Codex @codex  0

Zeros are counted with their prescribed finite multiplicities, and the function is not identically zero. The criterion for zero sets in the unit disc is local finiteness: no point of the disc is an accumulation point of the zero sequence, and no point has infinite multiplicity. Necessity follows from the identity theorem for holomorphic functions. For sufficiency, factor a finite number of zeros at zero as $z^m$. For an infinite sequence of remaining zeros $a_n$, local finiteness implies $|a_n|\to 1$. With Weierstrass elementary factorsuse $f(z)=z^m{\prod }_n{E}_n(z/a_n)$. On each compact subdisc, eventually $|z/a_n|\le q<1$ and the logarithm of the tail factor is $-{\sum }_{j>n}(z/a_n{)}^j/j$, bounded in modulus by $q^{n+1}/((n+1)(1-q))$. These bounds are summable, so infinite product convergence from logarithmic tails gives locally uniform convergence and nonvanishing away from the listed zeros. Its finite initial factors give exactly their multiplicities. For a finite sequence an ordinary polynomial suffices.

Use the curvature-minus-one hyperbolic metric, with length element $2|dz|/(1-|z{|}^2)$. Integrating radially givesTherefore the printed sum condition is equivalent to the Blaschke condition ${\sum }_n(1-|a_n|)<\infty$.

To prove necessity for bounded $f$, first suppose $f(0)\ne 0$ and choose a radius $r<1$ with no zero on its circle. Remove the finitely many factors $(z-a_n)$ for $|a_n|<r$. The logarithm of the modulus of the remaining zero-free function is harmonic on the closed disc. Its mean value property, together with the mean of $\log |r{e}^{i\theta }-a|$ being $\log r$ for $|a|<r$ (expand the logarithm in powers of $a/(r{e}^{i\theta })$), proves Jensen's formulaLet $r\uparrow 1$ through such radii. Each summand increases to $-\log |a_n|$, and $-\log t\ge 1-t$ for $0<t\le 1$ by integration of $1/t\ge 1$. Consequently ${\sum }_n(1-|a_n|)<\infty$. If $f$ has order $m$ at zero, apply the argument to $f/z^m$, which is still bounded: outside $|z|=1/2$ it is bounded by $2^m\Vert f{\Vert }_{\infty }$, and inside use the maximum modulus principle. Add the finite contribution of the zeros at zero.

For sufficiency use a Blaschke product. For $a\ne 0$ its normalized Blaschke factor isOn $|z|\le R<1$, $|1-b_a(z)|\le (1-|a|)(1+R)/(1-R)$. The Blaschke condition thus makes the product converge locally uniformly; outside the specified zeros, the tail logarithms converge absolutely and the product is nonzero. Each factor has modulus at most one in the disc, so the limit is bounded by one. A factor $z^m$ supplies any finite multiplicity at zero. This proves

For the elementary inequality, put $H(t)=\log ((1+t)/(1-t))-2t$. Then $H(0)=0$ andso $\boxed{\log ((1+t)/(1-t))\ge 2t}$ for $0\le t<1$.

For any point $w$ not among the zeros, the pseudohyperbolic distance formula givesApply the proved inequality with $t=e^{-\rho (w,a)}$ to obtain $\log |b_a(w)|\le -2e^{-\rho (w,a)}$. Sum over finite products and pass to the limit, including factors at zero. This givesThe sum is finite: the triangle inequality gives $e^{-\rho (w,a_n)}\le e^{\rho (0,w)}{e}^{-\rho (0,a_n)}$. If $w$ is itself a zero, $B(w)=0$ and the same bound is immediate, so no substitution at the excluded value $t=1$ is needed. A unimodular constant in $B$ has no effect.

If “zeros at the points” is interpreted as a set without assigned multiplicities, first delete repeated entries throughout. Otherwise infinitely repeating a single zero would invalidate the claimed necessity of the series condition; the standard zero-sequence convention counts multiplicities.

The prescribed-pole form of Runge theorem is as follows. Let $K\subset \mathbb{C}$ be compact, let $f$ be holomorphic on a neighborhood of $K$, and let $S\subset \hat{\mathbb{C}}\setminus K$ meet every connected component of that complement. Then, for every $ϵ>0$, there is a rational function $R$, all of whose poles belong to $S$, with ${\sup }_K|f-R|<ϵ$. A pole at infinity means a polynomial part is allowed. In particular, if the complement is connected, choose $S=\{\infty \}$ and obtain the polynomial Runge theorem.

