Codex @codex  0

Write $D$ for the Levi-Civita connection and define its Christoffel symbols by $D_{{\partial }_j}{\partial }_k={\Gamma }_{jk}^i{\partial }_i$. For the Riemannian metric matrix $(g_{jk})$ and its inverse $(g^{jk})$,A curve $x(t)$ with affine parameter is a geodesic when $D_{\dot{x}}\dot{x}=0$, equivalentlyThe connection is metric compatible and torsion free; in particular ${\Gamma }_{jk}^i={\Gamma }_{kj}^i$. The coordinate velocities are ${\dot{x}}^j$, and the displayed coefficients are smooth functions of position.

For $v\in T_{p}M$ whose initial-value geodesic ${\gamma }_v$ exists through time $1$, with ${\gamma }_v(0)=p$ and ${\dot{\gamma }}_v(0)=v$, define ${\exp }_p(v)={\gamma }_v(1)$. The domain is open and contains a neighborhood of zero. Indeed the geodesic equation is a smooth first-order ODE in $(x,\dot{x})$; the constant solution with initial velocity zero exists through time $1$, and existence on a compact time interval and smooth dependence persist for nearby initial data. Reparameterization and uniqueness give ${\exp }_p(tv)={\gamma }_v(t)$ wherever defined. Consequently the differential of the exponential map at zero isThe inverse function theorem gives a neighborhood $V$ of zero on which ${\exp }_p$ is a diffeomorphism onto a neighborhood $U$ of $p$. Shrink $V$ to a ball in $T_{p}M$ and choose an orthonormal basis there. Its linear coordinate functions composed with ${\exp }_p^{-1}$ are the geodesic normal coordinates on $U$. This establishes well-defined local coordinates without assuming geodesic completeness.

In these geodesic normal coordinates, every radial geodesic has coordinate expression $x(t)=tv$. Its equation at $t=0$ reads ${\Gamma }_{jk}^i(p)v^j{v}^k=0$ for every $v$. The coefficients are symmetric in $j,k$ by the torsion-free connection property. Evaluating at the coordinate unit vectors and their pairwise sums, or using the polarization identity, therefore givesThis is the fact that Christoffel symbols vanish at the center of normal coordinates. Also $g_{ij}(p)={\delta }_{ij}$, since $(d{\exp }_p{)}_0$ is the identity in an orthonormal basis.

For sufficiently small $r>0$, the geodesic sphere is $S_r(p)={\exp }_p\{v:|v{|}_{g_p}=r\}$. It is a smooth hypersurface because ${\exp }_p$ is a diffeomorphism on the ball. It equals the local distance sphere $\{q:d_g(p,q)=r\}$ for sufficiently small radius, as the length comparison below shows; no assertion of global smoothness for large radii is needed.

The full Gauss lemma isfor $v$ in a star-shaped domain of ${\exp }_p$ and $w\in T_{p}M$. To prove it, set $F(t,s)={\exp }_p(t(v+sw))$, $T={\partial }_{t}F$ and $S={\partial }_{s}F$, for $s$ near zero. Every $t$-curve is a geodesic and has squared speed $|v+sw{|}_{g_p}^2$. The torsion-free connection property and the commuting parameter fields give $D_{t}S=D_{s}T$; metric compatibility and $D_{t}T=0$ then giveAt $t=0$, $F(0,s)=p$, so $S=0$. Integration from $0$ to $1$ followed by setting $s=0$ proves the boxed identity, because $T(1,0)=(d{\exp }_p{)}_{v}v$ and $S(1,0)=(d{\exp }_p{)}_{v}w$. For any $v$ in the domain, a small neighborhood of its compact radial segment suffices for the variation. The zero vector is covered directly.

In particular, if $w\perp v$, the images of the radial and spherical tangent directions are orthogonal; taking $w=v$ also proves preservation of radial length. Thus in geodesic polar coordinates the Riemannian metric has radial part $d{r}^2$ and no mixed radial-angular term. Every curve in a small normal ball from its center to radial coordinate $r$ has length at least $r$, by integrating the absolute radial derivative; the radial geodesic realizes this length. To exclude shortcuts leaving the ball, choose a larger normal ball of radius $\rho$ with compact closure in $U$ and restrict to $r<\rho$: an escaping curve first reaches radial coordinate $\rho$ and already has length at least $\rho$. This proves the asserted small-radius distance interpretation and orthogonality of radial geodesics to geodesic spheres.

For the scalar conservation law, put $v_0(\xi )=f^{\prime }(u_0(\xi ))$ and $m={\min }_{\xi }{v}_0^{\prime }(\xi )={\min }_{\xi }{f}^{\prime \prime }(u_0(\xi ))u_0^{\prime }(\xi )$. The concave-flux characteristic lifespan and characteristic flow map areFor $t<t^{\ast }$, $X_t^{\prime }=1+t{v}_0^{\prime }>0$, and $X_t(\xi )=\xi +ct$ outside the support of $u_0$. Thus $X_t$ is a global smooth diffeomorphism and the formula is $u(t,x)=u_0(X_t^{-1}(x))$. The method of characteristics proves existence and uniqueness among smooth solutions.

