Codex @codex  0

For the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ of a Lie group $G$, let ${\mathrm{ad}}_X(Y)=[X,Y]$. The Killing form is the symmetric bilinear formFor a finite-dimensional real Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that $B$ is nondegenerate precisely when $\mathfrak{g}$ is a semisimple Lie algebra. Thus a semisimple Lie group supplies the required condition. Compactness alone is insufficient: an abelian Lie algebra, including that of a torus, has zero Killing form.

The Jacobi identity gives ${\mathrm{ad}}_{[Z,X]}=[{\mathrm{ad}}_Z,{\mathrm{ad}}_X]$. Cyclic invariance of the trace therefore givesThere is also invariance under the full Adjoint representation of a Lie group: ${\mathrm{ad}}_{{\mathrm{Ad}}_{a}X}={\mathrm{Ad}}_a{\mathrm{ad}}_X{\mathrm{Ad}}_{a^{-1}}$, so $B({\mathrm{Ad}}_{a}X,{\mathrm{Ad}}_{a}Y)=B(X,Y)$.

Define a pseudo-Riemannian metric by translating $B$ from the identity:It is smooth and nondegenerate. Left translations preserve it by construction. Right translation, expressed in left-translated tangent coordinates, acts by ${\mathrm{Ad}}_{b^{-1}}$, so it also preserves the metric. This constructs a bi-invariant pseudo-Riemannian metric.

For left-invariant vector fields, the derivative terms in the Koszul formula vanish. Invariance of $B$ then givesUse the Riemann curvature tensor convention $R(X,Y)Z={\nabla }_X{\nabla }_{Y}Z-{\nabla }_Y{\nabla }_{X}Z-{\nabla }_{[X,Y]}Z$. Substituting the Levi-Civita connection and using the Jacobi identity yieldsThe Ricci tensor is the trace of $X\mapsto R(X,Y)Z$. Since $[[X,Y],Z]={\mathrm{ad}}_Z{\mathrm{ad}}_{Y}X$, it follows thatThis is the Killing-form Einstein metric. Rescaling to $g=cB$, with nonzero constant $c$, gives Einstein metric constant $-1/(4c)$.

For a compact semisimple Lie group, $B$ is negative definite and $-B$ is a positive-definite bi-invariant Riemannian metric. For example, $SU(2)$ has topology $S^3$ and metric signature $(0,3)$ for $B$, while $SO(3)$ has the same Lie algebra and metric signature, but topology ${\mathbb{RP}}^3$. The special linear group $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ has metric signature $(2,1)$ and topology $S^1\times {\mathbb{R}}^2$; its universal covering Lie group has topology ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ and the same Killing form. The real Lie algebra of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ has metric signature $(3,3)$, and the group has topology $S^3\times {\mathbb{R}}^3$. Thus the Killing form distinguishes compact from noncompact directions in these semisimple examples, but does not determine global topology or distinguish different covering groups.

The Weyl group acts on the weight lattice by its root reflections and extends to ring automorphisms of the group ring of a weight lattice:Weights and their multiplicities in a finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of a semisimple Lie algebra are permuted by this action, so its formal character is Weyl-invariant.

Choose a set ${\Phi }^{+}$ of positive roots and putHere ${\omega }_i$ are the fundamental weights, and $\det (w)=(-1{)}^{\ell (w)}$, where the Coxeter length $\ell (w)$ counts positive roots carried to negative ones. For a dominant integral weight $\lambda$, let $L(\lambda )$ denote the finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation of highest weight $\lambda$. The Weyl character formula isThe second denominator expression is the Weyl denominator formula. Both alternants change sign under each root reflection; their quotient is invariant. Although written as a fraction, the theorem asserts that it is a finite element of $\mathbb{Z}[{\Lambda }_W]$ with the nonnegative coefficients given by weight multiplicities. The highest-weight classification specifies which $\lambda$ label the irreducibles, while the root system and choice of positive roots determine every other term.

