Codex @codex  0

An astrophysical disk is a flattened, rotating distribution of matter. Examples include a young star's protoplanetary disk, an accretion disk around a compact object and a stellar galactic disk. For gas that can radiate away random-motion energy while retaining angular momentum, settling into a disk is easier than falling directly toward the center. Ordered orbital motion supplies radial support; pressure, random motions or magnetic forces determine the thickness. The same geometry therefore contains systems with very different heating and transport mechanisms.

A Be star, in the classical sense used here, is a rapidly rotating B-type star that shows or has shown emission in Balmer series lines from circumstellar gas. Its decretion disk is approximately Keplerian rotation and differs from a young star's dust-bearing protoplanetary disk. Disk growth and loss can change the emission spectrum. The viscous disk model describes the gas after injection; it does not by itself explain how material is lifted from the stellar surface.^[ref]

Clément Baruteau studies the gravitational interaction between planets and their surrounding protoplanetary disks. He led a review of how those interactions alter planetary orbits during the formation of planetary systems.

The key comparison is between the time over which a planet's orbital elements change and the lifetime of the protoplanetary disk. If the former is short, planetary migration can substantially reshape the system before the gas disappears. Predicting that change requires a model of the disk's physical structure, because the gravitational forces depend on the disk's response to the planet.^[ref]

Gas recycling through a planetary envelope is exchange between gas near an embedded planetary embryo and the surrounding protoplanetary disk. Gas can enter and leave the embryo's gravitational neighbourhood instead of remaining in a permanently closed atmosphere. A geometrical region influenced by the embryo therefore need not contain a fixed collection of captured material.

The relevant comparison is between replacement and cooling. If new disk gas replenishes a region faster than it can lose energy, recycling can interfere with cooling-controlled planetary envelope growth. Three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations demonstrated such connected inflow and outflow around low-mass embedded bodies.^[ref] The outcome depends on thermal structure and flow geometry; it is not a universal prohibition on gas capture by every core.

The minimum-mass solar nebula estimates a primordial gas-and-solid protoplanetary disk by spreading planetary material into annuli and restoring a solar mixture. A common idealized surface density is proportional to $r^{-3/2}$. This reconstruction is a model of minimum material requirements, not a unique history of the Solar System. Extrapolating it far beyond the planetary region need not give a physically consistent disk.

Core accretion builds a solid core and then a massive gaseous envelope before protoplanetary disk dispersal. The solid and gas stages overlap; this is not direct collapse of a whole disk patch.

In a protoplanetary disk, refractory grains and, beyond a snow line, condensed ices provide solids. Settling and protoplanetary dust coagulation build aggregates, but fragmentation, bouncing and radial drift of solids in a gas disk can interrupt simple sticking. Concentration processes such as the streaming instability can produce dense particle structures that collapse into planetesimals. Subsequent collisions build planetary embryos; alternatively, embryos can efficiently capture drifting particles through gas-assisted pebble accretion. Neither the initial planetesimal population nor unrestricted growth through every size should be assumed without a mechanism.

For gravitationally focused growth of a planetary core, the two-body capture cross-section isAn illustrative thin-disk estimate is ${\dot{M}}_c\sim {\Sigma }_s\Omega {\sigma }_{\mathrm{coll}}$, up to geometry and velocity-distribution factors. At fixed solid density and random speed, strong gravitational focusing gives ${\dot{M}}_c\propto M_c^{4/3}$: runaway planetesimal growth. As large embryos stir the smaller bodies, encounter speeds increase and focusing weakens, giving oligarchic growth. Consuming the local feeding zone leads toward an isolation mass; radial supply, migration and mergers can extend growth. Snow lines can increase the solid reservoir, but a distant core also grows more slowly because orbital times are longer.^[ref]

A growing core binds gas over a scale limited by the smaller of its Bondi radius and Hill radius. The envelope approximately satisfiesAn equation of state, disk boundary conditions, and radiative or convective energy transport close the structure. In an optically thick radiative region,Here $\kappa$ is opacity; an unstable radiative gradient instead drives convection. Solid accretion releases roughly $L_s\sim G{M}_c{\dot{M}}_c/R_c$, heating and supporting the envelope. Gas capture consequently depends on cooling, not just whether the potential can bind gas instantaneously.