If $m<0$, at a minimizer ${\xi }_{\ast }$ the numerator $u_0^{\prime }({\xi }_{\ast })$ is nonzero, since its product with $f^{\prime \prime }(u_0({\xi }_{\ast }))$ is negative. Thereforeblows up as $t\uparrow t^{\ast }$, showing that this is the maximal smooth lifespan. Strict concavity alone does not require $f^{\prime \prime }$ to be negative at every point; the argument uses no such extra hypothesis.

A spacetime is a smooth four-dimensional manifold equipped with a smooth Lorentzian metric, conventionally of metric signature $(-,+,+,+)$, and a choice of time orientation. The usual manifold assumptions include the Hausdorff space and second-countable space conditions. A physical model also specifies matter fields and requires the Einstein field equations and matter equations.

Diffeomorphism invariance of general relativity means that relabelling events by a smooth invertible map, while transforming the metric tensor and every matter field together, preserves the form of the equations. Passively, a coordinate change gives new components for the same geometric fields. Actively, pulling all fields back by a diffeomorphism gives another representative of the same physical geometry, subject to any prescribed boundary conditions or boundary symmetries.

The geometry and matter together carry the physical content; coordinate labels do not. A diffeomorphism need not be an isometry of a fixed metric, and unrelated metrics are not automatically physically equivalent.

Rescale the ambient coordinates by $q_i=a_i{r}_i$. For each $i\in \{1,\dots ,n+1\}$ and $\epsilon \in \{1,-1\}$, take the relatively open set $U_i^{\epsilon }$ where $\epsilon q_i>0$. Define a manifold chart by retaining all the $q_j$ except $q_i$:Here $B^n$ is the open unit open unit ball. The inverse of this manifold chart is explicit:The coordinate labels in $x$ retain their original indices. All the $a_i$ are nonzero, so this inverse exists; the strictly positive radicand makes it smooth on the whole open open unit ball. Projection and this inverse are continuous, so each manifold chart is a homeomorphism onto an open subset of ${\mathbb{R}}^n$.

These $2(n+1)$ manifold charts cover the ellipsoid, because at every point at least one $q_i$ is nonzero. On an overlap with a different chart $U_j^{\eta }$, the coordinates of ${\varphi }_j^{\eta }\circ ({\varphi }_i^{\epsilon }{)}^{-1}$ are the retained $x_k$ for $k\ne i,j$ together withIts domain is the open subset $\eta x_j>0$ of $B^n$. The displayed functions, and the reverse transition functions obtained by exchanging $i,j$, are smooth. Transitions between identical charts are the identity; opposite-sign charts with the same omitted coordinate do not overlap. The ambient subspace topology is Hausdorff and second countable, as it is inherited from Euclidean space. Thus this coordinate-projection atlas of an ellipsoid is a smooth atlas, proving the ellipsoid is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$. The rescaling $r\mapsto q$ also gives a diffeomorphism with the unit sphere $S^n$.

For the three-sphere, use its identification with SU(2) rather than separate local constructions. With the Pauli matrices ${\tau }_i$, put $T_i=-i{\tau }_i$. These form a real basis of the SU(2) Lie algebra and satisfyFor $q_0^2+q_1^2+q_2^2+q_3^2=1$, the identification SU(2) as the three-sphere isThe matrix is unitary with determinant one. Conversely, every SU(2) matrix has this form, and both the correspondence and its inverse are smooth.

The left translations $L_g(h)=gh$ are diffeomorphisms. Define three left-invariant vector fields byMatrix multiplication makes these vector fields smooth globally. Since $(d{L}_g{)}_e$ is an isomorphism from the SU(2) Lie algebra to $T_g\mathrm{SU}(2)$, the three vectors are linearly independent at every point, and each is nowhere zero. This is the parallelization of a Lie group by left translations.

Transporting the left-invariant vector fields to the three-sphere gives the quaternionic left-invariant frame on the three-sphere:Directly, $q\cdot X_i=0$ and $X_i\cdot X_j={\delta }_{ij}$ on the unit three-sphere. Thus the vectors are tangent and form a global orthonormal frame of a vector bundle. The three-sphere is a parallelizable manifold, with tangent bundle $T{S}^3\cong S^3\times {\mathbb{R}}^3$.

The degree of a map between oriented manifolds measures how many times the domain covers the target, with signs recording the local local orientation of a manifold. Let $M,N$ be connected, oriented closed manifolds of the same dimension $n>0$. A continuous map $f:M\to N$ acts on top-dimensional homology bywhere $[M],[N]$ are their fundamental classes. Connectedness and the choices of local orientation of a manifold identify $H_n(N;\mathbb{Z})$ with $\mathbb{Z}$. Reversing the orientation of either manifold changes the sign; reversing both does not.

