Affine horizon-generator scaling Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
If a Killing horizon generator has constant nonzero surface gravity , write with affine. The equation implies , so shifting the affine origin gives .
Degenerate Killing horizon Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
A degenerate Killing horizon has zero surface gravity. In the radial quotient of an extremal black hole, a double horizon root produces a pole in the tortoise coordinate rather than the logarithm of a simple root. Such a horizon has no bifurcation surface of the usual nondegenerate type.
Extremal black hole 2026-10-05
An extremal black hole lies at the parameter bound where its inner and outer horizons coincide. Its surface gravity and hence its semiclassical Hawking temperature vanish.
Extremal Euclidean throat 2026-10-14
At a degenerate static horizon the Euclidean proper radial distance diverges logarithmically, so the horizon is an infinite end rather than a finite polar origin. Its time circle is not contracted at a conical tip, and local cone regularity imposes no finite period. The vanishing limiting surface gravity determines zero Hawking temperature; the simple-horizon periodicity argument must not be applied unchanged at the degenerate root.
Inner-horizon blueshift coordinate Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
Near a nondegenerate outgoing inner Cauchy horizon, a regular null coordinate behaves as , where is the magnitude of the inner-horizon surface gravity. Transforming stress components gives . Even a small power-law tail can therefore cause an unbounded locally measured flux, motivating mass inflation.
Kerr-Newman horizon temperature 2026-10-14
The outer-horizon surface gravity is . Hawking radiation or nondegenerate Euclidean black-hole regularity condition gives in units . The zero-temperature extremal value is the nonextremal limit; conical regularity alone does not fix a Euclidean period at a degenerate horizon.
Killing derivative contraction identity 2026-10-07
For a Killing vector field, set and . The Killing equation makes antisymmetric, and expansion of normalized three-index antisymmetrization gives the displayed identity. On a Killing horizon, hypersurface orthogonality removes its first right-hand term and relates to surface gravity.
Killing horizon Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-28
A Killing horizon is a null hypersurface whose null generators are orbits of a Killing vector field . On the horizon, defines its surface gravity.
Laws of black-hole mechanics 2026-09-28
The laws of black-hole mechanics relate surface gravity, horizon area, mass, angular momentum, and charge in close analogy with the laws of thermodynamics. Quantum theory identifies the analogy physically through Hawking temperature and Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.
Magnetically charged dilaton black hole 2026-10-05
The unit-coupling magnetic solution of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory has , magnetic potential , and dilaton , where and . Its physical asymptotic component has . For it has a regular Killing horizon at , area and surface gravity . Its asymptotic mass is . For the zero-area singularity is naked. The limiting case is singular and must not be treated as a regular nondegenerate horizon.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 69 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use and normalize the stationary time at infinity. For a regular stationary, asymptotically flat electrovacuum black hole, the Kerr-Newman metric hasInitially assume and , so the outer Killing horizon is nondegenerate. Its surface gravity, angular velocity, electric potential and area areThese are horizon quantities for the generator .
The laws of black-hole mechanics provide the first reason to regard and area as thermodynamic variables. The Zeroth law of black-hole mechanics makes constant on an equilibrium horizon. The first law for the Kerr-Newman family readsFor example, write the horizon relation as and use ; differentiating eliminates and to give this law. The last two terms are rotational and electric work. The classical second law of black-hole mechanics says that area cannot decrease under the null energy condition and appropriate global horizon assumptions. The third law of black-hole mechanics concerns unattainability of a zero-surface-gravity regular horizon by a finite physical process.
