Past exam of the superconductivity and Quantum Coherence course of the University of Cambridge / 2015 / Paper 1 / 1

A Josephson junction converts a relative condensate phase into a measurable current. For superconductors the relevant coherent object is a Cooper pair, with electric charge $q=-2e$. Its Gauge-invariant Josephson phase isWith a consistent directed-current convention, the weak-link relation is $I_s=I_c\sin \delta$. A voltage $V=U_2-U_1$ gives $\dot{\delta }=2eV/\hslash$, so a constant voltage produces the AC Josephson effect at frequency $2e|V|/h$. For neutral atom reservoirs the phase evolution instead follows their chemical-potential difference, $\hslash \dot{\delta }={\mu }_1-{\mu }_2$ with the displayed phase labeling. The current transfers atoms rather than electric charge, but still probes coherent matter-wave amplitudes.

A DC SQUID provides two coherent paths around a superconducting loop. Neglect loop self-inductance, take equal junction critical currents $I_0$, and let $\Phi$ be the enclosed flux. The relative junction phase differs by $2\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_0$, with superconducting flux quantum ${\Phi }_0=h/(2e)$. Adding the two sinusoidal currents and maximizing over their common phase givesFor unequal junctions the corresponding result is $\sqrt{I_1^2+I_2^2+2I_1{I}_2\cos (2\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_0)}$. Finite inductance and junction asymmetry alter the ideal modulation, so a measured minimum need not be zero. Flux changes a phase difference between the paths; the detector reads the resulting critical-current or voltage modulation. The Jaklevic Josephson interference experiment established superconducting interference experimentally.^[ref]

A bosonic Josephson junction uses two weakly linked Bose-Einstein condensates. In the Albiez double-well Josephson experiment, the population distribution was measured in situ and the relative phase inferred from interference fringes. The apparatus therefore tests both number transfer and phase coherence, rather than interpreting a density oscillation alone as a phase measurement. Interactions make the dynamics nonlinear: large imbalance can produce self-trapping instead of simple tunneling oscillations.^[ref]

The usefulness is interferometric sensitivity: a small phase perturbation can change a measurable current. It requires a coherent weak link, controlled phase noise and the appropriate particle's phase evolution; a generic insulating barrier between incoherent reservoirs is not already a matter-wave interferometer.

The superconducting critical current depends on temperature, magnetic field, sample geometry and the chosen dissipation criterion. For a magnet, a large superconducting critical current density matters because it permits a useful winding current with manageable conductor volume. The intrinsic depairing limit is an upper bound, but many practical type-II conductors become dissipative first through vortex motion.

A current exerts a transverse force per unit vortex length ${\mathbf{f}}_L=\mathbf{J}\times {\mathbf{\Phi }}_0$. Moving flux produces an electric field and dissipation. Flux pinning holds vortices at energetically favorable defects, allowing a larger transport current before motion. Useful conductors therefore need pinning as well as a sufficiently high transition temperature and upper critical field. Simply increasing disorder indefinitely is not a prescription: it can damage connectivity or superconductivity. High-angle grain boundaries in some copper-oxide materials also act as weak links, motivating controlled texture and connected current paths.

Conventional magnet conductors include niobium-titanium and niobium-tin; high-temperature coated conductors offer other operating regimes. Their performance must be compared on a superconducting critical surface in temperature, field and current density, with strain and thermal constraints also relevant. A high self-field current measured in a short sample does not by itself establish the current available throughout a high-field coil.

A superconducting magnet produces a strong, stable field without the normal winding's steady resistive power loss. Applications include magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear magnetic resonance and charged-particle beam steering or focusing in accelerators. A persistent-current loop is valuable when field stability matters. Refrigeration still requires power, and the magnet stores magnetic energy, approximately $L{I}^2/2$ in a linear inductance model. A local transition to a resistive state can release that stored energy as heat, so superconducting quench detection and protection are essential to operation. These requirements connect the microscopic vortex physics with useful engineering performance.

