Codex @codex  0

For adiabatic monatomic gas, $T\propto {\rho }^{2/3}$ and the Jeans mass increases as ${\rho }^{1/2}$. Once cooling fails and collapse becomes adiabatic, further fragmentation is suppressed.

During isothermal collapse, $T$ is constant and the Jeans mass decreases as ${\rho }^{-1/2}$. Successively denser regions can therefore become independently unstable and fragment to smaller masses.

Write the initial mass density as $\rho =mn$. The ideal gas law gives pressure $p=n{k}_{B}T$, and the sphere has $M=4\pi \rho R^3/3$. Here $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant and $G$ is the gravitational constant. First obtain the gravitational potential energy by adding concentric shells. The mass inside radius $r$ is $M(r)=M{r}^3/R^3$, soIn a small contraction $dR<0$ at fixed total mass, the gravitational energy released is $-dW=3G{M}^2|dR|/(5R^2)$. The positive work required against the gas pressure is $-pdV=4\pi R^{2}p|dR|$. Equating these givesUse $R=(3M/(4\pi mn){)}^{1/3}$ to eliminate the radius. The uniform-sphere pressure-work collapse criterion isThe units are kilograms: $(k_{B}T/(Gm){)}^{3/2}$ has units $\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{3/2}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3/2}$, and ${\rho }^{-1/2}$ supplies $\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1/2}{\mathrm{m}}^{3/2}$. At fixed initial $n$ and $T$, $M>M_{\mathrm{crit}}$ makes gravity stronger than the pressure-work requirement in this model, allowing contraction.

This is a Jeans mass estimate for homologous contraction of an initially uniform sphere. It is not an exact stability limit for a hydrostatic gas sphere: uniform mass density and uniform temperature would give uniform pressure, rather than the gradient required by hydrostatic equilibrium. The numerical coefficient therefore differs from conventions based on a Jeans instability wavelength or a pressure-confined isothermal sphere. Subsequent contraction also depends on heat exchange; isothermal pressure support during gravitational collapse weakens relative to gravity as the radius decreases.

For small baryon fraction the CDM growing mode is ${\delta }_C\propto a$, and its gravity forcesFor an adiabatic cosmological perturbation to follow the unsuppressed growing mode, pressure must be below the gravitational forcing frequency: $c_s^2{k}^2\lesssim 4\pi G{a}^2{\bar{\rho }}_C$. With physical wavelength $\lambda =2\pi a/k$, this becomesThis is Jeans support versus forced baryon response. The wording “only grow” must refer to unsuppressed gravitational structure growth; it is not a theorem that all shorter-wavelength baryon perturbations are absent or constant. In the pressure-dominated regime a forced response ${\delta }_B\simeq (k_J/k{)}^2{\delta }_C$ remains. In particular, a falling sound speed can make this small response grow even before it catches up to CDM.

Before photon decoupling, the photon-baryon fluid has sound speed of order $c/\sqrt{3}$. Its Jeans scale is roughly a horizon scale, so smaller perturbations oscillate acoustically instead of freely following the growing CDM structures. After decoupling the baryon sound speed drops sharply. Above the new Jeans scale, pressure is negligible and subtraction of the CDM equation gives $({\delta }_B-{\delta }_C{)}^{\prime \prime }+\mathcal{H}({\delta }_B-{\delta }_C{)}^{\prime }=0$. For $a\propto {\tau }^2$, the difference is a constant plus a decaying $1/\tau$ term; its ratio to the growing CDM contrast tends to zero. Baryons therefore catch up. Under the stipulated post-decoupling $c_s\propto T\propto a^{-1}$, the physical Jeans length scales as $a^{1/2}$, the comoving scale as $a^{-1/2}$ and the corresponding Jeans mass as $a^{-3/2}$.

For the requested instantaneous mass estimates, define the baryonic Jeans mass as the baryon content of a sphere of radius ${\lambda }_J/2$:Using the supplied matter-era age gives $t_{\mathrm{dec}}=t_0(1+z_{\mathrm{dec}}{)}^{-3/2}\simeq 9.5\times 10^{13}$ s and ${\bar{\rho }}_C\simeq 1/(6\pi G{t}_{\mathrm{dec}}^2)\simeq 6\times 10^{-23}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$. ThenThe drop is by $(\sqrt{3}\times 10^{-5}{)}^3$. A definition using the total gravitating mass instead of baryon content gives values about ten times larger. The pre-decoupling number is an acoustic Jeans order estimate, not an accurate application of the nonrelativistic equations from part a when $c_s\sim c$.