This analogy alone does not determine the temperature scale: if entropy were , the first law would only give . The decisive input is quantum field theory in the collapsing or stationary background. In a collapse vacuum that is regular for freely falling observers, the late outgoing retarded time and a regular affine null coordinate satisfy the Hawking exponential ray mapAn outgoing mode therefore behaves as . Continuing this power through the horizon changes its amplitude by the factor . Its positive- and negative-frequency decomposition consequently has the thermal ratio of Hawking Bogoliubov coefficientsCombining that ratio with bosonic normalization gives a Planck occupation . The fermionic normalization instead gives the corresponding Fermi factor. Thus Hawking radiation fixesFor rotating charged modes, the horizon energy is , so the emission spectrum contains the same temperature with angular-momentum and charge chemical potentials. Exterior scattering supplies greybody factors; it changes the received flux, not the horizon temperature. Superradiant bosonic modes require the usual signed absorption factor, and a globally regular thermal bath need not exist throughout an asymptotically flat rotating exterior. The collapse-state emission argument is the relevant one.
A complementary check is the Euclidean black-hole regularity condition. The local corotating nondegenerate horizon geometry is Rindler-like:Smoothness at requires to have period . Imaginary-time periodicity is precisely inverse temperature, agreeing with the radiation calculation. Matching the resulting temperature to the first law fixes the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy to . The generalized second law then uses : the classical area theorem alone does not apply to the negative-energy quantum flux responsible for evaporation.
Substitution gives the Kerr-Newman horizon temperatureIt reduces to for a Schwarzschild black hole. The nonextremal limit towards gives zero temperature. At exact extremality the Euclidean horizon is degenerate, so the elementary conical-period argument does not itself fix a period; zero temperature here is the limiting semiclassical result. The reasoning assumes ordinary Einstein–Maxwell dynamics, a regular horizon, the stated normalization at infinity and a regime where quantum fields on a slowly evolving classical geometry are a useful approximation. The mechanical laws, radiation spectrum and Euclidean regularity agree under these assumptions, which is substantially stronger evidence than the classical analogy alone.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 72 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A horizon separates regions according to a specified causal, dynamical or geometrical criterion. The criterion must be stated: an event horizon, an apparent horizon, a Killing horizon and a Cauchy horizon answer different questions. Some horizons describe a black hole, others an observer's acceleration or the universe's expansion. A vanishing coordinate metric component alone does not establish any of these definitions.
In an asymptotically flat spacetime, choose the relevant future null infinity , the endpoint of escaping outgoing light rays. The black-hole region and its future event horizon areHere is the causal past. Events in cannot send a causal signal to the chosen infinity. This is a global definition: identifying the horizon requires the full future development, so a local measurement need not reveal whether an event lies on it. Smooth portions of an event horizon are null hypersurfaces generated by null geodesics. Generators may join at past caustics or crease sets, so the horizon need not be smooth everywhere. A past event horizon is defined by the time-reversed escape criterion; in the maximally extended Schwarzschild solution it bounds a white-hole region.
An observer-based definition replaces infinity by a future-inextendible worldline . Its future observer event horizon is the boundary of events that can signal to , conventionally . A past observer horizon similarly bounds events reachable from its past worldline. Such horizons depend on the observer and need not imply a black hole.
A Killing horizon is a null hypersurface to which a nonzero Killing vector field is normal. On it, is tangent to its null generators and satisfies . The surface gravity measures the failure of this Killing parameter to be an affine parameter; rescaling rescales . A degenerate Killing horizon has . Stationary black-hole horizons often are Killing horizons, whereas a general evolving event horizon need not have any Killing symmetry. The condition alone is insufficient: the null vector must also be normal to a null hypersurface.
The Schwarzschild spacetime illustrates several of these notions. In units , let . Its metric is , and is the future event horizon of the black-hole region in the appropriate extension. The apparent coordinate singularity disappears in Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, , :At this metric is regular and the normal is null. Future outgoing radial rays satisfy ; inside the horizon their areal radius decreases even on the outgoing family. The stationary Killing vector field generates the horizon with when normalized at infinity. The Kretschmann scalar is , finite at the horizon and divergent at . Thus the event horizon is not the curvature singularity. The photon sphere at , which supports circular null orbits, is also not the horizon.