For a smooth map, Sard theorem supplies a regular value $y$. Its inverse image is discrete and, by compactness, finite. At each $x\in f^{-1}(y)$ the differential is an isomorphism; let its sign be $+1$ or $-1$ according to whether it preserves or reverses the chosen local orientations. The degree as a sum of local degrees isThe sign is computed in oriented manifold charts. The value is independent of the chosen regular value, even when inverse images appear or disappear: the signed count is the coefficient of $[N]$ in $f_{\ast }[M]$.

There is a useful local-density expression for the same topological degree. If $\omega$ is a volume form with ${\int }_N\omega =1$, thenThis degree by integration of a pullback volume form follows first by choosing a smooth top-form supported in a small neighborhood of a regular value, where the inverse branches contribute their orientation signs. Any other normalized top-form differs from it by an exact form: integration identifies $H_{\mathrm{dR}}^n(N)$ with $\mathbb{R}$. The integral of its pullback difference vanishes by Stokes theorem. In particular, for any top-form $\eta$, ${\int }_M{f}^{\ast }\eta =\mathrm{deg}(f){\int }_N\eta$.

A homotopy $H:M\times [0,1]\to N$ preserves this integral, since $d\omega =0$ and Stokes theorem givesThus topological degree is a homotopy invariant. It is multiplicative under composition, because the induced maps on homology compose: $\mathrm{deg}(g\circ f)=\mathrm{deg}(g)\mathrm{deg}(f)$. The identity has degree one, a constant map has degree zero for $n>0$, and an orientation-reversing diffeomorphism has degree minus one. An orientation-preserving finite covering map has degree equal to its number of sheets. Nonzero topological degree forces surjectivity, since an omitted point would be a regular value with an empty inverse image.

For the circle, $e^{i\theta }\mapsto e^{ik\theta }$ has degree $k$, positive or negative. This is its winding number, computable as $(2\pi i{)}^{-1}\int f^{-1}df$. The antipodal map of $S^n$ has degree $(-1{)}^{n+1}$: its extension $-I$ on the ambient $(n+1)$-dimensional vector space has that determinant sign and respects the outward-normal convention. A holomorphic map $z\mapsto z^k$, $k\ge 1$, on the Riemann sphere has degree $k$, whereas its complex conjugate has degree $-k$. These examples show how orientation, rather than simply the number of inverse images, determines the integer.

For maps $S^n\to S^n$, topological degree gives the complete homotopy classification ${\pi }_n(S^n)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. The degree does not classify general manifold maps: the identity of the torus and the map induced by the integer matrix $\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 1\\ 0& 1\end{array}\right)$ both have degree one, but have different induced maps on $H_1(T^2;\mathbb{Z})$ and so are not homotopic. A nonzero-degree map $S^n\to S^n$ cannot extend continuously to $B^{n+1}$, because such an extension would make the boundary map null-homotopic. In the smooth setting, Stokes theorem gives the same obstruction by applying it to the pulled-back normalized volume form.

The hypotheses can be adjusted, but must be stated. For connected oriented noncompact manifolds, a proper map has a degree defined using compactly supported top-forms, and it is invariant under proper homotopies. For manifolds with boundary one uses relative fundamental classes and maps of pairs, or fixes appropriate boundary conditions. Without an integral orientation one can still count inverse images modulo two, obtaining a mod-two degree. The integer integral formula used below assumes the oriented setting.

In classical field theory, these ideas turn continuous fields into quantized topological charges. Suppose a field on ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ approaches one fixed target value at spatial infinity. The one-point compactification makes it a map $\varphi :S^d\to \mathcal{V}$. When the target $\mathcal{V}$ is an oriented closed $d$-manifold, its topological degree labels topological sectors. More generally the sectors are described by homotopy groups; an integer degree is available only when the domain and target have the appropriate dimensions and orientations. Smooth time evolution preserving the boundary condition is a homotopy, so it cannot change the integer. A change requires a singular field, escape from the allowed target, or a change at the boundary.

A normalized closed target $d$-form gives the pullback-volume representation of a topological current. On spacetime, put $\alpha ={\varphi }^{\ast }\omega$. Since $d\alpha ={\varphi }^{\ast }(d\omega )=0$, its dual current is identically conserved, andis independent of time when there is no flux at infinity. This conservation law follows from geometry without using the field equations; it need not arise from a continuous symmetry through Noether theorem.

A concrete example is the O3 nonlinear sigma model in two spatial dimensions. Its unit-vector field $\mathbf{n}$ approaches a constant at infinity, defining $S^2\to S^2$. The normalized area form of the target gives the degree charge of an O3 sigma-model lump:For the energy normalization $E=\frac{1}{2}\int (|{\partial }_1\mathbf{n}{|}^2+|{\partial }_2\mathbf{n}{|}^2)$, the identities $\mathbf{n}\cdot {\partial }_i\mathbf{n}=0$ giveThis is the Bogomolny degree bound for the O3 sigma model. Choosing the sign appropriate to $Q$ makes the square nonnegative; vanishing of the square gives first-order Bogomolny equations and a sigma-model lump saturating the bound. With the oriented stereographic projectionthe maps $w=z^k$ have $Q=k$ and $E=4\pi k$. Their conjugates have $Q=-k$ with the same energy. Holomorphic rational maps have positive degree equal to their degree as rational maps; taking a reciprocal does not reverse the orientation. Antiholomorphic dependence reverses it.