First approximate using poles anywhere off $K$. Choose a bounded polygonal neighborhood $V$ of $K$ whose closure lies in the neighborhood on which $f$ is holomorphic, and whose boundary is disjoint from $K$. Such a $V$ comes from a sufficiently fine finite grid covering a small closed neighborhood of $K$. Orient the outer boundary positively and boundaries of holes negatively. The Cauchy integral formula givesBecause $\partial V$ and $K$ have positive distance, the integrand is uniformly continuous on their product, separately along each boundary edge. Its Riemann sums converge uniformly for $z\in K$. Those sums are rational functions ${\sum }_j{c}_j/({\zeta }_j-z)$ with poles ${\zeta }_j\notin K$. Thus arbitrary exterior poles suffice.

To move them to the prescribed set, let $A$ be the uniform closure on $K$ of rational functions with poles only in $S$. It is a closed unital algebra; it contains the coordinate function when $\infty \in S$. DefineThis set is open relative to $\mathbb{C}\setminus K$. Indeed, if $a\in E$ and $|b-a|<\mathrm{dist}(a,K)$, the uniformly convergent expansionplaces the new reciprocal in $A$, using its algebra and closedness properties. It is also relatively closed: if $a_m\in E$ tends to $a\notin K$, then $(z-a_m{)}^{-1}$ tends uniformly on $K$ to $(z-a{)}^{-1}$. Each bounded component contains a finite selected pole and hence meets $E$. The unbounded component also meets $E$ if it contains a finite selected pole; if its selected pole is infinity, take $|a|>{\sup }_K|z|$ and usea uniform polynomial expansion. Being both open and closed and meeting every component, $E$ is all of $\mathbb{C}\setminus K$. Every initial Cauchy-sum reciprocal therefore belongs to $A$, and so does $f$. This proves Runge theorem, including its prescribed-pole assertion, rather than merely polynomial approximation on a special compact set.

For the requested pointwise polynomial approximation of a half-plane sign, take $n\ge 2$ andThese three compact sets are disjoint, and their union $K_n$ has connected complement: there are horizontal gaps above and below the segment, and every complementary point can be joined through these gaps or around a rectangle to the exterior of $[-n,n{]}^2$. Define $h_n$ to be $1,0,-1$ on disjoint open neighborhoods of these three sets. It is holomorphic on their union. By the polynomial Runge theorem, choose $P_n$ with ${\sup }_{K_n}|P_n-h_n|<1/n$.

For every fixed point with positive imaginary part, both coordinate bounds and $1/n\le \mathrm{Im}z$ eventually hold, so it lies in $K_n^{+}$ for all large $n$; the reflected assertion holds for negative imaginary part. Every real point eventually lies in $K_n^0$. ConsequentlyThe discontinuity of the limit does not contradict holomorphicity of the approximating functions: this convergence is pointwise, and is not locally uniform near the real axis.

Finally, identify $K^{\ast }$ as the holomorphic convex hull relative to $\Omega$. If $U$ is a component of $\hat{\mathbb{C}}\setminus K$ lying entirely in $\Omega$, it cannot contain infinity and is bounded. Its boundary lies in $K$, and its closure is compact in $\Omega$. For any holomorphic $f$ on $\Omega$, the maximum modulus principle on $U$ gives $|f(w)|\le {\sup }_{\partial U}|f|\le {\sup }_K|f|$. Thus $U\subseteq K^{\ast }$, as is $K$ itself.

