Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 73 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take and use . The case is flat spacetime and is not a black hole. In the nontrivial extremal Reissner-Nordstrom metric,The horizon is a double zero at , with surface gravity . The function is positive on both sides of the horizon. Thus the intermediate nonstatic region of a nonextremal charged hole disappears; one must not draw that region as a strip of nonzero width in the extremal Penrose diagram.
To construct the Penrose diagram, first integrate the radial tortoise coordinate:The additive constant has been chosen so that in the inner block. In the exterior, at and at infinity. In the inner static region , it increases from to . Set and . The radial metric is , so its radial null directions are and .
Compactify each static block usingThis conformal compactification puts radial null geodesics at degrees. The exterior is a diamond: its right-hand edges are past and future null infinity, while its left-hand edges are the past and future degenerate horizons. At the left vertex, finite static and give , . This is an end of the infinite spatial throat, not a regular bifurcation surface where the two horizon branches meet. A degenerate Killing horizon has no such bifurcation sphere. The inner block occupies the half-diamond , because there. Its vertical edge is the timelike curvature singularity ; its two diagonal edges are the two horizon branches at . Its outer vertex likewise represents an excluded infinite-throat end.
The static-coordinate compactification identifies the blocks but does not by itself establish the smooth horizon extension. For that, use Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates on the future horizon:Its radial determinant is , so it is nonsingular at . Glue the exterior future edge, with finite, to the inner past edge, with the same finite . The outgoing coordinate similarly gives and extends the other horizon branch. Continue adjoining these regular blocks across every extendible null edge. The construction repeats indefinitely to the future and past, producing the maximal analytic diagram with infinitely many asymptotic exterior regions and inner static regions bounded by timelike singularities. Horizons are null edges, never the excluded throat vertices. Identical edges in different copies must be glued with their time orientations preserved; they are not all the same exterior infinity.
Exterior and inner Penrose building blocks of an extremal charged black hole; the marked edges glue in ingoing coordinates and open circles are excluded throat ends
. Details. The figure shows the two building blocks, rather than compressing the whole infinite extension into a misleading finite diagram. The red edges glue across a future horizon at finite advanced time. Outgoing coordinates extend the next edge to another exterior copy. The thin diagonal lines illustrate the radial light-cone directions.
For spatially conformally flat coordinates, compare the radial and angular parts of with . The angular coefficient requires , and the radial coefficient then gives, in the exterior,Choose the integration constant to make and at infinity. In Cartesian coordinates , , , put . The Extremal Reissner-Nordstrom isotropic coordinates giveThese coordinates have and describe the exterior only. The locus is the limit , not an ordinary point included in this chart. An independent inner chart is obtained with , , giving and ; it must be attached using the regular null coordinates, not by continuing the exterior radial coordinate through a Cartesian origin.
The infinite proper distance is real. Along a constant- exterior radius,It is a property of a static spacelike slice. It does not bound the proper time of a freely falling observer. Indeed, a neutral radial timelike geodesic has conserved energy per unit rest mass and normalization , givingAt the horizon , so the remaining proper time is finite. Moreover,The observer crosses the regular future horizon with finite and finite proper time. This is the Extremal Reissner-Nordstrom causal crossing, which the singular static time coordinate conceals.
There is also a direct causal test for the event horizon. Inside the future horizon, outgoing radial null curves in the ingoing chart satisfy . To reach from below they would requireNear the horizon, . A future timelike or nonradial null curve cannot increase faster than the outgoing radial null curve, since and imply after dropping the nonnegative angular term. Hence a signal that crossed inward cannot return to the original exterior's future null infinity. Curves can encounter other blocks in the maximal analytic extension, but their infinities are not the original observer's infinity. Relative to that asymptotic end, is the boundary of the causal past of future null infinity: it is an event horizon.
Finally, the Reissner-Nordstrom trapped spheres test explains why the proposed observation is unsurprising. Normalize future radial null normals by , , with . The round-sphere null expansions areThere is no region of strictly future-trapped round spheres, while the horizon spheres are marginal with . Absence of those particular trapped surfaces does not imply absence of an event horizon. The geometry has a nonzero horizon area and a genuine timelike singularity at in its extension. The infinite static throat does not remove the black hole: infall crosses its horizon in finite proper time, and no signal returns to the same exterior infinity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 56 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . A positive-radius horizon requires a root of , givingFor the usual asymptotically flat Reissner-Nordstrom spacetime, the black-hole conditions areThe strict inequality gives a nonextremal outer event horizon at ; equality gives an extremal black hole. If with , there is no horizon and the central curvature singularity is naked. Nonpositive cannot supply a positive-radius black-hole horizon; is Minkowski spacetime. For , the zero root is the singularity, not an additional regular horizon.
