Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Antony Hewish designed a radio survey instrument to identify compact sources through interplanetary scintillation: rapid intensity changes caused by propagation through the solar wind. While operating and inspecting its records, his research student Jocelyn Bell Burnell identified the unusual signal that became the first known pulsar.
The team checked the repeated pulses against instrumental and terrestrial explanations. Their recurrence at a fixed celestial direction helped establish an astronomical origin. The discovery illustrates how an instrument designed for one variability process can uncover another when its unexpected signals are investigated.[ref]
Observation of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source by Antony Hewish and others. 1968 discovery report
[ref]Little Green Men, White Dwarfs or Pulsars? by Jocelyn Bell Burnell. Telescope design, record inspection, fast recordings and sidereal-time checks
Portrait of Antony Hewish
. Woodruff T. Sullivan III; NRAO/AUI Archives, Sullivan Collection; rights NRAO/AUI/NSF. CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Robert Woodrow Wilson and Arno Allan Penzias measured an unexplained microwave signal using a horn-reflector antenna and a receiver compared with a cooled reference. Their 1965 paper reported excess antenna noise that was approximately isotropic, unpolarized and seasonally stable.
They tested contributions from the atmosphere, instrumental losses and ground pickup before identifying the residual. Its interpretation as cosmic microwave background connected a carefully calibrated radio measurement to the thermal history of the Universe. The initial excess antenna temperature was not itself a full measurement of the background's blackbody spectrum.[ref]
A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc per Second by Arno Allan Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson. pp. 419–421: reference switching, atmospheric and instrumental corrections, and residual characteristics
Portrait of Robert Woodrow Wilson
. Victor R. Ruiz; portrait crop by Auguel. CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar investigated stellar structure and stability by connecting microscopic physics to the equilibrium of entire stars. His analysis of white dwarfs included the effect of special relativity on the electron degeneracy pressure supporting them against gravity.
At sufficiently high mass density, increasing density does not make that support grow rapidly enough to balance arbitrarily large stellar mass. The resulting Chandrasekhar limit is about 1.4 solar masses for the usual composition assumption. It is a limit for this form of stellar support, with major consequences for the possible endpoints of stellar evolution.[ref]
On Stars, Their Evolution and Their Stability by Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. White-dwarf equilibrium, relativistic degeneracy and limiting-mass discussion
Portrait of Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
. AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives, Gift of Kameshwar Wali; individual photographer not specified. AIP attribution-only permission for any purpose, including redistribution, derivatives and commercial use, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Fred Hoyle helped explain the origin of chemical Elements through stellar nucleosynthesis. The 1957 synthesis paper he coauthored connected stellar conditions, nuclear reactions and the observed pattern of elemental abundances.
Different processes operate under different physical conditions. Charged-particle reactions can build progressively heavier nuclei, while neutron capture supplies routes to many nuclei beyond the iron group. Comparing reaction timescales with stellar conditions connects laboratory nuclear physics to the composition of stars and later generations of matter. The account is a synthesis of several production mechanisms, rather than a claim that one stellar reaction makes every chemical element.[ref]
Synthesis of the Elements in Stars by E. Margaret Burbidge and others. Sections I–II: abundances, physical processes, sites and timescales of stellar synthesis
Portrait of Fred Hoyle
. Woodruff T. Sullivan III; NRAO/AUI Archives, Sullivan Collection; rights NRAO/AUI/NSF. CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Joseph Hooton Taylor Jr. and Russell Alan Hulse discovered a pulsar in a binary star system. Changes in the timing of the pulses revealed the pulsar's orbital motion, making an otherwise unseen compact companion measurable.[ref]
Discovery of a Pulsar in a Binary System by Russell Alan Hulse and Joseph Hooton Taylor Jr.. p. L51, binary interpretation from pulse-period variations
Long-term pulse timing then tested general relativity. After accounting for other timing effects, the decreasing orbital period agreed with the loss of orbital energy predicted from gravitational radiation. The system supplied an indirect test of gravitational waves through their effect on an orbiting source.[ref]
Binary Pulsars and Relativistic Gravity by Joseph Hooton Taylor Jr.. Timing-model discussion and orbital-decay comparison with general relativity
Portrait of Joseph Hooton Taylor Jr.
. Betsy Devine (Betsythedevine), original photograph; Materialscientist, derivative crop. CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Riccardo Giacconi pioneered X-ray astronomy using instruments carried above Earth's absorbing atmosphere. His team's 1962 rocket flight found a strong source outside the Solar system, later known as Scorpius X-1, together with a diffuse X-ray background.[ref]
Evidence for x Rays From Sources Outside the Solar System by Riccardo Giacconi and others. pp. 439–443: rocket-counter observations and directional excess
His Nobel lecture traces the subsequent transition from brief rocket measurements to more sensitive surveys and imaging instruments. Increasing collecting area, observing duration and angular resolving power changed the questions that could be asked: sources could be located, separated and studied as physical systems.[ref]
The Dawn of X-Ray Astronomy by Riccardo Giacconi. Historical account of the first extrasolar X-ray source and development of X-ray observatories
Portrait of Riccardo Giacconi
. ESO; distributed through the International Astronomical Union, image ann18062a. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, as stated for this IAU-distributed image., via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Herbert Gursky coauthored the 1962 rocket experiment that detected X-rays from beyond the Solar system. Large-area counters carried above the absorbing atmosphere recorded a strong celestial source as well as a more diffuse background.
The payload's changing direction allowed count rate to be compared with sky direction, separating a localized source from broadly distributed counts. The experiment opened X-ray astronomy to objects whose energetic emission could not be measured by ordinary ground-based optical observations.[ref]
Evidence for x Rays From Sources Outside the Solar System by Riccardo Giacconi and others. Author list and pp. 439–443: rocket counters, directional count rates and extrasolar radiation
Robert Hanbury Brown and Richard Quentin Twiss developed intensity interferometry, using correlated fluctuations in detected light rather than direct combination of optical field amplitudes. Their experiments established how the correlation changes with the separation between detectors.
Applied to stars, the method connects spatial coherence to apparent angular size. It measures a statistical property of the arriving photons, allowing stellar diameters to be inferred even when atmospheric fluctuations make direct optical phase measurements difficult.[ref]
Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light by Robert Hanbury Brown and Richard Quentin Twiss. 1956 experiment: spatial intensity correlations
[ref]Portrait of Robert Hanbury Brown
. Via Wikimedia Commons; credits and usage information are on the linked source file page. Source.John C. Mather developed and led the scientific use of the COBE FIRAS instrument to test the radiation spectrum of the cosmic microwave background. Comparing the sky signal against a controlled reference blackbody made the measurement a stringent test of spectral shape.
The measured spectrum closely followed Planck's law at a temperature near 2.7 kelvin, strongly supporting a thermal origin in the early Universe. This result addresses a different observable from angular anisotropy: a nearly perfect blackbody spectrum concerns the distribution over frequency, while a sky map concerns changes with direction.[ref]
Nobel Lecture: From the Big Bang to the Nobel Prize and beyond by John C. Mather. Discussion of FIRAS calibration, blackbody spectrum and cosmological interpretation
Portrait of John C. Mather
. Source. Charles L. Bennett led the final nine-year WMAP analysis of cosmic microwave background maps. The work combined sky temperature and polarization measurements while modeling Galactic foreground emission and the response of the observing beams.
The angular patterns constrain cosmological parameters through a physical model of the early Universe. The paper compared the resulting Lambda-CDM model with independent observations, including baryon acoustic oscillations. Its quoted cosmic age and expansion rate are fitted consequences of those combined data and assumptions, rather than direct readings from a single sky image.[ref]
Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results by C. L. Bennett and others. Abstract: beam treatment, foreground separation, nine-year maps and combined cosmological constraints
Portrait of Charles L. Bennett
. Johns Hopkins University (JHU); individual photographer not separately named in the File. File dated 2015. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International., via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Saul Perlmutter led the Supernova Cosmology Project's measurement of cosmic expansion using 42 distant Type Ia supernovae. Their peak brightnesses were standardized through a relation between light curve width and luminosity, then compared with a nearby sample.
Fitting the magnitude–cosmological redshift relation constrained the matter and cosmological constant contributions together. The paper reported a joint parameter distribution and distinguished statistical errors from identified systematic effects. Its result favored a substantial cosmological constant contribution within the tested models, independently supporting the accelerating-expansion picture.[ref]
Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae by Saul Perlmutter and others. Abstract: sample, width–luminosity standardization, joint density constraints and uncertainty treatment
Portrait of Saul Perlmutter
. The White House, 2021 PCAST member portrait; existing Commons cropped version. Public domain in the United States: official-duty work by an employee of the Executive Office of the President. Source usage terms, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Brian Schmidt coauthored the High-Z Supernova Search Team's 1998 evidence for accelerating cosmic expansion. The analysis joined nearby Type Ia supernovae to a more distant sample to test the relation between luminosity distance and cosmological redshift.
Comparing multiple light curve fitting procedures helped test whether the inferred faintness depended on one calibration method. The combined observations favored an accelerating cosmological model with a positive cosmological constant.[ref]
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant by Adam Riess and others. Author list and abstract: combined samples, alternative light-curve fits and cosmological constraints
Portrait of Brian Schmidt
. Tim Wetherell. CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Adam Riess led the 1998 analysis of Type Ia supernovae that provided evidence for accelerating cosmic expansion. His team compared distant and nearby supernovae, using their light curves to estimate distances and their cosmological redshifts to test the expansion history.
The distant events were farther away than expected in the cited low-mass density model without a cosmological constant. Different fitting methods and sample selections favored a positive cosmological constant and present acceleration. The evidence came from a distance–redshift relation interpreted within cosmological models.[ref]
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant by Adam Riess and others. Abstract: nearby and high-redshift samples, distance excess and agreement of independent fits
Portrait of Adam Riess
. Original photographer not named; Commons crop/rights release credited to Falcorian (assumed by File metadata). Public-domain dedication by copyright holder (PD-self), with fallback unrestricted permission where dedication is not legally possible, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Michel Mayor develops precise stellar radial velocity measurements and their use in searches for unseen companions. With Didier Queloz, he reported a planetary companion to 51 Pegasi in 1995.
The host star's regularly changing Doppler shift revealed its reflex motion around a shared center of mass. The approximately four-day orbital period showed that a giant planet could exist much closer to its host star than the giant planets of the Solar system. The discovery made this previously unexpected orbital arrangement an observational constraint on planet formation.[ref]
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz. pp. 355–359: ELODIE measurements and short-period planetary companion
Portrait of Michel Mayor
. Thor Nielsen / NTNU; source distributed by ESA. CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Didier Queloz and Michel Mayor detected a planetary companion to the solar-type star 51 Pegasi through periodic changes in its radial velocity. Their 1995 observations used the ELODIE spectrograph to measure the stellar Doppler shift.
The signal repeated in about four days, implying a close companion rather than a distant analogue of Jupiter. The inferred minimum companion mass was planetary. Because radial velocity measures only the line-of-sight component of the reflex motion, the orbital inclination remains part of the mass inference.[ref]
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz. pp. 355–359: periodic radial velocities, short-period solution and companion interpretation
Portrait of Didier Queloz
. Astrofisch66 (own work). CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Reinhard Genzel investigates the central mass of the Milky Way using the motion of nearby stars. He coauthored the 2002 report led by Rainer Schödel that followed a close stellar orbit around Sagittarius A*.
An orbital path tests more than a high stellar speed: its curvature, timing and closest approach constrain how tightly the attracting mass is concentrated. The measured short-period orbit required several million solar masses in a compact central region, providing strong dynamical evidence for a supermassive black hole.[ref]
Closest Star Seen Orbiting the Supermassive Black Hole at the Centre of the Milky Way by Rainer Schödel and others. Author list and abstract: ten-year astrometry, Keplerian orbit and compact enclosed mass
Portrait of Reinhard Genzel
. MPE (Commons uploader HHgarching). CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Andrea M. Ghez measures stellar orbits around the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. Her team's Keck observations combined astrometry with radial velocities for the short-period star S0-2.
An angular orbit alone leaves a mass-distance degeneracy of an angular stellar orbit. Adding Doppler spectroscopy supplies a physical velocity scale, allowing central mass and Euclidean distance to be fitted together. Their 2008 analysis inferred roughly four million solar masses at a Euclidean distance of eight kiloparsecs, and examined how source confusion and assumptions about central motion affected the result.[ref]
Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way's Central Supermassive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits by Andrea M. Ghez and others. Abstract: Keck astrometry and radial velocities, unconstrained orbit and identified systematic limitations
Portrait of Andrea M. Ghez
. International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA; still from Feeling gravity’s pull, a video by Julie Winokur. CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Rainer Schödel led a study that traced a short-period star around Sagittarius A* at the center of the Milky Way. Ten years of high-resolution astrometry captured both the nearest and farthest parts of the star's highly eccentric orbit.
The 2002 analysis found an orbital period of about 15 years and a close approach of only about 17 light-hours. Concentrating several million solar masses inside that small region excluded plausible extended clusters as the source of the central gravitational field, strengthening the supermassive black hole interpretation.[ref]
Closest Star Seen Orbiting the Supermassive Black Hole at the Centre of the Milky Way by Rainer Schödel and others. Abstract: observed orbital coverage, period, pericentre and excluded extended-mass alternatives
Aleksander Wolszczan and Dale Frail discovered a planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257+12 through precise radio timing. The regular pulses supplied a clock whose observed arrivals varied periodically.
Those variations trace the changing light-travel time as the pulsar moves in response to its companions. Fitting the timing signal constrains the companions' orbital periods and minimum masses. The discovery established that the search for exoplanets could extend beyond ordinary main-sequence host stars.[ref]
A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12 by Aleksander Wolszczan and Dale Frail. pp. 145–147: millisecond-pulsar timing and planetary companions
Portrait of Aleksander Wolszczan
. Ludek. CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Dale Frail and Aleksander Wolszczan reported planetary companions to a millisecond pulsar in 1992. Their evidence came from small periodic variations in the arrival times of its radio pulses.
An orbiting pulsar changes its Euclidean distance from the observer, changing the travel time of its radio waves. Timing residuals can therefore reveal a reflex orbit and constrain unseen companion masses. This method found a planetary system around a neutron star, a very different environment from the Solar system.[ref]
A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12 by Aleksander Wolszczan and Dale Frail. pp. 145–147: timing variations and planetary interpretation
Portrait of Dale Frail
. Dale Frail. CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source. Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact






