Quasi-local horizon notions use null expansions. For a closed spacelike two-surface, choose future outgoing and ingoing null normals , with in signature . Each expansion is the logarithmic rate of its positive area element along the corresponding null normal. A future trapped surface has and : both future light fronts initially shrink. A marginally outer trapped surface has ; for the future black-hole type also require . On a chosen spacelike slice, the outer boundary of the future trapped region is an apparent horizon, ordinarily an outermost marginally outer trapped surface when regularity permits this characterization. It depends on the slice, and a slicing need not display an apparent horizon even when the global spacetime contains an event horizon.
For the Schwarzschild metric in ingoing coordinates choose and . The spherical null expansion in ingoing coordinates givesThe round spheres inside are future trapped, while is marginal. On standard horizon-penetrating slices its sections give the apparent horizon, coinciding with the stationary event and Killing horizon. This coincidence in a symmetric stationary example does not identify the notions in a general spacetime.
A trapping horizon is a hypersurface foliated by marginal surfaces. Its future outer type obeys , and . Unlike an event horizon, this can be diagnosed from local expansion data and their variation. The null energy condition explains its causal character. At a marginal surface, the Null Raychaudhuri equation, with the present curvature sign and vanishing null twist, givesin units . A possible nonaffinity term vanishes here because it is proportional to the zero expansion. Write a horizon evolution vector as . Preserving gives . Hence : the future outer horizon is spacelike or null. Its area expansion is . These conclusions use the outer condition and the energy condition, not merely marginality.
For the global event horizon, the future-complete horizon focusing proof of the area theorem uses the same Null Raychaudhuri equation. Under the null energy condition, a negative generator expansion forces a future caustic in finite affine parameter. Future completeness and the usual regularity or predictability assumptions exclude such a caustic on the future event-horizon boundary. Its generator expansion is therefore nonnegative and its classical area cannot decrease. These assumptions matter: this is not an unconditional result for every null surface or every matter model.
Rotating and charged solutions provide further distinctions. A nonextremal Kerr black hole has , with . Its outer Killing horizon is generated by , where , rather than by time translation alone. The ergosphere begins at the stationary-limit surface , whose radius is . Away from the axis this lies outside the event horizon: it forbids static observers but does not forbid escape to infinity. In Reissner-Nordstrom spacetime, the nonextremal radii are . The outer surface is an event horizon, whereas the inner surface is a Cauchy horizon in the exact analytic extension.
A Cauchy horizon concerns predictability from initial data. The future domain of dependence of a partial Cauchy surface consists of events for which every past-inextendible causal curve intersects . Its future Cauchy horizon isBeyond it, causal influences can arrive without meeting the specified initial surface; data on that surface no longer determine the solution there. This is distinct from the inability to send signals to infinity. The inner horizon of the exact charged black hole supplies an example, and the definition necessarily specifies which initial surface is being used.
Flat spacetime itself has acceleration horizons. In the right Rindler wedge, set and , with . The Minkowski spacetime metric becomes . The null boundaries and are Rindler horizons of the boost Killing flow. A uniformly accelerated observer cannot receive signals from one side of its future horizon, even though the curvature vanishes and inertial observers encounter no such boundary. These are observer and Killing horizons, not a black-hole event horizon defined using the full Minkowski null infinity.
In a spatially flat Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric with noncompact spatial sections, radial light rays have . The particle horizon measures how far signals could have travelled since the initial cosmic time; the cosmological event horizon measures how far signals emitted now could ever travel toward a comoving observer. Their comoving and proper radii areThe respective horizon is present only if its integral is finite. The event-horizon integral uses the actual future endpoint, often , so it is global and observer-dependent. For on , a finite particle horizon exists for , while a finite event horizon exists for . Neither integral is finite for . In the expanding flat patch of de Sitter spacetime, and the proper event-horizon radius is . The static form identifies it as a cosmological Killing horizon; its surface-gravity magnitude is with the central static time normalization.