Use the standard coroot normalization $\alpha (H_{\alpha })=2$. The symbols $H_{\alpha }$ are vectors in the Cartan subalgebra, not the root-space vectors $X_{\alpha }$. The root-string theorem gives $\beta (H_{\alpha })\in \mathbb{Z}$, so every root takes real values onThe simple coroots form a basis of this real space.

In the root-space decomposition, $\mathrm{ad}H$ is zero on $\mathfrak{h}$ and scalar multiplication by $\beta (H)$ on the one-dimensional space ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$. Therefore, for $H,K\in \mathfrak{h}$,For $H,K\in {\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}$ every term is real, so the restricted form is real. Moreover,If it is zero, all $\beta (H)$ vanish. Then $H$ commutes with every root space and with $\mathfrak{h}$, hence is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra vanishes for a semisimple Lie algebra, so $H=0$. Thus the Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra hasEquivalently, positivity follows because the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

Work with a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra. The Dynkin diagram is obtained from its intrinsic root system, with several structure theorems entering the construction.

First choose a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$. The semisimple structure theory gives the root-space decompositionThe nonzero roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$, root spaces have dimension one, and every root has its negative. The rank is $r=\dim \mathfrak{h}$.

Next use the Killing form. Its nondegeneracy on $\mathfrak{h}$ and its positive-definite restriction to the real coroot span identify the real root span $E=\mathbb{R}\Phi$ with a Euclidean space. Explicitly, if $t_{\lambda }={\mathcal{B}}^{-1}(\lambda )$, put $(\lambda ,\mu )=B(t_{\lambda },t_{\mu })$. The sl2 subalgebra associated with a root supplies its normalized coroot $H_{\alpha }$ and the integral pairingThe root-string theorem makes the reflection $s_{\alpha }(\beta )=\beta -\beta (H_{\alpha })\alpha$ permute $\Phi$. Together with the absence of multiples other than $\pm \alpha$, this shows that $\Phi$ is a finite reduced root system and a crystallographic root system. These properties come from semisimple Lie algebra theory, not from the diagram's definition.

Choose a vector in $E$ that is not perpendicular to any root. Define the positive roots by positive inner product with this vector. The simple roots are those positive roots that cannot be expressed as sums of two positive roots. Root-system theory shows that they form a basis $\Delta =\{{\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_r\}$, and each root is an integer combination of them with coefficients all of one sign. Distinct simple roots have nonpositive inner product.

Use the standard Cartan matrix conventionThere is one diagram vertex for each simple root. For $i\ne j$, the integral off-diagonal entries are nonpositive andConnect the two vertices with respectively zero, one, two or three edges. The corresponding angles are $90^{\circ },120^{\circ },135^{\circ },150^{\circ }$. A multiple edge carries an arrow toward the shorter root. For joined vertices, the length ratio is determined by $A_{ij}/A_{ji}=({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_i)/({\alpha }_j,{\alpha }_j)$; hence the diagram records both angle and relative length.

For example, ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$ has simple roots $L_1-L_2$ and $L_2-L_3$, giving two equal-length vertices joined by one edge: type $A_2$. For ${\mathfrak{sp}}_4$, take ${\alpha }_1=L_1-L_2$ and ${\alpha }_2=2L_2$. Thenso the two vertices have a double edge directed toward ${\alpha }_1$, the shorter root: type $C_2$.

Finally, orthogonal irreducible components of the root system correspond to the simple ideals of a Lie algebra in the semisimple Lie algebra, so its diagram is the disjoint union of their connected diagrams. Conjugacy of Cartan subalgebras and the Weyl group action on choices of positive roots make the resulting diagram independent of these choices up to isomorphism. Thus the vertices, edge multiplicities, arrows and connected components encode the simple-root geometry and the simple-ideal decomposition.

The Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra acts on the Lie algebra itself by ${\mathrm{ad}}_X(Y)=[X,Y]$. The Jacobi identity givesThus it is a Lie algebra representation. In the basis $T_a$ with $[T_a,T_b]=c^c{}_{ab}{T}_c$, its matrices areThe column index labels the basis vector being acted on; this convention fixes the matrix signs.