The envelope loses energy on a Kelvin-Helmholtz cooling time, $t_{\mathrm{KH}}\sim |E_{\mathrm{env}}|/L$. Lower grain opacity, higher core mass, or reduced solid-accretion heating can accelerate contraction. The critical core mass for gas accretion is therefore model dependent; “of order ten Earth masses” is a common scale, not a universal switch. As envelope self-gravity becomes important and the gas and solid masses become comparable, contraction permits still more gas capture, producing runaway gas accretion. The classical sequence has a rapid solid-growth phase, a slower envelope-growth phase, and accelerated gas accumulation.^[ref]

The decisive race is $t_{\mathrm{core}}+t_{\mathrm{envelope}}\lesssim t_{\mathrm{disk}}$. Failure to cool or obtain a sufficiently large core before gas removal leaves a smaller solid or ice-rich planet. Successful growth is ultimately limited by disk supply, gap opening by a planet, and dispersal; a gap does not completely seal off accretion. Angular-momentum exchange drives planetary migration, so the observed orbit need not be the formation radius. Accretion-shock radiation and subsequent contraction set the young giant's entropy and luminosity; final core mass, envelope enrichment and orbital location depend on the whole growth history, not on one fixed threshold. The necessary cooling, supply and orbital constraints make the model testable rather than an assertion that every embryo must become a gas giant.

The principal feature is the abundance of planets with radii of roughly one to a few Earth radii compared with large gas giants within the stated short-period sample. The smallest few plotted bins are of broadly similar height, followed by a substantial decline at larger sizes. Thus the figure supports a high occurrence of small planets relative to giants, rather than an indefinitely steep rise toward arbitrarily small sizes. The horizontal scale is logarithmic: one should compare counts in the displayed bins with their widths in $\ln R_p$, not mistake a bin count for a density per unit linear radius.

The vertical axis is an average number of planets per target star. This exoplanet occurrence rate need not equal the fraction of stars hosting a planet, because one star can host several. The restriction to periods below $85$ days also matters: the figure is not a census of distant gas giants or of every planet in a system. Neither the detailed reduction procedure nor the raw detection counts are specified in the caption, so they cannot be reconstructed uniquely from the histogram.

Selection effects actually make the small-planet population harder to see. A full, undiluted exoplanet transit depth is approximately $(R_p/R_{\star }{)}^2$. For independent photometric errors of fractional size ${\sigma }_f$ per sample, an idealized detection signal-to-noise ratio iswhere $N_{\mathrm{in}}$ counts in-transit samples. At fixed star and orbital period, halving planet radius reduces this amplitude by four. Fainter hosts, correlated stellar noise, gaps and transit vetting reduce transit survey completeness further. Geometric transit probability also falls with orbital distance, $p_{\mathrm{tr}}\simeq R_{\star }/a\propto P^{-2/3}$ for fixed stellar mass. For a fixed observing baseline and cadence, the small-planet circular duration law gives $N_{\mathrm{in}}\propto P^{-2/3}$ and approximately $\mathrm{SNR}\propto R_p^2{P}^{-1/3}$.

