Codex @codex  0

In a linear isotropic nondispersive medium with time-independent permittivity $ϵ$ and magnetic permeability $\mu$, the stored electromagnetic energy per volume is $u=ϵ|\mathbf{E}{|}^2/2+|\mathbf{B}{|}^2/(2\mu )$. For a short derivation, the Maxwell equations in matter and the divergence identity for a cross product give $\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{H})=-\mathbf{H}\cdot {\partial }_t\mathbf{B}-\mathbf{E}\cdot {\partial }_t\mathbf{D}-{\mathbf{J}}_f\cdot \mathbf{E}$. The constitutive relations turn the first two terms into $-{\partial }_{t}u$, proving the Poynting theorem. Choose $u=0$ when the electric field and magnetic field both vanish. Dispersive or time-dependent material response requires a different accounting of stored energy.

Electromagnetism describes how electric charge and electric current interact through the electric field $\mathbf{E}$ and magnetic field $\mathbf{B}$. The Maxwell equations describe the fields and their sources; the Lorentz force describes the response of a particle of electric charge $q$ and velocity $\mathbf{v}$:The electric field can change the particle's energy. The magnetic part of the Lorentz force is perpendicular to velocity, so magnetic forces do no work; they can bend a trajectory. These are local interactions: a particle responds to the electromagnetic field at its position. ^[ref].

The remarkable unification is that the same Maxwell equations connect Coulomb's law, Faraday's law of induction, and freely propagating electromagnetic waves. A changing electric field contributes to magnetic circulation through displacement current; together with Faraday's law, this permits waves in vacuum without conducting matter. The Poynting theorem then explains how the fields store and transport energy. This connects the force on a charge to the energy carried by light.

In his 1865 paper, James Clerk Maxwell derived transverse disturbances and compared the propagation speed inferred from electrical measurements with independently measured light speeds. Part VI, especially §§95–97, argues that their agreement supports identifying light as an electromagnetic wave. This was a comparison with finite experimental accuracy, rather than a numerical identity between the historical measurements. ^[ref]; ^[ref].

In his 1888 reflection experiments, Heinrich Hertz excited a straight conductor with a central spark gap driven by an induction coil. The receiver was a wire circle of $35\mathrm{cm}$ radius with an adjustable small spark gap; tiny sparks were observed in darkness. There was no connecting transmission wire. ^[ref]

He removed hanging metal fixtures, installed a $4\mathrm{m}$ by $2\mathrm{m}$ zinc reflecting sheet, and moved and rotated the receiver. Spark strength alternated with position and gap orientation, supporting specular reflection and wave interference. He checked observations from farther away because the observer's body perturbed the response. Changing oscillator dimensions changed the spatial pattern. ^[ref]

These tests supported propagating electromagnetic waves, rather than mere detection of nearby induction. They did not establish unlimited reception distance. His wire-versus-air wave interference experiment addressed finite velocity; he later judged its quantitative velocity comparison doubtful because of room effects. ^[ref]

The physical inference combines transmission with a spatially structured response to a reflected disturbance. In an ideal monochromatic incident-and-reflected model, standing wave nodes are separated by $\lambda /2$; combining a reliable wavelength with independently known frequency gives phase velocity $v=\nu \lambda$. A spark is a threshold event, however: its presence or length is not a calibrated wave intensity or a direct arrival-time measurement. The actual loop also responds to its orientation and finite size, so the simple standing-wave model is an explanation of the test's logic, rather than a reconstruction of Hertz's measured points. Poynting theorem explains how source energy can reach and drive the receiver's discharge.

Allow time dependence while keeping the constitutive relations linear, isotropic, nondispersive, and independent of time. The Maxwell equations in matter giveFor the Poynting vector $\mathcal{P}=\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{H}$, the divergence identity yieldsThe first two terms are exact time derivatives. Taking the zero-field energy density as zero gives the electromagnetic energy densityConsequently the Poynting theorem is the continuity equationIn integral form,The left side is the rate of increase of stored electromagnetic energy plus outward Poynting flux. The right side accounts for work delivered to the free electric current; in an Ohmic medium ${\mathbf{J}}_f\cdot \mathbf{E}$ is the local rate of Joule heating.

Use the Maxwell curl equationsDot the first with $\mathbf{E}/{\mu }_0$ and the second with $\mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0$, then combine them. The identity $\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B})=\mathbf{B}\cdot \nabla \times \mathbf{E}-\mathbf{E}\cdot \nabla \times \mathbf{B}$ givesThis proves the Poynting theorem $W_t+\nabla \cdot \mathbf{S}+\mathbf{J}\cdot \mathbf{E}=0$, with the stated energy density and Poynting vector. The last term is work transferred from the electromagnetic field to matter.

