The magnetic vector potential is defined by $\mathbf{B}=\nabla \times \mathbf{A}$. The gauge transformationleaves both $\mathbf{B}$ and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi -{\partial }_t\mathbf{A}$ unchanged. In magnetostatics choose the Coulomb gauge $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0$. Then Ampère's law and the curl-of-curl identity giveThe free-space Green function identity ${\nabla }^2|\mathbf{r}-{\mathbf{r}}^{\prime }{|}^{-1}=-4\pi {\delta }^{(3)}(\mathbf{r}-{\mathbf{r}}^{\prime })$ therefore givesThe boundary condition selects the homogeneous solution; the usual decay condition assumes suitably localized sources. An infinitely long static wire needs a reference for its logarithmically divergent potential, although its magnetic field is finite away from the wire.

For time-dependent sources use the Lorenz gauge, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}+c^{-2}{\partial }_t\varphi =0$, and the outgoing retarded potentialThe scalar potential has the analogous retarded charge-density integral. The two gauges should not be conflated for a general time-dependent source.^[ref]

For the prescribed uncharged wire, $\rho =0$ and $\varphi =0$ is consistent. Translation invariance makes $\mathbf{A}=A_z(r,t)\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ with $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0$, so this particular solution satisfies both gauge conditions. With $s=z^{\prime }-z$,It is zero for $t<r/c$. For $t>r/c$, set $L=\sqrt{c^2{t}^2-r^2}$. The causal interval is $-L<s<L$, giving the switched infinite-wire retarded potentialDifferentiation gives the fields and Poynting vector, for $r>0$, $t>r/c$:Here $\mathbf{B}={\mu }_0\mathbf{H}$ and $B_{\varphi }=-{\partial }_r{A}_z$. All three fields vanish before arrival. For positive $I$, $\mathbf{E}$ opposes the imposed current and the radial energy flow after switching a line current points radially outward: $(-\hat{\mathbf{z}})\times \hat{\mathbf{\varphi }}=\hat{\mathbf{r}}$.

For the graph, let $u=ct/r$. Normalized to $E_{\ast }={\mu }_{0}Ic/(2\pi r)$, $H_{\ast }=I/(2\pi r)$ and $N_{\ast }={\mu }_0{I}^{2}c/(4{\pi }^2{r}^2)$, the curves areAt the wavefront, $|E_z|$ and $H_{\varphi }$ diverge as $(u-1{)}^{-1/2}$ and $N_r$ as $(u-1{)}^{-1}$. This abrupt line-current wavefront singularity reflects the ideal instantaneous turn-on of a line current; a finite rise time smooths the front. At late times,The vector potential grows logarithmically with time in this infinite-wire idealization even as the local magnetic field approaches its static limit. The divergent front should not be interpreted as a finite-energy pulse from a real instantaneous switching experiment.

Polarization under a boost. Lorentz invariance of normalized plane-wave polarization preserves the polarization ellipse's shape, handedness and degree of polarization when its transverse basis is carried to the aberrated ray. The propagation direction changes; equality of a fixed laboratory Cartesian pair of field components is not the appropriate comparison.

Rotate the $yz$ axes so that a general incident vacuum plane wave has unit direction $\hat{\mathbf{n}}=(\cos \vartheta ,\sin \vartheta ,0)$. Choose the transverse basis ${\mathbf{e}}_p=(-\sin \vartheta ,\cos \vartheta ,0)$, ${\mathbf{e}}_s=(0,0,1)$, and arbitrary complex amplitudes $E_p,E_s$. ThenPutting $\beta =v/c$, the given transformation givesThe four-wavevector transforms with Doppler factor $\mathcal{D}=\gamma (1-\beta \cos \vartheta )>0$, givingIn the corresponding basis ${\mathbf{e}}_p^{\prime }=(-\sin {\vartheta }^{\prime },\cos {\vartheta }^{\prime },0)$, ${\mathbf{e}}_s^{\prime }={\mathbf{e}}_s$, the transformed field isBoth components of the Jones vector acquire the same positive real multiplier. Their amplitude ratio and relative wave phase are unchanged, proving preservation of arbitrary linear, circular or elliptical polarization. All Stokes parameters scale by ${\mathcal{D}}^2$, so their normalized values and the degree of polarization are unchanged. An unpolarized light ensemble remains unpolarized under this single-ray boost. A mixture of different ray directions requires separate transformations and is outside this statement.