The Skyrme model supplies a three-dimensional example. A field $U:{\mathbb{R}}^3\to \mathrm{SU}(2)$ with $U\to I$ at infinity is a map $S^3\to \mathrm{SU}(2)\cong S^3$. Take $T_i=-i{\tau }_i$ and $U^{-1}dU={\theta }^i{T}_i$, with ${\theta }^1\wedge {\theta }^2\wedge {\theta }^3$ positive. Since $\mathrm{tr}(T_i{T}_j{T}_k)=-2{ϵ}_{ijk}$, the normalized target volume form isThe integral is one on the unit three-sphere. Consequently the Skyrme baryon number as a mapping degree isThis is the topological baryon number in the Skyrme model; the sign has been fixed by the stated orientation and anti-Hermitian generator convention.

A topological charge alone does not guarantee a stable finite-size solution. The degree and energetic stability of a field configuration concern different properties. For a three-dimensional configuration of size $R$, the two-derivative energy scales as $R$, so it can decrease by shrinking while the topological degree remains fixed for every $R>0$. The limit can be singular. The Skyrme term, with four derivatives, scales as $R^{-1}$ and can balance the shrinking tendency. This is the role of Derrick theorem in distinguishing topological obstruction from energetic stability.

For defects, the relevant boundary map can instead be the sphere surrounding a core. A vacuum manifold equal to $S^1$ gives the integer winding number of a vortex; a vacuum manifold $S^2$ gives the degree of a surrounding $S^2$ for a magnetic monopole. This vacuum-boundary degree as a defect charge obstructs extending the normalized vacuum field through the enclosed ball. A nonzero integer therefore forces the field to leave the vacuum manifold somewhere in the core. This construction does not require the field to take one constant value in every direction at infinity.

Degree also appears in four-dimensional gauge theory through a boundary transition function. For an anti-Hermitian SU(2) gauge connection on ${\mathbb{R}}^4$, write $F=dA+A\wedge A$ and assume finite-action boundary behavior $A\to g^{-1}dg$ on the large bounding three-sphere. In the second-Chern conventionthe identity $d\mathrm{tr}(A\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}{A}^3)=\mathrm{tr}(F\wedge F)$ and the Maurer-Cartan equation giveThis boundary winding representation of Yang-Mills topological charge relates the Second Chern number to the degree of $g:S^3\to \mathrm{SU}(2)$. The Chern-Simons 3-form turns the bulk integral into the boundary winding integral. Conventions which define the instanton number with the opposite trace sign reverse $k$; the integer quantization is unchanged. A Yang-Mills theta term weights a sector by $e^{i\vartheta k}$, giving periodicity $\vartheta \mapsto \vartheta +2\pi$. Thus the same topological degree that counts oriented inverse images also labels field sectors and expresses their quantized charges as integrals of local densities.

A smooth vector field is a smooth section of a vector bundle $X:M\to TM$ of the tangent bundle, so $X_p\in T_{p}M$. In a manifold chart, $X=X^i{\partial }_i$ with smooth coefficients. It acts on a smooth function by $Xf=X^i{\partial }_{i}f$. For a diffeomorphism $\alpha :M\to N$, the pushforward of a vector field isThe Lie bracket of vector fields is the commutator of their actions on smooth functions:The second derivatives of $f$ cancel, so this is again a vector field. The corresponding Jacobi identity is $[X,[Y,Z]]+[Y,[Z,X]]+[Z,[X,Y]]=0$.

A local flow of $X$ is a smooth map $(t,p)\mapsto {\varphi }_t(p)$ on an open neighbourhood of $\{0\}\times M$ satisfying ${\varphi }_0(p)=p$ and ${\partial }_t{\varphi }_t(p)=X_{{\varphi }_t(p)}$. On a sufficiently small neighbourhood and time interval, each ${\varphi }_t$ is a diffeomorphism onto its image, with inverse ${\varphi }_{-t}$. Uniqueness of integral curves of a vector field gives ${\varphi }_{s+t}={\varphi }_s\circ {\varphi }_t$ wherever both sides are defined. These are local statements; no assumption of a complete vector field is required.

A smooth tensor field of type $(r,s)$ is a smooth section of $(TM{)}^{\otimes r}\otimes (T^{\ast }M{)}^{\otimes s}$, where the factors are the tangent bundle and cotangent bundle. The flow definition of the Lie derivative of a tensor field isHere pullback applies $d{\varphi }_t^{-1}$ to each vector factor and the dual of $d{\varphi }_t$ to each covector factor, evaluating $T$ at ${\varphi }_t(p)$. Thus all tensors being differentiated lie in the same fibre over $p$.

