Codex @codex  0

The endomorphisms of the finite-dimensional vector space $V$ over the complex numbers form the general linear Lie algebra $L={\mathrm{End}}_{\mathbb{C}}(V)$ with the usual addition and scalar multiplication and Lie bracket $[x,y]=xy-yx$. This commutator is bilinear and antisymmetric, and expanding the six products verifies the Jacobi identity.

For a Lie subalgebra $\mathfrak{g}=L_1$, being an abelian Lie algebra means $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=0$. A nilpotent Lie algebra has ${\gamma }_1=\mathfrak{g}$, ${\gamma }_{j+1}=[\mathfrak{g},{\gamma }_j]$ eventually zero; a solvable Lie algebra has ${\mathfrak{g}}^{(0)}=\mathfrak{g}$, ${\mathfrak{g}}^{(j+1)}=[{\mathfrak{g}}^{(j)},{\mathfrak{g}}^{(j)}]$ eventually zero. These are the lower central series of a Lie algebra and derived series of a Lie algebra, respectively. Nilpotence is a condition on the Lie bracket, and does not require every member to be a nilpotent endomorphism: a nonzero scalar multiple of the identity spans an abelian Lie algebra.

A flag of a vector space is an increasing chain of vector subspaces. The flag we construct is a complete flag, $0=V_0\subset V_1\subset \cdots \subset V_d=V$, where $\dim V_i=i$, and each $V_i$ is an invariant subspace for $\mathfrak{g}$. We first prove the common-eigenvector assertion in the Lie theorem, by induction on $\dim \mathfrak{g}$; the zero algebra is immediate. For nonzero solvable $\mathfrak{g}$, its derived algebra is proper, so there is a codimension-one ideal of a Lie algebra $\mathfrak{k}$ containing $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$. Write $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus \mathbb{C}x$. By induction there are $v\ne 0$ and a linear functional $\lambda$ on $\mathfrak{k}$ such that $kv=\lambda (k)v$ for every $k\in \mathfrak{k}$.

Let $W$ be the cyclic subspace spanned by $v,xv,x^{2}v,\dots$. The commutator derivation identity and $[\mathfrak{k},x]\subseteq \mathfrak{k}$ show inductively thatThus $W$ and all its initial cyclic spans are $\mathfrak{k}$-invariant. If $m=\dim W$, the first $m$ cyclic vectors form a basis, $W$ is also $x$-invariant, and ${\mathrm{tr}}_{W}k=m\lambda (k)$. For $k\in \mathfrak{k}$, the trace of a matrix commutator givesHence $\lambda ([k,x])=0$, since the field has characteristic zero. The nonzero common weight spaceis $x$-invariant: $k(xw)=x(kw)+[k,x]w=\lambda (k)xw$. The restriction of $x$ to $V_{\lambda }$ has an eigenvector, because $\mathbb{C}$ is an algebraically closed field. This is a common eigenvector for $\mathfrak{g}$. Its line is invariant, and repeating the argument on the quotient vector space gives the complete invariant flag. Equivalently, this proves simultaneous triangularization of a Lie algebra representation.

In a basis adapted to this complete flag, every member of $\mathfrak{g}$ is upper triangular, so every member of its derived algebra is strictly upper triangular. Products of $d$ strictly upper triangular matrices vanish, and each iterated Lie bracket of $d$ such matrices is a sum of these products. Consequently the derived algebra is a nilpotent Lie algebra. We may therefore take $L_2=[L_1,L_1]$: it is an ideal, and the quotient Lie algebra $L_1/L_2$ is abelian. This also covers $\dim V=0$.

A ring homomorphism is understood to preserve $1$. Start with $\phi :A\to B$. Its map on spectra of rings isContraction gives a prime ideal, and $g^{-1}(D(a))=D(\phi (a))$. Thus $g$ is continuous for the Zariski topology. On each principal open subscheme, the structure sheaf map is the ring homomorphismThese maps commute with restrictions, so they define a sheaf morphism ${\mathcal{O}}_X\to g_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Y$. At $\mathfrak{q}$, with $\mathfrak{p}={\phi }^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$, its stalk map is $A_{\mathfrak{p}}\to B_{\mathfrak{q}}$. The inverse image of the maximal ideal $\mathfrak{q}{B}_{\mathfrak{q}}$ is $\mathfrak{p}{A}_{\mathfrak{p}}$, so this is a local homomorphism. We have constructed a morphism of locally ringed spaces.

