Kusch-Foley magnetic moment experiment 2026-10-18
Polykarp Kusch and Henry Michael Foley compared hyperfine structure resonance frequencies for different electronic states of gallium, indium and sodium. Their 1948 paper reports mutually consistent departures from the ratios expected with orbital factor and spin factor . Comparing several states constrained the alternative explanation of perturbed atomic levels.[ref]
The Magnetic Moment of the Electron by Polykarp Kusch and Henry Michael Foley (1948). Abstract: atomic states, frequency comparisons and interpretation
The Rabi molecular beam magnetic resonance experiment explains the readout principle: a resonant transition changes an atom's magnetic response, and hence its transmitted beam signal. Kusch describes rapidly interchangeable ovens, several radio frequency oscillators and careful field homogenization. Measurements taken during monotonic field drift were reduced to a common field.[ref]
The magnetic moment of the electron by Polykarp Kusch. pp. 303–304: resonance analysis, ovens, oscillators and field drift
Compare differently weighted atomic magnetic moments
. Original functional diagram of the Kusch-Foley magnetic moment experiment and a separate ideal LS coupling calculation. The upper flow identifies the functions of beam preparation, resonance readout and atomic modeling; it is not a surviving apparatus drawing. The lower weights are calculated for , , and chosen , without nuclear spin. The frequencies in the teaching model cannot be substituted directly for measured hyperfine lines. Details.Real hyperfine structure lines are not simply bare electronic times field. Nuclear magnetic moments, known interaction constants and nonlinear field dependence enter the inference.[ref]
The magnetic moment of the electron by Polykarp Kusch. pp. 303–305: hyperfine modeling and atomic-state perturbations
Field homogeneity controls line broadening; alternating species addresses drift. Neither control removes an error in the atomic model. The beauty of the comparison is the separation of two problems: cancelling a shared calibration scale and testing whether several physical systems imply the same electron spin g-factor. Nuclear magnetic resonance Created 2026-10-13 Updated 2026-10-18
Nuclear magnetic resonance detects the response of atomic nuclei with a magnetic moment to a radio frequency magnetic field in a steady magnetic field. Its striking possibility is to measure a nuclear property through an ordinary electrical signal from a bulk sample: an enormous number of tiny magnetic moments can produce a measurable change in a receiving circuit.
For a nucleus with spin angular momentum , define its gyromagnetic ratio by . Throughout this article is angular, measured in radians per second per tesla; is the corresponding value in cycles per second per tesla. With , the Hamiltonian is . Adjacent energy levels differ byThus a measured resonance frequency and a calibrated magnetic field determine . Converting that into a nuclear magnetic moment also requires the spin quantum number: the maximum projection has magnitude . This simple experiment does not by itself determine the sign of .
The Rabi molecular beam magnetic resonance experiment detects transitions through changes in a selected molecular beam. The bulk experiments below instead detect electrical consequences of nuclear magnetization in matter at ordinary density. A small Boltzmann distribution population imbalance is multiplied by a very large number of nuclei. For noninteracting spin one-half nuclei of number density and positive , their equilibrium magnetization isThis follows by weighting the two projections with their Boltzmann distribution probabilities. It explains both the smallness of the bulk polarization at ordinary temperature and the value of many nuclei contributing to one receiving circuit.
NMR spectroscopy measures resonant responses of atomic nuclei to applied electromagnetic radiation in a magnetic field. In residual-group monitoring of polyurethane formation, distinguishable signal integrals supply a relative residual-group readout; overlap or very weak signals can limit that inference.
