Past exam of the zoology course of the University of Cambridge / 2025 / Paper zm6

An animal biological cell must generate a protrusion, couple that protrusion to its surroundings, move its body and cell nucleus, and release or rearrange contacts behind it. Cell polarity makes these events persistent in one direction. At cellular scales, inertia is usually negligible: active forces balance resistance continuously, rather than giving the cell momentum that carries it forward after propulsion stops. ATP consumption maintains the system away from thermodynamic equilibrium.

At the front, actin polymerization can push the cell membrane into a lamellipodium. Whether this produces advance depends on coupling to the environment: without a mechanical grip, the actin network can move backward instead. On a flat adhesive substrate, integrins bind the extracellular matrix and connect through focal adhesions to the cytoskeleton. Regulated engagement transmits traction, while rearward myosin contraction and adhesion turnover move the rest of the cell. Adhesions must resist slipping long enough to transmit force but release to avoid anchoring the rear indefinitely. Another protrusive mechanism is a membrane bleb: local separation of the cell membrane from the cell cortex, driven by intracellular pressure, expands the membrane before a new cortex assembles underneath it.

A two-dimensional culture surface offers a broad basal contact area and little geometrical obstruction above the cell. A three-dimensional environment adds pore size, fibre orientation, matrix stiffness, and resistance from surrounding cells. The same cells may switch between elongated, strongly adhesive migration and more rounded, weakly adhesive movement. Proteolysis can enlarge a path through the extracellular matrix, but a sufficiently permissive existing pore need not require digestion. The relatively stiff cell nucleus can become the main bottleneck; its passage depends on deformation, confinement and force transmission. Extensive squeezing can damage the nuclear envelope, so migration speed alone is not a sufficient measure of successful transit.

A decisive experiment removed all functional integrins from mouse leukocytes. Their interstitial migration in three-dimensional environments persisted, and myosin became particularly important for passage through narrow gaps. This distinguishes force generation from a particular adhesion mechanism: confinement and friction can provide useful coupling even without integrin anchoring.^[ref]

Thus “three-dimensional migration requires stronger adhesion” is not a general rule. A useful comparison holds ligand density, matrix stiffness and pore geometry as independently controlled as possible, measures whole-cell and nuclear movement, and perturbs actin, myosin, integrins and matrix digestion separately. Differences then identify which mechanical requirement has changed, rather than treating dimensionality as a single unexplained variable.

The hypothesis has two distinct components: the tissue changes its material response, and that change causally affects collective cell migration. A moving tissue may generate different stresses without becoming mechanically different. Conversely, a changed viscosity or yield stress need not generate directed movement without a driving force. The experiment should distinguish force production, material response and geometry.

First obtain a time-resolved three-dimensional map of the embryo using minimally perturbing live-cell imaging. Label nuclei and membranes, register tissue motion, and measure cell speeds, directional persistence, neighbour exchanges, strain rates and the timing of morphogenesis. Track cells relative to their neighbours as well as to the microscope: bulk translation alone does not show internal rearrangement. Compare equivalent developmental stages and anatomical regions, and quantify cell proliferation, death and differentiation so that changes in tissue composition are not mistaken for migration.

Next apply a calibrated mechanical perturbation. An embedded deformable droplet with known interfacial properties can report anisotropic stresses; magnetic actuation can impose a controlled deformation and reveal recovery, viscoelasticity and a possible yield stress. A controlled force step followed by relaxation probes different timescales. Laser ablation of a loaded junction provides a complementary recoil measurement, but recoil velocity depends on both pre-existing tension and dissipation: it is not an absolute tension measurement without a mechanical model. Probe different directions because tissue response may be anisotropic.

An informative precedent combined magnetically actuated droplets and cell tracking in the extending zebrafish body axis. Posterior tissue was more fluid-like than the more mature anterior region. Perturbations of N-cadherin and contractility helped connect adhesion and rearrangements to mechanical integrity and elongation.^[ref] This motivates a specific mechanism to test in the new embryo; it does not establish that all migrating tissues undergo the same transition.

For causality, change the proposed material property locally and acutely, before migration changes. For example, use optogenetics to alter contractility in a defined region, or a reversible adhesion perturbation, with unilluminated and light-only controls. Measure the material response again rather than assuming the manipulation made the tissue stiffer. Then test whether the spatial pattern and timescale of migration change as predicted. Restore the perturbed component or reverse the manipulation to seek rescue. Mosaic interventions help distinguish changes in migrating cells from changes in their surroundings, although altered signal transduction remains a potential confounder.

