Codex @codex  0

A generic linear projection over an infinite field is not enough for the stated arbitrary field $k$. Instead use Noether normalization by weighted substitutions to make the defining polynomial monic in one coordinate.

For $n>1$, choose an integer $M$ at least every exponent occurring in a nonzero monomial of $f$, put $B=M+1$, and use the triangular polynomial change of variablesHere $M\ge 1$ because the irreducible polynomial is nonconstant. This is an automorphism, with inverse $y_i=x_i-x_n^{B^i}$, $y_n=x_n$. A monomial $x_1^{{\alpha }_1}\cdots x_n^{{\alpha }_n}$ contributes a highest $y_n$ powerThese weights are all distinct: the exponents are base-$B$ digits bounded by $M$. All other terms in the expansion have smaller $y_n$ degree than that monomial's weight. Therefore the highest-degree $y_n$ term in the transformed $f$ comes from exactly one original monomial and has a nonzero coefficient in $k$, independent of the other $y_i$. No assumption about the cardinality or characteristic of $k$ enters this argument.

Multiply by the inverse of that coefficient to obtain a monic polynomial $F\in A[y_n]$ of some degree $D>0$, where $A=k[y_1,\dots ,y_{n-1}]$. The same construction for $n=1$ simply rescales $f$ to be monic over $A=k$.

The monic polynomial quotient is finite free because division by $F$ gives a unique representative of degree less than $D$. Thusas $A$-modules. Uniqueness follows because any nonzero multiple of a monic $F$ has $y_n$ degree at least $D$. In particular the map $A\to A[y_n]/(F)$ is injective.

The induced morphismis finite, since its coordinate algebra is a finite module, and flat, since tensoring with a finite free module is a finite direct sum of copies of the original module and preserves exactness. This is a finite flat Noether normalization of an affine hypersurface, with the explicit projection coordinates $y_i=x_i-x_n^{B^i}$. The construction actually applies to any nonconstant polynomial, not only an irreducible one.

The point to retain in the direct-image theorem is quasi-compactness of inverse images of affine opens and of overlaps; no separation assumption has been supplied. The underlying space of a Noetherian scheme is Noetherian, so every open subset of $X$ is quasi-compact. Fix an affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A$ of $Y$, put $W=f^{-1}V$, and choose a finite open cover by affine open subschemes $W={\bigcup }_i{U}_i$. For each pair $i,j$, choose a finite affine cover $(W_{ij\ell }{)}_{\ell }$ of $U_i\cap U_j$. Empty overlaps contribute no terms.

Write $M=\Gamma (W,\mathcal{F})$. The sheaf gluing axiom gives the exact sequencewhere $\delta$ is the difference of the two restrictions to each overlap chart. All terms are $A$-modules through $f$. For $a\in A$, the inverse image of $D(a)$ cuts each $U_i$ and $W_{ij\ell }$ by a principal open subscheme. Because $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf, sections on these smaller affine charts are the corresponding module localizations at $a$. Exactness of localization and its commutation with finite products now identify the localized equalizer with the equalizer for the restricted cover. ThusThe isomorphisms respect restrictions, proving $(f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}){|}_V\cong \tilde{M}$ on the basis of principal open subschemes. Since $V$ was arbitrary, $f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf. The finite covers of overlaps are what allow the proof to work for nonseparated Noetherian schemes; this is the quasi-coherence of direct image under a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism.

For a quasi-coherent sheaf which is not coherent but has coherent direct image, use $f:{\mathbb{P}}_k^1\to \mathrm{Spec}k$ andThis infinite negative-twist sum with zero global sections is quasi-coherent: on each standard affine chart it is the sheaf associated with a direct sum of free rank-one modules. Its stalk at every point, modulo the maximal ideal, is an infinite-dimensional vector space. A finitely generated module would have a finite-dimensional quotient, so $\mathcal{F}$ is not a coherent sheaf.

Nevertheless, $\Gamma ({\mathbb{P}}^1,\mathcal{O}(-1))=0$. This follows from cohomology of twisting sheaves on projective space, or directly by gluing on the two standard affine charts: if $z=t_1/t_0$, a section is a polynomial $p(z)$ on the first chart and $q(z^{-1})$ on the second with $p(z)=z^{-1}q(z^{-1})$, which forces both to vanish. Global sections commute with this direct sum: they are the kernel of the difference map for the two-chart cover, and direct sums commute with that finite equalizer of modules. Hencewhich is coherent on $\mathrm{Spec}k$. Both schemes in this example are Noetherian.