Reflection from the moving slab. Take the upper interface as $z=0$, the material below it, and the incident ray along $-\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. This fixes the sign left implicit by “along the $z$-axis”; choosing the opposite surface convention changes no result below. Treat $n$ as the real refractive index in the slab's rest frame, with unit relative magnetic permeability. In the laboratory,Transform to the slab rest frame:The incidence is now oblique, in the $xz$ plane, at angle $i$ to the surface normal:The incoming ensemble remains unpolarized light. In this frame the ordinary stationary-interface Fresnel equations give the amplitude coefficients:For generic oblique incidence, $R_s=|r_s{|}^2$ and $R_p=|r_p{|}^2$ differ. Equal incident $s$ and $p$ intensities therefore produce unequal reflected intensities: the reflection is partially polarized. Its degree of linear polarization isThe inverse boost preserves this degree, so the same conclusion holds in the laboratory even though the laboratory incident ray is normal to the surface. The moving material cannot be treated as an isotropic stationary dielectric in that frame.

The reflected rest-frame wavevector is $(\omega /c)(\gamma ,-\gamma \beta ,0,+1)$. Boosting back gives $(\omega /c)(1,0,0,+1)$: the reflected laboratory ray is normal to the surface and has the incident frequency. There is no contradiction with the oblique rest-frame geometry. Translation tangential to a uniform interface does not itself introduce a moving normal mirror.

Complete linear polarization. For Brewster reflection from a tangentially moving dielectric, at Brewster's angle, $r_p=0$ and $\tan i_B=n$. Combining this with the aberration relation givesOnly the $s$ component is reflected. The plane of incidence in the slab frame is $xz$, so the reflected electric field is along $y$, perpendicular to the slab velocity. Boosting this $s$ field back keeps its electric direction along $y$. For example, the reflected rest-frame $s$ field has $B_z^{\prime }=-\beta E_y^{\prime }/c$; hence $E_y=\gamma (E_y^{\prime }+v{B}_z^{\prime })=E_y^{\prime }/\gamma$ and $E_x=E_z=0$.

This exact extinction assumes a transparent nonmagnetic dielectric with $n\ne 1$. At $v=0$ the reflected intensities are equal and the reflected beam is unpolarized. If $n=1$, both reflection coefficients vanish and there is no reflected beam whose polarization can be assigned. With dispersion, evaluate $n$ at the shifted frequency ${\omega }^{\prime }=\gamma \omega$; the Brewster-speed equation is then implicit. absorption generally prevents a real incidence angle from making the complex $r_p$ exactly zero.

antenna quantities. radiation resistance represents emitted power by $P_{\mathrm{rad}}=I_{\mathrm{rms}}^2{R}_{\mathrm{rad}}$ at the feed. It is not Joule heating in the antenna; a separate loss resistance accounts for that. antenna gain is the directional far-field intensity relative to an isotropic radiator supplied with the same input power:It includes radiation efficiency and equals antenna directivity only for a lossless antenna. antenna effective area is defined by the power available to a matched load, $P_{\mathrm{av}}=A_{\mathrm{eff}}{S}_{\mathrm{inc}}$, for incidence from a specified direction and matched polarization. It need not equal a literal geometric collecting area.