Finally, the Hubble radius must not automatically be called an event horizon. For a flat expanding cosmology, the two future radial null expansions of a sphere of proper radius are . At the ingoing expansion vanishes, while outside it both expansions are positive: this is the cosmological marginal, past-trapped type rather than a future black-hole trapped surface. A dust universe with has such a Hubble sphere but no future event horizon. Global causal boundaries, slice-dependent trapped-surface boundaries, symmetry horizons and initial-data boundaries must therefore be distinguished, even when several coincide in a special example.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 73 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In a globally static region, choose the time coordinate along the future timelike Killing vector field . A positive-frequency solution of the Klein-Gordon equation has , with . Assume appropriate boundary conditions and a Cauchy surface so that the conserved Klein-Gordon inner product isFor a real scalar, take the negative-frequency modes to be . Choose a complete normalized basis withThe negative norm of the conjugate modes is crucial; this is not a positive-definite inner product on all classical solutions.
Promote the real Klein-Gordon field to the operatorThese canonical commutation relations implement the canonical field and conjugate-momentum commutator. The static vacuum state in a stationary spacetime satisfies , and the Hamiltonian is a sum of oscillators, before zero-point regularization. Continuous labels replace sums by correctly normalized integrals. For a complex charged scalar there are separate particle and antiparticle oscillators, with the same mode-mixing argument in each sector.
Choose independently normalized past and future bases, and use the matrix indices of the question. Complex conjugation of the future positive-frequency expansion immediately givesConservation of the Klein-Gordon inner product gives and in this column-index convention. These ensure preservation of the canonical commutation relations.
Let annihilate past modes and annihilate future modes. Extracting the future coefficient from the field gives the Bogoliubov transformationThe minus sign follows from . In the in-vacuum, only contributes to the expectation of the future number operator. ThereforeThis is particle number from Bogoliubov coefficients: the intervening time-dependent geometry makes a past positive-frequency mode contain a future negative-frequency component. In infinite volume, localized wave packets avoid delta-function normalization artifacts; a common Fock-space implementation needs the usual square-summability condition on the creation-mixing coefficients.
For gravitational collapse, the initial vacuum can be defined before the hole forms, while late outgoing modes are defined using the asymptotic stationary time at future null infinity. The complete future basis also includes modes falling through the event horizon; exterior outgoing modes alone are not a complete basis of all propagated data. Tracing an outgoing mode backwards near a nonextremal horizon gives the exponential ray relation , where is late retarded time and is the surface gravity. An outgoing factor becomes proportional to in the early advanced coordinate, and contains both frequency signs when Fourier decomposed there. Their squared Bogoliubov-coefficient ratio is ; the canonical normalization then gives a Bose factor , multiplied by the greybody factor, the transmission probability through the exterior potential. Thus Hawking radiation has temperature in units , with greybody factor modifications to the spectrum. This is a free-field calculation on a fixed or slowly evolving background; eventual backreaction is an additional problem, and the nonextremal exponential map must not be blindly used when .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 73 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take and use . The case is flat spacetime and is not a black hole. In the nontrivial extremal Reissner-Nordstrom metric,The horizon is a double zero at , with surface gravity . The function is positive on both sides of the horizon. Thus the intermediate nonstatic region of a nonextremal charged hole disappears; one must not draw that region as a strip of nonzero width in the extremal Penrose diagram.
To construct the Penrose diagram, first integrate the radial tortoise coordinate:The additive constant has been chosen so that in the inner block. In the exterior, at and at infinity. In the inner static region , it increases from to . Set and . The radial metric is , so its radial null directions are and .
Compactify each static block usingThis conformal compactification puts radial null geodesics at degrees. The exterior is a diamond: its right-hand edges are past and future null infinity, while its left-hand edges are the past and future degenerate horizons. At the left vertex, finite static and give , . This is an end of the infinite spatial throat, not a regular bifurcation surface where the two horizon branches meet. A degenerate Killing horizon has no such bifurcation sphere. The inner block occupies the half-diamond , because there. Its vertical edge is the timelike curvature singularity ; its two diagonal edges are the two horizon branches at . Its outer vertex likewise represents an excluded infinite-throat end.