For a finite morphism, such an example is impossible. On an affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A$ of the target, its inverse image is $\mathrm{Spec}B$, with $B$ a finite $A$-module. Write $\mathcal{F}{|}_{f^{-1}V}=\tilde{M}$. Its direct image corresponds to $M$ considered as an $A$-module. If the direct image is coherent, $M$ is finitely generated over $A$. The same generators also generate it over $B$, because $A$ acts through $B$. Since $B$ is Noetherian, $\tilde{M}$ is coherent. Conversely, a finite set of $B$-generators combined with a finite set of $A$-generators of $B$ gives finitely many $A$-generators of $M$. Thus coherence reflected by finite direct image gives the stronger equivalence

Finally, let $Y=\mathrm{Spec}k[x,y]$, let $X=Y\setminus \{(x,y)\}$ be the punctured affine plane, and let $j:X\hookrightarrow Y$ be the open immersion. Both are integral schemes, but $j$ is not an isomorphism of schemes because it omits a point. The cover $X=D(x)\cup D(y)$ givesinside the field of fractions $k(x,y)$. Indeed, in a reduced fraction, membership in the first localization forces every denominator factor to be associated to $x$, while membership in the second forces it to be associated to $y$. Unique factorization and coprimality force the denominator to be a unit. By the theorem just proved, $j_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_X$ is quasi-coherent on the affine $Y$, hence determined by this module of global sections. The natural map ${\mathcal{O}}_Y\to j_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_X$ corresponds to the identity of $k[x,y]$, soa coherent sheaf. This is a concrete case of codimension-two extension of regular functions on a normal variety.

Write $n=bk$, let $I_n$ be the identity matrix, let $J_m$ be the $m$-by-$m$ all-ones matrix, and put $B=\mathrm{diag}(J_k,\dots ,J_k)$, with one diagonal block per experimental block. The variance-covariance matrix isIts orthogonal decomposition is obtained by first subtracting each block's sample mean, then subtracting the grand sample mean from the block means. More explicitly, writing $x_{jt}$ for coordinate $t$ in block $j$, the three invariant subspaces areThey are pairwise orthogonal, with dimensions $b(k-1)$, $b-1$ and $1$, and their direct sum is ${\mathbb{R}}^n$. On $W$, both $B$ and $J_n$ vanish. On $U$, $B=kI$ and $J_n=0$. On $G$, $B=kI$ and $J_n=nI$. Thus the eigenvalues and corresponding invariant subspaces areIf some eigenvalues coincide, their eigenspace is the direct sum of the listed subspaces with that value. Zero-dimensional rows are omitted when $b=1$ or $k=1$. For an admissible covariance matrix the eigenvalues on nonzero subspaces must be nonnegative; these conditions are also sufficient for positive semidefiniteness. The expectation parameters do not affect this calculation.

Interpret the angle as the directed subspace angle defined by the infimum of projected unit vectors; it is different from the smallest angle between two subspaces. WriteConsider the bounded linear operator $T:W⟶V^{\perp }$ given by $Tw=P_{V^{\perp }}w$. Its adjoint operator, between these two Hilbert spaces, is $T^{\ast }u=P_{W}u$: for $w\in W$ and $u\in V^{\perp }$, the orthogonal projections give $⟨Tw,u⟩=⟨w,u⟩=⟨w,P_{W}u⟩$. The two positive directed subspace angle cosines yieldThe first bound makes $T$ injective and gives a closed range. Explicitly, if $T{w}_j$ converges, then $\Vert w_j-w_k\Vert \le a^{-1}\Vert T{w}_j-T{w}_k\Vert$, so $(w_j)$ is a Cauchy sequence. The closed subspace of a Hilbert space $W$ is complete, and its limit maps to the proposed range limit. The second bound gives $\ker T^{\ast }=\{0\}$. A vector $u\in V^{\perp }$ orthogonal to the range has $T^{\ast }u=0$, so it must be zero. The range is therefore dense as well as closed in $V^{\perp }$, and $T$ is onto. This is the mechanism of invertibility from lower bounds on an operator and its adjoint.