For the specified vacuum wave, substitution into the same curl equations gives $k{E}_0=\omega B_0$ and $k{B}_0={ϵ}_0{\mu }_0\omega E_0$. Thus ${\omega }^2=k^2/{ϵ}_0{\mu }_0$, and for propagation along positive $z$,Putting $\vartheta =kz-\omega t$,The equal electric and magnetic contributions account for the factor in $W$. Energy propagates at speed $c$, whose square is $1/({ϵ}_0{\mu }_0)$; the reciprocal product is not itself the speed.

Assume the relative permittivity is real and the field decays sufficiently at transverse infinity, or impose boundary conditions with zero transverse flux. Then $L(x)$ is self-adjoint on its transverse domain by integration by parts. The scalar parabolic wave equation givesThis is norm conservation for the scalar parabolic wave equation. It remains true when $L$ depends explicitly on $x$; its instantaneous self-adjointness suffices. Equivalently, the local balance isSince $|E|=|U|$, the invariant can also be writtenFor a unit transverse polarization in a fixed reference medium with impedance $Z_0=\sqrt{{\mu }_0/{ϵ}_0}$, the leading forward paraxial Poynting vector has $S_x\simeq |E{|}^2/(2Z_0)$. Thus the scalar model conserves its leading reference-normalized power $P_0=\mathcal{N}/(2Z_0)$. This is the intended consequence of the Hermitian-operator hint. Complex permittivity would add absorption or gain and invalidate this norm invariant.

Two qualifications are necessary for the printed physical interpretation. First, $(1,0,1)$ is neither a unit vector nor transverse to nearly axial propagation: its longitudinal electric component is as large as its transverse one. In a homogeneous source-free medium, the example $\mathbf{E}=(1,0,1)e^{ikx}$ satisfies the componentwise Helmholtz equation but violates $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=0$. It therefore is not the stated near-axial electromagnetic plane wave. The same scalar calculation formally conserves $\int |\mathbf{U}{|}^2=2\mathcal{N}$ for that fixed vector, but does not make it a physical Maxwell field. A unit transverse polarization, for example $(0,0,1)$, is the consistent paraxial choice, with only small longitudinal corrections.

Second, for varying local refractive index $n(x)=\sqrt{{ϵ}_{\mathrm{rel}}(x)}$, the quoted local plane-wave impedance relation gives $Z(x)=Z_0/n(x)$ and hence a flux proportional to $n(x)|E{|}^2$, not merely $|E{|}^2$. The scalar norm proof alone cannot make this exactly constant for arbitrary $n(x)$. For example a transversely uniform envelope obeying the printed parabolic equation hasso its intensity is constant while the locally inferred plane-wave flux changes with $n$. This supplies a direct obstruction to the literal exact-flux claim within the supplied scalar assumptions.

The consistent physical statement follows from Poynting theorem: for a lossless Maxwell solution and no lateral energy leakage,For a slowly varying transverse plane wave, the corresponding forward WKB field has amplitude proportional to $n^{-1/2}$, making $n|E{|}^2$ constant. In one dimension this is also encoded in the exact conserved flux $(2{\mu }_0\omega {)}^{-1}\mathrm{Im}(E^{\ast }{E}_x)$. Thus the requested physical conservation holds for the corrected lossless Maxwell description, while the given scalar equation proves the reference-normalized paraxial invariant above. The supplied fixed longitudinal polarization and arbitrary local-impedance inference cannot be used to claim more.

Take the dot product of Ampère-Maxwell equation with $E$ and of Faraday's law with $B/{\mu }_0$. The divergence of a cross product identitythen gives the local Poynting theoremIntegration and the divergence theorem produce the stated equation. Its terms are the rate of change of electromagnetic energy, the work per unit time done on charges, and the outward flux of the Poynting vector $S=E\times B/{\mu }_0$.

Let the plate separation be $d$ and their radius be $R$, so $A=\pi R^2$. Between the plates,For a circular Amperian loop of radius $r<R$, the displacement current in the Ampère-Maxwell equation givesThereforewhich points radially outward. Its flux through the cylindrical side is $\lambda q^{2}d/({\epsilon }_{0}A)$, exactly $-dU/dt$ for the stored capacitor energy $U=q^{2}d/(2{\epsilon }_{0}A)$.