In the static coordinates the vector has constant components and every metric component is independent of . Its Lie derivative therefore satisfiesFor the torsion-free Levi-Civita connection, , proving the Killing equation directly. This also normalizes the Killing vector field to unit time translation at infinity.
At , . Use the regular advanced chart with , in whichOn the horizon, . Thus the Killing vector field is both null and normal to the horizon, and its orbits generate that Killing horizon. The normal lines of a null hypersurface are null geodesics, possibly with nonaffine parameter. To see this without assuming a separate geodesic property, the Killing equation givesRestriction to the future horizon therefore givesThe acceleration is proportional to the tangent, which is exactly the geodesic equation with a nonaffine parameter. An affinely parametrized tangent can be obtained by rescaling along each generator; that rescaled vector need not itself extend to a spacetime Killing vector field. At a nonextremal bifurcation surface, vanishes, so a nonzero generator tangent must be described in a regular affine parametrization there.
On the past branch, use the retarded chart with radial-time cross term . Now at the horizon, so the same calculation yields the opposite signed nonaffinity. Since is constant and the spacetime is spherically symmetric, is constant over the future horizon. This gives the two signs in the horizon relation without assuming their value beforehand.
Factor . Its derivative at the outer horizon gives the Reissner-Nordstrom horizon surface gravityIt is positive for , and at reduces to the Schwarzschild surface gravity . For , the root is double and . Thus the horizon remains present when its surface gravity vanishes: it is a degenerate Killing horizon, and itself has affine parametrization along its nonzero horizon generators. The strictly positive-constant description applies only to the nonextremal case; the zero value is the legitimate extremal limit.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 57 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A stationary black hole behaves mechanically like an equilibrium thermodynamic system. Its horizon area A, asymptotic energy E, angular momentum J and electric charge Q are linked by the laws of black-hole mechanics. Let generate its Killing horizon, with the time translation normalized at infinity; its surface gravity is defined by on that horizon. We use and keep G explicit. The horizon electrostatic potential is measured relative to infinity.
The Zeroth law of black-hole mechanics states that kappa is constant on each connected stationary horizon, under the Einstein equations and suitable energy/regularity assumptions. It parallels the zeroth law of thermodynamics, which makes temperature uniform in equilibrium. Kappa need not be constant in a dynamical geometry. For an asymptotically flat static hole, local observers see gravitationally redshifted temperatures; the equilibrium quantity comparable to kappa is the temperature referenced to infinity.
The First law of black-hole mechanics relates nearby stationary solutions:The same leading relation describes a small physical process which perturbs a horizon and subsequently settles to equilibrium, with the appropriate hypotheses on fluxes and final state. The work terms correspond to rotational and electromagnetic work. The structural analogy with the first law of thermodynamics, , identifies area as an entropy-like variable and surface gravity as a temperature-like variable. Classically this fixes their product in the first law, rather than their separate normalizations.
The second law of black-hole mechanics, or black-hole area theorem, states that future event-horizon area does not decrease classically. Its essential geometric ingredient is the Raychaudhuri equation for affinely parametrized null generators. In four dimensions a hypersurface-orthogonal congruence obeysThe null energy condition and Einstein equations make the last term nonpositive. If the expansion became negative, the inequality would focus the generators to a conjugate point in finite affine parameter. Under future completeness and predictability assumptions, that would conflict with their remaining on an achronal event horizon. Thus , and the area element, satisfying , cannot decrease. For a merger the final area is at least the sum of the initial component areas. These assumptions matter: the theorem is a classical statement, not a prohibition of quantum evaporation.
The third law of black-hole mechanics is an unattainability statement: a nonextremal hole cannot be driven to zero surface gravity in a finite physical process satisfying the usual bounded-stress and regularity conditions. This parallels the unattainability form of the Third law of thermodynamics. Extremal stationary solutions exist, so the law concerns how an initially nonextremal hole approaches them. The stronger entropy form of Nernst's theorem does not transfer unchanged: extremal holes can have finite area and entropy, depending on their conserved charges.
Quantum field theory turns the mechanical analogy into a physical thermodynamic identification. Hawking radiation is thermal at infinity to leading semiclassical order, withThese give exactly, so the mechanical first law becomes the thermodynamic first law with Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Scattering through the exterior adds greybody factors to the emitted spectrum but leaves this temperature identification intact. Equilibrium with an external bath and isolated evaporation are different physical states of the field.
