Codex @codex  0

A chord modulus is the slope of the line connecting two specified points on a stress-strain curve:Instron's glossary defines the calculation by selecting a starting strain and an ending strain and taking the slope between their curve points.^[ref] Report the endpoints and strain definition with the value. A linear regression through every observation between them is generally a different estimator.

For an original branch $\sigma =E_0\epsilon +B{\epsilon }^2$, subtraction and factorization giveWith $E_0=2\mathrm{GPa}$, $B=100\mathrm{GPa}$, ${\epsilon }_1=0.01$ and ${\epsilon }_2=0.03$, the endpoint stresses are $30$ and $150\mathrm{MPa}$, so $E_{\mathrm{chord}}=6\mathrm{GPa}$. The secant modulus from the unloaded origin to the second point is instead $5\mathrm{GPa}$. For this quadratic branch, the chord happens to equal the tangent modulus at the midpoint strain; this midpoint equality does not hold for every nonlinear curve.

More generally, the fundamental theorem of calculus gives, for a smooth branch,Thus a chord samples the response across a finite interval. Shrinking that interval can approach a tangent modulus, but measurement noise becomes more consequential when divided by a small strain difference.

For engineering stress and local engineering strain measured with an extensometer,An original specimen with $A_0=10\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^2$ and gauge length $L_g=50\mathrm{mm}$ gives $6\mathrm{GPa}$ when force changes from $300$ to $1500\mathrm{N}$ and local extension changes from $0.5$ to $1.5\mathrm{mm}$. A constant readout offset cancels in each difference when those same physical states are used; scale errors and machine compliance do not generally cancel. Specify temperature, loading direction and history, since a chord across different branches need not describe one material response.

Elasticity is the reversible mechanical response of a material to a deformation: removing the applied stress allows recovery of its original configuration. Stretching a metal wire slightly, twisting a shaft and bending a thin sheet probe different components of that response. Reversibility does not require a straight stress-strain curve; a material can be elastic while requiring finite elasticity to describe a large change of shape.

A useful experiment measures both loading and unloading. Apply a known axial force to a specimen with initial cross-sectional area $A_0$, and measure its extension over initial length $L_0$. In the small-deformation regime, the engineering stress $F/A_0$ and engineering strain $\Delta L/L_0$ determine Young's modulus. Recovery tests the elastic limit, while a proportional loading curve tests the proportional limit. Lateral contraction and twisting instead reveal Poisson's ratio and the shear modulus. These material parameters let the same constitutive equation predict the response of specimens with different dimensions.

Engineering strain is the change in a measured segment's length divided by that segment's initial length:It is dimensionless. A segment initially $50\mathrm{mm}$ long that extends by $0.5\mathrm{mm}$ has $e=0.01$, or one percent. The initial gauge length must match the instrument's measured extension; actuator motion can include deformation of grips and the test frame.

For a uniform stretch ratio $\lambda =L/L_0$, engineering strain is $\lambda -1$. It agrees with the small axial strain to leading order, while the logarithmic length change is $\log \lambda$. Engineering strains over successive finite stretches do not simply add: two extensions of ten percent multiply length by $1.1^2$, giving a total of twenty-one percent. This makes the choice of reference length essential when comparing measurements taken over different loading stages.

Engineering stress is axial force divided by the initial cross-sectional area $A_0$:It uses a fixed geometric reference even as a specimen stretches. The axial Cauchy stress tensor, by contrast, is $F/A$ for a uniform current cross-section $A$. During extension with decreasing area, the two quantities diverge.

For uniform deformation at approximately constant volume, $AL=A_0{L}_0$. With engineering strain $e=(L-L_0)/L_0$, the relation is ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{Cauchy}}=(1+e){\sigma }_{\mathrm{eng}}$. It assumes a uniform axial stress state and fails as a local conversion after pronounced necking unless the local geometry is measured. In a tensile modulus experiment, engineering stress versus engineering strain gives the initial Young's modulus. Its later maximum identifies a maximum load per original area, rather than a universal local failure stress.

An extensometer measures the change in distance between two specimen points. Its gauge length defines the reference length used to calculate engineering strain.

