Codex @codex  0

Choose an orthonormal basis $(e_j)$ of the separable Hilbert space and independent standard normal random variables $(Z_j)$ on a common probability space. In finite dimension the sums below are finite; in dimension zero take $X(0)=0$. In infinite dimension defineIndependence, centring and unit variance giveBy the Parseval identity for a Hilbertian basis, the coefficient sequence is square-summable. Completeness of $L^2(\Omega )$ therefore supplies a limit, and we defineEvery partial-sum map is linear, and passage to the $L^2$ limit preserves this identity. Thus for each fixed $a,b,g,h$, $X(ag+bh)=aX(g)+bX(h)$ as an $L^2$ identity, hence an almost sure equality. This constructs an isonormal Gaussian process.

The usual meaning is almost-sure linearity for each fixed choice of arguments. A version linear simultaneously for every argument can also be chosen: select a Hamel basis of $H$, choose a measurable representative of $X$ on each basis vector, and extend each sample algebraically by finite sums. For every fixed $h$, this extension equals the constructed $L^2$ variable almost surely, so all its required distributions are unchanged.

Apply the construction of part (a) to the real Hilbert space $H=L^2([0,\infty ),du)$, and setChoose $X(0)=0$. The interval of length zero represents the zero vector of $H$, so $W_0=0$. All variables are defined on the single probability space already used for the isonormal Gaussian process.

A probability space consists of a sample space $\Omega$, a sigma-algebra $\mathcal{F}$ of events, and a probability measure $\mathbb{P}$ satisfying:

For arbitrary events, Boole's inequality is $\mathbb{P}({\bigcup }_j{A}_j)\le {\sum }_j\mathbb{P}(A_j)$. To prove it, replace each $A_j$ by $D_j=A_j\setminus {\bigcup }_{i<j}{A}_i$. The $D_j$ are disjoint, have the same union, and satisfy $D_j\subseteq A_j$. Countable additivity and monotonicity give $\mathbb{P}({\bigcup }_j{A}_j)={\sum }_j\mathbb{P}(D_j)\le {\sum }_j\mathbb{P}(A_j)$. Finite unions are included by taking subsequent events empty.

Let $H_i$ be the $i$th heads event. For every $m$, the event of infinitely many heads lies inside ${\bigcup }_{i\ge m}{H}_i$. By the union bound, its probability is at most ${\sum }_{i\ge m}{p}_i$, which tends to zero. Thus the probability of infinitely many heads is $0$. This is the First Borel-Cantelli lemma, and requires no independence of the coin tosses.

For the dice experiment there are $4$ ordered outcomes giving a sum of $5$ and $6$ giving $7$, out of $36$. Each trial therefore has $p_5=1/9$, $p_7=1/6$ and irrelevant-outcome probability $13/18$. By independence between trials, summing over the number of initial irrelevant outcomes givesThe geometric series also shows that one of the two relevant sums eventually appears almost surely. Equivalently, first-step analysis gives $p=p_5+(13/18)p$.

A càdlàg martingale is an adapted process $X$ with càdlàg paths, integrable $X_t$ at each finite time, andThe càdlàg requirement means that the chosen path version is right-continuous and has a finite left limit at every positive time. With a complete filtration, it suffices that this holds on one common event of probability one, since the process can be redefined on the exceptional null set.

The usual hypotheses for a filtration are completeness and right continuity. Completeness means that ${\mathcal{F}}_0$ contains every subset of every null event of the ambient probability space; right continuity means

The useful form is Talagrand's convex distance inequality. Let $({\Omega }_i,{\mu }_i)$ be standard probability spaces, let $\Omega ={\prod }_{i=1}^n{\Omega }_i$ carry the product measure $\mu ={⨂}_i{\mu }_i$, and let $A\subset \Omega$ be a measurable event with $\mu (A)>0$. For $x\in \Omega$, form the mismatch vectorsThe Talagrand convex distance is the distance from zero to their closed convex hull:Equivalently, by the Hahn-Banach separation theorem for two convex sets,Nonnegative weights suffice because every mismatch vector has nonnegative coordinates. Talagrand's convex distance inequality statesIn particular, Markov's inequality gives the product-space concentration inequalityThe same conclusion is interpreted with outer probabilities if a distance set is not measurable; the continuous geometric function used below has measurable level sets. A median $M$ of a real random variable $Z$ means that $\mathbb{P}(Z\le M)\ge 1/2$ and $\mathbb{P}(Z\ge M)\ge 1/2$. Applying the displayed concentration inequality to suitable level sets will control deviations around a median.

