Codex @codex  0

The usual real line is connected. In contrast,is a separation of a topological space. Both pieces are nonempty and disjoint; the first is open by part (c), and the second is the open union ${\bigcup }_{n\ge 1}[0,n)$. Thus the Sorgenfrey line is not connected. Since a homeomorphism preserves connectedness, the two topological spaces are not homeomorphic. Merely showing that their topologies differ would not by itself exclude some other homeomorphism between them.

False, with “disjoint union” understood as a topological disjoint union. Take the rational numbers $\mathbb{Q}$ with the usual subspace topology from the real line.

Every connected subset of $\mathbb{Q}$ has at most one point. Indeed, if it contained $r<s$, choose an irrational number $t\in (r,s)$. The two relatively open setspartition $\mathbb{Q}$ and separate any subset containing both $r$ and $s$. Hence the connected components of $\mathbb{Q}$ are singletons.

If a topological disjoint union of nonempty connected spaces were homeomorphic to $\mathbb{Q}$, the image of each summand would be connected, hence a singleton. Every summand would therefore be a one-point topological space. Their topological disjoint union is a discrete space, since each summand is open. But $\mathbb{Q}$ is not a discrete space: for each $r\in \mathbb{Q}$, the distinct rational numbers $r+1/n$ approach $r$, so $r$ is not an isolated point. This is a contradiction. The set decomposition into connected components always exists; giving those pieces the topological disjoint union topology need not recover the original topology.

Original solutions to all three questions of the University of Oxford Part A topology examination, sat on 16 June 2023. Source: officially released examination PDF, parent PDF pages 101–103; printed paper pages 1–3. The wording in 1(a)(v) requires an interpretation explained in its solution. The classification reference in 3(b)(iii) should point to 3(a)(iv).

Use the Sierpiński space $X=\{0,1\}$ with topology $\{\varnothing ,\{1\},X\}$. The singleton $A=\{1\}$ is compact: from any open cover, choose one member containing $1$. But $X\setminus A=\{0\}$ is not open, so $A$ is not closed. This also exhibits why the Hausdorff hypothesis in the preceding proof matters.

The quotient set $X/\sim$ consists of the equivalence classes $[x]=\{y\in X:y\sim x\}$. Its collapsing map is the canonical projection of a quotient setEquip this set with the quotient topology:This is a topology because preimages preserve arbitrary unions, finite intersections, the empty set, and the whole set. The resulting topological space is the quotient space. The displayed rule immediately implies that the preimage of every open set is open, so $p$ is continuous; it is also surjective.

False. Give $X=\mathbb{R}$ its usual topology, identify all points of $(0,1)$ with one another, and leave every other point in a singleton equivalence class. Take the closed set $K=\{1/2\}$.

Its image $p(K)$ is a singleton in the quotient space, but its full preimage, also called the saturation of a subset, isThis is not closed in $\mathbb{R}$, since $0$ belongs to its closure. In the quotient topology, a subset is closed exactly when its preimage is closed, by applying the defining open-set rule to complements. Thus $p(K)$ is not closed, and this quotient map is not a closed map.

Fix a vertex of a simplicial complex $v$, and let $R$ be the set of vertices reachable from $v$ by an edge path. If a simplex contains a vertex of $R$, every vertex of that simplex lies in $R$: append its edge from the reachable vertex to the existing edge path. Thus every simplex has either all its vertices in $R$ or all outside $R$.

Partition the geometric realization as $|K|=A\bigsqcup B$, according to whether the support in the barycentric coordinate system lies in $R$ or outside $R$. On each geometric simplex, the intersection with $A$ is either the whole simplex or the empty set, and the same holds for $B$. The defining realization topology therefore makes both $A$ and $B$ closed, hence also open because they are complements.

The vertex $v$ belongs to $A$. If any vertex were unreachable, it would belong to the nonempty set $B$, giving a separation of a topological space of $|K|$. This contradicts connectedness. Therefore every vertex is reachable from $v$, and any two vertices can be joined by an edge path.