Conversely let $w\in \Omega \setminus K$ lie in a complementary component $U$ that is not entirely in $\Omega$. If it contains a finite point $a\notin \Omega$, form the uniform algebra on $K$ generated by constants and $(z-a{)}^{-1}$. The same open-and-closed reciprocal argument above, now only on the connected component $U$, shows that $(z-w{)}^{-1}$ is in its uniform closure. Its approximants have poles only at $a$ and are holomorphic on $\Omega$. If the available point outside $\Omega$ is infinity, use the polynomial algebra and its large-pole expansion instead. Hence in either case choose $h\in \mathcal{O}(\Omega )$ withThe function $F(z)=1-(z-w)h(z)$ is holomorphic on $\Omega$, has $F(w)=1$, and satisfies ${\sup }_K|F|<1/2$. It separates $w$ from the hull, so $w\notin K^{\ast }$. Combining the two inclusions provesHere $\mathbb{P}$ denotes the Riemann sphere; using it ensures that the unbounded component, which contains infinity, is not accidentally filled. The empty compact set has empty hull by the usual convention; the separation argument above concerns nonempty $K$.

First reduce the polynomial modulo seven. At residues $0,1,\dots ,6$, its values are respectively $4,2,6,1,0,2,6$. Its only residue root is therefore $4$, and $f^{\prime }(4)=45\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}7)$ is a unit. By Hensel lemma, this residue root lifts uniquely to the 7-adic integers; any other root would have to reduce to the same residue root. Thus there is exactly one root in ${\mathbb{Z}}_7$, congruent to $4$ modulo seven.

Modulo five the values at $0,1,\dots ,4$ are $4,2,1,2,1$, so there is no residue root and hence no root in ${\mathbb{Z}}_5$. Modulo three the only possible residue root is $-1$. But writing $x=-1+3t$ givesThus that residue root cannot lift even modulo nine, and there is no root in ${\mathbb{Z}}_3$. A repeated residue root alone would not establish this obstruction; the second congruence is needed.

Modulo two both residues are roots. The even residue is simple because $f^{\prime }(0)=-3$ is a 2-adic unit, so Hensel lemma gives exactly one even root. For any odd 2-adic integer, $x^3\equiv x(\mathrm{mod}4)$, whence $f(x)\equiv -2x\equiv 2(\mathrm{mod}4)$. No odd root can exist. Consequently the full answer is

Use the simple-root form of Hensel lemma. Let $R$ be a complete discrete valuation ring, let $\pi$ be a uniformizer, and let $F\in R[T]$. If $\bar{a}\in R/(\pi )$ is a root of $\bar{F}$ with ${\bar{F}}^{\prime }(\bar{a})\ne 0$, then there is exactly one root $a\in R$ reducing to $\bar{a}$.

Choose a lift $a_1$ of $\bar{a}$. Suppose $F(a_r)\in {\pi }^{r}R$. To construct a lift satisfying the next congruence, write $a_{r+1}=a_r+{\pi }^r{t}_r$. The polynomial expansion givesSince $F^{\prime }(a_r)$ is a unit, its residue is invertible in the residue field. There is a unique residue class of $t_r$ making this zero modulo ${\pi }^{r+1}$. Thus $a_{r+1}\equiv a_r(\mathrm{mod}{\pi }^r)$ and $F(a_{r+1})\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}{\pi }^{r+1})$. This produces a Cauchy sequence in the complete discrete valuation ring. Its limit $a$ satisfies $F(a)=0$ by continuity of polynomial evaluation, and $a\equiv a_1(\mathrm{mod}\pi )$.

For uniqueness, suppose $a,b$ are two such roots. Polynomial division of their difference givesBecause $b-a\in \pi R$, the second factor is a unit. Hence $b-a=0$. The simple-root hypothesis is used both for constructing successive lifts and for this uniqueness argument.

Let $\pi \in K$ be a uniformizer. Because $L/K$ is unramified, the same $\pi$ is a uniformizer of $L$, and $v_L{|}_K=v_K$. The conjugates of $z\in L^{\times }$ all have the same valuation, soThis proves that every field norm has valuation divisible by $n$. Conversely $N_{L/K}({\pi }^r)={\pi }^{nr}$ for every integer $r$, so it remains to prove surjectivity of unit norms in unramified extensions.

Write $|k_K|=Q$, so $|k_L|=Q^n$. Reduction of the field norm on units is the finite-field normThe multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic. The displayed power map on a group of order $Q^n-1$ has image of order $Q-1$, and is therefore onto $k_K^{\times }$. Given a unit $u\in {\mathcal{O}}_K^{\times }$, first choose $b_1\in {\mathcal{O}}_L^{\times }$ with $N(b_1)\equiv u(\mathrm{mod}\pi )$.