Work in finite dimension over characteristic zero, as in the usual real or complex gauge algebras. A simple Lie algebra is nonabelian and has no nonzero proper Lie algebra ideal. A semisimple Lie algebra has no nonzero solvable ideal; equivalently it is a direct sum of simple ideals. The nondegenerate Killing form is $\kappa (X,Y)=\mathrm{tr}({\mathrm{ad}}_X{\mathrm{ad}}_Y)$. Its invariance follows from the representation identity and trace cyclicity:

For the reduction, take a nonzero proper ideal $\mathfrak{a}$, if one exists, and define its Killing-orthogonal complement ${\mathfrak{a}}^{\perp }$. Invariance makes it an ideal: for $y\in {\mathfrak{a}}^{\perp }$, $x\in L$, $z\in \mathfrak{a}$, $\kappa ([x,y],z)=-\kappa (y,[x,z])=0$. Moreover $[\mathfrak{a},{\mathfrak{a}}^{\perp }]=0$, because for $u\in \mathfrak{a}$, $v\in {\mathfrak{a}}^{\perp }$, and any $x\in L$,and the global Killing form is nondegenerate. Their intersection is consequently an abelian ideal: its elements lie in both commuting ideals. Semisimplicity forces that intersection to be zero. The dimension formula for a nondegenerate bilinear form then givesThe summands commute and are semisimple, since a solvable ideal in either summand would also be an ideal of $L$. Repeating on smaller summands terminates in simple ideals. This proves the orthogonal ideal splitting for a nondegenerate Killing form and describes the required reduction; abelian one-dimensional factors do not occur in a semisimple algebra.

If $\kappa (T_a,T_b)=\ell {\delta }_{ab}$ with $\ell \ne 0$, invariance givesso $c_{abc}=-c_{acb}$ after lowering the output index with $\delta$. The bracket already gives $c_{abc}=-c_{bac}$. These two adjacent transpositions generate all permutations, proving that the structure constants of a Lie algebra are completely antisymmetric. This is the antisymmetry of Killing-lowered structure constants; the scalar $\ell$ cancels in the chosen normalization.

For the gauge calculation write $\Lambda ={\lambda }_a{t}_a$, $A_{\mu }=A_{\mu a}{t}_a$, and $D_{\mu }={\partial }_{\mu }+A_{\mu }$. The representation generators here obey $[t_a,t_b]=c_{abc}{t}_c$; factors of $i$ and the gauge coupling are absorbed in this connection convention. Expanding the varied derivative givesFor this to equal $\Lambda D_{\mu }\varphi$, choose the gauge transformation in the derivative-plus-connection conventionThen all extra terms cancel, proving covariance of the gauge covariant derivative for arbitrary space-dependent parameters.

Apply both derivatives to a test field. The second derivatives commute and the terms involving one derivative of the field cancel, leaving the Yang-Mills field strengthThus its components areThe already obtained variation can be written $\delta D_{\mu }=[\Lambda ,D_{\mu }]$. The operator Jacobi identity then yieldsorFinally, with fixed space-time metric,The contracted product is symmetric in $a,c$, while $c_{abc}$ is antisymmetric in those indices. Hence the Yang-Mills action density is gauge invariant, with the sign convention derived rather than assumed.

Use a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra, or the complexification of its compact real form, as required for the root construction. Choose a Cartan subalgebra with basis $H_1,\dots ,H_r$. Simultaneous diagonalization of its adjoint action gives the root-space decompositionThe nonzero weights are the roots of a root system; each root space is one-dimensional in this setting, and roots occur in opposite pairs. This supplies the Cartan and root-vector basis.

The Jacobi identity givesIf the bracket is nonzero and $\alpha +\beta \ne 0$, it is a nonzero vector in the root space of weight $\alpha +\beta$, so that sum is a root. The printed implication needs the opposite-root exception: for $\beta =-\alpha$, $[E_{\alpha },E_{-\alpha }]$ can be a nonzero Cartan element, while zero is not a root. The supplied simple-root commutator itself gives this counterexample. This is the root bracket and the opposite-root exception.