During black-hole evaporation, the area can decrease because the semiclassical stress tensor need not satisfy the classical null energy condition. The proposed generalized second law applies instead to , asserting nondecrease of the combined entropy. A Schwarzschild hole illustrates an unusual thermodynamic property: , so its heat capacity is negative. It becomes hotter as it loses energy and is unstable in a simple canonical heat bath, while entropy and energy laws still describe an isolated system. The quantum temperature, area entropy and generalized second law supply the correspondence; the mechanical laws alone do not establish a thermal emission spectrum or a microscopic entropy count.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 57 4 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Suppress the angular three-spheres and use radial null coordinates , with . Compactifying these null coordinates puts radial light rays at 45 degrees in the Penrose diagram. Simple zeros of V give logarithmic ends of the tortoise coordinate and are crossed by regular null charts. The sign of V distinguishes static blocks, where r is spacelike, from inter-horizon blocks, where r is timelike.
The center is a genuine curvature singularity. An orthonormal-frame calculation gives the Kretschmann scalar of a five-dimensional charged black holeIt diverges at zero radius and is finite at positive horizons. Since the normal to a constant-r hypersurface has squared norm V, the singular boundary is spacelike when V is negative near zero and timelike when V is positive there.
For , V is negative inside the sole horizon and the maximal extension is Schwarzschild-like: two asymptotically flat exteriors, a future black-hole triangle ending at a spacelike singularity, and a past white hole triangle beginning at a spacelike singularity. The two pairs of horizon branches meet at a regular bifurcation sphere.
For , V is positive for every positive r. The radial conformal domain is a single exterior with a timelike naked singularity at its left boundary and the usual past/future null infinities on its outer boundaries. There is no horizon. These two cases are shown together below; red zigzags denote curvature singularities.
Neutral and overcharged radial Penrose diagrams in five dimensions
. Details. For , the exterior and deep interior are static, while is a trapped or time-reversed band. The outer roots are event horizons for a chosen exterior, and the inner roots are Cauchy horizons. The center is timelike because there. In the exact analytic extension, crossing successive inner and outer horizon branches produces an infinite succession of exterior, trapped, inner-static and white hole blocks. The following finite strip specifies the repetition; it does not terminate the spacetime at the drawing's upper or lower edge.
Repeated nonextremal charged blocks with outer and inner horizons and timelike singularities
. Details. For , is nonnegative on both sides of . There is no inter-horizon trapped band. Near the horizon, , so the horizon is an infinite throat end of each static coordinate block. It is null and degenerate, without a regular bifurcation surface. The extension consists of alternating exterior and inner-static blocks, with timelike singularities in the latter. The separate conformal blocks below, together with their future-to-past horizon gluing rule, describe the full repeated extension. The open throat endpoints are ideal boundaries, not additional events where horizon branches meet.
Extremal static conformal blocks and the gluing rule for their maximal extension
. Details. Thus the neutral, strictly subextremal charged, extremal and overcharged cases all have distinct causal structures. These drawings describe the maximal analytic stationary metrics. The additional angular dimension changes areas and curvature falloff, but does not change these radial causal block types.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 57 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A positive-radius horizon occurs at a zero of V. Set ; multiplying by gives . Thus real roots require . With , the horizon condition and radii areFor both roots are positive, giving an outer event horizon and an inner Cauchy horizon. For they coincide at . For only is a horizon: the formal root was introduced by multiplication and is the singular origin, where the original expression for V is undefined. For there is no horizon and the central singularity is naked. Each positive root is regular in ingoing coordinates , where the radial metric is .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 60 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The physical spherical coordinates cover , , , and with periodic identification. The center and the polar axes are the usual coordinate singularities, rather than physical curvature singularities; a regular polar chart restricts and . For the null coordinates,Thus the physical metric tensor isThe conformal transformation followed by , gives , , andConsequently . Finally , converts to , yieldingThe ranges must retain their joint constraints:Equivalently, and , with . The angles retain their original ranges and identifications. Extending to negative values would double-count the radial polar geometry. The conformal factor isThe unphysical metric tensor extends onto the Einstein static universe, while physical Minkowski spacetime occupies the triangular region in its radial Penrose diagram. The edge is the regular center and belongs to the physical region away from its endpoints.
The conformal boundary consists of the following infinities. Future null infinity has , hence with , and corresponds to finite with . Past null infinity has , hence , and corresponds to finite with . Future timelike infinity is , past timelike infinity is , and spacelike infinity is . Although angles label points on null infinity, their two-spheres collapse at these three endpoint locations in the compactified picture.
The radial Minkowski conformal diagram and the endpoints of timelike, null and spacelike geodesics
. Details. For the geodesic endpoints in Minkowski conformal compactification, one can check the limits directly. A timelike inertial trajectory is with . At both and tend to , so and the trajectory ends at future timelike infinity. At both tend to , giving past timelike infinity. This includes a stationary inertial worldline with bounded .