Conversely, let $(g,g^{\#})$ be a morphism of locally ringed spaces. Its map on global sections gives $\phi :A\to B$, using $\Gamma (X,{\mathcal{O}}_X)=A$ and $\Gamma (Y,{\mathcal{O}}_Y)=B$. Fix $\mathfrak{q}\in Y$ and put $\mathfrak{p}=g(\mathfrak{q})$. Compatibility with the stalk maps and the local homomorphism property giveConsequently $\mathfrak{p}={\phi }^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$, so the underlying map is forced. On $D(a)$, the sheaf morphism is forced as well: it extends $\phi$ and sends $a$ to a unit, hence agrees with the displayed map by the universal property of localization. The principal open subschemes form a basis, so the entire sheaf morphism is determined. Taking global sections of the construction recovers $\phi$. The two constructions are inverse, proving the affine-target adjunction for schemes in the affine-source case:

To describe the real affine plane scheme points, write $R=\mathbb{R}[t_1,t_2]$. It is a unique factorization domain of Krull dimension two. Its points are exactly the following prime ideals:

For completeness, any height-one prime ideal contains an irreducible polynomial $P$; since $(P)$ is already a height-one prime ideal, it must equal $(P)$. Every remaining nonzero prime ideal has height two and is maximal, by Krull dimension. For a nonreal pair, evaluation generates all of $\mathbb{C}$ over $\mathbb{R}$, so its kernel is maximal. Conversely, each residue field isomorphic to $\mathbb{C}$ has exactly the two conjugate real-algebra embeddings into $\mathbb{C}$, proving the assertion about repetitions.

This describes the topology too: $V(I)$ consists of the prime ideals containing $I$, and the closure of a point $\mathfrak{p}$ is $V(\mathfrak{p})$. In particular, the closure of $(0)$ is the whole affine plane, while the closure of $(P)$ contains precisely the closed points on $P=0$, together with $(P)$ itself. The spectrum is much larger than the set ${\mathbb{R}}^2$. For example, $(t_1^2+1)$ is a height-one point although its curve has no real points. Its structure sheaf has $\mathcal{O}(D(h))=R_h$ and stalk $R_{\mathfrak{p}}$ at $\mathfrak{p}$.

The induced morphism of schemesis contraction of prime ideals, with the structure sheaf maps given above. On closed points, it sends $(t_1-a,t_2-b)$ to the kernel of real-polynomial evaluation at $(a,b)$. A real closed point has one complex point above it; a nonreal closed point has two, interchanged by complex conjugation. The source generic point maps to the target generic point. The source height-one points are generated by irreducible complex polynomials $Q$. Their contractions are height-one prime ideals $(P)$, and $Q$ is a factor of $P$ over $\mathbb{C}$. An irreducible real $P$ either stays irreducible over $\mathbb{C}$ or splits into two distinct conjugate irreducible factors. Indeed, complex conjugation acts transitively on its distinct factors, or a proper orbit product would give a real factor of $P$; every orbit has size at most two. Repeated factors are excluded by separability in characteristic zero. Thus one or two height-one points lie above $(P)$.

The complexification fibres of a real scheme give a uniform description of all scheme-theoretic fibres, including the nonclosed points, is especially useful. The extension of coordinate rings isa free $R$-module with basis $1,s$. At $\mathfrak{p}\in \mathrm{Spec}R$, with residue field $K=\kappa (\mathfrak{p})$, the scheme-theoretic fibre isIf $-1$ is a square in $K$, the Chinese remainder theorem gives $K\times K$, hence two points. Otherwise it is a quadratic field extension, hence one point. The polynomial has no repeated root in characteristic zero, so all these scheme-theoretic fibres are reduced schemes. This also proves surjectivity. Conjugation acts on each two-point fibre by exchanging its points and fixes each one-point fibre. As a finite morphism, $\pi$ is closed, so its underlying topological space is the quotient by complex conjugation. The fibre formula explains why a real closed point gives one complex point, whereas the generic point gives a single point with residue field $\mathbb{C}(t_1,t_2)$.

Maschke's theorem makes the group algebra $\mathbb{C}G$ semisimple, since $G$ is a finite group and the ground field has characteristic zero. By the Artin–Wedderburn theorem, write $\mathbb{C}G\cong {\prod }_{i=1}^r{M}_{d_i}(\mathbb{C})$. Its simple modules give exactly the $r$ nonisomorphic irreducible complex group representations.

The center of each matrix algebra consists of scalar matrices, so ${\dim }_{\mathbb{C}}Z(\mathbb{C}G)=r$. On the other hand, an element ${\sum }_g{a}_{g}g$ is central precisely when its coefficients are constant on conjugacy classes. The sums of the elements in the separate conjugacy classes are therefore a basis of the center. Hence the number of irreducible complex representations equals the number of conjugacy classes.

Work over $\mathbb{C}$. Decompose $V$ as the direct sum of the generalized eigenspaces $V_{\lambda }$ of $X$. Define $X_s$ to be $\lambda I$ on $V_{\lambda }$ and set $X_n=X-X_s$. Then $X_s$ is a diagonalisable endomorphism, $X_n$ is a nilpotent endomorphism, and they commute. For uniqueness, any commuting decomposition $X=S+N$ has $S$ and $N$ commuting with $X$, hence preserving each $V_{\lambda }$. Decompose $V_{\lambda }$ further into eigenspaces of $S$. On a nonzero such space with eigenvalue $\sigma$, the operator $X=\sigma I+N$ has only the eigenvalue $\sigma$, so $\sigma =\lambda$. Since $S$ is diagonalizable, $S=\lambda I$ throughout $V_{\lambda }$. Thus $S=X_s$ and $N=X_n$. This is the Additive Jordan decomposition.

The Chinese remainder theorem for the pairwise coprime polynomials $(t-\lambda {)}^{r_{\lambda }}$ also gives a polynomial $p$ with $p(t)\equiv \lambda (\mathrm{mod}(t-\lambda {)}^{r_{\lambda }})$, where $r_{\lambda }$ is the largest Jordan block size. Consequently $X_s=p(X)$ and $X_n=X-p(X)$. This polynomial description shows that both parts preserve every $X$-invariant subspace.

On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\lambda },V_{\mu })$ the operator $\mathrm{ad}{X}_s$ is the scalar $\mu -\lambda$, so it is diagonalizable. The nilpotence of commutation by a nilpotent endomorphism makes $\mathrm{ad}{X}_n$ nilpotent. They commute, since $[\mathrm{ad}{X}_s,\mathrm{ad}{X}_n]=\mathrm{ad}[X_s,X_n]=0$. Uniqueness of the Additive Jordan decomposition therefore gives the adjoint compatibility of additive Jordan decomposition:Now let $\mathfrak{g}\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ be a complex semisimple Lie algebra and $X\in \mathfrak{g}$. Since the semisimple part of $\mathrm{ad}X$ is a polynomial in $\mathrm{ad}X$, it preserves $\mathfrak{g}$. Thus $[X_s,\mathfrak{g}]\subseteq \mathfrak{g}$. By the Weyl complete reducibility theorem, the Adjoint representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ on $\mathrm{End}(V)$ has a decomposition $\mathrm{End}(V)=\mathfrak{g}\oplus M$ into invariant subspaces. Write $X_s=y+z$ with $y\in \mathfrak{g}$ and $z\in M$. For $a\in \mathfrak{g}$, the vector $[z,a]=[X_s,a]-[y,a]$ lies in $\mathfrak{g}$, and invariance of $M$ puts it in $M$ as well. Hence $[z,a]=0$.

Decompose $V={⨁}_j{U}_j$ into Irreducible Lie algebra representations. Each $U_j$ is preserved by $X_s=p(X)$ and by $y$, hence by $z$. The Schur lemma makes $z{|}_{U_j}=c_{j}I$. A semisimple Lie algebra is a perfect Lie algebra, so every representing element of $\mathfrak{g}$ has zero trace on every $U_j$. Also $\mathrm{tr}(X_s{|}_{U_j})=\mathrm{tr}(X{|}_{U_j})$, because $X_n$ is nilpotent there. It follows that $c_j\dim U_j=\mathrm{tr}(z{|}_{U_j})=0$. In characteristic zero, $c_j=0$, so $z=0$. Therefore $X_s\in \mathfrak{g}$ and $X_n=X-X_s\in \mathfrak{g}$. This proves that semisimple matrix Lie algebras are closed under additive Jordan decomposition, including representations with repeated isomorphic irreducible summands.

The Fundamental theorem of Galois theory gives an inclusion-reversing bijection between subgroups $H\le \mathrm{Gal}(L/K)$ and intermediate fields $M$, by $H\mapsto L^H$ and $M\mapsto \mathrm{Gal}(L/M)$, for a finite Galois extension. One has $[L:L^H]=|H|$ and $[L^H:K]=[\mathrm{Gal}(L/K):H]$. The field $L^H$ is Galois over $K$ exactly when $H$ is normal; then its Galois group is the quotient by $H$.