Gain–area relation. To derive the antenna gain-effective-area relation, take a passive reciprocal antenna. Its electromagnetic reciprocity makes the receive pattern proportional to the transmit pattern; write $A_{\mathrm{eff}}(\Omega )=KG(\Omega )$. The normalization follows from thermal equilibrium. In the Rayleigh-Jeans law limit, blackbody radiation radiance per unit frequency per unit solid angle is $2k_{B}T/{\lambda }^2$ for two polarizations. A single antenna polarization couples to one half, so the available incident noise power isThe open-circuit Johnson voltage spectrum of the antenna resistance is $4k_{B}T{R}_{\mathrm{rad}}d\nu$. A matched load receives half the open-circuit voltage, giving available power $k_{B}Td\nu$. In a lossless antenna at thermal equilibrium these powers agree; hence $\int A_{\mathrm{eff}}d\Omega ={\lambda }^2$. Since $\int Gd\Omega =4\pi$,The same efficiency factor multiplies receiving area and gain if reciprocal dissipative losses are included consistently. Impedance mismatch or polarization mismatch reduces delivered power further. The factor of two for thermal polarization modes and the factor of four between open-circuit voltage variance and matched-load power are separate effects.

Normalize the radar beam. Interpret the azimuth as signed about the beam centre at $\varphi =0$, so both sides of the narrow lobe are included. Put $u=\theta -\pi /2$. To leading order in the small angular width, $\sin \theta \simeq 1$ and the angular integrals can be extended over the real line:The Gaussian antenna beam solid angle gives the peak on the positive $x$-axis consequently hasHere $N$ is power per solid angle, equal to $r^2{S}_r$ in the far field. The leading neglected solid-angle correction is relative order ${\alpha }^2$.

Return using the supplied electric-dipole response. The electric-dipole radar cross section of a small conducting sphere determines this return. At target range $D$, the incident intensity is $S_t=C/D^2$. Write its root mean square electric field as $E_t$, with $S_t={ϵ}_{0}c{E}_t^2$. The induced electric dipole is $p_{\mathrm{rms}}=4\pi {ϵ}_0{a}^3{E}_t$. A dipole's angular radiation pattern, normalized by $\int {\sin }^2\chi d\Omega =8\pi /3$, gives $d{P}_{\mathrm{sc}}/d\Omega =(3P_{\mathrm{sc}}/8\pi ){\sin }^2\chi$. The backward direction is perpendicular to the induced dipole, so the supplied total dipole power givesThe received intensity is this angular power divided by $D^2$. Using the monostatic radar equation, or directly multiplying by the receive area, givesThe receiver threshold is a voltage across the matched load, so the detectable power is $V_m^2/R$, without another matching factor:This is the electric-dipole result following from the response data provided. It assumes $ka\ll 1$, far-field propagation on each leg, alignment at the beam maximum and no attenuation or additional receiver losses.

Perfect-conductor qualification. perfect-conductor sphere dipole interference arises because the sphere also excludes the oscillating magnetic field. Solving the magnetic boundary problem gives $\mathbf{m}=-2\pi a^3{\mathbf{H}}_t$ in addition to the electric dipole. The magnetic polarizability of a perfectly conducting sphere follows from its induced surface currents.^[ref] In the backward direction the magnetic contribution has half the electric scattering amplitude and the same sign, so the returned intensity is $9/4$ of the electric-only value. Equivalently, the monostatic radar cross section is ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{back}}=9\pi k^4{a}^6$, rather than $4\pi k^4{a}^6$. Including both leading dipoles therefore givesBoth results have been distinguished because the supplied auxiliary data describe only the electric dipole, while the literal perfect-conductor boundary conditions also generate the magnetic one. The backward interference is a leading-order effect, not a higher-order correction in $ka$.^[ref]

Temporal coherence compares the field at different times at one location: a narrow spectrum maintains a predictable phase relation over a longer delay. Spatial coherence compares the field at different locations at the same time: different angular source components illuminate a baseline with different phase differences, which wash out interference when averaged. These are properties of correlations, not claims that all thermal source points have a common phase.