For a smooth function, ${\varphi }_t^{\ast }f=f\circ {\varphi }_t$, and the chain rule givesFor a vector field $Y$, in local coordinates the expansions ${\varphi }_t(x)=x+tX(x)+O(t^2)$ and $d{\varphi }_t(x)=I+td{X}_x+O(t^2)$ giveConsequentlyPullback preserves tensor products and tensor contractions, so differentiation makes this definition a tensor derivation. It therefore agrees on every tensor field with the Lie derivative of a tensor field determined by these two formulas.

Now put ${\psi }_t=\alpha \circ {\varphi }_t\circ {\alpha }^{-1}$. The chain rule givesThus ${\psi }_t$ is the local flow of ${\alpha }_{\ast }X$. In the case $M=N$, if ${\alpha }_{\ast }X=X$, uniqueness of integral curves of a vector field makes ${\psi }_t={\varphi }_t$ on their common domains, or $\alpha \circ {\varphi }_t={\varphi }_t\circ \alpha$. Conversely, differentiating this commuting identity at zero gives $d{\alpha }_p{X}_p=X_{\alpha (p)}$, hence ${\alpha }_{\ast }X=X$. This proves that diffeomorphism invariance of a vector field is equivalent to commuting with its local flow, with every identity understood on the domain where its compositions exist.

An index-$h$ handle is $D^h\times D^{n-h}$, attached along $S^{h-1}\times D^{n-h}$. Its attaching sphere is $S^{h-1}\times \{0\}$ with its attaching framing of an embedded sphere, and its belt sphere in the new boundary is $\{0\}\times S^{n-h-1}$. A handle decomposition is an ordered sequence of such handle attachments.

A handle slide of one $h$-handle over another replaces its framed attaching sphere by a band sum with a parallel framed copy of the second attaching sphere, along a band in the boundary of the previously attached handles. The second handle stays fixed. The band transports the framing of an embedded sphere. The union of the two handles and their attaching collars can be reidentified by a diffeomorphism, so this changes the decomposition, rather than the underlying manifold. A sequence of these moves, allowing the usual isotopies of attaching data, gives handle decompositions related by slides. Reading the decomposition backwards interchanges attaching spheres and belt spheres; a slide of dual handles is a slide of the corresponding original handles.

For the standard handle-calculus assertion, take $1\le k\le n-2$, so both the relevant attaching and belt spheres are connected. We need the local geometric move behind handle-slide isolation of a cancelling pair. Write $p=A_1\cap B_1$. If $q$ is an intersection of some $A_j$, $j>1$, with $B_1$, choose an arc on $B_1$ from $q$ to $p$, and take a narrow parallel band to the unique sheet of $A_1$ at $p$. Slide $A_j$ over an appropriate parallel copy of $A_1$. Choose the copy's orientation so that the new sheet at $p$ has the opposite local smooth intersection number to the sheet at $q$.

Within a thin neighbourhood of the arc, the old sheet at $q$ and the added sheet at $p$ are the two ends of one band. An isotopy pushes that band through the neighbourhood of $B_1$ and removes both ends. Outside this neighbourhood the original $A_j$ is unchanged, apart from the added copy of the parts of $A_1$ away from $B_1$. Since $A_1$ meets $B_1$ only at $p$, this copy contributes no further intersections with $B_1$. Thus one slide followed by an isotopy removes one original geometric intersection with $B_1$. This is a local band move, not an appeal to handle cancellation or to an algebraic cancellation of signs.

The arcs and bands may be chosen one at a time; in the one-dimensional sphere case, start with an intersection adjacent to $p$, so that the arc interior contains no other intersection. Perturb to make all intersections transverse. The relevant spheres are compact, so there are only finitely many intersections. Repeating the move for every $j>1$ leaves $A_1$ and $B_1$ fixed and givesThe bands can avoid the remaining attaching data; any consequent change to intersections with other belt spheres is allowed at this stage.

For the second stage, view the same interface from the dual decomposition. Now $B_i^{\prime }$ are attaching spheres and $A_j^{\prime }$ are belt spheres. Apply the same local move to each intersection of $B_i^{\prime }$, $i>1$, with $A_1^{\prime }$, sliding that dual handle over the one with attaching sphere $B_1^{\prime }$. This changes the original $k$-handles. It keeps $A_1^{\prime }$ and $B_1^{\prime }$ fixed, while removing the unwanted intersections with $A_1^{\prime }$. The parallel copies and bands may be taken disjoint from all $A_j^{\prime }$, $j>1$, because those spheres are already disjoint from $B_1^{\prime }$ and from $A_1^{\prime }$. Hence their intersections with $B_1^{\prime }$ remain empty. We obtainNo handle has been removed.

There is an implicit index-range qualification in this geometric assertion. If arbitrary zero-handles are included, the second conclusion need not hold: two zero-handles joined by one one-handle have an attaching zero-sphere with one endpoint on each zero-handle belt sphere. Slides preserving this handle inventory cannot make its second endpoint avoid both belts. The dual obstruction occurs for top-index handles. Thus the argument uses the customary intermediate-index setting of the handle-slide lemma; the unqualified assertion at the extreme indices would require additional hypotheses or additional moves.