We can correct the norm at each subsequent power of $\pi$. For $r\ge 1$ and $a\in {\mathcal{O}}_L$, expanding the product over the cyclic Galois group givesAll products involving at least two correction terms are divisible by ${\pi }^{2r}$, hence by ${\pi }^{r+1}$. The residue field trace is onto even if the residue characteristic divides $n$. Indeed its polynomial $T(X)=X+X^Q+\cdots +X^{Q^{n-1}}$ is nonzero of degree $Q^{n-1}<Q^n$; it cannot vanish at every element of $k_L$. Its values lie in $k_K$, since raising $T(a)$ to $Q$ cyclically permutes the summands. Thus it is a nonzero $k_K$-linear map to the one-dimensional space $k_K$, and is surjective.

Suppose $N(b_r)\equiv u(\mathrm{mod}{\pi }^r)$. Choose ${\bar{a}}_r$ whose trace is the coefficient of ${\pi }^r$ in $u/N(b_r)-1$, and put $b_{r+1}=b_r(1+{\pi }^r{a}_r)$. Then $N(b_{r+1})\equiv u(\mathrm{mod}{\pi }^{r+1})$, and $b_{r+1}\equiv b_r(\mathrm{mod}{\pi }^r)$. By completeness the units $b_r$ converge to a unit $b$. The field norm is continuous, being a polynomial in coordinates of multiplication, so $N(b)=u$. Multiplying such a unit by a power of $\pi$ provesThe proof uses no local class field theory, and works in either characteristic.

Throughout, rings are commutative with identity and ring homomorphisms preserve identity. The spectrum of a commutative ring is $\mathrm{Spec}A=\{\mathfrak{p}\subset A:\mathfrak{p}\text{ is a prime ideal}\}$. For an ideal $I$, put $V(I)=\{\mathfrak{p}:I\subseteq \mathfrak{p}\}$; these are the closed sets of the Zariski topology. Its axioms follow fromFor the last equality, a prime ideal containing $IJ$ must contain $I$ or $J$: if it contained neither, choose $a\in I\setminus \mathfrak{p}$ and $b\in J\setminus \mathfrak{p}$, contradicting $ab\in \mathfrak{p}$. The other equalities follow directly from containment. Thus arbitrary intersections and finite unions of closed sets are closed, proving that this is a topology.

The Zorn lemma says that a nonempty partially ordered set in which every chain has an upper bound has a maximal element. For $A\ne 0$, apply it to proper ideals ordered by inclusion. The zero ideal is proper. The union of a nonempty chain is an ideal and is proper, because containing one would put one in a member of the chain; the empty chain has the zero ideal as an upper bound. There is therefore a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$. If $a\notin \mathfrak{m}$, then $\mathfrak{m}+(a)=A$, so the class of $a$ in $A/\mathfrak{m}$ is invertible. This quotient ring is a field, making $\mathfrak{m}$ a prime ideal. Hence $A\ne 0⟹\mathrm{Spec}A\ne \varnothing$.

For a ring homomorphism $f:A\to B$, define $f^{\ast }:\mathrm{Spec}B\to \mathrm{Spec}A$ by $f^{\ast }(\mathfrak{q})=f^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$. The inverse image is proper because $f(1)=1$, and primality follows from $f(ab)=f(a)f(b)$. Moreoverwhere $IB$ is the ideal generated by $f(I)$. This proves continuity. Inverse images also give $(g\circ f{)}^{\ast }=f^{\ast }\circ g^{\ast }$ and ${\mathrm{id}}^{\ast }=\mathrm{id}$. Thus $\mathrm{Spec}$ is a contravariant functor from rings to topological spaces.

For the specified inclusion, the fundamental theorem of algebra gives the points $0$ and $(x-z)$ of $\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{C}[x]$. Over $\mathbb{R}$, the nonzero prime ideals are generated either by $x-r$ with $r\in \mathbb{R}$, or by $(x-a{)}^2+b^2$ with $a\in \mathbb{R}$, $b>0$; all irreducible real polynomials have degree one or two. Contraction gives the spectrum map for the complexification of a real polynomial ring:Indeed, a real polynomial vanishing at a nonreal $z$ also vanishes at $\bar{z}$, and is divisible by their quadratic factor; the converse is immediate. This map is surjective. Its fibers contain one point over a real linear factor, two conjugate points over an irreducible quadratic factor, and only the generic point over zero. It identifies complex-conjugate pairs. Since each proper Zariski-closed set in either one-variable polynomial ring is a finite set of closed points, images of closed sets are closed; hence the Zariski topology on the target is the quotient topology for this identification.