The static-coordinate compactification identifies the blocks but does not by itself establish the smooth horizon extension. For that, use Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates on the future horizon:Its radial determinant is , so it is nonsingular at . Glue the exterior future edge, with finite, to the inner past edge, with the same finite . The outgoing coordinate similarly gives and extends the other horizon branch. Continue adjoining these regular blocks across every extendible null edge. The construction repeats indefinitely to the future and past, producing the maximal analytic diagram with infinitely many asymptotic exterior regions and inner static regions bounded by timelike singularities. Horizons are null edges, never the excluded throat vertices. Identical edges in different copies must be glued with their time orientations preserved; they are not all the same exterior infinity.
Exterior and inner Penrose building blocks of an extremal charged black hole; the marked edges glue in ingoing coordinates and open circles are excluded throat ends
. Details. The figure shows the two building blocks, rather than compressing the whole infinite extension into a misleading finite diagram. The red edges glue across a future horizon at finite advanced time. Outgoing coordinates extend the next edge to another exterior copy. The thin diagonal lines illustrate the radial light-cone directions.
For spatially conformally flat coordinates, compare the radial and angular parts of with . The angular coefficient requires , and the radial coefficient then gives, in the exterior,Choose the integration constant to make and at infinity. In Cartesian coordinates , , , put . The Extremal Reissner-Nordstrom isotropic coordinates giveThese coordinates have and describe the exterior only. The locus is the limit , not an ordinary point included in this chart. An independent inner chart is obtained with , , giving and ; it must be attached using the regular null coordinates, not by continuing the exterior radial coordinate through a Cartesian origin.
The infinite proper distance is real. Along a constant- exterior radius,It is a property of a static spacelike slice. It does not bound the proper time of a freely falling observer. Indeed, a neutral radial timelike geodesic has conserved energy per unit rest mass and normalization , givingAt the horizon , so the remaining proper time is finite. Moreover,The observer crosses the regular future horizon with finite and finite proper time. This is the Extremal Reissner-Nordstrom causal crossing, which the singular static time coordinate conceals.
There is also a direct causal test for the event horizon. Inside the future horizon, outgoing radial null curves in the ingoing chart satisfy . To reach from below they would requireNear the horizon, . A future timelike or nonradial null curve cannot increase faster than the outgoing radial null curve, since and imply after dropping the nonnegative angular term. Hence a signal that crossed inward cannot return to the original exterior's future null infinity. Curves can encounter other blocks in the maximal analytic extension, but their infinities are not the original observer's infinity. Relative to that asymptotic end, is the boundary of the causal past of future null infinity: it is an event horizon.
Finally, the Reissner-Nordstrom trapped spheres test explains why the proposed observation is unsurprising. Normalize future radial null normals by , , with . The round-sphere null expansions areThere is no region of strictly future-trapped round spheres, while the horizon spheres are marginal with . Absence of those particular trapped surfaces does not imply absence of an event horizon. The geometry has a nonzero horizon area and a genuine timelike singularity at in its extension. The infinite static throat does not remove the black hole: infall crosses its horizon in finite proper time, and no signal returns to the same exterior infinity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 57 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A stationary black hole behaves mechanically like an equilibrium thermodynamic system. Its horizon area A, asymptotic energy E, angular momentum J and electric charge Q are linked by the laws of black-hole mechanics. Let generate its Killing horizon, with the time translation normalized at infinity; its surface gravity is defined by on that horizon. We use and keep G explicit. The horizon electrostatic potential is measured relative to infinity.
The Zeroth law of black-hole mechanics states that kappa is constant on each connected stationary horizon, under the Einstein equations and suitable energy/regularity assumptions. It parallels the zeroth law of thermodynamics, which makes temperature uniform in equilibrium. Kappa need not be constant in a dynamical geometry. For an asymptotically flat static hole, local observers see gravitationally redshifted temperatures; the equilibrium quantity comparable to kappa is the temperature referenced to infinity.
The First law of black-hole mechanics relates nearby stationary solutions:The same leading relation describes a small physical process which perturbs a horizon and subsequently settles to equilibrium, with the appropriate hypotheses on fluxes and final state. The work terms correspond to rotational and electromagnetic work. The structural analogy with the first law of thermodynamics, , identifies area as an entropy-like variable and surface gravity as a temperature-like variable. Classically this fixes their product in the first law, rather than their separate normalizations.