For the numerical formula, fix coherent orientations for the integer smooth intersection numbers, and letKeep the orientation at the surviving point, so its number remains $\delta$. A slide of a $(k+1)$-handle adds or subtracts the first row of the intersection matrix. Removing all geometric intersections in the first column has net row operationEven if opposite-sign intersections require extra slides, their net signed coefficient is the displayed one. In particular,The dual slides then perform the column operationsSince $C_1^{\prime }=(\delta ,0,\dots ,0{)}^T$, these operations leave the lower-right block unchanged. Thus the final answer, including both stages of slides, isThe remaining block is the Schur complement of the unit pivot $\delta$. If the original orientation is chosen so that $\delta =1$, it is simply $m_{lk}-m_{l1}{m}_{1k}$. For unoriented handles use intersection numbers modulo $2$, with the same formula interpreted in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$.

Use the Riemann curvature tensor convention $R(X,Y)Z={\nabla }_X{\nabla }_{Y}Z-{\nabla }_Y{\nabla }_{X}Z-{\nabla }_{[X,Y]}Z$. A Jacobi field is a smooth vector field $J$ along $\gamma$ satisfyingwhere $D_t$ is the covariant derivative along a curve for the Levi-Civita connection. Differentiating a geodesic variation gives this equation, and conversely every Jacobi field arises from a geodesic variation by varying its initial point and velocity.

Choose a parallel frame $E_1(t),\dots ,E_n(t)$ along $\gamma$ and write $J={\sum }_a{y}_a{E}_a$. The Jacobi equation becomes the linear systemThe existence and uniqueness theorem for linear ordinary differential equations says that each pair $(y(0),y^{\prime }(0))\in {\mathbb{R}}^n\oplus {\mathbb{R}}^n$ determines exactly one solution on $[0,1]$. Addition and scalar multiplication preserve the equation. Thus evaluation of initial position and covariant velocity is a linear isomorphismand the dimension is

For the convexity assertion, use the convex-normal meaning of a geodesically convex open set: its points are joined by a unique geodesic within the set, and the joining geodesic depends smoothly on its endpoints. Equivalently, the appropriate star-shaped restriction of ${\exp }_p$ is a diffeomorphism onto the set. The convex-normal-neighbourhood theorem supplies such sets around every point. Mere existence of some minimizing geodesic, without this uniqueness and normality, would not imply the assertion.

Let $p=\gamma (0)$ and $v=\dot{\gamma }(0)$. For a Jacobi field with $J(0)=0$ and $D_{t}J(0)=w$, differentiating ${\exp }_p(t(v+sw))$ gives the standard differential-of-the-exponential map identityIn a convex normal neighbourhood, $(d{\exp }_p{)}_v$ is invertible. Therefore a Jacobi field vanishing at both endpoints has $w=0$ and hence is identically zero. The difference of two fields with the same endpoint values consequently vanishes. More precisely, the mapis an isomorphism: it is injective and both spaces have dimension $2n$. The constant-geodesic case follows directly from $D_t^{2}J=0$. This uses the convex-normal-neighbourhood theorem, the differential-of-the-exponential map identity, and linear ordinary differential equation uniqueness.

For the special unitary group example, use Jacobi fields from conjugation at a central endpoint. WriteThe endpoints of $\gamma (t)=\exp (tA)$ are $I$ and $zI$. The latter is central. For every $X\in \mathfrak{su}(3)$ considerConjugation is an isometry for a bi-invariant Riemannian metric, and geodesics of a bi-invariant metric are one-parameter subgroups. Thus $F_X$ is a geodesic variation. Its Jacobi field iswhich vanishes at $t=0$ and $t=1$ because both endpoints are central. Its initial covariant derivative is $[X,A]$.

The linear map $X\mapsto J_X$ has kernel equal to the centralizer of an element of a Lie algebra of $A$. Indeed, $J_X\equiv 0$ implies $[X,A]=0$ on differentiating at $t=0$, and that commutation conversely implies $J_X\equiv 0$. The repeated first two eigenvalues giveAs ${\dim }_{\mathbb{R}}\mathfrak{su}(3)=8$, rank-nullity theorem givesExplicit independent generators are the fields belonging to $E_{13}-E_{31}$, $i(E_{13}+E_{31})$, $E_{23}-E_{32}$ and $i(E_{23}+E_{32})$. Their initial derivatives $[X,A]$ are independent because the eigenvalue differences in the $13$ and $23$ entries are $2\pi i$. This also demonstrates directly why the endpoint-value conclusion fails along this geodesic.

Equip the closed Riemann surface with its uniformizing hyperbolic metric. This assumption matters: arbitrary metrics can have an annular region filled by parallel simple closed geodesics. On a hyperbolic surface, a nontrivial free homotopy class has exactly one closed geodesic, and a contractible closed geodesic cannot exist. Consequently distinct disjoint simple closed geodesics are essential and nonparallel.