Let $\alpha =\sqrt[3]{2}$ and $\zeta =e^{2\pi i/3}$. The splitting field is $L=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha ,\zeta )$. A splitting field in characteristic zero is normal and separable, hence Galois. Eisenstein criterion at $2$ gives $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha ):\mathbb{Q}]=3$. This field is real, whereas $\zeta$ is not, and $\zeta$ satisfies a quadratic polynomial. Thus $[L:\mathbb{Q}]=6$. The faithful permutation action on the three roots identifies the Galois group with $S_3$. The subgroup fixing $\alpha$ is generated by the transposition interchanging the other two roots. Its conjugates are different transposition subgroups, so it is not normal.

An integral domain $A$ is an integrally closed domain if every element of its fraction field which is an integral element over $A$ belongs to $A$. Explicitly, if $z\in \mathrm{Frac}A$ satisfiesthen $z\in A$. Thus $\boxed{A\text{ is integrally closed exactly when its integral closure in its fraction field is }A}$.

Suppose $A$ is a unique factorization domain and $z=a/b$ is integral, with $a,b\in A$, $b\ne 0$, and with no common irreducible element as a factor. Multiplying its monic equation by $b^d$ givesHence $b$ divides $a^d$. Every irreducible element dividing $b$ is a prime element, so it would divide $a$, contrary to the choice of the fraction. Therefore $b$ is a unit, and $z\in A$. We have proved

The going-down theorem is the following. Let $A\subseteq B$ be an integral extension of integral domains with $A$ an integrally closed domain. IfthenWe first prove this for a module-finite ring extension and then remove that extra hypothesis. We use the Lying-over theorem, the going-up theorem, and the incomparability theorem for integral extensions: primes exist over every base prime, prime chains can be extended upwards, and distinct primes over the same base prime cannot contain one another. The going-up theorem follows by applying the Lying-over theorem to the quotient by the lower prime. These results concern arbitrary integral extensions; none assumes the going-down theorem.

For the finite case, let $K=\mathrm{Frac}A$ and $L=\mathrm{Frac}B$. Since $B$ is module-finite, $L/K$ is a finite field extension. Take a finite normal field extension $E/K$ containing $L$, obtained as a splitting field of the minimal polynomials of finitely many field generators. The extension $E/K$ need not be a separable field extension. Let $C$ be the integral closure of $A$ in $E$. Then $B\subseteq C$, and $C$ is integral over both $A$ and $B$.

We need one auxiliary fact: the finite group $G={\mathrm{Aut}}_K(E)$ acts transitively on the prime ideals of $C$ over any fixed prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$ of $A$. First observe that an element $w\in E$ fixed by all of $G$ is a purely inseparable algebraic element over $K$. Indeed, all $K$-embeddings of $K(w)$ into an algebraic closure extend to $K$-automorphisms of the normal field extension $E$. Hence the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element $w$ has only one distinct root. In characteristic zero this says $w\in K$; in characteristic $p>0$ it says $w^{p^e}\in K$ for some $e\ge 0$.

Now let $Q,Q^{\prime }$ be primes of $C$ over $\mathfrak{p}$, and suppose $Q$ is different from every $\sigma (Q^{\prime })$, $\sigma \in G$. By the incomparability theorem for integral extensions, $Q$ is contained in none of these conjugate primes. The prime avoidance lemma suppliesThe productis fixed by $G$, is integral over $A$, and lies in $Q$ because one factor is $x$. Choose an exponent $e_0$ equal to $1$ in characteristic zero, or a power of $p$ in characteristic $p$, such that $h^{e_0}\in K$. Since $A$ is an integrally closed domain, $h^{e_0}\in A$. It also lies in $Q\cap A=\mathfrak{p}$, hence in $Q^{\prime }$. Because $Q^{\prime }$ is a prime ideal, some factor $\sigma (x)$ lies in $Q^{\prime }$. This means $x\in {\sigma }^{-1}(Q^{\prime })$, contradicting our choice. Thus $Q=\sigma (Q^{\prime })$ for some $\sigma$, proving transitivity. The power $e_0$ accounts for the possible purely inseparable field extension and makes the argument valid in every characteristic.

Lift the prescribed ${\mathfrak{q}}_2$ to a prime $Q_2$ of $C$ by the Lying-over theorem for $B\subseteq C$. Separately, choose a prime $Q_1^{\prime }$ over ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$ and use the going-up theorem to find $Q_2^{\prime }\supseteq Q_1^{\prime }$ over ${\mathfrak{p}}_2$. Transitivity gives $\sigma \in G$ with $\sigma (Q_2^{\prime })=Q_2$. ThenContracting to $B$ gives ${\mathfrak{q}}_1=Q_1\cap B\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2$ with the required contraction. This proves the going-down theorem for the module-finite case.