Finally fit a mechanical model to measured stresses, geometry and material parameters, then predict a held-out perturbation rather than merely fitting the original flow. Replicate across embryos, randomize treatment, analyse trajectories blind to treatment, and use the embryo as the independent biological replicate. Evidence is strongest when a measured material change precedes movement, targeted intervention changes both in the predicted way, and rescue restores both without simply restoring tissue viability.

External chemical signals can guide cell migration, but the statement is too strong if “determined” means that they uniquely specify whether, how fast and in which direction a cell moves. A chemoattractant gradient biases a cell's internal polarity machinery; it does not directly supply the mechanical work of locomotion. Chemotaxis is directional bias, whereas a change in speed or persistence without directional preference is chemokinesis.

A chemical response depends on receptor abundance, signalling adaptation and the cell's existing cell polarity. The same external field can therefore yield different trajectories in different cell states. Uniform stimulation can increase motility without providing a direction, and spontaneous fluctuations of the actin system can initiate movement without a spatial chemical instruction. Persistent migration combines feedback within the cell with a cue that biases that feedback.

Mechanical and geometrical inputs also matter. Durotaxis describes a bias associated with substrate stiffness, while haptotaxis follows spatial variation in adhesive ligands. Contact guidance by fibre alignment can channel motion even when soluble signals are uniform. Narrow spaces constrain the available paths and can force a switch of protrusive mechanism. These effects are not wholly separate from chemistry: cells sense mechanical forces through molecular interactions. Nevertheless, their directional information resides in mechanics or geometry, not necessarily in an imposed soluble concentration gradient.

Contacts between cells supply another source of organization. Experiments on neural crest cells showed that collisions can cause protrusion collapse and repolarization, and that perturbing noncanonical Wnt signalling disrupts this behaviour and group directionality.^[ref] Contact inhibition of locomotion therefore helps generate collective trajectories through local interactions, rather than each cell independently reading a complete external chemical map. Cohesion and other attractive interactions can prevent such repulsion from simply dispersing the group.

A discriminating experiment independently varies soluble gradient, adhesive pattern and mechanical confinement. Measure direction, speed and persistence separately; reverse the gradient, remove it, and then block the relevant receptor while checking viability and the ability to move. If a directional bias follows the reversed chemical field, that supports chemical guidance. If speed rises under uniform stimulation, that supports chemokinesis. If trajectories remain aligned with fibres after chemical reversal, physical guidance is influential. Manipulating intracellular polarity can test whether a cue is instructive or merely permissive.

The useful conclusion is that motion emerges from an internally powered, state-dependent cell interacting with chemical, mechanical and cellular surroundings. External chemical signals are often decisive inputs, but the trajectory is a property of the coupled system.

A good in-vitro model should distinguish cancer invasion, movement across a tissue boundary into surrounding material, from simple growth or movement across a flat surface. No single assay reproduces the entire sequence from a primary tumour to a distant metastasis. Choose the assay to answer a specified mechanistic question, then confirm the result in a model that retains additional biological constraints.

A scratch assay measures closure of a gap in a monolayer. It is inexpensive and permits live-cell imaging, but closure combines cell migration, spreading and cell proliferation, and the wound releases signals and damages cells. It does not by itself demonstrate invasion through a basement membrane. A porous-membrane assay can measure transit toward a stimulus; adding an extracellular barrier tests an additional requirement. Yet pore size, coating thickness, chemical gradients and the counting time can dominate the result, and endpoint cell counts hide whether treatment altered survival or actual migration.

Three-dimensional tumour spheroids or organoids embedded in a defined extracellular matrix allow individual and collective invasion to be followed over time. Quantify invasion distance, cell escape, strand architecture and leader-follower behaviour, alongside changes in spheroid size and viability. Use collagen-rich and basement-membrane-like environments to test whether a phenotype depends on matrix identity. Independently vary ligand presentation, matrix stiffness and pore dimensions where possible: increasing collagen concentration changes several of them simultaneously.

A primary study of breast tumour organoids identified invasive leader cells expressing a basal epithelial programme, including K14 and p63; reducing either component impaired collective invasion in that system. The experiment connected a defined cellular subpopulation to an invasion phenotype rather than assuming that every tumour cell was equivalent.^[ref] Its conclusion remains specific to the tested settings and does not make these markers universal requirements for invasion.

Add stromal cells, immune cells or a vessel-like boundary if the question concerns their interactions. Microfluidics can impose controlled gradients and permit live-cell imaging of entry into or exit from a channel. Include non-invasive and invasive controls, perturbation controls, rescue where feasible, and matched measurements of cell proliferation and death. Follow individual cells rather than relying solely on a final stained area. Patient-derived material should include multiple independent tumours: many fields from one culture are not independent patient replicates.