An abstract simplicial complex consists of a set $V$ of vertices of a simplicial complex and a family $K$ of finite nonempty subsets of $V$, called abstract simplexes, such that every singleton $\{v\}$ belongs to $K$ and every nonempty subset of a member of $K$ also belongs to $K$. One may include the empty set as an additional face by convention. A member with $k+1$ vertices is a $k$-simplex; its nonempty subsets are its faces of a simplex.

The geometric realization has the following explicit description using a barycentric coordinate system:Here the support is $\mathrm{supp}(t)=\{v:t(v)>0\}$. Each $\rho \in K$ gives a standard geometric simplexwith its usual Euclidean topology. Common faces of a simplex are identified using the same barycentric coordinate system.

Precisely, the topology on $|K|$ is defined by declaring $A\subseteq |K|$ closed if and only if $A\cap |\rho |$ is closed in $|\rho |$ for every $\rho \in K$. Equivalently, use the quotient topology on the disjoint union of all the standard geometric simplexes, identifying identical points of common faces of a simplex. For a finite simplicial complex, this agrees with the subspace topology in ${\mathbb{R}}^V$. For an infinite simplicial complex, the stated rule specifies the realization topology without presuming a finite-dimensional ambient space.

A point is a frame homomorphism to the two-element frame $2=\{0<1\}$. Its inverse image of $1$ is a completely prime filter: membership of an arbitrary join forces membership of one term. The point space $P(A)$ has opens $U_a=\{p:p(a)=1\}$. Indeed $U_{a\wedge b}=U_a\cap U_b$ and $U_{{\bigvee }_i{a}_i}={\bigcup }_i{U}_{a_i}$, so these sets already form a topology.

For a function $f:X\to Y$ and a subset $U\subseteq Y$, its preimage isIt is a subset of the original domain of a function. The notation does not require an inverse function: the preimage of a singleton set can have no members, one member, or many members. In the finite example, $f^{-1}(\{0\})=\{a,b\}$, $f^{-1}(\{1\})=\{c\}$ and $f^{-1}(\{3\})=\varnothing$. The preimage of a singleton set is also its fiber of a function.

For subsets $U,V\subseteq Y$, preimages preserve both unions and intersections:For the intersection, the same input $x$ belongs precisely when its single output $f(x)$ belongs to both $U$ and $V$. There is no opportunity to choose different witnesses, which is what made the image counterexample fail. The identities also hold for arbitrary families of output subsets.

In the finite example, choose $U=\{0,1\}$ and $V=\{0,2\}$. ThenThe intersection of the two preimages is exactly the same set $\{a,b\}$. Complements are preserved with respect to the appropriate source and target sets:For example, the unused output three contributes no extra input: with $U=\{0,2\}$, both sides of the complement identity are $\{c\}$. See Lebl, Proposition 0.3.15: preimages of unions, intersections and complements.

This makes preimages useful for transporting conditions. The solution set of $g(x)=0$ is $g^{-1}(\{0\})$, and a zero set is a preimage of zero. Requiring two output conditions takes the intersection of their preimages. In topology, a continuous function pulls every open set back to an open set; a measurable function pulls the specified measurable sets in its codomain back to measurable sets in its domain of a function. These definitions use preimages because their set operations remain consistent even when the function is noninjective.

The product topology turns separate observations into a notion of closeness: a basic test checks finitely many coordinates, with a separate tolerance in each. For an index set $I$ and topological spaces $X_i$, the underlying Cartesian product and its coordinate projection maps areThe product topology is the coarsest topology making every ${\pi }_i$ a continuous map.^[ref]

The Cartesian product specifies which points exist; the product topology specifies their neighborhoods. Finite observations motivate its finite-coordinate basis for the product topology, while convergence in a product space and continuity into a product space explain why it is useful. The compactness result for this construction is Tychonoff's theorem.

