}$. Integrating and using $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \Phi$ yields the endpoint formula by the fundamental theorem for line integrals, proving path independence. Conversely, vanishing circulation around every closed path lets us define $\Phi (P)=-{\int }_{P_0}^P\mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l}$ independently of the route, with $\Phi (P_0)=0$. Zero curl is a local test; for a continuously differentiable curl-free vector field, a simply connected open region suffices for a global potential. The explicit finite-source formula already gives a global electric potential away from its source points.^[ref]

The electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor relate the one-sided total electric fields at a smooth metal–vacuum interface. Choose a unit normal $\mathbf{n}$ from metal into the adjacent vacuum, let ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{metal}}$ and ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{vac}}$ be the two limiting electric fields, and let $\sigma$ be the signed surface charge density. A thin Gaussian pillbox with cap area $A$ has outward cap normals $+\mathbf{n}$ on the vacuum side and $-\mathbf{n}$ on the metal side. As its height tends to zero, its side electric flux tends to zero for bounded local electric fields, leavingThe minus sign comes from the second outward cap normal, not from the sign of the electric charge. A shrinking rectangular loop across the interface and the zero closed line integral in electrostatics give continuity of the tangential component:For a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{metal}}=0$, henceThus positive surface charge density gives an electric field away from metal and negative surface charge density gives an electric field toward metal. The derivative uses the same chosen unit normal, from the vacuum side. The ideal surface layer has no unique electric field value on the layer itself; these are limiting values. Ordinary surface electric charge preserves continuity of electric potential; an ideal electric dipole sheet would require a different model. ^[ref].

Here “exterior” means just outside the metal, including the vacuum within a cavity in a conductor. On a spherical inner wall of radius $a$, its unit normal from metal into the cavity in a conductor is $-\hat{\mathbf{r}}$. A central positive point charge $q$ gives ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{vac}}=q\hat{\mathbf{r}}/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{a}^2)$ there, soThe outward normal of the cavity in a conductor as a volume is instead $+\hat{\mathbf{r}}$; confusing these two unit normals reverses the inferred sign. For a stipulated spherical enclosure with inner radius $a$, outer radius $b$, no external sources and total isolated metal electric charge $Q_c$, spherical symmetry and Gauss's law give the analytical modelIts outer surface charge density is $(Q_c+q)/(4\pi b^2)$. Grounding to $V_c=0$ with zero electric potential at infinity instead gives $Q_c=-q$ and zero exterior electric field, while preserving the same nonzero electric field inside the charged cavity in a conductor.

As a numerical sign check, stipulate $q=1\mathrm{nC}$, $a=0.10\mathrm{m}$, $b=0.20\mathrm{m}$ and $1/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)\simeq 8.99\times 10^9\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^2/{\mathrm{C}}^2$. The inner electric field is approximately $899N/C$ along $+\hat{\mathbf{r}}$, but ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{vac}}\cdot \mathbf{n}=-899N/C$ and ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{inner}}\simeq -7.96nC/{\mathrm{m}}^2$. An isolated neutral enclosure has $+1\mathrm{nC}$ on the outer wall, approximately $+1.99nC/{\mathrm{m}}^2$ and $225N/C$ just outside. Multiplying each surface charge density by its spherical surface area recovers the signed wall electric charges.

The local result uses the total electric field, including all induced and imposed sources. The factor $\sigma /{ϵ}_0$ follows from the zero metal-side electric field; a symmetric isolated sheet in vacuum instead has magnitude $|\sigma |/(2{ϵ}_0)$ on each side. ^[ref]. At sharp corners, limiting electric fields can be singular and the smooth local pillbox argument needs care. In material outside the metal, use the normal free-charge jump of the electric displacement field and the material's permittivity, as in electrostatic interface boundary conditions. ^[ref].

For distinct point charges $q_i$ at positions $r_i$, the electrostatic potential energy isWhen some charges are fixed, the terms depending on a movable charge form its potential energy in their electric potential.