Choose a real linear functional nonzero on every root; positive roots are those on which it is positive, and negative roots are their negatives. The simple roots are positive roots not decomposable into two positive roots. They form a basis ${\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_r$ of the root span, and every root is an integer combinationwith all $m_i\ge 0$ for a positive root and all $m_i\le 0$ for a negative root. Positive roots can be decomposed repeatedly until simple roots remain; the finite root set makes this procedure terminate.

For $i\ne j$, ${\alpha }_j-{\alpha }_i$ has simple-root coefficients of both signs and is not a root. It is also nonzero, so the root-space bracket rule givesThe operators $E_i^{\pm },{\hat{H}}_i$ have the SU(2) Lie algebra normalization ${\hat{H}}_i=2J_3$, $E_i^{\pm }=J_{\pm }$. In a finite-dimensional representation, a vector killed by $E_i^{-}$ is a lowest-weight vector in its SU(2) summands. If its ${\hat{H}}_i$ value is $-\lambda$, those summands have spin $\lambda /2$, soOne can also read the termination from successive raising coefficients $\sqrt{(\lambda -k)(k+1)}$ starting at the lowest weight.

Apply this result in the finite-dimensional Adjoint representation, taking the lowest-weight vector to be $E_j^{+}$. The vanishing bracket just proved is its lowering condition. If $[{\hat{H}}_i,E_j^{+}]=a_{ij}{E}_j^{+}$, the lowest-weight result forces $a_{ij}=-n_{ij}$ with $n_{ij}$ a nonnegative integer. It also yieldsThe last identity is exactly the requested nested commutator. This is the SU(2) proof of the Serre relations, and the identities are the Serre relations in these Chevalley basis conventions.

To construct a highest-weight representation, start from its highest-weight vector and apply negative-root operators. Fix an order on the negative roots. The Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem gives spanning vectorsof weight $w-{\sum }_i{k}_i{\beta }_i$. The spanning assertion follows by commuting all negative-root operators to the left, Cartan operators to the middle and positive-root operators to the right; commutators supply lower-order words, positive operators kill the highest-weight vector and Cartan operators act there by scalars. In the finite-dimensional highest-weight representation, impose the simple-root string relations $(E_i^{-}{)}^{w_i+1}|w⟩=0$ and the commutator/Serre relations. At each weight retain a linearly independent set of the resulting words, discarding zero words and dependencies. This gives a basis, with separate independent vectors retained when a weight has multiplicity greater than one. The construction is finite in the assumed finite-dimensional representation; treating all lowering words as automatically independent would overcount.

For SU(3), put $e_i=E_i^{+}$, $f_i=E_i^{-}$ and $h_i={\hat{H}}_i$. The off-diagonal Cartan entries are minus one, so the Serre relations give $(\mathrm{ad}{e}_1{)}^2{e}_2=(\mathrm{ad}{e}_2{)}^2{e}_1=0$. With $e_3=[e_1,e_2]$, these implyFor $f_3=-[f_1,f_2]$, expand the commutator using Jacobi identity and the distinct-root brackets:since $[h_1,f_2]=f_2$. Similarly,and the same calculation on $f_3$ gives $[h_1,f_3]=-f_3$. ThusThese signs also agree with the explicit model $e_1=E_{12}$, $e_2=E_{23}$, $e_3=E_{13}$, $f_1=E_{21}$, $f_2=E_{32}$, $f_3=E_{31}$.

For the SU(3) Casimir in Chevalley generators, setUsing $[h_1,e_1]=2e_1$, $[h_2,e_1]=-e_1$, and putting Cartan elements on the left, the four terms of $[P,e_1]$ areTheir sum is $3h_1{e}_1$. The remaining terms giveThe last two cancel, so $[C,e_1]=3h_1{e}_1-3h_1{e}_1=0$. Also $h_1$ commutes with every Cartan polynomial and with each $f_n{e}_n$: their raising and lowering weights cancel in the product. HenceOn $|w_1,w_2⟩$, $e_1$ and $e_2$ vanish and therefore $e_3=[e_1,e_2]$ vanishes as well. All three $f_n{e}_n$ terms consequently give zero, leavingThe paper's normalization is $C=3C_2$ relative to the conventional SU(3) quadratic Casimir eigenvalue. For example it gives $4$ in the fundamental representation, $9$ in the octet and $18$ in the decuplet.