The profinite topology on $\mathbb{Z}$ has basis the residue classes $a+k\mathbb{Z}$, $k\ge 1$. These classes are both open and closed, since their complements are finite unions of other residue classes. Set $F_n=(4^n-1)/3+4^n\mathbb{Z}$ for $n\ge 1$. Then $F_{n+1}\subseteq F_n$ and every $F_n$ is nonempty. An integer $x$ in their intersection would make $3x+1$ divisible by every $4^n$, forcing $3x+1=0$, impossible. Thus the open complements $\mathbb{Z}\setminus F_n$ form an increasing cover with no finite subcover. The topology is Hausdorff because distinct integers are distinct modulo a sufficiently large integer, but is not compact.

A pro-$p$ ring is a topological ring with continuous ring operations whose underlying additive group is a pro-p group. Standard local analytic examples are complete Noetherian local rings with finite residue field of characteristic $p$, such as ${\mathbb{Z}}_p$ and ${\mathbb{F}}_p[[t]]$. The topology is essential to the convergence of power series used for analytic group operations.

A quotient topological space is a quotient set equipped with the quotient topology. For a concrete gluing, give the closed interval $I=[0,1]$ its usual subspace topology, identify $0\sim 1$, and leave every interior point in its own singleton equivalence class. The resulting quotient space is a circle: the two endpoints become one point, while interior points remain distinct.

The exact continuous map to the unit circle in the plane isHere sine and cosine give $p(0)=p(1)=(1,0)$, and $p(s)=p(t)$ holds exactly when $s=t$ or $\{s,t\}=\{0,1\}$. Thus $p$ induces a bijection $\bar{p}:I/\sim \to S^1$. ^[ref] The universal property of the quotient topology makes $\bar{p}$ continuous. The quotient of a compact space is compact, and the unit circle is Hausdorff, so the compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem makes $\bar{p}$ a homeomorphism. This verifies the topology, not merely the point identifications.

To inspect an open neighbourhood of the seam, choose $0<\epsilon <1/2$ and let $U_{\epsilon }=p([0,\epsilon )\cup (1-\epsilon ,1])$. Its full preimage isBoth pieces are open in the subspace topology on $I$, so $U_{\epsilon }$ is open in the circle. In contrast, $A=[0,\epsilon )$ is open in $I$, butis not open in $I$: it contains $1$ without any neighbourhood of $1$. Hence $p(A)$ is not open in the circle. A quotient map can therefore fail to be an open map.

For a continuous function $f:I\to \mathbb{R}$, the only gluing condition is $f(0)=f(1)$. For example, $f(t)=\cos (2\pi t)$ defines a continuous function on the circle, whereas $f(t)=t$ does not. This lets us use an interval as a coordinate for a periodic function while making the seam invisible. More general quotient spaces encode glued geometric pieces in the same way: describe continuous maps before gluing and check that their values agree on every equivalence class.

The Hausdorff property need not survive a quotient topology. In the non-Hausdorff quotient of the real line by rational translation, $x\sim y$ means $x-y\in \mathbb{Q}$. A nonempty open preimage $W$ must contain all translates by rational numbers of any open interval inside it. The density of the rational numbers then forces $W=\mathbb{R}$: for any $y$, some rational number $r$ has $y-r$ in that interval. Thus this quotient space has the indiscrete topology. The irrationality of the square root of two gives distinct equivalence classes for $0$ and $\sqrt{2}$, so this quotient space is not Hausdorff. Unlike the endpoint-gluing circle, this gluing identifies a dense subset with each point.

The quotient topology turns an instruction to glue points together into a precise topological space. Start with a topological space $(X,{\tau }_X)$ and an equivalence relation $\sim$. The quotient set $X/\sim$ consists of equivalence classes, and its canonical projection of a quotient set isThe quotient topology is defined by the rule using preimages of open sets:Thus a subset of the quotient space is open if and only if its entire preimage is open in $X$. Each fiber $q^{-1}(\{[x]\})$ is the whole equivalence class $[x]$, so the preimage includes every point glued to any of its members.^[ref]

This is the finest topology making $q$ a continuous map: every topology with that property can contain only subsets whose preimages are open. It really is a topology, because preimages preserve the empty set, the whole set, arbitrary unions, and finite intersections. The gluing example below shows why checking a complete preimage matters, especially at the seam.