Limitations remain substantial. Culture selects cells that tolerate the medium; long-passaged lines may lose the original tumour's diversity. Matrices and added growth factors can have variable composition. Isolated cultures omit native immune surveillance, vascular perfusion, whole-organ architecture and systemic influences. Even elaborate organoids incompletely reproduce these features. Finally, invasion is only one stage: it does not establish survival in blood, colonization of a distant organ, or clinical response. Agreement across complementary assays strengthens a mechanism; no dish-based result alone proves a metastatic outcome in a person.

The robust starting point is a topological accounting problem. An archaeal host related to Asgard archaea and an Alphaproteobacteria-related partner must become a cell with an internal mitochondrion, a cell nucleus separated from the cytoplasm, and an interconnected endomembrane system. Their modern relatives are not unchanged ancestors. Several historical sequences can satisfy these endpoints, so the required transformations should be separated from one particular engulfment story.

The bacterial partner must become enclosed within the host's overall cellular boundary and maintained through host reproduction. Its descendants retain inner and outer mitochondrial membranes, requiring preservation or remodelling of ancestral bacterial envelope topology rather than fusion of every membrane into one. If entry used engulfment, host membrane extension, closure and a fission event would enclose the partner, and an additional host-derived surrounding membrane would have to be removed or incorporated into the evolving system. If protrusions grew around an external partner and fused, an alternative sequence could internalize it without a fully developed modern phagocytosis pathway. The modern mitochondrial envelope alone does not decide between these routes.

The host also needs a plasma membrane separating its final cytoplasm from the environment. Producing internal compartments requires membrane curvature, membrane growth and controlled membrane fusion or membrane fission. A purely continuous infolding of the surface has an extracellular-facing lumen; invagination changes geometry but does not allow a molecule to cross a lipid bilayer. Subsequent sealing and traffic can produce an internal lumen while preserving this orientation. This distinction is developed under topology of membrane compartments.

For the cell nucleus, two membranes surround the chromosome-containing compartment, with the outer nuclear envelope continuous with the endoplasmic reticulum. Openings through the envelope become selective nuclear pore complexes, while the chromosome compartment must communicate with the cytoplasm for transport without losing its identity. In an outside-in scenario, internal membranes expand around the chromosomes and fuse. In an inside-out scenario, protrusions from an ancestral chromosome-containing body expand and merge into a surrounding cytoplasm; the original boundary contributes to the nuclear boundary. The latter is an explicit alternative hypothesis, not an observed reconstruction of the event.^[ref]

Culturing an Asgard archaeon revealed extensive protrusions and close metabolic associations, motivating an entangle–engulf–endogenize proposal. The culture was not observed making a eukaryotic cell or engulfing a bacterium, and it lacked the developed internal organelles of a eukaryote.^[ref] The evidence establishes plausibility of some components, not the order of every ancestral membrane event.

The lipid divide adds a biochemical problem: typical archaeal membranes and typical bacterial/eukaryotic membranes differ in lipid linkage and glycerol stereochemistry. Replacement, coexistence or redistribution of lipid-synthesis pathways must be compatible with continuing membrane function; an abrupt wholesale replacement is not forced. Finally, membrane remodelling must be coupled to regulated protein targeting, metabolite exchange and division, so that the mitochondrion becomes an inherited endosymbiont and the new compartments persist. These requirements constrain any scenario even where the historical route remains uncertain.

Coat-associated adaptors couple three tasks: recognizing the correct membrane, selecting cargo, and assembling a carrier. Each interaction can be modest on its own; coincidence detection creates a selective assembly site. A sorting motif on a cargo's cytoplasmic tail can contact an adaptor directly, whereas soluble luminal cargo requires a transmembrane receptor to expose an adaptor-binding signal to the cytoplasm. Thus cargo recognition respects membrane orientation.

In clathrin-mediated endocytosis, the AP2 adaptor complex recognizes plasma-membrane determinants and cargo motifs while recruiting the clathrin scaffold. Other clathrin adaptors operate at internal membranes, so clathrin alone does not specify an itinerary. AP1 adaptor complex-associated carriers, for example, rely on a different local molecular context. Cargo, lipid and small-GTPase interactions collectively distinguish productive assembly from accidental coat binding.