For any $f\in H$, choose the unique $w\in W$ with $Tw=P_{V^{\perp }}f$. Then $P_{V^{\perp }}(f-w)=0$, so $f-w\in V$. Moreover, if $w\in W\cap V$, then $Tw=0$ and hence $w=0$. Every vector has a unique decomposition, andThe direct sum is a topological one as well: the component $w=T^{-1}{P}_{V^{\perp }}f$ depends boundedly on $f$, with operator norm at most $a^{-1}$.

For precision, the quoted equality of the norms of complementary oblique projections needs both summands nonzero. For example, with $H=\mathbb{R}$, $V=H$ and $W=\{0\}$, the oblique projection is $I$, so $\Vert I\Vert =1$ but $\Vert I-I\Vert =0$. The secant function has value one here, so the second equality in the quoted formula fails. With nonzero complementary summands its intended version is valid. The proof above does not use that formula. The angle itself is undefined on a zero source space because it has no unit vectors; expressing the hypotheses as the two lower bounds handles zero spaces without ambiguity.

Use $T=P_{V^{\perp }}{|}_U:U⟶V^{\perp }$. Positivity of the directed subspace angle cosine givesso $T$ is injective. The two vector spaces have the same finite dimension, $n$. By the rank-nullity theorem, $T$ is also surjective. There is no need to assume a second positive directed subspace angle cosine in this finite-dimensional case.

For any $f\in H$, find $u\in U$ with $Tu=P_{V^{\perp }}f$. Then $f-u\in V$. If $u\in U\cap V$, then $Tu=0$, and injectivity gives $u=0$. HenceThe direct sum is again bounded: $u=T^{-1}{P}_{V^{\perp }}f$. If $n=0$, then $U=\{0\}$ and $V^{\perp }=\{0\}$, so closedness of $V$ gives $V=H$ and the conclusion directly; no angle of an empty unit sphere is needed. Equal finite dimensions are essential to the surjectivity argument, whereas mere injectivity between infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces is insufficient.

The linear independence of the first $n$ elements of each orthonormal system shows that $T_n$ and $S_n$ have the same finite dimension $n$ and are closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. Apply part (b) with $U=T_n$ and $V=S_n^{\perp }$. Since $(S_n^{\perp }{)}^{\perp }=S_n$, the positive directed subspace angle cosine givesLet $Q$ be the oblique projection onto $T_n$ along $S_n^{\perp }$. Define ${\tilde{f}}_n=Qf$. Its residual $f-Qf$ is orthogonal to every ${\psi }_j$ with $1\le j\le n$, so the required measurements agree. Conversely, if $g\in T_n$ has the same measurements, then $f-g\in S_n^{\perp }$; uniqueness of the direct sum decomposition gives $g=Qf$. Thus this is finite-dimensional Hilbert sampling reconstruction.

There is also an explicit coefficient description. Use the inner product convention linear in its first entry and putThen $Cc=b$. The orthonormal systems show $\Vert P_{S_n}{\sum }_k{c}_k{\varphi }_k\Vert =\Vert Cc{\Vert }_2$ and $\Vert {\sum }_k{c}_k{\varphi }_k\Vert =\Vert c{\Vert }_2$, so the smallest singular value of $C$ is $\cos {\theta }_{T_n,S_n}>0$. Hence $c=C^{-1}b$, another direct proof of existence and uniqueness.

For $n\ge 1$, both summands of this direct sum are nonzero: the infinite orthonormal system $({\psi }_j)$ contains ${\psi }_{n+1}\in S_n^{\perp }$. The permitted oblique projection norm formula therefore applies without its degenerate exception, givingThe operator norm immediately yields the stability estimate $\Vert {\tilde{f}}_n\Vert \le \sec {\theta }_{T_n,S_n}\Vert f\Vert$. For the approximation bounds, put $e=f-P_{T_n}f$. Because $Q$ fixes $T_n$, we haveso the operator norm estimate gives $\Vert f-Qf\Vert \le \sec {\theta }_{T_n,S_n}\Vert e\Vert$. For the lower bound, $e\perp T_n$ while $P_{T_n}f-Qf\in T_n$. The Pythagorean identity givesThe unique measurement-matching reconstruction is stable and within the secant function factor of the best orthogonal projection approximation:If a zero-dimensional reconstruction is admitted, it is simply ${\tilde{f}}_0=0$ and its error equals the norm of $f$; that case is best stated directly instead of using the angle of a zero space.

