Albert Fert by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Albert Fert coauthored the discovery of giant magnetoresistance in alternating iron and chromium layers. In the 1988 measurements, a magnetic field of 2 tesla nearly halved the electrical resistivity of one thin-chromium sample at 4.2 kelvin. Spin-dependent electron transmission through the chromium layers explained why changing the magnetic arrangement changed the electrical resistance so strongly. The experiment made nanoscale layer structure and electron spin directly relevant to an easily measured electrical signal.[ref]
Mário Norberto Baibich by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental condensed matter physicist who coauthored measurements of giant magnetoresistance in alternating iron and chromium layers. Applying a magnetic field substantially reduced the electrical resistance, attributed to spin-dependent electron transmission between the magnetic layers. The experiment connected a nanoscale multilayer structure to a large, electrically measurable magnetic response.[ref]
Serge Haroche by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Serge Haroche developed experiments that probe photons stored in a cavity without immediately absorbing them. Passing chemical atoms interact with the cavity field and carry information about its photon number to an external detector.
Repeated nondestructive probes can progressively narrow the possible photon number, allowing the evolution of a measurement result to be followed. The approach separates the system carrying the stored energy from the successive particles carrying information about it, enabling experimental studies of quantum measurement and the quantum-to-classical transition.[ref]
Michel Brune by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental physicist who coauthored measurements of a field stored in a cavity using successive atomic probes. Correlations between repeated readings demonstrated reduced uncertainty in photon number, testing the repeatability aspect of quantum measurement without destroying the field at each observation.[ref]
Jean-Michel Raimond by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental physicist whose collaborative cavity experiments explored quantum measurement. In a 2007 study, repeated nondestructive probes progressively determined an initially uncertain photon number, making the gradual emergence of a definite measurement result experimentally accessible.[ref]
Sébastien Gleyzes by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental physicist who coauthored a quantum nondemolition measurement of cavity photon number. Atomic probes crossed the cavity one at a time; field-induced changes in their internal evolution revealed the stored field while preserving it for further probing.[ref]
Christine Guerlin by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental physicist who coauthored a 2007 demonstration of progressive quantum measurement of cavity photon number. Successive chemical atoms acquired information from the stored field without absorbing its photons, allowing repeated measurements to narrow the possible photon number.[ref]
Christopher Monroe by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental atomic physicist who coauthored resolved sideband cooling of a trapped ion close to its three-dimensional motional ground state. Raman transitions remove vibrational excitation in controlled steps, making the ion's quantized motion accessible for subsequent operations. Cooling the motion is crucial when it participates in coherent manipulation of trapped-ion qubits.[ref]
Wayne M. Itano by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An atomic physicist who coauthored resolved sideband cooling of a trapped ion to near the motional ground state. The experiment resolves transitions that change vibrational excitation and uses Raman cooling to reduce that excitation in three dimensions. It links precision spectroscopy of a single trapped particle to control of its motion.[ref]
Peter Higgs by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Peter Higgs explained how coupling a broken-symmetry scalar theory to gauge fields changes the physical particle spectrum. In his 1964 model, a massless scalar degree of freedom supplies the longitudinal mode of a massive gauge boson; another scalar excitation remains. Thus the massless-particle conclusion of the Goldstone theorem does not apply unchanged to the gauged system. This Higgs mechanism connects the vacuum's field configuration with measurable particle masses and an additional scalar particle.[ref]
A physicist who investigated the Higgs mechanism.[ref]
Figure 1.
Portrait of Peter Higgs
. Bengt Nyman, photograph; JB Hoang Tam, existing portrait crop. CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.
François Englert by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
François Englert co-developed a mechanism for generating gauge boson masses with Robert Brout. The starting theory retains its local gauge structure, while the physical vacuum gives a different excitation spectrum. Their 1964 paper explains how this avoids carrying the massless-mode conclusion of a global broken symmetry unchanged into a gauge theory. The connection between spontaneous symmetry breaking and massive vector particles became central to the Higgs mechanism.[ref]
A physicist who co-directed the theoretical physics unit at Université libre de Bruxelles.[ref]
Figure 1.
Portrait of François Englert
. Bengt Nyman, photograph; Wabbuh, existing portrait crop. CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.
Robert Brout by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Robert Brout and François Englert showed how gauge bosons can acquire mass in a theory with spontaneous symmetry breaking. Their 1964 analysis couples a degenerate-vacuum matter system to a gauge field. The resulting excitation spectrum can contain massive vector particles rather than the massless scalar modes expected for an ungauged broken symmetry. This supplied a mechanism for relating interaction symmetry to particle mass, an essential ingredient of the later electroweak theory.[ref]
A physicist who developed theoretical physics research at Université libre de Bruxelles.[ref]
Figure 1.