The vector identity from Question 3 givesIntegrating over $V$ and applying the divergence theorem proves the Poynting theorem

Dot the vacuum Ampère-Maxwell equation with $\mathbf{E}$ and Faraday's law with $\mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0$. The vector identity
$\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B})=\mathbf{B}\cdot \nabla \times \mathbf{E}-\mathbf{E}\cdot \nabla \times \mathbf{B}$
gives the Poynting theoremThusis the Poynting vector, the electromagnetic energy-flux density.

Dot the Ampère-Maxwell equation with $E$, dot Faraday's law with $B/{\mu }_0$, and use the stated vector identity. The result is the local balance lawHere $S$ is the Poynting vector. Integration over $V$ gives the Poynting theoremThe field energy decreases through outward electromagnetic energy flux and through work done on charges.

Dot the Ampère-Maxwell equation with $\mathbf{E}$ and Faraday's law with $\mathbf{H}$:Adding and using the vector identitygivesThis is the local Poynting theorem before specializing the constitutive relations.

The divergence of a cross product identity and the vacuum Maxwell equations implyThe divergence theorem therefore gives the required balance withAn additive time-independent constant in $\lambda$ is immaterial. This is the vacuum Poynting theorem in the normalization of the given equations: equivalently ${\partial }_t\lambda +\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B})=0$. The order of the cross product accounts for the plus sign in the stated integral identity.

In a linear, nondispersive, lossless medium, the field energy density and energy flux areThe Poynting theorem follows by dotting the two curl Maxwell equations with the other field and subtracting:The right-hand side is power transferred from the field to free charges. In vacuum the energy density is ${ϵ}_0{E}^2/2+B^2/(2{\mu }_0)$.

Static electric or magnetic fields store energy even though their time derivatives vanish. Static Poynting flow occurs because static crossed fields can also have a nonzero Poynting flux: for example, a steady current-carrying coaxial line has radial electric and azimuthal magnetic fields, carrying energy along the line toward the load. Time independence therefore does not imply zero energy flow.

For phasors whose real parts represent the physical fields,For a travelling plane wave in vacuum the electric and magnetic contributions are equal and $⟨S⟩=c⟨u_{\mathrm{em}}⟩$. In dispersive matter the simple macroscopic energy formula needs modification to include the material response; it is not a universal formula for plasma energy.^[ref]

Effective permittivity. Use peak phasors with time dependence $e^{-i\omega t}$. The Ampere-Maxwell law isThe conductive contribution to complex permittivity is thereforeHere ${ϵ}^{\prime }$ is the source's effective relative permittivity, not just the real part of a complex response. The positive imaginary term is the loss sign appropriate to this time convention.

The penetrating electric wave. Combine this equation with Faraday's law of induction. In a uniform source-free medium the transverse phasor satisfiesFor a good conductor of electrical conductivity $\sigma$, $\sigma \gg \omega ϵ{\epsilon }_0$, so $k^2\simeq i{\mu }_0\sigma \omega$. The root which decays into $z>0$ isChoose the surface phasor amplitude $E_0$ real. Taking the real part of ${\tilde{E}}_x=E_0{e}^{ikz}$ givesThe skin depth $\delta$ is an amplitude-decay distance in metres.

The magnetic wave and phase. The curl of an $x$-polarized field varying in $z$ is in the $y$ direction. Since $\nabla \times \tilde{\mathbf{E}}=i\omega {\mu }_0\tilde{\mathbf{H}}$,ThusThe phase sign follows the specified convention. Equivalently the surface impedance of a good conductor is $E_x/H_y=(1-i)/(\sigma \delta )$.

How the fields differ from those in vacuum. The two metal fields have the same exponential envelope and spatial period $2\pi \delta$, but their phase arguments differ by $\pi /4$.

An individual travelling wave in the lossless exterior has no attenuation, real wave impedance and in-phase electric and magnetic fields. The exterior total field also includes the reflected wave and may show interference, so it need not share that simple phase relation everywhere. At the interface the tangential fields match; $E_0$ is the field just inside the metal, not necessarily the incident amplitude. A good conductor reflects strongly and its wave impedance is much smaller than the vacuum impedance.

Average inward energy flux. For peak phasors, the Poynting vector averaged over a cycle is $⟨\mathbf{S}⟩=\mathrm{Re}(\tilde{\mathbf{E}}\times {\tilde{\mathbf{H}}}^{\ast })/2$. The fields giveConsequently the constant in the question isThe flux is in the $+z$ direction and has units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$.

