Standard gravitational parameter Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
The product of the gravitational constant and a central mass sets the strength of the exterior Newtonian gravitational field. Its dimensions are length cubed divided by time squared. In the exact relative two-body problem, the parameter is ; using for one source assumes the test particle approximation.
The combination is useful because orbital and falling-body observations constrain directly. A gravitational circular orbit of radius has oscillation period , so measuring and gives . That measurement alone does not separately determine and . Similarly, radial free fall from rest has a natural time scale .
Other interactions require a different model. Inverse-square radiation pressure can reduce the effective attraction for a dust Kepler orbit; calling that effective coefficient a gravitational parameter must not hide the added force.
Stellar gravity Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
Outside a spherical star, its gravitational acceleration is . It provides the dominant central force for Kepler orbits in a star-dominated planetary system.
Half the peak-to-peak line-of-sight orbital velocity range of a star in a single-companion Kepler orbit. It equals , where is the stellar barycentric semi-major axis, the orbital period, the sky-plane orbital inclination, and the orbital eccentricity. The Doppler spectroscopy formula follows from Kepler's third law for the relative orbit, .
A superintegrable Hamiltonian system with degrees of freedom has more than functionally independent integrals of motion, including an integrable set of in involution. At a regular nonzero Hamiltonian vector field, at most independent integral differentials can annihilate the flow. A maximally superintegrable system attains that bound. The three-dimensional Kepler orbit has five independent integrals through energy, angular momentum and the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector. A closed orbit on one isolated resonance is weaker than maximal superintegrability on an open phase-space region.
The same initial distance can lead to strikingly different orbits. Let and launch tangentially in one orbital plane. Then periapsis is the launch point, specific angular momentum is , and
where is true anomaly. These follow by combining the initial specific orbital energy with the orbital eccentricity relation and the Kepler orbit equation. With and , the initial speeds , , , and give : a circular orbit, an elliptic orbit with apoapsis distance , a parabolic trajectory, and a hyperbolic Kepler orbit. The two open paths have asymptotic speeds zero and respectively. Their different directions at large distance are part of the Kepler orbit, not an extra scalar escape threshold.
Figure 1.
Tangential launches give circular, elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic Kepler orbits
. All panels use equal spatial scales, a fixed attracting centre at the origin, a launch point , and an initially upward velocity. The gray body's radius is stipulated as , so all displayed paths remain exterior. Colored solid curves follow motion after launch; dashed curves on the open orbits are their incoming extensions, not an additional part of the launch. Open curves continue beyond the viewing window. The normalized launch speeds and specific orbital energies are computed from the stated isolated model. Details.
Three-body orbit 2026-10-25
A trajectory whose dynamics require gravitational forces from more than one attracting body. Around a synchronously rotating moon, a maintained trajectory involving the planet–moon system is distinct from a simple moon-centred stationary Kepler orbit; the moon's Hill sphere limits the latter approximation.
Tisserand periapsis bound 2026-10-07
For bound planet-crossing Kepler orbits, , with the planet radius taken as one. At fixed , is maximized by and . For this gives . This form remains regular at . It is an invariant-based accessibility bound, not a guarantee that a scattering history attains it; for it gives no positive universal pericentre floor.
For a small planet on a nearly circular Kepler orbit, a stellar chord at normalized transit impact parameter has length . Dividing by transverse orbital speed gives the duration. A central transit has the longest duration within this approximation. Eliminating with Kepler's third law yields for known mean stellar mass density. Finite planet radius, appreciable orbital eccentricity, and corrections change the bound.
True longitude 2026-10-14
True longitude is the conventional orbital angle formed from the longitude of ascending node, argument of periapsis and true anomaly. For a coplanar Kepler orbit it is the actual polar longitude of the position vector. For an inclined orbital plane the sum of angles is generally not the projected azimuth. The mean longitude uses mean anomaly in place of , so . For small orbital eccentricity, Kepler's equation gives , while the eccentric-to-true anomaly relation gives ; hence . This periodic difference matters when separating a slow resonant argument from a rapidly varying geometric angle.
Virial theorem Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-13
The virial theorem relates the average value of a function along a trajectory to the forces that bind it. For an isolated system of particles interacting through Newtonian gravitational potential energy, it gives : the average kinetic energy is half the magnitude of the average negative potential energy. An eccentric Kepler orbit makes the distinction vivid: kinetic energy and potential energy vary throughout the orbit, although their sum is constant. The relation concerns their time averages, rather than their values at every instant. It underlies the virial mass estimate and the negative heat capacity of a virialized gravitational system.
Use constant positive particle masses , positions , mechanical momenta , and total kinetic energy . The auxiliary quantity is a sum of dot products, not the gravitational constant, which we denote here by :
This finite- identity is exact wherever Newton's second law holds along a regular trajectory; must include every force. The endpoint term is what a finite observation window leaves behind. For the infinite-time theorem, suppose the averages on the left exist and . A sufficient condition is uniformly bounded positions and velocities for finitely many particles. More generally suffices, even without those individual bounds. Bounded positions alone do not supply a bound on momenta, especially near a singular potential energy; nor does a small endpoint term prove thermodynamic equilibrium. Periodic motion with gives the identity without an endpoint term at that finite . For an isolated system, use an inertial centre of mass frame so translational drift does not contribute bulk kinetic energy.[ref]
For a differentiable potential energy that is a homogeneous function of degree , choose its additive constant so that the scaling law really holds. With conservative forces, the Euler theorem for homogeneous functions gives
Thus a harmonic oscillator has and . An isolated system with Newtonian gravitational potential energy has
Each interacting pair occurs once, and at infinite separation. Here the total energy is conserved. An external field or a mixture of different scaling powers requires its own force term; one cannot assign the whole potential energy a single degree . The virial theorem for a homogeneous pair potential states the corresponding general energy relation.
Virial theorem on a Kepler ellipse Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-20
Consider the exact two-body problem with masses . In the inertial centre of mass frame, its internal kinetic energy is , where is their relative position, is the reduced mass, and with . Take a noncollision elliptic Kepler orbit with semi-major axis and orbital eccentricity . Write for eccentric anomaly, to avoid confusing it with total energy . With mean motion and orbital period , Kepler's equation and the orbit geometry give
The time origin is periapsis. Since , the time average of over one orbital period is exactly . Therefore and , independently of orbital eccentricity. Equal steps in eccentric anomaly are not equal time steps; unweighted averaging of a drawing of the ellipse gives the wrong answer.
Figure 1.
Instantaneous kinetic energy and potential energy, their orbital period averages, and the finite-window virial residual on an eccentric Kepler orbit
. Details.
The original dimensionless example in both diagrams has and . At periapsis, , , ; at apoapsis, , , . Both have , but is respectively and . Only the orbital period averages are and . The instantaneous zero of occurs at , not at every point of the orbit.
Figure 2.
Relative orbit of the same two-body problem, with equal-time markers, the attracting focus, and periapsis and apoapsis energies
. Details.
The endpoint term can also be evaluated exactly: . Starting at periapsis, a window ending at eccentric anomaly has
At , Kepler's equation gives and a positive residual . At or , returns to zero and the residual vanishes exactly. The lower panel shows the running residual and its endpoint expression coinciding; the shaded quarter-orbital period window explains why a short observation need not satisfy the infinite-time theorem.
Vis-viva equation Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-05
For a Kepler orbit with semi-major axis , the vis-viva equation is
For the convention that a hyperbolic Kepler orbit has positive semi-major-axis magnitude , its final term instead has a plus sign.