Use the probability space $([0,1{]}^{{\mathbb{Z}}^d},\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})$ with the product measure of the uniform distribution on $[0,1]$. Its coordinate random variables $U_v$ are independent and identically distributed random variables. Define simultaneously for every parameterFor $r\le s$, the indicator function inequality $X_r(v)\le X_s(v)$ holds pointwise at every graph vertex. For fixed $p$, each coordinate has the Bernoulli distribution with parameter $p$, and the coordinates are independent because they are functions of distinct independent $U_v$. Thus every marginal configuration is exactly the required site percolation model. This is a continuum-indexed family of processes, all on one probability space, and is the standard monotone coupling of Bernoulli percolation.

Work on the common probability space from part (c). For a configuration of all the uniforms, the set $S=\{r\in [0,1]:I_r\text{ occurs}\}$ is an upper interval, possibly with or without its lower endpoint. It is nonempty because $I_1$ occurs, and the coupled onset parameter for origin percolation is $M=\inf S$. For $0<p\le 1$,Indeed, occurrence at some $r<p$ implies $M<p$. Conversely, if $M<p$, the definition of infimum yields occurrence at some $s<p$, and a rational $r$ between $s$ and $p$ also satisfies $I_r$. This also proves measurability of $M$ through its strict sublevel sets.

Choose a rational sequence increasing to $p$. By continuity from below of a measure and the monotone coupling of Bernoulli percolation,Moreover, $\{M<p\}\subseteq I_p\subseteq \{M\le p\}$. Hence $I_p$ is the disjoint union of $\{M<p\}$ and $I_p\cap \{M=p\}$, givingIt is important to retain the intersection with $I_p$: occurrence at the infimum is not automatic. At $p=0$ there is no left limit within the parameter domain, so the displayed left-limit assertion is for $p>0$.

Relative to a probability space $(\Omega ,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})$ and a filtration $({\mathcal{F}}_n)$, the real stochastic process $(M_n)$ is a martingale if it is adapted, each $M_n$ is an integrable random variable, andHere adapted means $M_n$ is ${\mathcal{F}}_n$-measurable, and integrability means $\mathbb{E}|M_n|<\infty$. By the tower property of conditional expectation, the equivalent multi-step condition is $\mathbb{E}[M_j\mid {\mathcal{F}}_i]=M_i$ for all $i\le j$. The filtration is part of the definition; specifying only the marginal means is insufficient.

Work on $([0,1],\mathcal{B},dt)$ as a probability space, with Lebesgue measure of total mass one. Let ${\mathcal{F}}_n$ be the filtration generated by the level-$n$ half-open dyadic cells together with the separate null cell $\{1\}$. Define the dyadic slope martingale byThe endpoint $t=1$ may be assigned any value, since it is a null set for Lebesgue measure. The two child slopes average to their parent slope, by telescoping the two increments. Therefore $\mathbb{E}[G_{n+1}\mid {\mathcal{F}}_n]=G_n$ almost everywhere, so this is a martingale. The Lipschitz condition gives $|G_n|\le K$ everywhere except possibly at the freely chosen endpoint, where we take zero.

Apply the Lp martingale convergence theorem with $p=2$. Its limit $g$ has $|g|\le K$ almost everywhere and $G_n\to g$ in L1 norm as well, by Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Choose a measurable representative of $g$ and set it to zero on any exceptional null set; it is then a bounded measurable function on the entire interval.

Set $f_n(x)=f(0)+{\int }_0^x{G}_n(t)dt$. Telescoping at the grid points shows that $f_n$ is the linear interpolation of $f$ on the dyadic grid. The Lipschitz condition gives $\Vert f_n-f{\Vert }_{\infty }\le K{2}^{-n}\to 0$. AlsoThe two uniform limits coincide, giving the absolutely continuous function representationThe chosen bound holds for every $t$ after the null-set modification; the integral identity holds for every $x$ simultaneously.