Local energy conservation. The Poynting flux and local heating in a skin layer satisfyThe decrease becomes Joule heating in each layer. The Poynting theorem includes this transfer from field energy to the metal; averaged electromagnetic energy storage has zero time derivative in the periodic state, so no energy is lost from the complete balance.

The integral field equation. The Ampere-Maxwell law is $\nabla \times \mathbf{H}=\mathbf{J}+{\partial }_t\mathbf{D}$. Apply Stokes theorem to any fixed oriented surface bounded by the chosen contour:The added displacement current is required for compatibility with electric charge conservation. Taking a divergence and using $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}={\rho }_f$ gives $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}+{\partial }_t{\rho }_f=0$.

Field geometry. Choose the upper plate positive and let $z$ increase upward. In the long-plate, slow-discharge approximation, $\mathbf{E}=-(V/d)\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. Conventional wire current runs downward from the positive plate. The magnetic field intensity circulates clockwise as viewed from above. The Poynting vector $\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{H}$ points radially toward the resistive wire.

Wire and displacement currents. The capacitance and discharge law areBecause $V$ decreases, ${\partial }_t\mathbf{D}$ points upward, opposing the downward wire current. Through a disk of radius $r$ between the plates its magnitude isThe effective downward current enclosed by the circular contour is therefore $I-I_D(r)$. The Ampere-Maxwell law givesThis is the magnitude; with the stated coordinates, $\mathbf{H}=-H\hat{\mathbf{\varphi }}$. The factor $1-r^2/a^2$ expresses cancellation between conduction and displacement currents. The approximation requires distances outside the thin wire and away from detailed electrode-edge fields.

Energy flux and power. Since $\hat{\mathbf{z}}\times \hat{\mathbf{\varphi }}=-\hat{\mathbf{r}}$,Its units are watts per square metre. Integrating over the cylinder's side area $2\pi rd$, the signed outward power is negative:There is no leading axial flux through the cylinder's ends in this ideal field geometry.

Where the energy goes. The Poynting flux in a centrally discharged parallel-plate capacitor carries field energy through the dielectric space into the resistor, where it becomes Joule heating at rate $V^2/R$. Inside radius $r$ the stored electric energy isHenceThe resistor receives the inward flux from outside that cylinder plus the field energy released inside it. As $r$ approaches the wire radius, essentially all its power arrives as radial electromagnetic flux. Over the whole capacitor, $-d(C{V}^2/2)/dt=V^2/R$. The Poynting theorem thus accounts for the complete discharge without treating energy as transported only along the conducting wire. High resistance makes the quasistatic electric-field approximation and neglect of changing magnetic energy consistent.

Electromagnetic waves drive mobile charges in a conducting medium. Their current changes both the phase and attenuation of the wave. A description in terms of a real, frequency-independent refractive index is therefore generally insufficient: the material response and the propagation constant are complex and frequency dependent.

Use phasors proportional to $e^{i(kz-\omega t)}$, with $k=k^{\prime }+i{k}^{\prime \prime }$ and $k^{\prime \prime }\ge 0$ for a passive medium. In a homogeneous, isotropic, linear material, let ${ϵ}_b$ represent the permittivity associated with bound-charge electric polarization, $\mu$ the magnetic permeability and $\sigma (\omega )$ the mobile-charge conductivity. The macroscopic Maxwell equations giveFor a transverse plane wave, taking another curl yieldsThis division of the response avoids counting mobile electrons both in ${ϵ}_b$ and in $\sigma$. Define the complex refractive index $\tilde{n}=ck/\omega =n+i\kappa$. For a nonmagnetic medium, ${\tilde{n}}^2={ϵ}_{\mathrm{eff}}/{ϵ}_0$. Its real part determines the phase variation, while the positive optical extinction coefficient $\kappa$ gives amplitude attenuation $e^{-\omega \kappa z/c}$ and intensity attenuation $e^{-2\omega \kappa z/c}$. The amplitude penetration length is

A simple microscopic explanation comes from the Drude model. Let electrons of charge $-e$, mass $m$ and number density $n_e$ move against an effectively stationary positive background. Collisions relax their mean velocity at rate $\nu$:ConsequentlyWith a vacuum-like bound-charge background, this givesIts imaginary part is positive for positive $\omega ,\nu$, consistent with dissipation under the chosen phasor convention. Real materials can require an effective electron mass, a nontrivial bound-charge response, or additional absorption associated with the electronic band structure.