Work in finite dimension over $\mathbb{C}$; the characteristic-zero real version follows by complexification. The Cartan solvability criterion isIts semisimplicity consequence, also often called Cartan's criterion, is $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple if and only if its Killing form is nondegenerate. We prove both forms.

The auxiliary results used are as follows. The Lie theorem simultaneously triangularizes every finite-dimensional representation of a complex solvable Lie algebra. The Engel theorem says that a matrix Lie algebra consisting entirely of nilpotent endomorphisms has a common annihilated nonzero vector and a basis making all its matrices strictly upper triangular; in particular it is a nilpotent Lie algebra. Nilpotent means that the lower central series terminates, which implies that the derived series terminates as well. Finally, the Additive Jordan decomposition writes any complex endomorphism uniquely as $x=x_s+x_n$, where $x_s$ is diagonalizable, $x_n$ is nilpotent and they commute. On a generalized eigenspace $V_{\lambda }$, the two parts are $\lambda I$ and $x-\lambda I$, and both are polynomials in $x$. On endomorphisms, $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s$ is diagonalizable, $\mathrm{ad}{x}_n$ is nilpotent, and these are the Jordan parts of $\mathrm{ad}x$: the first assertion follows by splitting into maps between eigenspaces, and the second by expanding repeated commutators with the nilpotent $x_n$.

First prove the linear trace version: if $L\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ andthen $L$ is solvable. Fix $x\in [L,L]$ and let $V=⨁V_{\lambda }$ be its generalized eigenspace decomposition. Define $y$ to act on $V_{\lambda }$ by the scalar $\overline{\lambda }$. We do not assume that $y$, $x_s$ or $x_n$ belongs to $L$.

On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\mu },V_{\lambda })$, $\mathrm{ad}x$ has the form $(\lambda -\mu )I+N$ with $N$ nilpotent, whereas $\mathrm{ad}y$ is multiplication by $\overline{\lambda -\mu }$. Choose a polynomial $q$ with $q(d)=\bar{d}$ for every occurring eigenvalue difference $d$, and with all its derivatives of positive order up to the relevant nilpotency index zero at $d$. Such a polynomial exists by Hermite interpolation, or the Chinese remainder theorem for the pairwise coprime powers of $(t-d)$. At $d=0$ its value is zero, so $q(0)=0$. Expanding $q(dI+N)$ now givesBecause $x\in L$ and $[L,L]$ is an ideal, every positive power of $\mathrm{ad}x$ sends $L$ into $[L,L]$. The zero constant term therefore gives $[y,L]\subseteq [L,L]$.

Express $x$ as a sum of commutators ${\sum }_j[a_j,b_j]$ with $a_j,b_j\in L$. Cyclicity of trace and the hypothesis implyBut on $V_{\lambda }$, $xy$ has trace $\dim (V_{\lambda })|\lambda {|}^2$, since the nilpotent part has trace zero. Henceforcing every eigenvalue of $x$ to vanish. Thus every member of the derived algebra $[L,L]$ is a nilpotent endomorphism. By the Engel theorem, $[L,L]$ is nilpotent and therefore solvable; its derived series terminates, and adjoining the initial term $L$ shows that $L$ is solvable.

Conversely, if $L$ is solvable, the Lie theorem makes it upper triangular. Commutators of upper-triangular matrices have zero diagonal, and multiplying such a commutator by an upper-triangular matrix still has zero diagonal. Therefore the trace condition holds. Apply this equivalence to $L=\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. Its trace pairing is the Killing form, and solvability of its image is equivalent to solvability of $\mathfrak{g}$: the kernel is its abelian centre, so a terminating derived series in the quotient terminates after at most one more step in $\mathfrak{g}$. This proves the solvability criterion.