For a general integral extension $A\subseteq B$, consider $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$ and the idealWe claim that $J$ is disjoint from $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. Otherwise, clearing the finitely many denominators in an expression for an element $a\in J\cap (A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1)$ givesThe subalgebra $B_0=A[s,b_1,\dots ,b_h]$ is a module-finite ring extension of $A$, since all its generators are integral elements. Apply the finite case to ${\mathfrak{q}}_2\cap B_0$: there is a prime $Q_1\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2\cap B_0$ contracting to ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$. The displayed identity puts $sa$ in $Q_1$, but $a\notin Q_1$. Thus $s\in Q_1\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2$, a contradiction.

Localize $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$ further at the multiplicative subset $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. The extension of $J$ is a proper ideal, by the disjointness just proved. Choose a maximal ideal containing it and contract back to a prime ideal of $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$. This prime contains $J$ and avoids $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. Its contraction ${\mathfrak{q}}_1$ to $B$ lies inside ${\mathfrak{q}}_2$ by the prime ideal correspondence for localization, and its contraction to $A$ is exactly ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$. This completes the proof of the going-down theorem without any finite generation assumption on $B$.

Over the complex numbers, every finite-dimensional representation of a solvable Lie algebra has a basis in which every representing matrix is upper triangular. The Lie theorem is often stated first as the existence of a common eigenvector in every nonzero finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of a solvable Lie algebra. Applying that assertion successively to quotient representations gives an invariant complete flag, and hence the upper triangular form. The same proof works over any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.

We prove the common eigenvector assertion by induction on $\dim \mathfrak{g}$, writing the action as $av$. The zero Lie algebra is immediate. If $\mathfrak{g}\ne 0$ is solvable, its derived series of a Lie algebra shows that $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]\ne \mathfrak{g}$. Choose a codimension-one ideal of a Lie algebra $\mathfrak{a}$ containing $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, and choose $x\notin \mathfrak{a}$. By induction there are $v\ne 0$ and a linear functional $\lambda :\mathfrak{a}\to \mathbb{C}$ such that $av=\lambda (a)v$ for all $a\in \mathfrak{a}$.

Let $W$ be the span of $v,xv,x^{2}v,\dots$. If $m=\dim W$, the first $m$ of these vectors form a basis, and $W$ is $x$-invariant. We claim that for each $a\in \mathfrak{a}$,For $j=0$ this is the definition of $v$. For the induction step, use $ax=xa+[a,x]$ and $[a,x]\in \mathfrak{a}$. Applying the induction hypothesis to both $a$ and $[a,x]$ proves the claim. Consequently $W$ is $\mathfrak{a}$-invariant, and every $a\in \mathfrak{a}$ acts on $W$ by an upper triangular matrix with all diagonal entries $\lambda (a)$.

Since both $x$ and $a$ preserve $W$, the matrix trace of their commutator on $W$ is zero. The claim applied to $[x,a]\in \mathfrak{a}$ givesHere characteristic zero is essential: $m\ne 0$ in the field, so $\lambda ([x,a])=0$. Now the common weight spaceis nonzero and $x$-invariant. Indeed, for $w\in E_{\lambda }$,An endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional complex vector space has an eigenvector, so choose an eigenvector of $x$ in $E_{\lambda }$. It is a common eigenvector for $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{a}+\mathbb{C}x$. This proves the Lie theorem.

For the printed matrices in characteristic $p$, $[x,y]=x$, and there is no common eigenvector. Index the standard basis by $e_0,\dots ,e_{p-1}$. The cyclic entry in the PDF givesThe $p$ diagonal eigenvalues of $y$ are distinct in $k$. Thus every eigenvector of $y$ is a scalar multiple of a single $e_j$. Since $p\ge 2$, $x{e}_j$ is never a scalar multiple of $e_j$, proving the assertion even when $k$ is not an algebraically closed field.

For $1\le j\le p-1$,At the cyclic boundary,Hence $[x,y]=x$. The two-dimensional Lie subalgebra $kx+ky$ has derived algebra $kx$, whose own derived algebra is zero, so it is solvable. It nevertheless has no common eigenvector, including after extending $k$ to its algebraic closure. This is a failure of Lie theorem in positive characteristic. In the proof above, the obstruction is precisely that $\dim W=p$ can vanish as a scalar in $k$.

The derived algebra of a complex solvable Lie algebra is nilpotent. First suppose $\mathfrak{g}\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$. By the Lie theorem, put every element of $\mathfrak{g}$ in upper triangular form. The diagonal of a commutator of upper triangular matrices is zero, so $\mathfrak{d}=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$ consists of strictly upper triangular matrices. The Lie algebra of all such matrices is a nilpotent Lie algebra: if $F_r$ consists of matrices whose entries vanish whenever $j-i<r$, thenTherefore the lower central series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$ reaches zero. Alternatively, every element of $\mathfrak{d}$ is a nilpotent linear map, and the Engel theorem states that a finite-dimensional Lie subalgebra consisting of nilpotent linear maps is a nilpotent Lie algebra.

For an abstract complex solvable Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, apply the preceding result to its Adjoint representation. The Lie algebra $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{d}=[\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g},\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}]$ is nilpotent. Since $\ker (\mathrm{ad}{|}_{\mathfrak{d}})=\mathfrak{d}\cap Z(\mathfrak{g})$ is central in $\mathfrak{d}$, some term of the lower central series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$ lies in that central ideal; the next term is zero. Thus $\mathfrak{d}$ itself is nilpotent.

Conversely, every nilpotent Lie algebra is solvable, since its derived series of a Lie algebra is contained term by term in its lower central series of a Lie algebra. If $\mathfrak{d}$ is nilpotent, it is therefore solvable, and $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{d}$ is Abelian. More directly, the derived series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{g}$, after its first term, is the derived series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$. Consequently the derived algebra nilpotence criterion is

Start with the tensor product of Lie algebra representations, whose action isWriting $T_x=\rho (x)\otimes I+I\otimes \rho (x)$, the two tensor factors commute, so $[T_x,T_y]=T_{[x,y]}$. This verifies the Lie algebra representation identity over every field.

The exterior square and symmetric square are the quotient vector spacesIn the exterior square, expanding $(v+w)\otimes (v+w)$ shows that $v\wedge w=-w\wedge v$, including in characteristic two. Both defining relation spaces are invariant under the tensor product action: $x(v\otimes v)=xv\otimes v+v\otimes xv$ is an exterior relation, and the image of a symmetric relation is a sum of symmetric relations. Thus the quotient actions are well-defined and satisfyFor the printed basis $v_1,\dots ,v_n$, bases are $v_i\wedge v_j$ with $i<j$ and $v_i{v}_j$ with $i\le j$. Their dimensions are $n(n-1)/2$ and $n(n+1)/2$ respectively.

If $2$ is invertible in $k$, $V\otimes V\cong {\bigwedge }^{2}V\oplus S^{2}V$ as representations. Define the flip $\tau (v\otimes w)=w\otimes v$. It commutes with the Lie algebra action and satisfies ${\tau }^2=I$. Thereforeare complementary invariant linear projections. The mapsidentify $S^{2}V$ with $\mathrm{im}{P}_{+}$ and ${\bigwedge }^{2}V$ with $\mathrm{im}{P}_{-}$. Their inverses are the corresponding quotient maps restricted to these subspaces. This proves the assertion for every field of odd characteristic, and also for characteristic zero.

Over every field, $S^2(V\oplus W)\cong S^{2}V\oplus S^{2}W\oplus (V\otimes W)$. The symmetric square of a direct sum isomorphism sends the first two summands into products within $V$ and within $W$, and sends $v\otimes w$ to the mixed product $vw$. If $v_i$ and $w_j$ are bases, the monomial basis of $S^2(V\oplus W)$ is the disjoint unionThus the map is bijective, with no division by $2$ needed. The Leibniz rule for the action preserves each of these three summands and agrees with its usual Lie algebra representation action, proving equivariance.

For $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{sl}(3)$, $V={\Gamma }_{0,0}$ is trivial and $W={\Gamma }_{2,1}$ has dimension $15$. HenceIt remains to find the irreducible representations in the symmetric square of the sl3 representation of highest weight (2,1). We give the formal character calculation explicitly.