The Weyl complete reducibility theorem states that every finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra is a direct sum of Irreducible Lie algebra representations. Equivalently, every invariant vector subspace has an invariant complement.

We use the permitted Casimir operator properties in the following precise form. There is a central quadratic operator $C$ commuting with the action on every module; it is zero on the trivial Lie algebra representation, and on every nontrivial finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation it is a nonzero scalar $c$. This follows from the Schur lemma and the Casimir eigenvalue $c_{\lambda }=(\lambda ,\lambda +2\rho )$, using the Killing form normalization. We also use the permitted one-dimensional-representation fact: a complex semisimple Lie algebra has only trivial one-dimensional representations. Equivalently, it is a perfect Lie algebra, $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=\mathfrak{g}$, so a character $\mathfrak{g}\to \mathbb{C}$ annihilating brackets must vanish. Neither fact assumes complete reducibility of the module being proved reducible.

First prove that every finite-dimensional short exact sequencewith trivial quotient splits. If $W$ is nontrivial irreducible, the Casimir operator $C_E$ has image in $W$ and restricts to $c{I}_W$ there. Consequently $\ker C_E$ is a one-dimensional invariant complement to $W$. If $W$ is trivial irreducible, $E$ has a basis in which every action is $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& a(x)\\ 0& 0\end{array}\right)$. The Lie algebra representation identity makes $a([x,y])=0$, so the one-dimensional-representation fact gives $a=0$ and again the sequence splits.

For general $W$, induct on $\dim W$. Choose an irreducible submodule $W_1\subseteq W$. The induced sequence with kernel $W/W_1$ and middle term $E/W_1$ splits by induction. The inverse image $E_1\subseteq E$ of its invariant complement is a submodule fitting into $0\to W_1\to E_1\to \mathbb{C}\to 0$. The irreducible-kernel case gives an invariant line in $E_1$ mapping isomorphically to the quotient. It is also an invariant complement to $W$ in $E$. The case $W=0$ starts this induction. This proves splitting of a trivial quotient for a semisimple Lie algebra, including kernels that are not assumed completely reducible.

Now let $U\subseteq V$ be any invariant subspace. On the Hom representation $\mathrm{Hom}(V,U)$ the action isLet $E$ consist of the maps whose restriction to $U$ is a scalar multiple of $I_U$. This is a submodule, and restriction givesThe right-hand map is surjective because an ordinary linear projection $V\to U$ exists; its quotient action is trivial because a commutator with $I_U$ is zero. The splitting just proved supplies an invariant $T\in E$ with $T{|}_U=I_U$. Thus $T$ intertwines the actions, $T^2=T$, andThe cases $U=0$ and $U=V$ are immediate. Choosing an irreducible submodule and repeating this complement construction proves the Weyl complete reducibility theorem. This last step is invariant complement from an equivariant projection.

Dropping finite dimensionality gives an example with the complex simple Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$. Its Verma module of highest weight zero has a basis $v_0,v_1,\dots$ withwhere $e{v}_0=0$. These actions obey $[h,e]=2e$, $[h,f]=-2f$, $[e,f]=h$. The span of $v_1,v_2,\dots$ is a proper submodule and the quotient is trivial. It has no invariant complement: such a complement would be a trivial line, while $f$ is injective on the entire module. Thus a simple Lie algebra can have an infinite-dimensional representation that is not completely reducible, even over $\mathbb{C}$.

Work over $\mathbb{C}$. Decompose $V$ as the direct sum of the generalized eigenspaces $V_{\lambda }$ of $X$. Define $X_s$ to be $\lambda I$ on $V_{\lambda }$ and set $X_n=X-X_s$. Then $X_s$ is a diagonalisable endomorphism, $X_n$ is a nilpotent endomorphism, and they commute. For uniqueness, any commuting decomposition $X=S+N$ has $S$ and $N$ commuting with $X$, hence preserving each $V_{\lambda }$. Decompose $V_{\lambda }$ further into eigenspaces of $S$. On a nonzero such space with eigenvalue $\sigma$, the operator $X=\sigma I+N$ has only the eigenvalue $\sigma$, so $\sigma =\lambda$. Since $S$ is diagonalizable, $S=\lambda I$ throughout $V_{\lambda }$. Thus $S=X_s$ and $N=X_n$. This is the Additive Jordan decomposition.

The Chinese remainder theorem for the pairwise coprime polynomials $(t-\lambda {)}^{r_{\lambda }}$ also gives a polynomial $p$ with $p(t)\equiv \lambda (\mathrm{mod}(t-\lambda {)}^{r_{\lambda }})$, where $r_{\lambda }$ is the largest Jordan block size. Consequently $X_s=p(X)$ and $X_n=X-p(X)$. This polynomial description shows that both parts preserve every $X$-invariant subspace.

On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\lambda },V_{\mu })$ the operator $\mathrm{ad}{X}_s$ is the scalar $\mu -\lambda$, so it is diagonalizable. The nilpotence of commutation by a nilpotent endomorphism makes $\mathrm{ad}{X}_n$ nilpotent. They commute, since $[\mathrm{ad}{X}_s,\mathrm{ad}{X}_n]=\mathrm{ad}[X_s,X_n]=0$. Uniqueness of the Additive Jordan decomposition therefore gives the adjoint compatibility of additive Jordan decomposition:Now let $\mathfrak{g}\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ be a complex semisimple Lie algebra and $X\in \mathfrak{g}$. Since the semisimple part of $\mathrm{ad}X$ is a polynomial in $\mathrm{ad}X$, it preserves $\mathfrak{g}$. Thus $[X_s,\mathfrak{g}]\subseteq \mathfrak{g}$. By the Weyl complete reducibility theorem, the Adjoint representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ on $\mathrm{End}(V)$ has a decomposition $\mathrm{End}(V)=\mathfrak{g}\oplus M$ into invariant subspaces. Write $X_s=y+z$ with $y\in \mathfrak{g}$ and $z\in M$. For $a\in \mathfrak{g}$, the vector $[z,a]=[X_s,a]-[y,a]$ lies in $\mathfrak{g}$, and invariance of $M$ puts it in $M$ as well. Hence $[z,a]=0$.

Decompose $V={⨁}_j{U}_j$ into Irreducible Lie algebra representations. Each $U_j$ is preserved by $X_s=p(X)$ and by $y$, hence by $z$. The Schur lemma makes $z{|}_{U_j}=c_{j}I$. A semisimple Lie algebra is a perfect Lie algebra, so every representing element of $\mathfrak{g}$ has zero trace on every $U_j$. Also $\mathrm{tr}(X_s{|}_{U_j})=\mathrm{tr}(X{|}_{U_j})$, because $X_n$ is nilpotent there. It follows that $c_j\dim U_j=\mathrm{tr}(z{|}_{U_j})=0$. In characteristic zero, $c_j=0$, so $z=0$. Therefore $X_s\in \mathfrak{g}$ and $X_n=X-X_s\in \mathfrak{g}$. This proves that semisimple matrix Lie algebras are closed under additive Jordan decomposition, including representations with repeated isomorphic irreducible summands.

Define the exterior square over the arbitrary field $k$ by ${\bigwedge }^{2}V=(V\otimes V)/\mathrm{span}\{v\otimes v:v\in V\}$. Write the image of $u\otimes v$ as $u\wedge v$. Then $v\wedge v=0$ and $u\wedge v=-v\wedge u$; the basis is $v_i\wedge v_j$ with $i<j$, in characteristic two as well. The exterior-power Lie algebra representation isThe tensor product of Lie algebra representations descends to this quotient: $x\cdot (v\otimes v)=xv\otimes v+v\otimes xv$ is a linear combination of square tensors, namely $(v+xv)\otimes (v+xv)-v\otimes v-xv\otimes xv$. On the wedge basis its coefficients follow directly from the original representing matrices. Expanding both actions shows $[{\rho }_{{\wedge }^2}(x),{\rho }_{{\wedge }^2}(y)]={\rho }_{{\wedge }^2}([x,y])$.