The second law of black-hole mechanics, or black-hole area theorem, states that future event-horizon area does not decrease classically. Its essential geometric ingredient is the Raychaudhuri equation for affinely parametrized null generators. In four dimensions a hypersurface-orthogonal congruence obeysThe null energy condition and Einstein equations make the last term nonpositive. If the expansion became negative, the inequality would focus the generators to a conjugate point in finite affine parameter. Under future completeness and predictability assumptions, that would conflict with their remaining on an achronal event horizon. Thus , and the area element, satisfying , cannot decrease. For a merger the final area is at least the sum of the initial component areas. These assumptions matter: the theorem is a classical statement, not a prohibition of quantum evaporation.
The third law of black-hole mechanics is an unattainability statement: a nonextremal hole cannot be driven to zero surface gravity in a finite physical process satisfying the usual bounded-stress and regularity conditions. This parallels the unattainability form of the Third law of thermodynamics. Extremal stationary solutions exist, so the law concerns how an initially nonextremal hole approaches them. The stronger entropy form of Nernst's theorem does not transfer unchanged: extremal holes can have finite area and entropy, depending on their conserved charges.
Quantum field theory turns the mechanical analogy into a physical thermodynamic identification. Hawking radiation is thermal at infinity to leading semiclassical order, withThese give exactly, so the mechanical first law becomes the thermodynamic first law with Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Scattering through the exterior adds greybody factors to the emitted spectrum but leaves this temperature identification intact. Equilibrium with an external bath and isolated evaporation are different physical states of the field.
During black-hole evaporation, the area can decrease because the semiclassical stress tensor need not satisfy the classical null energy condition. The proposed generalized second law applies instead to , asserting nondecrease of the combined entropy. A Schwarzschild hole illustrates an unusual thermodynamic property: , so its heat capacity is negative. It becomes hotter as it loses energy and is unstable in a simple canonical heat bath, while entropy and energy laws still describe an isolated system. The quantum temperature, area entropy and generalized second law supply the correspondence; the mechanical laws alone do not establish a thermal emission spectrum or a microscopic entropy count.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 57 4 vi Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In natural units, periodic Euclidean time of period beta is the inverse temperature of a thermal quantum state. The horizon regularity calculation therefore gives the Hawking temperatureThis agrees with the radiation calculation based on the near-horizon redshift. Restoring constants with multiplies the expression by . In the neutral case ; the temperature is positive for every nonextremal outer horizon.
The extremal limit is different. At , , so the proper Euclidean radial distance to the horizon diverges logarithmically. This extremal Euclidean throat is an infinite end, with no finite polar origin on which to impose the cone-removal condition. Local smoothness therefore does not select a finite period by the preceding argument. The vanishing surface gravity and the nonextremal limit give , rather than a universally nonzero temperature for all horizon solutions. A geometry with has no black-hole horizon and no Hawking temperature inferred from this horizon argument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 62 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use geometrized units and positive mass . The Schwarzschild metric initially describes an exterior region, not the whole black hole:Here is the areal radius and is Schwarzschild time, normalized at infinity. We must distinguish a removable coordinate singularity from a genuine curvature singularity. The Kretschmann scalar isIt is finite at and diverges at . Thus can be crossed in a better chart, whereas cannot be made a regular point by changing the coordinate chart.
First integrate the Schwarzschild tortoise coordinate:The radial metric becomes . Set ; the Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates giveThe radial block has determinant minus one and smooth coefficients at , so it extends through the future Schwarzschild event horizon. Its ingoing radial null geodesics have constant , while the outgoing radial null geodesics obey . In the future interior both future-directed radial null families decrease ; is therefore an unavoidable future boundary for causal motion there. The outgoing chart similarly gives , extending through the past horizon. A single one of these null charts does not display both horizons or the entire extension.
