Inside the infinite square well, the Schrödinger equation and Dirichlet boundary conditions are
The wavefunction vanishes outside the box. These walls constrain its values, not its first derivatives: requiring both to vanish at an endpoint would eliminate all the nonzero stationary solutions.
For a nonzero separated solution, separation of variables gives
The last equation is the time-independent Schrödinger equation. Its energy eigenvalue is real. Multiplication by and integration by parts, with the endpoint values zero, gives
Equality would force to be constant and hence zero, so a nonzero energy eigenstate has . Writing , the general solution is . The left wall gives ; the right gives . Negative integers reproduce the same functions up to a constant, and gives the zero function, leaving for .
Finally . Thus wavefunction normalization with positive coefficient gives
An arbitrary constant global phase has no effect on the quantum state.
For a free particle, the Hamiltonian operator is , where is the momentum operator. The time-independent Schrödinger equation is therefore
The full stationary state is . The periodic boundary condition identifies and , giving a particle on a circle with wavefunction normalization over one period.
Inside the infinite square well, , and the time-independent Schrödinger equation is
For , write and . The first Dirichlet boundary condition gives , and the second requires for a nonzero state. The case is identically zero; negative only changes an overall quantum phase. For a linear solution satisfying both walls is zero, and for the hyperbolic solutions likewise cannot satisfy both walls nontrivially.
Wavefunction normalization, , fixes . The orthonormal energy eigenstates and energy eigenvalues are therefore
Each state vanishes outside the well. Its stationary time-dependent form is . General states are normalized superpositions of these modes, rather than additional single energy eigenstates.
The one-dimensional time-independent Schrödinger equation is
The differential term is the kinetic energy operator acting on the wave function, supplies the multiplicative potential energy, and their sum is the Hamiltonian operator. The eigenvalue is the stationary state's total energy. This form assumes a nonrelativistic particle, a time-independent scalar potential, and no additional internal degrees of freedom in the stated model.
The one-dimensional Time-dependent Schrödinger equation is
The left side generates time evolution; the two terms on the right are the kinetic and potential parts of the Hamiltonian operator. For a time-independent potential and an energy eigenstate, set . Cancelling the time factor gives the time-independent Schrödinger equation, .
By the Born rule, is the position probability in an interval of width , with for a normalized particle. Therefore in one dimension. An ideal scattering plane wave instead uses flux normalization and is not itself a normalizable single-particle state on the whole line.
Schrödinger equation Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-20
The Schrödinger equation governs the evolution of a quantum state between instances of measurement in quantum mechanics. For a particle of mass moving in a prescribed real potential energy , its position wavefunction satisfies
Here is the Planck constant, is the Laplace operator, and the Hamiltonian operator combines kinetic energy with potential energy. Specify an initial wavefunction, an operator domain and any boundary conditions: the differential expression alone does not completely specify a physical model. The Born rule then turns the evolving probability amplitude into position probabilities through and integration over a region.
This scalar Schrödinger operator describes nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, with relevant momenta much smaller than , where is the speed of light. It omits the constant rest energy , assumes fixed particle number, and suppresses active spin dynamics and coupling to a magnetic vector potential. A free electron with a fixed, uncoupled spin state can still use this scalar model; the Pauli equation supplies the additional spin components and magnetic coupling when needed. A prescribed real describes a closed evolution model or an approximation in which the source of that potential energy is treated as external. Dissipation, particle creation and a general measurement in quantum mechanics need further modelling.
For a time-independent self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator, the spectral theorem defines unitary time evolution by
Initial states in the operator domain satisfy the differential equation in the Hilbert space sense; the unitary operator also evolves all other states in that Hilbert space. Time-dependent Hamiltonian operators need suitable regularity and domain hypotheses; their evolution is not generally the exponential of .
The local reason for conservation is especially tangible. Multiply the Schrödinger equation by the complex conjugate , subtract its conjugate multiplied by , and use the fact that the real potential energy terms cancel. For smooth wavefunctions this gives the probability continuity equation
The divergence theorem identifies the change in probability inside a region with minus the outward probability current. Decay at infinity, or appropriate probability-conserving boundary conditions, preserves wavefunction normalization. Conservation of total probability does not require a stationary probability density.
Its usefulness comes from being a linear partial differential equation: quantum superpositions of solutions are solutions, while different quantum phases can produce interference. For a fixed Hamiltonian operator, the time-independent Schrödinger equation finds the energy eigenstates; each then acquires just its own time-dependent quantum phase. One eigenvalue problem therefore organizes both allowed energies and the evolution of arbitrary quantum superpositions, with a continuous spectrum included when required. This is the attractive bridge between a spatial wave problem and a clock: energy differences determine the rate at which relative quantum phases change. It makes atomic spectral lines, quantum tunnelling and quantum scattering calculable from a specified model.