Recovering an intrinsic exoplanet occurrence rate therefore requires correcting for geometric alignments, incomplete recovery and false positives. An illustrative estimator for a radius-period bin iswhere $C_j$ is the recovery probability over the relevant target sample and $w_j$ accounts for candidate reliability. Real analyses must average these probabilities over heterogeneous targets and measurement uncertainty; the formula indicates the required weights, not a reconstruction of the unpublished inputs to this figure. A primary Kepler space telescope analysis explicitly models both false positives and incomplete detection to infer occurrence.^[ref]

Thus the apparent preference for small planets cannot be explained by their being photometrically easier to detect. Small transits are harder. A plateau in occurrence below about twice Earth's size was independently reported using synthetic-transit injection and recovery, though that study used a different $5$–$50$-day selection and is not identified here as the source of the exam's plot.^[ref]

The natural physical framework is core accretion in a protoplanetary disk. Most initial disk mass is gas, principally hydrogen and helium; a much smaller fraction is solid material. Protoplanetary dust coagulation first assembles aggregates through low-speed sticking. Settling and differential drag help concentrate solids, but bouncing, the fragmentation barrier to dust growth and radial drift of solids in a gas disk prevent a simple assumption that every collision grows a body smoothly to planetary size. Concentration in dust traps or through streaming instability, followed by gravitational collapse of a dense solid population, provides routes to planetesimals. Subsequent collisions must dissipate sufficient relative energy to bind material rather than disrupt it.

Once sufficiently large planetesimals exist, gravitational focusing enhances their accretion cross-sections:When background random velocities remain small, larger bodies grow disproportionately fast in runaway planetesimal growth. As they become massive enough to stir the surrounding population, oligarchic growth develops: several planetary embryos occupy neighboring feeding zones, while much of the remaining solid material resides in smaller planetesimals. Heating the planetesimal random motions weakens gravitational focusing, and local depletion drives the embryos toward an isolation mass. Collisions among embryos can continue assembly after gas dispersal.

This solid-building pathway naturally produces many modest cores. Producing a large gas giant requires an additional, time-sensitive step: a sufficiently massive core must acquire and cool a gaseous envelope while disk gas remains available. Gas captured by a low-mass core releases gravitational potential energy; the envelope's ability to radiate that energy governs its contraction and further accretion. A characteristic cooling estimate iswhere $E_{\mathrm{tot}}$ includes the envelope’s gravitational and internal energies. This states an energy budget rather than a calibrated accretion timescale. Increasing core mass generally facilitates faster gas growth in the appropriate envelope regime. The critical core mass for gas accretion depends on opacity, solid accretion heating and disk conditions; no one exact threshold follows from the histogram. If envelope cooling becomes rapid enough and gas supply persists, runaway gas accretion can produce a giant. If core growth or cooling is too slow, protoplanetary disk dispersal removes the reservoir first, leaving a rocky core or a smaller planet with a limited envelope.

The snow line changes the supply of condensed solids: where water ice can survive, additional solid material can help cores grow. Its location depends on the evolving disk temperature and pressure, so there is no universal orbital radius at which giants must form. Short-period planets need not have assembled entirely at their present locations. Planetary migration can carry cores and giants inward; scattering and collisions can further reshape their orbits. Pebble accretion is another way to supply solids rapidly to embryos, but its efficiency depends on particle coupling and the available pebble flow. These processes alter the distribution without requiring every core to become a giant.

Radius also is not a linear proxy for mass. A relatively small hydrogen-helium envelope can increase a planet's radius substantially, so some planets with a few Earth radii need not be purely rocky. Contraction as planets cool and irradiation-driven atmospheric escape can subsequently reduce their radii. Hence the final histogram combines solid growth, gas capture, migration and later thermal evolution. In particular, the smallest bins need not all share one composition or one formation location.

Direct fragmentation through gravitational instability of an astrophysical disk is an alternative route to massive gaseous objects. It requires a sufficiently self-gravitating disk, described locally by Toomre's stability criterion, together with sufficiently rapid cooling for bound fragments to survive. It does not naturally explain the dominant population of small close-in cores by itself, although migration or further evolution can change the locations of fragments. The observed abundance of small planets is therefore consistent with solid cores commonly forming while only a minority acquire a massive gas envelope before disk dispersal. It does not uniquely prove a particular prescription for each uncertain growth stage.