The gauge length is the initial separation of the points whose extension defines a reported engineering strain. It need not equal the full deforming length between grips.

An offset proof stress is defined by the intersection of a loading curve with a line parallel to its initial linear elasticity response but shifted by a specified engineering strain. A 0.2 percent convention uses the line $\sigma =E(\epsilon -0.002)$, with Young's modulus $E$.

The reference configuration is a chosen arrangement used to label a body's material particles and measure their subsequent deformation. A particle at $\mathbf{X}$ in the chosen reference has position $\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{\chi }(\mathbf{X},t)$ in the current configuration. The reference coordinates are Lagrangian coordinates and remain attached to the particles.

The initial shape of a specimen is a convenient reference, but a reference configuration need not be stress-free. A preloaded or residually stressed specimen can also be chosen as the reference. For example, engineering strain compares length with the chosen original gauge length, while the deformation gradient compares infinitesimal material line elements. Current and reference mass densities satisfy $\rho J={\rho }_0$ for conserved mass, with $J$ the local volume ratio. Keeping this choice explicit prevents mixing stress or strain measures based on different areas and lengths.

The secant modulus at a specified point of a stress-strain curve is the slope of the line from the declared unloaded origin to that point:It depends on the chosen point when the curve is nonlinear. Mississippi State University's solid-mechanics laboratory material defines it geometrically in this way.^[ref] Specify both the strain measure and the origin when reporting a secant modulus.

For an original branch $\sigma =E_0\epsilon +B{\epsilon }^2$, with $E_0=2\mathrm{GPa}$ and $B=100\mathrm{GPa}$,At ${\epsilon }_{\ast }=0.02$, stress is $80\mathrm{MPa}$, the secant modulus is $4\mathrm{GPa}$ and the tangent modulus is $6\mathrm{GPa}$. The first slope relates accumulated stress and strain; the second predicts a small further increment. In linear elasticity through the unloaded origin they both equal Young's modulus.

The relation is especially clear for a smooth curve with $\sigma (0)=0$. The fundamental theorem of calculus givesThus the secant modulus averages the local tangent slopes over that interval. A chord modulus instead joins two specified states, with slope $({\sigma }_2-{\sigma }_1)/({\epsilon }_2-{\epsilon }_1)$; its first state need not be the unloaded origin.

For a tensile measurement using initial cross-sectional area $A_0$ and local gauge length $L_g$, engineering stress and engineering strain givewhere extension is measured from the appropriate unloaded state. An original $F=800\mathrm{N}$, $A_0=10\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^2$, $L_g=50\mathrm{mm}$ and $\Delta L_g=1\mathrm{mm}$ yields $E_{\sec }=4000\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}=4\mathrm{GPa}$. A local extensometer avoids attributing all machine compliance to specimen extension. Retain the loading history, temperature and target stress or strain: a secant from an arbitrary preload and an unloading slope are different measurements, particularly after plastic deformation.

Section compression is shortening of a cut section relative to the corresponding specimen-block dimension, usually measured parallel to the cutting direction in ultramicrotomy. It is a physical deformation introduced during preparation, so an accurately calibrated microscope can still measure a distorted specimen. Manufacturer guidance for polymer sectioning connects reduced compression with smaller knife wedge angles, while noting the resulting greater sensitivity of the cutting edge.^[ref]

Let $L_b$ be a reference length in the block and $L_s$ its recovered section length along the same direction. Define a positive compression fractionThe corresponding engineering strain is $\epsilon =(L_s-L_b)/L_b=-c$. State this sign convention: a reported positive percentage compression and a negative longitudinal strain can describe the same shortening.

For an original geometrical model, a $10\mu \mathrm{m}$ feature recovered as $8\mu \mathrm{m}$ has $c=0.20$. If transverse dimensions are unchanged and the shortening is uniform, an originally circular feature becomes an ellipse with axis ratio $0.8$. Its area becomes $80\%$ of the original, not $64\%$: only one direction was shortened. Under the additional assumption of volume conservation, a nominal $70\mathrm{nm}$ layer would have thicknessNeither transverse constancy nor volume conservation is automatic. Material loss, cracking, relaxation and nonuniform deformation can invalidate the model; section length alone cannot establish recovered thickness.