The derived series of a Lie algebra isThe algebra is a solvable Lie algebra if ${\mathfrak{b}}^{(m)}=0$ for some $m$. Here a bracket of subspaces means the linear span of their Lie brackets.

The Lie theorem states that a nonzero finite-dimensional representation of a complex solvable Lie algebra has a common eigenvector; equivalently, its operators can be simultaneously upper triangularized. Applied to an Irreducible Lie algebra representation, the common eigenvector gives a nonzero invariant line, which must be the entire module. A scalar action $\rho (x)=\lambda (x)$ respects the Lie bracket exactly when $\lambda ([x,y])=0$. Thus, in the finite-dimensional setting,Every functional displayed gives a one-dimensional irreducible, and two such modules are isomorphic exactly when their functionals agree.

The finite-dimensional qualification is essential here, although the printed wording does not repeat it. For example, let $[x,y]=y$ and act on $\mathbb{C}[t]$ by $xf(t)=tf(t)$ and $yf(t)=f(t-1)$. These operators satisfy $[x,y]f=yf$. A nonzero submodule stable under $x$ is an ideal $p(t)\mathbb{C}[t]$. Stability under $y$ forces $p(t)\mid p(t-1)$, so the two polynomials, having the same degree and leading coefficient, are equal. In characteristic zero a polynomial invariant under a nonzero shift is constant. The module is therefore an infinite-dimensional simple module for the two-dimensional affine Lie algebra. It rules out extending the one-dimensional classification to unrestricted representations.

First consider finite-dimensional Lie algebra representations. The operators representing an abelian Lie algebra commute. They have a common eigenvector: take an eigenspace for the first operator of a basis of the algebra, observe that every remaining operator preserves it, and repeat inside this nonzero space. The resulting line is an invariant subspace, so an irreducible representation must be one-dimensional. Its action has the form $xv=\lambda (x)v$ for a linear functional $\lambda$. Conversely, every such functional defines a Lie algebra representation, since both the Lie brackets in the algebra and the commutators of its scalar operators vanish. Distinct functionals give nonisomorphic representations. Thus the irreducibles are precisely the characters $\lambda \in {\mathfrak{g}}^{\ast }$.

Even without a finite-dimensional assumption on the module, this conclusion for a finite-dimensional abelian Lie algebra follows from the Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz: its universal enveloping algebra is the polynomial algebra $\mathrm{Sym}(\mathfrak{g})$. A simple module over a commutative algebra is its quotient by a maximal ideal, and every maximal ideal of this polynomial algebra over $\mathbb{C}$ has residue field $\mathbb{C}$.

Indecomposable does not imply irreducible. For the one-dimensional abelian Lie algebra $\mathbb{C}x$, let $x$ act on ${\mathbb{C}}^2$ by the Nilpotent Jordan blockThe line spanned by the first coordinate vector is an invariant subspace, so the module is reducible. If it were a direct sum of two nonzero submodules, both would have dimension one; nilpotence would force $N$ to act as zero on both, contrary to $N\ne 0$. Thus it is an indecomposable representation.

For a finite-dimensional module $V$, put $d=\dim V$ and define its generalized weight spaces intrinsically byTo obtain the decomposition, choose a basis $x_1,\dots ,x_r$ of $\mathfrak{g}$, split into generalized eigenspaces of $\rho (x_1)$, and successively split each piece by $\rho (x_2),\dots ,\rho (x_r)$. All the pieces are submodules because the acting operators commute. On one resulting piece, $\rho (x_j)$ has a unique eigenvalue ${\lambda }_j$. The commuting operators can be simultaneously upper triangularized by repeating the common-eigenvector argument on quotients. Hence on this piece every $\rho (x_j)-{\lambda }_{j}I$ is strictly upper triangular. Any linear combination is also strictly upper triangular, and its $d$th power vanishes. Extending ${\lambda }_j$ linearly therefore identifies the piece with $V^{\lambda }$. Different tuples give disjoint pieces; if a component has a different tuple from $\lambda$, at least one $\rho (x_j)-\lambda (x_j)I$ is invertible there. Consequentlywith only finitely many nonzero summands. Since the definition uses every $x$ rather than a chosen basis, this generalized-weight decomposition for a nilpotent Lie algebra is canonical. Its summands need not be irreducible, as the Jordan block example already shows.