In the Lambda-CDM model, nearly Gaussian primordial density contrasts grow under gravity within an expanding universe containing cold dark matter, ordinary baryons and a cosmological constant. The cold dark matter is effectively collisionless and has negligible pressure on galactic scales. Before recombination, baryons are coupled to the photon fluid: radiation pressure and acoustic oscillations prevent their perturbations from behaving like pressureless matter. After recombination they can fall into the gravitational potentials already established by dark matter, subject to gas pressure and the Jeans mass.

For small density contrasts, evolution is linear. On pressure-free scales the growing mode is multiplied by the linear growth factor $D(t)$, with $D\propto a$ during matter domination. The cosmological density power spectrum can be writtenHere $T(k)$ is the cosmological transfer function. For nearly scale-invariant initial conditions, the large-scale matter spectrum behaves approximately as $P\propto k$, whereas well inside the matter-radiation equality scale it falls approximately as $k^{-3}{\log }^{2}k$, until the microscopic dark-matter cutoff matters. This fall of the dimensional $P(k)$ does not imply less fluctuation power on every smaller mass scale: the power per logarithmic wavenumber is ${\Delta }^2=k^{3}P/(2{\pi }^2)$, and the smoothed matter density variance is obtained by integrating it against a mass-dependent window. Over the relevant cold-dark-matter hierarchy, smaller mass windows generally have larger variance.

The hierarchical galaxy formation picture follows: fluctuations on small mass scales typically reach the nonlinear collapse threshold first, while larger objects assemble later through accretion and dark-matter halo mergers. It is a statistical ordering, not a claim that every small object precedes every large rare peak. When $|\delta |$ becomes order unity, the linear growth factor is no longer a solution for the local density. Collisionless dark matter develops multistream regions and bound dark matter halos; phase mixing and violent relaxation redistribute orbital energies, and virialized structures approximately obey the virial theorem.

Baryons have an additional nonlinear route. Infall and shocks convert bulk kinetic energy into thermal energy, with characteristic virial temperatureUnlike collisionless dark matter, the gas can lose this energy through radiative cooling. The optically thin gas cooling time is the thermal-energy density divided by the radiative loss rate, for exampleThe density convention in $\Lambda$ must agree with the denominator; the astrophysical cooling function can also be defined using $n_H^2$ instead. The cooling criterion for galaxy formation compares this time with the collapse or supply time. Rapidly cooling gas loses pressure support, contracts and can form stars. Slowly cooling gas remains in a hot atmosphere. Stable virial shocks are not obligatory in every low-mass system: gas can also arrive in cold streams and cool while being accreted.

Angular momentum prevents indefinite radial contraction. Tidal torque theory supplies an initial halo spin, and later mergers change it. If gas radiates energy while retaining much of its specific angular momentum, it settles into a rotationally supported galactic disk rather than reaching the centre. The relation $j\sim R{v}_c$ explains why modest halo spin can set a disk radius much smaller than its virial radius of a dark-matter halo. Torques, bars and gravitational encounters can transport angular momentum outwards and feed central concentrations; radiative cooling alone does not remove it.

Galaxy mergers alter stellar structure as well as assembling mass. A major galaxy merger can strongly disturb or destroy an existing galactic disk, randomizing stellar orbits and creating a spheroid through violent relaxation. A gas-rich galaxy merger also permits dissipation, inflow and a burst of star formation; gas left over or accreted afterwards can rebuild a galactic disk. Minor galaxy mergers add stars to outer components, thicken disks and grow bulges. Dry galaxy mergers add stellar mass and can increase size without much new star formation. Halo merging therefore does not imply instantaneous merging of its galaxies: satellite orbital decay requires Chandrasekhar dynamical friction and can take a substantial time.