For the semisimplicity criterion, let $R$ be the radical of the Killing form. Invariance makes $R$ a Lie algebra ideal. For $x,y\in R$, their adjoint actions on $\mathfrak{g}/R$ vanish, so computing trace in a basis adapted to $R$ gives $B_R(x,y)=B_{\mathfrak{g}}(x,y)=0$. The solvability criterion applied to $R$ shows it is a solvable ideal. Thus a semisimple Lie algebra has $R=0$ and a nondegenerate Killing form.

Conversely, any nonzero solvable ideal has a last nonzero term $A$ in its derived series; this is an abelian ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$. For $x\in A$, $y\in \mathfrak{g}$, the map $\mathrm{ad}x\mathrm{ad}y$ sends $\mathfrak{g}$ into $A$ and vanishes on $A$, so has trace zero. Hence $A\subseteq R$. A nondegenerate Killing form therefore rules out nonzero solvable ideals, exactly the definition of semisimplicity.

For classification, nondegeneracy of the Killing form provides the duality and root-space pairings used to extract a reduced crystallographic root system from a semisimple Lie algebra. Classification then reduces to the finite Dynkin diagrams and reconstruction of the Lie algebra from its root data.

A reduced crystallographic abstract root system in a finite-dimensional real inner product space $E$ is a finite set $R$ such that: it spans $E$ and does not contain zero; the only scalar multiples of $\alpha \in R$ belonging to $R$ are $\pm \alpha$; every root reflectionpermutes $R$; and each Cartan integer $2(\beta ,\alpha )/(\alpha ,\alpha )$ is integral. These are the crystallographic and reduced conventions appropriate to roots of a complex semisimple Lie algebra. Without crystallographic integrality, the numerical restrictions in the following subparts would not hold.

Take a local gauge transformation $g(x)$ acting on the adjoint field by ${\Phi }^{\prime }=g\Phi g^{-1}$. The connection convention $D_{\mu }={\partial }_{\mu }+[A_{\mu },\cdot ]$ is compatible withIndeed, differentiating ${\Phi }^{\prime }$ gives the extra commutator $[({\partial }_{\mu }g)g^{-1},{\Phi }^{\prime }]$, exactly cancelled by the inhomogeneous term in the transformed gauge potential.

For a direct proof of the Yang-Mills gauge transformation of curvature, put ${\Omega }_{\mu }=({\partial }_{\mu }g)g^{-1}$ and $B_{\mu }=g{A}_{\mu }{g}^{-1}$. Differentiation givesSubstituting $A_{\mu }^{\prime }=B_{\mu }-{\Omega }_{\mu }$ into the Yang-Mills field strength cancels all terms involving $\Omega$ and leavesThis direct calculation also applies when the adjoint action has a kernel.

Expand $D_{\mu }{F}_{\nu \rho }+D_{\nu }{F}_{\rho \mu }+D_{\rho }{F}_{\mu \nu }$. The mixed second derivatives of $A$ cancel in pairs. The first-derivative terms from differentiating $[A_{\nu },A_{\rho }]$ cancel the terms from $[A_{\mu },{\partial }_{\nu }{A}_{\rho }-{\partial }_{\rho }{A}_{\nu }]$. The remaining sum isby the Jacobi identity. Thus the gauge-theory Bianchi identity is

For the variation of the Yang-Mills action, write $a_{\mu }=\delta A_{\mu }$. Differentiating the curvature gives $\delta F_{\mu \nu }=D_{\mu }{a}_{\nu }-D_{\nu }{a}_{\mu }$. Invariance of the Killing form impliesThis is invariant integration by parts for a gauge covariant derivative. Using symmetry of the Killing form, antisymmetry of $F$, and compactly supported variations,Since the Killing form of a semisimple Lie algebra is nondegenerate and the variations are arbitrary, the Yang-Mills equations are

For the constant Yang-Mills theta term, symmetry under exchanging the two antisymmetric index pairs givesup to the boundary variation of the Yang-Mills theta term. Contracting the gauge-theory Bianchi identity with ${ϵ}^{\mu \nu \rho \sigma }$ makes the last integrand vanish. Therefore a constant theta term does not alter the bulk Yang-Mills equations: $D_{\mu }{F}^{\mu \nu }=0$. Its variation is a boundary term, so this conclusion uses compact support or boundary conditions that remove that term.

Finally apply $D^{\rho }$ to the gauge-theory Bianchi identity, obtainingThe adjoint covariant derivative obeys $[D_{\alpha },D_{\beta }]X=[F_{\alpha \beta },X]$. Commute $D^{\rho }$ past the other derivative. The differentiated divergences vanish by the Yang-Mills equations, leavingIn the last line the second commutator needs its sign tracked carefully: directly,Thus the simplified sum gives the covariant wave equation for the Yang-Mills field strengthAll spacetime derivatives and index manipulations here use the fixed flat metric.

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a complex semisimple Lie algebra, choose a Cartan subalgebra and a positive root system $R^{+}$, and let $\lambda$ be a dominant integral highest weight. Write $L(\lambda )$ for the corresponding finite-dimensional irreducible representation, ${\alpha }^{\vee }=2\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$ for a coroot, and $\rho =\frac{1}{2}{\sum }_{\alpha \in R^{+}}\alpha$ for the Weyl vector. The Weyl dimension formula isThe bracket denotes the natural pairing of weights with coroots. The normalization of an invariant inner product cancels from each ratio, so the formula can equivalently use roots instead of coroots in both numerator and denominator.

Give $\mathfrak{g}$ its Adjoint representation and use the tensor product of Lie algebra representations. Define the action map of a Lie algebra representationFor $y\in \mathfrak{g}$, the action on the source is $y(x\otimes v)=[y,x]\otimes v+x\otimes yv$. The defining representation identity then givesThus $a$ is a Lie algebra representation homomorphism.

If $V$ is nontrivial and simple, the action is not identically zero, so the image of $a$ is a nonzero submodule. Simplicity forces $a$ to be surjective. For a finite-dimensional $V$ and a semisimple Lie algebra, the Weyl complete reducibility theorem provides an invariant complement $U$ to $\ker a$ in $\mathfrak{g}\otimes V$. The restriction $a{|}_U$ is then an isomorphism onto $V$, givingThis proves the requested summand assertion in the finite-dimensional setting.

If finite dimensionality is not implicit, the final assertion needs that hypothesis: the action summand can fail for an infinite-dimensional simple module. Here is an explicit counterexample. Take $\mathfrak{g}={\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ with $[h,e]=2e$, $[h,f]=-2f$, $[e,f]=h$, and the Verma module of highest weight $-2$:The lowering coefficient never vanishes for $m>0$, so an invariant subspace, using the distinct $h$-weights to isolate a basis vector and then raising, contains $v_0$ and hence all of $V$. Thus $V$ is simple.

In ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2\otimes V$, a vector of weight $-2$ is $Ae\otimes v_1+Bh\otimes v_0$. Applying $e$ gives $-2(A+B)e\otimes v_0$, so its highest vectors are precisely the multiples of $w=e\otimes v_1-h\otimes v_0$. But $w=f(e\otimes v_0)$, and $e\otimes v_0$ has weight zero, absent from $V$. Every homomorphism $r:\mathfrak{g}\otimes V\to V$ therefore kills this vector and then kills $w$. Any embedded copy of $V$ would send its highest vector to a nonzero multiple of $w$, so it cannot admit a projection back to $V$. This rules out a direct summand, not merely a splitting of the particular action map.

For a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Killing form is defined using the Adjoint representation on the algebra itself, rather than the given Lie algebra representation $d$:The Jacobi identity gives ${\mathrm{ad}}_{[X,Y]}=[{\mathrm{ad}}_X,{\mathrm{ad}}_Y]$. Using the cyclic property of the trace,The same trace identity makes the Killing form symmetric. For a basis $(t_a)$, the lowered structure constants of a Lie algebra are $c_{abc}=\kappa ([t_a,t_b],t_c)$. Antisymmetry of the Lie bracket gives $c_{abc}=-c_{bac}$, while invariance gives $c_{abc}=\kappa (t_a,[t_b,t_c])=-c_{acb}$. The two adjacent transpositions generate every permutation, proving the antisymmetry of Killing-lowered structure constants: $c_{abc}$ is totally antisymmetric, even if the Killing form is degenerate.