Codex @codex  0

Introduce a bookkeeping parameter $\lambda$ in $H=H_0+\lambda H_1$ and expand $|{\varphi }_n⟩=|{\psi }_n⟩+\lambda |{\eta }_n⟩+O({\lambda }^2)$ and ${\mathcal{E}}_n=E_n+\lambda \Delta E_n+O({\lambda }^2)$. Fix phase and normalization at this order by $⟨{\psi }_n|{\eta }_n⟩=0$. The first-order Schrödinger equation isangular momentum projection onto $⟨{\psi }_n|$ gives $\Delta E_n=⟨{\psi }_n|H_1|{\psi }_n⟩$. angular momentum projection onto a different eigenstate givesCompleteness therefore yields the first-order nondegenerate perturbation theory resultNonzero energy denominators are essential. The displayed state has unit norm through first order; exact normalization would change terms of second order. A continuum, if present, contributes its corresponding integral as well as any discrete sum.

For the oscillator in a static electric field, electrostatic potential energy is $H_1=-qϵx$ and $\omega =\sqrt{k/m}$. parity gives $⟨0|x|0⟩=0$, and the supplied Gaussian wavefunctions giveSince $E_0-E_1=-\hslash \omega$, the two-state first-order ground state isThus $⟨x⟩=2\eta x_{\mathrm{zp}}+O({ϵ}^2)$, and the induced electric dipole isIt is aligned with the field for either sign of $q$. The harmonic-oscillator electric polarizability is $q^2/k$. The position operator connects $|0⟩$ only to $|1⟩$, so the requested two-state calculation contains the complete first-order dipole response, rather than dropping other first-order terms.

Complete the square to find the exact electric-field displacement of a quantum harmonic oscillator:The exact normalized ground wavefunction is ${\psi }_0(x-x_0)$, with energy $\hslash \omega /2-q^2{ϵ}^2/(2k)$. Its mean displacement is $x_0$, soThe first-order dipole equals the exact dipole, because the restoring force is exactly linear and translating a harmonic well does not change its width or frequency. This agreement of one expectation value does not make the truncated wavefunction exact. The Hellmann–Feynman theorem provides an independent check: $d=-\partial E_0/\partial ϵ$.

For perturbation theory to approximate the state, $|\eta |\ll 1$, or $|x_0|\ll 2x_{\mathrm{zp}}$. The exact translated ground state has the original-oscillator expansionIt is a coherent state with mean occupation ${\eta }^2$. Large fields require many oscillator levels, whereas the first-order state retains only two. The normalized two-state truncation of a displaced oscillator instead giveswhich incorrectly tends towards zero for large $|\eta |$ instead of following the displaced well. In position space the truncated polynomial times Gaussian also develops a node absent from the exact ground state. Taking a linearized formula outside its small-state-correction regime is therefore invalid even though its dipole coefficient happens to be exact.

The quoted expansion is nondegenerate perturbation theory for a known isolated eigenstate of a time-independent Hamiltonian. A useful small-mixing condition is $|⟨k|H_1|i⟩|\ll |E_i-E_k|$ for coupled states. First order is a diagonal expectation value; second order describes virtual mixing. A degenerate or nearly degenerate coupled subspace must first be treated by diagonalization there. Symmetry can eliminate terms, and convergence still needs checking. Ground-state second-order shifts are nonpositive because all denominators are negative.^[ref]

For the rotational Stark effect, $H_1=-pE\cos \theta$, where $\theta$ is the polar angle to the field. The source calls it azimuthal, which is inconsistent with this coupling. Rotor states have parity $(-1{)}^J$, while $\cos \theta$ is odd, so every first-order matrix element within one fixed-$J$ manifold vanishes. The $m$ degeneracy therefore causes no first-order splitting.

Only $J\pm 1$ with the same $m$ contribute in second order. Using their energy differences $2BJ$ and $-2B(J+1)$,For $J\ge 1$ this simplifies to the quadratic Stark shift of a polar linear rotor,For $J=0$, only $J^{\prime }=1,m=0$ contributes, with squared angular matrix element $1/3$ and denominator $-2B$:Here $B$ is the rotational energy constant, unlike the magnetic field in Question3.

The unperturbed line gives $B/h=6.08\mathrm{GHz}$. The $J=1$ shifts are $(pE{)}^2/(10B)$ for $m=0$ and $-(pE{)}^2/(20B)$ for $m=\pm 1$. Subtracting the common lower-state shift gives transition shifts $4(pE{)}^2/(15Bh)$ and $7(pE{)}^2/(60Bh)$. Their separation determines the dipole moment from a rotational Stark doublet:The $\mathrm{D}$ unit is the debye. Using external $h=6.62607015\times 10^{-34}\mathrm{J}\mathrm{s}$ and $1\mathrm{D}=3.33564\times 10^{-30}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{m}$ gives $pE/B\simeq 0.0593$, consistent with weak-field perturbation theory. The two shifted frequencies are about $12.165707$ and $12.162497\mathrm{GHz}$; polarization selects $\Delta m=0$ or $\pm 1$. The inferred value is a magnitude; these shifts do not determine the dipole's sign.^[ref][ref]

The square-root branches avoid one another when $\Delta \ne 0$; crossings with a parallel-spin branch are allowed because total spin projections differ. At zero field the positive-$\Delta$ sketch has one lower singlet and a triplet above it. The source supplies no numerical moment ratio, so the two panels show explicit illustrative signed choices, including the exactly compensated case.

For spin one-half, $s_{\pm }=s_x\pm i{s}_y=(\hslash /2)({\sigma }_x\pm i{\sigma }_y)$, henceThey raise or lower the spin projection by one unit of $\hslash$ and annihilate the corresponding endpoint. The exchange identity ${\mathbf{\sigma }}_1\cdot {\mathbf{\sigma }}_2={\sigma }_{1z}{\sigma }_{2z}+2({\sigma }_{1+}{\sigma }_{2-}+{\sigma }_{1-}{\sigma }_{2+})$ preserves total spin projection.

Write $\Delta =\Delta E$, $u={\mu }_{0}B(g_1+g_2)$ and $w={\mu }_{0}B(g_1-g_2)$. In the listed order $(\uparrow \uparrow ,\downarrow \downarrow ,\uparrow \downarrow ,\downarrow \uparrow )$, direct action givesThe printed matrix instead uses $(\uparrow \uparrow ,\uparrow \downarrow ,\downarrow \uparrow ,\downarrow \downarrow )$. Permuting the listed indices to $(1,3,4,2)$ recovers its central block and diagonal entries. This is a basis-order mismatch in the source, not a different Hamiltonian.

The two-spin exchange spectrum with unequal signed magnetic moments isUse the products $g_j{\mu }_0$ as the signed magnetic coefficients in the stated Hamiltonian. Opposite physical charges must be represented in those signs; they do not by themselves imply equal moment magnitudes. Here ${\mu }_0$ denotes the source's magneton, not vacuum permeability.

Define $\hslash {\omega }_0=E_2-E_1$ and use radiation energy density $u(\omega )$ per unit angular frequency, excluding the zero-point contribution. The Angular-frequency Einstein coefficients give rates per atom: $B_{12}u({\omega }_0)$ for absorption, $B_{21}u({\omega }_0)$ for stimulated emission, and $A_{21}$ for spontaneous emission. Stimulated emission adds a photon to the stimulating mode; spontaneous emission persists with no incident photons.

In thermal equilibrium the Boltzmann distribution gives $N_2/N_1=e^{-\hslash {\omega }_0/(k_{\mathrm{B}}T)}$. Balancing up and down rates yieldsMatching the Planck law for every temperature fixesNo degeneracy factor is needed for these nondegenerate levels.^[ref]

For plates of large area $A$ and spacing $d$, the surviving low-frequency transverse electromagnetic mode has one polarization, $\mathbf{E}\parallel \hat{\mathbf{z}}$, and in-plane wavevector. Periodic in-plane counting givesMultiplying this single-polarization two-dimensional photon density of states by $\hslash \omega$ and the Bose-Einstein distribution produces the thermal radiation between parallel conducting plates:The same rate balance therefore givesThese $B$ coefficients refer to the radiation polarization in their respective environments: isotropic free-space $B$ must not automatically be equated to the coefficient for a specified $z$-polarized field.

For hydrogen, take the quantization axis along $z$, neglect spin-orbit coupling, and assume perfect plates, a wide in-plane region and an unmodified atomic wavefunction: $a_{\mathrm{B}}\ll d\ll c/{\omega }_0$, with negligible surface-induced mixing or shifts. The electric-dipole selection rules for hydrogen require $\Delta l=\pm 1$; the allowed $z$ field has $\Delta m_{\ell }=0$. Hence the polarization-selective spontaneous emission between conducting plates givesThe thin-cavity enhancement of a normal electric dipole applies: the $2p_0\to 1s$ dipole points along $z$ and couples to the enhanced mode density. For $m_{\ell }=\pm 1$, the transition dipoles lie in the $x$–$y$ plane and couple to none of these low-frequency modes: the electric-dipole decay rate is zero in the ideal model, so this channel's lifetime is infinite. Real finite, imperfect plates and additional decay or mixing channels limit the lifetime. The order-one orientation factor for the allowed transition does not change the requested lifetime scaling.

With $y=x-x_0$ and oscillator length $a_0=\sqrt{\hslash /(m\omega )}$, the first two harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions and energies areThe ground state is even and nodeless; the first excited state is odd with one node of a wavefunction. Their rms widths are $a_0/\sqrt{2}$ and $\sqrt{3/2}{a}_0$. Also, $m{\omega }^2{a}_0^2\sim \hslash \omega$ gives the characteristic extent directly.

For the shaken harmonic trap, expanding about the unshifted Hamiltonian givesThe scalar term gives only a common phase and no transitions. In time-dependent perturbation theory, initially $c_0=1$, $c_{n\ne 0}=0$ and the oscillatory factor for $0\to 1$ is $e^{i(E_1-E_0)t/\hslash }=e^{i\omega t}$. ThusThe odd operator $x$ makes transitions to even $n>0$ vanish by parity. In fact the first-order selection rule for a linearly driven oscillator is stronger: since $x=a_0(a+a^{†})/\sqrt{2}$,All excited $n\ne 1$ amplitudes vanish at first order, including odd $n>1$. This assertion does not apply to the surviving $c_0$ or to higher perturbative orders.

Put $\delta =\omega -\Omega$, $\Sigma =\omega +\Omega$. The exact first-order time integral isNear resonance, the second term oscillates rapidly at approximately $2\omega$ and is bounded by $1/\Sigma$, whereas the first grows as $T/2$ on resonance. Thus $\omega T\gg 1$ justifies the rotating-wave approximation, $\cos \Omega t\mapsto e^{-i\Omega t}/2$. At zeros of the resonant term, the omitted small contribution can dominate the residual; the approximation has no uniform relative-error bound there.

Using the requested order-one approximation $⟨1|x|0⟩\simeq a_0$ and $m{\omega }^2{a}_0/\hslash =\omega /a_0$ gives the square-pulse resonance profileThe exact harmonic oscillator matrix element instead gives half this probability. The finite central maximum is at $\Omega =\omega$; first zeros are at $|\Omega -\omega |=2\pi /T$, with smaller side lobes and a $1/{\delta }^2$ envelope. Increasing $T$ narrows the peak as $1/T$ and increases its height as $T^2$, as long as weak resonant driving keeps $p_1\ll 1$. Small displacement alone does not ensure this for arbitrarily long $T$; near resonance one also needs $\epsilon \omega T/a_0\ll 1$.