The quotient topology also makes continuous maps out of a glued space easy to construct. A continuous map $f:X\to Z$ descends to a unique continuous map $\bar{f}:X/\sim \to Z$ exactly when it is constant on every fiber of $q$, meaning $x\sim y\Rightarrow f(x)=f(y)$. Define $\bar{f}([x])=f(x)$; the equivalence class representative cannot affect the answer. For every open set $V\subseteq Z$,The right side is open, so the quotient topology makes ${\bar{f}}^{-1}(V)$ open. Conversely, if $f=\bar{f}\circ q$ for a continuous map $\bar{f}$, then composition of continuous functions makes $f$ continuous, and equal equivalence classes force equal values. This is the universal property of the quotient topology. ^[ref]

A surjective continuous map is not automatically a quotient map. On the same two-point set $D=\{a,b\}$, take the identity map from the discrete topology to the indiscrete topology. It is continuous and surjective, but $\{a\}$ is not open in the target even though its preimage is open in the domain. The quotient topology for this identity map would be the discrete topology. Thus continuity supplies only one direction of the rule using preimages of open sets; a quotient map requires both.

A quotient space of a space carrying the cofinite topology has a topology contained in the cofinite topology on its underlying quotient set. If $q:X\to Y$ is the quotient map and $U$ is a nonempty open subset of $Y$, its preimage has finite complement. Since $q$ is surjective, the complement of $U$ is the image of that finite complement, hence is finite. Equality need not hold: partition $\mathbb{Z}$ into its even and odd integers. Both classes are infinite, so their two-point quotient space has the indiscrete topology, whereas the cofinite topology on a finite set is the discrete topology.

Let $(u_n,v_n)\to (0,0)$ with both coordinates nonzero, $r_n=|u_n|/4$, $s_n=|v_n|/4$, and $\varphi (t)=\max (1-|t|,0)$. The displayed function equals one at every $(u_n,v_n)$ and zero on both coordinate axes. Each coordinate line off the corresponding axis meets only finitely many supports, so its restriction is a finite maximum of continuous functions. On the axes it is zero. Hence $B$ is separately continuous and disproves convergence of this sequence in any topology making every separately continuous function continuous. Isotropic radial bumps need not have this property when one coordinate approaches zero much faster than the other.

Given a nonempty family $\mathcal{P}$ of finite-valued seminorms on a real or complex vector space $E$, its seminorm topology has basic open zero neighbourhoodsTheir translates form a basis of a topology. Only finite intersections are required: an infinite intersection might impose a stronger topology. Equivalently, put $q(x)={\max }_i{p}_i(x)/{\epsilon }_i$; then $q$ is a seminorm and $U=\{q<1\}$. See Günther Hörmann, Advanced Functional Analysis, section 4, neighbourhood systems from seminorms for the general construction.

Each defining seminorm is continuous, since $|p(x)-p(y)|\le p(x-y)$. A sequence satisfies $x_n\to x$ precisely when $p(x_n-x)\to 0$ for every $p\in \mathcal{P}$; the same criterion holds for nets. Finitely many measurements can each meet a prescribed tolerance after a common index.

The seminorm axioms also establish the required joint continuity of vector addition and scalar multiplication:For a basic neighbourhood, apply these estimates to its finitely many seminorms; near ${\lambda }_0$ the absolute value $|\lambda |$ is bounded. This gives a locally convex space even when some directions are invisible to every measurement.

A function of several variables is separately continuous when it is continuous in each variable with the others fixed. This is weaker than joint continuity in the product topology. Functions with narrow rectangular supports provide useful examples distinguishing convergence in topologies generated by separate continuity from Euclidean convergence.

A simplicial homeomorphism is the homeomorphism of geometric realizations induced by an isomorphism of simplicial complexes: a bijection of their vertex sets such that a finite vertex set is a simplex exactly when its image is a simplex. The map acts linearly in each barycentric coordinate system. It and its inverse are continuous by the realization topology. Between the boundaries of two triangles, any bijection of the three vertices extends linearly on edges to a simplicial homeomorphism. This ensures that the edge identifications agree at common endpoints.