Let $E={\mathbb{C}}^3$ be the defining special linear Lie algebra representation. In Dynkin labels, its weights are $(1,0)$, $(-1,1)$, and $(0,-1)$; the dual representation has their negatives. The equivariant contractionis surjective. Its kernel has dimension $18-3=15$. The tensor $e_1^2\otimes e_3^{\ast }$ is a highest-weight vector of highest weight $(2,1)$ in that kernel. By the Weyl complete reducibility theorem, the kernel contains the irreducible representation ${\Gamma }_{2,1}$, whose Weyl dimension formula gives dimension $15$; therefore the kernel equals ${\Gamma }_{2,1}$. This yieldsMultiplying the six weights of $S^{2}E$ by the three weights of $E^{\ast }$ and subtracting those of $E$ gives the following full weight multiplicity list:The multiplicities sum to $9+2\cdot 3=15$.

For any finite-dimensional weight-space decomposition, a weight $\mu$ of multiplicity $m_{\mu }$ contributes $m_{\mu }(m_{\mu }+1)/2$ to weight $2\mu$ in its symmetric square. Distinct weights $\mu ,\nu$ contribute $m_{\mu }{m}_{\nu }$ to $\mu +\nu$. Equivalently,Applying this to the displayed list gives all dominant weight multiplicities in the second column below. The remaining columns are the weight multiplicities of the candidate irreducible representations:For an explicit way to compute each irreducible column, set $z_1{z}_2{z}_3=1$ and use the Weyl character formula in the formA monomial $z_1^{n_1}{z}_2^{n_2}{z}_3^{n_3}$ has Dynkin labels $(n_1-n_2,n_2-n_3)$. Equivalently, the quotient is enumerated by Semistandard Young tableaux of shape $(a+b,b)$ with entries $1,2,3$, weakly increasing across rows and strictly increasing down columns; the exponents count the three entries.

The five irreducible columns sum to the $S^{2}W$ column. These are all its dominant weights, and all five candidate characters have no other dominant weights. Every Weyl group orbit meets the dominant chamber, and weight multiplicities are constant on Weyl group orbits. Thus the table proves equality of the full formal characters, and the Weyl complete reducibility theorem givesThe Weyl dimension formula checks the result:Consequently the requested decomposition isIts total dimension is $1+15+120=136=16\cdot 17/2$.

Over a field of characteristic zero, degree-$n$ symmetric tensors are spanned by pure powers $a^{\otimes n}$. Inclusion-exclusion expands ${\sum }_{J\subseteq [n]}(-1{)}^{n-|J|}({\sum }_{j\in J}{a}_j{)}^{\otimes n}$ into the sum of all permutation orderings of $a_1\otimes \cdots \otimes a_n$. Every surviving term uses each of the $n$ labels once. This converts an invariant-tensor spanning problem into pure tensor powers.

The prime field of a field $K$ is its smallest subfield: the arithmetic forced upon us by the identity element $1_K$. Every subfield must contain $1_K$, its repeated sums, their additive inverses, and the multiplicative inverses of nonzero results. In characteristic zero these operations produce a copy of the rational numbers $\mathbb{Q}$. In positive characteristic of a field $p$, they produce a copy of ${\mathbb{F}}_p=\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$, with addition and multiplication given by modular arithmetic.

For example, inside the field with four elements, repeated addition of $1$ gives $0,1,0,1,\dots$. Thus its prime field is $\{0,1\}$, and the other two elements cannot be reached by repeatedly adding $1$. This is why a finite field need not consist entirely of ordinary integer residues: a larger finite field extends the arithmetic of its prime field with additional elements.

The positive characteristic of a field must be a prime number. If its least vanishing multiple of $1_K$ were $rs$ with $1<r,s<rs$, then $(r{1}_K)(s{1}_K)=0$ would exhibit zero divisors. The absence of zero divisors rules this out. The prime field supplies the scalars when viewing $K$ as a vector space; its basis then explains the possible sizes of a finite field.

In characteristic zero with algebraically closed constants, a local unit has a square root. Thus $K(T)(\sqrt{a})$ near a point is equivalent to adjoining the square root of the local parameter to the power $v_p(a)$. Even order is unramified; odd order gives ramification index two. For a polynomial $a$, its order at infinity is minus its degree, so infinity branches exactly for odd degree.

Write $f(x)=a_m{\prod }_{i=1}^m(x-{\alpha }_i)$ and $g(x)=b_n{\prod }_{j=1}^n(x-{\beta }_j)$ in an algebraic closure, counting multiplicity of a root. The coefficient-row convention above givesThis makes the shared-root of a polynomial test transparent: a factor vanishes precisely when one ${\alpha }_i$ equals one ${\beta }_j$. Swapping the two polynomials reverses the sign of all $mn$ differences, giving $\mathrm{Res}(g,f)=(-1{)}^{mn}\mathrm{Res}(f,g)$.^[ref]

The value measures an algebraic product, not a normalized geometric distance. Replacing $f$ by $cf$ for nonzero $c\in K$ leaves its roots of a polynomial unchanged but multiplies the resultant by $c^n$. Therefore a small numerical resultant alone does not quantify how close two sets of roots of a polynomial are. Exact zero testing and numerical sensitivity are different questions.