For an explicit example without confinement, take a free particle on the whole line, , initially in a Gaussian wave packet with position standard deviation and mean momentum :
Unlike a single plane wave, this wavefunction satisfies wavefunction normalization. A Fourier transform writes it as a quantum superposition of plane waves. Their dispersion relation is , so each Fourier component gains the factor . Completing the square in the resulting Gaussian integral gives
with the square root chosen continuously from . Its position probability density and standard deviation are
The centre moves with the group velocity and the wave packet spreads because different wavenumbers have different group velocities. This is unitary wave dispersion, without a random force or loss of probability. Independently, the initial momentum standard deviation is and the initial position-momentum covariance vanishes. Free evolution gives in the Heisenberg picture, hence
This independently checks the spreading law. The Gaussian integral of is one at every time; the decreasing peak is exactly offset by increasing width.
As hypothetical preparation parameters, choose a free electron with and . Using and gives
The rounded electron mass uses the 2022 adjustment.[ref] At , the centre is and ; at , they are and . The mean kinetic energy stays
It includes both mean motion and the momentum spread. The mean speed is about and the momentum spread corresponds to , making the nonrelativistic model accurate for the appreciably occupied part of this ideal Gaussian distribution. Its mathematically unbounded tails are an idealization.
Figure 1. . Calculated electron position probability densities for the hypothetical preparation above, together with the position standard deviation. The area under every curve is one. The dashed width curve illustrates pure translation without spreading for comparison; it is not the free solution. No curve represents measured data. Source. Details.
The complex width also explains where the probability goes. Write , where is the dimensionless quantum phase. Differentiating the exact solution gives
Relative to the moving centre, the probability current points outward on both sides for . This is a flux statement, not an additional assumption about individual particle trajectories. At and , the relative flow speeds are , about . The probability within a moving interval of half-width falls from about initially to at , exactly because of this outward probability current.
Figure 2.
Curved quantum phase drives spreading probability current
. The same free Gaussian wave packet at . With , removing the carrier and a spatially constant quantum phase leaves . The right panel plots : negative to the left, positive to the right. Flux through the marked moving interval endpoints explains its decreasing probability. Source. Details.
Historically, the 1926 Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Erste Mitteilung) by Erwin Schrödinger began with the stationary hydrogen atom problem. It distinguishes discrete negative energies from a positive continuous spectrum; it is not yet the general evolution equation displayed above.[ref] The opening of quantum mechanics discusses its original vibrating-string analogy.
In the 12 December 1933 lecture The fundamental idea of wave mechanics by Erwin Schrödinger, Erwin Schrödinger explains the move from independent rays to waves through diffraction, then applies that analogy to atomic physics. His closing pages explicitly acknowledge the difficulty of reconciling wave language with observed particle tracks. This retrospective physical argument motivates the model; it does not derive the modern Born rule from classical mechanics.[ref]
The dates separate proposal from measurement: the de Broglie wavelength belongs to the 1924 thesis, the Schrödinger equation to 1926, and the Davisson–Germer experiment's electron diffraction beams to 1927.[ref] That linked experiment describes the prepared nickel crystal, evacuated electron gun, angular collector scans, retarding-potential selection and heating controls. Its measured collector electric current tests wave-dependent scattering probabilities; it neither measures a wavefunction directly nor establishes this equation uniquely.
Schrödinger operator Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-20
A self-adjoint operator of this form with supplies the Quantum Hamiltonian of a particle in the potential .
Stark effect of the hydrogen ground state Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-20
The even, spherically symmetric hydrogen atom ground state has no permanent electric dipole, so a uniform electric field gives no first-order energy shift. The electric-dipole selection rules for hydrogen allow odd-parity excited states to mix in at second order, yielding a negative shift quadratic in the field.
Here there is a nondegenerate energy eigenvalue, so second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory applies. With , it gives
The notation includes integration over the continuous spectrum, as well as a sum over discrete energy eigenstates. All denominators are negative because is the ground state. The positive electric polarizability therefore lowers its energy.[ref]
An independent way to see the coefficient avoids truncating that sum. Define and . In coordinates , the dimensionless unperturbed Hamiltonian operator and normalized wavefunction are and , with energy eigenvalue . Writing the first-order wavefunction correction as , substitution into the time-independent Schrödinger equation gives
The second equality can be checked by differentiation. Its parity makes orthogonal to . The resulting integral is
since the normalized radial probability density is , giving and . Converting back to SI units gives the stated electric polarizability. The induced electric dipole moment is and tends to zero with the electric field, unlike the selected degenerate branches' leading dipoles. Both calculations describe weak-field level shifts; a spatially uniform static electric field also allows eventual quantum tunnelling and ionization, which these real energy corrections do not calculate.
Wavefunction matching at a finite potential step Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For a finite jump in a one-dimensional potential energy, with constant mass and no delta potential, both the wavefunction and its first spatial derivative are continuous. Integrating the time-independent Schrödinger equation across a vanishing interval makes the jump in vanish, since the integral of vanishes. A jump in itself would produce a derivative of a Dirac delta function in , with no matching term in the equation. The second derivative can jump. This matching allows transmission and quantum tunnelling; a finite step is not a hard wall.