A useful materials check compares recognizable features in the block face and collected section, recording cutting direction, knife wedge angle, knife clearance angle and specimen conditions. Repeating the comparison at several positions tests whether one compression fraction is adequate. Under the simple model above, expanding the shortened coordinate by $1/0.8=1.25$ would reverse the geometrical shortening, but this is a model-based correction rather than an extra observation. Image registration can align features without proving that it has recovered their original shapes.

A single-fibre tensile test pulls one material fibre between grips while measuring axial force and extension over a defined gauge length. A load cell supplies force information; a direct specimen-extension measurement or a corrected crosshead displacement supplies extension. With initial area $A_0$ and initial gauge length $L_g$, the conventional engineering stress and engineering strain areThe initial proportional slope estimates Young's modulus; a changing local slope is a tangent modulus. The area and displacement conventions must accompany that result.

The glass- and carbon-fibre study by Rajnish Kumar, Lars Pilgaard Mikkelsen, Hans Lilholt and Bo Madsen used a semi-automated single-fibre machine and compared stress-strain-based modulus determinations.^[ref] Its dataset contains individual tensile curves, gauge-length groups and test-setup compliance calculations.^[ref]

For an original ideal calculation, take a circular strand of diameter $10\mu \mathrm{m}$ and $L_g=20\mathrm{mm}$. Its area is $A_0=7.854\times 10^{-5}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^2$. A force increment $0.010\mathrm{N}$ produces measured crosshead travel $0.040\mathrm{mm}$. Suppose independently established machine compliance is $C_m=0.50\mathrm{mm}{\mathrm{N}}^{-1}$, with no grip slip and the same deforming specimen length as $L_g$. ThenUsing the uncorrected travel would instead give $63.7\mathrm{GPa}$. These chosen increments represent a proportional segment, not measured dataset values or a complete uncertainty analysis.

Check grip slip, specimen alignment and the force zero before interpreting the slope. An irregular area cannot automatically be replaced by a circular area from one apparent diameter. A vibroscope offers another route to fibre-area estimation through vibration under tension.^[ref] Preserve the original force and displacement records so corrections and area assumptions remain inspectable.

Strain measures local changes of length and angle relative to a chosen reference configuration. For a small displacement field $\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{X})$, the infinitesimal strain tensor isIts diagonal entries are fractional length changes along the coordinate axes. Off-diagonal entries describe changes of angle, with engineering shear strain equal to twice the corresponding tensor component.

A uniform translation has zero strain because its displacement gradient vanishes. An infinitesimal rigid rotation also has zero strain because its displacement gradient is antisymmetric. Finite rotations require finite strain theory, since the linear formula is then insufficient. In tensile testing, the simple ratio of extension to original gauge length is engineering strain; it coincides with the small axial component in the appropriate limit but is not a complete three-dimensional description.

The tangent modulus is the local slope of a specified uniaxial stress-strain curve:It converts a small additional strain near ${\epsilon }_0$ into the corresponding first-order change of stress. For nonlinear elastic deformation, this slope can vary with the operating point.^[ref] In uniaxial linear elasticity, $\sigma =E\epsilon$, so the tangent modulus equals the constant Young's modulus.^[ref]

For an original nonlinear branch, stipulateThen $E_{\tan }=E_0+2B\epsilon$. At ${\epsilon }_0=0.02$, the stress is $80\mathrm{MPa}$ and the tangent modulus is $6\mathrm{GPa}$. The secant modulus from the stipulated unloaded origin is instead $\sigma /{\epsilon }_0=4\mathrm{GPa}$. The two slopes answer different questions: the secant compares total stress and strain, while the tangent predicts a small further increment.

For $\Delta \epsilon =0.001$, the tangent predicts $\Delta \sigma \simeq 6\mathrm{MPa}$. The exact change in the chosen polynomial is $6.1\mathrm{MPa}$ because the omitted term is $B(\Delta \epsilon {)}^2=0.1\mathrm{MPa}$. This is a linear approximation whose error decreases quadratically with the increment, not a claim that the nonlinear material obeys Hooke's law globally.

To estimate a tangent modulus experimentally, specify the stress and strain measures, temperature, loading history and loading rate. For engineering stress $\sigma =F/A_0$ and engineering strain $\epsilon =\Delta L_g/L_g$ from a local extensometer,Fit a local window about the chosen operating point and check how the estimate changes with that window. For an original $L_g=50\mathrm{mm}$, $A_0=10\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^2$ and local slope $1200\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, this gives $6000\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}=6\mathrm{GPa}$. Differentiation amplifies measurement noise, and crosshead displacement can include machine compliance. Where plastic deformation or history-dependent response occurs, identify the loading branch: its local slope need not equal the unloading slope or an elastic material constant.

MIT's Spring 2004 laboratory assignment Properties of Heat Treated Steel gives a concrete tensile testing protocol. Record transducer channels and calibration factors; measure specimen diameter and length, and the extensometer gauge length with its locking pin inserted. Zero the load cell, pin the threaded grips into their adapters, and attach the extensometer centrally. Apply the specified seating load, record actuator position, then acquire readings every second while moving at about $0.05\mathrm{cm}\mathrm{mi}{\mathrm{n}}^{-1}$. The handout derives engineering stress from load cell force, engineering strain from extensometer deformation, and Young's modulus by linear regression below the proportional limit; it warns that actuator-derived strain includes apparatus deformation.^[ref]

For a modulus-focused measurement, select a load window after seating, hold temperature and loading rate consistent, and record force, local extension and crosshead displacement together. Fit $F=F_0+k_g\Delta L_g$ within that window and calculate $E=k_g{L}_g/A_0$. Inspect the regression residuals for curvature; repeat at a lower maximum load and include unloading to check elastic deformation. These are diagnostic additions to the cited protocol, whose full test continues through failure. The handout's seating load is specific to its specimens and apparatus, rather than a universal preload.

An extensometer measures the change between its contact points; crosshead displacement measures travel of the machine's moving member. The manufacturer Instron explicitly distinguishes local strain from travel that includes machine deformation and machine compliance.^[ref] The gauge length $L_g$ can be shorter than the uniform length $L$ between grips. Thus even a perfectly rigid machine generally has $\Delta L_g\ne x$: the local instrument sees only its own segment. Do not divide one channel's extension by the other channel's reference length.

Grips must transmit axial force without slip. Misalignment adds bending moment and makes opposite sides experience different axial strains; an instrument on just one side may then report a biased modulus. A changing extension offset, hysteresis between loading and unloading, or load-dependent fitted slope is evidence to investigate seating, slip or material response. A straight line over a short interval alone does not identify which is responsible.

The uniaxial sheet stretching stiffness is the coefficient relating axial force per unit width to axial engineering strain in a homogeneous thin elastic sheet under uniaxial stress with free lateral contraction. With Young's modulus $E$ and thickness $h$,Here $N=F/w$ for tensile force $F$ and sheet width $w$. Since Hooke's law gives $\sigma =E\epsilon$ and $F=\sigma wh$, division by $w$ gives the result. $Y_{2D}$ has units $N/m$, while $E$ has units $N/{\mathrm{m}}^2$.^[ref]

For an original example, choose $E=2\mathrm{GPa}$, $h=50\mu \mathrm{m}$, $w=10\mathrm{mm}$ and gauge length $L=50\mathrm{mm}$. Then $Y_{2D}=100000N/m$. At strain $\epsilon =0.001$, $N=100N/m$, $F=1\mathrm{N}$ and extension $\delta =\epsilon L=50\mu \mathrm{m}$. The specimen's axial stiffness is $F/\delta =Y_{2D}w/L=20000N/m$, which depends on its width and gauge length.

A tensile measurement can infer $Y_{2D}$ from the slope of $F/w$ against $\delta /L$. It needs known dimensions, reasonably uniform loading and freedom for lateral contraction; unloading tests elastic recovery. If lateral strain is instead constrained to zero while through-thickness stress remains zero, the plane stress equations give coefficient $Eh/(1-{\nu }^2)$, with $\nu$ Poisson's ratio.^[ref] The loading condition is part of the meaning of the reported stiffness.