COPII illustrates the same logic at endoplasmic reticulum exit sites. Membrane-associated Sar1 GTPase recruits the inner Sec23-Sec24 complex layer, in which Sec24 recognizes cargo and cargo receptors; Sec13-Sec31 complex builds an outer scaffold. COPI uses a different coat assembly, recruited by ARF-family GTPases, and participates in retrieval toward the endoplasmic reticulum and traffic within the Golgi apparatus. These systems need not have identical subunits to share the architecture of membrane recruitment, cargo selection and scaffold assembly.

An especially useful mechanistic test is biochemical reconstitution. Purified COPII coat components and defined liposomes were sufficient to produce coated vesicles, demonstrating that assembly itself can deform membranes rather than merely decorate carriers made by a wholly independent mechanism.^[ref] Sufficiency in this minimal system does not imply that every regulator and cargo in a living cell is dispensable.

Coat polymerization, membrane-inserting regions and accessory factors contribute to curvature, while fission machinery and details of neck geometry differ among pathways. The nucleotide cycles of Sar1 GTPase and ARF-family GTPases regulate coat recruitment and turnover; they should not be portrayed as identical engines executing every membrane-cutting step. After budding, substantial uncoating permits subsequent targeting and fusion. Destination specificity then depends on additional factors, including tethering machinery, Rab-family GTPases and SNAREs; a coat is not a complete postal address by itself.

To test the common design, mutate a cargo motif, its adaptor-binding site and the membrane-recruitment determinant separately. Measure recruitment, cargo concentration and productive transport as separate outputs, and rescue with the corresponding wild-type component. A cargo-selective defect without complete loss of carrier formation is particularly informative because it separates selection from the physical formation of a carrier.

Ubiquitin is a central regulator of selective protein turnover, but “the most important” has no universal meaning without specifying substrate, cell state and the quantity being measured. Selective destruction of a short-lived regulator, bulk recycling during starvation, and removal of a damaged mitochondrion are different problems. The ubiquitin system is extensive, yet it neither encompasses every degradation pathway nor makes all ubiquitination a destruction signal.

In the canonical pathway, an E1 enzyme uses ATP to activate ubiquitin, an E2 enzyme carries it, and an E3 ligase supplies much of the substrate specificity. Repeated conjugation can build chains on a substrate, while deubiquitinating enzymes edit or remove those modifications. Linkage and chain architecture influence recognition; a K48-linked chain is a common proteasomal signal, but “polyubiquitinated” does not specify a single outcome. Some ubiquitinations regulate location or signalling instead of degradation.

The proteasome recognizes suitable substrates, removes or recycles ubiquitin, unfolds accessible protein regions using ATP-dependent machinery, and threads the polypeptide into a proteolytic core. Substrate tagging is therefore one control point among several: accessibility, engagement and unfolding matter as well. This permits rapid removal of regulatory proteins and disposal of misfolded soluble proteins without digesting an entire organelle.

A particularly clear exception is ornithine decarboxylase. In a cell-free system, proteasome depletion blocked its ATP- and antizyme-dependent degradation; purified 26S proteasomes supported degradation without ubiquitin. This provides direct biochemical evidence that proteasomal destruction need not always require substrate ubiquitination.^[ref] It is a specific exception rather than evidence that ubiquitin is generally dispensable.

Lysosomes provide another major route. Autophagy can sequester cytoplasm, aggregates and organelles in membrane carriers for lysosomal degradation. Some selective autophagy receptors recognize ubiquitinated cargo, so this route is partly coordinated with ubiquitin; bulk starvation-induced autophagy and other cargo-recruitment mechanisms show why it is not equivalent to proteasomal tagging. A yeast genetic screen used failure to accumulate autophagic bodies and failure of starvation-induced vacuolar protein turnover to identify autophagy-defective mutants. The experiment established a genetically separable membrane-delivery programme essential to this recycling response.^[ref]

Membrane proteins can also be delivered through endocytosis and endosomal sorting, including ESCRT-dependent entry into internal vesicles before lysosomal destruction. Here ubiquitin often helps specify sorting, while receptor internalization, membrane traffic and lysosomal activity supply additional control points. Dedicated organellar proteases add further pathways.

Experimentally, compare proteasome inhibition, lysosomal inhibition and perturbation of a defined E3 ligase or autophagy factor while following a labelled substrate over time. A steady-state increase is insufficient: it can result from increased synthesis rather than reduced degradation. Measure turnover and pathway flux, check inhibitor toxicity and use genetic rescue. The defensible conclusion is that ubiquitin is a major, versatile selectivity signal whose importance is context-dependent; complete protein clearance depends on several regulated degradation systems.