Portrait of Robert Brout
. Pnicolet at the English Wikipedia; image provided by Robert Brout on 20 August 2007. CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.
Takaaki Kajita by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Takaaki Kajita contributed to the Super-Kamiokande observation of atmospheric neutrino oscillations. Muon neutrinos arriving from below had crossed a much longer path through the Earth than those produced overhead. The direction-dependent deficit therefore tested propagation, while comparisons with electron-like events helped constrain possible production or detector explanations. The 1998 report found the pattern consistent with conversion between muon neutrinos and tau neutrinos.[ref]
A physicist researching atmospheric neutrinos and neutrino oscillations.[ref]
Arthur B. McDonald by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Arthur B. McDonald led work at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, which distinguished a change of neutrino flavor from a low total solar neutrino flux. Reactions on deuterium provided different flavor sensitivities: the charged-current channel selected electron neutrinos, while the neutral-current channel measured all active neutrino flavors. Their comparison revealed a non-electron component while the total flux agreed with solar expectations. The detector thereby tested the solar neutrino problem without requiring all missing electron-flavor events to mean missing solar production.[ref]
A physicist working in experimental particle astrophysics.[ref]
Figure 1.
Portrait of Arthur B. McDonald
. Holger Motzkau, 2015, Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons; photograph at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences press conference, 7 December 2015. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported., via Wikimedia Commons. Source.
Yoichiro Suzuki by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Yoichiro Suzuki worked on water-based Cherenkov radiation detection of neutrinos, including solar and atmospheric measurements. The Super-Kamiokande method classifies the visible rings made by secondary electrons and muons and compares their rates with the direction through the Earth. A directional deficit carries information about propagation distance as well as production. This makes the apparatus a test of neutrino oscillations, rather than simply a counter of weakly interacting particles.[ref]
A physicist researching solar neutrinos and neutrino detection.[ref]
George Ewan by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
George Ewan helped introduce germanium detectors into experimental nuclear physics, improving the energy resolution of gamma ray measurements. His university credits him with the first nuclear experiment using such a detector. He also became the original Canadian spokesperson of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory collaboration in 1984 and helped develop the project through its funding stage. These contributions connect instrument development with the organization of a large experiment capable of testing solar neutrino physics.[ref]
Andre Geim by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Andre Geim coauthored measurements showing that electric charge carriers in graphene can behave as effectively massless quasiparticles described by the Dirac equation. The 2005 experiments found an unusual sequence of quantum Hall effect plateaus and an oscillation phase associated with Berry phase. Here the Dirac description concerns low-energy quasiparticles in a carbon lattice, rather than free electrons acquiring zero rest mass. The results connect a readily contacted material with concepts usually introduced in relativistic quantum mechanics.[ref]
Konstantin Novoselov by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Konstantin Novoselov coauthored experiments showing that atomically thin graphene can operate as an electrically controlled conducting sheet. A gate changes its carrier population, making a single carbon layer an accessible two-dimensional electron gas. The 2004 work demonstrated a field effect and ballistic transport over submicrometre distances even at room temperature. It turned an isolated atomic layer into a device for testing transport in two dimensions.[ref]
A physicist researching experimental condensed matter physics.[ref]
Figure 1. . Zp2010; 30 August 2013. CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.
Philip Russell Wallace by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
A theoretical condensed matter physicist who calculated the energy bands of graphite using the tight-binding approximation. His 1947 analysis connected the layered structure to strongly direction-dependent transport and magnetic response. Modeling how electronic states spread between neighboring atoms made the bulk behavior accessible from a relatively simple lattice description.[ref]
David J. Wineland by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
David J. Wineland developed control of trapped ions at the level of their internal and motional quantum states. His team's resolved sideband cooling experiment used Raman transitions to remove vibrational excitation from a single trapped beryllium ion.
Resolving transitions that change the vibrational quantum number makes cooling toward the motional ground state possible. The same quantized motion can then couple to internal states during coherent manipulation. Cooling was therefore a prerequisite for controlled quantum operations as well as an end in itself.[ref]
Figure 1.
Portrait of David J. Wineland
. NIST; existing portrait crop uploaded by Materialscientist. Public domain in the United States: U.S. federal Department of Commerce official-duty work (PD-USGov-DOC / PD US Government). Source usage terms, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact