Let be the filling-box first front, with . Below it the original fluid has not yet been through the plume. In the filling box model, the turbulent plume adjusts rapidly and occupies a negligible fraction of the room's area. A point source with negligible source volume flux supplies . All its volume crossing the front grows the processed region, so volume conservation gives
Put . Integrating yields
The first front approaches the floor only as . A nonzero source volume flux would require an equal exhaust to keep the room volume fixed; it is treated in the following parts.
Let be the liquid density and neglect atmospheric shear. The shallow-channel lubrication approximation makes the surface nearly horizontal in each cross-section, at , with hydrostatic pressure . At fixed , the floor is and the local liquid thickness is . Axial momentum and boundary conditions are
Writing , integration gives
The wetted interval is . Its cross-sectional area and total axial flux are
The shallow V-channel lubrication flux and volume conservation therefore give
The slope makes transverse shear small relative to vertical shear; the longitudinal current must also be slender for this reduction.
For typical height and axial length , fixed volume gives , while the equation gives . Eliminating either scale yields
Thus the current grows in length like and thins like . Equivalently, the porous-medium transformation of V-channel spreading sets and gives with constant mass .
Seek a symmetric solution with . Substitution into the conservative depth equation gives
The left side is . Symmetry sets the integration constant to zero, so within the support. Integrating gives . In physical variables the constant-volume similarity in a V-shaped channel is
where is the half-length of its support and the positive part makes outside it.
Define the positive normalization
The first substitution is ; the gamma form follows from the beta function integral. Conservation of volume now gives
and consequently
The full current length is . Its flux vanishes at the two noses, since the integrated similarity equation gives there, so no volume is lost at the support boundary. A shifted origin or a positive shift of time gives the corresponding translated similarity family.
In an intended trigonometric notation, requires either cosine integrated over or absolute cosine over . The printed on is not a positive real normalization for the required fractional exponent: with a real cube-root interpretation at , its two halves cancel, while the principal complex power is not real. The similarity normalization uses the positive sine integral above.
Assume the shallow-water approximation: the horizontal scale is long compared with the depth, the hydrostatic approximation applies, and the cross-section-averaged velocity is approximately uniform. Neglect viscosity and drag for this part. Volume conservation gives the constant discharge . The steady horizontal momentum equation is
so its integral is the Bernoulli equation head . The shallow-water specific energy measured above the bed is therefore
The Froude number compares the flow velocity with the long-wave speed :
At fixed , the shallow-water specific energy tends to infinity as tends to zero or infinity. Its unique minimum occurs at the critical depth
The two depth branches above that minimum are subcritical flow, with , and supercritical flow, with . The long-wave characteristic speeds relative to the bed are . Thus a subcritical flow can receive information from downstream, whereas both characteristic curves travel downstream in a positive supercritical flow.
A hydraulic control is a critical section where one characteristic speed vanishes and a smooth flow can pass between the two branches. Regularity there supplies a condition relating , the depth and the geometry; together with reservoir or inlet data, it can determine the discharge. Merely finding is not enough: a finite depth gradient also requires the geometric forcing to vanish in the critical momentum equation.
The occupied cross-sectional area and interface width are
The incoming volume flux per unit channel length is . Volume conservation therefore gives . Ambient fluid carries no excess mass density, so integrating the excess-mass density balance gives . These two equations imply dilution of the reduced gravity, even though total integrated buoyancy is conserved.
The integrated horizontal hydrostatic pressure force, divided by the reference mass density, is
The prismatic walls contribute no axial component of pressure force. Since ambient fluid enters with zero horizontal velocity, it supplies no horizontal momentum flux. Thus the entraining shallow-water current in a triangular channel obeys the conservative equations
To put them in primitive form, let be the material derivative. The volume equation gives . Subtracting times the volume equation from the momentum equation, and times it from the buoyancy equation, yields
The momentum source is the acceleration of newly entrained ambient fluid, not bed drag. The source in the reduced gravity equation describes mixing with ambient fluid of zero excess mass density. In particular, the rectangular-channel coefficients cannot be used: the triangular area produces both in the depth equation and in the buoyancy-gradient force.
Hindered settling is the reduction of the particle settling velocity by displaced-fluid backflow and interactions with other particles. In the specified model, the downward speed is at vanishing concentration and falls to zero at the maximum packing fraction . The characteristic speed of a concentration disturbance will differ from this individual-particle speed.
Take positive upwards. For a locally uniform horizontal suspension without diffusion or bulk fluid motion, the upward particle flux is
Particle volume conservation gives the scalar conservation law
This is the quadratic hindered-settling flux. Along its characteristic curves,
For a smooth initial profile , the map is . Its Jacobian is . A shock develops where this first reaches zero: the compressive condition is , and
when the minimum is negative and no earlier boundary discontinuity is imposed. A discontinuous compressive initial state can instead contain a shock from .
Let separate states below the shock and above it. Integrating the conservation law across a moving thin interval gives the Rankine-Hugoniot condition
Equivalently, the flux relative to the shock agrees on both sides. For this quadratic flux,
Since , a physical compression shock has and satisfies : characteristic curves enter it from both sides. These conditions select the shock over a nonphysical expansive discontinuity.
The entrainment coefficient is the ratio of the inward ambient-fluid velocity normal to a buoyant plume edge to the characteristic buoyant plume velocity. For an upward buoyant plume, take . There are two edges at half-width , so the full-section volume source is . Dividing every integral balance by two gives consistent half-section equations.
For top-hat plume profiles, volume conservation and mass conservation are
The mass entering the buoyant plume is ambient mass with local mass density . The Boussinesq approximation uses a common reference mass density in inertia while retaining the mass density deficit in buoyancy. The mass equation may be kept to the first order in that deficit to derive its transport.
Multiply the volume equation by the time-independent ambient mass density. The product rule gives
Subtract the mass equation and multiply by . The entrainment sources cancel exactly, leaving
where
For stable stratification, and the buoyancy frequency is real. Rising fluid moves into lighter ambient fluid and loses its mass density deficit relative to that local ambient. Thus environmental stratification reduces the buoyant plume's buoyancy flux, even though the ambient fluid entering by entrainment contributes no mass density deficit at its own height.
Apply differentiation under the integral sign on the moving drop:
The moving-boundary term vanishes because . At the origin, symmetry and regularity give . At the front, the stated gives . Thus , expressing volume conservation for this axisymmetric viscous gravity current.
With and , substitute the self-similar solution into the conserved integral:
For a nonzero finite drop volume, the power of must vanish, so . Balancing powers in the evolution equation gives the same result: its left side scales as and its right side as . The front-edge exponent alone would not determine this spreading exponent without the conserved volume.
At a fixed time, the complete spatial derivative is
The first term describes geometric variation along the channel at a fixed surface elevation. The second describes the extra wetted area produced by a varying water level; is the surface width.
Assume a fixed channel, negligible lateral inflow, uniform cross-sectional velocity, incompressible water and the hydrostatic long-wave approximation. Integrating volume conservation over a short channel segment gives
Inviscid horizontal momentum, with measured from the fixed datum, is . The coefficient matrix acting on has eigenvalues
These are the variable-section channel characteristics. Put . Adding the corresponding linear combinations of the two equations gives
The opposite signs in the two combinations cancel both derivative terms in the source calculation.
If , then and . Taking along a characteristic gives the requested form
A sufficient geometry assumption is , for which is independent of at fixed height.
For a completely general , the printed form omits an explicit wave-speed geometry term. The correct conversion is instead
For example, a lake at rest with constant but position-dependent has . The printed left side is then nonzero while its right side is zero. The -based compatibility equation remains valid, including when makes the speed-based expression singular.
Let , and . The inviscid shallow water equations are
Taking the vertical curl of the momentum equation, with constant , gives . Combining this with the depth equation proves
Thus shallow-water potential vorticity is materially conserved: changes in absolute vorticity are exactly compensated by stretching or compression of the layer depth.
The relation to a Bernoulli function presupposes steady flow. In that case define . The vector identity gives
Steady volume conservation allows a transport stream function with . Hence , so
In particular, : the Bernoulli function is constant along each streamline. Where the flow permits a single-valued dependence on the stream function, the displayed derivative describes how that constant changes between neighbouring streamlines. For an unsteady flow, shallow-water potential vorticity remains conserved but the stated steady Bernoulli function relation does not generally hold.
Assume the ambient fluid has zero downslope velocity, no bed drag, and an entrainment coefficient . The entraining shallow-water layer receives volume at rate , but neither excess buoyancy nor downslope momentum from that ambient fluid. Consequently volume conservation, conservation of excess buoyancy, and momentum conservation give
The pressure contribution is the integral of the hydrostatic pressure from part (a). The last source is the downslope component of the gravitational force.
With , the equivalent equations are
The last term is the momentum required to accelerate newly entrained fluid. For variables , the matrix of the spatial derivatives is
Thus it is a strictly hyperbolic system for and . At all three characteristic speeds coincide and the matrix is not diagonalizable. The exclusion of that angle presumes the physical range with : allowing an overhanging channel with would also destroy hyperbolicity.
The channel is prismatic: its width depends on height, not on . A layer of depth has cross-sectional area . Volume conservation gives . With , the integrated excess hydrostatic pressure force is
Thus the streamwise momentum balance is . Under the specified vertical-settling approximation, the horizontal projection of the depositional boundary has width , so the particle balance is , where is the downward speed magnitude. The prismatic triangular-channel shallow water equations are therefore
The pressure coefficient is the section-weighted mean of . The factor two in deposition comes from top width divided by area. There is no streamwise widening term, because is constant along the channel.
Define the positive characteristic speed scale . In variables the equations become
The coefficient matrix of this hyperbolic system has eigenvalues . Hence the three characteristic families are
Along , the concentration equation is the ordinary differential equation . Along , the left eigenvectors give the sedimenting triangular-channel characteristic compatibility equations
Here every derivative in a given equation follows that characteristic family, and . These three compatibility equations form the characteristic description; they are not three independent closed equations for all fields on any one curve. In particular, are not conserved Riemann invariants when the concentration varies: its differential and the deposition source must both be retained. The description assumes ; the dry or zero-buoyancy limit is degenerate.
Apply volume conservation, mass conservation and vertical momentum flux balance to a slice of the triangular-profile line plume. Ambient ingestion contributes of volume and of mass per unit height and source length. The ambient is quiescent, so it supplies no leading vertical momentum. The integrated driving force is the stored buoyancy . Using the quantities from part (a), the non-Boussinesq triangular-profile line-plume balances are
Together with Batchelor entrainment, these are three equations for . They neglect viscous boundary stresses and streamwise pressure-force corrections within the integral-plume approximation.
Multiplying volume conservation by and subtracting times mass conservation cancels the ambient sources exactly, giving
This is buoyancy conservation in the homogeneous ambient; it is a consequence of the first two balances, not an additional independent equation.
Now take the Boussinesq approximation in inertia and entrainment, retaining the small density deficit in buoyancy. Then , and . Consequently
The mass source is . Substitution into the mass conservation, momentum and buoyancy balances gives the unsteady Boussinesq triangular-profile line-plume balances
These use density-weighted mass and momentum fluxes. Removing from some flux definitions while retaining it in the source would mix incompatible conventions.
Use the steady Boussinesq top-hat plume in a stratified ambient, with negligible ambient vertical momentum and no externally added heat or particles. The Batchelor entrainment hypothesis supplies inward velocity across circumference . Volume conservation gives , and , hence
The momentum flux increases by the integrated buoyancy force. Writing , the force per reference density and per is . Since and , this gives
For the buoyancy flux, entrained material has the local environmental mass density. Let be the plume's averaged density. Its scalar mass conservation is . Since , differentiating cancels both entrainment terms and gives
In stable density stratification, and a rising plume loses buoyancy flux. These are kinematic fluxes with the common factor removed, so no additional factor of belongs in the three differential equations.
Seek a steady downslope solution with constant. The volume conservation equation reduces to , so the constant-speed entraining gravity current on a slope has
The conserved buoyancy flux per unit width is , giving
Substitute these expressions into the momentum equation. Its advective term is and its hydrostatic term is . The balance is therefore
which gives
The assumed slope inequality makes . The increasing thickness dilutes reduced gravity while leaving and the buoyancy flux constant. The denominator includes both bottom drag and the momentum needed to accelerate newly entrained ambient fluid.