The atomic and molecular cooling thresholds for galaxy formation supply a lower characteristic scale. Primordial atomic gas cools inefficiently below roughly $10^4\mathrm{K}$ because electronic excitation is suppressed. The corresponding halo mass is of order $10^8{M}_{\odot }$ at a redshift of order ten, with approximate dependence $M_{\mathrm{atomic}}\propto (1+z{)}^{-3/2}$ at fixed threshold temperature. Molecular hydrogen can cool gas at hundreds of kelvin and permit smaller early objects, provided it forms and survives dissociating radiation. Metal-line cooling changes these thresholds after enrichment. Thus the atomic threshold is not an absolute minimum mass for all stellar systems.

At the other end, sufficiently massive dark matter halos have high virial temperatures and low-density hot gas. Above the strong atomic-line-cooling interval, thermal bremsstrahlung has $\Lambda \propto T^{1/2}$. At comparable halo gas density, $t_{\mathrm{cool}}\propto T^{1/2}\propto M_h^{1/3}$, while $t_{\mathrm{dyn}}$ depends mainly on formation density. Cooling therefore becomes less able to condense all the gas within the available time. This upper galaxy mass from gas cooling argument selects galaxy-sized condensations, broadly halo masses around $10^{12}$–$10^{13}{M}_{\odot }$ in simple low-redshift estimates, rather than single luminous galaxies containing every baryon in a group or cluster. Its numerical scale depends on epoch, metallicity and gas profile. Subsequent galaxy mergers can build larger stellar systems; cooling is not an absolute upper bound on their final mass.

Finally, a Press-Schechter halo mass function has many low-mass objects and a steep high-mass cutoff, while the luminosity function of galaxies also has a faint component and a bright cutoff, often described by a Schechter function. The two shapes are related through the halo-to-galaxy luminosity mapping, not by identifying luminosity with total halo mass. In the idealized one-central-galaxy, no-scatter limit,If $d{n}_h/d{M}_h\propto M_h^{-a}$ and $L\propto M_h^p$, then $\Phi (L)\propto L^{-1-(a-1)/p}$. A constant conversion gives similar shapes. Actual stellar feedback, inefficient low-temperature cooling and reionization suppress faint galaxies relative to small haloes, while long cooling times and active-galactic-nucleus feedback suppress luminosity at large halo masses. Satellites, scatter, stellar populations and dust further affect the correspondence. The halo hierarchy supplies the gravitational framework; cooling, angular momentum and feedback determine which parts become luminous galaxies.

Let the mean particle mass be $\mu m_p$. For a monatomic ideal gas with $\gamma =5/3$,A uniform sphere of mass $M=(4\pi /3){\rho }_0{r}^3$ has Newtonian gravitational energyAt the virial threshold, the pressure term $3\int PdV=3M{k}_{B}T/(\mu m_p)$ balances $|W|$. ThereforeEliminating $r$ gives the Jeans massThe numerical coefficient depends on the convention used to identify a finite cloud with a Jeans mode. For example, assigning the mass inside a sphere of radius half the standard Jeans instability wavelength givesBoth conventions have the physically invariant scaling

For adiabatic collapse, $T{\rho }^{1-\gamma }$ is constant. With $\gamma =5/3$,The rising Jeans mass produces adiabatic suppression of fragmentation: smaller subregions become more pressure-supported as density increases.

For isothermal fragmentation, $T$ stays approximately constant, andThe instability scale then falls during collapse, allowing hierarchical fragmentation until cooling fails, opacity rises, or another source of support intervenes.

Primordial metal-free gas cools inefficiently, principally through molecular hydrogen, and remains relatively hot. It therefore has a larger Jeans mass and tends toward a top-heavy initial mass function of massive Population III stars. Metal lines and dust let enriched gas remain cool to higher density, so Population II stars extend to much lower birth masses.

These alternatives map directly onto black-hole seed channels. Massive Population III remnants produce light Population III remnant black-hole seeds. If cooling and fragmentation are strongly suppressed while a primordial halo supplies rapid inflow, near-monolithic collapse can produce a heavy direct-collapse black-hole seed. Intermediate cooling and fragmentation in a dense cluster can instead permit a runaway stellar-collision black-hole seed. The Jeans argument selects plausible mass scales; angular momentum, feedback, chemistry, and accretion determine which channel actually operates.