In 1938, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Jerrold Zacharias, Sidney Millman and Polykarp Kusch introduced molecular-beam magnetic resonance. Their 1939 account describes a heated oven, vacuum slits, inhomogeneous A/B magnetic fields with opposite gradients, and a uniform static C magnetic field. Conductors supplied transverse oscillatory radiofrequency (RF) fields. Transitions spoiled refocusing, reducing the tungsten-filament detector signal. Alignment compared A-only and B-only attenuation; C-field sweeps at fixed RF frequency limited oscillator pickup. Matching frequency/field ratios across compounds checked nuclear assignments. Magnetic field calibration limited absolute magnetic moments; weak intervening fields caused unwanted transitions.[ref]
The Molecular Beam Resonance Method for Measuring Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Isidor Isaac Rabi and others. Rabi, Millman, Kusch and Zacharias, Physical Review 55 (1939), pp. 526–533; Figs. 1–5; Apparatus, Procedure and Results; p. 526 references to the 1938 reports
Functional beam selector: unchanged states refocus; RF transitions cause detector loss
. Original functional diagram of the Rabi molecular beam magnetic resonance experiment; paths are schematic and not to scale. Details.The readout has a useful logical structure: A and the apertures admit trajectories correlated with a magnetic moment projection; B tests whether that projection has survived C. The two deflectors compensate for unchanged states, whereas a changed projection experiences a different force in B. A dip followed by recovery as the static magnetic field passes through resonance is therefore a population-sensitive signal. A comparison with RF absent or far from resonance is the natural baseline in this functional model; RF pickup, drift or background loss must not be mistaken for a state transition. A dip alone does not establish a pure initial quantum state or resolve an entire time-domain Rabi cycle.
This beam method measures transmitted particles after state-dependent deflection. The later bulk nuclear magnetic resonance methods of Felix Bloch and Edward Mills Purcell instead use a macroscopic sample and detect nuclear induction or RF absorption; NMR spectroscopy builds on that bulk setting. The common resonant coupling does not make their preparations or readouts interchangeable.[ref]
Our History by Stanford University Physics Department. Physics Department, Our History, The Middle 1930s through the 1960s, paragraphs on nuclear induction in condensed matter and spectroscopy
[ref]Harvard’s Nobel Laureates in Physics by Harvard University. Harvard’s Nobel Laureates in Physics, Edward M. Purcell section, nuclear magnetic resonance absorption
A moving chemical atom or molecule can experience the two pulses of Ramsey interferometry by flying through two short oscillatory-field regions. Their common oscillator supplies the reference quantum phase; the flight between them supplies the interrogation time. The long interval need not contain a driving field. This turns a spatial apparatus into a coherent pulse sequence and makes narrow spectral lines possible without filling the entire flight path with a uniform oscillatory field.
Norman Foster Ramsey, Jr.'s 1950 paper calculates the two-state transition probability and averages it over molecular velocities. It is a theoretical investigation, rather than a report of an atomic clock's measured accuracy.[ref]
A Molecular Beam Resonance Method with Separated Oscillating Fields by Norman Foster Ramsey, Jr.. Physical Review 78 (1950), pp. 695–699, abstract: separated interaction regions, transition probability and molecular-velocity average
His 1989 lecture contrasts an electric-resonance apparatus photograph with a magnetic-resonance schematic. Coherent drive regions bracket a static-field flight region; state-dependent deflection converts transitions into detector changes, while differing flight times suppress side fringes.[ref]
Experiments with Separated Oscillatory Fields and Hydrogen Masers by Norman Foster Ramsey, Jr.. 1989 lecture, pp. 553–558, Figs. 1–2, 4–6
The readout infers a change of internal quantum state through state-dependent transmission, as in the Rabi molecular beam magnetic resonance experiment. A useful control is to block one drive region: a narrow fringe requiring both interactions must disappear. Changing the second region's oscillation phase should move the fringe, whereas an incoherent background need not move. These are consequences of the model below, not additional historical measurements. A detector dip alone neither proves perfect preparation nor determines all apparatus-induced frequency shifts; cesium-beam clock procedure adds the controls needed for a practical atomic clock.
The publication sequence begins with Norman Foster Ramsey, Jr.'s 1949 article A New Molecular Beam Resonance Method, Physical Review 76, p. 996, published 1 October; the fuller theoretical paper followed in 1950.[ref]
https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.76.996. Byline and publication record
NIST-7 supplied a practical realization: optical pumping moved caesium populations into the manifold, without isolating . Two separated microwave interactions probed the clock transition; fluorescence detected transferred atoms. A synthesized reference, tied to a hydrogen maser, sampled opposite sides of resonance for feedback control. Beam reversal tested cavity quantum phase bias; independent velocity determinations checked motion corrections. The observed central fringe resolved the transition, but power-dependent velocity weighting and light shifts still required evaluation.[ref]