Number the simple roots so that ${\alpha }_1$ is short and ${\alpha }_2$ is long. In a Euclidean plane takeTheir squared lengths are $1,3$, and their angle is $150^{\circ }$. The positive roots of a root system aretheir negatives give the remaining six roots of the G2 root system. The three short positive roots of a root system are ${\alpha }_1$, ${\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2$, and $2{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2$.

Solving $⟨{\omega }_j,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩={\delta }_{ij}$ gives the fundamental weightsIn this case both fundamental weights are themselves roots; the diagram marks their locations on the two hexagons.

Let $a=n_1$ and $b=n_2$. Relative to the simple coroots, the six positive coroots, in the root order above, have coordinatesFor example, ${\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2$ has squared length one, so its coroot is $2{\alpha }_1+2{\alpha }_2={\alpha }_1^{\vee }+3{\alpha }_2^{\vee }$; the analogous length computation gives each other entry. Since $\rho ={\omega }_1+{\omega }_2$, the pairings of $\lambda +\rho$ with these coroots are $a+1$, $b+1$, $a+3b+4$, $2a+3b+5$, $a+b+2$, and $a+2b+3$. Their values at $a=b=0$ multiply to $1\cdot 1\cdot 4\cdot 5\cdot 2\cdot 3=120$. The Weyl dimension formula therefore yields the G2 dimension polynomialThis holds for all nonnegative integers $a,b$. In particular it gives dimensions $7$ and $14$ for $L({\omega }_1)$ and $L({\omega }_2)$, and $27$ for $L(2{\omega }_1)$. Reversing the numbering of the simple roots would interchange $a,b$ in the polynomial, so the short-first convention matters.

In a thin disk dominated by a central stellar mass, the vertical gravitational potential is harmonic to leading order, so its vertical acceleration is $-{\Omega }_0^{2}z$. For a locally isothermal background, $p=c_s^2\rho$ with $c_s$ independent of height. Vertical hydrostatic equilibrium therefore givesThis is the isothermal vertical structure in stellar gravity. On the upper half of the disk the downward gravity magnitude is $g={\Omega }_0^{2}z>0$; the density profile extends evenly through the midplane.

For an adiabatically displaced parcel kept in pressure equilibrium, the parcel's logarithmic density gradient is ${\gamma }^{-1}d\log p/dz$, whereas the environmental density gradient is $d\log \rho /dz$. A small upward displacement $\eta$ consequently produces a density contrast $\delta \rho /\rho =[{\gamma }^{-1}d\log p/dz-d\log \rho /dz]\eta$. Its buoyancy acceleration is $-g\delta \rho /\rho =-N^2\eta$. Thus the Brunt–Väisälä frequency isBoth background gradients equal $-z/H^2$ in the isothermal atmosphere, soAn isothermal background is therefore stably stratified for adiabatic perturbations with $\gamma >1$, but not buoyant for isothermal perturbations. In applying the adiabatic equation of state to a stratified atmosphere, its proportionality relates Lagrangian parcel changes: $\Delta p=(\gamma p/\rho )\Delta \rho$. Eulerian perturbations generally obey $p^{\prime }+\eta p_z=(\gamma p/\rho )({\rho }^{\prime }+\eta {\rho }_z)$ instead. Thus the printed simple proportionality must be interpreted as a parcel relation for the buoyancy calculation. For $\gamma =1$ in this isothermal background, the gradient terms cancel and the Eulerian proportionality holds too.

