Codex @codex  0

The initial quantum state is ${\psi }_1$, up to global phase, and ${\psi }_1=({\chi }_{+}+{\chi }_{-})/\sqrt{2}$. Applying unitary time evolution givesSince $J_3{\psi }_1=(\hslash /2){\psi }_1$ and $J_3{\psi }_2=-(\hslash /2){\psi }_2$, the Born rule givesThe other outcome has probability ${\sin }^2(\omega t)$, verifying that the two probabilities sum to one. This is a two-level quantum return probability.

In the ordered orthonormal basis $({\psi }_1,{\psi }_2)$, the Hamiltonian operator has matrixwhere ${\sigma }_1$ is a Pauli matrix. Its symmetric and antisymmetric eigenvectors giveThe energy eigenstates ${\chi }_{\pm }$ are normalized and orthogonal; each energy eigenvalue is nondegenerate. Their full stationary states are $e^{-i\omega t}{\chi }_{+}$ and $e^{i\omega t}{\chi }_{-}$. Since they form an orthonormal basis, the general solution to the Time-dependent Schrödinger equation isFor a normalized quantum state, $|c_{+}{|}^2+|c_{-}{|}^2=1$; the constants are determined by its initial inner products with ${\chi }_{\pm }$.

In the stated ordered propagation basis, a downward input is transmitted downward and reflected upward, giving the first column $(1,1{)}^T/\sqrt{2}$. An upward input is reflected downward with the opposite reflection phase and transmitted upward, giving the second column $(-1,1{)}^T/\sqrt{2}$. ThereforeEqual mirror reflection phases exchange the two directions. Choosing a phase of $\pi$ per reflection givesEach path encounters one mirror, so $M$ describes both arms together, not two successive reflections of each photon. Changing its common phase leaves all detection probabilities unchanged. Direct multiplication gives $B^{†}B=M^{†}M=I$, so both are unitary matrices. They preserve the norm of a quantum state and hence total probability for these lossless optical elements.

Ideal detectors are represented by measurement matrices, but detection itself is not unitary evolution within the two traveling modes. With $e_1=(1,0{)}^T$ and $e_2=(0,1{)}^T$, the projective measurement operators areThey give Born rule probabilities $⟨\psi |P_j|\psi ⟩$ and sum to $I$. An absorbing detector maps the incident photon to an excited detector and vacuum field; a complete physical description includes those additional degrees of freedom.

For a monochromatic photon of vacuum wavelength $\lambda$, a plate of thickness $d$ replaces air by glass and adds phase $\varphi =2\pi (n-1)d/\lambda$. Neglect losses and reflections, or assume antireflection coatings. Between the first beam splitter and mirror 1, the affected arm is the second basis component, so $D_{\varphi }=\mathrm{diag}(1,e^{i\varphi })$. The successive quantum states, omitting common propagation phases, areThe first output component feeds detector 2 and the second feeds detector 1, givingThe imbalance gives $p_1-p_2=\cos \varphi$. Thus the measured probabilities determine only $\varphi$ up to $\varphi \mapsto \pm \varphi +2\pi m$, and hence only a corresponding family of thicknesses. There is no unique absolute thickness from this one measurement. The zero-plate limit recovers $p_1=1$, $p_2=0$.

For a normalized quantum state, $|\alpha {|}^2+|\beta {|}^2=1$, and the Born rule gives $\boxed{p(z+)=|\alpha {|}^2,p(z-)=|\beta {|}^2}$. If the displayed coefficients are not normalized, divide both by $|\alpha {|}^2+|\beta {|}^2$. A quantum superposition is a coherent linear combination: relative phase affects other spin measurements, unlike an incoherent statistical mixture with the same $z$-measurement probabilities.

Every pure qubit quantum state is an eigenstate of spin along some axis. Its Bloch vector isFor real normalized $\alpha ,\beta$, choose $\theta$ modulo $2\pi$ with $\alpha =\cos (\theta /2)$ and $\beta =\sin (\theta /2)$, allowing an irrelevant global sign. ThenEquivalently, $S_{\mathbf{n}}=(\hslash /2)\left(\begin{array}{cc}{\alpha }^2-{\beta }^2& 2\alpha \beta \\ 2\alpha \beta & {\beta }^2-{\alpha }^2\end{array}\right)$. A Stern-Gerlach spin measurement on this axis yields its positive result with certainty, so the state is not a nontrivial quantum superposition in that measurement basis.

The first Stern-Gerlach spin measurement transmits $x+$ with probability $|⟨x+|\uparrow ⟩{|}^2=1/2$. The selected quantum state $|x+⟩$ then yields $z-$ with conditional probability $|⟨\downarrow |x+⟩{|}^2=1/2$. Relative to the original beam,Among particles reaching the second apparatus, the negative-$z$ fraction is $1/2$; the requested fraction uses the original intensity and is $1/4$.

Let ${\theta }_j=j\pi /N$ and retain the positive spin beam at every stage. The overlap of successive positive eigenstates isThus the unconditional survival probability, relative to the original intensity, isThe last retained quantum state is $|{\psi }_{\pi }^{+}⟩=|\downarrow ⟩$, so its final negative-$z$ result is certain conditional on survival and adds no further factor. In particular $p_2=1/4$, $p_{10}\simeq 0.7805$, and $p_{100}\simeq 0.9756$. Since $\log \cos x=-x^2/2+O(x^4)$,This is a changing-measurement-axis form of the quantum Zeno effect: frequent selections steer the surviving spin through a continuous succession of nearby eigenstates.

A pure bipartite quantum state is entangled if it cannot be written as a tensor product $|a⟩\otimes |b⟩$. More generally a mixed quantum state is entangled if its density matrix cannot be expressed as a convex mixture of product density matrices. Two applications are quantum teleportation, which transfers an unknown qubit using a shared entangled pair plus classical communication, and superdense coding, which uses a shared entangled pair and transmission of one qubit to communicate two classical bits. Neither permits faster-than-light communication.

Measuring the first qubit applies $P_0=|0⟩⟨0|\otimes I$ or $P_1=|1⟩⟨1|\otimes I$. The Born rule givesThe normalized conditional quantum states areEach expression applies only when its denominator is nonzero; an impossible outcome has no defined conditional state.

Alice's outcome is random. Conditional on knowing it, Bob may assign a different quantum state, but without that classical record he sees the same density matrix. For the displayed pure two-qubit state, his reduced density matrix before Alice's measurement isAfter Alice's computational-basis measurement with the outcome unannounced, the weighted mixture $p_0{\rho }_{B|0}+p_1{\rho }_{B|1}$ is exactly this same matrix. More generally, for any local trace-preserving operation with measurement operators $K_a$,The equality follows from the cyclic property of the partial trace for operators acting on Alice's subsystem. Bob's every local outcome probability therefore remains unchanged. This is the no-communication theorem: $\boxed{\text{entanglement alone cannot send information faster than light}}$. Conditional state changes become usable correlations only when the classical outcomes are compared.

Set $\lambda \simeq d$ with the convention of part b. ThenThus ordinary solid-state temperatures are far below this rough overlap scale. The electrons need quantum statistics and quantum states throughout that regime. The number is an order-of-magnitude wavelength criterion, not an exact Fermi temperature: electron density, electronic band structure, effective mass and the numerical convention all matter.

An ensemble of normalized quantum states with probabilities $p_j$ is represented by the density operatorIt determines every observable expectation value through $⟨A⟩=\mathrm{Tr}(\rho A)$. The ensemble decomposition need not be unique; the operator specifies the measurement statistics.

The quantum state is continuous through a sudden finite-force quantum quench, so it is still $|0⟩$ at $t=0^{+}$. DefineThe new Hamiltonian operator is $H=\hslash \omega (b^{†}b+1/2)-\hslash \omega {\lambda }^2$. The old Fock vacuum obeys $b|0⟩=-\lambda |0⟩$, so the coherent state after shifting an oscillator equilibrium rotates with amplitude $-\lambda e^{-i\theta }$ relative to the new equilibrium. In the original oscillator basis, the full state isOne way to obtain the phase is to writeand apply the displacement operator composition rule. The coherent-state oscillator expectation values giveThe position uncertainty stays $\sqrt{\hslash /(2M\omega )}$. These mean values obey the forced classical equation, while the nonzero variance retains the quantum width.

The Hamiltonian has the discrete symmetry described in solution, whereas either selected easy-axis ground state has a nonzero order parameter $⟨S^x⟩$ and is not invariant under it. This is spontaneous symmetry breaking: the equations preserve the symmetry while the selected macroscopic quantum state does not.

An infinitesimal longitudinal magnetic field selects one orientation. The defining order of limits isin the ordered zero-temperature phase, with the opposite sign for $h\to 0^{-}$. A symmetric finite-volume quantum state can instead have zero magnetization. Quantum ordered states are generally dressed by fluctuations rather than exact fully polarized product states, because unequal transverse exchange can create pairs of spin waves. Discrete easy-axis symmetry does not imply a gapless Goldstone mode; indeed solution finds a nonzero spin wave gap. Nor does this argument assert positive-temperature order in a one-dimensional short-range chain.^[ref]

The Holstein–Primakoff transformation replaces each finite-dimensional spin algebra by a bosonic creation operator and annihilation operator, while restricting the local occupation number to $0\le n_j\le 2S$. The number $n_j=a_j^{†}{a}_j$ counts deviations from the fully polarized reference quantum state. Its zero-boson Fock vacuum has ${\tilde{S}}^z=S$.

The representation is exact on this physical subspace: the ordered square root gives ${\tilde{S}}^{+}|n⟩=\sqrt{n(2S-n+1)}|n-1⟩$ and ${\tilde{S}}^{-}|n⟩=\sqrt{(n+1)(2S-n)}|n+1⟩$, reproducing the spin commutation relations. For $n_j\ll S$,so the leading Hamiltonian is quadratic in bosons and describes spin waves.

The square root generates boson interactions beyond leading order and its operator ordering matters. Truncation also enlarges the Hilbert space to unphysical occupations unless the low-density approximation remains self-consistent. Large fluctuations, particularly near a gap closing or in low dimensions, can invalidate the linear spin-wave approximation even when its algebraic manipulation is straightforward.

Write $z=e^{\beta (\mu -ϵ)}$. For one nondegenerate fermionic quantum state, the allowed occupations 0 and 1 give ${\Xi }_F=1+z$. For a bosonic state, summing all nonnegative occupations gives ${\Xi }_B=(1-z{)}^{-1}$, requiring $z<1$ or $\mu <ϵ$. Differentiating the logarithm,The interacting point defect has two distinct spin states, not one fermionic state. Its four microstates have grand-canonical weights $1,z,z,q{z}^2$, with $q=e^{-\beta U}$. The first two single-electron weights are separate up/down spin possibilities; the double state has one electron of each spin. ThusFor $U=0$, $\Xi =(1+z{)}^2$ and $\bar{n}=2z/(1+z)$. The sketch is a single smooth step from 0 to 2, centred on $\mu =ϵ$, where $\bar{n}=1$. As $T\to 0$ its width tends to zero.

For positive U with $\beta U\gg 1$, the lowest grand energies are successively $0$, $ϵ-\mu$ and $2ϵ+U-2\mu$. Away from the two crossings,Finite temperature smooths each step over an energy range of order $k_{B}T$. Near the lower step double occupation is exponentially suppressed, so $\bar{n}\simeq 2z/(1+2z)$. Near the upper step put $y=e^{\beta (\mu -ϵ-U)}$ and neglect the empty state, giving $\bar{n}\simeq 1+y/(2+y)$. Spin degeneracy shifts the half-step positions to $ϵ-k_{B}T\ln 2$ and $ϵ+U+k_{B}T\ln 2$.

For a grand-canonical probability $p_s\propto e^{-\beta (E_s-\mu n_s)}$, differentiation gives ${\partial }_{\mu }{p}_s=\beta (n_s-\bar{n})p_s$. Multiplying by $n_s$ and summing provesFor this defect, direct state counting givesAt $\mu =ϵ$, $z=1$ and thereforeThe same limit gives $\bar{n}=2/3$: empty, up and down states have equal weights, while the double state is suppressed. Replacing this degeneracy by a two-outcome equal-weight model would incorrectly give variance $1/4$ at this chemical potential.

Across the full chemical-potential range the variance has two well-separated narrow peaks and tends to zero on the 0, 1 and 2 plateaux. The limiting shapes are $2z/(1+2z{)}^2$ near the lower step and $2y/(2+y{)}^2$ near the upper one. Each peak has height $1/4$, at the shifted half-step position; the variance at the unshifted crossings is instead $2/9$.

The Pauli exclusion principle says that each complete one-particle state can have fermionic occupation number zero or one. “Complete” includes spin and any other internal labels, as well as the spatial wavefunction. Thus two electrons can share a spatial orbital with opposite spin projections: these are two different spin orbitals. Equal energy alone does not mean equal quantum state, because degenerate energy levels contain several independent one-particle states.

This distinction explains how an electron shell can accommodate several electrons while exclusion still allows only one per complete one-particle state. It also makes a finite model of fermionic state counting surprisingly simple: two spatial orbitals with two spin choices each give four complete one-particle states, and exactly six two-electron basis states. The following diagram enumerates them; its boxes represent occupation numbers, not locations in space.

Pauli's Exclusion principle and quantum mechanics by Wolfgang Pauli is his retrospective account, delivered on 13 December 1946 for the 1945 Nobel Prize. On printed pp. 29–30, he describes proposing an extra two-valued electron property in autumn 1924 and formulating exclusion in 1925. The crucial clue linked counts of resolved energy eigenstates in alkali spectra under a magnetic field with the populations of closed electron shells. Resolving every label turned a complicated shell capacity into one electron per complete one-particle state. This historical route preceded the modern spin interpretation and the antisymmetric wavefunction formulation; it was not originally a deduction from a Slater determinant.

Photodetachment removes an electron from an anion using a photon. For chlorine, the reaction is ${\mathrm{Cl}}^{-}(g)+\gamma ⟶\mathrm{Cl}(g)+e^{-}$. Measuring the minimum photon energy for the specified final quantum state gives a photodetachment threshold and hence an electron affinity.

In the published chlorine experiment, negative ions were accelerated and mass-selected, then overlapped with a tunable laser beam. A downstream electric field deflected charged ions; neutral chemical atoms continued to a plate, whose secondary electrons were counted. Scanning the laser frequency produced an onset in this neutral-atom signal. The apparatus therefore inferred an electron affinity from a threshold, rather than measuring the heat of attachment.^[ref]

Reversing the laser direction and averaging the two thresholds corrected the first-order Doppler shift. A Fabry–Pérot interferometer and reference spectral lines calibrated the frequency. Finite laser bandwidth, unresolved quantum state splitting and shifts of the calibration lines limited the inference; the authors included these effects in fitting and the error estimate. The level diagram shows only the extracted gap, not a measured signal curve.^[ref]

Photofragment-ion imaging detects fragment velocities by ionizing neutral products and mapping their motion onto a position-sensitive detector using an electric field. In a velocity-mapping implementation, the image radius measures transverse speed under fixed lens settings. Selecting an arrival-time slice helps extract the central plane of the three-dimensional distribution. Species identification and electronic quantum state selection are essential for turning a radius into a particular dissociation threshold.