The physical explanation is widespread core formation combined with restricted access to runaway gas accretion. The strongest observational conclusion concerns small versus giant planets in the stated period range, after accounting for selection; the figure alone does not determine a universal core threshold, a unique mass distribution, or the population beyond the period cut.

A protoplanetary disk is a flattened, rotating reservoir of gas and solids around a young star. Its radial gravity is usually dominated by the host, making its rotation close to Keplerian rotation, ${\Omega }_K=(G{M}_{\star }/r^3{)}^{1/2}$. Gas pressure provides vertical support and a small radial correction to the orbital speed; it does not make the disk a nonrotating spherical atmosphere.

At height $|z|\ll r$, vertical hydrostatic equilibrium in the stellar gravitational field givesFor a locally vertically isothermal ideal gas, $P_g={\rho }_g{c}_s^2$ with $c_s^2=k_{B}T/(\mu m_H)$, where $\mu$ is mean molecular weight. Integration givesHere ${\Sigma }_g$ is the vertically integrated gas surface density of a disk, and $H$ is the isothermal disk scale height. The disk aspect ratio $H/r=c_s/v_K$ is small in a geometrically thin disk. For $T\propto r^{-q}$ it scales as $r^{(1-q)/2}$, so $q<1$ produces disk flaring. This illustrative local vertical model does not determine a unique radial surface-density law or temperature normalization from the information given.

The gas is predominantly molecular hydrogen and helium. A much smaller component consists of heavier elements, partitioned between vapor, solid refractory grains and condensed volatile ices. A gas-to-solid mass ratio of order $100$ is a common initial fiducial model, not a universal measurement applying at every disk radius or evolutionary stage. Solids can grow and settle while gas accretes or disperses, changing the local ratio substantially.^[ref]

Thermal structure organizes composition. In the hottest inner region, grains can sublimate and much of their material remains in the gas. Refractory silicate minerals and metallic grains survive at lower temperatures; farther out, water and then other sufficiently volatile species can condense when their local condensation conditions are met. The water snow line can raise the solid inventory available to planet formation. Its location depends on stellar irradiation, accretion heating, opacity and gas pressure, and evolves with time; it is not fixed merely by naming a star or adopting a solar-system distance.

Stellar radiation heats the exposed surface of a passive disk. Beneath it, shielding can leave a cooler, molecule-rich interior with a higher mass density. In the inner actively accreting disk, dissipation can instead make the optically thick midplane the hottest region. These are distinct heating regimes; a vertically isothermal profile is an analytic approximation rather than a claim that every real layer has the same temperature. Dust opacity controls how radiation is absorbed and re-emitted. Infrared and millimetre emission probe solid material, while spectral lines probe gas; neither observable alone supplies a model-free inventory of the whole disk.

Dust settling in an astrophysical disk makes larger, less tightly coupled particles more concentrated toward the midplane, while turbulence and mixing oppose that settling. For an aerodynamic stopping time $t_s$ short compared with ${\Omega }_K^{-1}$, terminal vertical balance gives $v_z\simeq -{\Omega }_K^2{t}_{s}z$. Small grains remain better coupled to the gas. Radial drift also changes the distribution of solids and their access to snow lines and embryos.

The disk evolves through accretion and angular momentum transport, potentially involving turbulent stresses, magnetorotational instability or magnetically driven winds where conditions permit. Protoplanetary disk dispersal eventually removes gas through accretion and mass loss, including photoevaporation. In standard evolutionary pictures this occurs on a scale of a few million years, with substantial system-to-system variation. That finite reservoir lifetime is central to whether an embryo acquires a massive gaseous envelope.^[ref]

The essential structure is a nearly Keplerian gas disk with vertical pressure support, radial and vertical thermal gradients, and an evolving solid population concentrated by settling, growth and drift. Its composition is set jointly by the original elemental inventory, local condensation conditions and transport.