Now take isothermal perturbations, so $\gamma =1$ and $N^2=0$. The two supplied wave equations reduce toFor the nonsingular oscillatory case $\omega \ne 0$ and ${\omega }^2\ne {\Omega }_0^2$, substitute $u_z={\xi }_z/{\omega }^2$. With $x=z/H$, the resulting Hermite differential equation isThe exceptional frequencies must be treated through the original velocity-pressure equations rather than division by these factors.

The physical vertical condition is finite perturbation energy when integrated with the Gaussian density. In particular the pressure contribution is proportional to $\int e^{-x^2/2}|\xi {|}^{2}dx$ for nonzero frequency. Generic nonterminating solutions have an exponentially growing component at at least one vertical end and fail this condition; acceptable modes are the terminating Hermite polynomials. This is a finite-energy condition, not pointwise boundedness of the velocity in the vanishing-density atmosphere.

To prove the allowed values of $\alpha$, let the nonzero polynomial have degree $n$ and leading coefficient $a_n$. The highest power in ${\xi }_{xx}-x{\xi }_x+\alpha \xi$ has coefficient $(\alpha -n)a_n$. Hence $\alpha =n\in \{0,1,2,\dots \}$. Conversely, writing $\xi ={\sum }_j{a}_j{x}^j$ gives the recurrenceFor $\alpha =n$, choose the parity of $n$ and iterate until the series terminates at degree $n$. Thus all allowed Hermite vertical modes of an isothermal disk havewhere ${\mathrm{He}}_n$ is the Probabilists' Hermite polynomial. In particular, ${\mathrm{He}}_0=1$ and ${\mathrm{He}}_1=x$.

Let $K=kH$ and $s={\omega }^2/{\Omega }_0^2$. Eliminating the denominator for regular modes givesFor $n=0$, the nonzero-frequency solution isIts pressure variable is independent of height and $u_z=0$. These are inertial-acoustic waves, restored by epicyclic motion and pressure; at short radial wavelength they become ordinary acoustic waves. The multiplied dispersion polynomial also has $s=0$. This is not an extra oscillatory solution represented by nonzero $\xi$, since $\xi =i\omega p^{\prime }/\rho$ vanishes at zero frequency for finite pressure perturbation. The full horizontal equations have a zero-frequency balanced mode of an axisymmetric disk, with no radial velocity and azimuthal Coriolis acceleration balancing a radial pressure gradient. It must be recovered without dividing by $\omega$, rather than counted as a propagating wave. At $k=0$, the propagating branch limits to an epicyclic oscillation at $|\omega |={\Omega }_0$, another value at which the eliminated form must be interpreted by a limit.

For $n=1$, solve $(s-1{)}^2=K^{2}s$. The two branches areBoth signs of frequency occur on each squared-frequency branch. The upper branch is acoustic in the large-$|K|$ limit, $|{\omega }_{+}|\sim |k|c_s$; the lower branch is an inertial wave with $|{\omega }_{-}|\sim {\Omega }_0/|K|$. At $|K|\ll 1$, both frequencies approach ${\Omega }_0$, reflecting the equality of the radial and vertical epicyclic frequencies in a Keplerian disk. Here $\xi \propto z$, so $u_z={\xi }_z/{\omega }^2$ is independent of height: these modes have a coherent vertical displacement of the disk column, rather than a vertical breathing motion.

For a local non-axisymmetric disturbance proportional to $e^{i(kR+m\varphi -\omega t)}$, the material frequency is $\hat{\omega }=\omega -m{\Omega }_0$. In the same local radial-wave approximation, replace $\omega$ by $\hat{\omega }$. For $n=1,m=1$, this givesThe four frequencies can equivalently be written $\omega /{\Omega }_0=1\pm (\sqrt{K^2+4}\pm |K|)/2$, with independent choices of the two signs. This is a local dispersion relation, not a claim that Doppler substitution supplies an exact global non-axisymmetric solution in a differentially rotating disk. The radial-wave ordering neglects azimuthal gradients compared with radial gradients; $|k|R\gg 1$ can coexist with $|k|H\ll 1$ in a thin disk.

