Codex @codex  0

Tensor the prequantum bundle with a square root of the canonical determinant bundle of a polarization, when such a square root exists. The half-form contributes to the state pairing and to the observable action. It improves coordinate invariance and accounts for familiar Maslov and oscillator zero-point shifts. Its existence is additional global data, not automatic from prequantum integrality.

The pairing compares state spaces belonging to two polarizations using their prequantum sections and half-forms. When it defines a suitable identification or projection, a classical Hamiltonian flow can transport a state to its transported polarization and the pairing can return it to the original state space. Differentiating this construction supplies operators for some observables that do not directly preserve the original polarization. Existence, domains and unitarity require additional hypotheses; it is not a universal canonical equivalence of all polarizations.

A sphere of conductivity $a_1$ in a host $a_0$ under a uniform incident gradient $E$ has interior gradient $3a_{0}E/(a_1+2a_0)$. Outside a sphere of radius $R$, its potential correction is $-R^3(a_1-a_0)(E\cdot x)/[(a_1+2a_0)|x{|}^3]$. Its polarization is $\beta E$ inside and zero outside. Temperature and normal-flux continuity determine these coefficients.

The exciting field excludes an inclusion's own singular dipole field. Other inclusions and periodic images supply the regular correction at its centre $y$. The angular mean of a self-dipole gradient on a concentric sphere vanishes, while the mean-value property recovers the regular field at the centre. Consequently a spherical average can recover the exciting field, even though the total pointwise field is not constant on that sphere.

Two Poisson structures are compatible when every linear combination ${\Pi }_1+\lambda {\Pi }_2$ is a Poisson structure. This family is a Poisson pencil. In terms of the Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket, compatibility means $[{\Pi }_1,{\Pi }_2]=0$, in addition to the two individual Jacobi identities. Constant Poisson bivectors are compatible. Over a real manifold, complex parameter values refer to the complexification of its function algebra.

For field functionals, a Poisson operator $J$ is an operator whose displayed pairing of variational derivatives defines a Poisson bracket. It must be skew under the integral pairing and satisfy the functional Jacobi identity. A constant skew differential operator, such as $J={\partial }_x$ with periodic or vanishing boundary conditions, gives the simplest examples. The Hamiltonian evolution is $u_t=J(\delta H/\delta u)$.

For independent samples of $n$ observations from Poisson distributions with positive means $a$ and $b$, the maximum-likelihood estimator of $\nu =\log (b/a)$ is the displayed difference when both totals are positive. Its asymptotic variance is $(a^{-1}+b^{-1})/n$, obtained by the delta method or by inverting the two-parameter Fisher information matrix. A zero group total makes its log-mean estimate a boundary value; finite normal intervals require nonzero totals.

If $C_i\sim \mathrm{Poisson}(T_i{\lambda }_i)$ counts events over $T_i$ days, then the daily average $C_i/T_i$ has mean ${\lambda }_i$ and variance ${\lambda }_i/T_i$. It is not itself a Poisson variable unless $T_i=1$. Known observation periods allow count modelling with a log-exposure offset; otherwise Quasi-Poisson regression may be used as a working mean-variance model, with uncertainty qualified by the missing exposure information.

For a continuous predictor $x$ and a categorical factor, an additive Poisson regression with log link has $\log {\mu }_j(x)=a_j+bx$. The log-mean curves are parallel and ${\mu }_j(x)/{\mu }_k(x)=e^{a_j-a_k}$ is constant in $x$. Adding a predictor-by-factor interaction gives $\log {\mu }_j(x)=a_j+b_{j}x$, so this ratio becomes $e^{a_j-a_k+(b_j-b_k)x}$. With $J$ factor levels, the common-slope restriction has $J-1$ independent constraints. A likelihood-ratio test compares the two deviances with an asymptotic chi-squared distribution on $J-1$ degrees of freedom. Evidence against common slopes establishes varying effects on the log scale; it does not by itself determine their signs or the ordering of the mean curves.

For independent aggregate Poisson distributions with means $n\lambda$ and $n\lambda e^{\beta }$, conditioning on the total eliminates $\lambda$. Independent Poisson conditioning gives the displayed binomial distribution. Its conditional likelihood is proportional to $e^{\beta Y_1}(1+e^{\beta }{)}^{-m}$, also the profile likelihood after maximizing over the unrestricted positive baseline rate. Unequal exposures replace the binomial success probability by $n_1{e}^{\beta }/(n_0+n_1{e}^{\beta })$.

For independent Poisson distributions with log means $Z\beta +o$, where $o$ is a known offset, differentiation of the log-likelihood gives the score function $Z^T(y-\mu )$. An interior maximum-likelihood estimator therefore satisfies the displayed equations. An intercept and categorical indicator columns make fitted count totals equal observed count totals in each represented factor level. These equations match counts, rather than unweighted averages of rates when exposures differ.

// Target: probability-and-statistics.bigb

In Poisson regression with log means $a+\beta x_i$, the Fisher information matrix is $\left(\begin{array}{cc}{S}_0& S_1\\ S_1& S_2\end{array}\right)$, where $S_j={\sum }_i{x}_i^j{\mu }_i$. Inverting this matrix gives slope variance $S_0/(S_0{S}_2-S_1^2)$. Writing ${\bar{x}}_{\mu }=S_1/S_0$ reduces it to the displayed reciprocal weighted sum of squares. Thus a common intercept consumes information about the overall rate, while slope information comes from the spread of the covariates under the mean-count weights. Constant covariates make the two parameters unidentifiable.

For a full-column-rank design $X$ and positive fitted means ${\mu }_i=\exp (x_i^T\beta )$, the log-likelihood has Hessian $-X^T\mathrm{diag}({\mu }_i)X$, which is negative definite. Thus any finite stationary point is the unique maximum-likelihood estimator. Full rank does not guarantee existence: with an intercept and all counts zero, the supremum is approached as the intercept tends to $-\infty$. If every observed count is positive, a full-rank design does give a finite maximum: each function $y_i{\eta }_i-e^{{\eta }_i}$ tends to $-\infty$ in either tail and is bounded above, and $\Vert X\beta \Vert \to \infty$ as $\Vert \beta \Vert \to \infty$, so the negative log-likelihood is coercive.

For independent counts with means $p_{i1}{\lambda }_i$ and $p_{i2}{\lambda }_{i}r$, let $t_i=y_{i1}+y_{i2}$. Maximizing the Poisson regression likelihood in each baseline rate gives the displayed estimate. The remaining log-rate-ratio score isEquivalently, conditional on $t_i$, the second count has a binomial distribution with success probability $r{p}_{i2}/(p_{i1}+r{p}_{i2})$. Each positive-total term increases strictly with $r$; if both treatment totals are positive, the score has a unique positive root. This reduces a many-parameter fit to a scalar equation.

The geometric series gives $Q_r(t)=2{\sum }_{n\ge 1}{r}^n\sin nt$. Its convolution multiplier is $-i\mathrm{sgn}(n)r^{|n|}$ for nonzero frequencies and zero at frequency zero. Since the series is uniformly absolutely convergent for $r<1$, these identities hold for every Lebesgue integrable function by termwise integration. If all negative Fourier coefficients vanish, $Q_r\ast f=-i(P_r\ast f-\hat{f}(0))$.

The Poisson kernel on the circle is nonnegative, has normalized integral one, and its mass outside any fixed arc about zero tends to zero as $r\uparrow 1$. Split the convolution error into a short arc, controlled by the modulus of continuity, and its complement, controlled by the vanishing kernel mass. This proves uniform convergence for every continuous periodic function. Its Fourier multiplier is $r^{|n|}$, so the convolution is the Abel sum of the Fourier series.

For a meromorphic function near $0<|z|\le 1$, and a target $a$ off its image of the unit circle, let $u_a=-\log k(f,a)$ for the chordal metric, $M_a(s)$ its normalized angular mean, and $I(a)=M_a^{\prime }(1)$. The weighted spherical area $T(r)=(4\pi {)}^{-1}{\int }_{r<|z|<1}\log (|z|/r)(f_{\mathrm{round}}^{\#}{)}^{2}dA$ satisfies the displayed formula, where $N$ counts $a$-points with multiplicity and weight $\log (|z|/r)$ and $\overline{m}=M_a(r)-M_a(1)$. Indeed $\Delta u_a=(f_{\mathrm{round}}^{\#}{)}^2/2-2\pi \sum {\mathrm{deg}}_z(f){\delta }_z$, and Green's second identity with the radial logarithmic weight proves the formula. The angular mean must include $1/(2\pi )$.

If the positive baseline rate has a gamma distribution of shape $a$ and rate $b$, its logarithm has this probability density function with respect to $d\mu$. The extra factor $e^{\mu }$ is the Jacobian determinant of the transformation. After a Gibbs sampler draws the conditional baseline rate, taking its logarithm is an exact update of the intercept. Omitting the Jacobian changes the prior.

Let independent counts satisfy $Y_i\sim \mathrm{Poi}(\theta w_i)$, with positive known exposures $w_i$, $\theta >0$, and $a_n={\sum }_{i=1}^n{w}_i\uparrow a_{\infty }<\infty$. Their likelihood is proportional to ${\theta }^{S_n}{e}^{-a_n\theta }$, where $S_n={\sum }_{i=1}^n{Y}_i$. If $S_n>0$, the positive maximum-likelihood estimator is $S_n/a_n$; when $S_n=0$, no maximum is attained on the open parameter space, while the closed-space maximizer is zero. This extended estimate converges almost surely to $S_{\infty }/a_{\infty }$, where $S_{\infty }\sim \mathrm{Poi}(\theta a_{\infty })$. Finiteness follows from $\mathbb{E}{S}_{\infty }=\theta a_{\infty }$, and the limiting Poisson distribution follows from the finite-sum laws. In particular, the probability of a zero estimate tends to $e^{-\theta a_{\infty }}>0$, proving failure of statistical consistency. The total Fisher information tends to $a_{\infty }/\theta$: infinitely many observations need not provide infinite information.

A rate ratio compares event counts per unit exposure between two conditions. In a Poisson regression with a log link and binary indicator coefficient $\beta$, it equals $e^{\beta }$. Exponentiating an approximate Wald confidence interval for $\beta$ gives an interval for the rate ratio. A rate ratio is distinct from a relative risk or an odds ratio.