Choose the positive direction along the background flow, so ; reverse if necessary. Let measure depth below the impermeable roof, and set . The deep ambient water has . Continuity of pressure at and hydrostatic pressure inside the buoyant CO2 give
Here is permeability of a porous medium and is dynamic viscosity. Since , the ambient return-flow correction to the imposed pressure gradient is higher order. The small aspect ratio supplies the hydrostatic pressure approximation; capillary trapping, dissolution, compressibility and dispersion are omitted in this sharp-interface model.
The depth-integrated Darcy flux is . The actual stored fluid volume is per unit horizontal area, where is the aquifer porosity. Thus the porous gravity current with background flow satisfies
with , and . Both and the later denote actual injected volume per unit transverse width. Away from injection, the equation is an advected porous medium equation. At each finite front impose and vanishing outgoing volume flux per unit width. At the injection point is continuous and . For an initially empty aquifer, . The advective speed is , not .
For a constant-flux porous gravity current, write characteristic depth and extent temporarily. At early times volume conservation gives ; gravity spreading gives . Hence
Background advection becomes comparable when , so the transition scales are
For , the leading similarity solution is symmetric:
For , its model ordinary differential equation and boundary conditions are
Choose the nonnegative finite-front branch, reflect evenly in , and require at the front. The factor divides the injection equally between the two halves. Integration of the ordinary differential equation gives ; the limiting front slope is . This boundary-value problem determines the initially symmetric shape without assuming an unjustified elementary formula. Independent numerical integration gives in this normalization.
For , upstream storage approaches a finite steady value. With no upstream leakage, for , giving wherever . Downstream the uniform interior carries , so
The upstream volume flux vanishes even though local Darcy velocity contributions from background flow and buoyancy cancel. The upstream stored volume is , a finite constant. The downstream plateau therefore extends a distance , and its front advances at to leading order.
The diffusive nose of an advected porous gravity current has width
In a frame translating at , balance the time derivative against the nonlinear gravity diffusion. With and , the leading transition is , with
Its finite front has as . Independent numerical integration of this boundary-value problem gives , so a more accurate leading nose position is and its local shape is . The entire transition has no elementary closed form. A useful explicit, approximate shape is the volume-preserving linear ramp
This gives . Its ramp width is , and its edge obeys the exact kinematic boundary condition to the displayed order. It also has the same area as a sharp step at . This is an approximate ramp closure, not an exact solution of the nonlinear nose ordinary differential equation. A constant phase shift balances the finite upstream storage within this ramp approximation; the full solution's subleading matching may alter constant offsets.
For a rapid injection of total volume , remove the source for and introduce . The advected constant-volume porous gravity current obeys and . A similarity solution has depth proportional to and radius proportional to . Direct substitution gives the compactly supported Barenblatt solution
Indeed . Its centre translates at the pore speed , its two edges are , and its maximum depth decays as . The expression is exact for a point release within this reduced model; finite-width initial data approach this similarity solution at late times. If , the constant-rate current remains in the symmetric spreading regime and the constant-volume solution has a stationary centre.
Take upward from the horizontal bed and measure away from an ice divide. In the shallow-ice approximation, the hydrostatic pressure is and the horizontal balance for a Newtonian fluid is
The upper stress-free boundary condition gives . The resisting basal traction is , so the fluid-side shear stress satisfies . This is a Navier slip boundary condition with slip length . Integrating twice gives
The first term is the uniform basal sliding contribution, while the quadratic term is internal viscous deformation. Both are positive where the thickness decreases downstream.
The shallow-ice flux with linear basal drag is
No ice accumulation or ice ablation appears. For a symmetric glacier, work on one half, , with , and no outgoing volume flux. Its conserved half-volume per unit width is ; the full glacier has volume . This specifies the volume convention rather than silently supplying an unspecified value. For a general finite release on the whole line, the late similarity solution is centred on its conserved centre of mass and uses half its total volume for .
The internal-shear and linear basal drag law mobilities are equal at . Suitable vertical, horizontal and temporal scales are
Write , , . Then
The initial typical thickness is , the initial extent is of order , and its shear-controlled spreading time is of order . The shallow-ice approximation also requires small aspect ratio: in particular the initial thickness and extent must satisfy approximately . The equations model the broad shallow bulk; the very tip can require physics beyond that approximation.
The two limiting equations are porous medium equations of the form , with for a thick shear-dominated glacier and for a thin sliding-dominated glacier. Volume conservation and balance of the time derivative give exponent . Set , . One integration, using zero volume flux at the ice divide, gives , hence
The planar volume-conserving nonlinear-diffusion similarity is therefore
The Beta function fixes its constants:
Consequently the explicit early shear and late sliding limits are
Their centre depths are with , and with . Thus the early extent grows as and the late extent as . These are asymptotic regime profiles; they solve the respective limiting equations, not the full sum of both mobilities. For arbitrary finite-width initial data they are appropriate after the corresponding spatial relaxation, with a virtual time origin depending on that data.
The shear-to-slip transition in a shallow ice current occurs at thickness of order . Using equality at the centre of the early similarity solution gives
If the initial profile is already approximated by that early similarity solution and its centre depth is 10, the virtual age is , and the elapsed estimate is . Other reasonable definitions of typical thickness change the order-one coefficient; the initial thickness alone does not uniquely determine an exact transition time or an exact initial profile. The robust nondimensional estimate is a transition time of order one in the scale.
Finally, let a local nose translate steadily at positive speed and write . This is a local traveling nose of a glacier with linear basal drag; the speed of the globally spreading glacier changes slowly with time. The local mass conservation equation integrates to , since both and vanish at the front. Therefore
Figure 1.
Combined basal-slip and internal-shear glacier nose, with square-root and cube-root limits
. Details.
The right side is strictly increasing, giving a unique positive thickness at every . With and , the same relation reads . Its limiting profiles are
The square-root tip reflects basal sliding; the cube-root thicker region reflects internal viscous deformation. Even during the early thick regime, the very nose is thin and has the square-root inner form. At late times that sliding balance governs nearly the whole profile. The dimensionless crossover thickness is and its distance is ; the early thick cube-root outer profile matches this smaller sliding region. The diverging geometric slope at the idealized tip also marks the local limit of the long-wave shallow-ice approximation.
Write for the height of the filling-box first front above the floor and for the upward plume volume flux crossing it. Neglect the plume's horizontal area compared with , use the Boussinesq approximation, and measure buoyancy relative to the initially unmodified ambient. The first front separates fluid already modified by plume discharge from the unmodified fluid below; the entire upper region need not be uniformly mixed during an unventilated filling box model transient.
A finite injected volume flux cannot enter a hermetically sealed, fixed-volume room under the incompressible flow assumption. If , an equal overflow or exhaust is needed. Taking that exhaust at the ceiling, volume conservation of the region above the front gives
The source volume flux is subtracted because only entrained room fluid is removed from the initially unmodified region. The printed pure plume law has , so it cannot be an exact finite- source law down to the physical floor. In the far field where , or for a heat source whose injected volume flux is negligible, it gives
Here is when the plume discharge first reaches the ceiling. Retaining while using the far-field law gives only while that law remains a valid approximation; it must not be extrapolated to predict negative plume entrainment. A plume virtual origin below the floor is one way to match a nonzero source volume flux.
For displacement ventilation, let be the total ceiling exhaust, the total buoyant-source volume flux, and the separate ambient inflow into the lower layer. Volume conservation and the upper-layer buoyancy flux balance give
The ambient inflow has zero reference buoyancy. In the ideal two-layer closure the upper layer is uniformly mixed with reduced gravity , and the lower layer has zero reference buoyancy. The plume supplies the upper layer while lighter upper-layer air is removed at the ceiling. An interface is driven downward when and upward when ; since , its equilibrium is stable.
In the negligible-source-volume pure plume limit, identifying gives the intended one-source answer
The prescribed inequality makes , so both layers fit in the room. It does not, by itself, justify neglecting a finite source : the pure plume source region must also be small compared with , normally requiring . If denotes additional background ventilation rather than total exhaust, replace in both formulas by . If it is total exhaust, the separate ambient inlet carries . These conventions must not be mixed.
For independent equal axisymmetric pure plumes, adding their volume fluxes gives
Thus the conventional multiple-plume displacement ventilation calculation with negligible source volume flux and separate ambient ventilation gives
Splitting the buoyancy flux increases total fluid entrainment, so the same ventilation balances the plumes at a lower interface. The global buoyancy flux is unchanged, which leaves the upper-layer reduced gravity unchanged. Independence requires sufficiently separated sources and plumes that do not merge below the interface.