The inclusions of $V$ and $W$ into their direct sum define the mapA combined basis shows that this sends a basis to the pure-$V$, pure-$W$ and mixed wedge basis vectors, with no overlap and no omission. The defining action on each wedge proves equivariance. Hence the exterior square of a direct sum givesNo division by $2$ is involved, so the proof remains valid in characteristic two.

For the complex special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$, write ${\Gamma }_{a,b}$ for the irreducible highest-weight representation with Dynkin labels $(a,b)$, and $V={\Gamma }_{1,0}$. First the sl3 decomposition of the symmetric-square dual tensor product isIndeed contraction $c((uv)\otimes f)=f(u)v+f(v)u$ is a surjective Lie algebra representation homomorphism onto $V$. Its 15-dimensional kernel contains the highest-weight vector $e_1^2\otimes e_3^{\ast }$ of weight $(2,1)$. The Weyl dimension formula gives $\dim {\Gamma }_{2,1}=15$, and the Weyl complete reducibility theorem identifies the kernel and splits the map. With $B={\Gamma }_{2,1}$, the direct-sum identity reduces the requested calculation to ${\bigwedge }^{2}B$, $B\otimes V$ and ${\bigwedge }^{2}V$.

For completeness, these decompositions can be checked entirely by formal characters. Let $x_1{x}_2{x}_3=1$, $h_1=x_1+x_2+x_3$, $h_1^{\ast }=x_1^{-1}+x_2^{-1}+x_3^{-1}$ and $h_2={\sum }_i{x}_i^2+{\sum }_{i<j}{x}_i{x}_j$. Then ${\chi }_B=h_2{h}_1^{\ast }-h_1$. The Weyl character formula takes the determinant formSubstitute ${\chi }_B$ into ${\chi }_{{\wedge }^{2}B}(x)=\frac{1}{2}({\chi }_B(x{)}^2-{\chi }_B(x_1^2,x_2^2,x_3^2))$ and collect the determinant characters. This gives the exterior square of the sl3 representation of highest weight (2,1) and the sl3 highest-weight tensor rule:The first line has dimensions $21+42+24+15+3=105=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{15}{2}\right)$; the tensor product has dimension $24+15+6=45$. Equivalently, enumerate weights with the sl3 interlacing character formula and subtract characters from the highest weight downwards. FinallyIts dimension is $21+42+48+30+6+6=153=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{18}{2}\right)$. The exterior square here is taken of the entire 18-dimensional tensor product; taking it only of $S^{2}V$ would be a different representation.

For a finitely generated module $V={⨁}_d{V}_d$ over the graded ring $S=k[X_1,\dots ,X_n]$, with each $X_i$ of degree one, its Poincare series of a graded module isThis is also its Hilbert series. One usually takes $d\ge 0$; allowing an integer grading also permits finitely many negative degrees. Homogeneous generators of degrees $a_1,\dots ,a_h$ give a surjection ${⨁}_{j}S(-a_j)\to V$, where the graded shift is defined by $V(-a{)}_d=V_{d-a}$. Consequently every $V_d$ is a finite-dimensional vector space and $V_d=0$ for all sufficiently negative $d$.

The Hilbert-Serre theorem in the standard grading saysFor a nonnegatively graded $V$, the numerator is in $\mathbb{Z}[t]$. Equivalently, the only possible pole of this rational expression is at $t=1$, with order at most $n$.

We prove the Hilbert-Serre theorem by induction on the number of variables. For $n=0$, $S=k$ and $V$ is a finite-dimensional graded module; thus $P_V(t)$ is a Laurent polynomial. Suppose $n>0$ and putThe Hilbert basis theorem makes $S$ a Noetherian ring, so $K$ is a finitely generated module, as is $C$. Both are graded modules killed by $X_n$, hence finitely generated over $S^{\prime }=k[X_1,\dots ,X_{n-1}]$.

The graded exact sequenceidentifies the kernel and cokernel of multiplication by $X_n$. Taking the alternating sum of the finite-dimensional degree components yieldssoBy induction the right side has denominator $(1-t{)}^{n-1}$, which proves the required denominator $(1-t{)}^n$. Since $(1-t{)}^n{P}_V(t)$ has no negative powers when $V$ is nonnegatively graded, its Laurent polynomial numerator is an ordinary polynomial in that case.

For $n\ge 1$, this also implies the usual Hilbert polynomial consequence. Writing $Q(t)={\sum }_j{q}_j{t}^j$ and usinggives, for all sufficiently large $d$,a polynomial in $d$ of degree at most $n-1$. For $n=0$, the graded pieces are eventually zero.

For the final request, a free resolution of $V$ is an exact sequencewith each $F_i$ a free module. In the graded setting we take finite direct sums of shifts $S(-a)$ and maps preserving degree. The resolution has length at most $n$ if $F_i=0$ for every $i>n$. The syzygy modules are the successive kernels which record the relations among generators, then relations among those relations, and so on.

Put $\mathfrak{m}=(X_1,\dots ,X_n)$, the homogeneous maximal ideal with $S/\mathfrak{m}=k$. Choose a homogeneous $k$-basis of $V/\mathfrak{m}V$ and lift it to $V$. These lifts generate $V$ by the graded Nakayama lemma: a bounded-below graded module $W$ satisfying $W=\mathfrak{m}W$ must be zero, since a nonzero homogeneous element of least degree could not be a sum of variables times elements of lower degrees. Apply this to the quotient by the submodule generated by the chosen lifts. This gives a surjection $F_0\to V$ inducing an isomorphism modulo $\mathfrak{m}$.

Its kernel is finitely generated because $S$ is a Noetherian ring. Repeat the construction for that kernel, then for each subsequent kernel. We obtain a minimal graded free resolution, meaningIndeed, at each stage the free cover induces an isomorphism modulo $\mathfrak{m}$, so its kernel lies in $\mathfrak{m}$ times its source. The sequence is exact by construction, though it may at first appear infinite.

The Koszul complex on $X_1,\dots ,X_n$ iswith basis vectors $e_j$ given degree one, and differentialThe hat means omission of that factor. Every pair of terms in ${\partial }^2$ cancels with opposite signs, so this is a chain complex. The sequence $X_1,\dots ,X_n$ is a regular sequence: after quotienting by the first $j-1$ variables, the next variable is a non-zero-divisor in the remaining polynomial ring.

The Koszul complex is consequently exact in positive degrees and has $H_0=k$, so it is a Koszul resolution of $k$ of length $n$. For completeness, one proves this by induction: for one variable it is $0\to S\stackrel{X_1}{\to }S\to S/(X_1)\to 0$. Appending $X_j$ constructs the mapping cone of multiplication by $X_j$ on the previous chain complex. Its homology is zero in positive degrees because $X_j$ acts injectively on $S/(X_1,\dots ,X_{j-1})$; its degree-zero homology is the further quotient. Here a mapping cone combines a chain complex with a shifted copy and adds the given multiplication map to the differential, thereby measuring its kernel and cokernel on homology.

The Tor functor ${\mathrm{Tor}}_i^S(V,k)$ is defined as the degree-$i$ homology of $F_{\bullet }{\otimes }_{S}k$ for a free resolution $F_{\bullet }$ of $V$. It can equally be computed as the homology of $V{\otimes }_S{K}_{\bullet }$, using the Koszul resolution of $k$. To see the equality, form the double complex $F_{\bullet }{\otimes }_S{K}_{\bullet }$. Taking homology first along $F_{\bullet }$ leaves $V{\otimes }_S{K}_{\bullet }$, since each $K_i$ is a free module; taking homology first along $K_{\bullet }$ leaves $F_{\bullet }{\otimes }_{S}k$, since each $F_i$ is free. The finite sums along each total degree identify both with the homology of the total complex. This also explains the symmetry used in computing the Tor functor.

Since $K_i=0$ for $i>n$, we have ${\mathrm{Tor}}_i^S(V,k)=0$ for $i>n$. On the other hand, all differentials of the minimal graded free resolution become zero after tensoring with $k=S/\mathfrak{m}$, soThus $F_i/\mathfrak{m}{F}_i=0$ for $i>n$, and the graded Nakayama lemma implies $F_i=0$ for those $i$. We have proved the required Hilbert syzygy theorem:where some initial $F_i$ may be zero. The argument supplies finitely generated graded free modules, which is stronger than merely giving an ungraded free resolution.

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.