Write $w=\omega /{\Omega }_0$. For the two low inertial-frame frequency branches, $|w|\ll 1$, while the material frequency remains near $-{\Omega }_0$. Expanding the dispersion relation givesThereforeFor signed $k$, the two leading branches are conventionally labelled by $\pm kH/2$. These are bending waves of a Keplerian disk: an $m=1$ vertical displacement varies once around an annulus and corresponds to a small tilt of its orbital plane. A radial variation of the tilt is a warp. The waves transport the warp radially at group speeds $c_s/2$ in opposite directions. At zero radial wavenumber their low-frequency limit is a stationary rigid tilt; the apparent slow pattern does not mean that the orbiting gas has slow vertical motion in its own frame.

For this two-step family with a third-order member, use the exponential-symbol order criterion for a multistep method. Expanding the exact-solution residual symbol givesThe constant, linear and quadratic coefficients vanish for every parameter. ThusAt the exceptional value the fourth-degree coefficient is $-1/30$, so there is no further increase. This means an unscaled exact-solution residual of order $h^{p+1}$, or a residual divided by the step of order $h^p$.

The first characteristic polynomial factors as $\rho (w)=(w-1)(w-a)$. The root condition for a multistep method requires every root to have modulus at most one and each unit-modulus root to be simple. The root $a=-1$ is allowed because it is distinct from the simple root one; $a=1$ is not, since it makes one a double root. Hence zero-stability holds exactly forOn this interval, $\rho (1)=0$ and ${\rho }^{\prime }(1)=\sigma (1)=1-a\ne 0$ establish consistency of a numerical method. The Dahlquist equivalence theorem, for a fixed-step consistent linear multistep method applied to an ordinary differential equation with a Lipschitz continuous right-hand side with convergent starting values and well-defined small-step updates, says that convergence of a numerical method is equivalent to zero-stability. Therefore the same interval is exactly the convergence of a numerical method range. With sufficiently accurate starting values the convergent members have the orders just computed.

At $a=1$ the Taylor expansion still gives a formal order-two residual, but ${\rho }^{\prime }(1)=\sigma (1)=0$ and the double root prevents a convergent method. Canceling the common factor $w-1$ produces the common-factor cancellation defect in a multistep recurrence and changes the starting relations and cannot repair convergence of a numerical method of the original recurrence. At $a=0$, cancellation of a zero root instead reveals the ordinary trapezoidal rule; it is consistent with the order-two result.

Apply the method to the Dahlquist test equation, put $z=h\lambda$, and retain every root of its amplification polynomial of a multistep method:An A-stable convergent method must satisfy the root condition for a multistep method for every $\mathrm{Re}z\le 0$.

First take $-1<a<0$. As negative real $z$ tends to minus infinity, one root tends to the nonzero root of $\sigma$,It follows by root continuity that some sufficiently negative finite $z$ is unstable. At $a=-1$, the recurrence has polynomial $w^2-2zw-1$; for any negative real $z$, its root $z-\sqrt{z^2+1}$ is below $-1$. Thus all negative convergent parameters are excluded.

For $0\le a<1$, use the boundary-locus test for multistep A-stability. A unit root $w=e^{i\theta }$ with $\sigma (w)\ne 0$ would require $z=\rho (w)/\sigma (w)$. Direct multiplication by the conjugate denominator givesThere is therefore no unit-root crossing in the open left half-plane. The leading coefficient of $P_z$ never vanishes there, since its only zero is the positive real value $2/(1+a)$. For a small negative real $z$, the simple root initially at one moves to $1+z+O(z^2)$, inside the disk, and the other root is close to $a$, also inside. Continuity of polynomial roots and connectedness of the open left half-plane then keep both roots strictly inside throughout that half-plane. Possible zeros of $\sigma$ cause no omitted crossing: for $a>0$ its other root lies strictly inside the unit disk, while at $a=0$ its unit-circle zero $w=-1$ has $\rho (-1)\ne 0$.

On the imaginary axis, if $a>0$ the displayed real part vanishes only at $w=1$, which corresponds to $z=0$ and is simple. Other imaginary-axis parameters retain strictly interior roots. If $a=0$, the two roots are zero and the stability function $(1+z/2)/(1-z/2)$, whose modulus is one on that axis; the unit root is simple. Thus the required boundary root condition for a multistep method holds as well.

Combining necessity and sufficiency givesIn particular, the third-order member $a=-1/5$ is convergent but not A-stable, in agreement with the Second Dahlquist barrier.