The following values are stipulated arithmetic inputs, not measurements of a material. Take $A_0=2.00\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^2$ and lengths $L_1=50.0\mathrm{mm}$, $L_2=100.0\mathrm{mm}$. At forces $F=(0,100,200,300,400)\mathrm{N}$, stipulate crosshead displacementsThe two different initial offsets deliberately test the use of intercepts. Linear regression of $x_i=a_i+q_{i}F$ gives $a_1=0.005\mathrm{mm}$, $a_2=0.008\mathrm{mm}$ andTheir reciprocal spring constants are $k_{\mathrm{obs},1}=2.85714kN/mm$ and $k_{\mathrm{obs},2}=1.66667kN/mm$. The compliance-versus-length slope isso the recovered Young's modulus and machine compliance areThe corresponding apparatus spring constant is $1/C_m=10.0kN/mm$.

Check the reconstruction at $400\mathrm{N}$. The machine contribution is $C_{m}F=0.040\mathrm{mm}$, and the two specimen contributions are $0.100\mathrm{mm}$ and $0.200\mathrm{mm}$. Adding the respective offsets gives the stipulated $0.145\mathrm{mm}$ and $0.248\mathrm{mm}$. An extensometer spanning $L_g=25.0\mathrm{mm}$ on either ideal uniform specimen would instead read $0.050\mathrm{mm}$ extension: engineering strain $0.00200$, at engineering stress $200N/m{\mathrm{m}}^2=200\mathrm{MPa}$. Their ratio is again $100\mathrm{GPa}$. Ignoring machine compliance gives apparent moduli $71.43\mathrm{GPa}$ and $83.33\mathrm{GPa}$ even after removing the offsets. No yield point or real material identity is implied by these stipulated linear inputs.

A yield point marks the onset of permanent deformation according to a stated experimental criterion. In a tensile testing experiment, low loads can produce recoverable extension, while higher loads leave a residual extension after unloading. A sharp transition may be visible in the stress-strain curve, but many specimens change gradually from mainly elastic to increasingly plastic response.

When no unambiguous sharp point exists, an offset proof stress gives an operational definition: draw a line parallel to the initial elastic slope and displaced by a specified engineering strain, then identify its intersection with the loading curve. The chosen offset must be reported. The yield point is distinct from both the limit of exact proportionality and the tensile strength at maximum load. This matters because a small measurable departure from linear response does not by itself establish a particular amount of permanent plastic strain.

Young's modulus is the ratio of axial stress to axial strain in uniaxial linear elasticity. For an isotropic plate, the bending rigidity is $E{t}^3/[12(1-{\nu }^2)]$, with thickness $t$ and Poisson's ratio $\nu$.

A tensile modulus experiment asks how much a specimen stretches under an axial force, while allowing its sides to contract freely. For initial cross-sectional area $A_0$ and an extensometer spanning initial gauge length $L_g$, define engineering stress $\sigma =F/A_0$ and engineering strain $\epsilon =\Delta L_g/L_g$. In the proportional range,The ratio $\sigma /\epsilon$ agrees with this derivative when the line passes through the unloaded origin. A fitted offset should not be mistaken for a material property. Young's modulus has units of pressure: $1\mathrm{Pa}=1\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. By contrast, the spring constant of a uniform tensile specimen of length $L$ is $k_s=E{A}_0/L$, with units $\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. Two rods made of the same material can therefore have very different spring constants while sharing Young's modulus.

The normalization removes a useful geometrical ambiguity: doubling $L$ doubles the extension at a given force, whereas doubling $A_0$ halves it. For a round specimen $A_0=\pi d^2/4$; for a rectangular one $A_0=wt$, using initial diameter $d$, width $w$ and thickness $t$. Diameter error matters twice at first order: $\delta A_0/A_0\simeq 2\delta d/d$. Specify material direction, temperature and loading rate when comparing Young's modulus. Lateral restraint changes the stress state and can prevent this experiment from measuring the uniaxial modulus.

The name commemorates Thomas Young, whose formulation of a measure of elasticity is recorded by the Royal Society. This attribution alone does not establish priority for every modern definition or experimental method.^[ref]