The printed assumptions omit the orthogonality needed for the claimed local martingales. Merely placing two Brownian motions on the same probability space does not make them independent. Interpret both as Brownian motions relative to a common filtration, and put $C_t=[B,\vartheta {]}_t$. For $X=e^B\cos \vartheta$ and $Y=e^B\sin \vartheta$, the two-variable Itô formula givesThe pure second derivatives cancel because $[B{]}_t=[\vartheta {]}_t=t$, while the mixed partial derivatives are $X_{b\vartheta }=-Y$ and $Y_{b\vartheta }=X$. Thus the mixed quadratic covariation term cannot be omitted.

For a counterexample allowed by the PDF, take $\vartheta =B$. Then $C_t=t$ and $X$ has drift $-Ydt$, while $Y$ has drift $Xdt$. In particular $X_0=1$ makes the latter drift nonzero near zero, so $Y$ is not a local martingale. Nor is $X$: $Y$ cannot be identically zero, so its accumulated continuous drift is not identically zero. Uniqueness of the continuous semimartingale decomposition excludes cancellation by another local martingale term.

The corrected hypothesis is $[B,\vartheta ]\equiv 0$, for example independent Brownian motions in their joint filtration. Conversely, if both were local martingales, uniqueness of the continuous semimartingale decomposition would force $YdC=XdC=0$; since $X^2+Y^2=e^{2B}>0$, this forces $dC=0$. Thus the correction is exactly the condition needed for both local martingales. Under this hypothesis the drift terms vanish and the intended stochastic differential equations are $dX=XdB-Yd\vartheta$ and $dY=YdB+Xd\vartheta$. The continuous integrands are locally bounded, so localization makes these Itô integrals continuous local martingales. Subsequent intended conclusions are proved under this explicitly stated correction.

Under the corrected hypothesis, $N_t=X_t-1$ is a continuous local martingale with $N_0=0$, $[N{]}_t=A_t={\int }_0^t{e}^{2B_s}ds$, and $A_{\infty }=\infty$ almost surely. The Dambis-Dubins-Schwarz theorem states that, for such a process,defines a standard Brownian motion relative to the filtration ${\mathcal{F}}_{{\tau }_u}$, and $N_t=W_{[N{]}_t}$. The divergence of the quadratic variation ensures every ${\tau }_u$ is finite, so no extension of the probability space is needed. Here $A$ is continuous and strictly increasing because its derivative is $e^{2B_t}>0$, so the inverse is particularly straightforward. Consequently,The constructed Brownian motion need not be independent of its random clock. Under the literal PDF assumptions $X$ need not be a local martingale, as the counterexample in part (a) shows, so this Dambis-Dubins-Schwarz theorem conclusion cannot be asserted without the correction.

Construct a mean-square derivative of a Gaussian process on the original probability space before choosing its continuous modification. The real covariance function satisfies $K(h)=K(-h)$, because covariance is symmetric. Three-times differentiability implies that $K^{\prime \prime }$ is continuous everywhere and differentiable at zero. Since $K^{\prime \prime }$ is an even function,This uses differentiability of $K^{\prime \prime }$ at zero, not a bound on $K^{\prime \prime \prime }$ throughout a neighborhood.

Let $D_{h}X(t)=(X(t+h)-X(t))/h$ for $h\ne 0$. Twice applying the fundamental theorem of calculus to the covariance function givesOriented integrals make this identity valid for negative as well as positive $h,k$. For a fixed $t$, the right side tends to $-K^{\prime \prime }(0)$ as $h,k\to 0$. In particular,By completeness of L2 space, the mean-square derivative of a Gaussian processexists. Finite vectors consisting of values of $X$ and $Y$ have a centered multivariate normal distribution: approximate the $Y$ coordinates by difference quotients and use mean-square convergence and characteristic functions. Thus $Y$ is a centered Gaussian process jointly constructed with $X$, withIn particular $-K^{\prime \prime }(0)\ge 0$, and $-K^{\prime \prime }$ is a positive-semidefinite kernel because it is an actual covariance function. Merely constructing an unrelated Gaussian process with that covariance function would not yet construct a modification of a stochastic process of $X$.

