For mutually coherent monochromatic waves with the same polarization of waves in the scalar convention of wave interference, constructive interference reaches its maximum at phase difference $\delta =2\pi m$, with integer $m$. The wave amplitudes add, giving $I_{\max }=I_1+I_2+2\sqrt{I_1{I}_2}$. Equal individual wave intensities $I_0$ give $4I_0$; individual wave intensities $1$ and $0.25$ give $2.25$ in their common unit. This maximum assumes the optical coherence and detection conditions stated in wave interference.

An isolating integral is a regular single-valued integral of motion whose fixed value restricts accessible phase space to a lower-dimensional level set. Functional independence of several such integrals means their differentials are linearly independent on the region considered. A central potential has specific orbital energy and the three components of specific angular momentum as four generically independent integrals. A Kepler orbit has a fifth independent integral supplied by its fixed apsidal direction, encoded by the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector; its vector components obey two constraints with energy and angular momentum. Circular and radial orbits are degenerate cases of this count.

For $\Phi (R,\varphi -\Omega t,z)$ with constant pattern angular velocity $\Omega$, ordinary specific energy satisfies $\dot{E}={\partial }_t\Phi =-\Omega {\partial }_{\varphi }\Phi$ and specific axial angular momentum satisfies ${\dot{L}}_z=-{\partial }_{\varphi }\Phi$. Their combination $E_J$ is conserved. This is the rotating-frame integral of motion; in the circular restricted three-body problem, the usual Jacobi constant is an affine rescaling of it. Thus time dependence in an inertial frame does not alone imply the absence of all integrals.

For steady ideal flow through a horizontal contracting nozzle, Bernoulli equation gives inlet gauge pressure $p_0=\rho Q^2(A_1^{-2}-A_0^{-2})/2$. The integral momentum equation gives the fluid's force on the nozzle as $p_0{A}_0-\rho Q^2(A_1^{-1}-A_0^{-1})$ in the outlet direction. Simplification yields the displayed nonnegative magnitude. The external holding force has equal magnitude and the opposite direction.

The fraction field of an integral domain $R$ consists of fractions $a/b$ with $a,b\in R$ and $b\ne 0$, modulo the usual equivalence relation.

In an integral domain, $ab=ac$ with $a\ne 0$ gives $a(b-c)=0$ by the distributive property. Since there are no zero divisors, $b-c=0$. Conversely, in a nonzero commutative ring, this cancellation property rules out zero divisors by comparing $ab=0$ with $a0=0$.

Write $\alpha =\sqrt[4]{2}$ and an algebraic integer as $a+b\alpha +c{\alpha }^2+d{\alpha }^3$ with rational coefficients. Traces to $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ show $2a,2b,2c,4d$ are integers. The norm has coefficients $a^2+2c^2-4bd$ and $2ac-b^2-2d^2$ in the integral basis $1,\sqrt{2}$. Set $A=2a$, $B=2b$, $C=2c$, $D=4d$. Integrality gives $A^2+2C^2-2BD\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}4)$ and $4AC-2B^2-D^2\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}8)$. The second forces $D$ even and then $B$ even; the first forces $A,C$ even; returning to the second forces $D$ divisible by four. Thus all original coefficients are integers, proving the integral basis $1,\alpha ,{\alpha }^2,{\alpha }^3$.

For an odd prime $p\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}4)$, traces to the three quadratic subfields show that an integer has coefficients $(a+b\sqrt{p}+c\sqrt{2}+d\sqrt{2p})/2$ with rational integers $a,b,c,d$. Its norm to $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p})$ forces $a,b$ even and $c\equiv d(\mathrm{mod}2)$. Hence an integral basis is $1,\sqrt{2},\sqrt{p},(1+\sqrt{p})\sqrt{2}/2$. The last generator satisfies the monic polynomial $X^4-(p+1)X^2+(p-1{)}^2/4$, proving integrality as well as spanning. The subfield used for the norm matters: the norm to $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ has different coefficients.

Let $m_1,m_2$ be coprime positive square-free integers, with $m_1\not\equiv \pm m_2(\mathrm{mod}9)$. The displayed integral basis has discriminant $-27m_1^2{m}_2^2$. Both nonconstant generators are integral, and their products are integral linear combinations of the three basis elements. At a prime dividing $m_1$, the cubic for $\alpha$ is Eisenstein; at a prime dividing $m_2$, the cubic for ${\alpha }^2/m_2$ is Eisenstein. If $3\nmid m_1{m}_2$, then $m_1{m}_2^2\not\equiv \pm 1(\mathrm{mod}9)$, and a shift by $1$ or $-1$ gives an Eisenstein polynomial at three. These local uniformizer generators show that the order is maximal at all primes dividing its discriminant; elsewhere the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice already gives maximality.

Proportional-integral control is the proportional and integral part of a PID controller, with the derivative term omitted. Proportional-integral control combines proportional control with integral action. For the ideal controlled plant, a constant reference signal, exact measurement and a constant control disturbance, the ordinary differential equations giveThe characteristic polynomial is ${\lambda }^2+k_p\lambda +k_i$. Positive $k_p$ and $k_i$ imply asymptotic stability of the equilibrium point: real roots of a polynomial have negative sum and positive product, hence are both negative; a nonreal complex conjugate pair has real part $-k_p/2<0$. This is a short stability check for this ideal controlled plant, rather than a rule for every dynamical system.

At the equilibrium point, $e_{\ast }=0$, $x_{\ast }=r$, and $z_{\ast }=-w/k_i$. For $w=0.2$ and $k_i=1$, the stored value $z_{\ast }=-0.2$ supplies $u_{\ast }=-0.2$ even though the tracking error is zero. This separates the eventual accuracy from the transient response: integral action cancels the lasting offset but can make the plant output pass beyond the goal. The authors discuss practical limits on integral action in Åström and Murray, Feedback Systems, Chapter 11.

