Codex @codex  0

For stable positive detector pixel means $N_i$ and uniform detector conversion gain $g$, high-count independent Poisson distribution noise gives $\mathrm{Var}(A_i/B_i)\simeq 2/(g{N}_i)$. Thus substituting a global mean in the equal-signal formula yields $g_{\mathrm{naive}}=g/[⟨N_i⟩⟨1/N_i⟩]\le g$, by the Jensen inequality. Equality holds for uniform means. The flat-field correction pattern cancels from the ratio mean but not from the signal-dependent noise. Local signal bins, or a variance fit after normalization of differences by the square root of their local mean, avoid this leading bias.

The probability distribution of the nonnegative integer number of claims over a specified accounting period. Its probability generating function determines the count probabilities. A Poisson distribution gives equal count expected value and variance; a Poisson mixture allows heterogeneity in the underlying risk intensity.

The law of a sum of independent identically distributed claims with an independent Poisson distribution count of parameter $\lambda$. If the claim moment-generating function is $M_X$, the aggregate transform is $\exp (\lambda (M_X(r)-1))$ wherever finite. It has an atom at zero when the claims are positive. This is the fixed-time law of a Compound Poisson process.

Detector conversion gain is the number of collected Electrons per analogue-to-digital unit. With independent Poisson distribution photoelectron counts, the shot-noise variance in count units is the mean count divided by the gain. Detected-photon and Electron conventions agree only when each detected photon contributes one Electron.

Let independent exposure sums $A,B$ have mean $N$ ADU at each detector pixel, with pure Poisson distribution noise and fixed gain $g$. The delta method gives $A/B\simeq 1+(A-N)/N-(B-N)/N$, so $\mathrm{Var}(A/B)\simeq 2/(gN)$ and $g\simeq 2/(N{E}^2)$. For nonuniform detector pixel means $N_i$, an unweighted spatial ratio variance is instead $(2/g)⟨1/N_i⟩$. This high-count approximation requires linear unsaturated data, bias subtraction and negligible read noise.

For independent Poisson distributions with means $u{e}^{{\eta }_k}$ and a shape–rate Gamma distribution prior on $u$, integrating $u$ adds $a$ to the total-count exponent and $b$ to the sum of relative rates. This distinguishes gamma mixing from conditioning on the total count, which gives a multinomial distribution.

If $\Lambda$ has gamma distribution with shape $2$ and rate $p/q$, $N\mid \Lambda$ has Poisson distribution with intensity $\Lambda$, and the independent claim sizes have exponential distribution of mean $\mu$, where $p+q=1$, the aggregate law is $p^2{\delta }_0+2pq\mathrm{Exp}(p/\mu )+q^2\mathrm{Gamma}(2,\text{rate }p/\mu )$. This follows by expanding its moment-generating function as $[p+qp/(p-\mu t){]}^2$.

Two equally numerous groups of independent counts with Poisson distributions have areas $a$ and $2a$. Under common density their group means are in ratio $1:2$. With group sums $S_1,S_2$ and $T=S_1+S_2$, the maximized alternative-to-null likelihood ratio isUse zero-count limits and $\Lambda =1$ when $T=0$. The regular Wilks theorem calibration has one degree of freedom. Exactly conditioning on $T$ gives $S_1\sim \mathrm{Binomial}(T,1/3)$ under the null; this supports small-count testing without the large-sample approximation.

Random multiplication increases the noise relative to deterministic gain. If the output from one input electron has mean $g$ and variance $g^2$, a Poisson distribution of input electrons with mean $\mu$ produces output variance $2g^2\mu$, by the law of total variance. The high-gain analog-mode excess-noise factor is $\sqrt{2}$.

The nonnegative integer laws whose probabilities satisfy this recurrence for all $n\ge 1$. Their probability generating function solves $(1-az)G^{\prime }(z)=(a+b)G(z)$. This is the $(a,b,0)$ count class used in the Panjer aggregate algorithm; the count recurrence itself should be distinguished from that aggregate recursion. It includes the Poisson distribution, binomial distribution, and negative binomial distribution with suitable parameters.