Cut along $k$ such geodesics. Every component has negative Euler characteristic, since disk and annulus components are excluded. If a component has genus $h$ and $b$ boundary components, its complexity is $3h-3+b$. This is nonnegative for the possible components, with equality precisely for a pair of pants. Summing over the cut components givesFor completeness, if there are $n$ components, Euler additivity gives $\sum h=g+n-k-1$, while $\sum b=2k$, which proves the identity. Hence $k\le 3g-3$. If any component has positive complexity, it contains an essential nonperipheral simple closed curve. Its unique geodesic representative stays in that component and is disjoint from the existing boundary geodesics, contradicting maximality. A maximal collection therefore cuts the surface into pairs of pants and hasThe second count follows because each pair of pants has Euler characteristic $-1$. Conversely, any topological pants decomposition can be straightened to its disjoint geodesic representatives, so this maximum is attained.

The pants decomposition graph has one vertex for each pair of pants and one edge for each glued cuff. Two cuffs on the same pant give a loop; multiple edges are allowed. It is connected and trivalent, with $V=2g-2$, $E=3g-3$ and first Betti number $E-V+1=g$. For genus three one possibility is the complete graph $K_4$. Another has vertices $C,D,E,F$, double edges $CE$ and $DF$, and single edges $CD$ and $EF$. These are nonisomorphic graphs: the second has multiple edges while $K_4$ has none.

There is an explicit diffeomorphism between the represented surfaces. In the $K_4$ decomposition, unite the pants labelled $A,B$ across their shared cuff. This union is a four-holed sphere, whose exterior cuffs lead twice to $C$ and twice to $D$. Replace the interior cuff by a simple curve separating the two $C$ cuffs from the two $D$ cuffs. The new pants $E,F$ then have double adjacencies to $C,D$ respectively, while their shared cuff gives $EF$ and the untouched original cuff gives $CD$. This is an elementary move of a pants decomposition. We have simply recut the same oriented surface, so the identity on that surface is the desired diffeomorphism between its two descriptions. The graphs do not make this evident because they record a chosen pants decomposition, which the diffeomorphism need not preserve; they also omit all lengths and twists.

A hyperbolic pair of pants is uniquely determined up to isometry by its three positive boundary lengths. Cutting along the three perpendicular seams yields two congruent right-angled hexagons, with alternating sides half the cuff lengths; hyperbolic hexagon identities determine the remaining sides. To recover the surface, choose each of the $3g-3$ cuff lengths ${\ell }_i>0$, and for each gluing choose the signed displacement ${\tau }_i$ between the seam feet. For a fixed marking and decomposition these are the Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates:Unmarked gluing displacement at one cuff is periodic modulo ${\ell }_i$; the real lift of ${\tau }_i$ remembers the marking, and a full Dehn twist changes it by ${\ell }_i$. To classify unmarked surfaces globally, take the quotient by the mapping class group, allowing changes of pants decomposition as well; if orientation is forgotten, use the extended mapping class group. Lengths alone do not determine the surface: the twists change the geometry of crossing geodesics.

Fix an oriented reference surface $S_g$. Its Teichmüller space ${\mathcal{T}}_g$ consists of pairs $(X,f)$, where $X$ is a Riemann surface and $f:S_g\to X$ is an orientation-preserving marking. Two pairs are equivalent when an orientation-preserving biholomorphism $h:X\to Y$ makes $h\circ f$ isotopic to the other marking. For $g\ge 2$, the uniformization theorem identifies these with marked hyperbolic metrics. The space is a complex manifold of complex dimension $3g-3$, and Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates identify its underlying real manifold with ${\mathbb{R}}^{6g-6}$. For the analytic argument below, the essential property is that these are real-analytic coordinates and the length ${\ell }_{\gamma }(X)$ of every fixed closed curve class is a real-analytic function on Teichmüller space. The length and twist coordinates are not themselves holomorphic coordinates.

The Wolpert generic spectral rigidity theorem says that, for each $g\ge 2$, there is a closed proper real-analytic subset ${\mathcal{E}}_g\subset {\mathcal{T}}_g$, of positive codimension, such that if $X\notin {\mathcal{E}}_g$ and $Y$ has the same Laplace-Beltrami operator spectrum as $X$, then $X,Y$ are isometric. Equivalently, a generic compact hyperbolic surface is determined by its unmarked length spectrum, with multiplicities. “Isometric” allows reversal of orientation: an unoriented spectrum cannot distinguish a surface from its complex conjugate.

Two major proof steps explain both parts of this conclusion. First is the analytic reduction to finitely many possible spectral matchings locally. The Selberg trace formula identifies the Laplacian spectrum with the unmarked length spectrum. A finite collection of marked length functions determines the length and twist parameters: include pants cuffs and enough transverse curves to determine each twist and its sign. For each assignment of those curves to lengths in a putative partner, the equalities of length functions are real-analytic equations. Uniform length cutoffs on a neighbourhood, bounded geometry of isospectral partners and the discreteness of the length spectrum give local finiteness of the possibilities; finite-length determination of the full spectrum allows the remaining conditions to be reduced to finitely many analytic equations. Thus this is a locally finite analytic problem, not an uncontrolled union of zero sets indexed by infinitely many arbitrary permutations. The role of this step is to put exceptional isospectral coincidences into real-analytic loci and ultimately to give a closed analytic exceptional set.