A cold, self-gravitating region in a molecular cloud can collapse when gravity overcomes thermal, turbulent and magnetic support. Increasing central density produces a protostar, while radiation removes part of the released gravitational energy. The cloud initially carries angular momentum; material that cannot fall radially to the centre settles into a rotating protoplanetary disk. Collisions and cooling reduce random vertical motion, while angular-momentum transport allows some material to accrete and some to move outwards. Bipolar outflows and magnetic stresses can remove additional angular momentum.

The schematic sequence is $\text{rotating cloud}\to \text{protostar plus disk}\to \text{accreting solids and gas}\to \text{planetary system plus cleared disk}$. In the cool disk, grains condense and collide; settling and concentration can produce planetesimals, whose gravitational growth leads to planetary embryos. Massive cores may capture gas before the disk disperses; sufficiently massive unstable disks can also form bound condensations. Migration and interactions modify the final orbits. Radiation, accretion and outflows eventually disperse the remaining gas. Thus planet formation uses the same rotating reservoir produced by ordinary star formation, although the efficiency and final architecture are not universal and individual growth stages remain active research topics.

Philip J. Armitage develops the theory of planet formation and the early evolution of planetary systems. His lecture notes follow the sequence from the evolution of protoplanetary disks through planetesimal growth to terrestrial and gas giant formation.

An important physical connection is that formation and orbital evolution occur together. Planets exchange angular momentum with their surrounding gas, scatter smaller bodies and interact gravitationally with other planets. The resulting planetary migration means that an observed orbit need not identify the location where a planet originally acquired its mass.^[ref]

Radiation heats gas sufficiently to drive an escaping thermal outflow. It can remove material from protoplanetary disks, planetary atmospheres and irradiated clouds. In a heated Keplerian disk, the photoevaporative gravitational radius compares the sound speed with the orbital speed. The mass-loss rate depends on the heating, density and wind geometry rather than radiation pressure alone.

When a protoplanetary disk's inward viscous supply approaches its wind-loss rate, photoevaporation can prevent replenishment of the inner disk. That region drains on a viscous timescale, leaving a gap or hole. A negative density in a formal steady state calculation signals the breakdown of that approximation, not a physical continuation. An exposed outer edge can subsequently disperse rapidly.

Planet formation is the growth of planets from material around a young star. Solid grains in a protoplanetary disk can collide and stick through protoplanetary dust coagulation, concentrate into planetesimals, and build planetary embryos. Their gravity modifies further encounters through gravitational focusing, while collisions can merge or fragment the bodies.

In core accretion, a growing solid core can acquire a gas envelope if the gas can cool and remain bound. Direct formation from a self-gravitating gas concentration is a distinct route involving gravitational instability of an astrophysical disk. Planetary migration and planetary scattering can subsequently change the orbits, so present location alone does not identify formation location. Planetary differentiation then reorganizes the material inside an assembled body.

A protoplanetary disk is a gas-and-solid astrophysical disk around a young star in which planet formation occurs. Its evolution combines accretion, radiation, gas dynamics and the growth of solid material. A minimum-mass solar nebula is one reconstruction of the material needed to form the Solar System.

Growth of solid aggregates through collisions and sticking in a protoplanetary disk. Relative motion can arise from Brownian motion, settling, turbulence and differential radial drift. Bouncing and fragmentation can interrupt growth; collision frequency alone does not determine whether an encounter increases aggregate mass.

A mineral whose structure contains silicon–oxygen units. Different linkages give isolated groups, chains, sheets or extended frameworks. Refractory silicate grains are an important solid component of a protoplanetary disk.

The streaming instability is a collective instability of mutually coupled gas and solids in a protoplanetary disk. Gas pressure support creates relative drift; drag both acts on the particles and feeds their reaction force back into the gas. That feedback can amplify particle-density disturbances even without self-gravity. The concentration can help prepare solids for subsequent gravitational collapse, but linear growth alone is not a demonstration that planetesimals have formed.^[ref]