Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 35D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 81 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
At , use fermionic Matsubara frequencies . The fermionic Gaussian integral has inverse propagator . With its thermal normalization, the determinant for one single-particle level is , as also follows from its empty and occupied states. Two spin species therefore giveThe expression labeled Helmholtz free energy in the PDF is the grand potential, since the trace contains . The thermodynamic Helmholtz free energy at a prescribed electron number is , with fixed by . The Matsubara determinant requires a normalization prescription; a raw infinite sum of logarithms is not an ordinary convergent sum.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 343 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The term means that the generator is the grand potential, rather than just the physical energy. With boundary variations vanishing, the Hamiltonian functional isIts functional derivative isso the Gross–Pitaevskii equation is . Treating and as independent variables in this variation gives the factor , not .
For repulsive interactions and , complete the square in the local energy:The gradient contribution is nonnegative, so the homogeneous ground state has arbitrary constant complex argument andThe infinite-volume constant may be subtracted to define a relative grand potential; it does not affect the functional derivative. At fixed particle number one instead minimizes the physical energy , with as its Lagrange multiplier. For , the grand-potential minimum over is the vacuum . For the displayed unconstrained functional is unbounded below; the positive-density stable uniform state assumed in the following parts requires repulsion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 343 1 iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Suppress tildes in the normalized equation and let . A Gross–Pitaevskii solitary wave stationary in these translating coordinates obeysThe boundary fixes the bulk complex argument and describes a localized disturbance with zero net vortex winding number; a vortex pair is possible. No extra plane-wave factor is needed when only the coordinates are changed. A full Galilean transformation of the field would additionally change the bulk flow and its complex argument convention.
Subtract the uniform background from the grand potential. A convenient dimensionless energy and the renormalized momentum of a condensate areThe subtraction in removes the troublesome background complex argument gradient. In particular, for the usual subsonic localized far field , , and , the energy density is and the momentum integrand is , both integrable in two dimensions. Merely writing without sufficient decay is not by itself a convergence proof. The common solitary-wave branch is subsonic: linearizing this normalization gives and speed of sound .
Integration by parts, with decaying variations and their boundary terms vanishing, givesThus the translating equation is precisely . Along a differentiable family with fixed bulk normalization, evaluate this stationarity on to obtainwhere . This energy–momentum slope of a solitary wave does not require differentiating the Lagrange multiplier inside the field variation. At a turning point the parametrized identity remains true, while need not be a single-valued function of locally. The chosen factors make , consistent with the normalized equation; changing the normalization of alone would change the claimed slope.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ii Paper 2 34D b iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
Differentiating the grand potential givesA reversible adiabatic change in an isolated gas keeps and fixed. To infer constant , one must check that this ratio is one-to-one, rather than merely assuming it.
Put , , and for . Integration by parts gives and , andThe strict inequality is the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for the positive weight , since is not constant on its support. This proves strict monotonicity of Fermi gas entropy per particle and hence is constant. Then gives constant, and givesThis adiabatic scaling of a Fermi gas with power-law density of states concerns positive temperature; the zero-temperature limit is a separate limiting case.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ii Paper 2 34D b i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
For noninteracting fermions, each single-particle level has occupation by the Pauli exclusion principle. A microstate has , , so its grand-canonical weight is the product of its independent level weights. The grand potential is ; the particle number, entropy and pressure follow from , and . This occupation description is the basis for the product, continuum and adiabatic calculations.
Summing separately over the two allowed occupations of every level givesThusThe factorization uses the absence of interactions; each level, including any degeneracy labels, is counted separately.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 1 36A b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 3 35A b i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
For an ultrarelativistic particle, . Including the two spin states of an electron, counting wavevectors in a sphere gives the density of statesThe grand canonical partition function of the ideal Fermi gas is thereforeSince the grand potential satisfies , integration by parts givesThusThis is the equation of state of an ideal ultrarelativistic gas.