There is, however, a substantive problem with the literal source-volume specification in this paragraph of the PDF. It puts all through the buoyant sources, so and . For every positive interface height, entraining plumes have
There is no fresh ambient inflow to replace the lower-layer fluid being entrained. Consequently the stated positive steady two-layer configuration does not follow from those literal hypotheses. This is no steady displacement layer without ambient supply, not a small correction to the scaling. For example, a matched plume virtual origin gives
When , this yields . The unshifted answer equals the omitted in this case, so neglecting the source region cannot be justified. Also each source has reference buoyancy , already equal to the proposed upper-layer value; a steady positive plume cannot entrain zero-buoyancy lower fluid and still deliver that same value. The conventional answer is valid for a corrected arrangement with negligible-volume buoyancy sources and a separate ambient inlet, or with source flux and the remaining supplied directly to the lower layer. A real room may have other circulation or continuous stratification, but that requires a different model.
For the intended displacement ventilation model, reducing the exhaust to makes the new equilibrium
The interface initially descends since its old plume volume flux exceeds the new exhaust. In ventilated filling-box relaxation, writing and taking the linearization of the two balances above gives
As , the two decay times are
A dimensional analysis estimate of the full adjustment time is therefore
The interface adjusts on the shorter lower-layer scale; replacing the buoyancy stored throughout the upper layer is slower. Exact equilibrium is approached asymptotically, and a specified small relative tolerance adds a logarithmic factor. For the literal all-inflow-through-sources arrangement there is no positive two-layer equilibrium to return to; is only a flushing-scale estimate for a different, whole-room adjustment.
Use a two-sided top-hat line plume with full width , upward speed , and reduced gravity uniform across the plume. Fluxes are measured per unit span along the line source: the volume flux is , the kinematic momentum flux is , and the buoyancy flux is . If the inward edge speed is , where is the entrainment coefficient, the two exposed edges give
These are the volume conservation, momentum conservation, and buoyancy flux balances for a Boussinesq approximation plume in an unstratified ambient. Entrained ambient fluid supplies neither vertical momentum nor reference buoyancy.
A pure plume has no persistent source length scale. Since a line-source has dimensions , dimensional analysis gives constant , , and . Substituting constant into and the momentum balance determines the coefficients:
Thus and when width is full width and velocity and buoyancy have top-hat profiles. If width means half-width, instead. Other prescribed profile shapes change these numerical factors; the linear growth laws remain the same. The point-source in Question 1 has different dimensions, so its law must not be used here.
Let be local contaminant concentration and let be horizontally integrated plume concentration. Its conserved amount per unit span is . The dilute contaminant is a passive scalar; the maintained plume is unaffected by its impulsive release. A one-dimensional effective transport closure takes the integrated scalar flux to be
The constant advective speed and the eddy diffusivity scaling follow from the line-plume scales. The entrainment coefficient alone does not determine the scalar dispersion coefficient: this Fickian closure for the integrated variable is an additional modelling assumption. Mass conservation then gives the displayed transport equation in the PDF. With this effective closure and advective speed chosen as , ; if , then , with independent dimensionless mixing coefficient .
There is a second possible closure convention. If one instead applies local diffusive flux to horizontally averaged plume concentration , its integrated diffusive flux is . For , the total scalar flux is then . The same printed equation is obtained with , rather than . Thus the printed and should be regarded as effective coefficients unless the averaging and closure conventions are specified; no equality between and the velocity prefactor is universal.
Assume , , an initial impulse at the origin, no further contaminant input, and zero endpoint scalar flux for . For a similarity solution, put
Substituting into the advection-diffusion equation gives
Decay at infinity makes the integrated constant zero. Hence , and normalization with the Gamma function gives . The resulting gamma impulse solution for linearly increasing diffusivity is
Its integral over is . Its flux is , which vanishes at both endpoints for . The scale shrinks to zero as , so the normalized solution has weak convergence of probability measures to the required unit source impulse. The mass at the boundary is a full unit impulse on the half-line, not half of a whole-line impulse.
For the integrated quantity, , and consequently
This verifies the printed location for horizontally integrated plume concentration. It is a maximum because the derivative changes from positive to negative there. The normalized profile is a gamma distribution with shape : its expected value is and its variance is , so neither the mean position nor the spread should be mistaken for the modal position.