For a null inertial trajectory, . As , , so has a finite limit while ; its future endpoint lies on future null infinity. As , , giving a finite limiting and , hence a past endpoint on past null infinity. Radial null geodesic paths have constant. A ray passing through the center changes its angular direction; in the angle-suppressed radial diagram it reflects at rather than terminating there.
A spacelike geodesic is also a straight line, now parametrized so that . At either end, asymptotically, , , and the endpoint is spacelike infinity. A radial spacelike line at has two opposite-angle halves which project onto the same horizontal interval in the diagram.
The conformal compactification endpoints occur at finite but at infinite physical proper time or affine parameter; Minkowski spacetime is geodesically complete. The conformal preservation of null geodesic paths does not preserve an affine parameter: if is physically affine, an unphysical affine parameter satisfies up to a constant. Along a complete null ray this can have a finite integral at infinity. Timelike and spacelike physical geodesic paths are not generally geodesics of the rescaled metric tensor, so their drawn curves must not be interpreted as freely falling unphysical observers.
Finally, every physical event can send an outgoing null ray to future null infinity, so is all of Minkowski spacetime. Its black-hole region and intrinsic event horizon are empty. The null edges in the diagram are infinity, not horizons concealing part of the physical manifold. Complete inertial observers likewise have no observer event horizon. Accelerated observers restricted to a Rindler wedge can have a Rindler horizon, but that is observer-dependent and does not contradict the horizon-free Minkowski spacetime. The conformal diagram compactifies infinity; it does not introduce a physical horizon.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 62 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use geometrized units and positive mass . The Schwarzschild metric initially describes an exterior region, not the whole black hole:Here is the areal radius and is Schwarzschild time, normalized at infinity. We must distinguish a removable coordinate singularity from a genuine curvature singularity. The Kretschmann scalar isIt is finite at and diverges at . Thus can be crossed in a better chart, whereas cannot be made a regular point by changing the coordinate chart.
First integrate the Schwarzschild tortoise coordinate:The radial metric becomes . Set ; the Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates giveThe radial block has determinant minus one and smooth coefficients at , so it extends through the future Schwarzschild event horizon. Its ingoing radial null geodesics have constant , while the outgoing radial null geodesics obey . In the future interior both future-directed radial null families decrease ; is therefore an unavoidable future boundary for causal motion there. The outgoing chart similarly gives , extending through the past horizon. A single one of these null charts does not display both horizons or the entire extension.
To regularize both horizons together, introduce Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates in the original exterior:ThenFor the right side defining decreases monotonically from one to minus infinity. In fact its derivative is . Thus it determines a unique smooth wherever , including . At the radial metric coefficient is finite and nonzero, proving actual regularity of both horizons and their intersection, rather than merely relabelling the old coordinate divergence. Allowing all real with produces the simply connected maximal analytic extension, the Kruskal spacetime.
There are four regions of the Kruskal spacetime. The original exterior is ; a second asymptotically flat exterior is . The future black hole has and ; the past white hole has and the same range of areal radius. The horizon branches are and . Their intersection is a regular bifurcation surface, a two-sphere of radius , not the centre of the spacetime. Each point of the radial diagram represents a symmetry two-sphere.
Put and . Radial null geodesics have slopes , and the curvature singularities haveThe upper branch is the future spacelike Schwarzschild singularity; the lower branch is the white hole past singularity. The Killing vector field extends as . It is future directed in the original exterior and past directed in the other exterior for the chosen global time orientation; inside, this stationary vector is spacelike. In the future interior, is a time coordinate decreasing toward the singularity. For example, a radial infaller of unit specific Killing energy obeys and reaches from the horizon in finite proper time . The curvature divergence and this geodesic endpoint show why the extension stops there.
For the global causal picture, compactify the null coordinates using , and let , . The conformal compactification rescales the metric to remove the coordinate factors from the radial metric while preserving its null directions. Since gives on the two singular branches, they become the horizontal lines . The resulting Penrose diagram displays the two exteriors, each with its own past null infinity, future null infinity and spatial infinity, plus the future and past interiors. The singularities are spacelike boundaries; the horizons are interior null surfaces. Future event horizons separate events that can escape to an exterior's future null infinity from events in the black-hole interior.