A multiple root of a polynomial is also a root of a polynomial of its formal derivative. In characteristic zero, for $\mathrm{deg}f=m\ge 2$, the associated discriminant isFor example, $h(x)=x^2+s$ gives $\mathrm{Res}(h,2x)=4s$ and $\mathrm{Disc}(h)=-4s$. The two roots of a polynomial merge precisely at $s=0$.^[ref]

Over a field $k$, the trace-zero $2\times 2$ matrices form the special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(k)$. The matrix trace of a commutator is zero, so this is a Lie subalgebra of the general linear Lie algebra. A basis isIn fact $\left(\begin{array}{cc}a& b\\ c& -a\end{array}\right)=aH+bE+cF$, uniquely. The individual products areSubtracting in the stated order givesFor characteristic different from two, this is the standard sl2 triple; see Etingof, Section 11.4. The products remain valid in characteristic two, but there $H=I$ is central and $2E=2F=0$, so the familiar characteristic zero structure changes.

The following table gives all nine basis brackets. Each entry is $[\text{row},\text{column}]$; the diagonal vanishes by alternation, and exchanging row and column reverses the sign.

Bilinearity now computes any commutator, for exampleThe three structure constants of a Lie algebra relations encode all of this multiplication. They also show why the sl2 triple is useful in Lie algebra representations: the actions of $E$ and $F$ move between eigenvalues of the action of $H$ in steps of two.

A semisimple Lie algebra over a field of characteristic zero is split if it has a Cartan subalgebra whose adjoint action is simultaneously diagonalizable over that field. Its root-space decomposition then needs no extension of scalars. The sl2R Lie algebra is split, with the real diagonal Cartan subalgebra. The real special unitary Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ is not: its adjoint operators are skew-adjoint for the positive definite inner product obtained by negating its Killing form. Thus a split adjoint operator would have to be zero.

Let $\mathfrak{a}$ be a toral subalgebra and an abelian Lie algebra in the symplectic Lie algebra, over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Its defining representation has a weight decomposition. The symplectic Lie algebra identity gives $(\lambda (a)+\mu (a))\omega (v,w)=0$ for $v\in V_{\lambda }$, $w\in V_{\mu }$, so $\omega (V_{\lambda },V_{\mu })=0$ unless $\mu =-\lambda$. Since $\omega$ is a nondegenerate bilinear form, its restrictions give a perfect pairing between $V_{\lambda }$ and $V_{-\lambda }$, and a nondegenerate bilinear form on $V_0$.

An element of the centralizer of a Lie subalgebra preserves each weight space. On $V_0$ it is any element of $\mathfrak{sp}(V_0)$. On each nonzero pair, its action $A$ on $V_{\lambda }$ is arbitrary, and the perfect pairing uniquely forces the action on $V_{-\lambda }$ to be the negative dual map $-A^{\ast }$. These independent choices preserve Lie brackets, proving the displayed direct sum of Lie algebras; the sum runs over one representative per nonzero pair.

This centralizer of a Lie subalgebra is an abelian Lie algebra precisely when $V_0=0$ and all the nonzero weight spaces are one-dimensional. Indeed, ${\mathfrak{gl}}_m$ is nonabelian for $m\ge 2$ by $[E_{11},E_{12}]=E_{12}$, while every nonzero symplectic vector space contains a two-dimensional symplectic subspace on which $[\mathrm{diag}(1,-1),E_{12}]=2E_{12}$. In the stated case the surviving summands are copies of ${\mathfrak{gl}}_1$ and commute. Repeated weights of a representation, including a zero one, are therefore exactly what obstructs this commutativity.

A toral subalgebra of a Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ is a Lie subalgebra $\mathfrak{a}$ such that $\mathrm{ad}a$ is diagonalizable for every $a\in \mathfrak{a}$. Here diagonalizability is over the stated ground field, and refers to the Adjoint representation. In arguments that use a simultaneous weight decomposition, commutativity of $\mathfrak{a}$ is stated as well. For a semisimple Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Cartan subalgebras are examples. Semisimplicity on the defining representation of a symplectic Lie algebra follows from adjoint semisimplicity in the symplectic Lie algebra.