To regularize both horizons together, introduce Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates in the original exterior:ThenFor the right side defining decreases monotonically from one to minus infinity. In fact its derivative is . Thus it determines a unique smooth wherever , including . At the radial metric coefficient is finite and nonzero, proving actual regularity of both horizons and their intersection, rather than merely relabelling the old coordinate divergence. Allowing all real with produces the simply connected maximal analytic extension, the Kruskal spacetime.
There are four regions of the Kruskal spacetime. The original exterior is ; a second asymptotically flat exterior is . The future black hole has and ; the past white hole has and the same range of areal radius. The horizon branches are and . Their intersection is a regular bifurcation surface, a two-sphere of radius , not the centre of the spacetime. Each point of the radial diagram represents a symmetry two-sphere.
Put and . Radial null geodesics have slopes , and the curvature singularities haveThe upper branch is the future spacelike Schwarzschild singularity; the lower branch is the white hole past singularity. The Killing vector field extends as . It is future directed in the original exterior and past directed in the other exterior for the chosen global time orientation; inside, this stationary vector is spacelike. In the future interior, is a time coordinate decreasing toward the singularity. For example, a radial infaller of unit specific Killing energy obeys and reaches from the horizon in finite proper time . The curvature divergence and this geodesic endpoint show why the extension stops there.
For the global causal picture, compactify the null coordinates using , and let , . The conformal compactification rescales the metric to remove the coordinate factors from the radial metric while preserving its null directions. Since gives on the two singular branches, they become the horizontal lines . The resulting Penrose diagram displays the two exteriors, each with its own past null infinity, future null infinity and spatial infinity, plus the future and past interiors. The singularities are spacelike boundaries; the horizons are interior null surfaces. Future event horizons separate events that can escape to an exterior's future null infinity from events in the black-hole interior.
Kruskal and compactified diagrams of the maximal Schwarzschild extension, showing both exteriors, horizons and spacelike singularities
. Details. The time-symmetric spatial slice has a bridge between the exteriors, but it is not a traversable passage. Future-directed causal curves have nondecreasing and . Moving from the right exterior to the left would require to decrease from positive to negative; the reverse passage would require to decrease. Both are impossible. This proves the non-traversability of the Schwarzschild bridge. The complete eternal vacuum extension has two exteriors, a black hole and a white hole; it has no causal route between its exteriors. A black hole made by stellar collapse is a different global spacetime: its matter-filled past replaces the white hole region, and it normally has only one exterior. The vacuum extension constructed here should not be mistaken for the collapse history of a single star.
With electric charge, spherical electrovacuum instead gives the Reissner-Nordstrom metric, in an electromagnetic normalization absorbing the charge conversion constants:For , there are two simple horizons. Outside the metric is static; between and , and is timelike. Inside , again, so is spacelike and the singularity is timelike. The outer horizon is the event horizon; the inner horizon is a Cauchy horizon. The same logarithmic tortoise-coordinate and exponential-null-coordinate method crosses each simple horizon locally, but one exponential scale does not regularize both simultaneously: their surface gravities have different magnitudes,Continuing the exact metric through successive inner horizons produces repeated blocks with further exteriors, and evolution beyond a Cauchy horizon is not uniquely fixed by data on the original Cauchy hypersurface. The timelike singularity can be avoided by some trajectories in this ideal extension, unlike the unavoidable spacelike singularity of the future Schwarzschild spacetime interior. However, the enormous inner-horizon blueshift makes this exact continuation unstable: perturbations can cause mass inflation. This is an important qualification on the global structure of a charged spherical black hole.
At the two horizons coalesce, and surface gravity is zero. The horizon is a degenerate Killing horizon, the tortoise-coordinate divergence becomes a pole and the ordinary nondegenerate Kruskal spacetime construction must be replaced. The exterior develops an infinitely long spatial throat and the formal Hawking temperature vanishes. For , no real zero of remains: the electrovacuum solution has a naked singularity, not a black hole. Consequently arbitrarily allowing charge changes the causal structure, not just the horizon radius.