Kruskal and compactified diagrams of the maximal Schwarzschild extension, showing both exteriors, horizons and spacelike singularities
. Details. The time-symmetric spatial slice has a bridge between the exteriors, but it is not a traversable passage. Future-directed causal curves have nondecreasing and . Moving from the right exterior to the left would require to decrease from positive to negative; the reverse passage would require to decrease. Both are impossible. This proves the non-traversability of the Schwarzschild bridge. The complete eternal vacuum extension has two exteriors, a black hole and a white hole; it has no causal route between its exteriors. A black hole made by stellar collapse is a different global spacetime: its matter-filled past replaces the white hole region, and it normally has only one exterior. The vacuum extension constructed here should not be mistaken for the collapse history of a single star.
With electric charge, spherical electrovacuum instead gives the Reissner-Nordstrom metric, in an electromagnetic normalization absorbing the charge conversion constants:For , there are two simple horizons. Outside the metric is static; between and , and is timelike. Inside , again, so is spacelike and the singularity is timelike. The outer horizon is the event horizon; the inner horizon is a Cauchy horizon. The same logarithmic tortoise-coordinate and exponential-null-coordinate method crosses each simple horizon locally, but one exponential scale does not regularize both simultaneously: their surface gravities have different magnitudes,Continuing the exact metric through successive inner horizons produces repeated blocks with further exteriors, and evolution beyond a Cauchy horizon is not uniquely fixed by data on the original Cauchy hypersurface. The timelike singularity can be avoided by some trajectories in this ideal extension, unlike the unavoidable spacelike singularity of the future Schwarzschild spacetime interior. However, the enormous inner-horizon blueshift makes this exact continuation unstable: perturbations can cause mass inflation. This is an important qualification on the global structure of a charged spherical black hole.
At the two horizons coalesce, and surface gravity is zero. The horizon is a degenerate Killing horizon, the tortoise-coordinate divergence becomes a pole and the ordinary nondegenerate Kruskal spacetime construction must be replaced. The exterior develops an infinitely long spatial throat and the formal Hawking temperature vanishes. For , no real zero of remains: the electrovacuum solution has a naked singularity, not a black hole. Consequently arbitrarily allowing charge changes the causal structure, not just the horizon radius.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 62 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use Planck units for the following formulas. The black-hole area theorem is a classical statement with hypotheses. Assume the Einstein field equations, the null energy condition and appropriate global future regularity/predictability. For a clean version of the focusing sketch, take the future horizon generators to remain on a regular horizon and to be future complete in affine parameter. The usual strong asymptotic predictability formulation supplies the global causal control needed to exclude the same focusing pathology; an arbitrary spacetime with naked future breakdown is not covered by the theorem.
Let be an affinely parametrized generator of a smooth portion of the event horizon, and let be its null expansion. The horizon is a null hypersurface, so its generators have zero null twist. In four dimensions the Null Raychaudhuri equation isThe Einstein field equations give , since the metric terms vanish when contracted with a null vector. The screen-space null shear term is also nonnegative, so . If at , integrating this inequality while the congruence remains regular givesIt focuses within affine distance at most . The vanishing area element is a focal point to an earlier spacelike horizon cut. Past such a point the null geodesic can no longer generate an achronal boundary, but the event horizon is precisely such a boundary. Future completeness and the global hypotheses exclude its escaping this contradiction by ending prematurely at a pathology. Therefore everywhere the smooth horizon description applies.
Integrate between ordered horizon cuts. Every continuing generator contributes a nondecreasing area element. New generators can enter at past endpoints or merger crease sets, adding area; generators cannot leave a regular future horizon through future endpoints under these hypotheses. Thus, including the total area of disconnected components,This is the future-complete horizon focusing proof of the area theorem. A smooth elementary congruence proof requires the stated regularity; the general theorem also treats the horizon's nonsmooth joining set rather than assuming mergers have a globally smooth horizon.
Hawking radiation changes the situation because the quantum field state in a collapsing geometry is not a classical positive-energy fluid. For a large isolated Schwarzschild black hole,in natural units. Outgoing quantum modes at future null infinity have a nearly thermal occupation, modified by greybody factors; an accompanying negative Killing energy flux near the horizon reduces the hole's mass. On timescales short compared with the evaporation time but long compared with , its geometry is approximately Schwarzschild spacetime with slowly decreasing . It is not an exactly stationary vacuum solution with a parameter changed by hand: the radiation's stress-energy tensor sources the time dependence through the semiclassical Einstein equation. The distant luminosity is carried by the outgoing radiation, while the horizon-area decrease accompanies the inward negative-energy contribution.
As the black hole loses mass, its horizon scale and Bekenstein-Hawking entropy shrink, its temperature rises and its luminosity increases. This is the negative heat capacity of a Schwarzschild black hole. Large astrophysical holes evaporate extremely slowly in isolation; small holes evaporate more rapidly, and increasingly massive particle species become accessible as the temperature rises. An incoming radiation bath or accretion can instead offset the loss, so the pure evaporation law assumes negligible incoming energy. A formal complete evaporation also raises the black hole information paradox; the low-curvature calculation alone does not determine how information or the final state is resolved.