The superconducting order is a coherent pair amplitude, schematically $\Delta \propto ⟨c_{\downarrow }{c}_{\uparrow }⟩=|\Delta |e^{i\varphi }$. Under a global fermion phase change $c\mapsto e^{i\alpha }c$, it acquires phase $2\alpha$. A symmetry-broken thermodynamic description selects a pair phase. This must be distinguished from electromagnetic gauge freedom: a local gauge transformation changes the phase and potentials together and is a redundancy of the description, not an observable symmetry that the material literally violates.

A conventional centrosymmetric s-wave superconductor usually has an even-parity orbital pair state and a spin singlet state, consistent with the antisymmetry of two fermions. Its ordinary zero-field equilibrium state preserves time reversal. The electromagnetic coupling makes phase dynamics and screening part of the Anderson-Higgs mechanism in a superconductor; the Meissner effect is a measurable consequence. The condensate phase description does not imply that electric charge is no longer conserved.

In an unconventional superconductor, the gap can transform nontrivially under the crystal point group or have other nonstandard pairing structure. A common example is d-wave superconductivity, with sign changes and possible nodes in the gap. This does not automatically imply an additional observable fourfold-rotation breaking: a rotation that reverses the gap's sign can be accompanied by a gauge phase change. A nematic superconducting state instead breaks an actual crystal rotation symmetry in its gauge-invariant responses.

A chiral combination such as $p_x+i{p}_y$ can break time reversal, while a spin-triplet order parameter can also distinguish spin directions when the applicable spin-rotation and spin-orbit constraints permit it. Helium-3 superfluidity illustrates paired-fermion order with richer spin and orbital structure. These possibilities must be tested rather than equated: unconventional pairing does not by itself mean spin-triplet pairing, time-reversal breaking, or nematicity. Gap angular dependence, phase-sensitive interference, spin response and spontaneous magnetic signatures probe different symmetry questions. The phase-sensitive test of d-wave pairing is more specific than inferring a gap sign merely from its magnitude.

For a neutral condensate with order parameter $\psi =\sqrt{n_s}{e}^{i\varphi }$, the superfluid velocity away from singularities is ${\mathbf{v}}_s=\hslash \nabla \varphi /m$. Single-valuedness around a closed contour gives $\oint \nabla \varphi \cdot d\mathbf{l}=2\pi n$, hence quantization of circulation:The mass is that of the condensed object: an atom for a bosonic atomic superfluid, or a pair for a paired-fermion condensate. A nonzero winding cannot be continuously removed while the order parameter remains nonzero throughout a spanning region. A vortex allows its phase to wind while its amplitude vanishes in a core.

For a charged condensate, minimal coupling gives $m{\mathbf{v}}_s+q\mathbf{A}=\hslash \nabla \varphi$. ThusUsing ${\mathbf{j}}_s=n_{s}q{\mathbf{v}}_s$ and ${\lambda }_L^2=m/({\mu }_0{n}_s{q}^2)$ gives the fluxoid and flux quantization in a superconductor relation $\Phi +{\mu }_0{\lambda }_L^2\oint {\mathbf{j}}_s\cdot d\mathbf{l}=nh/q$. The signs of oriented flux and winding depend on the signed pair charge; the magnitude of the elementary superconducting flux quantum is ${\Phi }_0=h/(2e)$. Flux alone is quantized when the current term is negligible on a contour deep in the bulk. A thin ring or a contour near a core can instead require the full fluxoid.

In a neutral superfluid, vortex flow carries kinetic energy and angular momentum. Rotation can favor vortices because equilibrium minimizes the rotating-frame quantity $E-\mathbf{\Omega }\cdot \mathbf{L}$. The core size is set by a coherence or healing scale. In a type-II superconductor, an Abrikosov vortex carries quantized magnetic flux and circulating supercurrent; its core scale is the coherence length and its magnetic screening scale is the penetration depth. Between the lower and upper critical fields, a vortex lattice can be favored. Flux pinning affects how that structure responds to current. Type-I bulk superconductors instead favor macroscopic normal/superconducting separation rather than the usual stable dilute Abrikosov-vortex regime.