Use the normalized eigenstates from part (ii). The quantum state found in part (iii) has the decomposition
There is no component. Equivalently, its inner product with contains . The Born rule therefore gives
For completeness the only outcomes are , each with probability . Thus does not mean that zero is a possible result in this state: its quantum uncertainty in is , even though is exactly zero.
Recover from the given angular momentum raising operator and angular momentum lowering operator:
This is the generator of rotations about the first coordinate axis. A natural candidate is the angular function pointing along that axis, . Direct substitution gives
Also , so linearity and part (ii) give . Thus an answer is . Its squared norm on the sphere is
so the normalized quantum state is
The supplied starting state gives an alternative derivation with a changed quantization axis. Put and . The angular momentum commutation relations give and , so raises the projection from to zero. Direct differentiation gives
which is nonzero and proportional to the same . This also connects the construction directly to the given state.
Starting from , part (i) gives and . Apply the angular momentum raising operator explicitly:
A second application gives
Since commutes with , both raised functions retain the eigenvalue . Their eigenvalues follow either by differentiating their dependence or from . Thus three valid unnormalized functions, in the requested order, are
For later Born rule calculations, normalize with the solid angle measure . Their squared norms are , , , respectively. For example and . A convenient orthonormal basis is therefore
Orthogonality follows from the distinct Fourier factors in . An overall phase of each basis function is arbitrary; these choices need not impose the usual phase convention for the spherical harmonics.
Put . For the regular, single-valued orbital angular momentum states, is a nonnegative integer. Differentiation immediately gives
For , the derivatives needed for are
Consequently the angular differential expression inside the parentheses of equals
using . Therefore
The expressions extend regularly through the polar coordinate singularities: is the restriction of the polynomial to the unit sphere. It is proportional to the lowest-projection spherical harmonic of degree ; for it is the constant state.
Write , and . Its derivative is
Integration by parts with the Dirichlet boundary conditions gives the energy expectation
It is constant in time, since the time-independent Hamiltonian operator has fixed energy measurement probabilities: .
For the midpoint parity operator, . Hence, again putting ,
Indeed the imaginary part integrates to zero by reflection and . This expectation value is also constant in time, because the bounded self-adjoint operator commutes with and hence with its time-evolution operator. Equivalently, .
For the momentum operator, direct evaluation gives
The real sine-cosine integral vanishes. This expectation value is not constant in time: the infinite square well walls reverse motion. One can prove the change exactly without approximating the wavefunction. At
the energy eigenstate expansion and give . Differentiation shows , so
This half revival in an infinite square well is a concrete counterexample to momentum conservation. The sign from is only a global phase.
Figure 1.
The box state at and : identical position probability density, opposite probability current
. Analytic curves in dimensionless coordinates; arrows indicate the current direction. The integrated current gives , so the reversed currents have opposite mean momentum. Details.
The apparent interior identity cannot justify conservation here: the momentum operator does not preserve the Dirichlet boundary conditions of the Hamiltonian operator's operator domain. For sufficiently regular states, retaining the boundary terms in Ehrenfest theorem instead gives the boundary force in an infinite square well,
In the strictly confined interval, with both endpoint values zero is symmetric but not itself a self-adjoint operator. The requested integral is the conventional mean momentum; it also equals the full-line momentum mean of the zero-extended state, as measured upon releasing the walls. This domain distinction explains why the formal interior commutator misses the wall force.
The requested energy eigenvalue is . By the Born rule, its probability amplitude is the inner product . Put and use :
The first integral is ; the second is zero under . Therefore
For the time-independent Hamiltonian operator, expand in its orthonormal basis of energy eigenstates:
Unitary time evolution changes to , whose modulus is unchanged. Thus the same energy measurement probability holds at every time, even though relative quantum phases and other measurements can change.
The spatial quantum phase has unit modulus. Thus the probability density and total probability are
The exterior contributes zero. This establishes wavefunction normalization, although the spatial quantum phase means the state is not the ground energy eigenstate.
The operator is the midpoint parity operator about . The angle-subtraction identity gives
Consequently . The sine functions form a complete orthonormal basis of , so the simultaneous diagonal action implies commutation on the Hamiltonian operator's operator domain. More directly, preserves the Dirichlet boundary conditions and ; hence whenever is defined. This checks the domain as well as the differential expressions.
For arbitrary , use in the inner product:
Also , so is bounded and defined everywhere. The identity therefore proves , with no extra domain restriction. In particular is a self-adjoint operator; also makes it a unitary operator.
Inside the infinite square well, the Schrödinger equation and Dirichlet boundary conditions are
The wavefunction vanishes outside the box. These walls constrain its values, not its first derivatives: requiring both to vanish at an endpoint would eliminate all the nonzero stationary solutions.
For a nonzero separated solution, separation of variables gives
The last equation is the time-independent Schrödinger equation. Its energy eigenvalue is real. Multiplication by and integration by parts, with the endpoint values zero, gives
Equality would force to be constant and hence zero, so a nonzero energy eigenstate has . Writing , the general solution is . The left wall gives ; the right gives . Negative integers reproduce the same functions up to a constant, and gives the zero function, leaving for .