For an elementary luminosity estimate, treat the horizon as emitting photon blackbody radiation. In natural units the Stefan–Boltzmann law has , givingThe horizon area used here is an estimate of emitting area, not the exact frequency-dependent absorption cross-section. More generally write , where includes the greybody factors and the active particle species. For constant effective , energy balance and direct integration giveHere is time measured at infinity. The formal evaporation timescale is ; with the photon blackbody estimate it is . Restoring constants givesfor that specified estimate. If particle thresholds make mass dependent, the precise leading law is instead . The robust result is the inverse-square mass-loss rate for a fixed species regime and the cubic mass scaling of its lifetime. This is the semiclassical cubic mass law for Schwarzschild evaporation. Extrapolating its zero to a definite end state is unjustified once approaches the Planck mass and curvature requires quantum gravity.
There is no contradiction with the classical area theorem: the renormalized quantum stress-energy tensor can violate the null energy condition used in the focusing inequality. In the evaporation regime,which is permitted when that hypothesis fails. The thermodynamic replacement is the generalized second law, concerning rather than horizon area alone. Outside radiation can carry entropy while the hole's Bekenstein-Hawking entropy decreases.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 62 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use geometrized units until converting the clock readings. By the Birkhoff theorem, the spherical vacuum exterior is a portion of the Schwarzschild spacetime with fixed mass :The exterior is not flat and is not radiating merely because the surface moves. When the surface crosses , this exterior must be represented in regular Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, rather than treating the Schwarzschild-coordinate divergence as a physical barrier.
The Oppenheimer-Snyder model has a homogeneous pressureless matter interior. Since its initial expansion vanishes but its density is positive, the Friedmann equation requires positive spatial curvature. Choose a comoving radial angle and the boundary's proper time , with the stopwatch set to zero at release. The interior FLRW metric and density areThe density law follows from the dust stress-energy tensor and its covariant conservation. The Friedmann equation and the initial rest condition giveIts contracting branch has the parameterizationIndeed and satisfy the displayed equation; is the turning point and is the final curvature singularity.
For homogeneous dust-ball matching, the boundary has areal radius . Matching its mass to the exterior givesThis is the gravitational mass parameter, not the integral of rest density over the curved proper-volume element. The matching can also be checked directly. The outward angular extrinsic curvature inside is ; outside it is . The boundary motion hasso these curvatures agree. The induced metric is on both sides and because the pressure-free boundary is geodesic. No artificial surface stress layer is required.
The observer moving with this boundary meets the event horizon when . From , the proper-time horizon crossing in homogeneous dust collapse occurs atThe singularity is reached at , so the remaining clock time isThese are finite proper times, even though the external static time diverges at horizon crossing.
Convert the supplied rounded units consistently: Planck masses and Planck lengths. Thus , , and in Planck units. Multiplying geometric times by seconds givesAt the accuracy justified by the rounded constants, these are about three milliseconds to horizon crossing and about seven microseconds more to the singularity. For , expanding gives , independently confirming the microsecond scale. The exact expression above retains the finite release-radius correction.
Strictly, this boundary clock reading is when the observer crosses the horizon, not when the horizon first exists anywhere. The event horizon inside an Oppenheimer-Snyder cloud is an outgoing radial null ray. Since , the interior metric is conformal to , and that ray has . Tracing it back from givesFor this cloud it starts at the centre after release, at comoving time seconds. This answers the literal global-formation interpretation as well; it is not an event on the outer observer's worldline. The distinction matters because an event horizon is defined by the entire future causal escape problem, not by a locally detectable signal of formation.
For the observer at infinity, use the boundary's conserved Killing energy in the exterior:As , and . Consequentlywhere fixes a harmless dimensionless logarithm. For actual outgoing light signals the relevant retarded time is . Since ,Therefore she never receives a signal showing the surface cross the horizon at any finite asymptotic time. Radiation emitted ever closer to crossing arrives ever later and is increasingly redshifted and diluted; photons emitted at or inside the event horizon cannot reach her. The formal crossing time at infinity is infinite, not the finite boundary stopwatch reading. Nor can the earlier global birth of the horizon be observed directly as a local flash from its central birth event.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 72 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let and use the velocity-anisotropy parameter , with . Here the tangential variance is per component; a definition using the sum of both tangential variances instead has an extra factor of two. The original PDF has this correct per-component ratio, which the TeX corrupts.
At a point along the line of sight, . The radial direction makes an angle with the sightline satisfying . Spherical symmetry eliminates mixed moments, and projection givesUsing both sides of the galaxy and ,For this formula use as the projected density of the same tracer represented by . If is a mass density and an observed surface brightness, a constant mass-to-light ratio rescales by that factor; otherwise replace by the luminosity density throughout the tracer equation. The gravitating remains the total mass, not necessarily the tracer's mass.
The Spherical Jeans equation is . Eliminate from the projected integrand:Rearranging provesNo constancy of was needed. Convergence of the projected moments and the steady spherical assumptions are required. This is the integral form of the projected spherical Jeans residual.
Although has disappeared explicitly, the unknown radial pressure still carries the orbital information. Thus the identity does not remove the mass--anisotropy--density degeneracy: projected brightness and one projected second moment do not uniquely determine both and the radial/tangential partition. A central rise in velocity dispersion can reflect a compact central mass, radial orbital bias, or a changing mass-to-light ratio; flattening and departures from equilibrium add further ambiguities.
For example, within a point-mass-dominated region with tracer and constant , direct solution gives . For the projected velocity dispersion of a Keplerian cusp isThe beta function factors come from setting in the integrals along the line of sight. Different allowed generally change the mass needed to fit the same normalization; is a special cancellation, not the general case. Resolving the central black-hole sphere of influence and constraining orbital structure with higher velocity moments or additional kinematic directions strengthens a compact-mass inference. Brightness and velocity dispersion profiles alone do not establish a unique central black-hole mass, still less an event horizon.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ii Paper 3 10D a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a homogeneous isotropic metric, radial light propagation covers comoving distance . The physical particle horizon is , when this is finite. A future event horizon exists when is finite. The Hubble radius is the instantaneous scale , with ; it is not generally the same as either causal horizon.
For an Einstein-de Sitter universe, , so , while from a beginning at zero. The future integral diverges, so there is no event horizon. For an eternal-past de Sitter spacetime, is constant and the particle-horizon integral from diverges. Its event horizon and Hubble radius both equal . Thus a Hubble radius is not automatically a particle horizon, even in these simple isotropic models.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ii Paper 4 36C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Birkhoff theorem states that every spherically symmetric vacuum solution of Einstein's equations with zero cosmological constant is locally Schwarzschild, with a constant mass parameter. In particular its exterior vacuum geometry is locally static even if the spherical material source moves. Assuming no exterior matter or outgoing matter radiation, the region outside the collapsing star is vacuum with its conserved total mass , so the given Schwarzschild metric is appropriate there. Spherical gravitational radiation does not provide an extra time-dependent vacuum degree of freedom. Matter emission would invalidate the vacuum premise.
Use units and signature as in the displayed metric. For a radial timelike geodesic, stationarity gives conserved energy per unit mass . Proper-time normalization giveson the ingoing branch. At the horizon , so , with for an infaller from the exterior. Henceis finite near the horizon. If release is from rest at a finite radius, the integrable square-root behavior at the release point also gives finite elapsed proper time. Thus the observer crosses the horizon in finite proper time; the Schwarzschild coordinate singularity is not a physical barrier.
By contrastso diverges. Schwarzschild time is the limiting proper time of stationary observers at infinity. For actual signals, an outward radial null ray adds a propagation delay involving ; signals emitted ever closer to the horizon reach a distant observer ever later and increasingly redshifted. No signal emitted at or inside the event horizon reaches that observer. Thus “seeing crossing only after infinite time” means an asymptotic observational limit, not an eventual finite-time sighting.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 63 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let and . The geometry is the five-dimensional Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric. Introduce a tortoise coordinate by . Decomposing the integrand givesAn irrelevant additive constant has been fixed. Set and . Substituting or respectively gives the Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates and Outgoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates:The radial-time block in each has determinant , so the apparent singularity at has disappeared. The ingoing chart crosses the future event horizon, and the outgoing chart crosses the past horizon. Radial null geodesics in the ingoing chart obey either or , displaying how outward light is trapped when .
For the maximal extension, the exterior radial metric is . Since the surface gravity is , choosein the right exterior. Their product and the extended metric areThe coefficient at the horizon is finite and nonzero, . The product relation therefore extends smoothly through either horizon. For , gives two exterior regions. For , gives the future black-hole interior with and the past white-hole interior with . The Kruskal extension of the five-dimensional Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric has a bifurcation three-sphere at .
The singularity corresponds to . It is a curvature singularity: for example, its Kretschmann scalar is . Since in the interior, constant- surfaces are spacelike there, and the singularities are spacelike boundaries. Define , , then compactified coordinates , . Radial null curves have . Moreover, gives at the two singularities. This constructs the Penrose diagram, not just its horizon labels:
Maximal five-dimensional Schwarzschild-Tangherlini extension with two exteriors, future and past horizons, and spacelike singularities
. Details. Each point away from the singular boundaries represents a three-sphere, not a two-sphere. The diagram has two asymptotically flat exteriors with separate past and future null infinities, a future black hole and a past white hole. The diagram of a collapse spacetime would omit the second exterior and the white-hole region; the maximal extension of the metric given here contains both.
For the Komar integral, normalize the stationary Killing vector field as , with unit norm at infinity. The Killing equation makes antisymmetric, and its divergence is proportional to . In a vacuum exterior this vanishes, so Stokes theorem makes the flux independent of the enclosing sphere. In the weak-field limit its radial component measures the derivative of the gravitational potential; its large-sphere flux is therefore proportional to the asymptotic gravitational mass. Normalization of is needed because rescaling it would rescale the integral.
Specify the surface orientation to fix the sign and factor. On a static exterior slice take future unit normal , outward radial normal andThen and , with both antisymmetric components included. Since ,The three-sphere area is , and . ThusReversing the binormal orientation gives ; a convention with half the antisymmetric binormal gives half this magnitude. The question does not fix those conventions, so the choice above is explicit.
For comparison with physical mass, the Komar mass normalization in higher dimensions isIn five dimensions this givesThe metric parameter has dimensions of length squared and is not itself the physical mass. An independent horizon check is with , which reproduces the same integral. The dimension-adjusted normalization also agrees with the ADM mass; the four-dimensional Komar prefactor should not be reused unchanged.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 63 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The black-hole area theorem is a statement about classical future event horizons, with both a local focusing condition and global horizon regularity assumptions. Assume the null energy condition, an appropriately predictable exterior and no future termination of horizon generators before the focusing argument can be applied. Future-complete generators provide a particularly direct sufficient version of the last assumption. Strong asymptotic predictability is the usual global condition used to exclude the pathological alternatives; the energy condition by itself is not the whole theorem.
On a smooth part of the horizon, choose a future-directed affinely parametrized generator and affine parameter . Its expansion is the fractional rate of change of an infinitesimal transverse area element:The horizon is a null hypersurface, so its generator congruence is hypersurface-orthogonal and has zero twist. The transverse screen metric is positive definite, hence . In four dimensions the Null Raychaudhuri equation isThe Einstein field equations and the null energy condition imply the null convergence condition , so .
Suppose at . As long as the congruence remains smooth, integrating shows focusing within affine distance at most . Equivalently, comparison with the equality solution givesIts denominator tends to zero at finite future affine parameter. The corresponding transverse area collapses, giving a conjugate point to a spacelike surface. Beyond a focal point a generator cannot remain on an achronal boundary, since nearby points can then be joined by a timelike curve. But a regular future event horizon is such a boundary, and its generators cannot leave it to the future. With the stated future-extension assumption this is a contradiction. Therefore on the smooth horizon.
Following generators from one horizon cross-section to a later one now gives a noncontracting area map. Generators entering at past endpoints or merger crease sets can add area, whereas the global hypotheses exclude generators disappearing from the future horizon. ConsequentlyThis is the future-complete horizon focusing proof of the area theorem. In spacetime dimensions, the coefficient is replaced by and the same proof gives a focusing distance at most . It therefore also applies to the three-dimensional horizon cross-sections of the preceding five-dimensional example.
A cosmological constant does not invalidate the local focusing step. Contract the modified Einstein field equations with the null generator. Since , both the scalar-curvature term and the term disappear:Thus a cosmological constant preserves null convergence, whatever its sign. Under suitable global assumptions for the relevant asymptotic region, the black-hole area argument still works. A nonzero changes the asymptotic geometry and can introduce cosmological horizons, so the statement concerns the appropriate future black-hole horizon; it is not an assertion that every horizon-like surface automatically obeys the same area ordering.
A classical real canonical massless scalar field also preserves the area theorem's energy condition. Its stress tensor hasThis proof is independent of whether the field gradient is spacelike, timelike or null: the metric term vanishes and the remaining real square is nonnegative. It is the null energy condition for a canonical scalar field. Adding this field to other matter satisfying the null energy condition retains null convergence. With the same global regularity assumptions, area still cannot decrease; when the derivative along a generator is nonzero, it supplies an additional nonnegative focusing source.
The conclusion uses the given minimally coupled classical stress tensor. A wrong-sign kinetic term or a nonminimal curvature coupling would require another calculation. Likewise, a renormalized quantum stress-energy tensor need not obey the classical pointwise condition; the quantum radiation considered next is not covered by this classical proof.