The PDF changes from “integral” to “averaged” concentration in its final request. A genuine horizontally averaged plume concentration divides by the growing width , and is therefore
It is normalized by , not by . When , its interior maximum is
When it decreases from a finite boundary supremum; when it is singular at the ideal point source and has no positive interior maximum. A finite source regularizes that singularity. Thus the final printed maximum is correct for the integrated variable , or for an “average” using a fixed reference width, but is not generally the maximum of the local mean . Both quantities have been given rather than silently identifying them. If , the smooth similarity formula is replaced by the advected impulse ; positive eddy diffusivity is essential to the gamma profile.
Take the current to be dilute, vertically well mixed and Boussinesq approximation, with constant channel width , a horizontal absorbing bed, negligible ambient fluid entrainment, negligible bed friction, and no resuspension. The shallow-water approximation neglects vertical inertia and gives hydrostatic pressure. Particle loss alters reduced gravity but does not alter the leading-order carrier-fluid volume or inertia; otherwise additional mass and momentum terms would be necessary. The current occupies depth , has depth-uniform speed , and has particle volume fraction , with and constant .
Volume conservation of a short channel segment gives . Its suspended particle amount per unit bed area is , and the downward particle deposition flux is . Thus , which becomes on multiplying by .
At vertical coordinate above the bed, excess hydrostatic pressure divided by reference mass density is . Integrating across the depth gives the depth-integrated force flux . The horizontal momentum per unit bed area is and the advected kinematic momentum flux is . The resulting variable-buoyancy shallow water equations are
The derivative of the pressure term acts on both and ; treating reduced gravity as horizontally constant while particles settle would lose part of the force.
For a steady interior, let denote volume flux per unit width. Then the particle balance is a first-order linear differential equation,
Here , is constant, and deposited particles are not returned to the current. In particular the decay length is for , and the cancellation of depth follows from : dilution and transit time compensate in the deposition balance.
The steady momentum equation also gives
The inlet depth selects . Depth and speed at every downstream position are determined by the continuous positive root of a polynomial in
This implicit expression also makes clear why the inlet condition is needed: there are generally two possible positive depths.
The depth branches of a steady depositing gravity current are distinguished by the Froude number . Differentiating the momentum invariant, and using the exponential decay of reduced gravity, gives
For , supercritical flow has and decreasing depth, with and as . Subcritical flow has and increasing depth, with . This indefinitely deepening branch eventually violates the assumed shallow or confined-channel geometry. Hence the depth does not universally decrease: that conclusion needs a supercritical inlet.
For fixed , has its unique minimum at , with . The two positive roots when lie below and above . Since decreases downstream while is constant, an initially strict branch remains separate from the other branch and cannot cross a critical point. A critical inlet with has no finite depth derivative: at the first differentiated equation would equate zero to a positive value. It requires a singular entrance adjustment or physics beyond this steady model. If , both reduced gravity and the continuous depth branch are constant. These steady solutions describe the supplied current interior, not a moving finite-release front.
For two particle populations, write and , allowing different constant particle-density conversion factors. The bidisperse particle-laden gravity current equations are
For the steady case,
Thus the depth is obtained from the same cubic polynomial invariant with the sum of the two exponentially decreasing reduced gravity contributions.
The local deposit consists of the two particle deposition fluxes and . For a positive total deposition rate, the bidisperse gravity-current deposition fraction by particle volume is
If the particles have a common material density, this is also their local mass fraction. If they have common , it can be written in the source's buoyancy notation as
For unequal replace each by . The exponent sign matters: with both populations present and , the faster-settling population has decreasing local deposit fraction downstream, since . Equal positive settling speeds give a constant fraction. A nonsettling population contributes no deposit; if the entire local deposition rate is zero the deposit fraction is undefined.
If “fraction of particles” means number fraction rather than particle-volume or mass fraction, let be a single particle's volume in population . The correct weights are then , so
Settling speeds alone do not determine without particle properties and a drag law. Finally, if the intended deposit is cumulative over the bed from to , rather than local at , integrating particle deposition flux gives the species volumes per unit channel width . The cumulative particle-volume fraction is
For both , its limit at infinity is the incoming particle-volume fraction, whereas its limit as is the local deposition fraction at the inlet. Local sorting and the cumulative inventory are different observables.