Beta-lactoglobulin 2026-10-18
A whey protein used as a model solute in studies of protein association and transport. Its effective electric charge, association state and hydrodynamic radius depend on solution conditions. In a specified spherical-particle model, its electrophoretic mobility and sedimentation speed depend on its charge and buoyant mass through the same Stokes drag law.
Diffusion and mobility. For a dilute isolated sphere in a Newtonian fluid, Stokes's law gives the drag magnitude , where is the dynamic viscosity and is the hydrodynamic radius. The mechanical mobility is therefore ; the translational hydrodynamic mobility matrix is .
To relate mobility to diffusion, put the particles in a weak external potential energy . Their drift speed is . For number density , the sum of drift and Fick's first law fluxes is
At thermal equilibrium, the Boltzmann distribution gives , and the net flux is zero. Substituting into yields . Thus the Stokes–Einstein relation is
Here is the Boltzmann constant and is absolute temperature. The assumptions include a no-slip approximately spherical particle, a continuum fluid, a small particle Reynolds number, and negligible hydrodynamic interactions with other particles or boundaries.
Gravitational sedimentation. The buoyant force must be included, since the mass of displaced water is comparable to the protein mass. Using gives
so the buoyant mass in the stated spherical model is
The drag coefficient is . At terminal speed, , so
Ignoring buoyancy would give and would not use the supplied water density. This calculation treats the stated radius as both the hydrodynamic radius and the radius determining displaced volume; a real hydrated protein can require a separately measured partial specific volume.
Electrical drift. In the specified simple electrophoresis model, terminal force balance is . Therefore
where is the electrophoretic mobility and the elementary electric charge. For the given positive beta-lactoglobulin charge,
in the direction of the electric field. This exceeds the gravitational sedimentation speed by about .
Separation time. The two populations have equal drag coefficients because their radii are equal. Their difference in drift speed is therefore set by one elementary charge:
Starting with coincident band centres, their separation is . Hence
At that time the original band has travelled and the mutant . Their masses do not enter this ideal electrical force balance: equal-radius particles with different masses but the same charge would have equal electrophoretic mobility in this model.
Practical discrimination. A one-charge difference is enough for the stipulated separation, so the method is sensitive to mutations that change effective charge or friction. It cannot distinguish every mutation: substitutions that preserve charge and hydrodynamic size need not separate. Buffer pH changes protein ionization, and realistic electrophoresis also involves the ionic atmosphere, electro-osmosis, walls or gel interactions, and finite band widths.
For example, the Stokes–Einstein relation at gives . For an initially narrow band, diffusive broadening of electrophoretic bands gives
at the calculated separation time. Thus the centres are about diffusion standard deviations apart, rather than forming infinitely sharp bands. The stated centre-separation criterion is achievable in the model, but actual resolution also depends on the loading width and other dispersion mechanisms.
Figure 1.
Predicted band centres and diffusion widths after 508 seconds
. Original Gaussian drift-diffusion calculation for initially narrow bands, using the stipulated equal-radius model. Details.
Equivalent centrifugal acceleration. For the original protein to attain its electrical drift speed by sedimentation, its buoyant centrifugal force must equal :
Consequently
This is the acceleration at the protein's position in the rotating solution; no rotation rate can be assigned without a centrifuge radius. If the intended comparison is instead the relative separation speed of the two bands, use , since their displaced volumes are equal. Matching then gives . In that separation experiment the heavier original protein moves faster centrifugally, whereas the more highly charged mutant moves faster electrically.
A colloidal grain in a liquid is large enough to see with a microscope, yet small enough for thermal motion to compete with its tendency to settle. In the Perrin sedimentation experiment, the equilibrium number density falls with height: a visible miniature atmosphere. Counting grains at different heights measures an energy scale; tracking their Brownian motion measures a transport rate. Connecting both to the same Avogadro constant makes the experiment a quantitative test of kinetic theory. The Wiener measure describes an idealized path law; these measurements instead test a physical model and its material parameters.
Jean Baptiste Perrin's 1909 memoir traces his sedimentation experiments to May 1908. It reports relative counts , , , at heights , , , , and compares radius estimates from Stokes settling velocity, counted grain mass, and rows of touching grains.[ref]
The 1926 lecture describes resin precipitated from alcohol into water, washed and fractionated by centrifugation to obtain nearly monodisperse gamboge or mastic grains. Diameter and density were measured separately. A sealed slide-and-cover-glass chamber prevented evaporation; a vertical microscope resolved roughly layers through a roughly depth. Refocusing and photographing compared layer populations after equilibrium; changing temperature reversibly changed the distribution.[ref]
In Les Atomes (1913), Jean Baptiste Perrin restricts the eyepiece view to fewer than five or six grains and alternates observations between heights. Focus displacement requires a refractive index correction to recover actual layer separation. Horizontal positions were marked with a camera lucida, usually every , and distances calibrated with a micrometer; the polygon joins sampled positions rather than recording the intervening trajectory.[ref][ref]