For $k_p=2$, $k_i=1$, $x(0)=z(0)=0$ and $w=0$, the characteristic polynomial is $(\lambda +1{)}^2$. The initial conditions are $e(0)=1$ and $\dot{e}(0)=-2$, givingThe tracking error changes sign at $t=1$. Since $\dot{x}=(2-t)e^{-t}$, the largest plant output occurs at $t=2$ and is $1+e^{-2}\simeq 1.135335$, about $13.53\%$ above the reference signal.

For a separate comparison, start the control disturbance $w=0.2$ at $t=4$. For $t\ge 4$, write $s=t-4$. The exact responses areThe proportional control response tends to $1.1$, while the proportional-integral control response returns to $1$. At $t=8$, the values are approximately $1.099966$ and $1.017001$. The added term in the proportional-integral control response eventually vanishes, exposing how memory removes a constant control disturbance's lasting effect.

A compact connected regular common level of $n$ commuting integrals is an $n$-torus with local action-angle coordinates.

A superintegrable Hamiltonian system with $n$ degrees of freedom has more than $n$ functionally independent integrals of motion, including an integrable set of $n$ in involution. At a regular nonzero Hamiltonian vector field, at most $2n-1$ independent integral differentials can annihilate the flow. A maximally superintegrable system attains that bound. The three-dimensional Kepler orbit has five independent integrals through energy, angular momentum and the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector. A closed orbit on one isolated resonance is weaker than maximal superintegrability on an open phase-space region.

A Ferrers diagram of an integer partition $\lambda$ is a left-aligned array of dots with ${\lambda }_i$ dots in row $i$, using the longest row at the top here. Replacing each dot by a square cell gives a Young diagram. Reading the column lengths gives the conjugate partition.^[ref]

An integer partition whose Young diagram has at most $h$ rows and at most $w$ cells per row. Zeros may pad the list of row lengths. The partition interpretation of Gaussian binomial coefficients counts these diagrams by their number of cells.

Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. by R. A. DeFronzo and others separates two questions. In a hyperglycemic clamp, variable glucose infusion holds blood glucose above baseline while sampled insulin reports the response. The 1979 article's abstract reports an early release burst followed by a slower rise. In a euglycemic insulin clamp, infused insulin is held elevated and variable glucose infusion holds blood glucose at baseline. Frequent blood sampling, a glucose analyzer, and controlled infusion apparatus make the imposed concentration a maintained condition rather than an uncontrolled consequence. ^[ref][ref]

The maintained glucose level controls an important confounder: a change in blood glucose would itself change uptake and hormone release. At a steady state, conservation of mass gives uptake equal to infused supply plus endogenous production, after accounting for losses. Consequently, infusion alone estimates uptake only if endogenous production is negligible and the other balance assumptions hold. Labelled glucose measurements can estimate residual endogenous production; matching infused insulin across comparisons matters. Whole-body uptake cannot by itself identify the responding tissue, and plasma insulin reflects both release and removal. This interpretation uses the accessible 1979 abstract and the later authored methods chapter; the original article's full methods were not available for inspection.^[ref]

A single polypeptide precursor whose processing yields mature insulin and C-peptide; it is not the two-chain mature hormone. The biosynthetic distinction is described under insulin.

Drosophila pseudoobscura is the species of insect used in the dietary divergence and mating isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura experiment. The independently maintained experimental biological populations were not already different species.

For $X_t=W_t+\alpha t$ with an independent equiprobable drift $\alpha \in \{-a,a\}$, the likelihood ratio between the two drifts is $e^{2a{X}_t}$. Multiplying the normal distribution densities of successive increments proves this ratio for every observation partition; continuity then gives the full observed-path posterior. The Bayes' theorem gives $q_t=\mathbb{P}(\alpha =a\mid {\mathcal{F}}_t^X)=(1+e^{-2a{X}_t}{)}^{-1}$. Thus the observed drift is $a(2q_t-1)=a\tanh (a{X}_t)$. The process ${\hat{W}}_t=X_t-{\int }_0^{t}a\tanh (a{X}_s)ds$ is an observed-filtration martingale with quadratic variation $t$, so the Lévy characterization of Brownian motion makes it a Brownian motion. The observed state is a scaled diffusion with hyperbolic tangent drift.

Observe $Y_t=\lambda t+W_t$, with an independent Gaussian random vector $\lambda$ of mean $m_0$ and covariance matrix $V_0$. Its posterior is Gaussian with mean $m_t=(I+t{V}_0{)}^{-1}(m_0+V_0{Y}_t)$ and covariance matrix $V_t=V_0(I+t{V}_0{)}^{-1}$. These formulas also hold for a singular positive semidefinite matrix $V_0$. When $V_0$ is invertible, completing the square in the Bayes' theorem gives $V_t^{-1}=V_0^{-1}+tI$ and $m_t=V_t(V_0^{-1}{m}_0+Y_t)$. The observed innovation process ${\hat{W}}_t=Y_t-{\int }_0^t{m}_{s}ds$ is a Brownian motion in the observation filtration, and $d{m}_t=V_{t}d{\hat{W}}_t$.

Every inner model $N$ of ZF contains the ambient constructible universe $L$. By induction, $L_{\alpha }^N=L_{\alpha }$: at successor stages, satisfaction in the same set structure and definability with parameters are absolute; at limits both constructions take the same union. Thus, if the ambient universe satisfies $V=L$, its only inner model of ZF is itself, and it satisfies the axiom of choice. A procedure that must produce a choice-failing inner model from every model of ZF is therefore impossible. This does not assert that arbitrary inner models of arbitrary choice universes satisfy choice; the obstruction concerns a uniform construction.