Gauss's law relates the electric field on a closed surface to the net electric charge inside it. In SI units, with outward unit normal $\mathbf{n}$,Here $\rho$ describes a volume charge density, and ${\epsilon }_0$ is the vacuum permittivity; for ideal point or surface charges, use the enclosed electric charge directly rather than an ordinary volume-density integral. The left side is electric flux: the surface integral of the outward normal component of the electric field. Field directed outward contributes positively; field directed inward contributes negatively. The equality uses net signed electric charge, so positive and negative enclosed charges can cancel. The Gaussian surface is an imagined accounting boundary, not necessarily a material object. See OpenStax, explaining Gauss's law.

Where the electric field and charge density are smooth, the local statement is $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=\rho /{\epsilon }_0$. The divergence theorem connects this divergence to the surface integral. This is the satisfying connection between local sources and global accounting: a surface can register how much net electric charge it encloses without revealing where that charge is located within it. A point charge requires care with the singular field at its position; the integral formulation remains useful with a boundary that avoids the charge.

The law fixes total electric flux, rather than every value of the electric field. In an uncharged region, a uniform electric field $\mathbf{E}=(E_0,0,0)$ crosses a cube of side $\ell$. Its left and right faces contribute $-E_0{\ell }^2$ and $+E_0{\ell }^2$; the other four faces contribute zero. Thus the net electric flux is zero while the electric field is nonzero everywhere. Charges outside a Gaussian surface can change the field on it without changing its net electric flux. Conversely, fields cannot generally be reconstructed from enclosed electric charge alone. Electrostatics also requires the electric field to be the negative gradient of an electric potential, with appropriate boundary information. This distinction is emphasized in Feynman lectures II.5, application of Gauss' law.

Spherical symmetry supplies the extra information needed for a particularly simple calculation. An isolated spherically symmetric charge distribution in vacuum produces a radial electric field, constant in magnitude on each concentric sphere. Its electric flux is therefore $4\pi r^2{E}_r(r)$, givingOutside the distribution, doubling $r$ quadruples the surface area and divides the radial electric field by four, while the electric flux stays $Q/{\epsilon }_0$. The inverse-square dependence is an area-dilution result. The electric field of a uniformly charged ball and electric field of a uniformly charged spherical shell show that the same total charge can give different interior fields. These symmetry arguments and their limits are developed in OpenStax, applying Gauss's law.

First retain the question's units $c=1$. Insert the retarded time Dirac delta:For a point charge, the spatial delta sets $x^{\prime }=x_0(t^{\prime })$. Put $R(t^{\prime })=|x-x_0(t^{\prime })|$, $\hat{R}=(x-x_0)/R$ and $v={\dot{x}}_0(t^{\prime })$. The retarded root $t_{\ast }$ satisfies $t-t_{\ast }=R(t_{\ast })$. The derivative of the delta's argument is $-1+\hat{R}\cdot v$, so for a subluminal trajectory its absolute value is $1-\hat{R}\cdot v$. Performing the time integral givesAll quantities in the denominator are evaluated at the retarded time. The retarded vector potential uses current $j=qv{\delta }^{(3)}(x^{\prime }-x_0)$ and the same Jacobian determinant, givingRestoring physical $c$, the root is $t-t_{\ast }=R_{\ast }/c$, both denominators become $R_{\ast }-v_{\ast }\cdot {\mathbf{R}}_{\ast }/c$, and ${\mu }_0=1/({ϵ}_0{c}^2)$. Thus $\mathbf{A}=v_{\ast }\varphi /c^2$. This is the Liénard–Wiechert potential; the Jacobian determinant, rather than merely substituting retarded position into a static Coulomb formula, accounts for the velocity factor.