A plasma is a conducting ionized medium with mobile electrons and ions, approximately neutral on large scales because of plasma screening. For the electron-frequency transverse waves considered here, the heavy ions can often be treated as stationary. In a dilute weakly collisional plasma, $\nu \ll \omega$, soFor $\omega >{\omega }_p$, $k$ is real in this collisionless model and the wave propagates. Its phase velocity is $v_{\mathrm{ph}}=c/n>c$, while its group velocity is $v_g=cn<c$; their product is $c^2$. A phase crest exceeding $c$ does not imply superluminal information transport. For $\omega <{\omega }_p$, the refractive-index square is negative andThe transmitted field is evanescent rather than a traveling bulk wave. A sufficiently thick collisionless plasma reflects such radiation without Ohmic absorption. Collisions make the response complex and permit absorption. This accounts for a plasma cutoff and, qualitatively, the reflection of some radio frequencies by ionized atmospheric layers. The simple model describes transverse waves; plasmas also support longitudinal collective modes.

In a metal, positive ions usually form a crystal lattice. Mobile conduction electrons occupy states described by the electronic band structure and normally form a degenerate Fermi gas. The conduction-electron density is usually much higher than in a dilute gas plasma. Thus its plasma frequency is commonly in the optical or ultraviolet range, rather than the lower radio-frequency values possible in dilute plasmas. Electron scattering from the lattice, defects and other excitations gives a finite relaxation rate. The distinction is not that every plasma is collisionless and every metal collisional: the controlling ratio for either material is $\omega /\nu$, together with its carrier density and bound-charge response.

At sufficiently low frequency, $\omega \ll \nu$, the metal's conductivity is approximately real, ${\sigma }_0=n_e{e}^2/(m\nu )$. In a good conductor the conduction current dominates the displacement current, ${\sigma }_0\gg \omega {ϵ}_b$. The wave equation then givesFor example, a tangential electric field varies asThe current $\mathbf{J}={\sigma }_0\mathbf{E}$ is therefore concentrated within a few skin depths of the surface: this is the skin effect. As frequency increases within this regime, $\delta \propto {\omega }^{-1/2}$. In a wire whose radius greatly exceeds $\delta$, only a thin outer region carries appreciable alternating current, increasing the effective resistance. In a conducting shield, the same penetration suppresses the field transmitted through a sufficiently thick wall.

The Poynting theorem identifies the loss as Joule heating. The cycle-averaged heating density for a complex conductivity isThe wave impedance is $Z=\mu \omega /k$. For incidence from vacuum at normal incidence, the electric reflection amplitude is $r=(Z-Z_0)/(Z+Z_0)$, where $Z_0=\sqrt{{\mu }_0/{ϵ}_0}$. A good conductor has small $|Z|$ and therefore strong reflection, while the part of the incident power entering it is dissipated over the skin depth.

At high enough frequency that $\omega \gg \nu$, a metal's free-electron response also approaches the collisionless plasma form. The low-frequency formula $\delta \propto {\omega }^{-1/2}$ must not simply be extrapolated into that regime. Real optical behavior additionally depends on the electronic band structure and transitions between bands. Both plasmas and metals are therefore described by the same electromagnetic response framework, but their relevant densities, scattering rates and frequency regimes differ.

The Poynting theorem is the local energy balance of classical electromagnetism. For vacuum field laws, with current density $\mathbf{J}$, the electromagnetic energy per unit volume isandThus a decrease in local electromagnetic energy can supply outward energy flux or work on electric charge. The term $\mathbf{J}\cdot \mathbf{E}$ is power transferred to matter per unit volume. Its sign matters: positive values remove field energy, while negative values describe matter supplying the field. The magnetic part of the Lorentz force supplies no work term.

For a fixed volume $V$, the divergence theorem gives the directly measurable balanceFor example, $2.0\mathrm{W}$ entering a region with $0.50\mathrm{W}$ leaving and $1.20\mathrm{W}$ transferred to matter means stored electromagnetic energy increases at $0.30\mathrm{W}$. In source-free vacuum only the boundary flux changes the stored energy; a nonzero local Poynting vector can still have zero net closed-surface flux.

A brief proof takes the dot product of the Ampère-Maxwell equation with $\mathbf{E}/{\mu }_0$ and uses Faraday's law with $\mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0$. The identity $\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B})=\mathbf{B}\cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})-\mathbf{E}\cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{B})$ turns the remaining terms into the divergence of the Poynting vector. ^[ref].