Equivalent chemical bonds in an intact molecule need not have equal successive bond-dissociation enthalpies. Once one chemical bond is removed, the next reactant has a different electronic quantum state and may relax to a different molecular geometry. The successive steps compare different species. This distinction also explains why a tabulated average chemical bond strength is not necessarily the cost of the first cleavage.^[ref]

For an invented species $A{B}_2$, stipulate the following gas-phase steps, with all enthalpies at the same temperature and the same standard states:The symbols stand for hypothetical species with consistently chosen electronic states. They are not values for water or another measured molecule. By Hess's law, the total enthalpy of atomization for $A{B}_2(g)\to A(g)+2B(g)$ is $700\mathrm{kJ}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$; the arithmetic mean per broken chemical bond is $350\mathrm{kJ}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$. Neither individual step equals that mean. Nor must the second step be cheaper: here it is deliberately more expensive. An exact sequence sums exactly; substituting averages taken from other molecules generally gives only an estimate.

Take an invented diatomic molecule with a Morse potential, setting the separated-atom energy to zero:Here $a$ is an inverse length, $r_e$ the equilibrium bond length, and ${\omega }_e=a\sqrt{2D_e/\mu }$, with reduced mass $\mu$. These stipulated parameters describe a simple model, not a measured chemical substance. For the one-dimensional Morse oscillator, energy eigenvalues above the minimum areConsequently,The harmonic estimate $A/2=0.1000\mathrm{eV}$ is slightly larger than this model's exact zero-point energy. The physical bound-level restriction matters: the quadratic expression is not an infinite ladder of vibrational quantum states.

For a separate thermal illustration using this same stipulated $D_0$, assume an ideal gas, fully active molecular rotation of the parent, negligible thermal molecular vibration, and negligible electronic excitation for all species. Each monatomic product contributes $\delta h=5RT/2$; the diatomic molecule contributes $7RT/2$. Thus the net increment is $3RT/2$, with molar gas constant $R$. At $T=300\mathrm{K}$,This last result follows from the stated thermal model, not a universal correction for every chemical bond. Frozen rotations, accessible excited states, different fragment composition, or a condensed phase change the thermal increments.

A bond-dissociation enthalpy is the molar enthalpy change for the specified homolysis at temperature $T$, with reactant and products in specified standard states. Its usual units are $\mathrm{kJ}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$. The superscript $\circ$ specifies standard states; it does not fix $T$ to room temperature.^[ref]

Write $\delta h_i(T)=H_{m,i}^{\circ }(T)-H_{m,i}^{\circ }(0)$ for each species' molar thermal enthalpy increment. With $D_0$ an energy per parent molecule,Here $N_{\mathrm{A}}$ is the Avogadro constant. The thermal increments include translational kinetic energy, molecular rotation, thermally excited molecular vibration and electronic states when populated, and the $pV$ contribution to enthalpy. They are additional to the zero-point energies already included in $D_0$. If values of standard enthalpy of formation at the same $T$ are available, Hess's law gives the same quantity as ${\Delta }_f{H}^{\circ }(A)+{\Delta }_f{H}^{\circ }(B)-{\Delta }_f{H}^{\circ }(AB)$.

Units alone do not identify the convention. Multiplying either $D_e$ or $D_0$ by the Avogadro constant gives molar energy, but does not add thermal enthalpy. One electronvolt per dissociation corresponds to $96.485332\mathrm{kJ}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$. A spectroscopic wavenumber $\tilde{\nu }$ represents energy $hc\tilde{\nu }$, using the Planck constant $h$ and speed of light $c$; $1\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ corresponds to $0.011962657\mathrm{kJ}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$.^[ref]

The ground-state dissociation energy starts at the lowest vibrational quantum state, with the lowest allowed rotational quantum state and the fragment states explicitly specified. For a diatomic molecule whose fragments are ground-state chemical atoms, omitting any additional rotational correction,where $E_{\mathrm{ZP}}$ is the vibrational zero-point energy measured upward from the well minimum. The initial molecule already has this energy, so less additional energy is needed to reach the same final limit.^[ref]

For fragments that are themselves molecules, include their zero-point energies too. Define $D_e$ as the electronic energy difference between separately relaxed products and reactant; then, with consistent rotational conventions,Thus “subtract the parent's zero-point energy” is sufficient for atomic products but generally incomplete for molecular products. An excited final quantum state raises its channel threshold by its excitation energy; that threshold does not become the ground-product $D_0$ just because a detector selects it.

For a diatomic molecule, let $V(r)$ be the electronic potential energy at bond length $r$, with the atomic nuclei treated as fixed while finding the electronic energy. Choose zero at infinitely separated chemical atoms in the specified electronic quantum states. If the minimum occurs at $r_e$, the bond potential-well depth isThe bottom of this curve describes an equilibrium bond length, not an attainable motionless vibrational quantum state. Changing the zero of potential energy shifts both endpoints equally and leaves $D_e$ unchanged. A quantum harmonic oscillator approximates the curve near its minimum but rises without limit, so that local approximation alone cannot supply a dissociation asymptote. A Morse potential supplies both a minimum and a finite separated-fragment limit.^[ref]

If the two honest quantum state ensembles have the same density operator, their independently prepared blocks are perfectly hiding. A dishonest sender can instead send one half of a purification of a density operator and retain the other. The Hughston–Jozsa–Wootters theorem allows a measurement of the retained system to prepare either honest ensemble after commitment. If verification checks only the declared states, either opening is then accepted with the honest probabilities. This gives a concrete failure of binding while preserving perfect hiding.

Online text: openstax.org/books/biology-2e/pages/5-2-passive-transport

Cited passages: Biology 2e, §5.2, Tonicity in Living Systems and Figure 5.13: membrane withdrawal under hypertonic conditions; Biology 2e, §5.2, Tonicity in Living Systems, Figure 5.13: wall support and plasmolysis.

Online text: openstax.org/books/biology-2e/pages/24-1-characteristics-of-fungi

Cited passages: Biology 2e, §24.1, Cell Structure and Function: chitin and glucans; Biology 2e, §24.1, Cell Structure and Function: structural wall polysaccharides.

Online text: openstax.org/books/biology-2e/pages/4-3-eukaryotic-cells

Cited passages: Biology 2e, §4.3, Animal Cells versus Plant Cells and The Cell Wall: cellulose and animal comparison.

Online text: openstax.org/books/biology-2e/pages/22-2-structure-of-prokaryotes-bacteria-and-archaea

Cited passages: Biology 2e, §22.2, Figure 22.13 and The Cell Wall of Prokaryotes: wall-free bacteria and archaeal differences; Biology 2e, §22.2, Figure 22.16: inner membrane, peptidoglycan and outer membrane.

Online text: openstax.org/books/biology-2e/pages/10-2-the-cell-cycle

Cited passages: Biology 2e, §10.2, G0 Phase; Biology 2e, §10.2, Interphase and its G1, S and G2 subsections; Figure 10.5; Biology 2e, §10.2, The Mitotic Phase, Figure 10.6 and Cytokinesis.

Online text: openstax.org/books/biology-2e/pages/18-2-formation-of-new-species

Online text: openstax.org/books/biology-2e/pages/40-2-components-of-the-blood