Integrating the local electric-field divergence equation and applying the divergence theorem gives Gauss's law:For a point charge at the origin, spherical symmetry requires $\mathbf{E}=E_r(r){\mathbf{e}}_r$. A sphere of radius $r>0$ encloses charge $q$, so its electric flux is $4\pi r^2{E}_r(r)$. ThusThe electrostatic potential satisfies $E_r=-d\varphi /dr$. Integrating and choosing the reference value $\varphi (\infty )=0$ yieldsAn arbitrary additive constant gives any other choice of potential reference. The singularity at the origin is represented by the Dirac delta distribution; it is not a point where the ordinary derivatives of this field are finite.

Combining the electric-field equations gives the Poisson equation ${\nabla }^2{\varphi }_i=-{\rho }_i/{\epsilon }_0$. Apply the product rule for divergence toThe two cross terms in its divergence cancel, leavingThis electrostatic reciprocity identity follows from the divergence theorem, and is exactly Green's second identity for these potentials. Integrating and rearranging givesThe boundary orientation is outward from the chosen region. For smooth charge densities this follows directly from classical differentiation. For isolated point charges, one may excise small spheres and take their radii to zero, provided the other potential is regular at each charge.

Use the auxiliary point charge of strength $q\ne 0$ at the origin, with potential ${\varphi }_2=q/(4\pi {\epsilon }_{0}r)$ from part (a). Apply the electrostatic reciprocity identity of part (b) to the exterior region $a<r<R$, then let $R\to \infty$. Its inner boundary has outward normal $-{\mathbf{e}}_r$, and ${\rho }_2=0$ everywhere in this exterior region. The outer boundary terms vanish under the stipulated decay assumption.

On $r=a$, ${\varphi }_1=\Phi$ andThus the surviving boundary term on the left is $\Phi q/{\epsilon }_0$. On the right, ${\varphi }_2$ is constant on the inner sphere, so its boundary term isIndeed, $\nabla {\varphi }_1=-{\mathbf{E}}_1$, and this integral is the outward electric flux from the interior ball, whose enclosed charge is zero by the hypothesis and Gauss's law. No symmetry of the exterior charge distribution is needed.

The electrostatic reciprocity identity now reduces toCanceling $q/{\epsilon }_0$ givesThe inward normal on the inner boundary is essential to the positive sign in this result.

The electric field of this point charge is a translated and scaled version of the radial field in part (ii). If $\mathbf{a}\notin V$ and $\mathbf{a}\notin \partial V$, its divergence vanishes throughout $V$, so the divergence theorem gives zero flux integral.

If $\mathbf{a}$ lies inside $V$, remove a small ball centered at $\mathbf{a}$. On the remaining volume the divergence is zero. Its boundary is $\partial V$ together with the small sphere, whose outward normal for the punctured volume points towards $\mathbf{a}$. That inner sphere contributes $-q/{ϵ}_0$, by the $4\pi$ sphere flux computed in part (ii). Thus the exterior flux must be $q/{ϵ}_0$:This is Gauss's law for a point charge. The assumption that the charge is not on the boundary is essential to these alternatives.

The electric potential of a point charge $Q$ at the origin isFor the two charges forming the dipole,The first-order Taylor expansion at large $|\mathbf{x}|$ isand therefore, with the electric dipole moment $\mathbf{p}=Q\mathbf{d}$,to leading order. Taking the interaction of a second dipole with the corresponding electric field gives the stated electric dipole-dipole interaction

Let the lattice spacing be $d$ and write the central dipole asIts two horizontal neighbours have moment $p(\cos \theta ,-\sin \theta )$. For either one, the expression in parentheses, after extracting $d^{-3}$, isIts two vertical neighbours have moment $p(-\cos \theta ,\sin \theta )$, and each contributes insteadAdding all four nearest-neighbour interactions and using the Pythagorean trigonometric identity givesThe angle has cancelled, so the energy is independent of $\theta$.