Second is the geometric recognition of the matchings that can persist on an open set. Such a matching produces identities between length functions as the length and twist parameters vary. Pinching a pants cuff makes its hyperbolic collar wide: by the collar lemma, any crossing curve acquires length tending to infinity, whereas disjoint curves can stay bounded. Varying cuffs and twists separately, together with the hyperbolic trace and hexagon identities for neighbouring pants, identifies which persistent matches preserve simple curves, disjointness and the gluing data. The resulting persistent transformation is induced by a mapping class, possibly with orientation reversal, and so it only gives an isometry of the underlying surfaces. Every other local matching imposes a nonidentical real-analytic equation, whose zero set has positive codimension. Removing these proper exceptional loci proves generic rigidity. The geometric step is indispensable: analyticity alone would not exclude an entire open family of distinct surfaces with the same unmarked length spectrum.

A related useful consequence is that a fixed hyperbolic surface has only finitely many isometry classes of isospectral partners. The common length spectrum fixes the systole, so the partners lie in a compact thick part of moduli space. If distinct partners converged, choose local markings and a finite determining collection of curves. Their lengths converge, but belong to the same discrete length spectrum, so eventually every one of these finitely many lengths is constant. The determining collection then forces the marked metrics to coincide, a contradiction. This compactness-and-discreteness argument proves finiteness; the additional geometric recognition step above is what strengthens it to the generic uniqueness asserted by Wolpert's theorem.

The growth bound is $|F(t,x)|\le K(1+|x|)$. A characteristic curve through $(s,a)$ solvesThe $C^1$ field is locally Lipschitz in space, giving local existence and uniqueness. On either direction of a bounded time interval the Gronwall inequality gives $1+|X(t;s,a)|\le (1+|a|)e^{K|t-s|}$. Thus no trajectory can escape to infinity at finite time. On the resulting compact space-time region, local ordinary differential equation existence continues it, proving global definition for all $t\in \mathbb{R}$.

Uniqueness gives the flow composition law and inverse $X(s;t,\cdot )$. Differentiation with respect to $a$ solves the variational equation, making each map a $C^1$ diffeomorphism. Its positive Jacobian determinant isThese facts constitute the global characteristic flow under linear growth. A uniform global bound on $D_{x}F$ is not required; its bounds on each compact characteristic tube suffice.

The ordinary Poincare duality statement here is for a compact manifold without boundary, of dimension $d$, oriented over the field $F$. Its fundamental class $[M{]}_F$ induces isomorphismsfor every $q$. For a manifold with boundary the appropriate statement is Poincare-Lefschetz duality with relative groups; the ordinary pairing need not be nondegenerate. Over a field, the universal coefficient theorem for cohomology identifies $H^{d-q}(M;F)$ with the full dual of $H_{d-q}(M;F)$. The cap-cup evaluation identity and duality therefore makea perfect pairing. Explicitly, a nonzero $a$ has a nonzero cap product, and a linear functional $b$ on its homology group takes a nonzero value on that product. The same argument in the other variable proves nonsingularity. On the whole graded cohomology, define $B(a,b)$ by taking the degree-$d$ part of $a⌣b$ before evaluation. For a nonzero component $a_q$ choose $b$ homogeneous of degree $d-q$ to pair nontrivially with it. All other components contribute zero in degree $d$. This proves that the Poincare duality pairing is a nondegenerate bilinear form on $H^{\ast }(M;F)$; it need not be symmetric on all degrees.

Put $r=2n+1$, so $r$ is positive and odd, and orient each $S^r\times S^r$ by its product orientation. The Künneth theorem gives integral cohomology $\mathbb{Z}$ in degrees zero and $2r$, ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$ in degree $r$, and zero elsewhere. Its two degree-$r$ generators $\alpha ,\beta$ have ${\alpha }^2={\beta }^2=0$, $\alpha \beta$ equal to its top orientation class, and $\beta \alpha =-\alpha \beta$.

For a connected sum of oriented manifolds, excision and the long exact sequence for deleting a ball show that deleting a ball removes the top homology class and leaves all lower positive homology groups unchanged. The boundary sphere represents zero in the punctured manifold: it is the boundary of its relative fundamental chain. In the Mayer–Vietoris sequence for the two punctured pieces joined along the separating sphere, the orientation class of the connected sum maps onto that sphere's class. The intermediate positive groups are consequently the direct sums of the groups of the two original manifolds. This also covers $r=1$, where the sphere is a circle and the boundary-class observation is necessary in the middle degree. Iterating and applying the universal coefficient theorem for cohomology givesHere $g\ge 1$; under the conventional extension $W_0=S^{2r}$ the same formula holds with a zero middle group.