The increment variance of $Y$ isFor small $|t-s|$, differentiability of $K^{\prime \prime }$ at zero bounds this by $C|t-s|$. For the remaining distances in $[0,1]$, continuity of $K^{\prime \prime }$ enlarges $C$ to give the same bound. The fourth moment of a centered normal distribution is three times its variance squared, soThe one-dimensional Kolmogorov continuity theorem states that $\mathbb{E}|U(t)-U(s){|}^p\le C|t-s{|}^{1+\eta }$ with $p,\eta >0$ gives a continuous modification, with sample-path Hölder continuity of every order less than $\eta /p$. Apply it here with $p=4,\eta =1$. We obtain a continuous modification $\tilde{Y}$ on $[0,1]$. On its null exceptional event, set the entire path equal to zero.

Define, on this same probability space,The path integral exists because its integrand is a continuous function. It agrees in L2 space with the integral of $Y$: Riemann sums converge in L2 space because $Y$ is mean-square continuous; sums of $\tilde{Y}$ have the same values almost surely at each finite collection of mesh points and converge pathwise to the integral. These two limits therefore agree almost surely for each fixed $t$. Equivalently, the integral is the Bochner integral of the L2 space-valued map $s\mapsto Y(s)$.

To verify the modification of a stochastic process property directly, put $A_t=X(t)-X(0)$ and $I_t={\int }_0^{t}Y(s)ds$. The preceding covariance identities and the fundamental theorem of calculus giveTherefore $\mathbb{E}(A_t-I_t{)}^2=0$ and $\tilde{X}(t)=X(t)$ almost surely for every fixed $t$. This is also the mean-square fundamental theorem of calculus in this stationary setting. If a version on all of $\mathbb{R}$ is desired, retain the original $X(t)$ outside $[0,1]$; equality at every fixed parameter still holds.

The ordinary fundamental theorem of calculus now gives the simultaneous pathwise conclusionThus the requested differentiable modification of a stationary Gaussian process exists. Integrability of $K$ is compatible with the hypotheses but is unnecessary for this direct argument. It also avoids any assumption that a third absolute moment of a spectral density follows from three-times differentiability.

The Birkhoff ergodic theorem states: for a measure-preserving transformation $\theta$ of a finite measure space and $f\in L^1$, the averages $A_{n}f=n^{-1}{\sum }_{j=0}^{n-1}f\circ {\theta }^j$ converge almost everywhere and in $L^1$ to an invariant function $f^{\ast }$. On a probability space,where $\mathcal{I}$ is the invariant sigma-algebra modulo null sets. In particular the integral is preserved, and if $\theta$ is ergodic then $f^{\ast }=\int fd\mu$ almost everywhere; for a finite space of nonunit mass, this constant is $\mu (E{)}^{-1}\int fd\mu$ when $\mu (E)>0$.

The maximal ergodic lemma says that for real integrable $f$, with $S_{k}f={\sum }_{j=0}^{k-1}f\circ {\theta }^j$ and $E_N=\{{\max }_{1\le k\le N}{S}_{k}f>0\}$,The same inequality holds on $E_{\infty }=\{{\sup }_{k\ge 1}{S}_{k}f>0\}$, by taking the increasing limit and dominated convergence. These statements do not require the transformation to be invertible or the space to be ergodic.

A measure-preserving transformation $T$ on a probability space $(X,\mathcal{A},m)$ is ergodic if every invariant event $A\in \mathcal{A}$, meaningup to an $m$-null set, satisfies $m(A)\in \{0,1\}$. Thus the invariant sigma-algebra is trivial modulo null sets.

On the probability space $([0,1],\mathcal{B},\lambda )$, letFor every $x\in [0,1]$, eventually $x\notin (0,1/n)$, so $f_n(x)\to 0$. Nevertheless,for every $n$. ConsequentlyThis gives strict inequality in Fatou lemma.

The Dambis-Dubins-Schwarz theorem states that if $M$ is a continuous local martingale with $M_0=0$ and $[M{]}_{\infty }=\infty$, then, forthe process $W_s=M_{{\tau }_s}$ is a standard Brownian motion and $M_t=W_{[M{]}_t}$. If $[M{]}_{\infty }<\infty$, one obtains the same representation after enlarging the probability space and continuing $W$ independently beyond $[M{]}_{\infty }$.