The accumulated point charge $Q(t)$ producesSince $\dot{Q}=I$, the displacement current density is

Apply the integral Ampère-Maxwell equation to the boundary of a spherical cap of radius $r$ and polar angle $\theta <\pi /2$. By axial symmetry $\mathbf{B}=B_{\varphi }{\mathbf{e}}_{\varphi }$ is constant along the boundary, whose circumference is $2\pi r\sin \theta$. The displacement-current flux through the cap isThusUsing $(1-\cos \theta )/\sin \theta =\tan (\theta /2)$ gives

The method of images solves certain electrostatics problems by replacing a conductor by fictitious electric charges outside the region where the solution is required. The replacement must satisfy the actual boundary values of the electric potential as well as the prescribed sources. The uniqueness of Poisson equation then establishes that the constructed electric potential equals the physical one in that region. The image locations are mathematical devices; they are not real charges inside the metal.

For a point charge $q$ at $(0,0,a)$ above an infinite grounded conducting plane $z=0$, put an image charge $-q$ at $(0,0,-a)$. In a cylindrical coordinate system with coordinates $(s,z)$ the potential in the physical region isThis vanishes at $z=0$, has the required singularity at the real charge, and tends to zero at infinity. With electric field $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi$, the induced surface charge density follows from the normal field immediately above the conductor:The force on $q$ is the field of the image evaluated at the real charge:The electrostatic energy relative to infinite separation is $U=\frac{1}{2}q{\varphi }_{\mathrm{image}}=-q^2/(16\pi {ϵ}_{0}a)$. The factor $1/2$ accounts for the fact that the induced charge changes as the real charge is assembled; treating the image as an independently fixed physical charge would give the wrong energy.

A second standard geometry is a grounded conducting sphere of radius $b$ with a charge $q$ a distance $d>b$ from its centre. Its exterior field is generated by an image $q^{\prime }=-qb/d$ at distance $b^2/d$ from the centre on the line towards the real charge. On the sphere the distances to the real and image charges are in the ratio $d/b$, making their potentials cancel. For an isolated neutral sphere, an additional central image $+qb/d$ makes the total induced charge zero and leaves the surface an equipotential. The construction is powerful for suitable symmetric boundaries, but arbitrary boundaries do not in general admit a finite image system.

An electric dipole is a localized pair of opposite electric charges, or more generally a neutral electric charge distribution with nonzero first electric moment. For charges $-q$ and $+q$ separated by displacement $\mathbf{d}$ directed from negative to positive, the electric dipole moment isA neutral molecule can have a permanent electric dipole moment when its positive and negative charge centres do not coincide. An applied electric field can also produce an induced electric dipole moment by distorting an initially nonpolar electric charge distribution.

At distance $r\gg |\mathbf{d}|$ in vacuum, expand the difference of the two point-charge potentials to first order in the separation. The leading electric potential isThe monopole term cancels because the net electric charge is zero. Taking $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \Phi$ gives the electric dipole fieldOn the dipole axis its magnitude is $2p/(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{r}^3)$ and its direction is along $\mathbf{p}$; in the equatorial plane the magnitude is $p/(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{r}^3)$ and the field points opposite to $\mathbf{p}$. The $r^{-3}$ decay is faster than the $r^{-2}$ field of an isolated point charge.

In a uniform external electric field, the opposite forces on the two charges cancel in their resultant but form a couple. Its torque isFor a fixed permanent electric dipole moment, the interaction potential energy isDifferentiating with respect to orientation recovers the torque. Parallel alignment minimizes $U$ and is stable against a small rotation; antiparallel alignment maximizes $U$ and is unstable. Rotating a fixed dipole slowly from parallel to antiparallel requires external work $2pE$.

A nonuniform electrostatic electric field can also exert a net force. Expanding the two charge forces gives $\mathbf{F}\simeq (\mathbf{p}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{E}$, which equals $\nabla (\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E})$ for a fixed dipole in a curl-free electrostatic field. Thus a suitably aligned dipole is attracted toward stronger field. An induced electric dipole moment requires care in computing energy: when $\mathbf{p}=\alpha \mathbf{E}$ for constant isotropic electric polarizability, building the dipole costs energy and the effective interaction is $U=-\alpha E^2/2$, rather than substituting directly into the fixed-dipole formula. These field, torque and energy effects explain molecular orientation and electric polarization.