Assume a distant spatially incoherent, quasimonochromatic source, small angles, identical slit transmission, matched polarizations and equal mean intensity at the two slits. For an angular component $\theta$, the relative input phase is $-kd\theta$. Let $\phi$ be the additional observation-plane phase. Incoherent angular components add intensities, givingIts extrema are $2F(0)\pm 2|F(d)|$, henceFor symmetric $I(\theta )$, $F(d)$ is a real cosine transform. Physical visibility is its normalized absolute value; the printed proportionality omits that qualification. A negative signed coherence reverses fringe phase rather than giving negative contrast. This is the small-angle Van Cittert-Zernike theorem. Temporal coherence analogously depends on the Fourier transform of the spectrum.

A Michelson stellar interferometer uses separated collecting mirrors to obtain a large adjustable projected baseline without requiring a monolithic objective of that diameter. Each collector supplies light to a common combiner. Optical path compensation keeps the delay within the temporal coherence range; varying mirror separation samples spatial coherence and resolves stellar angular structure finer than a small collector alone.

Let $g_{\star }(Y)$ be the normalized signed coherence of one star, and take the baseline along the projected binary separation. The equal-brightness binary-star visibility for identical profiles centred at $\pm \beta /2$ giveFor uniform circular discs of angular diameter $\alpha$,For binary separation from visibility-zero spacing, the rapid binary visibility zeros satisfy $Y_j=(j+\frac{1}{2})\lambda /\beta$, so their repeated spacing is $\lambda /\beta$. The slower single-star envelope first vanishes at $Y=1.21967\lambda /\alpha$. The stellar angular diameter from a visibility envelope and the binary separation follow by fitting both scales; multiple baselines distinguish envelope zeros from binary zeros.

Angular width alone does not specify a unique brightness profile. If the intended one-dimensional model is a uniform angular strip of full width $\alpha$, replace the disc factor by $\mathrm{sinc}(\pi \alpha Y/\lambda )$ with $\mathrm{sinc}u=\sin u/u$; its first envelope zero is $\lambda /\alpha$. Limb darkening changes the disc envelope too. Rotating the baseline is necessary to recover an unknown separation direction; a single orientation measures only its projection.

Use metric $\eta =\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$ and common spacetime origins. A four-vector transforms as $A^{\prime }=\Lambda A$ under a Lorentz transformation. A Lorentz invariant is a scalar unchanged by that transformation. Since ${\Lambda }^T\eta \Lambda =\eta$,The wave phase labels the same stage of a physical oscillation at a spacetime event, independently of the observer's coordinates. Equal-phase wavefronts and interference phase differences are physical; fixing a common phase origin makes the continuous phase a Lorentz scalar. For a plane wave,The gradient of a scalar is a covector; raising its index gives the four-wavevector $K^{\mu }=(\omega /c,\mathbf{k})$. Under an $x$ boost,For vacuum light, $k_x=(\omega /c)\cos \theta$, givingA photon has four-momentum $p^{\mu }=\hslash K^{\mu }$, with $K^2=0$. For two photons separated by angle $\alpha$,In the centre-of-momentum frame the least possible pair energy is $2m_e{c}^2$, when both final particles are at rest. Thus the threshold has $(p_1+p_2{)}^2=4m_e^2{c}^2$; above it, excess energy supplies their kinetic energy. ThereforeThe kinematic equality is a limiting threshold; nonzero production phase space requires energies above it. For parallel photons no finite threshold is available, whereas head-on incidence minimizes the required energy:The blackbody-peak photon pair-production estimate, using the frequency-spectrum blackbody peak, $E_1=2.82144k_{B}T=7.29\times 10^{-4}\mathrm{eV}$ at $3\mathrm{K}$, gives $E_{2,\min }\simeq 3.58\times 10^{14}\mathrm{eV}$, or $358\mathrm{TeV}$. If “peak” means the wavelength-spectrum peak, $E_1=4.96511k_{B}T$ instead gives $2.03\times 10^{14}\mathrm{eV}$. The spectral convention changes the prefactor, not the conclusion that photons of order a few $10^{14}\mathrm{eV}$ are needed for this idealized peak-photon threshold.