Finally . Thus wavefunction normalization with positive coefficient gives
An arbitrary constant global phase has no effect on the quantum state.
Twice applying the creation operator or twice applying the annihilation operator changes the energy eigenvalue by , unless they give zero. The same orthogonality argument as in part (i) therefore gives
Also the factorization in part (a) gives
Now and . Squaring in the correct operator order yields
By part (i), the means are zero, so these are the variances. Taking positive square roots gives the requested standard deviations:
These harmonic-oscillator number-state second moments also show equal mean kinetic energy and potential energy, each . Their uncertainty product is , so the ground state saturates the Heisenberg uncertainty relation.
If , it has energy , distinct from the energy of . Eigenstates of a self-adjoint operator with distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal. Explicitly,
so . If , the same conclusion is immediate.
Dividing by and using the definition of gives
Both expectation values are real because and are self-adjoint operators. Its real and imaginary parts therefore vanish separately:
An oscillator energy eigenstate is centered in both position and momentum, despite having nonzero quantum uncertainties.
Let have energy and put . The lowering norm formula gives, inductively,
In particular is a nonzero ground state. By the assumed nondegeneracy, it equals for some .
It remains to show that raising this vector recovers , rather than merely another state at the same energy. On an energy eigenstate at , factorization gives . Iterating the factorization down the ladder yields
Applying to therefore proves
For this is the original ground-state assumption. This proves nondegeneracy propagated by an oscillator ladder: every energy eigenspace is one-dimensional if the ground state is nondegenerate.
Write . Repeated application of the annihilation operator lowers the energy eigenvalue in steps of . The lower bound from part (ii) forces this process to stop. To see why it also quantizes the starting energy, write
The first lowering steps have positive squared norms. If , the next step is also nonzero by part (ii), and its energy would be , contradicting the bound. Thus , and
Existence of the ground state can also be checked directly in the position representation. The equation is
whose solution is proportional to . This Gaussian function is square-integrable, so it gives an actual ground state. Its normalization can be chosen using the Gaussian integral.
All the displayed levels occur: for a nonzero state at ,
Thus repeated raising creates a nonzero energy eigenstate at every .
The squared norm is obtained by moving the adjoint operator to the other side of the inner product:
For an energy eigenstate, this is
Since a squared norm is nonnegative, every nonzero energy eigenstate has . Moreover exactly when .
From and the commutator product rule,
Consequently, if ,
Thus the creation operator raises the energy eigenvalue by , and the annihilation operator lowers it by , provided the resulting vector is nonzero. The zero vector is not an eigenstate; in particular the ground state will be annihilated by . The displayed operator identity holds even in that case.
Write . On the first tangent branch, , the matching relations are equivalent to
The function is continuous and strictly increasing there:
The intermediate value theorem therefore gives a unique first-branch root for every . At this root and , so the energy eigenvalue
obeys . This proves the even bound state in every attractive square well result.
Figure 1.
Even-state matching in a finite square well: the rising tangent branch meets the decaying circle for shallow and deeper wells
. Details.
To verify all the requested properties, take the resulting even wavefunction with exterior tails written in terms of their boundary values:
The matching equation makes both the values and first derivatives agree at the endpoints. The exterior tails are square-integrable because , and the interior interval is finite. More explicitly,
so choosing as the positive inverse square root of the bracket gives wavefunction normalization. Thus an even, continuously differentiable, normalizable stationary solution always exists, however small the positive depth.
At a finite jump in potential energy, the wavefunction and its first derivative must be continuous. A jump in the derivative would create a Dirac delta function in , for which the finite potential has no balancing term. For the even solution, matching at gives
A nonzero solution cannot have . It also cannot have : the first condition would give , while the second would force , a contradiction. Division is therefore valid and yields
Parity makes the conditions at identical to those already imposed. Finally the definitions of the decay and oscillation constants give
The circle relation fixes the well strength; the tangent relation selects its even bound states.
For an even function, the interior sine term must vanish, because sine is odd and cosine is even. Comparing reflected exterior tails at any gives . Hence the parity condition alone is
It does not yet impose the matching condition on . Continuity at , when imposed in the next part, additionally gives .
In either exterior region of the finite square well, the time-independent Schrödinger equation reduces to , since . Its general solution is a linear combination of and . On the left, grows as and cannot be a square-integrable function, so its coefficient must be zero. On the right, the excluded growing term is . Hence the surviving tails are for and for .
Inside the well, and the equation becomes , whose general solution is . Thus
The coefficients are initially independent; wavefunction matching at a finite potential step imposes the remaining relations. Here the paper's is the exterior decay constant and is the interior oscillation constant.
By linearity of the time-independent Schrödinger equation, the even and odd parts
each satisfy the same energy eigenvalue equation whenever they are nonzero. They obey and , so they have definite parity. At least one is nonzero, and . Each nonzero part can be normalized separately.
Therefore a basis of stationary solutions can be chosen to have definite parity, and solving the even and odd sectors loses no energy eigenvalues. This does not assert that every possible quantum superposition has definite parity; a superposition of the two sectors need not. For one-dimensional bound states in the usual regular setting, nondegeneracy of one-dimensional bound states further implies that each individual energy eigenstate has definite parity.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact