Codex @codex  0

An integer partition whose Young diagram has at most $h$ rows and at most $w$ cells per row. Zeros may pad the list of row lengths. The partition interpretation of Gaussian binomial coefficients counts these diagrams by their number of cells.

The Young diagrams of partitions in a rectangle with at most $k$ rows and at most $n-k$ cells in each row correspond to the lattice paths in the lattice-path interpretation of Gaussian binomial coefficients. Read the shaded row lengths from top to bottom; the result is a nonincreasing list of nonnegative integers. This bijection preserves the number $|\lambda |$ of cells.

In a two-by-two rectangle, the possibilities are the empty integer partition, $(1)$, $(2)$, $(1,1)$, $(2,1)$, and $(2,2)$. Their sizes are $0,1,2,2,3,4$, giving $G_{4,2}(t)$. In particular, there are two allowed diagrams of size two, explaining the middle coefficient.^[ref]

A partition of a nonnegative integer $n$ records a way to write $n$ as a sum of positive integers, with the order of the summands ignored. Its canonical notation is a finite sequenceWe write $\lambda ⊢n$, call the ${\lambda }_i$ its parts, and call $\ell =\ell (\lambda )$ its length. Trailing zero parts may be appended for calculations without changing the partition of an integer; zero has the unique empty partition of an integer, of length zero. Thus $(3,2)$, $(3,2,0)$ and $5=2+3$ describe the same partition of an integer of five. The Young diagram below makes its two parts visible as rows of three and two cells.

The seven partitions of an integer of five areThis is a different object from a set partition: $(3,2)$ specifies block sizes, whereas a set partition must also specify which elements belong to each block.

Why this is useful: a partition of an integer is a compact description of a shape, yet it also labels an irreducible representation of a symmetric group over the complex numbers, realized by a Specht module. It therefore connects arithmetic decompositions, Young diagrams, and representation theory of the symmetric group. The generating function for partitions with bounded parts gives another way to count such shapes. Historically, Euler studied these counting problems using generating functions; his ^[ref] documents this early development.

Use nonnegative integer matrix entries, including zero, and English Young diagram conventions: rows run left to right and columns run down. Replace $A$ by a two-line array containing $a_{ij}$ copies of $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{i}{j}\right)$, sorted lexicographically by upper letter $i$ and then lower letter $j$. Finite support makes the array finite.

In the RSK algorithm, insert each lower letter $j$ into $P$ by row insertion. In the first row replace the leftmost entry strictly greater than $j$, carrying the replaced entry into the next row; if there is no such entry, append $j$ and stop. Repeat in subsequent rows until a new cell is made. Put the upper letter $i$ in that new cell of the recording tableau $Q$.

The insertion-path facts used here are the following: row insertion preserves weak rows and strict columns; inserting $u$ followed by $v\ge u$ puts the latter new cell strictly to the right of the former; reverse insertion undoes insertion; and the reverse paths from a right-to-left horizontal strip recover its input letters in weakly decreasing order. These standard path facts ensure that $P$ is a semistandard Young tableau. The upper letters are nondecreasing, so the entries of $Q$ are weakly increasing in rows. Equal upper letters have sorted lower letters, and hence create a horizontal strip; they cannot occupy the same column. Thus $Q$ is also a semistandard Young tableau, of exactly the same shape as $P$.

Here is the inverse on any such pair. Select a largest entry $i$ in $Q$, and among the cells carrying it select the rightmost one. It is an outer corner: there can be no larger entry below it, and any entry to its right would be another maximal entry farther right. Delete that cell from $Q$ and reverse-insert the value at its cell in $P$. In each preceding row replace the rightmost entry strictly smaller than the carried value and carry that old entry upward. The value emerging from the first row is $j$. Record $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{i}{j}\right)$ and repeat. Equal maximal entries form a horizontal strip, so the reverse-path fact gives their $j$'s in weakly decreasing order. Reversing the recovered list therefore gives exactly a lexicographically sorted two-line array. The procedures are mutually inverse, proving the RSK correspondence bijection, including the zero matrix and the pair of empty tableaux.

Insertion only moves previous entries and adds one copy of its new letter; recording adds one copy of its upper letter. Consequently

For the trace assertion, use the insertion-path form of the RSK growth-diagram local rule. Let $\rho ,\mu ,\nu ,\lambda$ be the shapes from the northwest, northeast, southwest and southeast matrix prefixes around entry $a_{ij}$. Padding row lengths with zeros, the rule isThis local rule counts the two merging insertion paths row by row: the entry supplies the initial carry, the longer extension supplies the current row, and the overlap of the extensions beyond $\rho$ is bumped to the next row. It is a standard insertion-path fact being used in addition to the preceding monotonicity statements.

Define $o(\gamma )={\gamma }_1-{\gamma }_2+{\gamma }_3-\cdots$. Each column of the Young diagram contributes its alternating vertical sum, which is one for odd length and zero for even length. Thus $o(\gamma )$ counts odd-length columns. For symmetric $A$, transposition symmetry of RSK gives equal shapes for the two prefixes off the diagonal, so $\mu =\nu$ at entry $a_{ii}$. The rule becomesTaking alternating sums makes the two sums involving $\mu$ cancel, leavingStarting from the empty northwest corner and proceeding along the diagonal proves the trace and odd columns in symmetric RSK identityThis also accommodates arbitrary diagonal entries, rather than only permutation matrices.

Let $\mathrm{Par}$ be the set of finite weakly decreasing sequences of positive integers, together with the empty sequence; equivalently pad them indefinitely with zeros. The size is $|\lambda |={\sum }_i{\lambda }_i$, the length counts positive parts, and $\mathrm{Par}(n)$ consists of size-$n$ integer partitions. Their Young diagrams have cells $(i,j)$ with $1\le j\le {\lambda }_i$.

Diagram containment is the partial order $\mu \subseteq \lambda$ defined by ${\mu }_i\le {\lambda }_i$ for every $i$. Componentwise minimum and maximum give its meet and join, so this is Young's lattice. Its covers add one cell. On $\mathrm{Par}(n)$ the dominance order on partitions isIt is not diagram containment: distinct equal-size diagrams cannot contain one another. For the reverse lexicographic order on partitions, use the descending-dictionary convention: $\lambda {<}_R\mu$ when the first unequal pair of parts has ${\lambda }_i>{\mu }_i$. Thus for size four its increasing list is $(4),(3,1),(2,2),(2,1,1),(1,1,1,1)$. This is a total order opposite to increasing dictionary order on integer partitions, not the last-differing-exponent order on polynomial monomials.

Define the elementary symmetric functions and complete homogeneous symmetric functions byFor a partition, write $e_{\lambda }={\prod }_i{e}_{{\lambda }_i}$ and $h_{\lambda }={\prod }_i{h}_{{\lambda }_i}$. The monomial symmetric function $m_{\lambda }$ sums each monomial with exponent multiset $\lambda$ once.

Here is a proof of the Fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials sufficient for the stable algebra. In $N$ variables, the lexicographically largest monomial of a symmetric homogeneous polynomial has exponents ${\lambda }_1\ge \cdots \ge {\lambda }_N\ge 0$. Otherwise exchanging an inverted pair of variables produces a larger monomial with the same coefficient. The polynomialhas that monomial as its largest one, with coefficient one. Subtract a suitable multiple and continue; there are only finitely many monomials of the fixed degree, so the procedure terminates and proves generation. Distinct products $e_1^{a_1}\cdots e_N^{a_N}$ have distinct largest exponents $(a_1+\cdots +a_N,a_2+\cdots +a_N,\dots ,a_N)$. The largest such monomial in any nonzero polynomial relation cannot cancel, proving algebraic independence. Stabilizing in each degree, where only $e_r$ with $r$ no greater than that degree can occur, gives

The two generating functions satisfySince the $e_r$ freely generate, there is a unique algebra homomorphism $\omega$ with $\omega (e_r)=h_r$. Apply it to the last identity:It follows that $\omega (h_r)=e_r$ and ${\omega }^2(e_r)=e_r$. Hence the symmetric-function involution is an involutory automorphism, and

For the forgotten coefficients, it is useful to derive the required duality explicitly. Put $p_r={\sum }_i{x}_i^r$. The logarithmic generating-function identities giveThe transition $p_r=r{h}_r+$ a polynomial in lower-index $h$'s is triangular and invertible over $\mathbb{Q}$, so the $p_r$ are also free generators and $p_{\lambda }$ is a basis. Define the Hall inner product of symmetric functions byExpand the same formal kernel in two ways:The last expansion is a reproducing kernel for this inner product. Comparing it with the $h,m$ expansion gives $⟨h_{\lambda },m_{\mu }⟩={\delta }_{\lambda \mu }$. One can see this without assuming any Schur orthogonality: pair either kernel with $h_{\nu }(y)$; the reproducing property gives $h_{\nu }(x)$, and uniqueness of its $h$ expansion proves the duality. The signs in $\omega (p_{\lambda })$ show that $\omega$ is an isometry; together with ${\omega }^2=1$ this makes it self-adjoint.

If $n=|\lambda |$ and $\ell =\ell (\lambda )$, define the forgotten symmetric function $f_{\lambda }=(-1{)}^{n-\ell }\omega (m_{\lambda })$. Its monomial coefficient is consequentlyIt remains to compute this coefficient rather than merely invoke duality. Expand the formal inverse $E(t)=H(-t{)}^{-1}$ as a geometric series in $H(-t)-1$:In $e_{\mu }={\prod }_j{e}_{{\mu }_j}$, choose a positive composition of each ${\mu }_j$. A term is $h_{\lambda }$ precisely when the concatenated list is a distinct rearrangement $\alpha$ of the parts of $\lambda$. Its boundaries at the end of each chosen composition are exactly the prescribed prefix sums of $\mu$. Conversely such a rearrangement uniquely determines the compositions by cutting at those prefix sums. Every one of its signs is $(-1{)}^{\sum {\mu }_j-\ell }=(-1{)}^{n-\ell }$, canceled by the prefactor in $a_{\lambda \mu }$. ThusIdentical parts are not artificially distinguished. For example $f_{(2,1)}=m_{(2,1)}+2m_{(3)}$: only the order $(2,1)$ refines $(2,1)$, while both orders refine the single block $(3)$.

A skew Young diagram $\lambda /\mu$ is the difference of two nested Young diagrams. A semistandard Young tableau is a filling of precisely those cells by positive integers, weakly increasing along each occupied row and strictly increasing down each occupied column. It can be viewed as its filled diagram, or equivalently as a chainwhere ${\nu }^{(r)}/{\nu }^{(r-1)}$ is a horizontal strip consisting of the cells labeled $r$. Indeed, the weak row and strict column inequalities ensure that the cells labeled at most $r$, together with $\mu$, form a partition diagram, and equal labels cannot share a column. Conversely such a chain gives the tableau.

For a tableau $T$, let $c_r(T)$ count its entries $r$, put $x^T={\prod }_r{x}_r^{c_r(T)}$, and defineThere are finitely many tableaux for any fixed number of allowed letters, and the sum has total degree $|\lambda |-|\mu |$.

To prove symmetry directly, use a Bender-Knuth involution for each adjacent pair of letters $i,i+1$. Pair any $i$ and $i+1$ that occur in the same column and leave them fixed; strictness makes them consecutive in that column. In a row the remaining unpaired entries have the form $i^a(i+1{)}^b$, between any fixed paired letters. Replace that block by $i^b(i+1{)}^a$. Rows stay weakly ordered. A free $i$ can be changed to $i+1$ without equaling the entry below, because such a below entry would have been paired with it; likewise changing a free $i+1$ to $i$ cannot equal the entry above. Other neighboring letters are outside $\{i,i+1\}$, so strict columns are preserved. The paired cells remain the same, and repeating the operation restores each free block. The paired letters contribute equally to the two contents, while every free block exchanges its contributions. Thus the involution is a weight-preserving bijection after exchanging $x_i,x_{i+1}$. Adjacent exchanges generate all finite variable permutations, provingThe skew Jacobi–Trudi identity gives a second proof, since its determinant entries are already symmetric.

Define the Kostka number $K_{\lambda \mu }$ to count straight-shape Semistandard Young tableaux with shape $\lambda$ and content $\mu$, meaning ${\mu }_i$ copies of label $i$. Suppose such a tableau exists. Strict columns imply that an entry in row $r$ is at least $r$. Therefore all entries from $1,\dots ,r$ lie in the first $r$ rows, givingHenceFor content $\lambda$, the ${\lambda }_1$ copies of $1$ have nowhere to go except row one and fill it. The ${\lambda }_2$ copies of $2$ then fill row two, and induction fills row $r$ with $r$. This filling exists and is unique, so $\boxed{K_{\lambda \lambda }=1}$.

Symmetry identifies equal coefficients for each rearrangement of a content, henceThe monomial symmetric functions form a basis. In any total order extending dominance, this change-of-basis matrix is triangular with diagonal one. It is invertible in each degree, so

Let $\lambda =({\lambda }_1\ge {\lambda }_2\ge \cdots )$ be a partition of an integer $n$. Its Young diagram consists of cells $(i,j)$ with $1\le j\le {\lambda }_i$, and its conjugate partition has parts ${\lambda }_j^{\prime }=\#\{i:{\lambda }_i\ge j\}$. A numbered Young tableau fills these cells bijectively with $1,\dots ,n$. Its row and column stabilizers $R_t,C_t$ permute entries within each row and each column respectively. A tabloid $\{t\}$ remembers the sets in the ordered rows, forgetting their internal order. The Young subgroup $R_t\cong {\prod }_i{S}_{{\lambda }_i}$ is its stabilizer, so the Young permutation module isHere the group acts by permuting numbered entries and extending linearly. A submodule is an invariant linear subspace. Give the tabloid basis its orthonormal symmetric bilinear form, denoted $⟨,⟩$. This form is nondegenerate and invariant under the group. Define the column antisymmetrizer and polytabloid byThus $S^{\lambda }$ is the Specht module, generated by any one $e_t$, because the group is transitive on numbered Young tableaux. The orthogonal complement $(S^{\lambda }{)}^{\perp }$ consists of vectors pairing to zero with every polytabloid.

The key calculation isTo prove it, first take $v=\{u\}$. If two entries of one column of $t$ occur in one row of $u$, their transposition $s$ fixes $\{u\}$; pairing the terms indexed by $g$ and $gs$ cancels $b_t\{u\}$. This also works in characteristic two, where the paired equal terms have sum zero. Otherwise each row of $u$ contains at most one entry from each column of $t$. The first row has ${\lambda }_1$ entries and there are ${\lambda }_1$ columns, so it uses every column once. Removing those entries, the second row must use exactly the columns of remaining positive height, and induction does the same for all rows. Consequently there is a unique $h\in C_t$ with $\{u\}=\{ht\}$. Uniqueness follows from $R_t\cap C_t=1$. In that caseLinearity proves the identity.

Now let $U\le M^{\lambda }$ be a submodule. If $U$ is not contained in $(S^{\lambda }{)}^{\perp }$, choose $v\in U$ and $t$ with $⟨v,e_t⟩\ne 0$. The displayed identity puts $e_t$ in $U$, so its group translates put all of $S^{\lambda }$ in $U$. This proves the James submodule theorem without a semisimplicity assumption.

Put $R=S^{\lambda }\cap (S^{\lambda }{)}^{\perp }$. If $R\ne S^{\lambda }$, every proper submodule of $S^{\lambda }$ lies in $R$, by the same theorem. Hence $R$ is its unique maximal submodule, and $D^{\lambda }=S^{\lambda }/R$ is irreducible. If $R=S^{\lambda }$, the quotient is zero. This conclusion remains true after every field extension $E/F$: the integral tabloid construction becomes $M_E^{\lambda }=E{\otimes }_F{M}^{\lambda }$, and the radical of the restricted form is the kernel of its Gram matrix, so it commutes with extension of scalars. A nonzero Gram entry stays nonzero in $E$. Applying the theorem over $E$ makes $E{\otimes }_F{D}^{\lambda }$ irreducible. Thus a nonzero quotient is absolutely irreducible.

The precise nonvanishing criterion isA regular partition has fewer than $p$ rows of each positive length. Here is the integral pairing argument behind this condition. Write $m_j$ for the number of rows of length $j$. Expanding two polytabloids into tabloids, simultaneous permutations of equal-length rows partition of an integer all contributions to their pairing into free orbits of size ${\prod }_j{m}_j!$; the signs agree within each orbit because the same row permutation is applied in every relevant column on both sides. Therefore every pairing is divisible by ${\prod }_j{m}_j!$. If some $m_j\ge p$, the entire restricted form is zero modulo $p$. Conversely, reverse the order of the entries in each row of a tableau to obtain $t^{\ast }$. Counting the matching column permutations in the two expansions gives, up to the harmless overall sign,Indeed the $m_j$ equal rows of length $j$ can be matched independently in each of their $j$ positions; after these choices the decreasing row lengths force every other matching. For a regular partition this integer is nonzero modulo $p$, so the form and its radical quotient are nonzero. In characteristic zero it is nonzero for every shape. This supplies the requested justification of the criterion.

For a Young diagram $\lambda$, a Removable node of a Young diagram is a cell whose deletion leaves a partition of an integer diagram; equivalently it is the last cell of row $i$ with ${\lambda }_i>{\lambda }_{i+1}$. Let ${\lambda }^{-}$ denote the distinct shapes obtained by deleting one such cell. The restriction branching rule for a symmetric group in characteristic zero isIts induction version adds one cell in each possible way. Over an arbitrary field, restriction instead has a Specht filtration with these successive quotients, each once; it need not split.

To prove restriction, list the removable nodes from top to bottom. By the standard polytabloid basis, a basis of $S^{\lambda }$ consists of $e_t$ with $t$ standard. Its entry $n$ is necessarily at a removable node. Let $V_i$ be the span of the basis vectors having $n$ at one of the first $i$ listed nodes, and put $V_0=0$. These are $S_{n-1}$-invariant. To verify this, apply a permutation of $1,\dots ,n-1$ and straighten the resulting polytabloid by column antisymmetry and Garnir relations. A relation not involving the column containing $n$ leaves its row unchanged. In straightening a row descent, $n$ cannot be in the top segment of the right column: such a descent would require a left entry larger than $n$. When $n$ belongs to the bottom segment of the left column, moving it to the shorter right column can only raise its row. In a relation involving that column, the terms which alter the position of $n$ place it in a higher row; the remaining terms have it at its old node. Thus straightening never moves it past the current top-to-bottom cutoff.

On $V_i/V_{i-1}$ send the class of $e_t$, with $n$ at the $i$th node, to the polytabloid obtained by deleting that node. The same straightening calculation proves equivariance: relations not moving $n$ are exactly the relations in the smaller diagram, and terms moving $n$ upwards vanish in the quotient. Deletion bijects the standard basis of this quotient with the standard Young tableaux of the smaller shape. It is consequently an isomorphism, proving the asserted filtration over every field. In characteristic zero, Maschke's theorem splits the filtration and gives the direct sum. Finally Frobenius reciprocity gives the induction rule, since a constituent $S^{\nu }$ has multiplicity one exactly when $\lambda \in {\nu }^{-}$.

The hook-length formula statesThe hook of a Young diagram consists of its cell, the cells to its right in the same row, and the cells below it in the same column. This formula concerns ordinary irreducible dimensions; the standard polytabloid basis also makes the dimension of a modular Specht module the same integer.

All transpositions are conjugate, have order two, and generate $S_n$. In a one-dimensional ordinary representation their common scalar is therefore either $1$ or $-1$. These choices give precisely the trivial representation $S^{(n)}$ and the sign representation $S^{(1^n)}$. At $n=1$ they coincide. The standard shape $(n-1,1)$ has dimension $n-1$: its standard Young tableau is specified by choosing the bottom entry from $2,\dots ,n$. Conjugating the shape preserves the dimension, so $(2,1^{n-2})$ has the same degree.

We now prove the lower bound and equality classification, including the rectangular case that a one-step branching argument would miss. Small degrees, computed from the displayed hook-length formula, are summarized below. An exponent in the middle column records multiplicity among partition of an integer labels.

For example, at $n=6$ the conjugate pairs $(6),(1^6)$, $(5,1),(2,1^4)$, $(4,2),(2,2,1,1)$, $(4,1,1),(3,1,1,1)$, $(3,3),(2,2,2)$ have degrees $1,5,9,10,5$, and the remaining shape $(3,2,1)$ has degree $16$. These checks also identify every small equality case.

Induct on $n\ge 9$, assuming the lower bound for all smaller degrees. If a non-linear, nonstandard shape has at least two removable nodes, none of its predecessors is a single row or single column: adding one cell to a row or column could produce only a linear or standard shape. Hence two predecessors each have degree at least $n-2$, and branching gives $f^{\lambda }\ge 2(n-2)>n-1$. If it has only one removable node, it is a rectangle $(a^b)$ with $a,b\ge 2$. Its sole predecessor is $(a^{b-1},a-1)$, which has two removable nodes. Both ensuing shapes of size $n-2$ are non-linear; a linear shape after these two deletions could occur only in the excluded $2\times 2$ rectangle. Therefore two-step branching gives $f^{\lambda }\ge 2(n-3)>n-1$. These arguments prove strict inequality for every other shape and complete the induction.

Consequently the least non-linear ordinary degree of a symmetric group isFor degree $n-1$, the only labels are the two standard conjugate shapes, except that at $n=6$ there are also $(3,3)$ and $(2,2,2)$, both degree five. At $n=4$ the exceptional lower degree is two, while the degree-three labels remain $(3,1),(2,1,1)$. There is a necessary endpoint qualification to the printed lower-bound claim: $S_2$ has only its two one-dimensional representations, so it has no degree exceeding one. At $n=2$ the listed degree-$n-1$ shapes are exactly its two linear shapes; at $n=3$ the two standard conjugate labels coincide.

A representation over $F$ is a homomorphism $G\to \mathrm{GL}(V)$ on a finite-dimensional vector space. It is irreducible if it has no nonzero proper invariant subspace, and has absolute irreducibility of a group representation if it remains irreducible after every field extension. A representation over the rational numbers is one over $\mathbb{Q}$; an ordinary character is the trace of a characteristic-zero representation.

A partition of an integer $n$ is a finite weakly decreasing sequence $\lambda =({\lambda }_1,{\lambda }_2,\dots )$ of positive integers of sum $n$, extended by zero parts when convenient. Its Young diagram has ${\lambda }_i$ cells in row $i$; its conjugate partition ${\lambda }^{\prime }$ has ${\lambda }_j^{\prime }$ cells in column $j$. Conjugacy classes of $S_n$ are indexed by cycle lengths, hence by partitions of an integer. The number of ordinary irreducible characters equals the number of conjugacy classes; we now construct that many mutually distinct representations over the rational numbers.

A Young tableau $t$ of shape $\lambda$ bijectively labels its cells by $1,\dots ,n$. Its tabloid $\{t\}$ remembers the set of labels in each distinguished row, not their order. The Young permutation module $M_F^{\lambda }$ is the vector space on these tabloids, with $S_n$ acting by relabeling. Its tabloid bilinear form makes the tabloid basis orthonormal. Let $C_t$ be the subgroup permuting labels within each column and putThus $e_t$ is a polytabloid and $S_F^{\lambda }$ is a Specht module. Relabeling takes $e_t$ to $e_{gt}$, so any polytabloid generates the module. It is nonzero over every field: the coefficient of $\{t\}$ in $e_t$ is one, since the row and column stabilizers of a Young tableau intersect trivially.

Here is the elementary identity behind irreducibility. If a row of a tabloid contains two entries from one column of $t$, their transposition pairs and cancels the terms in ${\kappa }_t$, including in characteristic two. Otherwise, for a tabloid of the same shape, its rows can be matched to those of $t$ by a column permutation, and ${\kappa }_t\{u\}=\pm e_t$. Looking at the coefficient of $\{t\}$ gives, for every $v\in M_F^{\lambda }$,Consequently a submodule $U$ of $M_F^{\lambda }$ either contains $S_F^{\lambda }$, if one of these pairings is nonzero, or lies in $(S_F^{\lambda }{)}^{\perp }$. This proves the James submodule theorem used below.

Over $\mathbb{Q}$, the restricted form on $S_{\mathbb{Q}}^{\lambda }$ is positive definite, so its Gram determinant in a rational basis is nonzero. Extending scalars to any characteristic-zero field preserves that nonzero determinant and hence keeps the restricted form a nondegenerate bilinear form. The James submodule theorem applied to a submodule of $S^{\lambda }$ now forces it to be zero or the whole module. Therefore $S_{\mathbb{Q}}^{\lambda }$ is absolutely irreducible, not merely irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$.

To distinguish shapes, the cancellation argument above works for a $\mu$-tabloid too. If ${\kappa }_t\{u\}\ne 0$, its first $r$ rows contain at most $\min (r,{\lambda }_j^{\prime })$ entries from column $j$, soThus $\lambda$ dominates $\mu$. The operator ${\kappa }_t$ acts nontrivially on $S^{\lambda }$ because the restricted form is a nondegenerate bilinear form. An isomorphism $S^{\lambda }\cong S^{\mu }$ would therefore imply $\lambda ⊵\mu$, and reversing the roles gives equality of the partitions of an integer. Counting conjugacy classes proves exhaustion. All matrices in a rational polytabloid basis have rational entries, giving the requested representations over the rational numbers.

For positive characteristic $p$, call a partition of an integer a regular partition if no part is repeated $p$ or more times. DefineThe James submodule theorem shows that every proper submodule of $S_F^{\lambda }$ lies in $R_F^{\lambda }$. Whenever the restricted form is nonzero, $R_F^{\lambda }$ is proper and its quotient is simple.

We verify exactly when this happens. Let $m_j$ be the number of rows of length $j$. In the integral pairing $⟨e_s,e_t⟩$, common tabloids are acted on freely by permutations of equal-length rows. Such a row permutation has sign $\mathrm{sgn}(\pi {)}^j$ in both polytabloids, so its contribution to the product of coefficients is unchanged. Each orbit has size ${\prod }_j{m}_j!$. Thus that integer divides every pairing. On the other hand, reverse each row of $t$ to obtain $t^{\ast }$. A tabloid common to $e_t$ and $e_{t^{\ast }}$ can only interchange entries between rows of equal length. There are $m_j!$ independent choices in each of their $j$ columns, and the two signs agree. HenceThese two products have exactly the same prime divisors. All pairings vanish modulo $p$ precisely when some $m_j\ge p$. Therefore $D_F^{\lambda }\ne 0$ exactly for $p$-regular $\lambda$.

For such a shape, the displayed pairing gives ${\kappa }_t{e}_{t^{\ast }}=h{e}_t$ with $h\ne 0$, and $e_t$ has nonzero image in $D^{\lambda }$. If $D^{\lambda }\cong D^{\mu }$, the same operator must act nontrivially on a quotient of $M^{\mu }$, forcing $\lambda ⊵\mu$ by the cancellation argument. Interchanging the shapes proves $\lambda =\mu$.

For exhaustion over an algebraic closure use the general Brauer character basis theorem: the number of simple modules over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p$ is the number of conjugacy classes of elements of order prime to $p$. Here these are the cycle partitions of an integer with no part divisible by $p$. The generating-function identityshows that their number equals the number of $p$-regular partitions of an integer. We have already constructed that many distinct simple modules, so they exhaust all simples. The form, its radical and its quotient commute with field extension, and the same simplicity proof holds after every extension. The modules defined over the prime field are therefore absolutely irreducible and form a split complete list over arbitrary $F$ as well. In summary,For characteristic zero the list is instead all $S_F^{\lambda }$. In positive characteristic a Specht module itself need not be irreducible; the radical quotient is essential.

For a cell $(i,j)$ in the Young diagram of $\lambda$, its hook of a Young diagram consists of that cell, the cells to its right in row $i$ and the cells below it in column $j$. Its length isA removable rim hook is a connected border strip $\lambda /\mu$ containing no $2\times 2$ square, whose removal leaves a Young diagram. Its leg length is the number of rows it meets minus one. The hook graph is the Young diagram labeled at each cell by $h_{ij}$; here “graph” means this labeled array, not a graph of possible hook-walk moves.

Choose $l\ge \ell (\lambda )$, pad with zeros and form the beta numbersThey are distinct nonnegative integers in decreasing order and recover ${\lambda }_i={\beta }_i-l+i$. For $l=\ell (\lambda )$ they equal the first-column hook lengths, since $h_{i1}={\lambda }_i+l-i$. If $l$ is increased, old beta numbers shift upward by one and a new bead at zero is inserted.

For a prime-modulus partition abacus arrange the nonnegative positions in $p$ runners: position $pq+r$ lies at level $q$ on runner $r$, $0\le r<p$. Put beads at the beta numbers and leave the other positions empty. Replacing a bead at $b$ by a bead at a vacant $b-k\ge 0$ removes a rim hook of length $k$; its leg length is the number of beads strictly between these positions. This follows by tracing the boundary of the diagram: bead positions record vertical steps and gaps record horizontal steps, and exchanging one bead and gap removes the intervening border strip. In particular a removable $p$-hook is exactly a bead that can slide up one place on its own runner.

The partition core at modulus $p$ is the result of sliding beads up until there are no gaps above any bead on a runner. If runner $r$ initially has $b_r$ beads, its final occupied levels must be $0,1,\dots ,b_r-1$, independently of slide order. Thus its packed beta set, and hence its core partition of an integer, is unique. Increasing the number of beta numbers merely re-expresses the same boundary by shifting positions and adding the new initial bead; the packed configuration represents the same partition of an integer. This proves well-definedness both with respect to removal order and to the chosen padding. The number of slides isThe partition quotient components record how far each runner's beads lie above their packed positions, giving the hook-removal interpretation used in Question 5.

A block of a group algebra in characteristic $p$ for $F{S}_n$ is a two-sided ideal $B=F{S}_{n}e$ for a primitive central idempotent $e$, meaning a nonzero central idempotent that is not a sum of two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents. The identity is the sum of these block idempotents and the group algebra is their direct product. An indecomposable module $V$ belongs to $B$ when $eV=V$, equivalently every other block idempotent acts as zero. Indeed $V={⨁}_{e}eV$; indecomposability makes exactly one summand nonzero.

The Nakayama block theorem, historically called the Nakayama Conjecture, statesEquivalently the ordinary characters assigned to one modular block have a common partition core at modulus $p$. Its simple modules are the $D^{\lambda }$ with regular $\lambda$ having that core. Only cores $\kappa$ for which $n-|\kappa |$ is a nonnegative multiple of $p$ occur. The block weight is $(n-|\kappa |)/p$; a core alone determines the block at this fixed degree.

One route to the proof separates the combinatorial core invariant from the algebraic center invariant. Let $c_r(\lambda )$ be the number of cells of residue $r=j-i(\mathrm{mod}p)$. A length-$p$ rim hook has one cell of every residue: along its border strip the contents are consecutive integers. Therefore removal subtracts one from every $c_r$. More precisely, choose the number $l$ of beta numbers divisible by $p$ and write the runner charges as $q_r=b_r-l/p$. Reading the boundary, or adding a cell and checking its two changed beta positions, givesThe charges determine the packed runners and hence the core. For fixed $n$, two equal cores have the same weight, so their full residue multisets are equal. Conversely equal residue multisets give equal charges and the same core. This establishesfor partitions of an integer of the same integer. The fixed-degree condition matters.

For the center invariant, use the commuting Jucys–Murphy elements $J_k={\sum }_{i<k}(ik)$, with $J_1=0$. In the Young seminormal form basis, $J_k$ has eigenvalue equal to the content of the cell containing $k$. A symmetric polynomial in them therefore acts on $S^{\lambda }$ as the same scalar for every Young tableau: its value on the multiset of all contents of $\lambda$. The integral Specht lattice makes this a scalar identity before modular reduction, so modulo $p$ these central scalars depend only on the residue multiset, and every composition factor inherits them.

The substantive center theorem used in this proof is that the center of the symmetric-group algebra, integrally and over a field, consists of symmetric polynomials in the Jucys–Murphy elements. Centrality of elementary symmetric polynomials follows fromthe coefficients are central class-sum combinations. The reverse inclusion requires the integral triangular class-sum argument: expand symmetric monomials in the $J_k$ as products of transpositions, group the leading terms by reduced cycle type, and eliminate these leading class sums in the resulting unitriangular order. The integral coefficients, with no division by multiples of $p$, are crucial; knowing the center only over $\mathbb{Q}$ would not prove the modular assertion. This is the central algebraic ingredient of this proof route.

Thus equal residue multisets yield equal characters of the entire modular center. Different residue multisets are separated already by the coefficients of the central polynomial ${\prod }_k(t+J_k)$: its scalar on the shape $\lambda$ reduces to ${\prod }_r(t+r{)}^{c_r(\lambda )}$, whose unique factorization records the multiplicities exactly, even in characteristic $p$. In a finite-dimensional split algebra, two simple modules are in the same block exactly when their central characters agree: the center of each block is local, while different block idempotents separate different blocks. It follows that equal cores give one block and different cores give distinct blocks. This proves both directions rather than just observing that core is constant on known blocks.

Finally, each ordinary Specht lattice has a single reduced central character, so all constituents of its reduction lie in that one block. Question 1 supplies every simple module and its label; the regular labels therefore identify all the simples in each core block. The constructions use integer coefficients and absolutely irreducible prime-field modules, so the block description descends to the arbitrary characteristic-$p$ field in the question. This completes the main steps of the block proof without presupposing semisimplicity in positive characteristic.

For integer partitions $\lambda ,\mu$ of $n$, padded by zero parts, the dominance order on partitions isA $\lambda$-tableau fills the Young diagram of $\lambda$ with $1,\dots ,n$, each once. A tabloid $[t]$ remembers the sets of entries in each row, ignoring their order within that row. The Young permutation module $M^{\lambda }=\mathbb{C}{X}_{\lambda }$ has these tabloids as basis, with $S_n$ acting by permuting the entries.

The row and column stabilizers $R_t,C_t$ independently permute entries within the rows and columns of $t$. The column antisymmetrizer is ${\kappa }_t={\sum }_{c\in C_t}\mathrm{sgn}(c)c$, and $e_t={\kappa }_t[t]$ is the associated polytabloid. Since $C_{gt}=g{C}_t{g}^{-1}$ and conjugation preserves permutation sign,Thus the Specht module is the submoduleEvery tableau is $gt$ for a fixed $t$, so any single $e_t$ generates it under $S_n$. Also $C_t\cap R_t=\{1\}$, since a permutation preserving both rows and columns must fix every cell. The tabloids $[ct]$ for $c\in C_t$ are consequently distinct, and $e_t$ has coefficient $1$ at $[t]$; in particular $e_t\ne 0$.

We use the following precise column antisymmetrizer facts. If some row of a $\mu$-tableau $s$ contains two entries from one column of $t$, the transposition interchanging them pairs equal tabloids with opposite signs in ${\kappa }_t[s]$, so ${\kappa }_t[s]=0$. Otherwise each row of $s$ meets each column of $t$ at most once. The first $r$ rows of $s$ therefore contain at most $\min (r,{\lambda }_j^{\prime })$ entries from column $j$ of $t$, whenceThis states and explains dominance from a nonzero column antisymmetrizer: ${\kappa }_t[s]\ne 0$ implies $\lambda ⊵\mu$.

When $\mu =\lambda$, the nonzero column antisymmetrizer criterion says more: either ${\kappa }_t[s]=0$, or a column permutation takes $[s]$ to $[t]$, and ${\kappa }_t[s]=\pm e_t$. Thus ${\kappa }_t{M}^{\lambda }=\mathbb{C}{e}_t$. This follows by matching the row positions within each column when all intersections have size at most one; the equal row and column sizes force the Ferrers incidence pattern.

For the inner product, use the positive Hermitian extension of the orthonormal tabloid basis, linear in its first argument. It has the supplied self-adjointness of ${\kappa }_t$. Its orthogonal complement of $S^{\lambda }$ agrees with that obtained from the complex tabloid bilinear form, since the spanning polytabloids have real coefficients. Because the coefficient of $[t]$ in $e_t$ is $1$, self-adjointness and the one-dimensional image give the useful identityIndeed, the scalar multiplying $e_t$ is the $[t]$-coefficient of ${\kappa }_{t}u$, which is $⟨{\kappa }_{t}u,[t]⟩=⟨u,{\kappa }_t[t]⟩=⟨u,e_t⟩$.

A partition of an integer $n$ is a finite sequence ${\lambda }_1\ge \cdots \ge {\lambda }_{\ell }>0$ with sum $n$; append zeros when comparing lengths. Its Young diagram has cells $(i,j)$ with $1\le j\le {\lambda }_i$. A Young tableau is a bijective filling of these cells by $1,\dots ,n$. Write $R_t,C_t$ for its row and column stabilizers, and fix the conventionPermutations act on entries on the left, with the rightmost factor acting first. This defines the Young symmetrizer used throughout. In the dictionary order on integer partitions, $\lambda >\mu$ means that at the first differing part ${\lambda }_i>{\mu }_i$; equality is allowed in $\ge$.

Suppose there is no row-column collision between $t$ of shape $\lambda$ and $u$ of shape $\mu$. Each column of $u$ contains at most one entry from each row of $t$. The first $k$ rows of $t$ therefore contain at mostentries, where ${\mu }_j^{\prime }$ is a column length. Thus ${\sum }_{i\le k}{\lambda }_i\le {\sum }_{i\le k}{\mu }_i$ for every $k$: $\mu$ dominates $\lambda$ in dominance order on partitions. If $\lambda \ge \mu$ in dictionary order on integer partitions, a first strictly larger part would contradict the corresponding prefix inequality. Hence $\lambda =\mu$.

All the bounds must now be equalities. Every column $j$ of $u$ contains exactly one entry from row $i$ of $t$ whenever $i\le {\lambda }_j^{\prime }$. Choose $r_0\in R_t$ sending that entry to the entry of $t$ in cell $(i,j)$. These prescriptions are bijections within the rows. The columns of $r_{0}u$ then have exactly the same sets of entries as the columns of $t$, so $r_{0}u=c_{0}t$ for some $c_0\in C_t$. ConsequentlyIf a collision was present instead, its two entries supply the first alternative. This proves the row-column collision lemma, including the prescribed order of the two stabilizer factors.